Loading...
COLONIAL ROAD - CONSERVATION COMMISSION Colonial Road PHASE I - LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MADEP Site Number 3-2565) JANUARY 1992 M ED ED ABB Environmental Services, Inc. AF UDR) ASEA BROWN BOVERI I PHASE I - LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MADEP Site Number 3-2565) Prepared for: CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION Prepared by: ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 107 AUDUBON ROAD WAKEFIELD, MA 01880 JANUARY 1992 1 1 I� TABLE OF CONTENTS HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MADEP Site No. 3-2565) Section Title Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.1 SITE OWNERSHIP AND LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.2 PHYSICAL SITE SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 2.4 CURRENT AND FORMER SITE USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8 2.5 CURRENT AND FORMER USES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . 2-13 2.6 POTENTIAL SENSITIVE RECEPTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-17 3.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING SITE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AND DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE ISCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.1 HAMBLET & HAYES MONITORING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 I 3.2 HLA 1989 INVESTIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.3 HLA 1991 SOIL SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 3.4 PHASE I - LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 4.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.1 SOIL BORING PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.2 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION/WELL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES . . . . . . 4-4 4.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 4.4 GROUNDWATER FLOW EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6 4.4.1 Surface Water Stake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6 I 4.4.2 Piezometer Nests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6 ' 4.4.3 Elevation Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7 4.4.4 Water Level Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7 4.5 SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENT SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7 4.6 INVESTIGATION OF STAINED SOIL AREA EAST OF BUILDING I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 5A SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.1 GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 6.0 - RESULTS OF FIELD SCREENING AND LABORATORY ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 6.1 RESULTS OF SUBSURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 6.1.1. Field Screening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 ' 6.1.2 Laboratory Analysis of Subsurface Soil Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3 bpi 09123.toc ii 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS , (Continued) HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MADEP Site No. 3-2565) Section Title Page No. 6.2 RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3 6.3 RESULTS OF SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4 6.3.1 Results of Surface Water Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4 6.3.2 Results of Sediment Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 6.4 RESULTS OF SURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 6.5 DISCUSSION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES . . . . . . . . 6-5 6.5.1 Subsurficial Soil and Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 ' 6.5.2 Sediments, Surface Water, and Surficial Soil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.1 POTENTIAL SOURCE AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.2 POTENTIAL MIGRATION PATHWAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3 ' 7.3 ECOLOGICAL RECEPTOR ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4 8.0 FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 8.1 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 8.2 GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 8.3 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 8.3.1 Former South Underground Storage Tank Farm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 8.3.2 Active Underground Storage Tank Farm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 8.3.3 Former North Underground Storage Tank Farm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 8.3.4 Spray Dryer Building Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3 8.3.5 Mill Pond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3 8.3.6 Other Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4 9.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D bp109123.too lii 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. LIST OF TABLES HAMBLET& HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MADEP Site No. 3-2565) Table Title 4-1 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATION POINT RELATIVE ELEVATIONS 6-1 SUBSURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 6-2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 6-3 SURFACE WATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 6-4 SEDIMENT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 6-5 SURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 1 7-1 COMPARISON OF MILL POND SURFACE WATER CONCENTRATIONS WITH AVAILABLE STANDARDS 7-2 COMPARISON OF MILL POND SEDIMENT CONCENTRATIONS WITH AVAILABLE CRITERIA/ STANDARDS 1 bp109123.toc IV 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. LIST OF FIGURES HAMBLET& HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MAD EP Site No. 3-2565) Figure Title 1-1 SITE LOCATION 2-1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP PLAN 2-2 SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN 2-3 STORAGE TANK PLAN 3-1 HLA FIELD INVESTIGATION LOCATION PLAN 4-1 ABB-ES FIELD INVESTIGATION LOCATION PLAN 5-1 CROSS SECTION LOCATION PLAN 5-2 SCHEMATIC GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION A-A 5-3 SCHEMATIC GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION B-B 5.4 SCHEMATIC GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION C-C 5-5 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR MAP 6-1 TOTAL VOC CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER 6-2 PCE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER 6-3 1,1,1-TCA & I,I DCA CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER 6-4 TOTAL CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER bpi 09123.toc v 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. APPENDIX HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY COLONIAL ROAD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (MADEP Site No. 3-2565) A. INTERIM SITE CLASSIFICATION FORM & SOIL BORING LOGS &WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAMS C. SUMMARY OF DEPTH TO WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS D. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS i i 1 1 - 1- 1 y bp109123.toc vi 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. i t 1 i i 1 1 1 i 1 1 i i 1 1 0 1 Z �0 W to �. ' SECTION 1 ' 1.0 INTRODUCTION A Phase I - Limited Site Investigation (LSI) of the Hamblet & Hayes Co. (H&H) facility located at Colonial Road in Salem, Massachusetts (Figure 1-1) was conducted by ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES), on behalf of CIBA-GEIGY Corporation (CIBA-GEIGY). The Hamblet & Hayes Co. Colonial Road facility (the Site) was listed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1 (MADEP) as a Location to be Investigated (LTBI) in the MADEP "List of Confirmed Sites and Locations to Be Investigatedo Issued in March 1990 and dated January 15, 1990. This Phase I report has been ' prepared to meet the requirements of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) as set forth at 310 CMR 40.000 and in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the MCP at 310 CMR 40.543. A completed Interim She Classification Form is attached as Appendix A. The Site Is currently owned by Hamblet & Hayes Company. Hamblet & Hayes Co. was previously a - ' wholly-owned subsidiary of CIBA-GEIGY Corporation. Under the terms of a stock purchase agreement between CIBA-GEIGY and Van Waters & Rogers Inc. (VW&R), CIBA-GEIGY has retained responsibility for certain investigation and remedial response actions at the Site including and not limited to the Preliminary Environmental Assessment and LSI. ABB-ES completed a Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report dated January 1991 for the Site. This report was submitted to the MADEP on January 15, 1991. The Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report presented a discussion of Site ownership, use and history; a detailed description of the Site physical and environmental setting; preliminary identification of potential sensitive receptors; a summary of regulatory background Information; and a summary of environmental monitoring data. Harding Lawson Associates (HLA) of Princeton, New Jersey completed a due diligence investigation in 1989 for VW&R as part of the real estate acquisition process. The results of the HLA work was a significant source of information for the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report. The scope of the Phase I - LSI was crafted from review of the Site Information data base as presented in the Preliminary Environmental Assessment report. bp109123.01 1-1 05440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 1 Section 2.0 of this report summarizes portions of the information concerning a general description of the , Site which was presented in the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report. Section 3.0 summarizes the results of previous environmental Investigations at the Site and presents the objectives developed during scoping of the Phase I field investigation. Section 4.0 describes the field investigation conducted. Section 5.0 presents a discussion of Site geology and hydrogeology as determined by Site investigation activities and background research. Section 6.0 presents the results of chemical screening and analyses of samples collected during the Phase I investigation. Section 7.0 presents a discussion of the results of , the investigation, including potential source areas for compounds detected during the investigation, and a discussion of potential migration pathways. Section 8.0 presents findings drawn from the Preliminary , Environmental Assessment Report and Phase I - LSI activities. Finally, Section 9.0 is a listing of references used to prepare this report. i bp109123.01 1-2 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ✓ I � l I 1 o� [ neuro VA � � ��0 � I �reenla�in� � �J � •a �• N •6 �. �¢;� /� t �� iso r'- ,'.�` �.� �r a /zb� !t _ 3'� J •°• o o / Tidal yry�' � e ra '�•, re I it � � �� . / � FtffC ryl / � ' Cd . Fa flat *a Sso�a. �0 /y <o S \ L i V1—�_a Den -0Lt � `J� �(� l� 1 r/� an t 1 �. ' e rl I�. �� j '�lri ❑ 1 Long Pt l A A 1'7 i v1 t �'/ : y �, P1aY8a9unU �G O� •�/ r tp-G Vl SIE(R �l fVA11 I I WAN OCNS C2+/e U� w yJ i o � tsnosot VI tA ,� � v�AcF m� almer Cy, SITE W�F�'�� \ ; is ' �,� • ra8sdy ` '� M` f ,•(Qafk mpickenhg 0.l I/ I (� t � v •.� VAS � `O — � ��� � R.: � 1A/ \ 7 d- 1 � PS 1 •,��-��.n L� SOURCE:A 1979.TOPOGRAPMC 7S MNUTE SERIES: O 2,000 4,000 M, SALEW11979 LYNN,MA 1970 1 SCALE FEET auAORANOLELocAnoN 1-1 AL lilt ABB Environmental FIGURE ♦%1 I Services Inc. SITE LOCATION ASEA 6ROYYN BOVEW HAMBLET & HAYES SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 1 e , Z O H U W N , 1 SECTION 2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ! The following section summarizes information gathered by ABB-ES from available records at local, state, and federal offices; from reports prepared for the Site by HLA in 1989 and 1990; from Site tours; from interviews of Site owner/operator representatives; and from the ABB-ES 1991 field investigation. Much of this background Information was presented in the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report prepared by ABB-ES in January 1991. These sources of information provide a basis for identifying historical and present activities or evidence of activities which may be associated with the release of oil ' or hazardous materials at the Site. 2.1 SITE OWNERSHIP AND LOCATION According to records at the City of Salem Assessors Office, the Site is comprised of three parcels which are currently owned by H&H and the Kirto Corp. (Figure 2-1). H&H is currently a subsidiary of VW&R. The stock of H&H was purchased by VW&R from CIBA-GEIGY in September 1989. ' Site:Owner: NAME: Hamblet &Hayes Co. The Kirto Corp. The Kirto Corp. RATE OF OWNERSHIP: 1954 1961: 1963 :ASSESSORS:MAP: 24 24 24 PLOTS; t17 118 1t9 $OOK: 3810 4644; 4961 ' PAGE: 589 405 276 PLOT SIZE: 2.23AC 1.51AG 27000 sgft. SRe Locatlbn: ADDRESS: Colonial Road Salem, Massachusetts 01970 COUNTY: Essex USGS QUADRANGLE: SalemMA- 1979' UTM COORDINATES: 4708000 mN, 344000 mE :LATITUDE/LONGITUDE: 4� 30'x40" N, 7Q 54' 15" W bp109123.02 2-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 2 2.2 PHYSICAL SITE SETTING i The Site encompasses approximately 4.36 acres at the eastern end of Colonial Road in Salem, , Massachusetts (Figure 2-1). A detailed description of the physical Site setting was presented in the ABB-ES January 1991 Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report. A summary is provided below. , The Site is located in a small commercial/industrial complex consisting of industrial, warehouse, and , office facilities, in an area zoned for industrial use. There are several buildings presently located at the Site including an office building, a laboratory building, a manufacturing building, and several storage , buildings. The Site is surrounded by an area of mixed land use and is bordered directly to the northeast, north, and west by a tidally influenced drainage basin locally identified as either Mill Pond or the South River. The area adjacent to the Site is referred to as Mill Pond, a part of the South River drainage basin. ' Portions of the Mill Pond/South River area are owned by the New England Power Company. A railroad yard currently operated by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) abuts the Site to the east and southeast. The railroad yard is also adjacent to the opposite side of Mill Pond beyond the eastern margin of the Site. The MBTA owns the area of Mill Pond northeast of the Site to the high water ' elevation. A commercial warehouse and office facilities, owned by Exeter International Realty Trust (Exeter) are located directly south and southwest of the Site. Access to and egress from the Site is provided via Colonial Road, from the east of the intersection of Colonial Road and Jefferson Avenue (Figure 2-1). Access to the entire Site is restricted by chain link , fencing topped with barbed wire and by Mill Pond (Figure 2-2). There are three gates into the facility: the main gate located adjacent to the main office Building A; the rear gate located adjacent to Building ' K; and a gate located where a railroad spur enters the Site from the railroad yard southeast of the Site. bp109123.02 2-2 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' 1 SECTION 2 The Site currently consists of suc buildings and a storage shed (Figure 2-2). The facility currently uses an alphabetic system for identification of the buildings. The largest of the buildings is used for manufacturing and consists of several internal subunits identified by separate letter designations (D, E, G, I, and J). These separate designations represent both separate manufacturing functions as well as ' changes in the plant through time. The principal use of the manufacturing building is for production of basic chromium sulfate for use by the tanning industry. Storage of finished product and drumming and ' storage of other non-flammable materials along with storage of containers, maintenance equipment, and other materials also occurs in the manufacturing building. The building has several different construction styles with materials ranging from all wooden to concrete block with steel roofing. The different construction materials are a result of the evolved construction history. The floor of the manufacturing building is concrete slab on grade. Building A is an office of brick construction. The office has undergone addition through its history. Building B, also of brick construction, is a laboratory and office facility. The laboratory is currently used for quality assurance/quality control evaluations of manufacturing and blending products as well as for pilot testing new blends and new products and formulations for the tanning industry. Buildings K and L are used for blending and drumming of specialty chemicals. Building H is used for storage of drummed ' product, and Building M is a storage shed used for storage of empty drums prior to filling. All four structures (Buildings K, L, H, and M) have concrete slab floors and steel walls and roofs. Parking is provided by marked spaces directly east of the main office building near the main gate to the facility. Almost all of the Site is currently paved. The northern and northeastern margins of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond are not paved. The Site Is currently serviced by municipal water supply mains and municipal sewer lines which enter the Site from the west at Colonial Road. The Site.is also serviced by overhead and underground electric lines and by overhead telephone lines. Each of the buildings is heated by separate fuel oil or propane ' gas heating systems or is not heated. - , bp109123.02 2-3 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 2 ' Aboveground fuel oil storage tanks are located in the boiler rooms of both Buildings A and B. Heat for ' the main manufacturing (U-shaped) building is provided by a main boiler serviced by a 20,000 gallon aboveground and storage tank located outside of the building and by smaller satellite heating units. There are several other aboveground, as well as underground storage tanks at the Site. Locations and contents of these other tanks are depicted on Figure 2-3. Detailed discussion of the tanks is provided in , Section 2.3 of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (ABB-ES, 1991). A network of catch basins is currently located through the west central portion of the Site (Figure 2-2). These catch basins are connected to storm drain lines which discharge through a controlled gate valve ' located at the eastern side of the manufacturing building. The storm drain system discharges from the gate valve housing through an outfall pipe to Mill Pond. According to the former Chief Engineer at the H&H facility, there are currently no known active septic , tanks or leachfields resulting in on-site sanitary wastewater discharge at the Site. Non-contact cooling ' waters associated with compressor cooling are currently discharged to a sump located Inside Building K. The compressor is used to pressurize the Freon aboveground storage tank during summer months. The , sump reportedly discharges to ground surface behind the storage shed northeast of Building K. When the underground flammable liquid storage tank farm was installed in 1981, excavation and ' dewatering reportedly indicated the presence of a high groundwater table with an abundant potential groundwater yield. A groundwater supply production well was subsequently installed directly adjacent to the northern end of Building K (H&H Well No. 1). This production well has been used to supply manufacturing process water for the facility from approximately 1983 to the present. Water derived from , the well is pumped underground to two holding tanks at the southern end of Building E for distribution Inside the Building E process manufacturing areas. The well reportedly generated up to 80,000 gallons ' of water per day regularly during past production operations. It is currently used more sporadically and produces approximately 15,000 gallons per day when in operation. bp109123.02 2.4 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' 1 ' SECTION 2 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE SETTING ' The environmental setting described below is based on visual observations made during ABB-ES Site tours; Information available from geologic, hydrogeologic, and topographic maps and publications; ' discussions with local officials; and subsurface soil and groundwater data gathered during the 1991 field Investigation, • Touograohv: Site topography is generally flat at an elevation of approximately 10 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). Topography slopes downward at the perimeter of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond to an elevation of approximately 5 feet NGVD or less. • Vegetation: The majority of the ground surface at the Site is covered with pavement and buildings. The perimeter of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond is densely covered with wetland vegetation, various grasses and shrubs, and small deciduous trees. ' • Soils: Soils observed at and underlying the Site, as recorded by ABB-ES observations during the Phase I field investigation and by records of previous soil boring, consist of a heterogeneous assemblage of sand and gravel fills, sandy clay and clayey sands, and medium to fine grained sands with lesser amounts of silt and gravels. ' Bedrock: Bedrock in the area of the Site has been mapped by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) as the Salem Gabbro-Diorite (Zen, 1983). The Salem Gabbro-Diorite outcrops over a large area in northeastern Massachusetts and exhibits a ' wide range of texture and composition from location to location resulting from a complex Igneous and structural history. ABB-ES has observed several large fractured bedrock outcrops in the vicinity of the Site, but depth to bedrock beneath the Site has ' not been confirmed. bp109123.02 2-5 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 2 , Surface Water/Wetlands: Mill Pond and associated wetland areas are located directly i adjacent to the Site. Mill Pond is Influenced by both tidal fluctuations and surface water/runoff discharges. Mill Pond drains to the north and northeast through an underground conduit that discharges into Salem Harbor near the intersection of Derby Street and Lafayette Street and the Congress Street Bridge. The conduit lies beneath the railroad yard adjacent and northeast of the Site and represents channelizing of the South River. The Site is located in the North Shore Coastal Drainage Area which is part ' of the Coastal Drainage System. The tidal Mill Pond and South River are classified by the MADEP Division of Water Pollution Control (310 CMR 4.00) as class SB Surface Waters. Waters assigned to this class are designated for the uses of protection and , propagation of fish, other aquatic life and wildlife, for primary and secondary contact recreation, and for restricted shellfish harvesting. , Groundwater: Groundwater was encountered during field investigations (HLA, 1989; ' ABB-ES, 1991) at depths ranging from approximately 7 to 10 feet below ground surface at the Site. Groundwater beneath the majority of the Site has been inferred to flow ' generally in a northward to northeastward direction toward Mill Pond. 2.4 CURRENT AND FORMER SITE USE ' The Site is currently used principally for both the manufacture of basic chromium sulfate and for the bulk ' storage, blending, and repackaging and distribution of various chemicals. There are several aboveground storage and aboveground process/reaction tanks as well as several underground storage , tanks used for both manufacturing and bulk chemical handling operations at the facility. Figure 2-3 indicates the locations and contents (as of Fall 1989) of these tanks. Loading and unloading of , hazardous materials at the Site is achieved via aboveground and underground piping. Bulk materials are delivered to the Site via tanker truck and rail car and are transferred within the Site to on-site storage tanks through designated chemical transfer areas located adjacent to material storage tanks (Figure 2-3). ' bp109123.02 2-0 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' SECTION 2 Process materials and process wastes are also transferred via above-and underground piping to materials handling/ manufacturing/storage and wastewater storage tanks. Details of current and former ' oil and hazardous materials use, storage, and waste generation, storage and disposal are provided in Section 2.3 of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (ABB-ES, 1991). The Site reportedly was initially developed in the early 1900s for use as a cement manufacturing facility. The property was subsequently occupied by Bursaw Oil Corp (Bursaw), who used the property for storage and distribution of petroleum products and reportedly had several aboveground petroleum ' storage tanks in operation at the facility. H&H began operations at the Site during the 1950s and jointly used the facility with the Bursaw until the 1970s. H&H operated the manufacturing facility and most of the northern part of the Site while Bursaw used the current laboratory building and much of the southern part of the Site. According to the City of Salem Assessors records, H&H completed purchase of the facility in 19637 CIBA-GEIGY acquired the stock of H&H in 1978. In September 1989, the stock of H&H ' was acquired by VW&R from.CIBA-GEIGY. ' H&H has historically been a supplier of materials for the tanning industry in New England. The Site was used primarily for the production of chemicals including chromium sulfate and aluminum sulfate (alum). Subsequently, H&H additionally used the facility for storage and distribution of chemicals including petroleum products and solvents and for the formulation of specialized chemicals containing phenolic- based fungicides in the former garage Building C (Figure 2-4; ABB-ES, 1991). The manufacture of alum was discontinued in the late 1980s, and the manufacture of fungicides was discontinued by 1985. Underground storage tank farms containing various petroleum products and solvents were formerly ' located adjacent to Building A and beneath Building H. Information regarding the historical storage, use and disposal of oil and hazardous materials at the Site is discussed in detail in Section 2.4 of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (ABB-ES, 1991). bp109123.02 2-7 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1 SECTION 2 , 2.5 CURRENT AND FORMER USES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ' The MBTA owns the railroad yard directly east of the Site (Figure 2-1). Several sidings and spurs are , located adjacent to the main rail lines. The Boston and Maine Railroad (B&M) previously owned the H&H Site (pre-1950) and most of the surrounding property in the vicinity of the Site. Several of the ' parcels were reportedly used for storage of various railroad cars, coal fuel and related equipment, and other materials. The New England Power Company owns the land directly abutting the Site to the north ' and northwest. This parcel is used for overhead power transmission. To the west of the New England Power Company parcel and Mill Pond are currently several commercial facilities located along Jefferson Avenue, including a furniture store, a bus company storage and refueling facility, several automotive , repair facilities, and vehicle rental facilities. Records indicate that there are several underground storage tanks located in this area and that several facilities are listed as RCRA hazardous waste generators (ABB-ES, 1991). A one-story concrete block warehouse and two-story office building are located directly south and ' southwest of the Site. This location is owned by Exeter and the current tenants are GTE Sylvania and ' VW&R/H&H Co. This property is currently used as a warehouse for materials storage (dry goods and non-flammable liquids) and office space by the tenants. The property was developed approximately 36 years ago and has been used principally for warehousing during its history. A partial summaryof , previous property owners/tenants includes the B & M Railroad, several wholesale grocery operations Including Cressy Dockham, a papergood wholesaler, and a wholesale motor oil distributor. ' Records suggest that there is a 1000-gallon capacity underground fuel oil storage tank adjacent to the , Exeter property office building area. The property is currently heated by natural gas, and this fuel oil tank is not in service. The property is also currently serviced by municipal sewer for wastewater ' disposal. Three gasoline underground storage tanks were installed at the eastern margin of the property prior to November 1974 for use by Cressy Dockham. These tanks, used by H&H for approximately 5 years, were reportedly removed in 1986. ' bpi 09123.02 2-8 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' I SECTION 2 The Colonial Office Park building is located to the west of the warehouse building. This building is owned and used as offices by various tenants including credit unions, medical offices, a medical ' laboratory, and insurance agents. ' Bewick Associates (Bewick) of Watertown, MA conducted environmental assessments at the adjacent Exeter warehouse facility in 1987 and 1989. A February 1990 report was prepared by Bewick for the ' warehouse owners (Bewick, 1990) and was made available to ABB-ES. In addition, HLA conducted field investigation activities at the Exeter property in January 1990 for VW&R. The results of this investigation are summarized in an HLA draft report (HLA, 1990). A summary of each investigation follows. The Bewick 1990 report indicates that five monitoring wells were installed at the warehouse facility. ' Wells were installed adjacent to the former underground gasoline storage tanks (BE-1, BE-5), the potential location of an underground heating oil tank (BE-2), and to abutting properties, including the Site (BE3) and the Colonial Office Park (BE-4). Groundwater samples were collected from each of the accessible wells for laboratory analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) via United States ' Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 624 and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (rPH) via EPA Methods 503B/E. A relative elevation survey of each well to an arbitrary datum was performed and depth to groundwater measurements were collected in January, 1990. The results of the analysis of groundwater samples collected by Bewick in the area of the former underground gasoline storage tanks (well BE-5) detected 7 micrograms per liter (ug/1) chloroform, 3 ug/I trichloroethene (TCE), 130 ug/I ethylbenzene, and 390 ug/I total xylenes. The ethylbenzene and ' total xylenes are compounds that are constituents of gasoline and are commonly associated with historical releases from underground gasoline storage tanks. VOCs were not detected from analysis of any other groundwater sample. A concentration of 29 mg/I TPH was detected from analysis of groundwater collected from BE-5, and a concentration of 12 mg/I TPH was detected from BE-3. ' Groundwater was Interpreted by Bewick to flow in a north-northeasterly direction. ' bp109123.02 2-9 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 2 t The HLA 1990 draft report summarizes the activities performed by Bewick in 1987 and 1989 and presents the results of investigation conducted by HLA in 1990. HLA advanced nine shallow soil borings surrounding the warehouse building and collected soil and groundwater samples from these borings for ' laboratory analysis of TPH, EP-Toxicity (EP-TOX) leachable metals, Target Compound List VOCs, and dissolved metals. One groundwater sample was collected from a monitoring well, the existing B-5 ' installed by Bewick. The results of analyses of soil samples collected by HLA from beneath the pavement at the Exeter facility , Indicated the presence of TPH at concentrations ranging from nondetected to 1200 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations of TPH between 110 mg/kg and 770 mg/kg were detected from soil ' samples collected from directly beneath the pavement at each boring location. Soil samples collected at and below the water table from the boring advanced in the area of the former gasoline underground ' storage tanks detected concentrations of TPH from 470 to 1200 mg/kg. Results from samples collected from the unsaturated zone at this boring location indicated TPH concentrations between 90 and 1.10 ' mg/kg. The results of the EP-TOX analyses of soil samples did not exceed the threshold levels which' would indicate that the soil is hazardous by its leaching characteristics. ' Analysis of groundwater collected from the boring advanced in the area of the underground gasoline storage tanks detected 900 ug/I ethylbenzene and 6300 ug/I total xylenes. A concentration of 6 ug/I ' TCE was detected from analysis of groundwater collected from BE-5. No other VOCs were detected at the other locations sampled. Concentrations of cadmium and lead were detected at or slightly above ' drinking water standards in groundwater samples collected from the area of the underground gasoline storage tanks. These metals have historically been utilized as gasoline additives and are frequently detected in groundwater along with gasoline constituents. The results of these investigations suggest that localized soil and groundwater contamination associated ' with the former underground gasoline storage tanks is present at the Exeter facility. The direction of groundwater flow Interpreted by Bewick and HLA suggests that the warehouse facility is located , upgradient of the Site. bp109123.02 2-10 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' SECTION 2 2.6 POTENTIAL SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The following is a summary of those elements that could potentially be affected by a release of oil or hazardous materials from the Site. Surface Water: Mill Pond is located directly adjacent to the Site. Mill Pond is a tidally ' Influenced surface water body that forms part of the South River drainage. The majority of the South River has been channeled Into subsurface storm drains, and filled land - , above the channel has subsequently been developed. The South River drains north- northeasterly into Salem Harbor. Wetlands: There are tidal wetland areas adjacent to Mill Pond at the northern margin of the Site. In addition, there are several unnamed wetland areas to the west, southwest and south of the Site that are also tidally influenced and drain into the South River. Parts of the Site are located within the 100 foot Bordering Vegetated Wetland buffer zone, as established by the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. Portions of the Site are located within the 100-to 500-year flood plain (Zone B) as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Administration. Public/Private Drinking Water Supply Wells: According to the Salem City Water Department, drinking water for the City of Salem is supplied by several surface water bodies located approximately 5 miles north of the Site. The Salem City Water ' Department has no records of public or private water supply wells within a one-half mile radius of the Site. There currently is a groundwater production well located at the Site ' that provides water for process formulation and non-contact cooling during facility operations. This well is currently used intermittently and reportedly had a maximum ' withdrawal rate of 80,000 gallons per day during past facility production of both alum and basic chromium sulfate. ' bp109123.02 2-11 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 2 ' • Critical Habitats: According to the National Heritage and Endangered Species Program , 1990 Atlas of Estimated Habitats of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife, there are no State-listed rare wetlands wildlife species within one-half mile of the Site. ' Demography: The Site is located In an area of mixed land use including industrial, ' commercial, and residential facilities. Private residences are located approximately 800 to 1000 feet south and east of the Site. Commercial/retail facilities are located west of ' the Site on Jefferson Avenue and east of the Site along Canal Street. • Food Chain Exposure Pathways: There are no identified commercial agricultural , operations within a one-half mile radius of the Site. There are no private residences within 500 feet of the Site. Mill Pond and the South River drain toward the Salem ' Harbor. The Salem Harbor is a Class SB marine fishery. Potential food chain elements include fish and shellfish associated with the pond, river, and the Salem Harbor. ' However, shell fishing in the area of the Salem Harbor is restricted. bp109123.02 2-12 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. t 1 1 N , O a t E9m 0 1 , , BUILDING PROPERTY LINE 1 , � RAILROAD TRACK WETLAND LOT 113 t ` Ky POWERLINES AND 3.02 Aa ! � a SUPPORT 1 MICHAUD BUS WLL POND �.` SITE AREA t ` ' ! , (LOT 117 HAMBLET S r , yg HAYES CO.; 1 LOTIIS i }` LOT I18.115 THE IS Aa KIRTO CORP.) TITUS FURNITURE f NEWPOWFA , t , a i t a fi� "' LO 115 1 .rr. MASSACHUSETTS f f 0 11S°a raj SAY TRANSPORTATION aa. AUTHORITY ARa�ga<C 1 '� �, � �'Ir_� .ice `•�' ??'R. A:a.�'"1<:s.x.a SEWER NEIL ENGLAND � y' EASEMENT •.:::e•.:.-: �"'•v POWER 1IT. 0�. LOT 1/8 pOl 'iO 65 Ac. c f I 1 , LOT 122 LOT 121 1.31 Ac. 6.10 Ae. ' 1 EXETER INTERNATIONAL REALTYTRUST ' ARIOUS OWNERS'TENANT , 1 , LOT 120 LJ LOT6 1 30.707 sq.11. MASS t 11./ ELECTRIC 1 'T t EASEMENT � PRIVATER SIDENCES t 1 1 0 200 400 FIGURE 2-1 1 SCALE FEET(APPROX.) PROPERTY OWNERSHIP PLAN NOTES:1)PLAN DERIVED FROM CITY OF SALEM ASSESSORS MAP HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY 2)AL24 DATED 1989. LLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PLAN FEATURES SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS AND PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROAMATE ONLY. 1 c660olAM ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC x x —x — / Ruuaw I vnflD ULL POND mT TO - 0_ cU Hft cwDl➢i Au % / x GnvEYExT - �/ WTE —E MFn Oi TT"Ti CHE�STOMGE FORMERNONLONVCT WATER D6CINRGE ROGI 01➢G.X %,\ ■ I o uYIT OF B.GG _ VAVENEIi BLDG.J OKiE 1� ewG.D +tr++++rH-Fr+++++r+++++rr+++r++ +1-r+++rr+rr++rr++++++rrrr++ff++++r+rr++H4+r+++r+rh MLROADSOING i W�WEEU9 ■■ iACCU=TION ■ .BLD Ewe CIEYICAL RFAfl BLENDING cL 1 BLDG L GATE COWNTE GAO % 1 N W 1 e N I 1 \ I s w °------- B I r I ° —x— —x— -z ° rx[ � 7B MyW SICNNC£BXE° cXEYCU BLENDING r gippPGY SDW BLDG W U00M1IXiY % x SLOG A GATE p _x % x• ® x Icrcwn• —°_ now 0l —r— wam LME —9— BEwF11LMF LY OWwAEIE ■ EAmIREn°°wIMT1GNAREML-a YEm 0 50 150 ® uTaTuew GAENANE FIGURE 2-2 WI.DR:,,M, SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN SCALE FEET —z—X_ rpu N UARTM, HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS NOTE:ALL LOCATIONS,DIMENSIONS OF SITE FEATURES AND PROPERTY ONES ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. 2 BUILNNGX uz va 1 I roy 1 --- N --- m D 7RNLROHIDING !t1-FF4kkkH-kthf4ki-I-FH#Ii4HHHi-1-Ffi4444Hf� RNLRLMDSIDINc H°K° .*'I L¢u6wu Fwr -t- ------------- r ------- -- LMwNK f______l % L mom. ICr O f__ __l L_ 9/ O O ma ) J R, wD r---- -7 ..gg 0RIO" K 1] n FoQO O O nwDWc014 ELL MwuFAc)uwrlc L_e'__J L______JI 1 4g p aiRO�DWATER § M E) O �N/ p L_- f _j L—�__" N°tF7 _.: ® L4L__J 0 •--, O O H8K3 r__BI__l L_ W J L------J I r -- H6K° x H6K4 TL__76__1 L__B1__J W ® r------1 f------ l L__75__J r---- -� r------i L__��__ TAxx - TANKKJ r___---1 r------ L__n__J W WTFMLL GVALIIYIDALI Kq WTEALL CA.WALT R CMiDMC9U1FAre <,m0 m ETHYL ACETATE IPIIGT lo.mo PRODUCTION WELL f------l r______} 6 Om 81IIFATE 6,m0 m BJnLACETATE 10.mo L___ J L__ZZ__1 H&H-5 ID MMOEFfLLENr 600 m DIMEtNrIFOPMM,IDE 1z KUM FORCNROME a,WD 67 METHANOL tD,mO 1. CNROM {qD m IOA:. ID 15 SU taj00 . IPA%4 Ip,mD CXEMICAL'BLDG.K EEFFLUENT .WO CHROME 6,m0 °1 CELWSOLVEACETATE 1p MTONNlm I.. . SULFURIC AOD aKoSODIUM FXAJ T PE FDN TF e, CN$TG 6,W0 (6 CXROME B. "Y` INWEGIODND y CAUSTIC e,WO q CXPOME 5,8]5 STOWGE TANK Sa EFFLUENT A)q1 e) SCRUBBER EFFLUENT S,p15 YMmYYW 2t EFFLUENT 4,N4 q CHROME E.. WMPRENWPWATEP ee tq CHROME 5,875 0'W EGRWNDSTORASE TANK m NOTINWE iJ qO 101 NMP Imo m NOTINWE 3,100 tOY CHLIXUETWWEP ESM 6,m0 I.PLGIOUNDSNIROGE TANK NOTIN WE SWOK3 METHYLENECNLDwDE Imo 1yX OBSF ATQNWE NKSTAL BYIMMBLETAIMYE9 q NOTINWE 6.Om top KUNINUMSULFATE 1100 e) TEXOND Bm0 100 TINJ°AL tfi,@0 ® CHEMICAL LOKDNGIUNLOADING SO MIT W WE IKW I1D TINJ°AL 16.@0 TRAISFFAARFA R IOETONE O,mO Itl NOT IN WE 16.'X0 )1 MEK(L&TNYIEMYLKET 10190 t,a CmiDmUMSULFATE 1q) NOTES 75 MEK 10 W0 RI CXROME aW0 1)P OERNED FROM XAMBLET IHAYFS CO. 78 M.EK tO WO pp CHROLF 3,W0 FACLLRV RECOPDSGTFD tv3tLW.iNBLCOM,EHT9 >) XYLENE tO mO 1M NLLTI 2,W0 WY IMVESWSE°UEN%Y BEEN ORANGES OR WVEryNEM D. OnERWSSMINERAI.SPIRTSR;o CHESTERTON yDq 2)ALL LOCATIONS AND DINEI°IONSOF SITE FIGURE 2-3 ,S GLY OLETNEREB tO mO R11 TIMIFAL 1)50 MATIlliF9AREMPP09WTEONLV. KI $TOTD D`RAN '°� 45 °° STORAGE TANK PLAN S, TETT SOLIMN to,WO K, iEiRNIYpIMFLIMN fo,WO HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SCALE FEET'°°°°" SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. ' . 1 1 1 1 e 0 h ' SECTION 3 3.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING SITE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AND DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE I SCOPE The following is a summary of the existing environmental monitoring data collected at the Site. Details of existing data were presented in Section 4.0 of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (ABB-ES, 1991). Groundwater quality data were derived by the H&H staff as part of their underground flammable liquid storage tank farm monitoring program. Soil, sediment, groundwater, and air quality data were gathered by Investigations conducted at the Site by HLA in 1989 and 1990. Information and data indicate that there have been releases of hazardous materials to soils and groundwater at the Site. 3.1 H&H MONITORING In conjunction with the underground tank farm permitting and construction processes in the early 1980s, the Salem Conservation Commission required that at least six groundwater observation wells be installed at the Site by H&H and that H&H sample the wells and retain results of analyses at the Site. The well construction and sampling and analysis programs were designed to detect gross contamination potentially resulting from the underground storage tank farm. Certain initial and subsequent analyses of groundwater samples collected from the H&H observation wells detected the presence of certain of the ' compounds that were stored in the tanks. The groundwater quality data available from the H&H sampling and analysis conducted from December 1983 through July 1989 is presented in Appendix G of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (ABB-ES, 1991). Because of the observation well construction and the methodology of the sampling and analysis program, it is difficult to evaluate the significance of the resulting data; compounds detected could be a result of tank leakage or of surficial spillage and runoff into the observation wells. In addition, the sampling and analytical protocols did not conform to EPA methods. bpi 09123.03 3-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 3 3.2 HLA 1989 INVESTIGATION , The 1989 HLA field investigation included the installation of six groundwater monitoring wells (HLA-1 through HLA-6) and advancement of seven test borings (Figure 3-1). HLA also collected soil, sediment, groundwater and air samples for laboratory analysis of priority pollutant compounds and selected other parameters including hexavalent chromium, herbicides, total organic carbon (TOC), total organic halide (TOX), and TPH from various locations around the Site (Figure 3-1). In addition, groundwater samples were collected for laboratory analysis for priority pollutant compounds and other selected parameters, including TPH, TOC, TOX, and hexavalent chromium, from the pre-existing groundwater observation ' wells located around the active underground storage tank farm. Results of analyses of groundwater samples collected from the H&H observation wells and HLA-4 , (located in the area of active and former underground flammable storage tank farms) indicated the presence of VOCs. Total VOC concentrations ranged from approximately 40 ug/I to approximately 6000 ug/I in these wells. Concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), 1,1,14richloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and TCE were detected above Massachusetts Maximum Contaminant Levels (MMCLs). VOCs were not detected in the groundwater samples collected from the other on-site HLA monitoring wells or from the on-site production well which is located in the vicinity of the active underground storage tank farm. Results of analyses of groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells HLA-3 and HLA-6 indicated the presence of hexavalent chromium at concentrations of 5.6 and 3.7 mg/I, respectively. Results of analyses of sediment samples collected at several locations from the Mill Pond tidal flat Indicated the presence of total chromium. Concentrations ranging from 481 mg/kg at location MUD FLAT 3 to 12,500 mg/kg at location DISCHARGE POINT 2 were detected. In addition, a concentration of 0.54 mg/kg hexavalent chromium was detected at location DISCHARGE POINT 2. Results of analysis of the MUD FLAT 1 sample also indicated the presence of polynuclear aromatic , hydrocarbons (PAHs) and several VOCs including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, 1,2- DCE and 1,1-DCA. bp109123.03 3-2 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' 1 SECTION 3 Results of analysis of a greenish stained surficial soil sample collected in the area between Building J and Mill Pond Indicated the presence of total chromium at a concentration of 11,500 mg/kg and hexavalent chromium at a concentration of 5.1 mg/kg. ' Results of analysis of soil samples indicated the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at two locations. A concentration of 10 mg/kg was detected in surficial soil collected from behind Building J and a concentration of 0.94 mg/kg in the MUD FLAT 2 location. PCBs were not detected from analysis of the other soil or sediment samples. Results of analyses of soil samples collected from soil borings behind the former garage (Building C) location indicated the presence of low concentrations of several isomers of dioxins and furans. Isomers` fdetected included OCDD, OCDF, HPCDD, HXCDF, and HPCDF at concentrations ranging from 0.50 to 43.7 ug/kg. No isomers of TCDD or TCDF were detected. Analysis of soil and groundwater samples collected from HLA-5 in the area of the former laboratory septic waste disposal system did not detect VOCs or elevated concentrations of other analytes with the exception of 5.6 mg/I hexavalent chromium detected in groundwater. ' Air-sampling data did not reveal airborne chromium or hexavalent chromium exceeding regulatory standards. 3.3 HLA 1991 SOIL SAMPLING ' On January 13, 1991, HLA collected sic soil samples for laboratory analysis of VOC content from the area of the active underground storage tank farm. The soil samples were collected after routine precision tank testing by Global Tank Testing had indicated a potential leak in the tank piping system for Tank Nos.74, 75, and 76. The piping system was exposed by excavation of the concrete pad and the piping system examined. Based on staining of soils, it was evident that the tank check valve on Tank No. 76 had been leaking. Failure of the precision tests by Tank Nos. 74 and 75 was due to the piping bp109123.03 3-3 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 3 being bowed, thereby retaining air in the piping so that a false positive result was recorded during the r precision test. The valve on Tank No. 76 was replaced, and the tank subsequently passed re- performance of the precision test. Soil samples were collected from beneath the concrete surface at the 0 to 3 feet below ground surface ' Interval above Tank,Nos. 74, 75, and 76; the samples were analyzed for VOCs. Three soil samples were collected above Tank No. 76 (Samples 304, 305, and 306), one soil sample was collected above Tank No. 75 (Sample 303), and two soil samples were collected above Tank No. 74 (Samples 301 and 302). A trip blank was also submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs. Results of laboratory analysis of the soil samples indicated the presence of VOCs above the three tanks. Concentrations of 9,600 ug/kg total xylenes and 500 ug/kg ethylbenzene were detected in Sample 304, 15 ug/kg PCE, 6 ug/kg TCE, and 22 ug/kg total xylenes in Sample 305 and 1,200 ug/kg total xylenes in Sample 306, all collected above Tank No. 76. No VOCs were detected in Sample 303. Concentrations of 280 ug/kg methyl ethyl ketone (MEK, aka 2-butanone) and 400 ug/kg acetone in Sample 301, and 7 ug/kg PCE, 6 ug/kg total xylenes, and 18 ug/kg acetone in Sample 302 were detected above Tank No. 74. No VOCs were detected in the trip blank. The results of analyses of these samples indicate the presence of total xylenes and ethylbenzene in soils , above Tank No. 76 and low concentrations of other compounds above Tank No. 76 and Tank No. 74. The results indicate that the concentration distribution of these compounds is not widespread and suggests that no significant spill or release has occurred. The presence of these VOCs in soil is likely a result of limited surficial spillage affecting shallow soils beneath the slab. , 3.4 PHASE I - LSI SCOPE OF WORK The basic objectives of a Phase I - LSI are presented in the MCP at 310 CMR 40.543(1). The results of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment (ABB-ES, 1991) indicated that the Site is a disposal site. The , LSI was designed to provide information necessary to classify the Site pursuant to 310 CMR 40.544. bp109123.03 3-4 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 3 The LSI was not intended to provide a comprehensive investigation of conditions, but to build upon the information previously assembled to provide enough information to classify the Site and to provide the necessary information to develop a Phase II scope of work. Specific objectives of the LSI were: To assess the source areas of the release(s) at the Site considering the evidence of spills, present and former aboveground tanks and underground storage tanks, septic systems, process drainage, storm drainage, and potential airborne dust deposition; Assess the potential routes and magnitude of exposure to receptors in the Mill Pond ' environment; . Assess the routes of migration and extent of VOC groundwater contamination in current and former solvent storage areas; and Assess the extent of surficial soil contamination on the east side of Building I. Additional Investigation was planned to fill data gaps to comply with MCP Phase I - Limited Site Investigation and Disposal Site Classification Requirements, including: The collection and laboratory analysis of surface water and sediment samples from Mill i� Pond. The purpose of obtaining such data was to better characterize the contaminant 1� distribution in both surface water and sediments associated with Mill Pond, so that a comparison to Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) and an initial evaluation of risk to the aquatic environment could be performed. Good faith efforts were made to obtain access to conduct sampling of the Mill Pond environment from the adjacent landowners. Access was obtained from New England Power Company (north and northwest of the Site), but not from the MBTA (north and northeast of the site). bp109123.03 3-5 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 3 Additional hydraulic and hydrogeologic investigation was required to better evaluate migration pathways for groundwater and surface water in the vicinity of the Site, including a more detailed evaluation of (1) groundwater flow beneath the Site; (2) the relationship between Site groundwater and Mill Pond; and (3) the potential tidal influences on Site groundwater flow and the groundwater/surface water relationship. The collection of additional soil and groundwater quality data in the area of Buildings H and L to confirm the presence and, If present, to evaluate the source and extent of VOC contamination. The scope of the investigation included the installation of one properly designed groundwater monitoring well in the area of the existing H&H observation wells to replace the observation wells and to provide accurate groundwater quality data in that location. The investigation also included the installation of monitoring wells between Buildings L and H near that former underground storage tank area and north of Building H. The collection of additional soil and groundwater quality data in the area of the former , sanitary septic system adjacent to Building B to evaluate it this septic system has been a source of release to the environment. The collection of additional soil and groundwater data was needed in the area north of Building A between the former underground storage tank location and Mill Pond to evaluate If a release occurred in that former underground storage tank area. The collection of additional soil and groundwater data from the area east of Buildings G and J (between the main manufacturing building and Mill Pond). These locations were , selected to help evaluate groundwater flow direction and the potential migration pathways of VOCs and chromium releases detected at other locations within the Site. Soil samples from these areas were collected to evaluate if observed surficial stained soils have impacted soil or groundwater quality at depth. bp109123.03 3-6 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. e SECTION 3 ! . The collection of additional surficial soil samples in the area of stained soils east of Building I for laboratory analysis of 13 priority pollutant metals, hexavalent chromium, and PCBs. The collection of this data was necessary to evaluate the potential direct contact exposure to hazardous materials present at the surface of the Site. bp109123.03 3-7 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. x x 'ARDnD / MILLPOND _ ,/_ CRTTCULVERTm % 2 $WTH PNEP �% OHD i % DSCWfiGE] % MUD FUL] MUD FUic 06(:WAGE! DATE ♦ ♦ oLcwaGE] vuvE ♦ O x BLDG H 031 BLDG.I % x m m ` BIDD i BIOG.G m HUBORx7 Hili 44444444444444444-Hiii444ii4iiii41i11i4iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii441Lyy-Hiiiii+i4+iiii44ii, BLDG HUWEllz RMURGADBIDING yHU wEu% w�a.........._ 0-1—xB Ale m m II 010G.E I OFAP BLCG.L N]H)U'GATEp HU Bp,P(INGcL 1 10CiO HEX] MUD FLAT Y ¢ HU BOPIHGK XUW LL] :::::::--T ppA WELLI ♦ XU BwNHGS¢ f" lGO N1HU BOPINGU8OWNG1 I H5N] x l UW S fANCPEiE PAD MUDFUT WATER SUCRV WELL HH O Hugs p —x— —x— —x [:i� BUIL REM BLDG K % BLDG.O % BLDC.A MN x `T` LEGEMIL U SO 160 MONTORING WELL SOIL BORING SCALE FEET . O EIUSTINGOBSERVATION WELL NOTES: FIGURE 3-1 1) PLAN DERIVED FROM NAMBLET♦ HAVES CO. HLA FIELD INVESTIGATION ♦ SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION FACILITYFA �HECORDS.HU1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AFTER p LOCATION PLAN M AIR SAMPLING LOCATION z) ALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF SITE HAM BLET SL HAYES FACILITY FEATURES AND SAMPLING POINTS ARE x SURRCIALSOIL SAMPLING LOCATION APPROMMATE ONLY. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. � � � �• r +wn � w � � i■. a rr � � � [� � A o e Z o ' W h 1 ' SECTION 4 ' 4.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION ABB-ES conducted a field investigation of the Site from April 22 to October 17, 1991. Field activities were conducted in accordance with a Project Operations Plan (POP) and site Health and Safety Plan (HASP) prepared by ABB-ES as amended in response to the inability after good faith negotiations, to obtain access to adjacent MBTA property. The objectives of the field investigation were outlined in Section 3.0. These objectives were accomplished through several tasks conducted concurrently during the field program. These tasks included: soil borings;' ' . subsurface soil sampling; field:screening of soil samples; monitoring well installation and well development; grountlwater sampling; ' surficlal soil sampling; surface water sampling; sediment sampling; relative elevation survey; piezometer and surface water stake installation; water level"measurements The methodology for these tasks is summarized in the remainder of Section 4.0. Figure 4-1 depicts the locations of the field investigation points for this program. 4.1 SOIL BORING PROCEDURES ' ABB-ES supervised the completion of seven on-site soil borings from April 22 to April 25, 1991. The objectives of the boring program were to enable physical characterization of subsurface soils, sampling of subsurface soils for chemical characterization purposes, and installation of monitoring wells in the borings. Geologic, Inc. (GeoLogic) of Watertown, Massachusetts was subcontracted to execute the ' bp109123.04 4-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1 SECTION 4 ' borings and install and develop the monitoring wells. Figure 5-1 depicts the locations of the completed ' borings and well installations. Appendix B contains soil boring logs with well completion details for the seven borings. The borings were located as follows (Figure 4-1): , Near existing observation well H&H 3 south of Building L (ABB-1), to provide , representative and accurate groundwater quality data in the area of the active underground storage tank farm; Between Buildings H and L, near the location of former solvent underground storage tank farm (ABB-2), to evaluate groundwater quality in the area between the current and ' former solvent underground storage tank farm; Between Buildings H and I (ABB3), to evaluate the presence or absence of, and , potential for migration of, volatile organic compounds in groundwater between the ' former solvent underground storage tank farm location and Mill Pond; On the northeast side of Building A, adjacent to the former underground storage tank , farm area (ABB-4), to evaluate the presence or absence of soil or groundwater contamination in the area of the former underground storage tank farm; , Along the east side of the main manufacturing building between the building and Mill ' Pond (ABB-5, ABB-6), to define groundwater quality and flow beneath the eastern side of the Site; and , In the area of a former sanitary septic leaching field (ABB-7) adjacent to Building B. The borings were terminated at depths of 14 to 17 feet below the ground surface. In general, the borings were terminated at a depth of approximately 5 to 8 feet below the water table (water was , encountered at approximately 8 feet below ground surface). The soil borings were completed using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig. The borings were advanced using 4.5-inch-diameter hollow-stem augers. , bp109123.04 4-2 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 4 Soil samples were collected at each boring location to enable physical characterization of subsurface ' materials and to enable field screening for VOCs and laboratory analysis of selected analytes. Standard 2-foot penetration tests yielding split-spoon samples were conducted at each location. Continuous sampling was conducted in each boring. 1 The soils recovered from each split-spoon were visually classified by the ABB-ES geologist. A representative composite sample from each spoon was collected for on-site field screening. Each sample was stored in an 8-oz glass reference jar fitted with an aluminum foil seal and screw cap. Each ' sample reference jar was labeled with date of collection, boring location, and depth interval. The reference jar was used to perform headspace analysis of total VOCs using an portable photoionization ' detector. ' Soils samples were collected in accordance with the POP, based on the understanding of site conditions. Additional samples were collected based on the results of field screening and ' visual/olfactory observations (e.g., sample S-8 from ABB-1 exhibited petroleum odors and dark color and was submitted for TPH analysis). Selected soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis of Target Compound List VOCs via EPA Method 8240, TPH via EPA Method 418.1, total chromium via EPA Method 5010, and hexavalent chromium content via modified EPA Method 312B. Soil samples were submitted as follows: ABB•1 (S5,Se),AB82(S2,S-Bl ABB-,3:(S-1,'80,ABB-4(SS), ABB s(s-2, sal, ,Bas(SA) ABs-a(sal ABS-1 (S8),ABB.4 (S-5) ' TOTAL CHROMIUM ABB$(Si),ABB-5 (S3),ABB$(S9} HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM ' ABB3(S1),ABB-5(S3),ABM(S4} ' bp109123.04 4-3 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. . SECTION 4 , In addition, one rinsate blank was submitted for chromium analysis and a trip blank, two field rinsate 1 blanks and a duplicate sample were submitted for VOC analysis. All geotechnical apparatus (such as augers, rods, drill bits, casings) were steam-cleaned prior to use on- , site; between each location on-sfte; and prior to removal from the Site to remove visible contamination ' and soils. This reduced the potential for cross-contamination of samples from separate boring locations. The split-spoon sampler was cleaned by the ABB-ES geologist or the drillers before each sample was ' taken. The cleaning process consisted of initially rinsing the split-spoon sampler with potable water, washing the sampler with potable water and detergent (alconox or liquinox) and finally rinsing with , delonized water. Each sample collection apparatus (e.g. spatulas, spoons) was.decontaminated prior to each sample , collection using the process described above. , Drill cuttings, well purging and development water, decontamination materials and personal protective ' equipment, and the rinsate from the split-spoon cleaning were collected and containerized at the location of field activities. Containers were labeled with site location, date, boring or well number, depth interval and type of contents. At the conclusion of the field activities, appropriate characterization of ' containerized decontamination materials and drill cuttings was conducted, and proper off-site disposal was performed In accordance with Massachusetts and federal regulations. ' 4.2 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION/WELL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES ' ABB-ES supervised the Installation of monitoring wells following the completion of each of the seven soil ' borings. Figure 4.1 depicts the locations of the newly installed wells. Details of each well installation are included on the monitoring well construction diagrams in Appendix B. The purpose of the well installations was to enable groundwater quality sampling and piezometric surface determination in the ' locations where borings were advanced. bp109123.04 4-4 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , SECTION 4 ' Each well was constructed of a 2.0-Inch ID, 0.010-Inch slotted, Schedule 40 PVC well screen connected by flush-threaded Joints to a 2.0-inch ID Schedule 40 PVC riser. A 10-foot screened section was installed In each well. Well materials were steam-cleaned prior to installation and no tape, glue, or other solvent- containing materials were used during well construction. The annular space surrounding each well screen was packed with No. 4 silica filter sand from the base of the well screen to approximately one foot above the top of the well screen. A minimum of 1400t-thick bentonite seal was installed in the ' annular space above each well screen to prevent possible direct infiltration of surface water into the screened interval. The annular space above the bentonite seal was backfilled with silica sand to a depth of approximately two feet below the ground surface. A protective surface cover (either a 4-inch diameter ' steel standpipe equipped with a lock or a steel roadway box with an iron cap) was fitted over each completed well and cemented into place. Each well riser was fitted with a locking protective cap. These measures were designed to protect the wells from potential vandalism, and direct infiltration of surface water into the wells. ' 4.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES After development, and allowing one week for additional stabilization of each well, groundwater samples were collected on May 6, 1991 from each newly installed ABB-ES well and the existing HLA wells and submitted for laboratory analysis for TCL VOCs via EPA Method 8240. Groundwater samples were also collected for laboratory analysis of total chromium via EPA Method 6010 and hexavalent chromium content via EPA Method 312B from wells ABB-4, ABB-5, ABB6, ABB-7, HLA-3, and HLA-6. Groundwater samples were subsequently collected on August 1, 1991 from wells ABB-3 and HLA-2 for laboratory analysis of total chromium content. Prior to sampling at each location, the static water level and total depth of each well were measured and recorded on a groundwater sampling form. The standing water volume in each well was calculated. Then, at least three well volumes were purged from the wells to provide for collection of representative groundwater samples. All wells were purged by bailing and by evacuation with an ISCO portable peristaltic pump. All monitoring wells were sampled using a teflon or stainless steel bailer attached to a bp109123.04 4-5 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 4 ' dedicated nylon rope. Purging and sampling equipment was decontaminated prior to and between , sampling locations to prevent cross contamination of samples. The decontamination procedures Included an Alconox and water scrub, a potable water rinse, and a final rinse with deionized water. ' Following purging of each well volume, a groundwater sample was collected and field screened for pH, ' temperature, and conductivity. These measurements, along with the time of sample collection, and other sample characteristics, were recorded on the groundwater sampling forms. Samples for VOC analysis , were poured from the bailer Into precleaned 40-ml glass vials prepreserved with 1:1 hydrochloric acid (HCI). Two sample containers were collected for VOC analysis from each well location and submitted to the MADEP certified CIBA-GEIGY Corporate Environmental Testing Laboratory (ETL) of Toms River, New Jersey. The containers were labeled with date, time, sample location, sample number, analysis requested, and sample collector(s). Samples collected for total chromium analysis were field-filtered and , poured into bottles pre-preserved with nitric acid. Samples for total chromium analysis were submitted to the CIBA-GEIGY ETL. Samples collected for hexavalent chromium were field-filtered and submitted , the same day to Enseco-Erco Laboratory of Somerset, New Jersey. Groundwater samples collected from ABB-3 and HLA-2 for chromium analysis (via flame atomic absorption spectroscopy) were ' submitted to the CIBA-GEIGY Corporate Environmental Technology Analytical Chemistry Group in Greensboro, North Carolina. All samples were packed on ice and were delivered to the laboratories following chain-of-custody protocol. ' 4.4 GROUNDWATER FLOW EVALUATION ' ABB-ES installed two piezometer nests and one surface water stake in Mill Pond at locations indicated , on Figure 4-1. ABB-ES performed a relative elevation survey of each of the newly installed depth to groundwater/surface water observation points. Depth to water measurements were taken at all , monitoring well and surface water/piezometer locations during nine intervals within one high tide to low tide cycle. bp109123.04 4.6 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , SECTION 4 4.4.1 Surface Water Stake On August 29, 1991 one surface water elevation stake was installed In the center of Mill Pond northwest of the main office building (at location SW-3). The surface water stake is constructed of hard wood, ten feet long and approximately 1.0 inch square. The stake is labeled SW-3 and was driven approximately three and one-haft feet Into the sediment at the bottom of the Pond. ' 4.4.2 Piezometer Nests ' On August 29, 1991, two piezometer nests (each nest consists of one shallow and one deep piezometer) were installed in the center of the pond to evaluate the discharge/recharge relationship between surface water and groundwater at various points within Mill Pond and at various times during the tidal cycle. The locations of the piezometer pairs are indicated on Figure 4-1. The piezometers are constructed of 3/4-inch ID, PVC (shallow) or steel (deep) pipe, with a 9-inch slotted 1 section at the base. The base was capped and the slotted interval wrapped with geotechnical filter fabric to prevent infiltration of silt or clay into the piezometers. Shallow piezometers were driven to a depth of approximately three feet below the sediment bottom surface. Deep piezometers were driven approximately five feet below the sediment bottom surface. Piezometers were developed after installation by pumping with a battery-powered peristaltic pump. 4.4.3 Elevation SurveV On July 19, 1991 ABB-ES performed an elevation survey of each newly installed monitoring well relative ' to the existing Site observation point datum (HLA6; HLA, 1990). The relative elevation of each well riser, the rim of the casing or protective cover, and the ground surface was determined at each well location to an accuracy of 0.01 feet. bp109123.04 4-7 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 4 ' On September 6, 1991, ABB-ES performed an elevation survey of the piezometer pairs and surface water ' stakes relative to the existing relative elevation determined for Site monitoring wells. The relative elevations of the top of the stake and the piezometer risers were determined at each location. Table 4-1 , presents the relative elevation of each of the points used for the groundwater flow evaluation. The H&H wells were not used for the flow evaluation. ' 4.4.4 Water Level Measurements On September 18, 1991 ABB-ES performed depth to water measurements at all newly-installed and pre- existing monitoring wells, the piezometer pairs and surface water stake, and at monitoring wells on the , adjacent warehouseproperty. Measurements were collected through nine rounds at each of the 1 9 observation points from a period just past high tide, through the ebb tide to the period of low tide, until , the tide was starting to rise again. A summary of all measurements and determined elevations is presented in Appendix C. , 4.5 SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENT SAMPLING Surface water and sediment samples were collected on September 4, 1991 to characterize environmental conditions at Mill Pond and to aid in interpretation of potential site contaminant migration ' toward Mill Pond. Three surface water and sediment samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis for 13 priority pollutant metals via EPA inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and furnace , atomic absorption (AA) spectroscopy methods and hexavalent chromium via modified EPA Method 7195. In addition, all surface water samples were submitted for chloride analysis via EPA Method 300.0, and one sediment sample (SD-1) was submitted for dioxin/furan analysis via low resolution mass spectrometry. Surface water and sediment sample locations are indicated on Figure 4-1. Surface water , and sediment sample locations were selected to represent areas located adjacent to (SW-001 and SW- 002) and upstream (SW-003) of the Site. Surface water and sediment samples were re-collected on October 17, 1991 for analysis of hexavalent chromium. Samples were re-collected because the ' analytical laboratory had missed the holding time prescribed by the POP. Samples were re-collected from similar locations following identical sampling protocols as described below. , bp109123.04 4-8 06440-04 e 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' 1 ' SECTION 4 ' Surface water samples were collected at a point two-thirds the depth of the water column above the bottom surface to prevent collection of any waters directly from either the sediment/water interface or the water/air interface. Care was taken to ensure that upstream disturbances did not cause the collection of unrepresentative samples. The order of sample collection was from downstream locations toward upstream locations. Samples collected for analysis of priority pollutant metals were logged and transported to the CIBA-GEIGY ETL laboratory. Samples collected for analysis of hexavalent chromium were transported to NET Atlantic Laboratories (NET) of Bedford, Massachusetts. All sample shipment was performed following chain-of-custody procedures. Duplicate samples for hexavalent chromium and metals analysis were submitted to the laboratories. In addition, a field blank and a rinsate blank were ' also submitted for these parameters. ' Sediment samples were collected from the same locations and in the same sequence as the surface water samples (SD-1 through SD3). Sediment samples from below the surface water were collected with a non-contaminating sediment grab sampler. The basic sampling procedure was as follows: Sampling was conducted upstream of any disturbances in the stream caused by the ' sampler or sampling team. ' . Sediment samples were stored and shipped In wide-mouthed bottles with teflon or aluminum-lined screw caps. ' Prior to collecting each set of sediment samples, the sampling devices were ' decontaminated by using a thorough soap and water wash and a distilled water rinse. Sample containers were labeled to indicate sample date, time, location and depth. Samples were ' logged on field sample documents and transported to the specified laboratories following chain-of- custody protocol. Samples for priority pollutant metal analysis were submitted to CIBA-GEIGY ETL; the ' sample for dioxin/furan analysis was submitted to Enseco of West Sacramento, California; and the samples for hexavalent chromium analysis were submitted to NET of Bedford, Massachusetts. Duplicate ' bp109123.04 4-9 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 4 ' samples were submitted for polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans , (PCDDs/PCDFs), metals, PAHs, and hexavalent chromium analysis. Both field and rinsate blanks were also submitted for analysis of PCDDs/PCDFs, metals, and hexavalent chromium. ' 4.6 INVESTIGATION OF STAINED SOIL AREA EAST OF BUILDING I ' Surficial soil samples were collected on September 4, 1991 from the area of green-stained soil north of , Building I to better Identify the potential for direct human contact to contamination and to evaluate the extent of surficial soil contamination. Four surficial soil samples (SS-1 through SS-4) were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis for 13 priority pollutant metals via various EPA ICP and Furnace AA ' methods, hexavalent chromium via modified EPA Method 7195, and for PCBs via EPA Method 8080. On October 17, 1991, surficial soil samples were re-collected for laboratory analysis of hexavalent chromium ' due to holding time problems as discussed above. Samples were re-collected from the same locations by similar sampling methods as described below. Duplicate samples were collected for metals, ' hexavalent chromium, and PCB analysis. Field and rinsate blanks were also submitted for these parameters. A clean spatula was used to collect each surficial soil sample. Prior to sampling, surface vegetation, rocks, leaves, and debris were cleared from the sample point to allow for collection of a representative ' sample. Soil samples were collected from each location over a depth interval of 0 to 6 inches below ground surface. Soil samples were stored and shipped in wide-mouth glass bottles with teflon- or ' aluminum4ined screw caps. Samples were labeled to indicate sample number, date, time, sampler, and depth. Samples were logged on field sampling documents and transported to the project laboratories ' (CIBA-GEIGY ETL and NET) following chain-of-custody protocol. bp109123.04 4-10 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , TABLE 4-1 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATION POINT RELATIVE ELEVATIONS HAMBLET& HAYES FACILITY ' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS WELL NUMBER ELEVATION (1)(2)(3) PZ-1 S 93.82 ' PZ-11D 93.98 PZ-2S 94.19 PZ-21) 95.41 STAKE 94.08 ABB-1 99.43 ABB-2 100.17 ' ABB-3 99.44 ABB-4 99.91 ABB-5 99.35 ABB-6 100.98 ABB-7 99.45 HLA 6 100.45 HLA 3 100.12 BE 3 101.16 BE 5 102.95 ' BE 1 103.20 HLA 1 102.90 HLA 4 100.17 HLA 2 99.81 HLA 5 99.74 BE 4 102.68 NOTE: (1) Elevations are top of PVC; (2) Elevations of HLA and BE wells after HLA(1990); (3) HLA 6 used as benchmark for ABB-ES survey ' B, —x �X W UPDAD YAPS eftL WND gAVEATTOSGmmm WHWtt GATE VALVE M+4o AB" . 0 eea wreDm, +ABB-6 m%• • as BLDG. BLDG.H • I All" x` BLDG i BLDG c ET--1 A, ABB — AB&Y I li-li-I i1TiH+Fiiiiiiiiii�iiili liif�# DS'01 NUWEllt 0.VLPOAp 5101NG NU WELLe BIDG.D A_Ibx♦____Q.WHe HU SPELLa PUP PZ4%D Y BLDG.E BLDG.L t GATE M MfHl O MVIIio 1 1000 w/BDw XAWELLa _ HHd +xLAWEL0 �OOG ABB-1 HBH' 1N' UWFllS I CGNCHETE I WALED BAD ABBE SUPPLY W 50 BOLDING O Y pypG.K ABSLOG B x Wnc.e �Bj}7 nY5 PAIN T m� GATE wrooaw ---,X— .�x—x x 0 So 150 LEGEND: SCALE FEET ABB MONITORING WELL NOTES: 1)PLAN DERIVED FROM WIMBLET&HAYES CO. ABB PIEZOMETER LOCATION FACILITY RECORDS SAMPLING LOCATIONS AFTER HLA(1990) ABB SURFACE SaLSAMPLE R)ALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF SITE FIGURE 4-1 FEATURES AND SAMPLING POINTS ARE • SURFACE WATER STAKE APPROMMATE ONLY. ABB-ES FIELD INVESTIGATION LOCATION PLAN + NLA MONITORING WELL PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION O EXISTING INN OBSERVATION WELL HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY m SURFACE WATEA/SEDIMENT SAMPLE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Will m i 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 �; Z 1 0 W H SECTION 5 5.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY Information regarding Site geology and hydrogeology was derived from the ABB-ES field investigation activities as described in Section 4.0. The following discussion is supplemented by the information derived from previous investigations by HLA and Bewick Associates at the Site and adjacent property. 5.1 GEOLOGY In general, the observations made by ABB-ES indicate the presence of varying thicknesses and types of fill materials at almost all areas of the Site. Soils underlying fill materials are a wide variety of clays, silts and sands commonly interbedded on a centimeter scale. Schematic geologic cross sections were developed based upon review of the boring data. The location of soil borings and cross section lines are indicated on Figure 5-1. The schematic cross sections are presented as Figures 5-2, 5-3, and 5-4. Review of the boring data suggests that the soils beneath the Site are likely a result of artificial filling and fluvial and estuarine depositional processes superimposed on a glaciofluvial and glaciomarine framework. Observations at each boring location are as follows: ABB-1: This boring was located adjacent to the current underground storage tank farm in close proximity to H&H observation well 2. Soils recovered from this location Indicate the consistent presence of brown medium to coarse sand and gravel to a depth of approximately 14 feet below . ground surface. These materials are likely the fill materials installed during tank farm construction. At the base of the boring (14 to 16 feet), a hydrocarbon odor and a black discoloration were observed. ABB-2: This boring was located directly adjacent to the railroad tracks between Buildings H and L, approximately 50 feet north of well HLA-4. This location was also within ten feet of the former underground tanks beneath Building H. Fill materials were encountered from ground surface to a depth of approximately eight feet. Brown to black, mostly coarse sands and gravels, including cinders and coal slag near the surface were observed. Native materials below eight feet ranged I� from interbedded fine to coarse sand and gravel to mostly coarse sand with gravelly layers. bp109123.05 5-1 06440-04 01/15/92 �, ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 5 ABB3: This boring was advanced in the area between the spray dryer building (Building 1) and Building H. Soils retrieved from 0 to 8 feet below the pavement at this location consisted of a fine to coarse sand and gravel fill with a significant amount (three to five feet thick) of dark brown to black, mostly fine grained coal ash with coal fragments and various other clinkers and objects likely a result of railroad related fill. Native deposits below the fill consisted of fine sands and peat and Interbedded clay, silt and fine to medium sands with a strong swamp gas odor. ABB-4: This boring was advanced at the northwestern edge of the pavement adjacent to Building A. Sand and gravel fill were observed from zero to six feet below ground surface at this location. Native deposits consisted of red-brown to predominantly grey,interbedded silts and fine, medium and coarse sands. A swamp gas odor was noted in soils from the saturated zone. ABB-5: This boring was advanced behind the main manufacturing building at the southern end near the spray dryer building (Building 1). Fill materials consisting of sands and gravels were encountered to a depth of approximately six feet below ground surface. Interbedded silt and fine to coarse sand with varying amounts of gravel lenses and organic layers were encountered below the fill. ABB-6: This boring was located behind the main manufacturing building at the northeast corner of the Site. Fill was absent at location ABB-6. Soils observed consisted mainly of orange-brown n to brown medium to coarse sands with some silt and minor amounts of gravel. ABB-7: This boring was located at the northern end of the laboratory (Building B) in the suspected area of a former sanitary septic system (ABB-ES, 1991). Fill materials consisting of sands and gravels with minor coal and ash fragments were encountered to a depth of approximately six feet below ground surface. Well-graded brown fine to coarse sands with minor sift and gravel comprised the native materials below the fill. bp109123.05 5-2 06440-04 i 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 5 The schematic cross section views of subsurface conditions (Figures 5-2, 5-3, and 5-4) suggest that the Site Is underlain by varying thicknesses of fill materials deposited during grading and expansion of the Site. The pre-fill sediments appear to be dominated by interbedded organic silts, sands and gravels (likely interfluvial/estuarine deposits associated with Mill Pond) to the north and east in the area beneath and adjacent to the current MITI Pond location and interbedded sand and gravel (glacioflwial) deposits to the south and west. It appears that a pre-fill topographic high of glaclofluvial deposits exists beneath the area of ABB-6 at the northeastern margin of the manufacturing building (Figure 5-1). This topographic high suggests a ridge of glacioflwial deposits trending northeast/southwest and extending from the southwestern portion of the site toward the east. This ridge, or tongue, of fluvial sediments is flanked by finer-grained and organic sediments to the east and west which likely represent slackwater fluvial deposits. 5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY ABB-ES collected depth-to-water measurements at each of the water level observation points as described in Section 4.0. These data were combined with the relative elevation data for each observation point to Identify a relative elevation of the groundwater/surface water level. The relative groundwater elevation data were plotted to develop a piezometric surface map and to allow evaluation of groundwater flow direction. Figure 5-5 presents the piezometric surface as measured during low tide on September 18, 1991. ABB-ES performed nine complete rounds of water level measurements at each observation point on September 18, 1991. Each round consisted of collection of the head elevation at all of the observation points. Each round presents a distribution of head elevations consistent with elevations depicted on Figure 5-5. Regionally, groundwater beneath the Site is expected to flow northeasterly, from upland areas southwest of the Site toward Salem Harbor likely following the former South River channel (refer to Figure 1-1). Equipotential contours mapped in Figure 5-5 indicate a northeasterly component of groundwater flow, ' consistent with the direction of regional flow. This pattern, however, is modified locally by two prominent features: Mill Pond and an apparent groundwater mound (as measured in wells ABB-5, ABB-3, and HLA- 3) positioned In the east-central portion of the Site beneath Buildings J and I. Groundwater moves bp109123.05 5.3 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 5 radially from the mound before conforming with regional flow. The source of the piezometric mound is unclear at this time. Along the northwestern and northern margins of the Site, shallow groundwater likely discharges to Mill Pond. Groundwater from the west of the Site is deflected to the north and south by the groundwater mound. The piezometric surface did not change significantly in the Site monitoring wells during the course of the nine tidal sequence measurements performed on September 18, 1991. The water level in Mill Pond, as measured at the surface water stake, decreased only 0.05 feet during the six hours of ebb tide that measurements were collected. Head measurements at each piezometer pair consistently indicated a small difference between the shallow and deeper piezometers (Appendix C). A greater head elevation �. was observed in the deeper piezometer at each location suggesting that groundwater was discharging to the pond during the time of measurements. i l bp109123.05 5-4 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. III-• III I— ,VIII., � � II� �. �� I� �' � � I�\ ill ' � II� X— X_ X YA0 YARD MILLPOND CULVERT TO '4— 'X� BOUMRNER �.%�. Cor T +.x GE VALVE ABB-5 C Cj ItI ABB-6 °9° wBB'' N BIW.I BLW ` ABS-3 BIW.J % __ � ULW.G HLA BGRiNm+ AB&R 4 iii 444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 11-444444444444 4444411114144444444+� eLW.G nuwsuz x+UwAGs;uxc Xu wELL% HI;L. 1 F-L W.I 1 HFpR xs.s XNxbi GATE 00 O 9 1 + XU WC BWi . UA LLi` r---OGC ' - WH p +NU WEIII xu WRL.. nUOURwGs+ Xu eoxw wAsonwcz xuweue AB&1 B WxcREre vnG w%rex BE•1 ABB-4 sw L BEd —z— —z— —x BU1Dl- 4 i xLW N ._% KEG ULW% AB&7 L N x cArE X 0 80 150 A SE-3 SCALE FEET I EGEN11• ABB MONITORING WELL TORR ABB PIEZOMETER LOCATION NOS` 1r YL wroVEU ry HNFU MB RE EEATYREO ARE AVGRDAUATE MLX. + HLA MONITORING WELL ZWEVUN OWVEB FMNNY LET NNAVO CB.1=g RUMU.eML0.NBLW1TpIBAFTER N4 VIM HLA SOL BORNG FIGURE 5-1 0 EpsTimH&H GBsERvAnomWELL CROSS SECTION LOCATION PLAN A IIIIIIIIIIIIA' CROSS SECTIONLINES �BE-4 PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. 105 A A' lb PO .tom •� Q00 100 FILL MILL SAND,GRAVEL, POND ASH,BOULDERS ? z O a 95 ? Lu J ' W W W IWL 7 gLEGEND INTERBEDDED INTERBEDDED Ir 90 ORGANIC MSC. GROUND SAND q SAND WITH SURFACE &GRAVEL SILT&GRAVEL SCREENED INTERVAL BOTTOM OF 85 BORING 0 SO �r1 HORIZONTAL SCALE (FEET) 80 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION:10X MTC•MEDIUM TO COARSE NOTE:ALL STRATIGRAPHIC CONTACTS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. FIGURE 5-2 SCHEMATIC GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION A-A' A Mill ABB Environmental PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION hUV Services Inc. HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY ASIA BROWN BOVERI SALEM, MA r =1 M ,No 1-M so I fm j" M M am Im M an' 00 we so am 105 139 B P011 P001 �p_A�' P00 100- c�P FILL SAND,GRAVEL, 95 ASH,CINDERS W g>to 7 W� Q W INTERBEDDED 90 ORGANIC SAND WITH SILT&CLAY INTERBEDDED M/C SAND &GRAVEL LEGEND 85- GROUND SURFACE SCREENED INTERVAL BOTTOM OF SO BORING 0 50 HORIZONTAL SCALE (FEET) VERTICAL EXAGGERA71ON:10% MSC•MEDIUM TO COARSE NOTE:ALL STRATIGRAPHIC CONTACTS ARE APPRO%IMATE ONLY. FIGURE 5-3 ABB Environmental SCHEMATIC GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION B-B' services Inc. PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION ASIA BROWN BOVERI HAMBLET&HAYES FACILITY SALEM MA C C, 105 p00fo PO�h Q00� p00:L 100 MISCELLANEOUS FILL SAND,GRAVEL, O CINDERS,ASH, a 95 BOULDERS LU JW LU ,M > L g XI[WfrERBEDDEDINTERBEDDED LEGEND ¢ 90 ORGANIC SAND WITH GROUND SILT,CLAY SURFACE &GRAVEL INTERBEDDED SCREENED MIC INTERVAL SAND BOTTOM OF &GRAVEL BORING O w HORIZONTAL SCALE (FEET) VERTICAL EXAGGERATION:NIX WC•MEDIUM TO COARSE NOTE:ALL STRATIGRAPNC CONTACTS ARE APPROIUMATE ONLY. FIGURE 5-4 SCHEMATIC GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION C-C' ABB Environmental PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION Services Inc. HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY AREA BROWN SOVERI SALEM, MA am11111111 so ou ` go M WE r M ` 111110 M No r r IFi a wn m m m m WE m m m i m m _ X_ X' \ _ x RALLMAo / YAM GULWRTTO '�- —X BOUTH RNER WNMOT —X— MILL POND / %_MILLPOND 8911 WTE B,gt+4B 5-WA2 ABB-5 vuvE \ \ �p Q88.58 ] \ MIM•T91— ABB$ • LW 11 \ BLM H X 81.59 asR • ABB3 \ � � 02A7\ \ \ �x FT 92.5 \ .81.58 , aLoc ABBY I�� 4 444444444444 44444444444 444444444 4444i444 444444 444444 44444444444444444 eLoc.o HUWLLI MILRMUSOp 81.71 4. .L, 92 9_wx _._.. . OINLx] NLA WJF�ll6 9 BLDG.E I SHO.JrS T 92BLM..I I PFM �iB.OQBO.B1 Bf.SO MH oT��(NlE M/864 __V N4N] NU LL]L_..Yoo :Y.2 O ;�HLAWELLi 81.84 9 O X 91.58 NLA WELL] 91.5 ABB-': ERAo 91.5e 91.99 . 91 � _ _ WATER gE.l y sUBRLv 66 ABBI - WFLL 91. BEd T BQSf —i1 O MRS BLWK 91.89 — ---x -92, ABB-7 i BICC A � B AME / m•90.45 / x MR 91.67 % w1w. x' LEGEND, �1x.,- x' � I BOB 80 1B0 1 ABB MONITORING WELL BE-'3 SCALE FEET 81.81 q0'W ABB PIEZOMETER LOCATION 91.91 •• ]TWATERTABLE ELEVATIOxSMEMOF MWB "I.QVATI(MIN FEET •• ABB SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE YBMW6MATM ELEVAT 8MWLATE0 MUWATFA LEYELYEALRBIExT8 W0EM DMSINWWTEO.FWMJI7ICMWOR0WMATER LEVEMWYW= OU610KEBOBS YOf'O NIEO WRATTRETIYE MASARMEMSWEREYME W ALL ELEVkT M•60SMNMABSUYFOOAIW(TW-1WRTEAABIM0 BY..OFq • SURFACE WATER STAKE 11MWMATER'B MARE:YTERMUTOBLIWE UTAW BMDI: RMOW RMEMC UR6ATB:OMMMERE WFERMWAR LWBMRWECO DR MYYMYFRMTTRMEI WSMIMllATER COMOUMAMUY6Y]IIOOli1E0W MO4SOTMRO AOYFEfl COMORIOMMO MIQOMAL FLOW. IB.A MONITORING WELL WCOIITOYM WFRE0.0TE0 RLq ORO1MOWA1611 ElEYAIIOMIN WFLY WMOII WERF6REFNM AGM891XE WAIFRTMLE ]T KL RIOSFATY WIWSMO WFE FFATUR0M6AWROfl`fm LY. BEWICK MONITORING WELL W•TETNNIOEYEFp WpYxAYOLETe WrMca FAWIm RaoxM 0. NI.AsaRING LBaeNG FIGURE 5-5 OBSERVATION PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR PLAN O EnsnNGB �BE, PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION WATER TABLE CONTOUR 9241 HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY (91.60) WATER TABLE ELEVEVATKNI SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �� GROUDWATER FLOW DIRECTION ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. 0 z 0 W N ' SECTION 6 6.0 RESULTS OF FIELD SCREENING AND LABORATORY ANALYSES ABB-ES performed the field screening of soils retrieved during soil boring program, and collected surficial and subsurficial soils, groundwater, surface water and sediments for laboratory analysis. The ' methodology for and locations of samples collected are described in detail in Section 4.0. Laboratory analytical reports are presented in Appendix D. 6.1 RESULTS OF SUBSURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLING Subsurficial soils retrieved during the soil boring program were field screened and selected samples were submitted for laboratory analysis as discussed in Section 4.0. 6.1.1 Field Screeninc All soil samples retrieved from split-spoon sampling intervals were field screened for total volatile organic vapor content with a portable organic vapor meter (OVM) as measured in the headspace of sealed glass soil sample jars. The OVM uses a photoionization detector (PID) to measure relative concentrations ' (referenced to an isobutylene standard) reported in parts-per-million (ppm) of VOCs detected in the headspace of each sealed sample jar. OVM readings of headspace vapor cannot be directly related to quantitative concentrations of VOCs present in the soil sample, but can be indicative of the qualitative presence and degree of VOCs contained in the soil. The results of field screening at each location are reported on the boring logs in Appendix B and are summarized as follows: ABB-1: Field screening of the soils did not suggest the presence of any significant VOCs, from ' the surface to a depth of 14 feet. Screening of the soil retrieved from the 14 to 16 foot interval Indicated 72 ppm VOCs corresponding to the observations of a hydrocarbon odor and dark 1 discoloration. bp109123.06 6-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 6 ' ABB-2: Field screening detected elevated VOC levels from the initial interval directly beneath the , pavement to the base of the boring (16 feet). Levels were highest (approximately 1500 ppm) directly beneath the pavement, decreased with depth, and then increased at the water table (approximately 8 feet below ground surface) and remained elevated (approximately 1000 to 1200 ppm) to the bottom of the boring. , ABB-3: Field screening detected VOCs near the surface 0 to 2 feet below rad t 4 _ e a t0 m. 9 ( grade) PP These levels decreased with depth until groundwater was encountered. A level of 194 ppm was , also observed at the depth of the water table (approximately 8 feet); levels decreased below the water table. ABB-4: Field screening did not detect VOCs in soils collected above the water table. A petroleum odor was noticed in soils retrieved from below the water table from eight to sixteen feet below ground surface. VOC vapors were detected in these sampling intervals at levels from , 139 to 247 ppm. ABB-5: Field screening detected the highest level of VOCs (540 ppm) in the boring at the 2 to 4 ' foot below ground surface interval, and levels ranging from 18 to 103 ppm in each of the other samples. No consistent pattern for VOC distribution is evident from the field screening results. , ABB-6: Field screening of soils recovered from ABB-6 during drilling did not indicate the ' presence of VOC vapors. ABB-7: Field screening did not indicate the presence of VOC vapors in these soils. A coarser layer of sands and gravels at approximately 3 to 4 feet below ground surface was the only , possible evidence of a former septic system leaching field. bp109123.06 6-2 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , SECTION 6 ' 6.1.2 Laboratory Analysis of Subsurface Soil Samples �. Selected soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. Soils samples were collected as described in Section 4.0. The results of analyses of subsurface soil samples are presented in Table 6-1. Results of laboratory analysis detected VOCs in soil from borings ABB-2 and ABB-3. Compounds detected included 1,1,1-TCA, PCE, TCE, trans-1,2-DCE, ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylenes. VOCs were detected at both shallow intervals (S-2; 2.5 to 4.5 feet below ground surface) and at the water table (S-5; 8.5 to 10.5 feet below ground surface) from ABB-2. VOCs were detected in S-2 (2.5 to 4.5 feet below ground surface) from ABB-3. No other samples were submitted for laboratory analysis from ABB- 3. VOC concentrations were detected below practical quantitation levels in soil from ABB-1 and ' ABB-5. VOCs were not detected in the other four soil samples submitted for analysis (cable 6-1). Chromium was detected in samples from ABB-3 (S-1; 810 mg/kg), ABB-5 (S-3; 1700 mg/kg), and ABB-6 (S-4; 11 mg/kg). Hexavalent chromium was not detected in these subsurficial soil samples. A concentration of 450 mg/kg TPH was detected in sample S-8 from ABB-1 collected from the 14.5 to 16.5 below ground surface interval. This depth corresponds to the depth where the discoloration of soils ' was observed. A concentration of 900 mg/kg TPH was detected in sample S-5 from ABB-4 collected from the observed water table interface. ' 6.2 RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Groundwater samples were collected from each of the seven newly installed ABB-ES wells and the six pre-existing HLA wells for laboratory analysis on May 6, 1991. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 6-2. ' bp109123.06 6-3 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 6 6.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds ' Several VOCs were detected In groundwater from ABB-2, ABB-3, and ABB-5. The highest concentrations were detected at ABB-2 (8.1 mg/I methylene chloride; 1.8 mg/I 1,2-DCE; 82 mg/I 1,1,1- TCA; 17 mg/I PCE; 26 mg/I TCE; 11 mg/I toluene; 3.7 mg/I ethylbenzene; and 25 mg/I xylenes). , Results at the other locations indicated significantly lower concentrations of VOCs. Toluene (6.9 mg/1) was the only VOC detected at ABB-4. VOCs were not detected from ABB-6 and ABB-7. The distribution ' of VOC concentrations is presented graphically in Figures 6-1, 6-2, and 6-3. Massachusetts Maximum Contaminant Levels (MMCLs) for drinking water were exceeded for TCE and , PCE in groundwater at several locations (Table 6-2). Other MMCLs were exceeded including toluene at ABB-4; vinyl chloride at HLA-6; 1,1,1,TCA at ABB-5; and several compounds at ABB-2. 6.2.2 Chromium , Low concentrations of total chromium were detected from analysis of groundwater collected from ABB-4, , ABB-5, ABB-6, ABB-7, HLA-5, and HLA-6 (maximum of 66 ug/1). Hexavalent chromium was not detected from analysis of any of these samples. A concentration of 5.1 mg/I total chromium and 5.5 mg/I hexavalent chromium was detected from analysis of groundwater from HLA-3. These results suggest ' that all of the chromium present in groundwater at HLA-3 is in the hexavalent state. The detection of a higher concentration of hexavalent chromium than total chromium suggests uncertainty in the analytical ' quantitation of the hexavalent chromium species. A distinct green discoloration of the groundwater was observed during sampling at ABB-3 and HLA-2. Foaming was also observed when these two wells were purged prior to sampling. The pH at ' both locations was field measured at approximately 3.5, and field conductivity measurements were between 5000 and 9000 umhos/cm. Groundwater from each of these wells was subsequently resampled on August 1, 1991 and analyzed for the presence of total chromium. Concentrations of 1700 ' mg/I were detected in groundwater from ABB-3 and 230 mg/I from HLA-2. Speciation of chromium with standard hexavalent chromium analytical methods could not be performed due to the interference of the , color of the sample. bpi 69123.06 6-4 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , SECTION 6 ' The Massachusetts Office of Research and Standards Guideline for total chromium was exceeded only at ABB-3, HLA-2 and HLA-3. There currently are no finalized Massachusetts drinking water standards ' (MMCLs) for total chromium. The MMCL for hexavalent chromium was exceeded only at HLA-3. ' 6.3 RESULTS OF SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING Surface water and sediment samples were collected from Mill Pond on September 4, 1991 and October 17, 1991. The results of laboratory analyses are presented in Tables 6-3 and 6-4, and laboratory reports are included in Appendix D. 6.3.1 Results of Surface Water Samolino Total chromium was detected above method detection limits at locations SW-001 and SW-002 at ' concentrations of 40 and 87 ug/I, respectively (Table 6-3). Total chromium was not detected at location 8W-003. Hexavalent chromium was detected in sample SW-001 at a concentration of 65 ug/I. However, hexavalent chromium was not identified in the duplicate analysis of SW-001 or in any of the other samples. The greater concentration of hexavalent chromium than total chromium detected in SW- 001 again suggests uncertainty regarding the analytical results regarding speciation (valence state) of chromium. Lead was detected at all three surface water sampling locations at concentrations of 42 ug/I (SW-001), 66 ug/I (SW-002) and 13 ug/I (SW-003). Zinc was also detected at all three sampling ' locations at low concentrations (26 to 37 ug/I). None of the other 13 metals were detected above POLs in the surface water samples. Chloride was detected at low concentrations in all three sampling locations (79 to 100 mg/1). ' bp109123.06 6-5 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 6 6.3.2 Results of Sediment Samolina , Of the 13 metals tested, mercury, antimony, copper, and thallium were not detected above POLs in the sediment samples collected (cable 6-4). Total chromium was detected at each of the sampling locations at concentrations of 7100 mg/kg at SD-001, 5300 mg/kg at SD-002, and 1000 mg/kg at SD-003. , Hexavalent chromium was detected at concentrations of 3.1 mg/kg, 2.1 mg/kg, and 1.8 mg/kg at locations SD-001, SD-002, and SD-003, respectively. Lead was detected at 700 mg/kg, 660 mg/kg, and ' 470 mg/kg at locations SD-001, SD-002, and SD-003, respectively. Arsenic was detected at concentrations of 9.4 mg/kg, 17 mg/kg, and 11 mg/kg in SD-001, SD-002, and SD-003, respectively. Zinc was detected at concentrations of 740 mg/kg, 580 mg/kg, and 590 mg/kg at SD-001, SD-002, and SD-003 respectively. The concentrations of other metals detected are listed in Table 6-4. Nine PAI-Is were detected from analysis of the sediment samples, but none were present in concentrations above the method detection limit (Table 6-4). Samples required dilution for quantitation ' due to matrix Interferences identified during analysis. Matrix interferences were likely a result of background organic compounds present in the pond bottom derived from naturally occurring ' compounds and regional drainage Into the pond watershed. A total of 27.6 mg/kg PAI-Is were tentatively quantified from analysis of SD-001, 26.9 mg/kg from SD-002, and 21.7 mg/kg from SD-003. No TCDFs, TCDDs, PeCDFs, or PeCDDs were detected from analysis of sample SD-001 (cable 6-4). Concentrations of 1.2 ug/kg HxCDFs, 1.5 ug/kg HxCDDs, 5.0 ug/kg HpCDFs, 18 ug/kg HpCDDs, 8.5 ug/kg OCDF and 120 ug/kg OCDD were detected in the SD-001 sample. The same isomers were detected in the duplicate analysis, but concentrations were significantly lower ' (fable 6-4). bp109123.06 6-6 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' SECTION 6 ' 6.4 RESULTS OF SURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLING Analysis of the surficial soil samples did not detect mercury, selenium, zinc, copper, silver, or thallium above POLs (Table 6-5 ). Chromium was detected at concentrations ranging from 1500 mg/kg to 13000 mg/kg. Hexavalent chromium was detected at a concentration of 1.3 mg/kg in SS-001 but not in any of the other soil samples tested. Lead was detected at concentrations ranging from 170 mg/kg to 660 mg/kg. Concentrations of chromium from SS-001, SS-002, SS-003, and SS-004; lead from SS-001 and SS-002; and cadmium from SS-002 exceed published natural occurring background concentrations (cable 6-5; Lindsay, 1979) for metals. All other concentrations were within background levels. Other metals were detected as indicated in Table 6-5. PCBs were not detected in the surficial soil samples. The concentration of total chromium was observed to decrease significantly with depth from the surface in the area of discolored soils. Surficial sample SS-03 (12,000 mg/kg) was collected directly adjacent to the location of boring ABB-5 where results of soil analysis for total chromium detected 1700 mg/kg at a depth of 4.5 to 6.5 feet below ground surface (Table 6-1). 6.5 DISCUSSION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES ' The laboratory reports in Appendix D contain the results of laboratory quality assurance analyses. Laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality Control was conducted in accordance with the MADEP Policy #WSC-000-69, Minimum Standards for Analytical Data for Remedial Response Actions Under MGL c. 2/E. Procedures included the analysis of method blanks, matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates. Analytical duplicates and surrogate spikes. ABB-ES review of the laboratory reporting of these analyses indicates that analyses meet the data quality objectives identified by the methods used and as specified in the POP. Field quality control samples, including trip blanks, field blanks, rinsate blanks, and blind duplicates, were collected and submitted to the respective laboratories as prescribed by the POP. A total of thirty- five quality control analyses were performed including all media and organic and inorganic analytes. ' bp109123.06 6-7 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1 SECTION 6 6.5.1 Subsurficial Soil and Groundwater , VOCs were not detected in the trip blanks. VOCs and hexavalent chromium were not detected in any field or rinsate blanks. Duplicate analyses for VOCs in soil and groundwater indicated results within prescribed relative percent difference (RPD;30 percent). Results of duplicate analyses for hexavalent chromium in groundwater were identical. Blind duplicate analyses for hexavalent chromium and total chromium were within RPD limits (2 percent difference). The blind duplicate samples analyzed for VOCs in groundwater were analyzed at two different dilutions. All compounds that were found in the duplicate (low level analysis) at ' concentrations above the detection limit of the original sample were detected in the original sample (higher level analysis) with the exception of 1,1-DCA. The RPD values for the compounds detected in the blind duplicates were below 30 percent for all compounds detected except 1,1,1-TCA which was 40 percent. The results of the analysis show reasonable compatibility. 6.5.2 Sediments, Surface Water, and Surficial Soils The results of field and rinsate blank analyses did not detect hexavalent chromium or organics (PCBs, PAHs, or PCDFs/PCDDs). , Duplicate analysis for PCDFs/PCDDs in sediment detected the same compounds at different concentrations (high RPDs). The results indicate that the isomers detected are present in the samples and differences in concentrations detected are likely a result of sample heterogeneity. Duplicate analysis of hexavalent chromium in sediment and surficial soil were within acceptable BPDs. Duplicate analyses of hexavalent chromium in surface water suggest uncertainty in the results. One analysis did not detect hexavalent chromium and the duplicate analysis indicated the presence of hexavalent chromium. Duplicate analyses for total metals in surface water, soil, and sediments were not reported by the laboratory. , bp109123.06 6-8 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 6 The results of the field and rinsate blanks indicated the presence of low concentrations of several metals (copper, zinc, lead, silver, antimony, and thallium), many of which are common in water supply systems. Some of the results of the environmental samples were accordingly qualified (particularly copper and zinc) by inclusion of,J designation signifying detected below practical quantitation level. The data presented in Tables 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4 has been appropriately blank corrected to include the J designations. i 1 bp109123.06 6-9 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. TABLE6-1 SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS PHASE LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION HAMBLETB HAYES,SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS MAY,1991 (rn9lk9) BORINGN ABB-1 ABB-1 ABB-2 ABB-2 ABB-3 ABB-3 ABB-4 ABB-5 ABB-5 ABB-5 ABBE ABB-7 SAMPLEN S-6 JS-8 S-2 S-5 i'IS-1 IS-2: S-6 S-25I S-2DUP S-3 9. S-4 S-4 ANALYTICAL AEflit! 8.5-30f5 1d.5-.t8,5 2.5-4.5; 85-10,5 0.5-25 2.6-45 S.S'-10.6 2.5-4.iS 2.54.5> A.5-6S 8.5-8b -B.S-B.s METHOD{3) VINYL CHLORIDE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO ND NA NA NO EPA 8240 METHYLENE CHLORIDE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 ACETONE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE NO NO ND NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE NO NO ND NO NA 3.5 NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 CHLOROFORM NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA ND EPA 8240 2-BUTANONE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE NO NO 19 630 NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 VINYLACETATE NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO NO NA NA ND EPA 8240 TRICHLOROETHENE NO NO 83 290 NA NO NO NO NO NA NA ND EPA 8240 TETRACHLOROETHENE NO 0.0211 720 970 NA 9.4 NO NO 0.0111 NA NA NO EPA 8240 TOLUENE NO NO NO 120 NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 ETHYLSENZENE NO NO NO 140 NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 XYLENES NO NO 180 1800 NA NO NO NO NO NA NA NO EPA 8240 CHROMIUM NA NA NA NA 810 NA NA NA NA 1700 11 NA EPA 5010 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM NA NA NA NA NO NA NA NA NA NO NO NA EPA 3128 MOD TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS NA 450 NA NA NA NA 900 NA NA NA NA NA EPA 418.1 NOTES: NO DENOTES NOT DETECTED NA DENOTES NOT ANALYZED J DENOTES BELOW PRACTICAL OUANTITATION LEVEL (1)REFER TO APPENDIX D FOR SAMPLE SPECIFIC QUANTITATION LIMITS TABLE 6-2 - GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION HAMBLET$HAYES,SALEM MASSACHUSETTS MAY,1991 .( gA) - Sampla Location DET.LIMIT' ABB-1 ABB-2 ABB-3 ABB-4 ABB-5 ABB-5 DUP ABB-G ABB-7 HLA-1 HLA-2 HLA-3 HLA-3 DUP HLA-4 HLA-5 HLA-6 MMCL ANAL.METHOD VINYLCHLORIDE 10 ND NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO 14 2 EPA 8240 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 6 NO 8100 32 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO 4J NO 2 EPA 8240 ACETONE 100 260 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO — EPA 8240 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 5 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO — EPA 8240 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 5 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA 74 NO 9 7 EPA 8240 trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 5 4J 18001 58 NO 40 35J NO NO NO NO NO NA 14 12 66 100 EPA 8240 CHLOROFORM 5 2J NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA 39 NO NO — EPA 8240 2-BUTANONE 100 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA 210J NO NO — EPA 8240 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 5 16 82000 93 NO 420 400 NO NO NO 17 NO NA NO NO NO 200 EPA 8240 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 NO NO 111 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO 5 EPA 8240 VINYL ACETATE 50 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO 120 — EPA 8240 TRICHLOROETHENE 5 10 26000 70 NO 680 880 NO NO NO 10 11 NA 37 15 NO 5 EPA 8240 TETRACHLOROETHENE 5 5 17000 70 NO 67 58 NO NO 5 5 53 NA 100 2J 7 5 EPA 8240 TOLUENE 5 NO 11000 20J 6900 18J 161 NO NO NO 2J NO NA NO NO NO 1000 EPA 8240 ETHYLBENZENE 5 NO 3700 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO 700 EPA 8240 XYLENES 5 NO 25000 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO NO NO 1000 EPA 8240 DILUTION FACTOR — 1x 500x 5x 100x lox lox 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 2.5x tx 1x 1x — CHROMIUM 20 NA NA 2Ev06 8J 66 NA 14J 17J NA ""' 5100 5100 NA 6.81 8.91 100 EPA 6010 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 10 NA NA NA NO NO NA NO NO NA NA 5500 5400 NA NO NO 50 EPA 312: NOTES:NO DENOTES NOT DETECTED NA DENOTES NOT ANALYZED METHOD DETECTION LIMIT,ASSUMES NO DILUTION;SAMPLE SPECIFIC DETECTION LIMITS ARE BASED ON THE PRODUCT OF THE METHOD DETECTION LIMIT AND EACH SAMPLES DILUTION FACTOR J DENOTES BELOW PRACTICAL QUANTITATION LEVEL MMCL DENOTES MASSACHUSETTS MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL ugA DENOTES MICROGRAMS PER LITER VALUES REPORTED HAVE DILUTION FACTOR INCORPORATED GROUNDWATER FROM ABB-3 AND HLA-3 WASCOLLECTED FOR CHROMIUM ANALYSIS ON AUGUST 1,1991 TABLE 6-3 SURFACE WATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION HAMBLET&HAYES,SALEM MASSACHUSETTS SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER, 1991 (ug/0 DETECTION 1 , ANALYTICAL. - 1 SAMPLE# SW-001 SW=001 DUP SW 002: (. SW43: LIMITS METHODS BERYLLIUM ND NA NO NO 0.78 EPA 200.7/6010 CADMIUM ND NA NO NO 4.7 EPA 200.7/6010 1 CHROMIUM 40 NA 87 NO 20 EPA 200.7/6010 COPPER 1.0.1 NA 9.0 1.01 7.1 EPA 200.7/6010 NICKEL ND NA NO ND 6.8 EPA 200.7/6010 ZINC 37 NA 26 29 6.6 EPA 200.7/6010 ANTIMONY 0.35J NA 1.81 0.75.1 2.6 EPA 7000 SERIES ARSENIC 0.45J NA 0.901 NO 2.4 EPA 7000 SERIES LEAD 42 NA 66 13 3.2 EPA 7000 SERIES ' SELENIUM 0.70J NA ND ND 2.9 EPA 7000 SERIES SILVER 0.10.1 NA 0.101 0.10.1 0.16 EPA 7000 SERIES THALLIUM ND NA 0.25J 0.20J 1.5 EPA 7000 SERIES MERCURY ND NA ND ND 0.40 EPA 245.1 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 65 NO ND ND 50 EPA 7195 MOD CHLORIDE(mg/1) 100 NA 98 79 3.0 EPA 300.0 NOTES: NA Denotes Not Analyzed , ND Denotes Not Detected J Denotes Below Practical Quantitation Level ug/I Denotes Micrograms Per Liter mg/I Denotes Milligrams Per Liter i i 1 1 TABLE 6-4 SEDIMENT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION HAMBLET&HAYES, SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER, 1991 METAL.S(mg/kgX1} SAMPLE# SD:-001 D;-001DU iSD-002 S13403 ANALYTICALmETHOD BERYLLIUM 4.3 NA 4.3 2.5 EPA 200.7/6010 CADMIUM 5.3 NA 4.8 4.7 EPA 200.7/6010 CHROMIUM 7100 NA 5300 1000 EPA 200.7/6010 ' COPPER 140J NA 130.1 97J EPA 200.7/6010 NICKEL - 44 NA 41 28 EPA 200.7/6010 ZINC 740J NA 580J 590J EPA 200.7/6010 ANTIMONY 0.19.1 NA 0.34J 0.22J EPA 7000 SERIES ARSENIC 9.4 NA 17 11 EPA 7000 SERIES LEAD 700 NA 660 470 EPA 7000 SERIES SELENIUM 2.4J NA 3.1 0.42J EPA 7000 SERIES SILVER - 2.5 NA 2.6 1.4 EPA 7000 SERIES THALLIUM 1.0.1 NA 0.25J 0.81J EPA 7000 SERIES MERCURY ND NA NO ND EPA 245.1 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 3.1 3.1 2.1 1.8 EPA 7195 MOD PAHS(Ug/kgX1} PHENANTHRENE 2600.1 NA 2500J 2200J EPA 8270 FLUORANTHENE 6400J NA 5400J 4300J EPA 8270 PYRENE 5800J NA 5000J 4100J EPA 8270 CHRYSENE 3100J NA 2700J 2400J EPA 8270 ' BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE 3300J NA 4200J 2700J EPA 8270 BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE 2800) NA 1800.1 1900J EPA 8270 BENZO(a)PYRENE 2800J NA 2500J 2000J EPA 8270 INDENO(1,2,3-cd)PYRENE 800J NA 1500J 1000.1 EPA 8270 BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE NO NA 1300J 920J EPA 8270 DIOXINSIFURANS(ug ftX2) TCDFs NO NO NA NA PeCDFs NO NO NA NA HxCDFs 1.2 0.33 NA NA HpCDFs 5.0 0.85 NA NA OCDF 8.5 0.89 NA NA TCDDS NO ND NA NA PeCDDs NO NO NA NA HxCDDs 1.5 0.40 NA NA HpCDDs 18 2.4 NA NA OCDD 120 12 NA NA NOTES: NO=Not detected ' NA Not analyzed J=Analyte present but below practical quantitation limit (1)- Refer to Appendix D for sample and analyte specific detection limits ' (2)= Dioxins/Furans analyses performed by low resolution mass spectrometry; refer to Appendix D for analysis specific detection limits mg/kg=Milligrams Per Kilogram ' ug/kg=Micrograms Per Kilogram TABLE 6-5 SURFICIAL SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION ' HAMBLET&HAYES,SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER,1991 (mgtkg) ' ANALYTICAL SAMPLEM •SS-001 SS-002 SS=002D SS )03 SS-004 METHODS(1) BACKGROUND LIMITS(2). ' BERYLLIUM 2.4 2.5 NA 1.9 1.5 EPA 200.716010 40 CADMIUM 0.421 2.2 NA 0.47J 0.092J EPA 200.7/6010 0.7 CHROMIUM 1500 13000 NA 12000 8200 EPA 200.716010 1000 COPPER 311 34J NA 24J 21J EPA 200.716010 100 ' NICKEL 41 38 NA 24 35 EPA 200.716010 500 ZINC 140J 260J NA 1001 63J EPA 200.718010 300 ANTIMONY 1.91 2.61 NA 2J 0.083J EPA 7000 SERIES 200 ARSENIC 3.3 NO NA 5.8 3.2 EPA 7000 SERIES 50 ' LEAD 660 580 NA 170 230 EPA 7000 SERIES 200 SELENIUM NO NO NA NO NO EPA 7000 SERIES 2 SILVER 1.11 .0861 NA 0.191 .023J EPA 7000 SERIES 5 THALLIUM 280J 700J NA 230J NO EPA 7000 SERIES — MERCURY NO NO NA NO NO EPA 245.1 0.3 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 1.3 ND NO NO NO EPA7195MOD — PCBs NO NO NA NO NO EPA 8080 — NOTES: ND-not detected ' J-analyte present but below practical quantitation limit. (1)Detection limits are compound specific;refer to Appendix D for individual compound detection limits (2)Lindsey,1979 , mg/kg denotes milligrams per kilogram r r ttrl r I� r �r r ttr r �■ r ttr r ■� r ttttil r Ir NOIEC nvux BExvm RNOZLxIr1eT1 xlYEew. © xu MOM RCp08 BN1iLIlO Laurx%9IRER o a a BN% 2 quL wcln°xelx°azW Ware a:are vMReMe lxe wsuxov°Em IRE BCILe REST IWROnW1F Ol LY lF� fIwM1011M RF➢RF8O1}001�11TM1gN81N IBB VIWPo9EUY>IRONXO RLL 00M uavlKtnVQ°LETVRIm nw oo uxvRareeXewlEIL¢evLelRSLe py BlMuxw%TBNsruLB .-% TA M11W ROBXOIRLL R.VLRdO G EYIBIIIp MUl008E MIlICN WELL rw° Mllll COiOVIt � / MILLPOND Laxox� \ 1225 .,5,, /„•� ��e.\ N � D �' s ABB-3 aRo I V.VEMEM 174' W ... Y. ................... ............. .., Ail......... ........... .. Hiii i i fiiiiiiiuiiiiiiii iHfHiiii iii ii iiiii iii` �i' ` 1 o x.H. ..._ 20G •/4\\\�_ . .(210 MEK) A RR .LL BLw E IBvWELL LLI 54 AW LLS �75 U Y I VRJVO _ nrER / _ ( /I(TOLUENE) __ WBLr . 911LONCM O BLWN \Iuw 33(j WH xND FIGURE 6-1 ���� ABB Environmental TOTAL VOC CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER MIND Services Inc. PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION ASEA BROWN BOVERI HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS NORB: © .IV4M LEINFDFWJYXW9ETe WYE0L0 x FBVLm RmRxE BYpIW LxenmeeFrFN = xu L,YR YBLLLoamRWOBRRxelaeaFenE eau r6ET RINPEH YIDYWUIO NN1011E IIFROXIW1EdILV. {F.fFyQ O CdtOIM R➢REBEXi Cp1GEMMlICM p.[/( 1 IY FW OLWINOWOWELL 4FZ BBB VRMOEORFSCBETFRLS1n01 O/O WFMq>EY OIFICENLBOPIE 00o O WRILF WITERIfY(E ' MLLPaO O WmXO MM O®EMBTMM WELL CMVERTTO &WTHIM PWERNER MILLPOND % 67 BB D ABB-61 seo� R SYS ND �� AB13-3 ��� �X..�� ►: .. _. ......... ................ .. 2.17,Upp......... . . \ xm.0 rr*Frrr rrrrrrlrrr r rrrnU \ XuwELLx MILPa0w01 LL ........ .... ............................. .... '60__ : ND PE.P 4 ELCO.E BLMiL :Wt EXU WELLF ................ nnM6O �0 .....� ':) :.i 534 . .. ¢ 5 o LLi45 ND B- 2 AB ,� LG1LpElEPBD % t 'ABB-4 L uvTa� i + WELL nnxc0 — j—%— ..•% •••• `••% !^'�.w`"� BVIWNGN BIGG.K ABB-7 •.% 4 E T FIGURE 6-2 ABB Environmental PCE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER ♦��/�/ Services Inc. PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION AREA BROWN BOVERI HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS w Ilw w w liw w Illw w Ilw Illw Illw �■ Illw Iw w Illw w Iiw w xDha ,Lp1Y DFAlYEDFILCYX110lET•N1YE9 CO. © F1O111'F RECIM®.Ba1i1110 Lw'1TIOXB 4lER • M M xu Dr i= T 1) M.N,Exadaw NTE fF�NRF]/.NO BYPIIp NM1,811E [FT IVxPOYWR dLY. :vncun fIFGx,W M RFIEBEM Wx�xTMIIpIBN oe/r WxRdwEDIgIrtORRO WELL ��uavaaoecDFczD,ETNL LDunw •••••••,,_ oe AwaamdEa,sxd mLaNNu ._X }A xu NdrtaaxD wELL X Y auLRaG O ExNOxE xex o08EWATIDx weu l`_ vAnG I cuaEN To - soGrxarveR X._ CwNDU �._ MILLPOND ' ,'+ ' MN AB5,^ M1ZPAVEMENT g AB" % I `ele` \ ` ' 9S' .LOG.x .............................................` ... ........ ..........$%iTi AB&3 LNPCF LEM I �AB&2 82,000 \x\ PAVEMENT BLIX.G ..�_ ....:.... ................. .J'h ........... .. ...... rrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. rrrr rr 7.� xur tT r : L. xu wEuz vwiwDxxsiw+c ...._..... _.... .:.Gnr...._dn-' -. .._: exx 'w.x$ua 81m.E NW.L IE n b: ................................................................i.�.................... ....... 0.. ... �:...J .. nu weLu -.....-...—� f..................... :::...:.... x.x 1 # s: uwE a SND ..-..... + 1B i i x ABB-,- ND ND ND ��_�� . DSCNETE FAG `ABB-4 - wxTeP y WELLv jty ELL O 0 .- x..... ...-X ........... .x D-A ABB-7f ANN y dre ..x x �X FIGURE 6-3 ABB Environmental 1,1-DCA & 1,1,1-TCA CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER ♦����� Services Inc. PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION AREA B90WN BOVERI HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS IJP B © IIxWIDEYL'm iRLW 1YYBIETB WYFI M. � XMYR IECOIOfl BYVIW LdJ1M11BMlER = un.Rl »BLL IOC1PwBY1p LwBITyp6W1E YJIE iFET PLNIEB YIOBBIfINO xOMR Y6 MVTmWIEwLY. IEYFtlQ »ewlaxRBResRUBYrewux*Wnwaix zgxt urvRwceEDYwxoRxxwELL .IwMIWYtl RIF4IRYMELYIIFMwROIYIYm NIBi CbVI BYxROVEDxF201E1ER 10LBPw I ^""'��-� O��yx 'MILL ibNO 66 AB&5 :+ABB6 14J J. ABB-3 1,700,000 tt LMU Cf BLDG J %" VBVEMEM BLCG O �. ��ff ' eLDD.D 1 1-Fi-FHi+H-FIIN-FI1H1/1F41AHIiFFIh41111 nuµwEu� 9B 2 Xu weuz .......................Rrawo.DsiDMc .............................................. ' ............ ... 230�. ._..._....."'"" _._. .......nxenx SJ BLIXI.E BLDD.LG.,E SWELL. X.N60 p< LJ MELL.:................1 LL wELL, b............o nu weu Xx % 8J 5,400 (4) 6.8J ABB-,' mN RmE wO ABBd MTEB 1 BUWLY WELL N1N50 j jj BLDG.♦ ABB-7 MM FIGURE 6-4 ABB Environmental TOTAL CHROMIUM CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER ♦11111 Services Inc. PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION AREA BROWN BOVERI HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Z 0 h SECTION 7 7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS The following is a discussion integrating the results of the Phase I field investigation and background information collected at the Site. Refer to Figure 4-1 for locations of site features and investigation points discussed. ' 7.1 POTENTIAL SOURCE AREAS ' Several areas have been identified where apparent releases of oil or hazardous materials were detected during field investigations conducted at the Site. Figures presented in Section 6.0 estimate the distribution of compounds detected in groundwater beneath the Site. Analysis of the analytical data in conjunction with the Site use and history information obtained during the assessment allows ABB-ES to preliminarily identify potential source areas for the contamination detected. ' The presence of elevated concentrations of VOCs in shallow and deep soils, as well as in groundwater ' at ABB-2 in the area of former solvent underground storage tanks adjacent to the railroad spur, suggests that historical releases of VOCs likely occurred in this area. Because the area is currently paved, it is presently believed that both volatilization to air and precipitation infiltration and subsequent vertical downward transport of VOCs are limited. 1 The VOC concentrations detected in shallow soils at ABB-3 in the area between Buildings H and I suggest that minor surficiial releases of these compounds have occurred in that area. Review of soil and ' groundwater quality data from ABB-3 suggests that VOCs may have been released from surficial soil to groundwater in that area, as well as having migrated from the area of ABB-2. The presence of VOCs in ' groundwater in ABB-5 to the north of Building I, but not in soils, suggests that the compounds could have migrated in groundwater from other areas (e.g., ABB-2, ABB-3) to the ABB-5 location. bp109123.07 7-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 7 ' The presence of VOCs in groundwater at low (ppb) concentrations in several of the wells is likely a result ' of the historical use of the property and small surface spills that may have occurred during solvent handling, particularly in the early history of the Site when much of the area was not paved and when less was known about product handling than is known today. The data from wells ABB-1, HLA-1, and HLA-5 do not suggest that a significant release of VOCs has occurred in the area of the active underground ' storage tank farm. The presence of the discoloration observed and TPH detected in soils from beneath the water table at , ABB-1, in the area of the active underground storage tank farm, suggests that a historical release of petroleum-related materials may have occurred during prior Site usage (possibly when the Site was a fuel terminal). Petroleum-related VOCs were not detected in groundwater from ABB-1, suggesting that the TPH detected is either heavy fuel or an old release (or both). The clean fill above the water table at ' ABB-1 was put in place during construction of the active underground storage tank farm in 1981. The presence of green colored and low pH groundwater in the area of HLA-2 and ABB-3, and the ' corresponding elevated concentration of chromium, suggests a release of chromium to groundwater in ' the area. The HLA 1989 report indicates that well HLA-2 was installed in the area of discharge of non- contact cooling water. Plant engineering representatives indicated to ABB-ES that groundwater discharges have ceased in that area and that all process water, cooling waters, and floor drains have been routed into the internal wastewater recycling and disposal system. The presence of the green groundwater and the piezometric mound beneath that part of the Site suggests some type of water discharge may have occurred in the past and/or may be currently occurring. The green color in the groundwater may, in fact, be caused by chromium known to be present in soils in the area, which have become solubilized under low pH conditions. The presence of elevated concentrations of chromium in surficial soils behind Buildings I and J and from the near surficial interval at ABB-3 suggests that historical releases of chromium to the ground surface have occurred. Site information suggests that spills of chromium have likely contributed to the ' presence of chromium in surficial soils. The use of the spray drying process to manufacture basic chromium powder and the resulting permitted air emissions from the spray drying stack have likely ' bp109123.07 7-2 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 7 contributed to the presence of surficial soil contamination in the area directly adjacent to the spray drying operation (Building 1). The highest concentration detected in soils was at the location with the most surface discoloration, closest to the building (SS-002). The concentrations of chromium in the soils decreased radially outward from this location, corresponding to an observed decrease in soil 1 discoloration. ' The detection of low concentrations of OCDDs and Isolated detection of OCDFs, HPCDDs and HPCDFs, and HXCDFs in the area of the former garage, north of the manufacturing building as reported by HLA in 1989 (HLA, 1989) and summarized by ABB-ES in the 1991 Preliminary Environmental Assessment ' Report, suggests that a release may have occurred in this area. However, the samples collected were composited from intervals with fill materials. The long industrial history and presence of ash in fill ' materials observed at the Site may suggest that the PCDD/PCDF compounds may not be a result of a specific source area release. Because the area is currently paved, direct contact and migration potential ' are presently being eliminated. The low solubility of these compounds in water indicates that media transfer is unlikely. ' The detection of TPH in saturated soils and toluene in groundwater at ABB-4, adjacent to the area of Building A, suggests that a release of petroleum products has occurred. The former underground storage tanks in the area of Building A reportedly contained petroleum products and likely are the source of the observed contamination. The unsaturated soils at ABB-4 did not exhibit contamination via ' the field screening, suggesting that the historical source of the release is upgradient toward Building A and that the contamination has migrated in the direction of inferred groundwater flow. ' 7.2 POTENTIAL MIGRATION PATHWAYS ' Contours of available groundwater quality data for total VOCs, PCE, 1,1,1-TCA and 1,1-DCA, and total chromium are presented on Figures 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4. These figures illustrate the currently understood lateral distribution of these compounds and, combined with the piezometric surface map (Figure 5-5), provide insight to the migration routes of these chemicals. bp109123.07 7-3 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1 SECTION 7 The observed groundwater mound has likely led to a minor degree of VOC migration through advection , from the areas of higher concentration (ABB-2, ABB-3). The presence of low (ppb) concentrations of VOCs and total chromium in several wells at the Site suggests that contaminant transport via lateral dispersion has also likely occurred. The limited piezometric surface data and the results of groundwater sampling and analysis at the Site and at the adjacent Exeter property suggests that groundwater is ' flowing from the Exeter property toward the apparent groundwater trough east of Buildings A and B at the western margin of the Site, or is flowing around the Site. , The water table beneath the majority of the Site is relatively flat, which suggests that migration of contaminants dissolved in groundwater occurs slowly beneath the majority of the Site. The limited ' distribution of elevated contaminant concentrations in groundwater (i.e., VOCs at ABB-2; chromium at HLA-3, HLA-2 and ABB-3) reinforces this observation. ' Combining groundwater flow interpretations with the changes in stratigraphy observed from the soil borings, as Interpreted from the cross sections discussed in Section 5.0, suggests that groundwater may migrate from areas of higher conductivity (glacio-fluvial deposits) into areas of lower conductivity and ' higher organic carbon content (estuarine deposits). These subsurface conditions likely retard transport of the organic compounds dissolved in water. Groundwater appears to flow toward Mill Pond at the northern and northwestern margin of the Site. Available measurements collected from piezometers installed within Mill Pond suggest an upward, or ' discharging, component of groundwater flow beneath Mill Pond. These observations suggest that contaminants in groundwater at the northern and northwestern margins of the Site likely discharge to ' Mill Pond. The low concentrations of chromium detected in surface water in Mill Pond suggest that the chromium ' In groundwater beneath the pond and in pond sediments is stable and does not appear to be readily migrating or dissolving into the surface water. i bp109123.07 7-4 0644004 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , ' SECTION 7 ' Most of the Site is paved or covered by buildings, limiting the potential for volatilization or dust particle transport of contaminants released to soil or groundwater at the Site. The capping effect of Site pavement and buildings also limits the potential for precipitation infiltration and transport of contaminants by flushing or washing action. The fact that the majority of the Site is paved Indicates that transport via storm runoff of contaminated soils and potentially dissolved compounds to the adjacent surface water environment is restricted. However, the presence of chromium in a limited area of surticial soils adjacent to Buildings I and J likely leads to limited surticial runoff of chromium contaminated soils to Mill Pond during significant tprecipitation events. ' 7.3 PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL RECEPTOR ANALYSIS AND EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ' Because of the proximity of the Site to the Mill Pond environment, ABB-ES performed a preliminary ecological receptor evaluation. The purpose of this analysis was to initially identify potential ecological ' receptors of chemicals at or near the vicinity of the Site. Because the area surrounding the Site is zoned for industrial use, the significant ecological habitat potentially affected by site-related contamination is the tidally-influenced Mill Pond. The Mill Pond discharges directly into Salem Harbor through an 1 underground conduit. In addition, limited upland habitat is located directly northeast of the main manufacturing building. ' Common reed (Phragmites australis) forms an extensive fringing border around Mill Pond in the vicinity of the Site. This species effectively excludes other plant species, with the exception of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), from much of the wetlands and 100-year floodplain associated with Mill Pond. In the relatively drier areas above the pond, thickets of staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) are found associated with scattered choke cherry (Prunus virginiana), apple (Pyrus sp.), and hawthorn (Crataegus sp.). Weedy species (including various members of the Compositae) and Japanese knotweed (Polygonum ' cuspidatum) occur in the fill areas surrounding the parking lot. bpl09123.07 7-5 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 7 r Bind species observed on the Site include various songbirds and gulls, northern mockingbird (Mimus , polyglottus), belted kingfisher (Megaceryle alcyon), and greater yellowlegs (Tringa melanoleuca). Field workers have also reported seeing ducks, probably mallards (Anal platyrhynchos), and geese (Brants canadensis) in Mill Pond. Signs of wildlife have also been observed during Site visits. Several narrow animal trails and burrow , holes were observed, indicating that rodents occur in the wetland areas associated with Mill Pond. Bank ' holes, underwater°canals" and pieces of cattail (Typha latifolia) stems indicate that muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) occur at the Site. In addition, scat signs and footprints attest to the presence of raccoon (Procyon lotor). Although a benthic macroinvertebrate survey was not conducted, the invertebrate fauna in the tidal muds , associated with MITI Pond is sufficient to attract wading birds. Approximately fifteen greater yellowlegs were observed foraging, and a belted kingfisher was observed eating a frog in October 1991. In ' addition, several minnows and aquatic beetles were also observed in Mill Pond during an earlier site visit in March 1991. i According to the National Heritage and Endangered Species Program 1990 Atlas of Estimated Habitats of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife, there are no State-listed rare wetland species within one-half mile ' of the Site. Terrestrial organisms, such as birds, rodents, and raccoons, may potentially be exposed to surface soil constituents via the incidental Ingestion pathway during foraging or preening activities. However, the areal extent of documented surficial soil contamination at the Site is so limited that it is unlikely that animals would spend an appreciable amount of time in the contaminated area or be significantly ' exposed through this pathway. The small area of unpaved contaminated surface soil is primarily bare ground and is an unsuitable foraging habitat. Consequently, this exposure pathway is not considered significant enough for further ecological evaluation at this time. bpl09123.07 7-6 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' SECTION 7 Organisms may be exposed to chemicals in sediment and/or surface water via several pathways, including: incidental Ingestion and/or direct contact with sediment by foraging wildlife and bottom dwelling macrobenthic species, ingestion of water by terrestrial animals, and direct contact with water by aquatic species. It is also possible that predator species may be exposed through the consumption of ' contaminated prey. Information presently available to evaluate the toxicity of site-related chemicals to free-swimming aquatic organisms consist of Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC). Toxicological data sufficient to develop criteria are not presently available for all surface water constituents. For chemicals with insufficient ' toxicological data, EPA suggests using the Lowest Observed Effect Level (LOEL). AWQC for the constituents detected in surface water samples are presented in Table 7-1. Although Mill Pond is tidally Influenced, salinity and conductivity measurements obtained from the pond during both low and high tide indicate that the habitat is primarily freshwater. In addition, the results of available chloride ' measurements discussed in Section 6.0 also suggest that the pond is not marine water. Consequently, the freshwater criteria are presented in Table 7-1. Surface water samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of the 13 priority pollutant metals. Several of the metals were not detected. Two of the metals tested, hexavalent chromium and lead, exhibited results which exceeded AWQC. The results of hexavalent chromium analyses do not appear to be reliable, and the existing data is inconclusive. One sample detected the presence of hexavalent chromium (at 65 ug/1), even though a ' duplicate sample collected at the same time from the same location did not indicate the presence of hexavalent chromium. Samples from two other locations did not indicate the presence of hexavalent ' chromium in surface water. If the hexavalent chromium is actually present (and the existing data is inconclusive) it may not be widespread throughout the Mill Pond surface water body. In addition, the hexavalent chromium data for groundwater samples does not appear to be consistent with the total chromium results for groundwater samples. N bp109123.07 7-7 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 7 The results of available lead analyses indicate that Mill Pond water quality exceeds chronic AWOC values ' only. Moreover, lead is not a compound associated with the use of the Site or with any of the known releases. The area of the She and Mill Pond is urban in nature and has been industrialized for at least 100 years. Elevated concentrations of lead in soils and sediments are not uncommon in urban areas. The Mill Pond area receives surface and stormwater runoff from a large, historically commercial/industrial/residential watershed of Salem. No known release from the Site to surface water , has resulted in, or could result in, concentrations of lead that might exceed AWOC. Threshold toxicity data for evaluating macroinvertebrate exposure to sediment such as Sediment Quality Criteria (SOC) and USEPA "non-polluted threshold values" are available for several of the compounds , detected in sediment, and were derived using AWOC (Table 7-2). Information is lacking for many of the sediment constituents, although USEPA is in the process of developing SOC for several groups of compounds, including inorganics. The concentrations of lead and PAI-Is detected in available sediment samples exceed the existing SOC values. Copper and nickel concentrations detected are close to the SOC values but are not considered ' indicative of a release. The presence of lead and PAI-Is may not be related to the detected releases at the Site, but to current and historical land uses (i.e., rail yard, automotive, commercial/industrial) in the regional urban area that makes up the watershed of Mill Pond. The detection of low concentrations of , OCDD/OCDF and other isolated PCDDs and PCDFs in sediment samples may be related to the Site conditions or may be a result of fossil fuel combustion associated with the rail yard history of the Site and surrounding properties. bp109123.07 7-8 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. TABLE 7-1 COMPARISON OF MILL POND SURFACE WATER CONCENTRATIONS WITH AVAILABLE STANDARDS HAMBLET AND HAYES SITE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS CONCENTRATION[a] AWQC(Freshwater) CHEMICAL Average(1) Maximum Chronic Acute (u ) (u9f4 (u9g) Beryllium ND ND Cadmium ND ND Chromium 46 87 210 [b,c] 1700 [b,c] Copper 3.7 9 12 [c] 18 [c] Nickel ND ND Zinc 31 37 110 [c] 120 [c] Antimony 1.0 1.8 1600 [d] 9000 [d] Arsenic 0.9 1.2 [g] 48 [d,e] 850 [d,e] Lead 40 66 3.2 [c] 82 [c] Selenium 1.2 1.45 [g] 35 260 Silver 0.1 0.1 0.12 [c] 4.1 [c] Thallium 0.4 0.75 [g] 40 [d] 1400 [d] Mercury ND ND Hexavalent Chromium 11 65 11 [f] 16 [f] NOTES: (1) For analytical sample results listed as "ND", one half the limit of detection was used in calculating average concentrations. However, if the particular analyte was not detected in any sample it was presumed to be absent and no average was calculated. [a] Surface water data as presented in Table 6-3. [b] Criteria for trivalent chromium. [c] Hardness dependent criteria(100 mg/L assumed). [d] Insufficient data to develop criteria. Value presented is the LOEL(Lowest Observed Effect Level). [e] Criteria for pentavalent arsenic. [f] Criteria for hexavalent chromium. [g] One half the method detection limit. ug/I denotes microgram per liter AWQC denotes Ambient Water Quality Criteria ND denotes not detected TABLE 7-2 COMPARISON OF MILL POND SEDIMENT CONCENTRATIONS WITH AVAILABLE CRITERIA/STANDARDS HAMBLET AND HAYES SITE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS CONCENTRATION[a) Sac CHEMICAL, Average Maximum THRESHOLD VALUE m k I m k Beryllium 3.7 4.3 NA Cadmium 4.9 5.3 31 [b] Chromium 4467 7100 NA Copper 122 140 136 [b] Nickel 38 44 20 [b] Zinc 637 740 760 [b] Antimony 0.25 0.34 NA Arsenic 12 17 33 [b] Lead 610 700 132 [b] Selenium 2.0 3.1 NA Silver 2.2 2.6 NA Thallium 0.7 1 NA Mercury ND ND Hexavalent Chromium 2.3 3.1 NA Total PAI-Is [d] 25.3 27.6 13.9 [c] Total Dioxins/Furans[d] 0.086 0.154 NA NOTES: [a) Sediment data as presented in Table 6-4. In calculating averages, half the limit of detection was used for NDs. [b] "Non-polluted threshold value" (USEPA, 1987). [c] Sediment Quality Criterion (SQC) for phenanthrene, assuming 10% TOC. [d) Values were calculated by summing all similar class chemical concentration data per sample and summarizing among sampling locations. NA - None available; NO - Not detected. PAH - polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram 1 e ' 0 h ' 1 1 SECTION 8 8.0 FINDINGS The following is a summary of ABB-ES' findings based upon the results of collected background information and field investigation activities as summarized in this report and derived from previous studies and reports on the subject area and the geographic region in general. 8.1 GENERAL The Site has a 30 to 40 year history of the storage and usage of various organic and inorganic chemicals. One or more releases of organic and inorganic compounds has been detected at the Site. Site conditions as, determined by the LSI do not indicate that the releases present an imminent hazard to ' public health,,safety, welfare, or the environment requiring the performance of a short term measure. 8.2 GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY ' The Site is underlain by various types and thicknesses of fill materials, likely associated with expansion and grading during the evolution of Site usage. The fill materials are underlain by a complex series of ' fluvial and estuarine deposits associated with glacial and marine depositional processes in the former South River Basin. Based upon groundwater elevation measurements performed in September 1991 during the LSI, ABB-ES has observed that the water table is relatively flat beneath a majority of the Site and surrounding area. ' Groundwater is inferred to flow from the adjacent Exeter property toward the Site. An apparent mounding of groundwater has been observed in the area of Building I, resulting in an inferred localized ' radial groundwater flow from beneath this portion of the building. There is no presently available information to indicate when the mounding of groundwater was initiated or for how long the mounding has occurred. Groundwater beneath the Site is inferred to flow around or out of this mound toward Mill Pond at the northeastern, northern and northwestern margins of the Site. Limited water level measurements from piezometers suggest that groundwater discharges to Mill Pond at the northern margin of the Site. bp109123.08 8-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 8 8.3 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION ' Field investigations at the Site have identified preliminary potential source areas of contaminants ' released at the Site. These source areas appear to be small, laterally restricted areas of elevated concentrations of compounds. Releases of VOCs and chromium have been identified and the ' distribution of these compounds has been documented by soil and groundwater sampling and analysis. 8.3.1 Former South Underaround Storaae Tank Farm , A potential source of chlorinated VOCs is likely located between Buildings L and H. Elevated ' concentrations of VOCs were identified in both shallow soils and in groundwater in this location. Concentrations of several VOCs in groundwater exceed MMCLs. Concentrations of VOCs are ' substantially lower in all other wells tested. 8.3.2 Active Underground Storage Tank Farm Low concentrations (297 ug/I to 534 ug/1) of total VOCs (primarily ketones) were identified in the area of ' the active underground storage tank farm. Historical records, precision testing data for the underground storage tanks, and results of sampling and analysis of the H&H observation wells adjacent to the active ' tank farm (see ABB-ES, 1991) suggests that the active underground storage tank farm is not a source of significant release to soil or groundwater at the Site. However, the available H&H observation well data suggests that small surticial spills of VOCs have the potential to, and likely have, entered groundwater through these wells. The historical data reflects detection of minor VOC concentrations which decrease ' and disappear with subsequent sampling rounds. 8.3.3 Former North Underground Storage Tank Farm , An elevated concentration (6.9 mg/1) of toluene was identified in groundwater at ABB-4 in May 1991. ' The source of toluene was likely a former underground storage tank farm located in the area of Building A. Based on the available data, the toluene is not widely distributed across the Site. ' bp109123.08 8-2 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' SECTION 8 8.3.4 Spray Dryer Bulldina Area An elevated concentration of total chromium was detected in conjunction with green discoloration observed in groundwater at ABB-3 and HLA-2. Lower concentrations of total chromium were identified ' in groundwater at ABB-5 (66 ug/1). Hexavalent chromium was only identified at HLA-3 at a concentration of 5.5 mg/I. Hexavalent chromium was not detected in groundwater from any other location tested during the Phase I investigation. Chromium speciation was not performed on groundwater from ABB-0 or HLA-2. There is no presently available Information to indicate when the green discoloration occurred in the groundwater or if current activities are contributing to its presence. The extent of the green discoloration appears to be restricted to the area of ABB-3 and HLA-2 as it has not been observed in any other wells. ' Elevated concentrations of total chromium (1,500 mg/kg to 13,000 mg/kg) were identified in surficial ' soils collected from the discolored surficial area to the northeast of Buildings J and I in the area of ABB- 5. Analysis of soil collected from 4.5 to 6.5 feet below ground surface at ABB-5 also detected elevated ' concentrations of chromium (1,700 mg/kg). In addition, elevated concentrations of chromium (810 mg/kg) were detected in near-surficial soils (0.5 to 2.5 feet below ground surface) at ABB-3. Access to these areas is limited by pavement and site fencing. ABB-ES observations suggest that there currently ' appears to be no exposure by direct contact by facility personnel with these soils during site operations. The concentration of total chromium detected in groundwater from ABB-5 was significantly below ' MMCLs and suggests that the elevated concentration of chromium in soils in that area is not readily dissolving into groundwater. 8.3.5 Mill Pond ' An initial environmental assessment was performed for the Mill Pond environment including a preliminary receptor analysis and sampling and analysis of several surface water and sediment samples. Elevated concentrations of total chromium, lead, and PAI-Is were detected in sediment samples collected from Mill Pond. The presence of the lead in the Mill Pond environment is likely a result of urban runoff and can ' bp109123.08 8-3 06440-04 01/15/92 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION S ' not be related to any speck release incidents or materials used at the Site. The presence of PAHs are ' also likely a result of urban runoff and the long history of usage of the Site and surrounding properties as a railroad yard. Based upon the available data, concentrations of metals dissolved in surface water in Mill Pond are ' significantly lower than concentrations observed in sediment samples collected from similar locations. Concentrations of metals in Mill Pond surface water are below AWOC, with two exceptions. Hexavalent ' chromium was detected in one sample (not in the duplicate) at a concentration above AWOC. The results of the hexavalent chromium analyses for surface water appear to be inconclusive based upon several factors including differences in duplicate analyses and incompatibility between total chromium ' and hexavalent chromium results (hexavalent chromium greater than total chromium). This one data point does not appear representative of entire pond water quality, given that hexavalent chromium was , not detected in samples collected from the other two locations. Concentrations of lead detected in surface water samples exceed chronic AWOC only. Again, the lead detected is not likely a result of , releases from the Site but from the urban and industrial nature of the Pond watershed. 8.3.6 Other Locations , The leaching fields associated with the laboratory of Building B do not appear to have been a source of , contaminant release to soils or groundwater, based on results of testing at ABB-7 and HLA-5. The presence of PCDD and PCDF isomers in low concentrations in soils at the Site may be a result of a , release associated with former fungicide formulation at the northern margin of the site or may be linked ' to the widespread presence of ash in fill. The long history of railroad use of the Site and surrounding areas and associated fossil fuel combustion may also have contributed to the presence of PCDD and , PCDF Isomers in the Site area. bp109123.08 8-4 06440-04 , 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ' ! ! w 1 Z h i ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 SECTION 9 9.0 REFERENCES ABB Environmental Services, Inc., 1991. Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report, Hamblet & Hayes Facility, Colonial Road, Salem, Massachusetts, January 1991. Bewick Associates, 1990. "Environmental Site Assessment Report for 1 IGA Way", Salem, Massachusetts. Dragun, James, 1988. The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials. Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD. E.H. Porter Co., 1965. Plot Plan of Land in Salem, MA, Property of Hamblet and Hayes Co., redrawn from Original of May 26, 1961 by Osborn Planner Inc., Peabody, MA. E.H. Porter Co., 1970. Plot Plan of Land in Salem, MA, Property of Hamblet and Hayes Co., redrawn from Original of May 26, 1961 by Osborn Planner Inc., Peabody, MA. Harding Lawson Associates, 1989. "Preliminary Site Assessment of the Hamblet & Hayes Facilities: Salem, Massachusetts; Lewiston, Maine; and Gloversville, New York.° Parts 1 and 2. Harding Lawson Associates, 1990. "Draft Baseline Environmental Assessment Report, Hamblet & Hayes Facility,' Salem, Massachusetts. ' Lindsay, W.L, 1979. Chemical Equilibria In Soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, January 1990. "List of Confirmed Disposal Sites and Locations to be Investigated." Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), 1991. "Massachusetts Drinking Water Standards and Guidelines"; Office of Research and Standards; May 1990. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), 1988. "Massachusetts Contingency Piano; 310 CMR 40.00 at seq.; October 3, 1988. Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 1990. Division of Fisheries and Wildlife; October 2, 1990. National Heritage and Endangered Species Program, 1990. Atlas of Estimated Habitats of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife; Salem and Lynn, MA Quadrangle. Sammuel, E.A., Baker, J.A., and R.A. Bruckley, 1966. "Water Resources of the Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts." U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1826. ' bp109123.09 9-1 06440-04 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SECTION 9 Shacklett, H.T. and Boerngen, J.C., 1984. Element Concentrations in Soils and Other Surface Materials In Conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1270. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. Touiman, P., 1964. 'Bedrock Geology of the Salem Quadrangle and Vicinity." U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1163-A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1989. "Interim Procedures for Estimating Risks Associated with Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and -Dibenzofurans (CODs and CDFs) and 1989 Update," EPA/625/3.89/016, March 1989. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1990a. "Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories"; Office of Drinking Water; April 1990. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1990b. "Region I, RCRA Generators Sorted by Town"; October 11, 1990. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1990c. "Superfund Program, CERCLIS, LIST-8: Site/Event Listing°; October 11, 1989. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1987. "An Overview of Sediment Quality in the United States"; EPA Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Monitoring and Data Support Division; June 1987. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1988. "Interim Sediment Criteria Values for Nonpolar ' Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants"; EPA office of Water Regulations and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division; May 1988. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1989. 'Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: "Environmental Evaluation Manual"; Volume 2; EPA/540/1-89/002, December 1989. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 1970. "Salem Massachusetts Quandrangle"; 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic); Photo-revised 1979. Zen, Ean, Editor, et. al, 1983. Bedrock Geological Map of Massachusetts; U.S. Geological Survey; 1983. �I r� bpi 09123.09 9-2 06440-04 ' 01/15/92 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1 1 a x � t z a a a _ — - APPENDIX A INTERIM SITE CLASSIFICATION FORM 1 INTERIM E CLASSIFICATION FORM DISPOSAL SITE NAME. Hamblet & Haves Co. CONSULTANT NAME. ABB Environmental Services Inc. SITE I.D. NUMBER: 3-2565 SITE I.D. NUMBER: 3-2565 STREET: 128 Corporate Place, 107 Audubon Road STREET: Colonial Road CITY/TOWN: Wakefield STATE: MA ZIP CODE: 01880 CITY/TOWN: Salem STATE: MA ZIP CODE: 01970 CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY FOR DEP USE Complete the following page of form and summarize classification below: DEP Concurrence mments Insufficient YE5 NO Criterion Met Not Met Information T:71 I-.X-1 11 2 2 3 3 4 4 LU 5 6 6 7 , 7 8 9 9 Department's Determwtf6n.onSfte. Classiscat lon Recommended Site Classification: PrlorftT: NomPrfoft: Insufficient- Informatloir t0 Classify Priority Non-Priority Insufficient Information Approved by: to Classify Title: Signature: ZIA 4- Date: Date INTERIM SITE CLASSIFICATION NOTE: Check appropriate box for each criterion indicating whether a criterion is met or not met or if information is inadequate to determine whether a criterion is met. Only one of these three boxes should be checked for each criterion. A disposal site cannot be classified as a non-priority disposal site If information is inadequate for any criterion. Met Not Met [ ] [ X ] 1. Criteria 1 is met If conditions at the disposal site provide the opportunity for direct contact with oil or hazardous materials via open lagoons, drum storage areas and sludges, or If conditions at the disposal site provide the opportunity for direct contact with surface oil or hazardous materials and there is evidence of, or data that indicate, surface contamination at concentrations that could adversely affect human or environmental receptors. Supporting Information and Source: Conditions at the disposal site do not provide the opportunity for direct contact with oil or hazardous materials via open lagoons, drum storage areas, and sludges. There are no lagoons or sludges at the Site. Access to the site is restricted by perimeter fencing. Oil and hazardous materials released at the site are located in the subsurface or are covered by paved surfaces eliminating the potential for direct contact. The only exception is an area of approximately 30 feet by 50 feet of surficial soils exhibiting elevated concentrations of total chromium. These soils are located in an isolated area behind site buildings and away from areas of site worker operations and do not lead to direct contact exposure. In addition, EPA Region 3 uses an action level (78,000 mg/kg) of 5 times the concentration of total chromium detected (13,000 mg/kg at SS-02) for ingestion (direct contact) risks in a residential exposure scenario. EPA Region 3 indicates no risk by worker soil ingestion to tri-valent chromium compounds (USEPA Region III Technical Memorandum, Risk Based Concentration Table, May 8, 1991.) Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. [ ] Additional information is required to determine If Criterion 1 is met. Describe: RA 'M; an, Ow am "a, IM OW go PIN so MW we rm g OW no Met Not Met [ 1 [ X1 2. Criterion 2 is met If there is evidence of or data that indicate the presence of uncontained migrating oil or hazardous materials which exist as a separate phase in groundwater or surface water. Supporting Information and Source: Installation of thirteen monitoring wells at the site and two rounds of groundwater sampling and water level observations have not indentiFied the presence of separate phase liquids in groundwater at the site. No separate phase liquids have been observed on surface water adjacent to the site. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Limfted Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991a; ABB, 1991b) [ ] Additional information is required to determine R Criterion 2 is met. Describe: Met Not Met [ ] [ X ] 3. Criterion 3 is met if there are data that indicate groundwater contamination with oil or hazardous materials at levels exceeding state or federal drinking water standards/guidelines (or detectable levels of contaminants for which there are not state/federal standards or guidelines) and the data c is based on samples taken from a location that: I. is within 2640 feet of a municipal water supply well(s), or Ii. is within a mapped cone of influence of a municipal water supply well(s), or iii. is a private water supply well(s) or potentially affects a private water supply well, unless there are data which indicate: 1. that a hydrogeologic connection does not exist between the groundwater containing oil or hazardous materials and the municipal water supply well, or If. that the identified concentrations of oil or hazardous materials, for which there are no drinking water standards or guidelines, are not and are not likely to be harmful to those drinking the water, or iii. that the oil or hazardous materials have not migrated to and are not likely to migrate to public or private water supply well(s). Su000rtina Information and Source: There are no identified municipal or private potable water supply wells within one-half mile of the site. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991 a; ABB, 1991 b). [ ] Additional information is required to determine if Criterion 3 is met. Describe: Met Not Met [ ) [ X1 ii 4. Criterion 4 is met If there is evidence of, or data that indicate that, a release of oil or hazardous materials at or from the disposal site Into surface water has occurred and that the release Is upstream of a potable surface water supply intake structure or of the recharge area of a municipal well(s). unless there are data that indicate: I. that a hydrogeologic connection between the release of oil or hazardous materials into surface water and the recharge area does not exist, or H. that concentrations of oil or hazardous materials at the surface water supply Intake or the municipal well have not and are not likely to exceed State or Federal drinking water standard/guidelines, or iii. that concentrations of oil or hazardous materials at the surface water supply intake or the municipal well(s), for which there are no drinking water standards or guidelines, are not and are not likely to be harmful to those drinking the water. Supportina Information and Source: There are no potable surface water supply intakes or potable water supply wells downstream of the site. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991a; ABB, 1991b) [ ) -Additional information is required to determine if Criterion 4 is met. Describe: Met Not Met [ ] [ X ] 5. Criterion 5 is met If there is evidence of, or data that indicate that, a release of oil or hazardous materials at or from the disposal site to surface water has resulted or could result in a concentration which exceeds Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the protection of aquatic life or human health. Su000rtina Information and Source: Surface water samples were collected from the area of Mill Pond located north of the site. Samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of the 13 priority pollutant metals. Several of the metals were not detected. Two of the metals tested (hexavalent chromium and lead) exhibited results which exceeded ambient water quality criteria (AWQC) for some of the samples collected. However, the results of hexavalent chromium analyses do not appear to be reliable indicators that heavalent chromium concentrations in the Mill Pond In fact exceed AWQC. One sample detected the presence of hexavalent chromium (at 65 ug/1), even though a duplicate sample collected at the same time from the same location did not indicate the presence of hexavalent chromium. Two other sampling locations did not Indicate the presence of hexavalent chromium in surface water. Total chromium concentrations did not exceed AWQC. If the hexavalent chromium is actually present (and the existing data is inconclusive), it is not widespread throughout the Mill Pond surface water body. The results of lead analyses indicate that Mill Pond water quality exceeds chronic AWQC values only. Lead is not a compound associated with site use or with any of the known releases. The area of the site and the Pond is urban in nature and has been industrialized for at least 100 years. Elevated concentrations of lead in soils and sediments are not uncommon in urban areas. The Mill Pond area receives surface and stormwater runoff from a large, historically commercial/industrial/residential watershed of Salem. No known release from the site to surface water has resulted in or could result in concentrations of lead that might exceed AWQC. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991 a; ABB, 1991 b) [ ] Additional Information is required to determine if Criterion 5 is met. Describe: Met Not Met [ ) [ X ) 6. Criterion 6 is met If there is evidence of, or data that indicate that, the disposal she poses a threat of fire or explosion. Supporting Information and Source: There is no evidence or data to Indicate that the historical releases at the site pose a threat of fire or explosion. [ ] Additional information is required to determine If Criterion 6 is met. Describe: Met Not Met [ 1 [ X 1 7. `Crterion 7 is met If there is evidence, or data that Indicate that there are or there could be air emissions at or from the disposal site which could -,adversely impact human or environmental receptors. Supporting Information and Source: There is no evidence that air emissions resulting from the historical releases at the site could adversely Impact human or environmental receptors. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991a; ABB, 1991b) [ ] Additional information is required to determine if Criterion 6 Is met. Describe: Met Not Met [ ] [ X ] 8. Criterion 8 is met If there is evidence of, or data that indicate that, releases of oil or hazardous materials at or from the disposal site have affected or could affect the human food chain. Supporting Information and Source: There Is no evidence that there are potential human food chain receptors In the area of the site. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase I - Umited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991a; ABB, 1991b) [ ] Additional information is required to determine If Criterion 8 is met. Describe: swim- ft" M m Ir r � � r r r � � � rr r�i +�■� r � � � ir. rr Met Not Met [ ) [ X ) 9. Criterion 9 is met If there are data or any other Information that Indicate that the disposal site may pose a significant or otherwise unacceptable risk of harm to health, safety, public welfare, or to the environment If left in its present state for several years. Note: This criterion is to be used only If none of the previous eight criteria were met, and no additional Information is required. Supporting Information and Source: The site Is located in an urban industrialized area that has been used as a railroad yard and for manufacturing for over 100 years. Access to the site is completely restricted by security fencing and site personnel. There are no Impacts to public or private potable water supplies or agricultural elements from the releases detected at the site. Almost the entire site is paved or covered by buildings eliminating the potential for direct contact to releases and also significantly limiting potential for precipitation infiftration and runoff enhancing contaminant migration. The areas of contaminants are well delineated by investigations conducted at the site and both source areas and likely migration pathways understood. The lateral extent of contaminants detected does not appear to be widespread In significant concentrations, suggesting that the potential for migration of contaminants in soil and groundwater is limited. [ ] Additional information is required to determine If Criterion 9 is met. Refer to Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase 1 - Limited Site Investigation reports by ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB, 1991a; ABB, 1991b) Describe: i .rm 6440-00 01 13 92 '. m i x 0 z W d 6 Q ' 1 APPENDIX B 1 SOIL BORING LOGS & WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAMS 1 L 1 1 FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-1 P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 1 of 1 Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/23/91 Completed 4/23/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D 1 Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 8. 0' Total Depth 16. 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-0. 5 Black Asphalt 0.5-2. 0 17, 21, 23 2 . 0' 1. 5/ Brown med sand and PID 3 . 1 0. 8 gravel, some fn to cs reading sand, dry to damp fill is soil jar 2-4 17, 15, 2 . 0' 2. 0/ Tan to light brown med head- 3 . 1 31, 15 0. 6 sand and gravel, some fn space sand, little cs sand, damp fill 4-6 4, 3 ,4 , 3 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown med sand and gravel, 2 . 6 1. 0 little fn sand, trace cs sand, fill 6-8 3, 2, 3 , 1 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Same as above 2 . 0 0.2 01-SB- 8-10 3 , 2, 1, 1 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Same as above, wet G.W. @ 0 AB1-S5- 0.4 approx. O1-XX 8 . 01 10-12 13, 4, 5, 6 2 . 0' 2 .0/ Light brown fn sand, 3 . 7 0.4 little med sand, trace gravel, well graded, wet 1 12-14 19, 10,7, 2 . 0' 2 .0/ As above,very low recovery 0 9 0. 1 01-SB- 14-16 13 , 17 , , 2 . 0' 2 .0/ 0-0. 51 : Black fn sand 72 AB1-S8- 21, 27 1.0 0. 5-1. 01 : Black cs sand O1-XX and gravel, hydrocarbon odor, wet B.O.B. @ 16. 0' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. /1 lllll ' P%lgl MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. PROJECT: CIBA-GEIGY DATE: 4/23/91 PROJECT No:: 06440-03 DRILLER:T. MARTINELLI, GEOLOGIC INC. LOCATION: SALEM, MA DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER , WELL No.: ABB-1 DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-1 GEOLOGIST: N. MIGLIACCIO 0 CURB BOX CEMENT SEAL BACKRLL•SILICA SAND `>Poy DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL•M BELOW GROUND SURFACE(BGS) SEAL•BENTONITE CHIPS - DEPTH TO TOP OF SAND-4'BGS SCHEDULE 40 PVC r?:�?.'.<� & nv.. 5 RISER 1"DIA '""' ' �.°: :',e,;,� DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN•5'BGS DIAMETER OF HOLE•S" w:k 5yi::: :Sv:9y 10nNB,au- .aR,: SILICA SAND PACK 9 SCHEDULEb PVC SCREEN 2"DUL (SLOT SRE0.010'T DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN•15'BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SAND-16S BOB DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF HOLE-ISN BGS 2 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-2 ' P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 1 of 1 Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/22/91 Completed 4/23/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level C ' Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 8. 0' Total Depth 16' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-0. 1 Black Asphalt 0. 1-2 . 0 8, 12 , 16, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Dark brown to black fn to PID 1 22 1. 1 cs sand, gravel, cinders, reading 5 and slag, damp fill, is soil 0 strong chemical odor jar 3 head- 01-SB- 2-4 8, 15, 31, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown cs sand and gravel, space 1 AB2-S2- 34 1. 3 little fn sand, trace 4 01-XX silt fill, strong solvent- 5 like odor 6 4-6 9, 11, 15, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown to black cs sand and 9 17 1. 7 gravel fill 0 4 6-8 9,8,7, 8 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Same as above 6 0. 6 4 ' 2 O1-SB- 8-10 11,9, 6, 6 2 . 0' 2. 0/ Brown fn to cs sand and GW @ 1 AB2-S5- 0. 9 gravel, wet approx. 0 O1-XX 8. 0' 4 0 10-12 21, 16, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown cs sand and gravel, Sheen 9 16, 13 1.4 some med sand, little fn on soil 1 sand (at tip of spoon) , sample 1 wet at this 12-14 14,8, 8, 2 .0' 2 .0/ 0-1. 11 : Brown med to cs depth1 ' 9 2 .0 sand, little fn sand, 0 trace silt and gravel 4 1. 1-2 .01 : Grey gravel, 0 some cs sand, little fn sand, well sorted dense material, wet 14-16 12 , 50 2 . 0' 1. 0/ Cs sand, little med sand 1 ' 2 . 0 and gravel, trace ,fn sand 1 (running sands at this 8 interval, material here 3 may not be indicative of true conditions) , wet B.O.B. @ 16' L-L ' I ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. AL IN IN ' ll111,151/ MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. PROJECT: CIBA-GEIGY DATE: 4/23/91 , PROJECT No.: 06440-03 DRILLER:T. MARTINELLI, GEOLOGIC INC. LOCATION: SALEM, MA DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER , WELL No.: ABB-2 DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-2 GEOLOGIST: N. MIGLIACCIO O CURB BOX CEMENT SEAL BACKFILL-SBICA � DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL•2'BELOW GROUND SURFACE(BGS) SEAL•BENTONITE SCHEDULE 40 PVC RISER 2"DIA. DEPTH TO TOP OF SAND-4'BGS S DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN•5'BOB tlp�ga oKc� DIAMETER OF HOL 10 SILICA SAND PACK] SCHEDULE 40 P SCREEN 2"DUL yn , (SLOT SIZE 0.010 ?' gs?,ez 1 S ,,;_,,,�. �: DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN•15 BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SAND-15S'BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF HOLE-15.5'BGS ' 20 i 1 i. i BB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-3 P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name . CIBA GEIGY Page 1 of 2 ' Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/24/91 Completed 4/24/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 8 . 0' Total Depth 16. 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by R 7 L Date Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-0.2 Black Asphalt 01-SB- 0. 5-2 . 0 112 , 37, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Dark brown fn to cs sand PID 410 AB3-S1- 53 1. 5 and gravel damp, dense, reading O1-XX fill, slight solvent odor is soil jar 01-SB- 2-4 35, 27, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown fn sand and gravel, head- 192 AB3-S2- 17 , 27 1. 6 some med sand, little space O1-XX slag, coal ash, brick fragments, and cs sand, trace silt, fill 4-6 14 , 14 , 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0 . 31 : As above Change 35 12 , 10 1. 8 0. 3-1 . 8 ' : Black fn in soil unidentified material stati- (possibly coal ash) , some graphy fn sand, gravel, and silt, piece of black stained cloth in spoon tip 6-8 7, 5, 5, 5 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ As above, gravel stuck in G.W. @ 66 0. 4 spoon tip, spoon tip wet. approx. 8 . 0' 8-10 3 , 4, 8, 10 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Dark brown to black fn 194 1. 3 sand, some silt, little med sand, band of black peat from 0. 4-0. 6' of spoon, strong H2S odor, ' wet 10-12 3 ,4, 8, 10 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-1. 01 : Light grey med Rust 99 1. 3 sand, little fn sand, wet stain- 1. 0-1. 31 : Light brown med ing sand and clay, trace silt and fn sand, H2S odor throughout spoon, wet ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-3 P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 2 of 2 Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/24/91 Completed 4/24/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 8 . 0' Total Depth 16 . 0 Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit' No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LE 12-14 19, 20, 2 . 0' 2. 0/ Light brown fn to med Rust 29 17, 27 2 . 0 sand, interbedded with stain- layers of cs sand (0. 8- ing 1. 01 , 1. 4-1. 51 , 1. 9-2 . 01 ) , and layers of silty clay (1. 0-1. 11 , 1. 31 , 1.7-1. 91 ) piece of . 5" diameter glass found in this spoon, strong H2S odor, wet 14-16 7, 11, 15, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0.41 : Tan med sand, 3 20 2 . 0 little fn sand, well graded 0.4-1. 31 : Tan with rust staining silty clay, trace fn sand 1. 3-1. 61 : Tan med sand, trace fn and cs sand 1. 6-2 . 01 : Tan silty clay, trace fn sand, wet B.O.B. @ 16. 0' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I\ 111 ^1�1� MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM ' ABB ENVIRONYEMAL SERVICES,INC. ' PROJECT: CIBA-GEIGY DATE: 4/24/91 PROJECT No.: 06440-03 DRILLER: T. MARTINELLI, GEOLOGIC INC. LOCATION: SALEM, MA DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER WELL No.: ABB-3 DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-3 GEOLOGIST: N. MIGLIACCIO 0 CURB BOX CEMENTSEAL BACKRLL•SILICA SAND __ DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL•S'BELOW GROUND SURFACE(BGS) SEAL•BEHTOMTE CIMPS SCHEDULE 40 PVC a:`riFx:F DEPTH TO TOP OF SAND•1'BGS 5 RISER Z'DULw:.r<- ,„c>y".:;�- DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN•S'BGS `Ya"ti: «aux DIAMETER OF HOLE-$" •• �, 1 KaN`,. weynC SILICA SAND PACK SCHEDULE 40 PVC nka` SCREEN Z'DIA (SLOT SIZE 0.010-) w ti oy 'S DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN-1S BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SAND-163'BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF HOLE-15.5'BGS 2 1 BS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-4 i P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 1 of 2 Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/22/91 Completed 4/22/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 9. 0' Total Depth 17 . 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-0. 3 Black Asphalt, with gravel 0.5-2 . 0 26,21, 18 2. 0' 1. 5/ Brown fn to med sand and PID 1. 1 1. 1 gravel, some cs sand, dry reading fill is soil jar ' 2-4 13, 10, 2. 0' 2 . 0/ Brown (black @ tip) fn head- 1. 7 13 , 17 0.7 to cs sand and gravel space fill, dry ' 4-6 12, 9,4,4 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0. 651 : As above, damp 1. 1 1. 3 0. 65-1. 31 : Red-brown silt, trace organic root matter, . (in first .2 ' of this layer) , moist 6-8 2, 2, 4, 7 2 . 0' 2 .0/ 0-0. 51 : As above, moist 1. 1 2 . 0 0. 5-2 . 01 : Red-brown to grey-brown organic silt and fn sand, trace gravel, wet i01-SB- 8-10 4, 11, 18, 2 .0' 2 .0/ Grey fn sand, some silt, G.W 139 AB4-S5- 21 1. 6 clay, and med to cs sand, may be 01-XX soil components arrangedtidally in bands--river deposits, influ- strong hydrocarbon odor, enced, slight sheen on soil @ true . ' approx. 9 . 01BGS, petroleum G.W. odor occurs under a fn to level @ cs sand layer, wet approx. 9 .0'BGS ' 10-12 8, 15,20, 2. 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0. 81 : Grey med to cs 236 30 2. 0 sand, little fn sand, well graded material, wet 0.8-2. 01 : Grey silt with bands of med to cs sand, trace clay, poorly graded, strong H2S odor/slight petroleum odor, wet ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-4 P'jct No.06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 2 of 2 Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/22/91 Completed 4/22/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 9 . 0' Total Depth 17 . 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit' No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LE 12-14 26,28, 2 . 0' 2 .0/ Grey med sand, little fn 247 27, 35 2 .0 to cs sand, well graded, wet, strong H2S odor/ slight hydrocarbon odor, wet 14-16 1, 6, 10, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0. 51 : Med to cs 144 11 2 . 0 sand, wet blow-in 0. 5-1. 61 : Grey silt, band of fn sand @ 1. 2 ' and 1. 5' , wet 1. 6-2 . 01 : Olive-brown silt, damp, very dense, wet B.O.B. @ 17 ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Alin MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SFAWCES,INC. ' PROJECT: CIBA-GEIGY DATE: 4/22/91 PROJECT No.: 06440-03 DRILLER:T. MARTINELLI, GEOLOGIC INC. II, LOCATION: SALEM, MA DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER WELL No.: ABB-4 DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-4 GEOLOGIST: N. MIGLIACCIO 0 CURB BOX CEMENTSEAL e' BACKFILL-SI1CA SAND DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL-2'BELOW GROUND SURFACE(BGS) ' SEAL-BENTONTE CHIPS DEPTH TO TOP OF SAND-P BGS SCHEDULE 40 PVC . 4ry�� rJ RISER 2"qA <'�y� a"Y - DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN-5'BGS ' DIAMETER OF HOLE-8" .gvq$ a 10 SILICA SAND PACK aara::e ti': `bE`Ri SCHEDULE 40 PVC n�q - SCREEN 2"DUL - (SLOT SIZE 0.010-) ¢. 1 S DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN-15 BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SAND-17.0'BGS 20 DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF HOLE.17.0'BGS BB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-5 ' P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 1 of 1 ' Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/24/91 Completed 4/24/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 5. 0' Total Depth 16. 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-2 7,9, 10, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown fn to med sand and PID 23 11 1. 3 gravel, trace cs sand and reading silt, damp to moist is soil jar O1-SB- 2-4 2, 2, 2, 4 2 .0' 2 .0/ Light brown silt, little head- 540 AB5-S2- 0. 3 gravel, trace fn sand space 01-XX O1-SB- 4-6 3, 57, 16, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown med sand and gravel, PID -- AB5-S3- 3 0.8 some cs sand, little fn reading 01-XX sand, boulder at approx. not 4 .5' BGS, wet ob- tained 6-8 11, 37, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown/grey/black, med to 18 21, 33 1. 5 cs sand and gravel, some organic material, river deposits, wet, H2S odor 8-10 13 , 15,4, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-1.51 : Black cs sand and GW @ 75 9 2 . 0 gravel, little med sand, approx. wet 6. 0' 1. 5-2. 01 : Black fn to med sand, some organic root matter, little silt, wet. 10-12 10,33 , 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0. 31 : Dark grey cs sand 32 14, 30 1. 3 and gravel, wet 0.3-1. 01 : Piece of wood wet 1.0-1. 31 : Grey med sand, some fn sand, well graded, wet 12-14 25, 14, 2 . 0' 2. 0/ 0-1.41 : Grey med sand, 51 14, 12 2. 0 some cs sand, little fn sand, wet 1.4-2 .01 : Grey-brown silt, ' trace fn sand, wet 14-16 11, 19, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Tan fn to med sand, some 103 ' 14, 18 2 . 0 silt, little cs sand, wet B.O.B. @ 16. 0' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. P%IND MONITORING WELL DIaRAM ASS___aSERVICES,« . m@EI @BAaEIG¥ DATE: «a . @ PROJECT No.: a_« mG Im7NELLiGEOLOGIC INC. LOCATION: SALEM, m DRILLING «90 HOLLOW STEM AUGER WELL&: @B DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-5 GEOLOGIST: SMI«e= . � . @ CURB BOX ° BACKm _a_ ■ ■�. @ CEMENT ®® _.��,_<_�_,_m_ CHIPSSEAL.BENTONITE DEPTH mTOP OF_ , _ SCHEDULE 40 PVC a _� D _.nom OF SCREEN Ir SOS DIAMETER OFHOLE . ■ � w SILICA_P ® �i < > � m_LE.PVC ; 7} CRE EN ______� BGS ' , p c . _.nBOTTOM,HOLE- _ 20 . @ � � @ sENvmmEEk■pcsINC . � � FIELD BORING LOG Boring No: ABB-6 P'jct No.06440-03 Project Name Ciba Geigy Page 1 of 1 ' Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/24/91 Completed 4/25/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D Ground E1. Soil Drilled Water Depth 8 . 3 ' Total Depth 16 . 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 ' Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-2 2 , 3 , 11, 2 . 0' 2. 0/ 0-0.31 : Brown organic PID 0 13 1. 9 silt, some fn sand and reading root matter (topsoil) is soil 0. 3-0.71 : Tan fn sand jar 0.7-1. 91 : Brown med to cs head- sand and gravel, little space ' fn sand 2-4 10, 12,8, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Orange-brown cs sand, 0 10 1. 6 some gravel and med sand, trace fn sand 4-6 9,8,7, 8 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Orange-brown cs sand, 1. 5 little med sand and 0 gravel, damp O1-SB- 6-8 8,7, 6, 8 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Orange-brown cs sand, PID -- ' AB6-S4- 1. 4 some med sand, trace reading O1-XX gravel, well graded, damp not ob- tained ' 8-10 6,7,8,8 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ As above, wet 0 1. 4 10-12 4,5,7, 11 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown med to cs sand, GW @ 0 1.4 trace fn sand, well graded approx wet 8 . 0' 12-14 7,9,8, 10 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-1.41 : Brown med sand, 0 1. 6 some cs sand, little fn sand and silt, wet 1.4-1. 61 : Brown gravel, little med sand, wet ' 14-16 12, 19, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown cs sand and gravel, 0 11, 15 1. 0 some fn sand and silt, well sorted, wet B.O.B. @ 16. 0' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 11�I!1! ♦ 1plg MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. PROJECT: CIBA-GEIGY DATE: 4/25/91 , PROJECT No.: 06440-03 DRILLER:T. MARTINELLI, GEOLOGIC INC. LOCATION: SALEM, MA DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER ' WELL No.: ABB-6 DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-6 ' GEOLOGIST: N. MIGLIACCIO 0 CURB BOX CEMENT SEAL BACKFILL•SILICA SANDo"`O q'b� DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL-2•BELOW GROUND SURFACE(BGS) SEAL-BENTONITE CHIPS SCHEDULE 40 PVC DEPTH TO TOP OF SAND•6 BOB 5 RISER Y DIA s .` .v°P`.°:r'• _4�.. DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN•S'BGS DIAMETER OF HOLE-B" .•bea:'' e't; ' 10 �2ceo o�"n SILICA SAND PACKE}'tr""} o�J SCHEDULE 40 PVC SCREEN YDIA (SLOT SIZE 0.0107 5 e"o`te .p DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN•15 BGS ' DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SAND-15H BGS DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF HOLE.15.5'BGS ' 20 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC ' FIELD BORING LOG Boring NO: ABB-7 P'jct No. 06440-03 Project Name CIBA GEIGY Page 1 of 1 Contractor GEOL. Driller MARTINELLI Started 4/23/91 Completed 4/23/91 Method HSA Casing Size HNU/TIP/OVM OVM Protect'n Level D ' Ground E1. . Soil Drilled Water Depth 7 . 0' Total Depth 17 . 0' Logged by NM Ch'd by RDC Date 1-13-92 Sample Depth Blows Spn. Pen Monit'g No. in per 6 size / Description Notes t feet inches Rec PID LEL 0-0.5 Black Asphalt ' 0. 5-2 . 0 25,57, 61 2 . 0' 1. 5/ Dark brown to black med to PID 1. 4 1.4 cs sand, some coal ash reading and cinders, little fn is Soil sand and gravel, trace jar silt, dense, damp, (coal head- ash in layers throughout space spoon) 2-4 120/0.4 2 . 0' 0.4/ Brown med to cs sand and 1.4 0.4 gravel, little fn sand, fill, boulder or cobble at ' approx. 2 . 1' BGS. 4-6 9, 9,8,8 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Red-brown cs sand and Gravel 0. 6 0. 3 gravel, little fn to med in sand, trace silt, dense soon tip 01-SB- 6-8 6, 6,27, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Brown fn to cs sand and G.W. @ 0.8 AB7-S4- 13 1. 0 gravel, wet approx. t 01-XX 7. 0'BGS 8-10 9,11, 11, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ Light brown med to cs sand 1.4 15 1.2 and gravel, little fn sand, wet 10-12 6, 6,8,8 2. 0' 2. 0/ 0-1.21 : Light brown med to 0 2. 0 cs sand, little gravel (rounded) , well graded 1.2-2 . 01 : Light brown fn sand, trace silt, well graded, wet ' 12-14 10, 11, 2 . 0' 2 . 0/ 0-0. 41 : Blow-in material 0. 6 16, 18 2. 0 from above 0.4-2 . 01 : Light brown fn ' sand with lenses of med to cs sand from 1-2 ' of spoon, wet ' B.O.B. @ 17 . 0' ' ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I\ 1111 ' P%1919 MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. ' PROJECT: CIBA-GEIGY DATE: 4/23/91 , PROJECT No.: 06440-03 DRILLER:T. MARTINELLI, GEOLOGIC INC. LOCATION: SALEM, MA DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER ' WELL No.: ABB-7 DEVELOPMENT METHOD: PUMP AND SURGE BORING No.:ABB-7 ' GEOLOGIST: N. MIGLIACCIO O CURB BOX CEMENT SEAL BACKFILL•SILICA SAND `•� ' '��"s DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAL•T BELOW GROUND SURFACE(BGS) SEAL•BENTONTE CHIPS ' SCHEDULE 40 PVC `n s"eea DEPTH TO TOP OF SAND•4'BGS. a 5 RISER I"qA `'.<s`. �^� . DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN•S'BOB c•.xr s ro 10 DIAMETER OF HOLE-S" rR'' Vrya�e •.y.. .N�ti<t. a a SILICA SAND PACK SCHEDULE40 PVC 9%i':$i. roma< SCREEN Z"qA (SLOT SIZE 0.010') •e`a,< 'ff 15 arC: DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SCREEN•1S BGS C1.0 e DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF SAND-Ir BOB BLowax MATERIAL DEPTH TO BOTTOM OF HOLE-1T BOB 20 SB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC 1 1 1 x e W , a Q 1 ' APPENDIX C SUMMARY OF DEPTH TO WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ifii r r r "N o m man i APPENDIX WATER LEVEL DATA 9/18!91 HAMBLET&HAYES FACILITY SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS Z-1.:. Z-2. ,Z®- _ WATER >WATER ! WATER€ WATER TIME ELEVATION TIME ELEVATION:! TIME ELEVATION:' TIME ELEVATION'. 9:10 90.37 9:11 90.82 9:26 90.60 9:26 90.55 10:00 90.43 10:02 90.57 10.09 90.61 10.09 90.68 10:41 90.49 10:41 90.61 10:47 90.62 10:47 90.70 11:21 90.47 11:21 90.54 11:26 90.81 11.26 90.66 12:02 90.46 12:02 90.59 12:06 90.64 12:06 90.70 12:41 90.45 12:41 90.61 12:46 90.54 12:48 90.69 13:20 90.51 13:20 90.67 13:26 90.56 13:26 90.70 14.00 90.49 14:00 . 90.40 14:06 90.58 14:06 90.88 14.40 90.42 14:40 90.54 14:45 90.56 14:45 90.61 FT-AK. BB-) ®8 WATER !, l':WATER WATER:i". WATER TIME ELEVATION: TIME ELEVATION:: TIME 's ELEVATIONS TIME ELEVATION:S 938 90.48 9:10 91.68 9:06 91.57 9:01 92.40 1018 90.51 10:05 91.68 10:07 91.57 9:58 92.40 10:55 90.51 10:43 91.68 10:41 91.57 10:38 92.40 11:34 90.49 11:25 91.69 11:22 91.57 11.17 92.40 12:13 90.49 12:05 91.69 12:02 91.57 11:58 92.40 12:51 90.47 12:43 91.69 12:40 91.57 12:37 92.40 13:32 90.47 1323 91.69 . 13:21 91.56 13:17 92.41 1414 90.47 14:01 91.69 13.59 91.57 - 13:56 92.40 14:52 90.46 14:42 91.69 14:40 91.56 14:37 92.41 APPENDIX C WATER LEVEL DATA 9/18191 HAMBLETB HAVES FACILITY SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS WATER '. t'.WATER I' WATER;.::: WATER TIME : ELEVATIONS TIME -ELEVATION: :TIME ELEVATION': TIME ELEVATION'.: 9:15 90.67 8158 93.21 8:56 91.52 9:31 91.67 10:06 90.60 9:55 93.21 9:55 91.56 10:16 91.67 10.44 90.71 10:35 93.21 10:35 91.56 1052 91.68 11:24 90.65 11:16 93.21 11:16 91.68 11.34 91.67 12:03 90.66 11:55 93.23 11:55 91.53 12:13 91.67 12:43 90.64 12:35 93.22 12:35 91.71 1251 91.67 13:23 90.64 13:15 93.22 13:15 91.53 13:31 91.67 1403 90.64 13:65 93.21 13:55 91.52 14:09 91.57 14:42 90.61 14:35 93.21 14:35 91.63 14:50 91.67 LA LA- 0 WATER r :;WATER ` WATER';;;I :;WATER TIME ELEVATION. TIME ,ELEVATION: TIME ` ELEVATION: TIME ELEVATION. 9:12 91.69 9:03 93.53 9:27 91.64 9:08 91.71 10:07 91.69 9:59 93.57 10.11 91.61 10:04 91.71 10:45 91.69 10:39 93.57 10:49 91.60 10:45 91.72 11:27 91.69 11:21 93.56 11.28 91.55 11:24 91.72 12:06 91.89 1200 93.57 12:08 91.60 12:03 91.72 12:44 91.69 1238 93.57 12:48 91.57 12:41 91.72 13:25 91.69 13:18 93.57 13:17 91.61 13:22 91.71 14:03 91.69 13.57 93.57 14:08 91.59 14:00 91.71 14:19 91.68 14:38 93.57 14:46 91.59 14:41 91.71 NONE APPENDIX C WATER LEVEL DATA 9118/91 HAMBLET&HAYES FACILITY SALEM.MASSACHUSETTS WATER wAIER WATER WATER TIME ELEVATION: TIME ELEVATION. :TIME ELEVATION,- TIME ELEVATION.: 9:36 91.87 8:58 91.55 9:15 91.64 9:24 91.86 10:18 91.87 9:57 91.51 10:10 91.64 10:14 91.90 10:55 91.67 10:37 91.59 10:47 91.64 10:41 91.89 11:36 91.68 11:18 91.59 11:28 91.64 11:33 91.90 12:15 91.68 11:57 91.55 12:08 81.66 12:12 91.92 12:52 91.68 12:38 91.52 12:46 91.66 12:50 91.92 13:33 91.87 13:27 91.52 13:26 91.66 13:30 91.87 14:10 91.67 13:57 91.45 1404 91.66 14:08 91.92 14:52 91.68 14:37 91.64 14:45 91.66 14:49 91.91 SE-4. 8E-5 ;WATER i'.WATER " TIME 'i ELEVATION TIME ELEVATION': NOTES 9:45 92.38 9:19 91.89 (1)Elevations in feet _ 10:14 92.30 10:11 91.69 (2)Elevations referenced to the relative elevation of 10:52 92.41 10:48 91.71 well HLA-6(refer to Section 4.4 and Table 4-1) 11:30 _ 92.39 11:29 91.70 (3)Locations of observation points presented on Figure 6-5 12:11 92.36 12:08 91.70 12:49 92.36 12:47 91.69 1:30 92.39 13:21 91.71 211 92.38 14:05 91.69 2:49 92.41 14:46 91.69 x s Z W a ' a APPENDIX D ' LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS 1 1 1 _ Enseco East I — MAY 2 _1 MAY 21, 1991 &Enseco A CORNING Company li tMs . Diana Jo Baldi Ciba-Geigy Corporation 410 Swing Road P.O. Box Box 18300 Greensboro, North Carolina 27419-8300 Dear Ms. Baldi : Enclosed are the results of the analyses performed on the ten aqueous samples from Hamblett 8 Hayes (Enseco-East Project No. 13795; Purchase Order No. 43978) . These samples were received under chain of custody at Enseco-East Laboratory on May 7, 1991. A brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control and method references employed by Enseco is contained within the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results and should be considered an integral part of this report. Please refer to this project by the Enseco-East Laboratory Project Number to help expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns that you may have. CSincerely, ENSECO-EAS LABORATORY 1 Frank J . Galan Progra Administrator Enc. kf Enseco Incorporaced 2200 Coaonrail Lane 1 Somerset, New Jersey 08875 201/469-5800 Fax: 201/469-7516 , o ' _ ACmj A ummS Camp.nv QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTRCL To ensure data quality, an extensive QA/QC program has been implemented at Enseco-East which incorporates the following controls (as applicable) . Rea ent or analytical blanks are analyzed to assess the level of contamination which exists in the analytical system. An analytical blank, analyzed with every batch of samples, consists of reagents specific to the method. This blank is carried through every aspect of the procedure, including preparation, cleanup, and analysis. Ideally, the concentration , of an analyte in the blank is below the reporting limit for that analyte. However, some common laboratory solvents and metals are difficult to eliminate to the part-per-billion levels commonly reported in environmental analyses. Duplicate Control Samples (DCS) are used to monitor the laboratory' s day-to-day performance of routine analytical methods. A DCS consists of a ' standard, control matrix which is spiked with a group of target compounds representative of the method analytes. The OCS is analyzed with environmental samples to provide evidence that the laboratory is performing the method within accepted QC guidelines. A DCS has been established for most routine analytical methods. Reagent water is used as the control matrix for the analysis of aqueous samples. The DCS compounds are spiked into reagent water and carried through the appropriate steps of the analysis. As stated in SW-846 a(third n ndthereforenuniversal o matrixisused. Thematrix sexist not rsamples solid DCS forsolidsampiesconsists of the appropriate steps of the analysis. The data thus obtained are used to set the DCS control limits. The control limits for accuracy are based on the historical average recovery of the DCS plus or minus three standard i deviation units. The control limits for precision are based on the historical relative percent difference (RPD) and range from zero (no difference between duplicate samples) to the average RPO plus three standard ' deviation units. Surrogates are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of interest to chemical behavior but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Surrogates are routinely added to samples requiring GUMS analysis to monitor the effect of the matrix on the accuracy of the analysis. Results are reported in terms of percent recovery. �rFnseco A Cammq C�moanv 1 ' ANALYTICAL RESULTS The method number provided on each data report sheet refers to a publication originating from a regulatory or standard-setting organization. In general , the methods employed are those specified by the U.S. Environmental ' Protection Agency and other state and federal agencies. In cases where an approved regulatory method does not exist, a method developed by Enseco will be employed to meet the specific needs of the client. The methods commonly employed by Enseco are based on methods from the following references. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020. Cincinnati , OH, March 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical /Chemical Methods (SW-846) ; Washington, D.C. April 1984. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Methods for the Determination_of Organic Compounds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water. Cincinnati , OH, September 1986. Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act, 40 CFR, Part 136; Federal Register, (1984) . American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water ' Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition. Washington, D.C., April 1985. EPA Contract Laboratory ProgramCLP ( ) protocols for the analysis of organic and inorganic hazardous substances. `�Er�seco A Garwq lamp SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION for Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Lab ID Client IDSampled Received Matrix Date Time Date 013795-0001-SA 01-MW-HLA-006-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 08:35 07 MAY 91 , 013795-0002-SA 01-MW-ABB-006-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 09:25 07 MAY 91 013795-0003-SA 01-MW-ABB-004-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 10:10 07 MAY 91 013795-0004-SA 01-MW-HLA-003-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 10:30 07 MAY 91 , 013795-0005-SA 01-MW-ASS-008-OI-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 10:40 07 MAY 91 013795-0006-SA 01-MW-ABB-007-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 11:00 07 MAY 91 013795-0007-SA 01-MW-HLA-005-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 11:35 07 MAY 91 013795-0008-SA 01-MW-ABB-005-01-XX AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 14:55 07 MAY 91 013795-0009-SA 01-MW-ABB-005-01-OUP AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 14:57 07 MAY 91 013795-0009-MS 01-MW-A86-005-01-OUP AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 14:57 07 MAY 91 ' 013795-0009-DU 01-MW-ABB-005-01-DUP AQUEOUS 06 MAY 91 14:57 07 MAY 91 013795-0010-SA O1-R8-003-XXX-OI-XX AQUEOUS , 06 MAY 91 15:30 07 MAY 91 " ISPEnseco A Cammg Gmvan.- Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. ' Client ID: 01-MW-HLA-006-01-XX Lab ID: 013795-0001-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzet Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Oate tChromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 3128 NA 07 MAY 91 ' ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay Gene ral y JE1Seco A Gommg Cam oan� Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Client i0: 01-MW-ABB-006-01-XX Lab ID: 013795-0002-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 312B NA 07 MAY 91 NO Not detected NA - Not applicable , Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay ' Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Client ID: 01-MW-ABB-004-01-XX Lab I0: 013795-0003-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 9.1 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date. Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 3128 NA 07 MAY 91 NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable ' Reported By: .Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay -ufffe—ral oemistry wEmeC0 ' A C�mmg Cam wn. Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. ' Client ID: 01-MW-HLA-003-01-XX Lab ID: 013795-0004-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed ' Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Oats Chromium (VI) 5.5 mg/L 0.50 3128 NA 07 MAY 91 i NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported B P y. Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay ' Generaemi s ry A Camm;gmvanv ' Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. ' Client ID: 01-MW-ABB-008-01-XX Lab ID: 013795-0005-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date tChromium (VI) 5.4 mg/L 0.50 3125 NA 07 MAY 91 i i 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay 1 _�FS1Seco A C�mmg lommnv Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. ' Client I0: 01-MW-ABB-007-01-XX , Lab ID: 013795-0006-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed , Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 3128 NA 07 MAY 91 i 1 1 1 1 ND = Not detected NA - Not applicable ' Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay 6Enseco .A Ca ,g Gmoan� Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Client ID: 01-MW-HLA-005-01-XX Lab ID: 013795-0007-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 3128 NA 07 MAY 91 ' NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay FErisKO n Cammg Gmwn� Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. ' Client I0: 01-MW-ABB-005-01-XX Lab ID: 013795-0008-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS - Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 3128 NA 07 MAY 91 , ND - Not detected ' NA = Not applicable ' Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay Enseco '�Comms�omwn� Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation; Inc. Client ID: 01-MW-ABB-005-01-OUP ' Lab ID: 013795-0009-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Units Reporting Analytical PrMethod epared Analyzed Data Chromium (vI) NO mg/L 0.010 31ZB NA 07 MAY 9? ' NO = Not detected NA' = Not applicable Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay Eris�o 1 Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. ' Client ID: 01-RB-003-XXX-0I-XX Lab ID: 013795-0010-SA 1 Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 06 MAY 91 Received: 07 MAY 91 Authorized: 07 MAY 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed i Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 31 2B NA 07 MAY 91 , i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NO = Not detected ' NA = Not applicable Reported By: Maria Javier Approved By: Deborah Kay 1 "= Erse o MATRIX SPECIFIC QC ' ASSIGNMENT REPORT Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation QC LABORATORY SAMPLE TYPE TEST SAMPLE NUMBER QC LOT MATRIX DUPLICATE CRS-SPEC-AT 013795-0009-DU 07 MAY 91-A MATRIX SPIKE CR6-SPEC-AT 013795-0009-MS 07 MAY 91-A Ense o ' A Cammg Camwn. QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT ' Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation Laboratory QC Lot Number QC Run Number ' Sample Number QC Matrix QC Category (OCS) (SCS/BLANK) 013795-0001-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A , 013795-0002-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0003-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0004-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A ' 013795-0005-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0006-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0007-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0008-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0009-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0009-MS AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A 013795-0009-OU AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A = ' 013795-0010-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 07 MAY 91-A MATRIX SPIKE REPORT =%ErisCo A Camoan� Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation Gemmg Concentration Matrix Amount g; Analyte Sample Spike Spiked Rec Test: CR6-SPEC-AT Matrix AQUEOUS Sample: 013795-0009 Units: mg/L Chromium (VI) NO ND 0.10 NC NO = Not detected. NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable. All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 1 MATRIX DUPLICATE REPORT F eco , A Cummg Cam nn. Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation ' Concentration ' Matrix % Analyte Sample Duplicate RPD Test: CR6-SPEC-AT ' Matrix AQUEOUS Sample: 013795-0009 ' Units: mg/L Chromium (VI) ND NO NC NO = Not detected. ' NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable. ' All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 1 DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT >EILSZCO Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation (ZJmoanv ' Analyte Concentration Accuracy Precisic„ Spiked Measured Avera e ' OCS1 OCS2 AVG DCS Limits OCSPL mi_ ' Category: CR6-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 07 MAY 91-A Concentration Units: mg/L Chromium (VI) 0.100 0.0959 0.0959 0.0959 96 80-120 0.0 Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results . %Enseco-Crco Laboratory CHAIN OF CUSTODY No. 10818 205 Alewife Itrouk Parkway SAMPLE SAFE"CONDITIONS Cambridge,Massacbuseus 02138 617/661-3111 fax:617/354.5258 1.Packed by: Sealy Attn. 2.Seal Infect Upon Receipt by Sampling Co.: Ye No 3.Condition of Contents: I N 7AC T Enseco Client CI (38 — G7`I L - ''// ^^ L 4.Sealed for Shipping by: LvwQ . �LS?I /Vk� Project �AIuaLEr � HAUES SRLF—a, µ/-� V `5.Initial Contents Temp.: _ + -C Seal M _5ql Sampling Co. A66 C`IJV IJUTJIf1E-"-A L Sep-VI CLv, 6.Sampling Status: Done Continuing Until Sampling Site S ALC-NIL. M H- 7.Seal Infect Upon Receipt by Laboratory: Yes No Team Leader_ _tlit PF COL Llf3!� 8.Contents Temperature Upon Receipt by Lab: _ "C 9.Condition of Contents: /Date Time Sample ID/Description Sample Type No. Containers Analysis Paramelers Remarks I S/(, 91 0$3`' of - MW- w-A -out,- of -Ky: CZ WA TK 11 �' r +4 V- 011"' � - OIL' 01 - tAW - A06 -oo(v 01. - )<� _ fol° 01 - eAW — AM - or,4 -oi -1(y A, _ 103, 01 - MW - Ht-A - 003 - 01 > Joq0l -MW - /1 6 . 008 - 01 - x 6 al ul�J - A615 - oo -001 - luw - W-W5 -01 _VV I`�Sc o - MW - A5 - O r "ol —X I I`IS} MAT12rX�sPrKC Q r1S 0I - MW - Ars�i -(3>5-01 - p Ltr_1PL+cA76 _ r I0 (SIO , -128- 00 - XxK. -01- X CUSTODY TRANSFERS PRIOR TO SHI PING SHIPPING DETAILS Relinquished Eby: (signed) Received by: (signed) Dale Time Delivered to Shipper by: __..C1 L]1.1.�LJy I&AAE91A L _— 1 _blC1�-.5�:_t ��� J<l im 0 5/�f ri- L I C Method of Shipment: / `' ` 2 .Received for Lab:_���0���-y1- Signet: .L: SI-;L Date/Time -- --_ Ensoco Project No. I.W_�._�- .____.__.._.___.... _ Waod mupicwl, Imi low ydcr_ ttttttttlt _SS u_� a:uec� -:co :-.:ao ncon ' 4AY 2 d �ggi Enseco ' A CCRNING Company MAY 23, 1991 ' Ms. Diana Baldi Ciba-Geigy Corporation 410 Swing Road ' P.0 Box 18300 Greensboro, NC 27419-8300 Dear Ms. Baldi : Enclosed are the results of the analyses performed on the three soil and one aqueous sample from Salem (Enseco-East Project No. 13606; Purchase Order ' No. 43978) . These samples were received under chain of custody at Enseco-East Laboratory on April 26, 1991. A brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control and method references employed by Enseco is ' contained within the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results and should be considered an integral part of this report. Please refer to this project by the Enseco-East Laboratory Project Number to help expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns that you may have. Sincerely, ' ENSEC�O-EAST LABORATORY rank "Program Administrator ' Enc. kf Enseco Incorporaced 205 Alewife Brook Parkwav Cambridge, SfA 02138 ' 617/661-3111 617/354.5258 IF-nseco A Cumnq��mv,' QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ' To ensure dataualit q y, an extensive QA/QC program has been implemented at Enseco-East which incorporates the following controls (as applicable) . , Reagent or analytical blanks are analyzed to assess the level of ' contamination wnich exists in the analytical system. An analytical blank, analyzed with every batch of samples, consists of reagents specific to the method. This blank is carried through every aspect of the procedure, , including preparation, cleanup, and analysis . Ideally, the concentration of an analyte in the blank is below the reporting limit for that analyte. However, some common laboratory solvents and metals are difficult to eliminate to the part-per-billion levels commonly reported in environmental ' analyses . Duplicate Control Samples (DCS) are used to monitor the laboratory' s , day-to-day performance of routine analytical methods. A DCS consists of a standard, control matrix which is spiked with a group of target compounds representative of the method analytes. The DCS is analyzed with environmental samples to provide evidence that the laboratory is performing ' the method within accepted QC guidelines. A DCS has been established for most routine analytical methods. , Reagent water is used as the control matrix for the analysis of aqueous samples. The DCS compounds are spiked into reagent water and carried through the appropriate steps of the analysis. As stated in SW-846 ' (third edition) , a universal blank matrix does not exist for solid samples and therefore no matrix is used. The DCS for solid samples consists of the appropriate steps of the analysis. The data thus obtained are used to set the DCS control limits. The control limits for accuracy are based on the historical average recovery of the DCS plus or minus three standard deviation units. The control limits for precision are based on the historical relative percent difference (RPD) and range from zero (no ' difference between duplicate samples) to the average RPD plus three standard deviation units. Surrogates are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of ' interest in chemical behavior but which are not normally found in environmental samples . Surrogates are routinely added to samples requiring GC/MS analysis. to monitor the effect of the matrix on the accuracy of the ' analysis . Results are reported in terms of percent recovery. 1 �Enszco A Camu,q Cam oan. ' ANALYTICAL RESULTS The method number provided on each data report sheet refers to a Publication originating from a regulatory or standard-setting organization. In general , the methods employed are those specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other state and federal agencies. In cases where an approved regulatory method does not exist, a method developed by Enseco will be employed to meet the specific needs of the client. The methods commonly employed by Enseco are based on methods from the following references. ' U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020. Cincinnati , OH, March 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical /Chemical Methods. (SW-846) ; Washington, D.C. April 1984. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water. Cincinnati , OH, September 1986. Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act, 40 CFR, Part 136; Federal Register, (1984) . American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition. Washington, D.C., April 1985. EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocols for the analysis of organic and inorganic hazardous substances. vEnseco m ♦CqC"" SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION for Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Sampled Received Lab ID Client I0 Matrix Date Time Date 013606-0001-SA 01-RB-002-XXX-0I-XX AQUEOUS 25 APR 91 14: 15 26 APR 91 ' 013606-0002-SA 01-SB-AB6-S4-01-XX SOIL 25 APR 91 08:30 26 APR 91 013606-0003-SA 01-SB-AB5-S3-01-XX SOIL 25 APR 91 08:30 26 APR 91 013606-0004-SA 01-SB-A83-31-01-XX SOIL 25 APR 91 08:15 26 APR 91 „i 1 i 1 1 I&—FrLsec0 A Cammq C3mDanv Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Client ID: 01-RB-002-XXX-0I-XX Lab ID: 013606-0001-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 APR 91 Received: 26 APR 91 Authorized: 26 APR 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/L 0.010 3126 NA 25 APR o_ 1� 1 1 1 1 NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Michele De Gennaro Approved By: Joasia Przyluska 1 JEnseco� A C�mmg Comwn� Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. 1 Client ID: 01-SB-AB6-S4-01-XX 1 Lab ID: 013606-0002-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 25 APR 91 Received: 26 APR 91 Authorized: 26 APR 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed ' Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/kg 0.053 3126 Mod. 17 MAY 91 17 MAY 91 j 1 1 1 I 1 Percent Moisture is 5.1%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Michele Oe Gennaro Approved By: Deborah h Kay Enseco Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Client ID: 01-SB-ABS-S3-01-XX Lab ID: 013606-0003-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 25 APR 91 Received: 26 APR 91 Authorized: 26 APR 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Chromium (VI) NO mg/kg 0.059 3129 Mod. 17 MAY 91 17 MAY 91 I 1 I Percent Moisture is 15%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. NO. = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Michele De Gennaro Approved By: Deborah Kay r i ry %:,i-i L5zC0� Client Name: Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Inc. Client ID: 01-SB-AB3-S1-01-XX Lab I0: 013606-0004-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 25 APR 91 Received: 26 APR 91 Authorized: 26 APR 91 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Dry Weight Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date care Chromium (VI) NO mg/kg 0.053 3129 Mod. 17 MAY 91 17 MAY 9i Percent Moisture is 5.9%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis . r NO = Not detected NA = Not applicable Reported By: Michele Oe Gennaro Approved By: Deborah Kay �Enseco ' - A Cummg,om:an� QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation Laboratory QC Lot Number Sample Number QC Matrix QC Category (DCS) QC Run Number (SCS/BLANK) 013606-0001-SA AQUEOUS CR6-A 26 APR 91-A _ 013606-0002-SA SOIL CR6-S 17 MAY 91-A 013606-0003-SA SOIL CR6-S 17 MAY 91-A ' 013606-0004-SA SOIL CR6-S 17 MAY 91-A _ r i Enseco DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT - A n Commq Comaa� Wet Chemistry Analysis and Preparation Concentration Accuracy Precs Analyte Spiked Measured Average(°l.) (RPD) DCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS ! _: Category: CR6-A Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 26 APR 91-A Concentration Units: mg/L Chromium (VI) 0.100 0.102 0.102 0.102 102 SQ-120 0.0 Category: CR6-S Matrix: SOIL QC Lot: 17 MAY 91-A Concentration Units: mg/kg Chromium (VI) 0.10 0.0990 0.0970, 0.0980 98 75-125 2.0 Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results' I� M-011—low —011111111 �Enseco-Grco Lauoratory CHAIN OF CUSTODY No. 10815 205 Alewife Rrouk Parkway SAMPLE SAFE"CONDITIONS Cambridge,Massachusetts 02118 - 617/6611111 Fax:617/154-5258 - _ 1.Packed by: Seallf Alin: - 2.Seal Intact Upon Receipt by Sampling Co.: Yes No Enseco Client � ,l r n 1' IRur�rrr�'a�ti-1L I Condition of Contents: 4.Sealed lot Shipping by: Project C IRR- C?£ I69 sti 5. Initial Contents Temp.: "C Sealy .Sampling Co. 6.Sampling Status: Dona Continuing lbdil. I Sampling Site 7.Seal Infect Upon Receipt by Laboratory: Yes No Team Leader 8.Contents Temperature Upon Receipt by Lab: •C 9.Condition of Contents: Date Time Sample ID/Description Sample Type No. Containers Analysis Parameters Hemarks -opa-XXX-vl - Xx ELsr, Alur_ Of x: 30 of - zr ASG Sy -ol -Xx Sy L - I ----- (/ y qI. IQ: , 0An,.S-S3 -01 -x>t I - Vgg1 0I - 56-Aa3-S1 -of - x>t CUSTODY TRANSFERS PRIOR TO SHIPPING SHIPPING DETAILS Hin s'hhe by: ned) Received by: (signed) Dale Time Delivered to Shipper by: I Method o1 Shipment: // AA // Alr/tblll 2 Received for La w'i lk k� Signed i ( �'�! ""' Dule/Till 9 Enseco Project _____ _ _ and Pink Conies 101 ah Yulluw lu Sal....lor S5 Dol icml 'i 1 i i HARMLET AND HAYES LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION PHASE I - REPORT NO. 91E-0527 June 7, 1991 i ' �v vV RinW On FM.yNeO Pe W/ i CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION , ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEY ' CLIENT NAME: CIBA-GEIGY Corporation Hamblet and Hayes PROJECT NAME: Limited Site Investigation, Phase I Salem, MA PROJECT CODE: HHSALEM CHARGE NUMBER: QF-100,OOOS , REPORT NUMBER: 91 E-0527 , REPORT DATE: 07-June-91 hti or John Rissel ' Laboratory Director VvvV PnrttM OnNKydN Piper , REPORT NUMBER: 91 E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-June-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Laboratory Chronicle ETL Client Date Date Designation Designation Matrix Sampled Analyzed 91040969 Trip Blank Water 4/22/91 5/3/91 91040970 01-SB-AB4-S5-01-XX Soil 4/22/91 5/7/91 91040971 01-SB-AB2-S2-01-XX Soil 4/22/91 5/7/91 ' 91040972 01-RB-001-XXX-0I-XX Water 4/23/91 5/7/91 91040973 01-SB-ABI-S8-01-XX Soil 4/23/91 5/9/91 91040974 01-SB-ABI-S5-01-XX Soil 4/23/91 5/3/91 ' 91040975 01-SB-AB7-S4-01-XX Soil 4/23/91 5/7/91 ' 91041061 01-SB-AB3-S1-01-XX Soil 4/24/91 NA 91041062 01-SB-AB5-S3-01-XX Soil 4/24/91 NA 91041063 01-SB-AB6-S4-01-XX Soil 4/25/91 NA 91041064 01-RB-002-XXX-0I-XX Water 4/25/91 NA 91041065 01-RB-002-XXX-0I-XX Water 4/25/91 5/3/91 ' 91041066 Trip Blank Water 4/17/91 5/7/91 91041067 01-SB-AB5-S2-01-XX Soil 4/24/91 5/3/91 91041068 01-SB-AB5-S2-01-XX-D Soil 4/24/91 5/9/91 . 91041069 01-SB-AB2-S5-01-XX Soil 4/25/91 5/7/91 91041169 01-SB-ABB3-S2-01-XX Soil 4/24/91 5/7/91 Note: Volatile organic analyses were not performed on samples 91041061-91041064. Pnn=.RocoW Pa 1 REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-June-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Definitions NO Not detected at or above method detection limit. J Detected but below method detection limit. , B Analyte detected in blank, reported concentration in sample not corrected for amount in blank. NA Not applicable. N/A Not Available. Method Detection Limit. Lowest concentration (amount) that must be present before a reliable and recognizable response is observed for that method ' of analysis. When a sample has been diluted, the Method Detection Limit has been multiplied by the dilution factor. Methodology Volatile organic analyses were performed in accordance with Method 5030 and 8240, r SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste 3rd Edition. Chromium analyses were performed in accordance with Methods 3050 and 5010, SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, 3rd Edition. Petroleum hydrocarbon analyses were performed in accordance with Method 3540, SW-846, Test Methods for EvaluatingSolid Waste and EPA Method 4 et od 18.1. r r ��vt,./ Pnnyp pn RK�c,ap Paper r ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-June-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Nonconformance Summary Holding Time: The following samples were originally analyzed within the fourteen day holding time requirement, but had to be reanalyzed as a low level soil one day over the the holding time. 91040970: Originally analyzed as a high level soil but had to be reanalyzed as a tow level soil one day over the holding time. 1, 91040972: Original analysis had tetrachloroethene contamination. The sample was reanalyzed one day over the holding time. ' 91040973: Originally analyzed as a high level soil but had to be reanalyzed as a low level soil two days over the holding time. 91041068: Originally analyzed as a high level soil but had to be reanalyzed as a low level soil on day over the holding time. 1 91041169: Originally analyzed as a low level soil but had to be reanalyzed as a ' high level soil two days over the holding time. PrimeU on(iancla0 Paper REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles 91040969 METHOD 91040969 METHOD Trip DETECTION Trip DETECTION PARAMETER Blank LIMIT PARAMETER Blank OMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 5.0 Bromomethane NO 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 5.0 Vinyl chloride - NO 10 Trichloroethene - NO 5.0 Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene NO 5.0 Methylene chloride - ND 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO 5.0 Acetone ND 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5,0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene - NO 5.0 Bromoform NO 5.0 ' 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO so trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 50 Chloroform - NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - NO 5,0 ' 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 2-Butanone ND 100 Toluene ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO - 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene - ND 5.0 Vinyl acetate NO _ 50 Styrene NO 5.0 Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene NO 5.0 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug1L) (ug/L) Surrogates % Recoverx: OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 110 :. 76-114% Toluene-d8 96 88-110% ' 4-Bromofluorobenzene 114 86-115% - ��y^ PAGE 1 �./ Pnntm w Recydw Paper REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) , 91040970 METHOD 91040970 METHOD 01-SB-AB4- DETECTION 01-SB-AB4- DETECTIOJ PARAMETER S5-01-XXLIMIT PARAMETER SS-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO - 52 1,2-Dichloropropans NO 26 Bromomethane NO 52 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 2 Vinyl chloride NO 52 Trichloroethene NO 21 Chloroethane NO ' 52 Benzene _ NO - 26 Methylene chloride - ND 26 Chlorodibromomethane NO 2 Acetone NO 520 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 2 Carbon disulfide NO 26 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 20 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 26 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 26 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 26 Bromoform NO 2� 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 26 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 26 trans-1 2-Di h c loroethene NO 26 2-Hexanone NO 260 Chloroform ND- 26 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane N D 2 1,2-Dichloroethane NO . 26 Telrachloroethene NO 2 2-Butanone NO 520 Toluene NO 20 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO _ 26 Chlorobenzene NO 26 Carbon tetrachloride NO 26 Ethylbenzene NO 2 Vinyl acetate NO 260 Styrene NO 21 Bromodichloromethane NO 26 Xylene NO 26 (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ugfkg) , Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 112 70-121% , Toluene-d8 100__ 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108:- 74-121% i Ty^ PAGE 2 �v vt,J Pnnf MRDCVdW Pl REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91040971 METHOD 91040971 METHOD 01-SB-AB2- DETECTION 01-SB-AB2- DETECTION ' - PARAMETER S2-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER S2-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 5300 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 2700 Bromomethane NO 5300 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 2700 Vinyl chloride NO 5300 Trichloroethene 83000 2700 Chloroethane NO 5300 Benzene NO ` 2700 Methylene chloride NO 2700 Chlorodibromomethane NO 2700 Acetone NO 53000 cis-1,3-Dichloropropane NO 2700 Carbon disulfide NO 2700 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2700 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 2700 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 2700 ' 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 2700 Bromoform NO 2700 1,1-Dichloroethane N0. 2700 4-Methyl-2-pentanons NO 27000 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene _ NO 2700 2-Hexanone NO 27000 Chloroform NO 2700 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2700 ' 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 2700 Tetrachloroethene 720000 27000 2-Butanone NO 53000 Toluene NO 2700 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 19000" 2700 Chlorobenzene NO 2700 Carbon tetrachloride NO 2700 Ethylbenzene NO 2700 Vinyl acetate NO 27000 Styrene NO 2700 Bromodichloromethane ND . 2700 Xylene 180000 27000 (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/k9) Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits ' 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 88 70-121% Toluene-d8 100 81-117% 4-Bromofiuorobenzene 156" "' 74-121% Outside OC limits due to matrix interference. T19 PAGE 3 P,,nw..ftgd a Paper REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 1 91040972 METHOD 91040972 METHOD 01-RB-001-- DETECTION 01-RB-001- DETECTI PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-OI-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Oichloropropans NID 5.0 Bromomethane ND 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NID 51 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene NO 5 Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene NO 5.0 Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO 5 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5 Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 5. Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 Bromoform ND I1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND trans NO 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 50 Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5� 1,2-Dichloroethane _ NO 5.0 Tetrachloroethene NO 5 2-Butanone ND 100 Toluene NO 5. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5. Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5rene Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene ND 5� Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Xylene Y NO 5.0 OWL) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) Surrogates "Po Recovee OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 .104 76-114% 1 Toluene-d8 104 88-110% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 86-115% 1 i 1 i T PAGE 4 , �v V� PrmreC on Rec�MPaplr REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' 91040973 METHOD 91040973 METHOD 01-SB-ABI- DETECTION 01-SB-ABi- DETECTION PARAMETER S8-01-XXLIMIT PARAMETER S8-01-XX LIMIT ' Chloromethane NO 54 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 27 Bromomethane NO 54 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 27 a Vinyl chloride NO 54 Trichloroethene NO 27 Chloroethane NO 54 Benzene NO 27 Methylene chloride NO 27 Chlorodibromomethane NO 27 Acetone NO 540 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 27 Carbon disulfide NO• 27 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 27 ' Trichlorofluoromethane - NO, 27 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether - NO 27 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 27 Bromoform -- NO 27 ' 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 27 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 270 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 27 2-Hexanone ND P70 Chloroform NO 27 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 27 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 27 Tetrachloroethene 21 J 27 ' 2-Butanone NO 540 Toluene NO 27 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 27 Chlorobenzene NO 27 Carbon tetrachloride NO 27 Ethylbenzene NO 27 ' Vinyl acetate NO 270 Styrene NO 27 Bromodichloromethane NO 27 Xylene NO 27 (u9/k9) (ug/kg) (ug/kg)' (ug/kg) Surrogates % Recovery' OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108 70-121% Toluene-d8 102 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108 74.121% (�APAGE 5 ' V�Y ftM wRaedwPp REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) , 91040974 METHOD 91040974 METHOD 01-SB-AB1- DETECTION 01-SB-ABt- DETECTION PARAMETER S5-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER S5-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane ND 52 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 26 Bromomethane NO _ 52 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 2� Vinyl chloride NO 52 Trichloroethene ND 2 Chloroethane NO - 52 Benzene NO 26 Methylene chloride ND 26 Chlorodibromomethane NO 2 Acetone NO 520 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 2 Carbon ' o tlisulfide NO 26 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 21 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 26 - I 2 Ch oroethyl vinyl ether NO 26 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 26 Bromoform NO 2 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 2 4_ _ _ 6 Methyl 2 pentanone NO 26' trans-l,2-Dlchlorcethene NO 26 2-Hexanone NO 260 Chloroform ND _ 26 1,1,2,2 Tetrachloroethane NO 2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND - 26 Tetrachloroethene NO 2 2-Butanone NO 520 Toluene ND 2� 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO, 26 Chlorobenzene ND 26 Carbon tetrachloride NO -__ 26 Ethyibenzene NO 2 Vinyl acetate NO 260 Styrene Y NO 21 Bromodichloromethane NO 26 Xylene NO 26 (u9/k9) (u9/k9) (ug/kg) (N9/k9) Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108 - 70-121% Toluene-d8 102 81-117% , 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100: . 74-121% (� !y� PAGE 6 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91040975 METHOD 91040975 METHOD 01-SB-AB7- DETECTION 01-SB-AB7- DETECTION PARAMETER S4-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER S4-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 53 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 26 ' Bromomethane NO - 53 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 26 Vinyl chloride NO ` 53 Trichloroethene NO 26 Chloroethane NO 53 Benzene NO 26 Methylene chloride NO 26 Chlorodibromomethane NO 26 Acetone NO 530 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 26 Carbon disulfide NO 26 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO - 26 Trichlorofluoromethane NO - 26 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 26 ' 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 26 Bromoform NO 26 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 26 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 260 trans-l,2-Oichloroethene NO 26 2-Hexanone NO 260 Chloroform NO 26 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 26 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 26 Tetrachloroethene NO P6 2-Butanone NO 530 Toluene NO 26 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 26 Chlorobenzene NO 26 ' Carbon tetrachloride NO 26 Ethyibenzene NO P6 Vinyl acetate NO 260 Styrene NO 26 Bromodichloromethane NO _...< 26 Xylene NO __ 26 ' (uglkg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) . (ug/kg) Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits ' 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 - 112 70-121% Toluene-d8 100 . 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 118 74-121% PAGE 7 PrintW on R"y Paper REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) , 91041065 METHOD1 9 041065 METHOD 01-RB-002 DETECTION 01-RB-002- OETECTIQJ PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Oichloropropane NO 5.0 Bromomethane NO 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5� Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene NO 5 Chloroethane NO - 10 Benzene - NO 5.0 Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO . 51 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene N0- 5 Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane - NO 5. Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene NO - 5.0 Bromoform - NO 5� 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 50 Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 5 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 Tetrachloroethene NO 5 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene NO 5. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene NO Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene NO 55.,. Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene, NO 5.0 (ug/L) .. (ug/L) (ug/L). (ug/L) ' Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 110 76-114% , Toluene-d8 98 `: 88-110% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 114 86-115% PAGE 8 ��� PnmaE an PwrydaE P�p�r , l ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles ' (Continued) 91041066 METHOD 910x1066, METHOD Trip DETECTION PARAMETER TrDETECTION Blank LIMIT PARAMETER Blank LIMIT Chloromethane ND 10 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 5.0 ' Bromomethane NO 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO - 5.0 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene NO 5.0 Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride NO - 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO 5.0 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - NO - 5.0 Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether - - ND - 5.0 ' 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 Bromoform NO 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO - 50 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 50 ' Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene NO 5.0 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene - :NO: - - 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5.0 ' Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene NO 5.0 Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene NO 5.0 Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene NO5.0 L> (ug/ (ug/L) (ug/L). (ug/L) Surrogates ph Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 _1.10 <;. 76-114% Toluene-d8 100 88-110% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 86-115% 1 IPAGE9 y ���J Prin1W on Ae oe0 Paper REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIEY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 JENVItRONMEaNTALIT'ESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' 91041068 METHOD 91041068 METHOD 01-SB-ABS- DETECTION 01-SB-AB5- DETECTION PARAMETER S2-01-XX-D LIMIT PARAMETER S2-01-XX-D LIMIT Chloromethane ND - 53 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 2 Bromomethane NO 53 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 2 Vinyl chloride - ND - 53 Trichloroethene ND 2k Chloroethane ND 53 Benzene NO 26 Methylene chloride - ND - - 26 Chlorodibromomethane - ND 21 Acetone NO 530 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 2 Carbon disulfide ND 26 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 26 TrichlOrolluoromethane ND 26 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 2 1,1-Dichloroethens NO 26 Bromoform NO 2� 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 26 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 26 trans-l,2-Dichloroethens ND 26 2-Hexanone ND 260 Chloroform ND - 26 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 26 Tetrachloroethene 11 d 2 2-Butanone ND 530 Toluene ND 26 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 26 Chlorobenzene ND 2 Carbon tetrachloride ND 26 Ethylbenzene NO 2 Vinyl acetate NO 265 Styrene ND 21 Bromodichloromethane ND26 Xylene ND ' 26 (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) , Surrogates ^h Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 112 70-121% ' Toluene-d8 100 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 118 74-121% 118 74-121% 1 T(y� PAGE 11 �y vt,J Prlm U RsydW PUN REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07—Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' - 91041067 METHOD 9t 041067 METHOD 01-SS-ABS- DETECTION 01-SB-ABS- DETECTION ' PARAMETER S2-01-XX. LIMIT PARAMETER S2-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 57 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 28 Bromomethane NO 57 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND 2g Vinyl chloride NO 57 Trichloroethene NO 28 Chloroethane NO 57 Benzene NO 28 Methylene chloride NO 28 Chlorodibromomethane ND 28 ' Acetone NO - 570 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 28 Carbon disulfide NO 28 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2g Trichlorofluoromethane NO. 28 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 28 ' - 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 28 Bromoform NO 28. 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 28 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 280 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 28 2-Hexanone NO 280 Chloroform ND 28 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 28 ' 1,2-Dichloroethane NO.. -. 28 Tetrachloroethene ND 28 2-Butanone ND 570 Toluene NO 28 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 28 Chlorobenzene ND 28 ' Carbon tetrachloride NO 28 Ethylbenzene ND 28 Vinyl acetate NO: `- 280 Styrene NO 28 Bromodichloromethane NO 28 Xylene ND 28 (ug/g9) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 116- 70-121% ' Toluene-08 102 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 114' += 74-121% 1 9 PAGE 10 ' ��tf Pnntft Pn R.,VW Pt REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' 91041069 METHOD 91041069 METHOD 01-SS-AB2- DETECTION 01-SB-A82- DETECT PARAMETER S5-01-XX' LIMIT PARAMETER S5-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 130000 1,2-Oichloropropane NO 65000 Bromomethane NO 130000 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 650 Vinyl chloride NO ."i.' 130000 Trichloroethene 290000 650 Chloroethane ND . 130000 Benzene NO 65000 Methylene chloride NO - 65000 Chlorodibromomethane NO 650 Acetone NO - 1300000 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 650 Carbon disulfide NO 65000 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 650 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 65000 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 65000 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 65000 Bromoform NO 6501 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 65000 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 6500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 65000 2-Hexanone NO 650000 Chloroform NO 65000 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 650 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 65000 Tetrachloroethene 970000 650 2-Butanone NO 1300000 Toluene 120000 6501 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 630000 65000 Chlorobenzene NO 65000 Carbon tetrachloride NO 65000 Ethylbenzene 140000 6501 Vinyl acetate NO 650000 Styrene NO 650 Bromodichloromethane NO 65000 Xylene 1800000 65000 (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg), Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 NO 70-121% Toluene-d8 NO 81-117% ' 4-Bromofiuorobenzene NO • 74-121% These surrogates passed OC criteria in the original analysis, , but were diluted out when reanalyzed. y^ PAGE 12 ���./ PrinnE an RK}CIeC Poper ' 1 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 1 Volatiles (Continued) 1 91041169 METHOD 91041169 METHOD 1 PARAMETER 01-SB-ABB3- DETECTION 01-SB-AB83- DETECTION S2-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER S2-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 5500 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 2800 1 Bromomethane NO 5500 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 2800 Vinyl chloride ND 5500 Trichloroethene NO 2800 Chloroethane NO 5500 Benzene NO 2800 1 Methylene chloride ND 2800 Chlorodibromomethane NO 2800 Acetone NO 55000 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 2800 Carbon disulfide NO 2800 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2800 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 2800 2-Chloroethyi vinyl ether NO 2800 1 1,1-Dichioroethene NO 2800 Bromoform ND' 2800 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 2800 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 28000 trans-l,2-Dichioroethene 3500 2800 2-Hexanone ND- 28000 1 Chloroform NO 2800 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - ND 2800 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 2800 Tetrachioroethene 9400: 2800 2-Butanone NO 55000 Toluene NO 2800 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 2800 Chlorobenzene NO 2800 1 Carbon tetrachloride NO 2800 Ethylbenzene NO 2800 Vinyl acetate NO 28000 Styrene ND 2800 Bromodichloromethane NO 2800 Xylene NO 2800 1 (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (u9/k9) (u9/k9) Surrogates No Recovery. OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 112 70-121% 1 Toluene-d8 100 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 74-121% 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 T9 PAGE 13 �v v�./ PrinteC on Nac)NIE Paper REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Metals ' 91041061 METHOD 91041062 METHOD 01-SB-AB3- DETECTION 01-SB-AB5- DETECTION PARAMETER S1-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER S3-01-XX LIMIT tChromium 810 20 Chromium 1700 20 (mg/kg). (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 91041063; METHOD 91041064 METHOD ' - 01-SB-AB6- DETECTION 01-RB-002- DETECTION_ PARAMETER S4-01-XXLIMIT PARAMETER XXX-01-XX LIMIT Chromium 11. 2.0 Chromium NO 2.0 (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/L) (mg/L) 1 1 T9 PAGE 14 Pring mRect,W Paaf REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION' 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Traditional Parameters 91040970 METHOD 91040973 METHOD 01-SB-AB4- DETECTION 01-SB-AB1- DETECTION PARAMETER S5-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER S8-01-XX LIMIT Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 900 200 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 450 200 (mgfkg) (mg)kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) �I r T9 PAGE 15 �v v�J PrintW on Rx)d"Pe CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY CI.BA-GEIGY CERTIFIED UB M 15265 ROUTE 37 W NC CERTIFIED UB•N 297 TOMS RIVER,NJ 08754 / AL CERTIFIED UB N 40490 (908)349-5200 or (800)962-6933 OTHER CERTIFICATION: ✓ 3 FAX(908)505-9195 PAGE OF SEVAH AREA. NF RMATI N R V DED BY CLIEN7 FUSE ONLY SAMPLING INFORMATION CONTAINER TYPE, SIZE/PRESERVATIVE: PCODE: 1Sampled by: IC3v ,.r:. 0 Signature: .�. J J Plant Site:I1711MW 6 IIAYB.�, SAfmH F tL DUE DATE: Area/ >< 11 '^ 3NIlS �l Title: Compen : 'I'll f(WIR(A81RtTTAI. Division: Bld O O � T J d Z INVOICE TO: Phone M: r,17 Y4`, -fOv. Ext: Cher eM: q►-100(X)pS Z �Z Z zzir #OF SAMPLE NO. l ATE TIME MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST/COMMENTS BOTTLES a1 4:IS 60- C 0I-56-A63-51-01-XK, lol- 1 Ch i z 9t 91 1.2.01 _ 01-S13 -53-vi -xx, I < iO4/iu b3Ilyas 9) $;30 01- S3-A66-Sy-01 -XY, I x l I iue/iLG 95 41 IYus WHI of- Q3 vol xsx-of-x>< : � I "041idGS" X91 1LI:PS ol- R4 -o0q -xx � -of-'cX iosiiuG 6 I 91 — TQIp [ AA)K iuS�id6 51 1/155- So.L ol- Sg -q3S-Sa o! - xK I �( Sort of 53 A35 - sa -w �x•l l K revs//u6 -.00"1 /}: /S -50-C ol- S Ala=5S-ol -xx x J CUSTODY SEAL B TACT7 WAI H Y: 1 nalure) DiTEi TIME AE(pfEDfpA LABORATORY BY:(Slpnalure) DATETIME, SAMPLES COLD? WA i000 SAMPLESPRESERVEO7 Y N NIARECEIVED BY:(Slanal e) REMARK HEADSPACE IN VON 7 N NIA VOA TEFLON SIDE DOWN? WN NIA RELINOUISIIED BY.(SiVnalwe) - COMMENTS: _ RECEIVED BY:(Sienalwe) -- 4 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY CBA—GEIGY NJ CERTIFIED LAB M 15265 . ROUTE 37 W NC CERTIFIED LAB I 297 TO RIVER,NJ 08754 AL CERTIFIED LAB 40190 (909)349-5200 or (900)962-693e* • : '. � 1 OTHER CERTIFICATION: ! FAX(9W)5O5-9t95 - PAGE OF SHADED AREA INFORMATION PROVIDED By CLIENT y FOR ETI,US9 ONLY SAMPLING INFORMATION - + CONTAINER TYPE,SIZE/PRES IVE PROJ CT '` r E O ul" Sem ed b . „c. Signature: T Plant Site:IlAlffihUl' 8 IIAYLS, 0 -MKS , r' Title: Coma : NW BIO�111!p01IOTTAL+ Division: alb �� INVOICE TO: - :t of-iowws Plane M: Gl'/ "d! -G!➢o; Ext: =! Char a A:.- g ,+; aCIF SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST/COMMENTS BOTTLES �. , r >. y. CYST OOY SEAL INTACf7 N NIA RELIN ED BY:(ylpnelyre) ,•' DA TME ARECEIFQR LAY�Y(Slpnall+rl� DATE TIME:SAMPLESCOLD? N NIA' -/� �'SAMPLES PRESSRVED7 VN R IVED BY:(91pnalwa) l •" ,_, y/�"'S� /00U HEA9SP4CE IN VOA'S? Y NN/� VOA TEFLON SIDED IN? v N RELINQUISHED BY:(Slpnaj4j6)—Y '4 COAIMENiB: 0 ..�.,,�. O ` RECEIVED BY:(Sipnalure) i REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 Ci BA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY r I r r r _ Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data r Section l: Organics Section If: Metals and Traditional Parameters 1 r r - wv�J PnnuE an A�WW PW.r ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY SECTION I �I ' _ �v v(,./ PnnwEm FcR1aE P0gr WATER VOLATILE MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY Matrix Spike-Sample No.: 91050972 MS/MSD Spike Sample Conc. Conc. OC Limits Added Result MS % MSD % % PARAMETER (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) Rec. (ug/L) Rec. RPD % RPD % Rec. i 1,1-Dichloroethene 50 ND 40 80 49 98 19 ' 14 61-145 Trichloroethene 50 NO 44 88 48 96 9 14 71-120 Benzene 50 ND 48 96 53 106 10 11 76-127 . Toluene 50 ND 46 92 50 100 8 13 76-125 Chlorobenzene 50 NO 48 1 96 1 52 1 104 t 8 13 75-130 ' Outside OC limits due to contamination from Sample carryover. ' ��� Pf111b0 anR�cVp Popar ' 1 Gf :MR PFPFOPMANCE ST:ANDAPD Bromofluoroben=ene (BFB) Relative Abundance Ion Abundance ease Appropriate m'= Criteria Peak Peak Stat ._ - ------- Sq 15-40% of mass 95 24. 46 2 +. 46 O --75 ---------- ---------- k 75 30-6096 of mass 95 53 . 17 53 . 17 Ok 95 Ease peak , 100% relative abundance 100 . 011 100 . 00 Ok 96 5-9% of mass 95 7. 81 7 . 81 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Dk 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 92 . 50 92 . 50 Ok 175 5-9% of mass 174 6 . 66 7. 20 Ok 176 95-101% of mass 174 91 . 66 _ 99 . 09 Ok 117 5-9% of mass 176 6 . 30 6 . 88 Ok 1 Injection Date : 05/03/91 .Injection Time : 14: 47 Data File : >U6282 Scan : 62 SAMPLE 1D DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYSIS t�£G I�-1zY.ifnlJC ? iiuZ�� I l i�� = lr� /c-s1/0/1 4 ➢,o4,5;97as — r-- I APPROUED 9Y: >V6282 50 NG BFB 5/03/91 INSTR#2 . 2ULE25NG/UL 62 NRM File : >V6282 Scan #: 62 Retn . time : 7.54 m/z Int . m/z Int . m/z Int . m/z Int , m/z Int .1 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- 35 . 80 1 . 420 47. 00 1 .553 62 . 00 4. 572 76 . 90 1 . 420 94. 95 100 . 00 36 . 00 1 . 509 49 . 00 4. 794 62 .90 3 . 329 78 . 90 2 . 841 95 . 95 7. 81 37. 00 8 . 123 50 . 00 24. 456 66 .90 1 . 731 80 . 90 3 . 906 103 . 05 1 . 376 38 . 00 6 . 791 51 . 00 7. 901 68 . 00 13 . 094 85 . 95 1 .820 104. 95 1 . 11 39 . 00 5 . 949 55 . 10 3 . 862 68 . 90 13 . 981 86 . 95 8 . 034 119 . 05 1 . 46 39 . 90 26 . 232 56 . 00 2 . 663 71 . 10 1 . 953 87. 95 . 9 . 765 173 . 90 92 . 4 41 . 00 4. 794 57. 00 7.279 72 . 00 2. 086 88 . 95 4. 305 174. 90 6 . 658 42. 00 3 . 640 58 . 00 7. 102 73 . 00 11 . 673 91 . 95 3 . 240 175 . 90 91 . 65 43 . 00 13 . 759 59 . 00 4. 527 74. 00 16 . 334 92 . 85 4. 172 176 . 90 6 . 3 , 43 . 90 27. 297 60 . 00 2 . 530 75 . 00 53 . 174 93 . 95 10 . 786 206 . 95 2 . 708 45 . 00 32 . 401 61 . 00 5 . 814 76 . 00 5 . 593 File >V62»2 35.0-265.0 amu. 50NO BrS 5/03/ TIC 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 77 80 85 12000- 8000- 4000 2000800 400. ».2 ».4 File >V6292 50 NB BFB 5/03/91 I Scan 62 Spk Ab 2253. 7.54 min. 250-0- 174 , 2001 75 80 1500. 100 45 / ° 1 40 I 2V.X 119 40 SO 120 160 200 r GCrM•; PERFORMANCE STANDARD Bromofluoroben=ene (BFB) % Relative Abundance Ion Abundance Base Appropriate -m_Z Criteria Peak Peak Status - ---------------------------------- ---------- ---------- 50 15-40% of mass 95 22 . 73 22 . 73 Ok___ 75 30-60% of mass 95 58 . 47 58 . 47 Ok 95 Base peak , 100% relative abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 C 96 5-9X of mass 95 7. 40 7. 40 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 91 . 83 91 . 83 Ok 175 5-9% of mass 174 6 . 47 7. 05 Ok 176 95-101% of mass 174 88 . 98 96 . 90 Ok 177 5-9% of mass 176 5 . 55 6 . 23 Ok Injection Date : 05/03/91 Injection Time : 15 : 24 Data File : >A0293 Scan : 59 SAMPLE 10 DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYSIS 1 _ - n..f!GLS MA1 APPROVED 8Y F 4+ - �Y* •.�"-q ,�r..r. ^F rwR� rdO.P aS�,; .� C_ 7 _ 3 ! Y a � A0293 50 NG BFB 5/03/91 INSTR;3 2ULe25NG%UL 59 NPM File : >A0293 Scan ;: 59 Retn , time : 5 . 35 miz -- Int . - miz Int , miz Int . miz Int , miz Int - ------------- ------------- ------------- 39 . 00 . 3 . 621 61 . 005 . 547 75 . 00 58 . 475 92 . 00 3 . 775 174. 05 91 . 834 44. 00 8 . 629 68 . 10 10 . 401 76 . 00 4. 931 93 . 00 3 . 621 175 . 05 6 . 47 45 . 10 3 . 621 69 . 10 11 . 402 80 . 90 3 .929 94. 10 10 .863 176 . 05 88 . 98 50 . 10 22 . 727 ?3 . 00 8 . 552 87. 00 3 . 852 95 . 10 100 . 000 17?. 05 5 . 54; 51 . 00 7.627 74. 00 18 . 490 88 . 00 6 . 240 96 . 10 7. 396 Fit* >A0293 35.0-270.0 vu. 50 !03 2UL4 TIC 32 36 4.0 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 600 400 , leo i 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 Ftla >AQ293 50 NO BFB 5"03/91 INSTR•:3 2UL@25N6%U Stan 59 , 8pk Ab 1298. 5.35 •in. 95 i 1200. 17 100 75 80 800- -69 0 SO Q 40 69 44 i Be 20 1 1 11I i i/ III 40 60 80 1 0 1 0 140 160 " s ., J =� GC/mS PERFORMANCE STANDARD Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) % Relative Abundance Ion Abundance Base Appropriate m'= Criteria Peak Peak Status ----- ---------- ____ 50 15-40% of mass 95 'S S" 56 27. 22 - 30-60% of mass 95 0u1 . 6 . . 6 56 . 56 Ok 915 Base peak , 100% relative abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Ok 96 5-9% of mass 95 7. 56 7. 56 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 84. 26 84 . 26 Ck 175 5-9% of mass 174 6 . 46 7. 67 Ok 176 95-101% of mass 174 83 . 37 98 . 94 Ok 177 5-9% of mass 176 6 . 39 7. 67 Ok tInjection Date : 05%06/91 Injection Time : 12 : 48 Data File : >V6298 Scan : 62 SAMPLE ID DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYST Vd�"�-��� "7 ✓v 2n<� nJ 0 7 ✓�3o a .C��`� Iiia-�ori•/d � y[„3�t� /7,7.�- 7 dla3c]i [gar) O 7 1 7 d� Z3 yz' "7 !/le3dy 5� -� ✓�iia 4Iny/1�/ 1u APPROVED BY: 0: r J P >V6298 50 NG BFB 5 '06/91 IN13TR42 21JL@a25NG;i1L 62 NPM 1 Fite : >06299 Scan dp: 62 Petn . time : 7. 56 m%z Int , m'z Int . m!z Int . m/z Int . ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --- 3.7. 00 8 . 484 50 . 00 27. 216 69 . 00 14. 099 91 . 00 3 . 505 9 39 . 00 6 . 599 51 . 00 9 . 591 72 . 10 2 . 818 86 . 05 1 . 924 9, 40 . 00 19 . 599 57. 00 8 . 385 73 . 10 12 . 577 86 . 95 7 , 354 173 . ' 42 . 00 3 . 790 59 . 10 7. 216 74 . 00 17. 398 87, 95 8 . 660 17' 43 . 10 14. 433 61 . 00 6 . 667 75 . 00 56 . 564 89 . 05 5 . 292 17 44 . 00 20 . 550 62 . 00 5 . 292 76 . 00 5 , 292 92 . 95 4. 467 171. 45 . 00 34. 089 63 . 00 4. 055 79 . 00 3 . 996 93 . 95 11 . 959 207 . 49 . 00 5 . 704 69 . 00 13 . 265 File >V6298 35.0-265.0 amu. 50 N 5/06/ TIC 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 8000- 6000- 6.6 00 6006.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 File >V6298 50 NG BFB 5/06/91 IN Scan 62 Bpk Ab 1455. 7.56 min. 160 95 ' 174 1200. 75 B0 80 45 / 74 0 40 207 Ii III IINi rr 1W \ ,. 40 BO 120 160 200 �T. 1 GC/MS PERFORMANCE STANDARD eromoflucrobenzene (6F9) % Relative Abundance ' Ion Abundance Base Appropriate m'z Cr , ter is Peak Pe3 k Stat'_s __________________________________ F5 zF-40% of mass 95 24. 52 24_52 Ck- ca 0-60% of mass 95 54, 35 54 , 35 0k Ease peak , 100% relative abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Ok 96 5-9% of mass 95 7. 32 7. 32 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 90 . 19 90 .19 Ok 175 5-9% of mass 174 6 . 62 7. 34 Ok 176 95-101% of mass 174 88 . 82 98 . 48 Ok ' 177 5-9% of mass 176 6 . 40 7. 21 Ok Injection Date : 05/07/91 Injection Time : 12 : 52 Data File : >Z6316 Scan : 63 SAMPLE ID DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYST vs,,oaa /jV?S -V-STboszp /3i b �Lsrnr'CZ vro3,�_ V5m i S;D 7 I Medi H_a..,/c 7 V68.Ja— /7'!7 (iio�9-71- 7✓��,1,r �/,1 77, APPROVED BY: > t '~ aux '�. K�• - , 3* ��'`�,•,:-� � a"`1 T >Z6316 . 50 NG BF8 5/07/91 INSTR42 21JL@25NG/UL ' 63 NPM ENH File : > Z6316 Sram $: 63 Retm . time : 7. 58 m Int . m/z Int . m/z Int . m/z Int . m/z Ing ------------- ---------- -- ------------- ------------- 717. 00 7. 897 47. 00 388 62 . 00 5 . 334 78 . 90 3 . 602 95 05 1000-- 38 . 00 6 . 959 49 . 00 5 . 500 63 . 00 3 . 020 81 . 00 3 . 962 95 . 95 7, 3 39 . 00 6 . 415 50 . 00 24. 522 68 . 00 13 . 549 85 . 95 1 . 275 118 . 95 . ?y�TJ 40 . 00 24, 480 51 . 00 ?. 9399 . 3 . G a s 6 00 1. 0. 1 86 . 9 , 7. 8 ,57 1 3 . 90 a. 0 . of1 41 . 00 6 . 040 55 . 10 4 4 ? o 3 . 6 4 7_ . UO 1 . 41 8. � . 5 9 . 78 4 c 1 1 4 . . 42 . 00 4. 101 57. 00 9 . 185 73 . 10 10 . 640 89 . 05 4. 323 175 . 90 S9 . 91- 43 . 00 15 : 960 58 . 10 7. 900 74. 00 17. 359 91 . 95 2 . 923 177. 00 6 . 401 44. 00 32 . 945 59 . 00 3 . 159 75 . 00 54. 350 92 . 95 4. 3787 20 . 05 3 . _ 45 . 00 33 . 403 61 . 00 5. 805 76 . 00 5 . 334 93 . 95 11 . 416 Fila >Z6-!16 35.0-265.0 arc". 50 NO FE TIC 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 95 ' 8000 400 5.6 6.9 7,0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4 , F11e >Z6316 50 N8 BFB 5/07/91 IN Scan 63 Spk Ab 1444. ENH 7.58 min. 40 BV B2 1?r0 StiV 2G0 174 12006 75g0 , 80. / i5 74 0 40 207 119 40 so 120 160 200 1 ♦i: GC-'MS PEPFOPMAr1rE _TANCAPD Bromofluoraben_ene (BFB) % Pelat l,- Abundance ' Ice) Abundance Base Appropriate » '- Criteria Peak Peal, - et 50 15-40% of mass. 05 ----i-am4 l----- - _ . 9 ,�. ?5 30-60% of mass 95 50 , 91 50 . '? 1 ilk ?^ Base peak , 100% relati �.,e abundsnce 100 . 01) 100 . 00 Ck 9c 9-9% of mass 95 6 . 08 6 . 08 1?3 Less than 2: of mass 1�4 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 1?4 Greater than 50°6 of mass 95 , 92 7. 92 Ik 5-9% of mass 174 h . 28 9 . 05 Ok 1?d 95-101% of mass 1?4 G , 2 07 ' 7. 6'6 . 3 13k 1 ? 5-'? of mass 1'6 � ., . 96 0 . 43 Ok Injection Date : 35'0'i91 Injection Time : 07 : 4 Data File : ?A0314 Scan : 55 ' 'SA11PLE IG DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME CF ANALYSIS ' ;J.,, >AC 315 5 i_i �i 1 [1;iY +0 C, >Ac3n n41 011.140 q`J �1o4oC 95 "S 7A9 SIA i33rc C1 .:4Jy�5 r;51� �M%3.�J ., 14117 1 1 1 1 APPROVED BY: � 40314 150 t.f1j BFB INS7PIO! 5:7 1 ?I ^4 U 55 NPf1 File : > A0314 Scan ;p: 55 Petn . t1me : m/z Int , m:'_ Int . miz Int . m,'c Int . m, _ nr ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- 4�?7 c�0 . 00 ? '1 . 945 03 . 00 11 . 934 80 u!f 3 . 984 po I)J---6- 17 ?9 . 00 6 . 551) 51 . 10 6 . 887 69 . 10 11 . 749 87 , pii 4. 2F 40 . 00 3 . '1 '4 50 . 00 . 768 �7 i . ; 9 173 . a9 44 . 00 8 . 8 : . 00 , • 01) .a 36'_ 93 . 00 9 . 1549 1?4 . 95 l5 ^'3�. "�1 161 74 . 00 19 . _ 96 94 . 10 1 175 . ' 5 7S 45 . 11) 4 . 389 02 . 00 4 . 591 '5 . 00 513 . '? 12 95 . 00 100 . 000 176 . 5 4 . '3 49 . 00 6 . 077 63 . 00 4 . 0 1 70 . 11) 5 . 334 Ft le 100314 35 .'?-2'O.C' .am-. 50 NG 8F8 INSTRN3 5/7,91 2UL:3 CLP TIC 40 34 4S 152 56 60 64 68 72 600 r 4001 4.;'J 4.70 4.S03.905.005.105.205.30:.405.505.605-'06.30 5 .9) File >A0314 50 N8 8Fe INSTR*:3 ; 5=7%91 2UL.a25N13 U S.an 55 Bok Ab 1481. 5.17 min. 1600 95 100 ,10. 17 ao 75 80 60 , 50 40 40 68 44 \\ 87 20 , Ili fI III 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1 OC/MS PERFORMANCE STANOARO Bromofluorobenzene (8FB) % Relative Abundance ' Ion Abundance Base Appropriate " ''z Criteria Peak Peak Status -- ---------------------------------- ---------- ---------- 50 15-40% of mass 95 23 . 25 23 . 25 -Ok--- ' 'S 30-60% of mass 95 54. 25 54. 25 Ok B 95 ase peak , 100% relative abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Ok 96 5-9% of mass 95 6 . 47 6 . 47 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 90 . 67 90 . 67 Ok 175 5-9% of mass 174 7. 30 8 . 05 Ok 176 95-101% of mass 174 89 . 62 98 . 84 Ok 177 5-9% of mass 176 7. 15 7. 98 Ok Injection Date : 05/07/91 Injection Time : 15 : 20 Data File : >A0321 Scan : 54 SAMPLE ID DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYSIS 'CASS0 C6i 7Ac317 51 1<i i5S7 4C.A&A�J4 7At03)�4 ig4t 'iI64Cg7;- _ 7AJ3,14 A33 i ellcmCiS 7A93;4 1t�i4 C IC kirl 4- 7 A03�9 ,ZJ q [ it r,1S;- 7AC33�t - A�f4�7Gfd) 7ACMA C'5 . _ 9 i 1 i APPROVED BY 1lSNSfBLIl6�di I AC354 50NG8F8 INSTRa3 ; 5 7%91 2ULe25NG/UL , File : >A0321 Scan ;: 54 Petn . time : ' 5 . 20 miz Int . miz Int , miz Int ------------- m;z Int . ------------- ___ _ _ _ m z In ------------- ---------- 4. 214 __ 37. 00 6 . 622 50 . 10 23 . 251 68 . 00 11 . 813 78 . 90 4 214 119 . 00 2 . 487 38 . 10 5 . 869 51 . 10 9 . 105 69 . 10 12 . 114 88 . 00 4. 364 ; 40 . 00 2 . 784 57. 10 1. 3 . 10 B . 5 . 794 74 . 10 5 . 869 93 . 00 4. 665 173 . 95 90 . � 43 . 00 3 . 461 57. 90 2 . 182 74. 10 17. 457 94 . 10 11 . 136 174. 95 7 299 44. 00 8 . 202 61 . 10 4 . 364 75 . 00 54. 251 95 . 00 100. 000 175 . 95 89 . 6 45 . 10 3 . 612 62. 00 4. 439 76 . 10 5 . 041 96 . 10 6 . 471 177. 05 7. 49 . 00 5 . 944 63. 00 4. 439 1� T0.0 0-270.0 afu. N6 FB 44 46 CLP TIC 111111111: 11117�1,05 52 56 60 ' 4.60 4.70 4.80 4.90 5.00 5.10 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.50 5File )50321 50 N6 BfBINSTRi9Bpk Ab 1329. J 5 7 1 2ULB25 5.20 Bin. 95 ,120 17 100 i 80 75 80 i 50 0 40 69 0 ♦4 88 133 � 119 � 0 I. i 1 f j 40 60 BO 1 0 1 0 140 1 0 fin 41 GC 'MS PERFORMANCE STANDARD ' Bromofluoroben_ene (BFBI % Pelati-,e Abundance Ion Abundance Base Appropriate -m__ Criteria Peak Peak Statu- - ------------------------ ---------- 50 15-40% of mass 95 27. 07 � --Ok--- 75 30-60% of mass 95 56 . 98 56 ,98 Ok 95 Base peak , 100% relati -:e abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Ok 96 5-9% of mass 95 6 . 59 6 . 59 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 90 , 43 90 . 43 Ok 175 5-9% of mass 174 7. 37 8 . 15 Ok 116 95- 101% of mass 174 89 . 23 98 .67 Ok 177 5-9% of mass 176 5 . 74 6 . 43 Ok Injection Date : 05/09/91 ' Injection Time : 08 : 12 Data File : >A0349 Scan : 53 SAMPLE ID DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYSIS Q5 oCSC >r!CCSC Sl�il�i� Ce4S JE,ArVALArJK- >A0?Si Q q 1C4CL113 7Au359L q 1, A-Icu >Ad353 _ �2o i ' 9i:4CA1a Qp >Ao.�54 �3i3 APPROVED BY: x' . ` � s a •, s /pr,..a i`' Js'2 � -< _ NA0349 50 NG BFB INSTRl3 5ia/91 2ULe25NG/UL 53 NPM File : ) A0349 Scan #: 53 Retn , time : 5 . 16 ' m!z Int . m:z Int , miz Int . miz Int , miz Int . ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- - 36 . 00 1 . 559 49 . 00 6 . 520 69 , 10 12 . 757 87. 00 5 . 032 96 . 00 6 . 59 3'. 00 9 . 355 50 . 00 27. 073 73 . 00 6 . 237 88 . 00 3 . 756 173 . 95 90 . 432 38 . 10 7.512 51 . 00 6 . 520 74. 00 19 . 206 92 . 00 3 . 189 174. 95 7. 371 40 . 00 3 . 260 61 . 00 5 . 103 75 . 00 56 . 981 93 . 00 5 . 741 175 . 95 89 , 22 44. 00 9 . 001 62 . 00 5 . 741 76 . 00 5 . 670 94. 00 12 . 403 176 . 95 5 . 741 45. 10 5 . 741 68 . 00 13 . 111 80 . 80 3 . 614 95 . 00 100 . 000 Fila >A0349 35.0-270.0 a,,. 50 NO OFS INSTR*3 / / 1 2ULf CLP TIC 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 6000- 4000- 2000- ow 00 400 200 \ 4.'604:704.'804.'405.005.16 15.20 15.'30 5.'40 5.50 5.60 5.TO 15.80 5.90 File >A0349 50 NO 8F8 INSTRt3 1 5/9%91 2UL825N8/U Scan 53 Bpk Ab 1411. 5.16 rain. 95 17 / 100 , 120 75 80 80 / 0 , 50 0 409 37 / 68 87 ,11 II 1 I 20 III I i 40 60 60 160 120 140 160 1 l t^iv.. ,,,,j�• ZX � yy� CC 'MS PERFORMANCE STANOAPD . ' Bromoflucroben=ene (BFB) Relative Abundance len Abundence ease Appropriate m = Criteris Peak--- ' Pe ^ Statu --- -- ---------------------- -- s 50 15-40% of m3_ s 95 25 . 5 . 25 , 55 ------ 0 75 30-60'6 OF mass 95 55 , 40 55 . 40 nG 95 ease peak , 100'6 re lat , �e abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Dk 96 5-9Y of mass �5 7. 34 x , 34 nU '_73 Less than 2'6 of mass 174 0 . 00 0 , 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 9^- . 17 92 . 17 175 5-9% of mass 174Ok 6 . 65 7 . 21 OL 175 95-101"6 of mass 174 . 10009 Ol: 177 5-9% Of mass 176 6 . 23 6 . 76 injectic- Dafe : I39Z/10/01 ' lnjecticn Time : OS : 39 De t.3 c, i 1 e • ) 04 3 6 [r` Scan : 61 SAMPLE 10 DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYS ? t5iOo5� �J 036b 5�,a�q, neap JOABLAOV- 7Jb3ia4 1105 g1osoA0A 13,19 ycc3 l igoZ_9lo6p/r 7 > I/(o3?a 9ic��a3 ) ✓GIZ-3 9ioc�x� 0�,.?77 !o V(3'7 9 /9Tr APPROVED BY: l•+r 6365 50 NG BF8 5 '10 '91 INSTP42 21JUV5G/UL ' hl NPM File : >U6365 Scan A: 61 Petn . time : 7. 50 ' m/z int . m/z Int , m/, Int . m/z Int . m/z Inr ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ 37 . 00 8 . 172 49 . 90 5 . 679 62 . 00 5 . 263 76 . 00 6 . 302 Q3 . 95 12 . 11 39 . 00 6 . 994 50 . 00 2`5 . 554 63 . 00 3 . 878 77. 00 1 . 939 94 . 95 100 . Onn 39 . 00 5 . 471 51 . 00 3 . 518 69 . 00 13 . 643 78 , 90 4. 155 95 . 95 7. 34 3 . 90 24. 030 55 . 00 5 . 540 69 . 00 14. 335 81 . 00 4. 363 102 . 95 1 . 87' 41 . 00 6 .5'9 56 . 00 3 . 670 -0 . 00 1 . 901 96 . 95 9 . 241 173 . Q0 Qn- . 17C 42_ . 00 3 . 809 57. 00 10 . 111 72 . 00 2 . 770 87. 95 9 . 349 174. 90 6 . 64 43 . 00 17. 036 58 . 00 6 . 648 73 . 00 11 . 773 88 . 95 4. 017 1?5 . Q0 92 . 24 44. 00 24. 792 59 . 00 3 . 186 74 . 00 18 . 629 91 . 95 3 . 186 176 . 90 6 . 23 45 . 00 30 . 055 61 . 00 6 . 233 75 . 00 55 . 402 92 . 95 3 . 947 File >'J6365 35.0-265.0 amu. 50 NG 6F8 510: , TIC 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 800c- 400C- 6.6 000 400 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8 ,2 ?',4 ' File >V6365 50 N8 BFB 5/10'91 IN Scan 61 Bpk fib 1444. 7.50 min. 95 7 176 , 1:0 80 75 80 45 ,40 � 68 40 103 it r ► L. n tl� ! 0 , 40 60 80 100 1 120 140 160 T' - ' QUANT REPORT Page 1 Operator 10: JULIE Quant Rev: 7 Quant Time : 910503 17: 55 ' Output File : ^A0295 : : O1 Injected at : 910503 17: 11 Data File : )A0295 : : D2 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : UOA BLANK Instrument 10: VOA MSO Misc : INSTR$3 ; 5/03/91 5ML IO File : $USOIL: : O3 Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS ' Last Calibration : 910503 15 : 32 Last Qcal Time : <none> ' Compound R. T. Q ton Area Conc Units ---------- ----------------- ----- ------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 7. 75 128 . 0 27856 50 . 00 ppb ' 14) 1 ,2-Dichloroethane--d4 **SURR*■ 10. 50 65 . 0 57169 41 . 40 ppb 16 ) * 1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 17. 98 114. 0 96208 50 . 00 ppb 24) Trichloroethene 14. 95 130 . 0 2336 2 . 39 ppb 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 22 . 75 117. 0 87631 150 . 00 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d8 **SURR** 21 . 54 98 . 0 78260 48 . 40 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURR** 26 . 47 95 . 0 91964 51 . 08 ppb ' * Compound is ISTD ' F> w TOTAL TOM CNROMATOGRPM File '',P0295 35.0-2'0.0 ••u. TIC LANK N ♦3 ; - 3, 1 , 200 400 600 800 1000 90004> ' 8000 , k 700QOw 6000 °C c r b 5000 • I e � x000 • i � � � '. I 30000- 2000] 000 2000 ^1 1000 24 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 a0 ' Data File : >A0295 : : 02 Quant Output File : ^A0295 : : D1 , Name : VOA BLANK Instrument 10: VOA_MSD Misc : INSTR#3 ; 5%03/91 5ML , Id File: #VSOIL: :D3 Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration: 910503 15 : 32 Last Qcal Time : (none> , Operator 10: JULIE Quant Time : 910503 17:55 ' Injected at : 910503 17: 11 :z A jVIP k- 1 DIJANT PCPr1PT r'; •�, , t F: !e : .,^_35 : : 05 'qua^ ! Pa,,: 5 Ouant Tim. : a10506 ln : ' C=_ ' a File : n o, Injected at : 910503 lc ; rc 6_94: : 04 Dilution Factor : 1 . pnnrr Misc : INSTP;k^_ ; 5.•03:'91 5ML ID Fl ie : :ki In ) : : S "It l e FDA Method SUI-446 8240 (I DLATILE OPi;ANIr ANALYSTS L_ *. Ca1i`_rat :er : 91OF93 17: 1q r_emnevnd P . T. SC an Area Conc Unit ; r ______________________________ ___ ___ __ ' l 'eromor_hloromethane 9 . 80 ^20 64158 50 00 ti ' 14 ) 112-Dichloroethane-d4 **SUPP•• 12 . 42 '_36 172099 56 . 77 prb 16 ) 41 4-Difluorobenzene pp J 19 . 95 476 242030 50 . 00 31 ) >Chlorobenzene-d5 24 . 71 5q6 236043 50 . 00 opt ' 361 Toluene-d9 •*SURP.•+ 23 . 56 567 259034 49 . 04 ppb 40 ) 4-eromofluorobenzene ••SURR•+ ^8 . 91 702 189854 58 . 40 ppb Compound is ISTD I r y�� 7u7r',, iLN LHF6I7.17uunnfl �ll,i %VOCJi J.�. .V-GO�.V iNLL. - vn DLni,n iN�irt62 T:C ii{ , ' inn ypn Fnn .:nn lnnn I 11400001 I � I ipnnn. t� ' j i x VI 1VJG0' '•�-� e I E , E 3 i E I i 4 9 I 12 15. 2') Data File : • 1.15^04 : : 04 Ou3nr Ourpu F ! = : ^114'=94x¢ , Name : 1J0A 9LANI! Misc : IP,STP4k^_ ; 5'03'91 5ML Id Fite : V-18240 : : SC , Title : EPA Method SW-946 9240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910503 17: 19 Operator ID: JOANNE , Quant Time : 910506 10 : 15 Injected at : 910503 16 : 05 ' n QUANT REPORT Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Rev: 6 Quant Time : 910503 18 : 03 ;' jtout File : ^V6285 : :05 Injected at : 910503 17: 19 Lite File : >V6285 : :03 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : MEOH BLANK Miac : INSTR#2 ; 5/03/91 100OL: 5ML ,.. J File : #V8240 : : SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS it at Calibration : 910503 17: 19 Compound R. T. Scan# Area Conc Units q ------------------------------ ----- ----- -------- -------- U *8romochloromethane 9 . 79 220 86252 50 . 00 ppb 99 ) 1 .2-Dichloroethane-d4 **SURR** 12 . 40 286 190649 46 .78 ppb 95 16 ) *1 .4-Difluorobenzene 19 . 93 476 360651 50 . 00 ppb 91 ' ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 24. 69 596 324895 50 . 00 ppb 91 toluene-d8 **SURR** 23 . 58 568 375956 50 .66 ppb 94 40 ) 4-8romofluorobenzene **SURR** 28 . 93 703 228459 51 . 05 ppb 88 Compound is ISTD Yn Tn1 TAY !`YO11M01(1G DOM , r .= .0 n_ •_• n __• A .. M Y __ 4Y i 1 _ _ . _ f - I 200 400 600 800 1000 I I i 1 i I ,gnnpn,{ I I I la0000i A I ] e gF In I 1CVVVVI Q w I n 1 i 800004 ' I I 9 I E 1 11 I I evvv�j I i f i 1 II 0 I I 7 m L 1 II h 11 I I 220oe I A 9 1 II II II I ' I ] Il 1 M1 II II 15 I 1 4. I Il I I 14 11 15 I ♦ to le 10 eV e• 4b Je JO ♦V 1 Data File : >V6285 : :03 Quant Output File : ^V6285 : :05 ' Name : MEOH BLANK Misc : 1NSTR#2 ; 5/03/91 1000L:5ML Id File : #V8240: : SC ' Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910503 17: 19 ' Operator I0: JOANNE Quant Time : 910503 18 : 03 Infected at : 910503 17: 19 ' ' QUANT REPORT Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Rev: 6 Quant Time :' 910506 14: 51 ) Injected at : 910506 14: 00 Name : VOA BLANK Output File : U6300 : :D5 Data File : V6300 : : O3 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 ' Misc : -INSTR#2 i 5/06/91 9ML I0 File : #U8240 : : SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS ' Last Calibration : 910506 14: 50 Compound R. T. Q ion Area Conc Units ------------------------------ ----- ----- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 9 . 77 128 . 0 45607 50 . 00 ppb 14) 1 ,2-Dichlorcethane-d4 **SURF.** 12 . 38 65 . 0 115011 50 . 32 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Oifluorobenzene 19 . 95 114. 0 196589 50 . 00 ppb ' 31 ) *Chlarobenzene-d5 24. 71 117. 0 184164 50 . 00 ppb 35 ) Tetrachloroethene 22 . 41 164. 0 11356 5 . 77 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d8 **SURR** 23 . 60 98 . 0 197567 48 . 72 ppb ' 37) Toluene 23 . 76 92 . 0 2116 . 72 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURR** 28 . 95 95 . 0 131715 51 . 58 ppb ' * Compound is ISTD 1. . 1 1 TOTAL, ION CHROMATOGRAM - File tY63QQ 35.0-265.0 "U. VOA BLANK. INSTFZ#Z 15% 6%91 TIC 200 400 600 800 1000 , 10000 90000. 8000 ' 70090- 60000- 004 6000 j v M 50000. s Q i 40000- 30000- e 000 3000 s 2000 0. m 1000 L , 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 4Q ' Data File : >V6300 : : 03 Quant Output File : ^V6300 : : D5 ' Name : VOA BLANK Misc : INSTR#2 i 5/06/91 5ML Id File : #V8240 : : SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS , Last Calibration : 910506 14: 50 Operator ID: JOANNE ' Quant Time : 910506 14: 51 Injected at : 910506 14: 00 1 - Tye + r 5 r. tLY sir V. .t.!` 01, 4A - ♦� � � u tel" - n �3 �¢�,s �. � �}, ' QUANT REPORT Operator TO: JOANNE Quant Rev: 6 Quant Time : 910506 15 : 40 Output File : ^V6301 : : 05 Injected at : 910506 14: 56 Data File : >V6301 : : 03 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : MEOH BLANK ' Misc : INSTR#2 ) 5/06/91 1000L: 5ML ID File : #V8240 : : SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS ' Last Calibration : 910506 14:50 Compound R. T. Q ion Area Conc Units ' ------------------------------ ----- ----- -------- -------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 9 . 71 129 . 0 50537 50 , 00 ppb 14) 1 ,2-Dichlorcethane-d4 **SURR** 12 . 36 65 . 0 117920 46 . 56 ppb ' 16 ), *1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 19 . 93 114. 0 225762 50 . 00 ppb 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 24. 73 117. 0 200932 50 . 00 ppb 35 ) Tetrachlorcethene 22 . 43 164, 0 11212 5 . 22 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d8 **SURR** 23 . 58 98 . 0 221487 50 . 06 ppb ' 37) Toluene 23 . 74 92 . 0 2506 . 78 ppb 40 ) 4-13romofluorobenzene **SURR** 28 . 93 95 . 0 137735 49 . 44 ppb 42 ) Xylene 30 . 63 106 . 0 4646 1 . 82 ppb ' * Compound is ISTD 1 v yy� Xr k 1 s.c Y �.�r L L a 1y�✓ wi tr `� t�a, �{ `��¢s, Yi un 4'i. 3.,5�ej�p� Y :.1. ....-p';�{r� d—" ..+..' �ra ' C 4e ` ir 5-i�S-F ' .. w 4'*�a +y�.,.i,? j7'.• � _J,3 . . p TOTGL ION CHROMRT06RaM ' F:le >Y63% 33.0-265.0 aau. TIC 'iH BLANK INRic ,Oei' i 200 400 600 800 1000 ' 100000. 9000 ' 8000 v N 7000 � c I u c a C5 5000011 n 5 o 40001> E t 30000. 3 L N 2000 E I ' 7 m lnnn,}1 gFl. '1 W{' II1JI( 42 ' 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Data File : >V6301 : : 03 Quant Output File : ^V6301 : : D5 , Name : MEOH BLANK Misc : INSTR$2 ; 5/06/91 1000L: 5ML , Id File : #V8240 : : SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS , Last Calibration : 910506 14: 50 Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Time : 910506 15 : 40 ' Injected at : 910506 14:56 1 a :.c vi �Y A SQUANT REPORT Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Rev: '6 Quant Time : 910506 16 : 29 Output File : ^Z6300 : : 05 Injected at : 910506 15 : 45 Data File : >Z6300 : : D3 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : VOA BLANK Misc : INSTR#2 ) 5/06/91 5ML 11) File : #U8240 : : SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 UOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910506 14: 50 Compound R.. T. Q ion Area Conc Units ------------------------------ ----- ----- -------- -------- ------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 9 . 82 128 . 0 45818 50 . 00 PPb 14) 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 **SURR** 12 . 44 65 . 0 112945 49 . 19 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 20 . 01 114. 0 205670 50 . 00 ppb 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 24. 77 117. 0 189889 50 . 00 ppb 35 ) Tetrachloroethene 22 . 47 164. 0 8024 3 . 95 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d8 **SURR** 23 . 62 98 . 0 204362 48 . 87 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURR** 29 . 01 95 . 0 136906 52 . 00 ppb ' * Compound is ISTD Y �A i rn L ♦� .ir'f1 �'�' T1 .l§�tYA��`f �: SYF ry} .y�C V.d. ~ yr ; TOTAL IOM CHROMATOGRAM File >Z6300 35.0-at5.0 amu. 'TOC LANK 1N3 •c 5,06,91 200 400 600 800 1000 10000 Q- 90000- 5000t> 0005000 u a 3 o E U E 4000 £ ° c + 3oue N 2000 � — m 1004 3 A 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Data File : >Z6300 : : D3 Quant Output File : ^Z6300 : : D5 Name : VOA BLANK Miac : INSTR#2 ) 5/06/91 5ML Id File : #V8240 : : Sr_ Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910506 14: 50 Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Time : 910506 16 : 28 Injected at : 910506 15 :45 1� n 1 QUANT REPORT loerator ID: JOANNE Quant Rev: 6 Quant Time : 910508 08 : 02 utout File.: ^V6323: : D5 Infected at : 910507 18 : 35 uata File : >V6323 : : D3 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : MEOH BLANK isc : INSTR#2 ; 5/07/91 100OL: 5ML ID File : #V8240 : :SC itle : EPA Method SW-846 8240 UOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS ast Calibration : 910508 07: 58 Compound R. T. Scan# Area Conc Unite o ------------------------------ ----- ----- -------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 9 . 63 215 50547 50 . 00 ppb 99 14) 1 .2-Dichloroethane-d4 **SURR** 12 . 33 283 123794 45 . 11 ppb 96 ' 6 ) *1 .4-Difluorobenzene 19. 90 474 228766 50 . 00 ppb 90 _ 1 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 24. 69 595 216283 50 . 00 ppb 91 35 ) Tetrachloroethene 22 . 43 538 10637 5 . 89 ppb 94 6 ) Toluene-d8 **SURR** 23 . 54 566 229267 49. 70 ppb 95 10 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURR** 28 .89 701 154607 49 . 45 ppb 87 * Compound is ISTD 1 Ify fi Tr_1 T(11_ T(1U f UOI1 Mr1 T/1COI1M I .'___ . .____ _ .. __ .. --_• TIC.. I 200 400 600 . . . 1000 I I I i i � I I LeVVV V, I 1 I i 11VVVVj I I s I 1'J V V V'JI I 1 � I I 7VVV' t r_ r , I 1 a~ I evvvsrl 1 r I 'v„vvjbvvvvl I 1 g g a ; I I ovvvvi # 1 j ' I t a a I 4vvvv-i S I 1 4 I ll I I I avvvv i g vl I I l M I 1 # 1 1 1 II I I evvv'Jy dS I 1 1 I A A I I I I I Lvvvv I p 1 II '91 II f I I 1 Il If II 1 1114 _t L _n I r • to 1e 1e ev e4 etl 3e jb 4V I Data File : >V6323 : : 03 Quant Output File : ^V6323: : 05 Name : MEOH BLANK Msec : INSTR#2 ; 5/07/91 1000L: 5ML Id File : #V8240: : SC Title: EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration: 910508 07:58 Operator 10: JOANNE Quant Time : 910508 08: 02 Iniected at : 910507 18 : 35 �'•-1 ..�` Y '.i�'M iJk '£ . T :- r `� t �'.M `4 '�+w,�{. r:.:.r/ t <.. I � OUANT REPORT P3Qe L ` Operator ID: TERRY Ouant Rev: 7 Quant Time : 910507 10 : 57 Output File : ^A0316 : : O1 Injected at : 410507 10 : 1. Data File : ` A0316 : : D4 Dilution Factor : 1 , 13131) ):j Name : l!OA BLANK Misr : 5%7'9 z Instrument ID: VDA_MSD _ 1 [hISTP.1k. ML ID File : IWSOIL: : D3 Title : EFA Method SIA-846 8240 U13LATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910503 15 : 32 Last Ocal Time : 910507 08 : 2'' -----------Compound----------- -R-T_ Q ion Area --Con--- Units ----- -------- ------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 7. 74 129 . 0 20612 50 , 00 ppb 14) 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 **SURF,** 10 . 49 65 . 0 47913 52 . 21 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 17. 97 114. 0 72013 50 . 00 ppb 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 22 . 74 117. 0 65416 50 . 00 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d8 **BURR** 21 . 52 99 . 0 59058 50 . 12 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURR** 26 , 46 95 . 0 74145 51 . 61 ppb * Compound is ISTD TOTAL ION CHROMATOGRUM File .1+'7316 35 .0-27V.V amu. 'T 11 oLRNK5 . 5. ;. �, i iNsiRrt3 c00 4U11 6U0 3Q0 1UVU _ JJ] c 5 JV'Jd ; N !J s c QN is b 4VUVC c t �� o � a Si rd = m 4 Lt S m 2r.i]fi. - 1JU0 p i 4 m 12 1n 2V 24 26 S2 dm 40 Data File : 1A0316 : : C4 Quant. Cut.put. File : ^A0316 : : 01 Name : th_A BLAIN Instrument I0 : VOAMSD Misr_ : 5 , ,91 . IHSTP43 5ML — Id File : #USOIL: : 03 Title : EPA Method 31.1-346 9240 VOLATILE OPGP NIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910503 15 : 32 Last Qr_a1 Time : 91050.7 09 : 29 Operator ID: TERRY Quant Time : 910507' 10 : 57 Injected at : 910507 10 : 13 QUANT REPORT Page 1 Operator ID: TERRY Ouant Rev: 7 Quant Time : 910508 11 : 45 Output File : ^A0324: :D1 Injected at : 910507 18 : 41 Data File : >A0324: :04 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : VOA BLANK Instrument 10: VOA MSD M:sc : INSTR#3 ; 5/7/91 5ML 1 ID File : #U8240 : : D2 Title: EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910502 11 : 21 Last Ocal Time : 910507 15 : 57 1APAS • �j,C5C4 1 Compound R. T. Scan# Area Conc Units --------------------------- ----- _ --- ----- -------- -------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 7. 69 179 19102 50 . 00 ppb 14 ) 1 ,2-Oichloroethane-d4 **SURR** 10 . 48 248 45722 52 . 18 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 17. 92 432 77352 50 . 00 ppb 54 --373-- 1026 - --. 559, ppb 311 *rhlorobenzene-d5 22 . 69 550 72422 50 . 00 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d9 **BURP** 21 . 52 521 63797 50 . 60 ppb 4V 4-13romofluorobenzene **SURR** 26 . 41 642 81633 50 . 37 ppb Compound is ISTD ut�Et 1 3 i.s y t >v tOTQL ION CNP1)MQT)GPaM F{ 1# >00;2 35.0-2'0.0 a•u. TIC BLANK N # I 1 200 400 600 800 1000 9000 8000 '000 k 6000 5070 4o 0o a g � • soon S $ 9 2 2 4t 20000. ? 5 _ 3 c E loon m 26 a 8 12 16 20 2a 28 32 36 40 I Data File : >A0324: : 04 Quant Output File: ^A0324: : 01 , Name: VOA BLANK I Instrument 10: VOA MSO Misc: INSTR#3 ) 5/7:91 5 M Id File : #V8240: : 02 Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration: 910502 11 : 21 Last Qcal Time : 910507 15 :57 Operator 10: TERRY Quant Time : 910508 11 :45 Injected at : 910507 18: 41 4 'f�- k r .y i- S iv OUANT PEPOPT Page 1 Operator IC': TERRY Quant Re ,: 7 Quant Time : 910509 11 : 02 Output File : ^A0351 : : 01 Injected at : 910509 10 : 18 Data File : ♦A0351 : :04 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : VOA BLANK Instrument f0: VOA MSO Misc : INSTRU .; 5,9:91 5ML — ID File : 4VSCIL: : 03 Title : EPA Method SW-846 9240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910503 15 : 32 Last Qcal Time: 910509 08 : 49 Compound R. T. 0 for Area Conr Units --------------------------- ----- ----- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane ?. 69 128 . 0 26672 50 . 00 ppb 14) 1 , '.-Dichloroethane-d4 **SURP** 10 . 48 65 . 0 61428 53 . 67 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Oifluorobenzene 17. 92 114. 0 82333 50 . 00 ppb 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 22 . 69 117. 0 68726 50 . 00 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d9 **SUP.R** 21 .52 98 . 0 68531 49 . 64 ppb 40 ) 4-BromoFluoroben=ene **SUP.P.** 26 . 41 95 . 0 79393 53 . 88 ppb Compound is ISTD TOTAL 1011 CNR�:MATOORan File .A0!`.•1 35.0-270.0 4w. '� w BLAB. N.T •3 i • fL 5 TIC 200 400 600 800 1000 °000 8000 N 6000 K � 5'J0Q. n t1 j a � Jf 4000 �i m e e 3000k> E e G u 2000 C '? ` c e+ r m 10000. 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Data File : >A0351 : : D4 Quant Output File : ^A0351 : : Dl i Name : VOA BLANK Instrument ID: VOA_MSD Miac : INSTR43 ; 5/9.-91 5ML Id File : #VSOIL: : D3 Title : EPA Method SW-846 9240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910503 15 : 32 Last Ocal Time: 910509 08 : 48 Operator ID: TERRY Quant Time : 910509 11 : 02 Injected at : 910509 10: 18 l y f4 r ' QUANT REPOPT Op?ra*or ID: JOANNE Ouant Rev' 6 Quant Time : 010510 13 : 65 Output. File : ^V6367: : DG Injected at : 910510 10 : 14 Data File : >U6367: : 03 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 Name : MEOH BLANK Mt --c : INSTR102 ; 5"10,91 1000L: 5ML T. ^ File : dN!9n_40 : : SC T , tle : EPA Method S61-946 9240 UOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Las ' Calibration : 9105 _0 13 : 45 ' Compound R. T. Q ion Are= nr Un1 t , ------------------------------ ----- ----- -------- ---- ---- ----- -- 71 *Bromachloromethane 9 . 67 1^_9 . 9 0 . 00ppb 14) 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 **=URR*- 12 . 3n_ 65 . !) 140004 44. 93 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Oifluoroben==re .o9 1 . 9 11 +: 0 2.9991 50 . 00 ppb ?1 ! "C"t o`_en>ene-d5 24. 65 11'. 0 213 1 50 . 00 ppb TO .uene-d8 **SUP.P** n� c . 09 _. . . + 0 249956 5^_ . 13 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluoroben-ene **SUPP,** 29 . 95 95 . 0 146234 49 . 41P�b r * Compourd . s :STD 1 1 1 y REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0527 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION t07-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 SECTION If 1 ' ��Q Pnmw an Pegeea Paper WATER METALS MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATE RESULTS Sample spiked: 91041063 Spike I.D.: 91000700,91040701 Method Method MS Sample I Duplicate OC Limits Detection Blank % Result Result % PARAMETER Limit(ug/L) (ug/L) Rec. (ug/kg) (ug/kg) RPD %Rec. % RPD jfChromium 20 6.6 87 11000 10000 9.5 82-119 21 L WATER, TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS MATRIX SPIMMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERIES ' Sample spiked: 91040105 Spikel.D.: 91040700,91040701 Method Method MSMSD ' Detection Blank % % % PARAMETER Limit(mg/kg) (mg/kg) Rec. Rec. RPD TPHC 12.3 18 82 9 82.7 0.2 a �vUQ Pimp OnRKyfJM Pqw >A0370 50 NG BFB 5/10/91 INSTR$3 2UL@25NG/UL 53 NRM ' File : >A0370 Scan ¢: 53 Retn , time : 5 . 15 m/z Int , m/z Int . m/z Int . m/z Int , m/z Int . ----- ----- ----- ----- 35 . 90 2 . 013 51 . 10 7. 477 68 . 00-- 12 . 006 78 . 90--- --- 3 . 019 96 . 00 7. 980 37. 00 6 . 470 57. 10 4. 098 69 . 00 11 . 790 80 . 90 2 . 804 173 . 95 90 . 151 38 . 00 7. 045 61 . 00 4, 457 73 . 00 4, 745 87. 00 2 . 588 174 . 95 7 . 045 44. 00 7.692 62 . 00 5 . 607 74 . 00 16 . 391 94. 00 11 . 718 175 . 95 89 , 720 49 . 00 6 . 039 63 . 00 3 . 379 75 . 00 55 . 068 95 , 00 100 . 000 176 . 95 6 . 1ii 50 . 00 23 . 436 File >A0370 35.0-270.0 amu. 50 NG BFB 5/10, CLP TIC 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 600 400. 4 .4 4.6 4.3 5.0 5.2 5 Fit= >A0370 50 NG BFB 5110,91 IN --can 53 BGk Ab 1391. 5 .15 rin. I 35 12V0� 75 o 90 50 40 \` F40 62 r i 40 e0 120 160 SC %M= PFvcppnaNCE STan;napD , P�0mOF1U�rnt+An=?ne fRSR1 15 (7e I at i. .c at�.:nd SnCB i � u�`i_LJanre R�?.P A•'^.0ar -' ----- --- ---- •----------------- FFj 1F_a(] n Oi 5a " 5 OF ^5 . 91 26. o1 nL. 79; 70-6g!_ Of Ms. . OF 56 , 11 - 56 . 11 nL: Oc F�=m peak , 100'5 e j ; . i ,,-P at'._ndance 100 . nn 100 . nn �1r; O6 5-9% 7 f 1 f ec.= 176 nL ' 174 Creat — q-0% OF-in1K OC in ; .prion n_ .o ; nc ,n•, :o+ • •. =rr jnn Time : Pq ; 17 n>ra Fi 1 e `116:11 : C _ ^ : FT J�Tbn cry > VG Hsi. 5�!L R l ;i✓-r 7 via a .x14 c,ws it iZ �.C•CD�q 'Cn Cil• � � gp Nf_ PGP F ..n9 iVt iM TP!E'7 pltl !il`IS�.IC :i li i Fit .n t - ------- ----- . _ _ ------ ------------- _----- -- - -• - - ?� Iln h 9T11 /.._ O(r q OCA 1 _ nn .; . OGT Ot i1n 4 Cn1 C�,� OTO C JC - T , itis ao , ng Sa til iF S C�5 i S ::C I ` 1 I 1iiif4 '. 1 FF 1—1 'Ilia, , cn Hi' GFO coo N[. lois, mlr, ,1 I Gq I I - 1 --' 1 i 45 .a I 1 II riJ J 1 cV .;, iGG IcV IaU Inv I I i f 1 1 _ __ _____ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ __ ____ __ _ __ ______ ___ _ ___- _L___ ___ __� -rh_� na. _ C .n= : = __ �.C. '�•] c,=: JO is t - _ _ ♦� pr.a5 - i m?.= g Oc '?q s•? 4c. :. 1 ill. ! �- Jc_ 1111 ri _ 1 �S Il ll JJ M sc)i+ O� 7 ✓ 17/U /02 -7 7 G'GYdRL 9 ,otr; .09 7vos<37 .10a* <c YJ,9 4j/osb�� 4 Sri ?asry 9/os�So� vc yj� 3 �3/8� � v1vy3a- _fie -3 ? APPPOI.IED EY: 9 r r _ - r ., - __ - - __ - - - -_ _- - • T.,., _. n l _ _ � � C Com:, c : c , n , mac < , it fl / I , I R:i-'yn X511• i •So mini V C1 j I ru i.ri iii ni i gni n nem i"-0 1 i40 50 ?0 100 leo 140 160 I r r r QUANT REPORT Page li Operator ID: JULIE Quant Rev: 7 Quant Time : 910510 10 : 42 Output File : ^A0372: : D1 Injected at : 91051009 : 5 . Data File : >A0372 : :04 Dilution Factor : 1 . 000 Name : VOA BLANK Instrument ID: VOA MSD Misc : INSTR#2 ; 5:10/91 5ML — , ID File : #V8240 : : D2 Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910502 11 : 21 Last Qcal Time : 910510 08 : 35 ' LAMS +� q G50S+5 Compound R. T. 0 ion Area Conc Uni l ------------------------------ -------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 7. 69 128 . 0 35459 50 . 00 ppb 14) 1 ,2-Oichloroethane-d4 **SURR** 10 . 48 65 . 0 67857 47. 42pp b ' 16 ) *1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 17. 96 114. 0 10844 50 . 00 ppb 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 22 . 69 117. 0 89546 50 . 00 ppb 36 ) Toluene-d8 **SURR** 21 . 52 98 . 0 89123 50 . 64 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURF.** 26 . 41 95 . 0 95861 50 . 53 ppb Compound is ISTD , TOTAL ION CHROMATOGRAM ' File >90372 35.0-270.0 anu. VOA SLANK IN M2 Si10�91 TIC 200 400 600 800 10,00. 10000 9000 a000 & a 7000 60000- go 000 • ♦ c a:a ° . 8 � m A ' 4000 E c $ m ° 6 c v ) 3000 ' s _ =_i O $ O u 2000 Im N 1000 . .... . T— iL —J ' 4 9 12 16 20 24 2a 32 36 1 0 Data File : >AIJ37� : : D4 Cuent Output File : ^A03'2 : : D1 Name : VOA BLANK Instrument ID: VOA MSD Misc : INSTP#2 ; 5%'10%91 5ML ' Id File : 40113'240 : : D2 Title : EPA Method SW-346 9240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSTS Last Calibration : 910502 11 : 21 Last. Oral Time : 910510 03 : 35 Operator ID : JULIE Quant Time : 910510 10 : 42 Injected at : 910510 09 : 59 1 ' _ , v - ,- -....'.SIC I� �_ • _ _ . = ' - - - - - -- - ----- --- ---- - --------- - F . r 111 tZ ,1u 1l..nl-e•,-G-,O_r41; ,! .00+a In OIl 'JF I 1 _ I ! a I I II it II 1 1 I ip„nay '�i I ii ii !i ii I j jl. II ij II Ij i i MefFtnrl cm-o T 11 p 11GI^,_,Nit' h� g •n ” ' .�f!'IG I QUANT REPORT Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Re,�: 5 Ouant Time : 910522 1 1 Output File : ^U6415 : : D5 injected at : a s.,, Q . 1 Data File : >V 15 ; ; > ? - 10 . ._ 0 3F. 54 D. Dilution Factor : t , �nnnn' Name : VOA BLANK 9,05pyo , Misc : INSTPik^_ 4"1L ID File : #f !9-'40 : : SC ' Title : EPA M= thud SW-941, 2^_40 UOLAT!LE OPI_ANIC AHALvSIS Last, Cal ihr_ tIon : 910522 1n : 1T P. T. Q Incl A•c3 Cnne: IL. : _____ _____ ________ ________ - 1 ? +6rcmcr_h lorome t 0 , 74 128 . 0 44n0? cn nn 0 -1130713 5n n1 n"h 15 ? +1 , -DiL ! uoroben_ _ne114 . 0 5n , on 31 ? +Ch l or : tan er,e- �` ?4 , ;0 , , n l;0nz 5n . nn tf. ) Toluene-d - 0 e ++'-Ir+c.+ 1 '2595 4q ; zt h -� 1 4 er_'--, F l �r.rrh ._9ne ++r•I ,OC++ ^Q O? O4 1 "114'14 1 ' TOTRL ION :;HROMATOGRAII F3ie :vc415 35.0-ce5.0 amu. TI: cLnrn iNSTnsc ; 5•'cc• 'S TI - - cCC 4n�i F,jn gCn +nnn ?0000 il e0000a Y iU C Sv L Z s 0,3 I 300C.:t1 0 i i , 1 ' I •I II 1 [0 24 41j r:=h a 'C: l a 1 1 1.:,;.,I C tl? !11 o n h Il lt � ♦ C. t o ^l l: ,_,'I c r)r JLI l�I T: � � ,� , CGp No ♦L. ,J ci,l_Q :G 9^I.<Il Ibl! UT TI C IlGhpllr - ^..h!pl -CT - QUANT REPORT Operator 10: JOANNE Quant Rev: 6 Quant Time : 910523 07 : 37 ' Output File : ^U6422 : : O5 Injected at : 910522 15 : 34 _ Data File : >V6422 : : 03 Dilution Factor : 1 . 00000 ' Name : UOA BLANK flus-�9/ Misc : INSTRG'2 ; 5/22/91 5ML ID File : .#U8240 : : SC ' Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910523 07: 34 Compound R. T. Scan# Area Conc Units ------=----------------------- ----- ----- -------- -------- ------- 1 ) *Bromochloromethane 9 . 74 218 42573 50 . 00 ppb 14 ) 1 .2-Dichloroethane-d4 **SURR** 12 . 40 285 114702 52 . 39 ppb 16 ) *1 ,4-Difluorobenzene 19 . 93 475 167129 50 . 00 ppb 9 31 ) *Chlorobenzene-d5 24. 72 596 158522 50 . 00 cob 36 ) Toluene-dB **SURR** 23 . 57 567 184271 52 . 13 ppb 40 ) 4-Bromofluorobenzene **SURR** 28 . 92 702 122597 51 . 92 ppb * Comcound is ISTD , 1 ' rnrm my ruon_r.grnronw zoo TIC I 400 600 Soo 1000 I a I I 90000a I i I I i I tlVVVV7 I ^•• j : K4 I � I I 6000 t j I c rn q c I v c O ovvv%q I 4nnnri = 8 ~ i e I 1 � � m I 300001 it j I 100004 I i. 1 It Jl Il Il A I I 4 a le 16 2v 2q atl 3G 3b qV Data File : >V6422 : : D3 Quant Output File : ^V6422 : : D$ Name : VOA BLANK Misc : INSTR#2 ; 5/22/91 5ML ' Id File : *V8240: :SC Title : EPA Method SW-846 8240 VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Last Calibration : 910523 07: 34 Operator ID: JOANNE Quant Time : 910523 07: 37 Iniected at : 910522 15 : 34 1 1 1 - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - -- - - -- - -- ---- -- --- -- --- - - - -- - c 1 Lc /�u TF ^F nFlnl Y•= i'= V�•�ti � ✓c,�9S� S � 4 9io�.4�a cc-cyG•to r , 9�a<7i2I�Z#f I Q -2 ,cyr;f s�10 `lost:,/ ✓ ,yoG i9vs 91o�3c-7 ?Us.z`LUE— - oriel 1 SD�Gr�—' 7 ✓� cf/ O � 0 7 z .ate S / ao3.s— APPROI)ED BY: V ' 1 r 09T nrT 02T OOT 09 00 0r I 0„P' Iq ins uur'0 j ' I !Ij 1• i i", I 11j j I U5 Ei I _ I j 19R-I jl '' ryucT I J rLT ao ' USW - ' i I I I � I j sP v`. sd i�C SP y5 i•s Sr Or 1 " I � G -J V V L V L 2 f C• V J'i. i. 0 C V r G i l r L _ r � i , �. �� � :7C VD DD G �D GD fL�L U . l•J sL G ; it it _ � � :. , _ . - L•J l�D L . fD JG f l .._ Com_ v V ll .] :, C. L UD C i .,r .- _ .. l:G Ur ,. Z- i. v _ p> �Lz 4V l �u � L Ut., C•z V L ♦ l am J r' l l i �l J t� � , Il G ipC ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 1 SECTION II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ��� PnnW mR"WPn 1 WATER ' METALS MATRIX SPIKEOUPLICATE RESULTS Sample spiked: 91050294 ' Method Method MS Sample Duplicate DC Limits ' Detection Blank % Result Result PARAMETER Limit(ug/L) (ug/L) Rec. (ug/kg) (ug/kg) RPD OA Re Rpm Chromium 20 25 99 5.8 13 82-119 21 ' Sample spiked: 91050310 ' Method Method MS Sample Duplicate OC Limits ' Detection Blank % Result Result PARAMETER Limit(ug/L) (ug/L) Rec. (ug/kg) (ug/kg) RPD % Rec. RPD ' Chromium 20 25 105 8.0 4.0 82-119 21 Not applicable because sample results were below the method detection limit. 1 1 1 1 Toms River Plant C11PLA CIBA-GEIGY Corporation ' P.O.Bax 71 Toms River, New Jersey 08753 Telephone 201 349 5200 ' June 13 , 1991 ' ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Corporate Place 128 , ' 107 Audubon Road Wakefield, MA 01880 ' Attention: Paul Exner Re: Hamblet and Hayes ' Report No. : 91E-0602 Dear Paul: ' Enclosed are the results of analyses performed on samples for the Hamblet and Hayes project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at extension 2386. Sincerely, Kimberly A. Glenn ' Manager, Project Coordination ' KAG:dw Enclosure 1 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEY '. CLIENT NAME: CIBA-GEIGY Corporation Hamblet and Hayes PROJECT NAME: Limited Site Investigation, Phase I Salem, MA PROJECT CODE: HHSALEM CHARGE NUMBER: QF-100,0005 REPORT NUMBER: 91 E-0602 REPORT DATE: 06-Jun-91 John Ri sel Laboratory Director �OD � Fir wRacKWP� HAMBLET AND HAYES LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION, PHASE 1 - REPORT NO. 91E-0602 NNE 13, 1991 �T`� PriroManRKdM Pqr REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' Definitions ND Not detected at or above method detection limit. J Detected but below method detection limit. a' B Analyte detected in blank, reported concentration in sample not corrected for amount in blank. NA Not applicable. N/A Not Available. Method Detection Limit Lowest concentration (amount)that must be present before a reliable and recognizable response is observed for that method of analysis. When a sample has been diluted, the Method Detection Limit has been multiplied by the dilution factor. Methodoloav Volatile organic analyses were performed in accordance with Method 5030 and 8240, SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, 3rd Edition. Chromium analyses were performed in accordance with Methods 3010 and 6010, SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, 3rd Edition. grRw,�P� REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ]ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Laboratory Chronicle ' ETL _ _ Client Designation Date Date g Designation Matrix Sampled Analyzed 91050294 01-MW-HLA-006-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/10/91 91050295 01-MW-ABB-006-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/10/91 J 91050296 01-MW-ABB-004-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 &5/22/91 91050297 01-MW-HLA-003-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 & 5/22/91 91050298 01-MW-ABB-008-01-XX Water 5/06/91 NA 91050299 01-MW-ABB-007-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/10/91 91050300 01-MW-HLA-005-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 &5/21/91 91050301 01-MW-ABB-001-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 & 5/21/91 91050302 01-MW-HLA-004-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 & 5/22/91 91050303 01-MW-HLA-001-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 &5/22/91 91050304 01-MW-ABB-002-01-XX Water 5/06/91 5/20 & 5/22/91 91050305 01-MW-HLA-002-01-XX Water 5106/91 5/20 & 5/22/91 91050306 01-MW-ABB-003-01-XX Water ' 5/06/91 5/22/91 ' 91050307 01-MW-ABB-008-01-XX Water ' 5/06/91 5/21/91 91050308 01-MW-ABB-005-01-XX Water ' 5/06/91 5/21/91 91050309 01-MW-ABB-005-01-DUP Water ' 5/06/91 5/21/91 91050310 01-RB-003-XXX-0I-XX Water . 5/06/91 5/21/91 91050311 Trip Blank Water ' 5/06/91 5/21/& 5/22/91 Note: Volatile organic analyses were not performed on sample 91050298. ��V Pnr .RM w PPM REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 IENVIRONMENTALTESTING:LAOORATORY: Volatiles 9t0503t1 METHOD 91050311 METHOD Trip DETECTION Trip DETECTION PARAMETER Blank LIMIT PARAMETER Blank LIMB Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropens NO 5,1 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene NO 5 f Chloroethane ND 10 Benzene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane ND 5,0 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5.f Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 5,(1 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ' ND - 5.0 1,1-Dichlorosthene ND 5.0 Bromoform NO 5.t 1,1-Dichloroethans ( ND 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 'ND 5t trans-l,2-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 2-Hexanone ND 50 Chloroform ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachioroethene NO 5.1 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene NO S.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND. 5.0 ' Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5,t Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene N0 5.6 Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene rND 5.0 (ugtL) (ug/L) (roti) (u0/L) Surrogates %'Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 i'..106 76-114% Toluene-d8 98 88-110% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 86-115% .r l 1 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Nonconformance Summary The following samples were set up to be analyzed within the fourteen day holding time requirement, but did not run due to instrument malfunction. The samples were then analyzed past the holding time. 91050306: Two days 91050307: One day 91050308: One day 91050309: One day 91050310: One day 91050311: Two days The following samples were analyzed within the fourteen day holding time ' requirement. The surrogate compounds did not meet the acceptance criteria specified under Method SW-846 8240. The samples were reanalyzed past the , holding time. 91050296: Two days 91050297: Two days 91050300: One day 91050301: One day 91050302: Two days 91050303: Two days 91050304: Two days 91050305: Two days ���J PrinW w Rwyy Papp ' w REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050295 METHOD 91050295 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION PARAMETER 006-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 006-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropans Bromomethane '.'ND'. 5.0 NO 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 5.0 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene ND 5.! Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene NO 5.(,Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO 5.0 1 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5.( Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroetharie NO 5.r Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 Bromoform ND S.0 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ' NO 51 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 2-Hexanone NO Ro Chloroform ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ' 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene NO 5.( 2-Butanone ND 100 Toluene ND 5.! 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene NO 5.0 Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene NO 5.( Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene NO 5.0 ,(u91L) (ug/L) (091L) : .. (u9/L) Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108 70-121% Toluene-d8 100 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 74-121% 1 r� PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEW CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY - Volatiles (Continued) 91050294 METHOD 91050294 METH , 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION PARAMETER 006-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 006-01-XX LIMI11 Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 BromomNO 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND Vinyl Chloorideride 14 10 Trichloroethene `ND' Chloroethane ND 10 Benzene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride ND 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane ND Acetone ND 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND - 5.0 2-Chi0roeth I vinyl ether ND 50 1,1-Dichloroethene - ND 1,1-Dlchlor0ethane 5.0 Bromoform NO -9.0 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone '•ND- trans-l,2-Oichloroethene 56 5.0 2-Hexanone ND 50 Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene 7.p 2-Butanons NO 100 Toluene ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO - 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND: - 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND Vinyl acetate 120 50 Styrene ND BromodicMoromethaneNO 5.0 Xylene 'NO 5.0 (u9/L) OWL) (ug/L) (u9fL)� Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 106 70-121% Toluene-c!8 100 81_117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100: 74-121% I' I rc-ly� PAGE 2 �v vel Pnm�Om RM'a�U P�pw ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050297 METHOD 91050297 METHOD ..-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION PARAMETER 003-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 003-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 5 C Bromomethane ND 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene 1.0 J 5.( ' Chloroethane ND 10 Benzene NO 5.( Methylene chloride ND 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO, 5.0 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 5.1: 5.0 ' Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 5.(, 1,1-Dichloroethene NO, 5.0 Bromoform -ND_ 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5( NNOD trans-l,2-Dichloroethens ND 5.0 2-Hexanone Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 5( 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND; 5.0 Tetrachloroethene 53 5.0 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene NO 5.0 7,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5.0 ND 5.0 NO Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene NO 5. 0 5.0 (69/1.) (u9/L) (ugfL) (ug/L) Surrogates %Recovery: OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroathane-d4 104 70-121% Toluene-d8 98 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene -108 74-121% 1 ^ PAGE 5 1 V�Y Pnp .R., ftW REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION j O6-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued 91050296 METHOD 91050296 METH Al-MW-ABB DETECTION O1-MW-ABB DETECT PARAMETER 004-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 004-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 1000 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 500 Bromomethane NO 1000 trans-l,3-Dichlorapropene NO Vinyl chloride NO 1000 Trichloroethene NO Chloroethane NO 1000 Benzene NO 500 Methylene chloride - NO 500 Chlorodibromomethane - NO Acetone NO 10000 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO Carbon disulfide NO 500 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Trichlorofluoromethane NO 500 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 500 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 500 Bromoform NO 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 500 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 51 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 500 2-Hexanone NO, 5000 Chloroform NO 500 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 500 Tetrachloroethene NO 2-Butanone NO 10000 Toluene h500= 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND : 500 Chlorobenzene ` NO 500 Carbon tetrachloride NO 500 Ethylbenzene ND Vinyl acetate NO 5000 Styrene NO Bromodichloromethane NO 500 Xylene NO 500 (ugfL) (ug/L) (ug/L) (u9/L11 Surrogates %Recovery: OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 76-114% Toluene-d8 100 88-110% , 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 86-115% PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050300 METHOD 91050300METHOD 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION PARAMETER 005-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 005-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane ND 10 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Vinyl chloride ND 10 Trichloroethene 15 5.0 Chloroethane ND 10 Benzene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride 4.0 J 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane ND 5,0 Acetone ND 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5,(, Trichlorofluoromethane -ND. 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether -ND . 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.C 1,1-Dichloroethane ` ND 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanons 'ND trans-l,2-Dichioroethene 12 5.0 2-Hexanone ND sC Chloroform ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ' ND50 5,0 . 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene 20 J' 5.0 2-Butanone ND 100 Toluene ND S.L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 ,. Vinyl acetate ND 50 Styrene ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Xylene ND : 5.0 (u9/L) OWL) (ugll) (ug/L) Surrocates %Recovery OC Limits �. 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108: 70-121% Toluene-d8 i 94 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106" 74-121% f may PAGE 7 ' C]�./ PnmlU on RacKlsE F�pN REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' 91050299 METHOD 91050299 METHOIr Ot-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION PARAMETER 007-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 007-01-XX LIMR'E Chloromethane ND - 10 1,2-Dichloropropane - ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND Vinyl chloride ND 10 Trichloroethene ND Chloroethane ; ND 10 Benzene ND Methylene chloride ND 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane " ND- 5.0 Acetone ND 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropane ND Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether - ND 5.0 1,1-Oichloroethene ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 1,1-Oichloroethane ND 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanons ND trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2-Hexanone ND Chloroform ND5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 2-Butanone ND 100 Toluene ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane - ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene - ND- 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND Vinyl acetate ND 50 Styrene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Xylene ND 5.0 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)' Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 .110 70-121% Toluene-d8 98 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene : 100 74-121% PAGE 6 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY' Volatiles (Continued) 91050302 METHOD 91050302 METHOt 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION PARAMETER 004-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 004-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane ND 25 1,2-Dichloropropane ND d Bromomethane ND 25 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 13 Vinyl chloride ND 25 Trichloroethene 37 Chloroethane ND - 25 Benzene NO Methylene chloride ND 13 Chlorodibromomethane NO 13 Acetone ND 250 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO Carbon disulfide ND 13 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Trichlorofluoromethane - ND 13 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND 13 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 13 Bromoform ND 13 1,1-Dichloroethane 74 13 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO i. trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 14 13 2-Hexanone ND 1:_. Chloroform 39 13 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane :ND 13 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 13 Tetrachloroethene 160 2-Butanone 210 J 250 Toluene NO 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 13 Chlorobenzene NO 13 Carbon tetrachloride ND 13 Ethylbenzene ND a ' Vinyl acetate ND 120 Styrene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 13 Xylene ND (u91L) (ug/L) (ug/L). (u91L) ' Surrogates %'Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -110 76-114% Toluene-d8 98 88-110% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108 86-115% I' PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION , 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050301 METHOD 91050301 MET 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTIOf PARAMETER 001-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 001-01-XX LIMI Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane - NO 5.0 Bromomethane NO 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 0 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene 10 0 Chloroethane NO 10 Berizene NO 0 Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO c Acetone 260 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO I0 Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 0 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 Bromoform NO 0 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanons NO 0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.0 J 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 0 Chloroform 2.0 J 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 0 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 0 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene ND o 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 16: 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO - 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethytbenzene NO Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene NO 0 Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xytene sND 5.0 (ug/L) (ug L) (ug/L); (ug/l. Surrogates o/a Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 102 76-114% Toluene-d8 94 88-110% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 86-115% T� PAGE 8 OD ftn p,Re wPp ' ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 JENVIRCINMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050304 METHOD 91050304 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION ' PARAMETER 002-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 002-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane ND 5000 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 2500 Bromomethane NO 5000 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO 2500 Vinyl chloride NO 5000 Trichloroethene 26000 " 2500 Chloroethane ND 5000 Benzene ND 2500 Methylene chloride 8100 2500 Chlorodibromomethane .ND 2500 Acetone NO 50000 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 2500 Carbon disulfide NO 2500 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 2500 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 2500 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 2500 1 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 2500 Bromoform :`ND- 2500 trans-chloroethane,2-Dicloro NO 2500 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND. 25000 trans-l,2-Diehloroethene 1800 J 2500 2-Hexanone 'ND 25000 Chloroform ND 2500 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2500 1,2-Dinone ethane NO 2500 Tetrachloroethene 17000 2500 1,1,1- none ND 50000 Toluene 11000 .I 2500 Carbon 82000 2500 Chlorobenzene ND 2500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 2500 Ethylbenzene 3700 2500 Vinyl acetate NO 25000 Styrene NO 2500 Bromodlchloromethane NO 2500 Xylene 2J000 P500 (ug/L) (ug/L) OWL) OWL) Surrogates %'Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 h. . 102 - _ 70-121% ' Toluene-d8 _ 100 - 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 74-121% l 1 PAGE 11 ' _ �� PnMM on R�M�OPWn REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION O6-Jun-91 ENV]RONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050303 METHOD 91050303 MET H 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTIO1 PARAMETER 001-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 001-01-XX LIMM Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Bromomethane - NO 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO C Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene ND C ,. Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene - NO 5.0 Methylene chloride ND 5.0 Chlorodibromomelhane NO C Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO C Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND S.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND .. 5.0 Bromoform NO �C 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO , C trans-l,2-Dichloroethens - ND 5.0 2-Hexanone ND' SC Chloroform ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Ic C 1,2-Dichloroethane ND5.0 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 . C 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene NO 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND ,C 50 Strene Vinyl acetate ND yNO C Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene ND 5.0 N9iL) (u9/L) (u92) (u9/ Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108 70-121% Toluene-d8 98 81-117% , 4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 74-121% t t PAGE 10 ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION O6-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' Volatiles (Continued) . 91050306 METHOD 91050306 METHOD o1-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION ' PARAMETER 003-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 003-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane ND 50 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 25 Bromomethane ND 50 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND 2E ' Vinyl chloride ND- 50 Trichloroethene 70 2. Chloroethane NO` 56 Benzene ND 25 Methylene chloride 32 25 Chlorodibromomethane ND 25 Acetone ND - 500 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 25 Carbon disulfide NO 25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2'_ Trichlorofluoromethane NO 25 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 25 1,1-Dichloroethene NO : 25 Bromoform -- NO 25 ' 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 25 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 25C trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 58 25 2-Hexanone ND 250 Chloroform ` ND- 25 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane `ND 2S 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 25 Tetrachloroethene 70 .` 2: 2-Butanone NO 500 Toluene 20 J 25 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 93 25 Chlorobenzene NO, 25 ' Carbon tetrachloride 11 J 25 Ethylbenzene NO 25 Vinyl acetate ND 250 Styrene ND 25 Bromodichloromethane NO 25 Xylene ND 25 WL) (up/L) '-(utvL) (u91L) Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 >97 70-121% ' Toluene-dB 102 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 74-121% r A PAGE 13 ��V FruRecloW P� REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' r 91050305 METHOD 91050305 METHO 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTQN PARAMETER 002-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 002-01-XX LIM17M Chloromethane ND 10 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 5.0 Bromomethane ND 10 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene 10 Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, NO Trichlorofluoromethane )- NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 Bromoform NO 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO It trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 50 Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene 2.0 J 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 17' S.0 Chlorobenzene ' ND- - 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO 5.0 Ethylbenzene NO Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene NO Bromodichloromethane - ND5.0 Xylene NO -- 5.0 (ug/L) (u9/L) (u9/L) (u9/L)� Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 104 70-121% Toluene-d8 102.- 81-117% , 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10274-121% i r 1 1 1 PAGE 12 r�]Q R111W MRMCM Peer REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-)un-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' 91050308 METHOD 91050308 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION ' 005-Ot-XXLIMIT PARAMETER 005-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane ND 100 1,2-Dlchloropropane NO 50 BromomNO 100 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO: .' 50 Vinyl chloride ND 100 Trichloroethene 88p. 50 Chloroethane NO 100 Benzene "ND - 50 Methylene chloride ND 50 Chlorodibromomethane NO 50 Acetone NO 1000 cis-1,3-Dichioropropene ND 50 Carbontlisulfide ND 50 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 50 Trichlorofluoromethane - NO 50 NO vinyl ether NO 50 ' 1,1-Dichloroethens NO 50 Bromoform NO 50 trans- NO So 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 500 Chlor form chloroethane 40 S0 2-Hexanone NO 500 Chloroform NO 50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 50 ' 1,2-Oichloroethane NO 5o Tetrachloroethene 67 50 2-Butanone NO 1000 Toluene 18 J 50 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 420 50 Chlorobenzene NO 50 ' Carbon tetrachloride ND 50 Ethylbenzene ND 50 Vinyl acetate NO 500 Styrene 50 Bromodichloromethane NO 5o Xylene NNO 50 (u9fL) (u9fL) (u9/L) (ug/L) Surrotlates % ReCOyery OC Limits 1,2-Dichlorcethane-d4 106 70-121% ' Toluene-d8 - 96 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 74-121% PAGE 15 ��(� Pnrhp pn R..'f Pa REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) ' 91050307 METHOD 91050307 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTI PARAMETER 008-OI-XX: . LIMIT PARAMETER 008-01-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane NO Bromomethans NO 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5. Vinyl chloride 23 10 Trichloroethene 92 5. Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene 3.0 J 5.0 Methylene chloride 56 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO S. Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5. Carbon disulfide 25:: 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO S. 1,1-Dichloroethene 10 5.0 Bromoform NO 5. 1,1-Dichloroethane 49 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 5o trans-1,2-Dichloroethene .61 5.0 2-Hexanone ND-, 50 Chloroform 3.0 JI 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 5. 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 Tetrachloroethane 60 S. 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene 20 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 140 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5. Carbon tetrachloride NO, 5.0 Ethylbenzene . 1.0 J 5. Vinyl acetate NO 50 Styrene NO 5.� Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene 4.0.J: 5.0 (ug/L) (NIYL) (u9/L) (ug/L) Surrogates % Recovery, OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 .112 70-121% , Toluene-d8 96 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 74-121% f PAGE 14 gra PrmpUanRepRlepPaper � REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-)un-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Volatiles (Continued) 91050310 METHOD 91050310 METHOD 01-RB-003- DETECTION 01-RB-003- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT Chloromethane NO 10 1,2-Dichloropropane NO 5.0 Bromomethane NO 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5.0 Vinyl chloride NO 10 Trichloroethene NO 5.0 Chloroethane NO 10 Benzene NO 5.0 Methylene chloride NO 5.0 Chlorodibromomethane NO 5.0 Acetone NO 100 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO 5.0 Carbon disulfide NO 5.0 1,7,2-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane NO - 5.0 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO .5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 Bromoform NO 5.0 1,1-Oichloroethane NO 5.0 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO 50 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene NO 5.0 2-Hexanone NO 50 Chloroform NO 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane NO 5.0 Tetrachloroethene NO 5.0 2-Butanone NO 100 Toluene NO 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 5.0 Chlorobenzene NO 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride NO ; 5.0. Ethylbenzene NO 5.0 Vinylacetate y NO 50 Styrene NO 5.0 Bromodichloromethane NO 5.0 Xylene NO 5.0 (uglL) (u9/L) OWL) (ug/L) Surrogates %Recovery : OC Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 112 70-121% Toluene-d8 96 81-117% ' 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 74-121% i L 1 t i 1 ' PAGE 17 n 9 �]�J PnnW on q�w Papw REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CUBA-GE(G i CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY' Volatiles (Continued) ' 91050309 METHOD 91050309 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTit� PARAMETER 005-01-DUP'- LIMIT PARAMETER 005-01-DUP LIMIT Chloromethane NO 100 1,2-Dichloropropane NO Bromomethane NO 100 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene NO Vinyl chloride NO 100 Trichloroethene >:-,. 660, Chloroethane NO 100 Benzene NO 50 Methylene chloride ND 50 Chlorodibromomethane NO Acetone NO. 1000 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO Carbon disulfideND 50 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 50 Trichlorofluoromethane NO 50 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NO 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 50 Bromoform ND 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 50 4-Methyl-2-pentanons NO 50 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 35 Jso 2-Hexanone NO 500 Chloroform NO 50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 2-eutanone 50 Tetrachloroethane 58 ly D 1000 Toluene t5 J' so 1,7,1-Trichloroethane 400 50 Chlorobenzene NO 50 Carbon tetrachloride NO 50 Ethylbenzene NO 5 Vinyl acetate ND 500 Styrene NO 5 Bromodichloromethane NO 50 Xylene NO. 50 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L):...::g!L u 9/L) i Surrogates % RecoveryOC Limits , 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108 70-121% , Toluene-d8 i98 81-117% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 74-121% 1 ��(� PAGE 16 (7 PnnMWROLaw P+m ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06—Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Metals ' 91050294 METHOD 91050295 METHOD 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION PARAMETER 006-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER 006-01-XX LIMIT ' Chromium 8.9 J 20 Chromium 14 J 20 Ng/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)14 t ' 91050296 METHOD 91050297 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-HLA- DETECTION PARAMETER 004-01 XX, LIMIT PARAMETER 003-01-XX LIMIT ' Chromium 8.0 J 20 Chromium 5100 200 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) 91050298 METHOD 91050299 METHOD 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION PARAMETER 008-01-X0( LIMIT PARAMETER 007-01-XX LIMIT ' Chromium 5100 200 Chromium 17 J 20 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) 91050300 METHOD 91050308 METHOD 01-MW-HLA DETECTION 01-MW-ABB- DETECTION ' PARAMETER 005-01-X0( LIMIT PARAMETER 005-01-XX LIMIT Chromium 6.8'J 20 Chromium 66 20 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) ' 910503099 METHOD 91050310 METHOD 01-MW-ABB DETECTION 01-RB-003- DETECTION PARAMETER 005-01-DUP LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT ' Chromium 62 20 Chromium 6.0 J 20 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) 1 PAGE 18 1 ;73 Pnn,W o„Rx w Pepe. NJ CERTIFIED LAB M 15265 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING I,l380RATORY C I BA-G E I G Y 'ROUTq,37 W ' NC CERTIFIED LAB r -297 ` TOMS RIVER,NJ 08754 AL CERTIFIED LAB r 40490 r (908)349-5200 of (S00)982-8933 . OTHER CERTIFICATION: FAX(908)W9195 PAQE 1 �fY SHADED AREA + +a F FOR ETI.USE ONLY SAMPLING INFORMATION - - ;- li. PROJECTC E: CONTAINER TYPE. SIZE I PRESERVATIVE -s; A 191-SAI�f Sam b : SI nature: ij rw ka( Plant Slte:HAMM i WITSS BAIL( : _ DUE DATE '.: (o o Com an : A191 NNVIR(MEWAL Dlvlebn: (. ( Area/ - _ INVOICE TO I " a pp . Phone Ext: I Char r: or-lQggM N ' SAMPLENO. DATE TIME MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST/COMMENTS BOTTLES ) .r /O .b 40 w OI-MW-A85-OOZ--or- . .w - ! , y/USU ?GlS' 144 u � 1430 -fAw - A1; - DD - r' aC 91,0,5' 03o o - -AB - • ol -x n �! 9/0ScJ30q sc -o °1 - x r{ Cr 9�oSa 3�9 s� MW- - O -OI-D14 'Y + r 38 3 �. /� ��5i biz 1� C,• t' CUSTODY SEAL INTACT? N'WA RELINWISHED BY:SI ( 9nalural DATE TIME RECBVED FOR trB017AT0f1Y BY:(Sl9nuury'' DATE; TIME ! N SAMPLER COLD? '9N WA .( S V 1 Y� -0, /ooa 9AMRE8 PRE9EAVEDT N WA RECEIVED BV:(SIOnalure) REMARKS: HEADSPACE W VOA'97 V O WA 1 = , `;• 1 VOA TEFLON SIDE DOV/N7 tVII WA RELINWISHED W(Signature) I. COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY:(Sipnalwe) (A. , c ME , p' j .404f 1. 7� 1: 1. I L Q y CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Jr CIBA-GEIGY NJ CERTIFIED UB 015265 TOMS RIVER,NJ 08754 ROUTE 37 W NC CERTIFIED LAB Y 297 { = AL CERTIFIED LAB a 10490 (908)349-6200 01 (800)962-6933 OTHER CERTIFICATION: FAX(908)505-9195 PAGE OF _� r i SHADED AREA INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT I FOR ETL USE ONLY SAMPLING INFORMATION .i PROJECT CODE: CONTAINER TYPE, SIZE I PRESERVATIVE ) III-SAIAM Sem ed by: Signature: DUE DATE .(trt�y►1`. Plant Silo:114119111,111T L WIYtS, SUM : q 31i[S5� Title: o Company: AGH L1NIR(M8fY1R'Al, DlNslon: BI I60.T0: Phone/: Lid-6 Ext: Charge Y: F lo00003 YYY O` yyFF t it OF SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST I COMMENTS BOTTLES i 5� T���91 p GLJ 0t- aw- HLA-oo -oI - (02.4 (TC-0-t Cr �onLl T5 u29f ol-Mw-A6e,-oob- ol -x , 4 ( i C, 2'9G o10 ol-MIJ-ANg-oo4 •c)i -*x It 3 1 950 G'•?9 741050 01-Mw • ALP,- DO -ol - ✓ 1 3 �1i0 U P 40 1•MvJ -Aft-oo - bl -K Cr TOT& � .. �. i U7 11004- OF MW -A&15-003 - ol -x (o2'4(TL-L)4 r M]n` 4, ?,�� .`n- WUSO 3,0U s5 I -N . NLA - to OI - MW-ABB- Dol -ol - A ( 11 y 9va5-030 - -0of K . ; '- 61 - 7) /uSo3o3 Mw- NLA- oDl - al -x CUSTODY SEAL INTACR : NWA REUNWISHED BY:(Sipnalure) DAT TIME RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(Slenalure) DATE: TIME: SAMPLES COLD? :, ON WA St. 45' '•...�f S�/9/ /000 � �'" &WPLESPREWMW? ",ON WA RECEIVED BY:(Signalure) REMARKS: � l HEADSPACEINVOA'87 • :,��y:. Tl WA t - VOATEFLON SIDE DOWN S•' WA' RELINWISHED Bv:(Slpnalurel - L Z i COMMENTS: rV Jfi RECEIVED BY:(Sienalure) i I ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data ' Section I: Organics ' Section II: Metals and Traditional Parameters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Primee w fiegtleo Paper Y ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-0602 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 06-Jun-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' SECTION I -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T vnMW on Re W Gaper GC/MS PERFORMANCE STANDARD Bromofluorobenzene (BF8) ' % Relative Abundance Ion Abundance Base Appropriate -m-z Criteria Peak Peak Status -- ----------------- _ __ ------- 50 ----------------- ---------- ----- 50 15-40% of mass 95 23 . 44 23 . 44 Ok 75 30-60!6 of mass 95 55 . 07 55 . 07 Ok 95 Base peak , 100% relative abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Ok ' 96 5-9% of mass 95 7. 98 7. 98 Ok 173 Less than 2% of mass 174 0 . 00 0 . 00 Ok 174 Greater than 50% of mass 95 90 . 15 90 . 15 Ok 175 5-9% of mass 174 7. 05 7. 81 Ok ' 176 95-101% of mass 174 80 . 72 99 - 52 Ok 177 5-9% of mass 176 6 . 11 6 . 81 Ok Injection Date : 05/10/91 Injection Time : 07 : 57 Data File : >A0370 ' Scan : 53 SAMPLE ID DATA FILE DATE OF ANALYSIS TIME OF ANALYSIS �S�ucSC >Ayni 51c1y' e43S ✓ �ca3 ar�C >AG317L C�Isq Co5c4�3 7 A031 uaa ' •/ qo5t>44• 7AC 314- 13?4 ✓ gicF>cXlr, 7ac3�5 _✓ q Jbcxllj 7A0376 13b 403 ✓ 9046c14} >AGBT7' __ 1459✓ ASC�c141 >Ac-3,13y5r,1 ✓ g I Cc 4g IAS >Acs A 043 ✓ cl ;c kA MSD >1w 330 1734 Clic4C14¢ >Ao-3 7L Igli APPROVED BY: 3611UA LLILLI/1�1 1 WATER ' VOLATILE MATRIX SPIIEJMATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY ' Matrix Spike- Sample No.: 91050302 MS/MSO Spike Sample Conc. Conc. OC Limits Added Result MS % MSD % PARAMETER (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) Rec. (ug/L) Rec. RPD RPD % Rec. 1,1-Dichloroethene 50 NO 44 88 47 94 7 14 67-ta5 Trichloroethene 50 15 61 92 63 96 4 14 77_120 Benzene 50 NO 46 92 47 94 2 11 76_127 Toluene 50 NO 46 92 48 96 4 13 76-125 Chlorobenzene 50 NO 46 92 46 92 0 13 75-130 ' �v v�./ Pnm�C on R�rypM Rep�r ' ' Envirormental Technology Center - C18A•GEI GY Corporation CIBAGEIGY 1 P.O. Box 18300 410 Swing Road Greensboro, North Carolina 27419 Telephone 919 632 6000 1 Fax 919 632 2048 ABB Environmental Services, Inc. August 8, 1991 Southern New .England Division 1 Corporate Place 128 107 Audubon Road Wakefield, Massachusetts 01880 1 Attention: Paul J. Exner, P.E. Dear Paul: 1 -Below you will find the analytical results for two green water samples which were 1 submitted to Corporate Environmental Technology Analytical Chemistry to isolate and identify this green coloration. This green material was not retained by solid phase extraction, indicating an 1 inorganic species. Total chromium analyses were performed on digested samples, utilizing flame atomic absorption. 1 Sample Description Date Concentration 01-MW-HLA-002-02-XXX 8/1 230 PPM ' 01-14W-ABB-003-02-XXX 8/1 1,700 PPM Pleasenate that the calor observed was directly proportional to the chromium concentration; moreover, the color was nearly identical to our Cr3* standard. In our original communication, it was agreed to speciate the chromium b valence 1 Y state; however, the samples were not amenable to the Cr6' colorimetric teat due to interference from the green matrix. 1 Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Duff Collins on 8/7, it was agreed not to perform valence speciation by ion chromatography due to the fairly large set- up cost which would be incurred. 1 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (919) 632-7297. 1 Yours truly, Tom Barber Group Leader ' Analytical Chemistry cc: B. Steelman 1 1 1 Envirormental Technology Center V l _I R A— EI C1BA-GE1GY Corporation _ Vr\ V v�/ r P.O. Box 18300 ' 410 Swing Road Greensboro, North Carolina 27419 Telephone 919 632 6000 Fax 919 632 2048 ' ABB Environmental Services, Inc. August 8, 1991 Southern New England Division Corporate Place 128 107 Audubon Road Wakefield, Massachusetts 01880 Attention: Paul J. Exner, P.E. Dear Paul: 1 Below you will find the analytical results for two green water samples which were submitted to Corporate Environmental Technology Analytical Chemistry to isolate ' and identify this green coloration. This green material was not retained by solid phase extraction, indicating an inorganic species. Total chromium analyses were performed on digested samples, utilizing flame atomic absorption. Sample Description Date Concentration , 01-MW-HLA-002-02-XXX 8/1 230 PPM 01-HW-ABB-003-02-XXX 8/1 1,700 PPH ' Please note that the color observed was directly proportional to the chromium concentration; moreover, the color was nearly identical to our Cr3` standard. , In our original communication, it was agreed to speciate the chromium by valence state; however, the samples were not amenable to the Cr6' colorimetric test due to interference from the green matrix. Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Duff Collins on 8/7, it was agreed not ' to perform valence speciation by ion chromatography due to the fairly large set- up cost which would be incurred. ' If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (919) 632-7297. Yours truly, ' Tom Barber Group Leader Analytical Chemistry ' cc: B. Steelman 1 California Anaivrical Laboratory 1 Zt 1 Enseco 1 A CORNING Company 1 October 11, 1991 Lab ID: 060285 Diana Baldi 1 CIBA-GEIGY Corporation 410 Swing Road Greensboro, NC 27409 1 Dear Ms. Baldi : Enclosed is the report for the one aqueous and two sediment samples 1 for your Project #06440-03 (ABB-ES) which were received at Enseco-Cal Lab on 5 September 1991. 1 The report consists of the following sections: I Sample Description 1 II Analysis Request III Quality Control Report IV Analysis Results 1 The percent recoveries for OCOF, HpCDD and OCOD in the matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate are unusually high due to the non-homogeneity of the sample matrix. Due to high levels of the above compounds, the 1 spike levels are inappropriate and percent recoveries were not calculated. If you have any questions, please feel free to call . 1 Sincerely, Shelly Eyraud 1 Manager of Low Resolution Dioxin Services 1 mbw cc: Maureen Dooley - ABB Environmental Services, Inc. 1 Enseco Incorporated 2544 Induscrial Boulevard 1 West Sacramento,California 95691 916/372-1393 Fax: 916/372.7768 1JEnseco I Sample Description "`O"'"SC.P1 See the attached Sample Description Information. The samples were received under chain-of-custody. ' II Analysis Request , The following analytical test was requested. ' Lab ID Analysis Description 060285-1 through 3 Polychlorinated Dioxins/Furans Isomer Specific III Ouality Control ' A. Pro.iect Specific OC As requested, QC matrix spikes were performed using your samples. Results are on the attached Quality ' Control Summary Report. B. MethodBlank Results. A method blank is a laboratory-generated sample which assesses the degree to which laboratory operations , and procedures cause false-positive analytical results for your samples. No target parameters were detected in the method blanks associated , with your samples at the reporting limit levels noted on the attached Method Blank Report. C. Laboratory Control Samples - The LCS Program ' Duplicate Control Samples A DCS is a well-characterized matrix ' (blank water, sand or celite) which is spiked with certain target parameters and analyzed at approximately 10% of the sample load in order to establish method-specific control limits. The DCS results associated with your samples are on the attached Duplicate Control Sample Report. Accuracy is measured by Percent Recovery as in: ' % recovery - (measured concentration) x 100 (actual concentration) ' Precision is measured using duplicate tests by Relative Percent Difference (RPD) as in: RPD - (% recovery test 1 - % recovery test 2) x 100 (% recovery test 1 + % recovery test 2)/2 Control limits for accuracy ' historical recovery (Percent recovery) are based on the average, for precisions(relative percen3standard e tdifference) rangeounits. limits from0 (identical duplicate DCS results) to the average, historical relative percent difference + 3 standard deviation units. In cases where there is not enough historical data, EPA limits or advisory limits are set, with the approval of the Quality Assurance department. IV Analysis Results Test methods may include minor modifications of published EPA Methods such as reporting limits or parameter lists. Reporting limits are adjusted to reflect dilution of the sample, when appropriate. Solid and waste samples are reported on an "as received" basis; i .e., no correction is made for moisture content, unless the method requires or the client requests that such correction be made. Results are on the attached data sheets. - �J-aseco ACa jC=W SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION for ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Sampled Received ' Lab ID Client ID Matrix Date Time Date 060285-0001-SA O1-SO-001-XXX-OI-XX SOIL 04 SEP 91 13:30 05 SEP 91 060285-0001-MB Method Blank SOIL 05 SEP 91 00285-0002-SA 01-SD-00I-Xxx-oI-XD SOIL 04 SEP 91 13:30 05 SEP 91 060285-0002-MS 01-SO-001-XXX-OI-XD SOIL 04 SEP 91 13:30 05 SEP 91 060285-0002-SD O1-SD-001-XXX-OI-XD SOIL 04 SEP 91 13:30 05 SEP 91 060285-0003-SA O1-FB-001-XXX-02-XX AQUEOUS 04 SEP 91 15:00 05 SEP 91 060285-0003-MB Method Blank AQUEOUS 05 SEP 91 ' 1 . - A CamN6 Campuy QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT Special Services - Low Resolution Mass Spectrometry ' Laboratory Sample Number QC Matrix QC Lot Number (S Run Number ' QC Category (DCS (SCS/BLANK) 060285-0001-SA SOLID DXNFUR-S 26 AUG 91-A 060285-0001-MB SOLID DXNFUR-S 26 AUG 91-A 060285-0002-SA SOLID DXNFUR-S 26 AUG 91-A 060285-0002-MS SOLID DXNFUR-S 26 AUG 91-A - 060285-0002-SD SOLID DXNFUR-S 26 AUG 91-A 060285-0003-SA AQUEOUS DXNFUR-A 28 AUG 91-A ' 060285-0003-MB AQUEOUS DXNFUR-A 28 AUG 91-A - 1 1 A C-g C_W y DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT , Special Services - Low Resolution Mass Spectrometry Concentration Accuracy Precis>� Analyte Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD) OCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Lirq�� Category: DXNFUR-S Matrix: SOLID QC Lot: 26 AUG 91-A ' Concentration Units: ng 2,3,1,8-TCDF 10 6.90 5.90 6.40 64 60-140 16 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 10 7.20 6.40 6.80 68 60-140 12 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 10 7.00 6.20 6.60 66 60-140 12 0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 10 7.40 5.80 6.60 66 60-140 24 Rn OCDF 50 45.0 32.0 38.5 77 60-140 34 2,3,1,8-TCDD 10 7.70 6.70 7.20 72 60-140 14 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 10 9.20 7.80 8.50 85 60-140 16 50 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 10 6.90 6.00 6.45 65 60-140 14 °^ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOD 10 6.70 5.60 6.15 62 60-140 18 OCDO 50 36.0 26.0 31 .0 62 60-140 32 Category: DXNFUR-A ' Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 28 AUG 91-A Concentration Units: ng 2,3,7;8-TLDF 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 60-140 0.0 50 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 10 10.0 10.0 10.0 100 60-140 0.0 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 10 11 .0 11.0 11.0 110 60-140 0.0 1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 10 11.0 11.0 11 .0 110 60-140 0.0 OCOF 50 75.0 79.0 77.0 154 60-140 5.2 50 2,3,7,8-TCDD 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 60-140 0.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 10 11 .0 11.0 11 .0 110 60-140 0.0 5■� 1 ,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 10 10.0 10.0 10.0 100 60-140 0.0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDO 10 11 .0 11 .0 • 11 .0 110 60-140 0.0 50 OCDD 50 56.0 57.0 56.5 113 60-140 1.8 , Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results, sw&L';eco ' POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS AC-"6`.W, ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS L0W RESOLUTION ' Client Name: ABS Environmental Services, Inc. Client ID: Method Blank Lab I0: 060285-0001-M8 ' Matrix: SOIL Sampled: NA Received: NA Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 ' Sample Amount 10.0 G Percent Moisture NA Parameter Detection Data Result Units Limit Qualifiers Furans TCOFs (total) 2,3,7,8-TCDF NO ng/g 0.038 NO ng/g 0.038 PeCDFs (total ) NO ng/g 0.0095 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF NO ng/9 0.0095 ' 2,3,4,1,8-PeCDF NO ng/9 0.0095 HxCDFs (total ) ND ng/g 0..026 1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCOF NO ng/g 0.026 1,2,3,6,1,8-HxCDF ND ng/9 0.026 ' 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/g 0.026 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF NDHpCDFn9/9 0.026 1,2,3 {total ) NO ng/g 0.025 0.025 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ' 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF NNO ng/g O n9/9 0.165 OCDF Dioxins TCDDs (total ) NO ng/g 0.010 2,3,7-,8-TCDD NO n9/9 0.010 PeCDDs (total ) NO ng/g 0.043 1,2,3;7,8-PeCOD NO ng/g 0.043 HxCOOs (total ) NO ng/g 0.045 1,2,3,4,1,8-HxCDD NO ng/g 0.045 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD NO ng/g 0.045 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD NO ng/g 0.045 HpCDDs (total ) NO ng/g 0.023 ' 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ng/g 0.023 OCDD NO ng/g 0. 10 NO - Not detected (continued on following page) NA = Not applicable Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. ' Rev 230187 rEnseco 1 POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS A Cm SC. ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS (CONT. ) LOW RESOLUTION Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. , Client ID: Method Blank Lab ID: 060285-0001-MB Matrix: SOIL Sampled: NA Received: NA Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP p 91 Analyzed: 23 y SEP 91 ' Sample Amount 10.0 G Percent Moisture NA ' % Recovery 13C-2,3,7,8-TCOF ' 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 62 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 78 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCOD 79 ' 13C-1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDO 79 13C-OCDD 62 1 ND - Not detected ' NA = Not applicable Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. Rev 230787 �JEseco ' POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS AC""'"gCmpwy ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS LOW RESOLUTION ' Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Client I0: 01-SD-001-XXX-0I-XX Lab ID: 060285-0001-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 ' Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 11 .1 G Percent Moisture NA ' Parameter Detection Data Result Units Limit Qualifiers ' Furans TCDFs (total ) ' 2,3,7,8-TCOF NO ng/g 0.034 PeCDFs (total ) NO ng/g 0.034 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF NO ng/g 0.030 NO n 0.030 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF NO ng/g 0.030 ' HxCOFs (total) 1 .2 ng/g -- 1 ,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.35 ng/g 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/g 0. 11 ' 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/g 0.11 1 ,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF N5.0 �g/g 0.11 HpCOFs (total ) __ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1 . 1 ng%g 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF NO ng/g n9/9 _0.080 OCDF Dioxins ' TCDDs (total ) 2,3, 7,8-TCDD NO ng/g 0.055 PeCDDs (total ))O NO ng/g 0.055 ' 1,2,3,7,8-Pe8NO n9/9 0.098 HxCDDs (total ) N� 5 ng/9 0.098 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD g/9 -- 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD x'0.45 ng/9 0.078 ' 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 9/9 -- HpCDDs (total) ND n9/9 0.12 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDO 7.5 n OCDD 120 ng/g ' NO = Not detected (continued on following page) NA = Not applicable Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. Rev 230787 Enseco POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS AC "%C. ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS (CONT. ) LOW RESOLUTION Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. ' Client ID: 01-SD-001-XXX-0I-XX Lab ID: 060285-0001-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 , Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 11 . 1 G Percent Moisture NA ' % Recovery 13C-2,3,7,8-TCOF 43 ' 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 50 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 62 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 70 ' 13C-1,2,3,4,6,1,8-HpCDD 83 13C-OCDD 73 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable , Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. , Rev 230787 sec AC�gC POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS �JEno Y ' ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS LOW RESOLUTION ' Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Client ID: O1-SD-001-XXX-0I-XD Lab ID: 060285-0002-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 ' Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 10.4 G ' Percent Moisture NA Parameter Detection Data Result Units Limit Qualifiers ' Furans TCDFs (total) NO ng/g 0.012 ' 2,3,7,8-TCOF ND PeCDFs (total ) NO ng/g 0.010.012 0 1,2,3,1,8-PeCDF ND n9/9 0.010 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF' N9/9 0.010 0.33 nHxCOFs (total ) g/g -- 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ng/g 0.034 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/g 0.034 ' 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ng/g 0.034 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF N0.85 n9 /9 0.034 HpCOFs (total ) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.20 ng/g- - 1,2,3,4,1,8,9-HpCDF N0.89 n90.028 OCDF 9/g - Dioxins ' TCDOs (total ) ND ng/g 0.019 2,3,7,8-TCDD NO ng/g 0.019 PeCDDs (total ) ND 1,2;3,7,8-PeCOD ND ng%g 0 .040 HxCDDs (total) 0.40 n 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD NO ng/g 0.033 ' 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0. 12 ng/g -- 12,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 4 ng/g 0.058 HpCODs (total) -- 1 _ 1,2,3,4,6,7;8-HpCDD 11 .2 ng�g ' OCDD ND = Not detected (continued on following page) NA = Not applicable ' Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. Rev 230787 �J,Enseca POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS AC 6SC= y ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS (CONT. ) , LOW RESOLUTION Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. ' Client ID: O1-SD-001-XXX-OI-XD Lab ID: 060285-0002-SA Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 ' Sample Amount 10.4 G Percent Moisture NA % Recovery 13C-2,3,7,8-TCOF 37 ' 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 39 13C-1,2,3,1,8-PeCDO 46 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 51 13C-1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HPCDD 64 , 13C-OCDD 73 1 ND - Not detected NA = Not applicable pp ble Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud ' The cover letter is an integral part of this report. ' Rev 230787 - A Ganong CanpHv ' POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Client ID: 01-SD-001-XXX-0I-XD Matrix Spike ' Lab ID: 060285-0002-MS Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 ' Column Type : DB-5 Sample Amount: 10.2 G ' Found in ng Foundgin % Parameters Sample Spiked MS Sample Recovery ' Furans 2,3,1,8-TCDF NO 10 9.0 90 ' 1 ,2,3,1,8-PeCDF ND 10 7.0 70 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 10 8.7 87 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2.1 10 12 99 ' OCDF 9.3 50 86 NA Dioxins ' 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 10 9.5 95 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD NO 10 9.6 96 1,2,3,4,1,8-HxCDD 1.2 10 10 88 ' 1,2,3,4,6,1,8-HpCDD 12 10 37 NA OCDD 125 50 450 NA % Recovery ' 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 49 13C-2,317,8-TCDD 59 ' 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 82 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDO 97 13C-1,2,3,4,6,718-HpCDD 125 13C-OCOD 104 ND-Not Detected ' NA-Not Applicable Reported by: Robert Hrabak Approved by: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. Version 070187 ✓EASE o POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS A Caning CwnW QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. , Client ID: 01=SD-001-XXX-OI-XD Spike Duplicate ' Lab ID: 060285-0002-SD Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: OS SEP 91 Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Column Type : DB-5 ' Sample Amount: 10.5 G ng Found 9 in ng Found in % ' Parameters Sample Spiked MS Sample Recovery Furans , 2,3,7,8-TCDF NO 10 12 120 , 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF ND 10 8.7 87 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF NO 10 11 110 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-H CDF P 2.1 10 11 149 OCDF 9.3 50 110 NA Dioxins ' 2,3,7,8-TCDD NO 10 12 120 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD NO 10 12 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 120 1.2 10 14 128 ' 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 12 10 55 NA OCDD 125 50 650 NA % Recovery ' 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 52 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 63 ' 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 81 13C-112131407,8-HxCDD 93 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 117 13C-OCDD 100 ' NO-Not Detected t NA=Not Applicable Reported by: Robert Hrabak Approved by: Shelly Eyraud ' The cover letter is an integral part of this report. . Version 070187 ' POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS L6 , ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS LOW RESOLUTION Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Client ID: Method Blank Lab I0: 060285-0003-MB ' Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: NA Received: NA Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 1 .00 L Column Type DB-5 Parameter Detection Data Result Units Limit Qualifiers ' Furans TCDFs (total ) NO ng/L 0.061 ' 2,3,7,8-TCDF NO ng/L 0.061 PeCDFs (total ) ND ng/L 0.051 1 ,2,3,1,8-PeCDF NO ng/L 0.051 ' 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ng/L 0.051 HxCOFs (total ) NO ng/L 0.11 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.11 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.11 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.11 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.11 HpCOFs (total ) ND ng/L 0.11 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF NO n L 0.11 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ng/L 0.11 OCDF NO ng/L 0.56 ' Dioxins TCODs (total ) NO ng/L 0.091 2,3,7,8-TCDD NO ng/L 0.091 PeCODs (total ) NO ng/L 0.20 1 ,2,3,7,8-PeCDD NO ng/L 0.20 HxCODs (total) NO n9/L 0.15 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD L 0.15 1 ,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD NO ng/L 0. 15 ' 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ng/L 0.15 HpCODs (total) NO ng/L 0.078 ' 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND OCDD n L 0.078 NO ng/L 0.24 ' NO - Not detected (continued on following page) NA - Not applicable Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part-of this report. ' Rev 230187 "-Enseco POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS AC " gC0Opj ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS (CONT. ) LOW RESOLUTION Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. ' Client ID: Method Blank Lab ID: 060285-0003-MB Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: NA Received: NA Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 1 .00 L Column Type DB-5 ' % Recovery 13C-2,3,7,8-TCOF 89 ' 13C-2,3,1,8-TCDD 86 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 98 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 102 ' 13C-1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 123 13C-OCDD 142 ND = Not detected NA = Not applicable , Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. ' Rev 230787 ^�Eriseco POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS AC�'CmWy ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS LOW RESOLUTION ' Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Client ID: 01-FB-001-XXX-02-XX Lab ID: 060285-0003-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 0.998 L Column Type DB-5 Parameter Detection Data Result Units Limit Qualifiers Furans TCDFs (total ) NO -ng/L 0.19 2,3,7,8-TCDF NO ng/L 0.19 PeCOFs (total ) NO ng/L 0. 19 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF NO ng/L 0.19 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF NO ng/L 0. 19 HxCOFs (total) NO ng/L 0.76 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.76 1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.76 2,3,4,6,1,8-HxCDF NO n9/L 0.76 1,2,3,1,8,9-HxCDF NO ng/L 0.76 HpCOFs (total ) NO ng/L 0.84 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF NO ng/L 0.84 ' 1,2,3,4,1,8,9-HpCDF NO ng/L 0.84 OCDF NO ng/L 3.3 Dioxins TCDDs (total ) NO ng/L 0. 17 2,3,7,8-TCDD NO ng/L 0.17 PeCODs (total ) NO ng/L 0.97 1,2,3,7,8-PeCOD NO ng/L 0.97 HxCODs (total) NO ng/L 1.4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD NO ng/L 1 .4 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Nng/L 1 .4 HpCODs (total ) NOO n9/L 1.4 g/ 0.61 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDO nL NO OCDD NO n9/L 2.81 NO = Not detected (continued on following page) NA = Not applicable Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. Rev 230787 WEnseco POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS/FURANS ISOMER SPECIFIC ANALYSIS (CONT. ) LOW RESOLUTION Client Name: ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Client ID: O1-FB-001-XXX-02-XX Lab ID: 060285-0003-SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 04 SEP 91 Received: 05 SEP 91 Authorized: 05 SEP 91 Prepared: 20 SEP 91 Analyzed: 23 SEP 91 Sample Amount 0.998 L Column Type DB-5 % Recovery 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 68 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 70 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 72 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 54 13C-1,2,3,4,6,1,8-HpCDD 56 13C-OCOD 42 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Robert Hrabak Approved By: Shelly Eyraud The cover letter is an integral part of this report. Rev 230787 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD NATIONAL PROJECT NAME BL-r ^ 4ILVIE75, SAIEW, VA CM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY(18h- 6F.1h� I`APsik-E �av�lce TESTING, INC. ADDRESS NET Atlantic, Inc., Cambridge Division, 12 Oak Drive, Bedford, MA 01730 PHONE I Formerly Cambridge analytical asaoGates.lnc SAMPLED BY ���a► Coll Ns IANALYSES (PI I Name) Signature Vj 1 (Print Name) Signalure Fz .,:j° f•` '1 t g h SAMPLE 1,TE TIME SAMPLE • •a COMMENTS H - - xx -Ol- <OIL - x -oZ-K oil. v-S.; U -004- - - X o I L_ Iv.38 O - 4 -00 - xx -o - x SOIL 2:1- O - 'j- co - 5. w-rL Oft -SW- Cbl- 'K)(- 02- *A S.Wa1- yHS µiS 12'.Ij 101 -5 -CY> - X - 02- xx yd. Iz.Itit 101-Sh - Coi - xy,- - Se Y^S IIaSD I2"ID 01 - "3- C)OZ- KY, -OZ-)(1, V/a -x -uz- x RS`I of-R - Co -XX- - X; wat 13:11 O -SW-003-XX- 0Z- X 5•IJa v V Rebnpm d b Dale/Timed by �' Imquished by Date/Time Received by Relinquilifflijal by Dale/Time R cerve0 by Relinquished by Date/Time Received for Laboratory by Method of Shipment herrwke, _ PT 1 — ORIGINAL PT 2 NET Project Manaaer—Yellow PT 3—Cuabmer C..,—Pink ANALYTICAL REPORT +-------------------------------------------------------+ ' Report To: Ms. Diana Baldi Ciba-Geigy P.O. Box 18300 Greensborough, NC 27419 Project: Hamblet & Hayes +-------------------------------------------------------+ 10/22/1991 NET Job Number: 91.2074 National Environmental Testing ' NET Atlantic, Inc. Cambridge Division 12 Oak Park Bedford, MA 01730 1 NET ATLANTIC, Cambridge Division ANALYTICAL REPORT I I Report To: Reported By: Ms. Diane Beldi National Environmental Testing Ciba-Geigy MET Atlentic, Incorporated P.O. Box 18300 Cambridge.Divisi on Greensborough, MC 27419 12 Oak Park Bedford, MA 01730 I ' I I Report Date: 10/22/1991 - NET Job Number: 91.2074 Project: Hamblet L Hayes Date Received: 10/17/1991 NET Client No: 12901 P.O. No: C 43864 Collected By: R. Duff Collins Shipped Via: Client Delive� Job Description: Nexavalent Chromium This rrt has been approved and certified for r apo pp Blease by the following staff. Please feel free to call the NET Project Manager at 617-275.3535 with any questions or continents. Eli 1e t J. Adams Michael•FPh . Delaney, .D. , NET P act Manager Laboratory Director Analytical data for the following samples are incl Wed in this data report. -, SAMPLE NET DATE TIME DATE ID ID TAKEN TAKEN RECID MATRIX .................................................................................................. 01-SS-002-XX-02-XX 29474 10/17/1991 11:30 10/17/1991 SO 01-SS-002-XX-02-XD 29475 10/17/1991 11:30 10/17/1991 So 01-SS-001-XX-02-XX 29476 10/17/1991 11:34 10/17/1991 so ' 01-SS-004-XX-02-XX 29477 10/17/1991 11:35 10/17/1991 so 01-SS-003-XX-02-XX 29478 10/17/1991 11:38 10/17/1991 so 01-SD-001-XX-02-XX_ 29479 10/17/1991 12:19 10/17/1991 SO 01-SO-001-XX-02-XD (MS/MSD) 29480 10/17/1991 12:19 10/17/1991 s0 01-SD-002-XX-02-XX 29481 10/17/1991 12:51 10/17/1991 s0 01-SD-003-X%-02-XX 29482 10/17/1991 13:15 10/17/1991 s0 01-SM-001-XX-02-XX 29483 10/17/1991 12:15 10/17/1991 SM 01-SV-001-XX-02.XD (MS/MSD) 29484 10/17/1991 12:15 10/17/1991 SM O1-SM-002-XX-02-XX 29485 10/17/1991 12:40 10/17/1991 SM 01-FB-001-XX-03-XX 29486 10/17/1991 12:51 10/17/1991 SM 01-R8-001-XX-03-XX 29487 10/17/1991 12:54 10/17/1991 Sw 01-SM-003-XX-02-XX 29488 10/17/1991 13:11 10/17/1991 SV , ' NET Atlantic, Cambridge Division ANALYTICAL REPORT Report Date: 10/22/1991 ' Report To: Ciba-Geigy NET Job No: 91.2074 Project: Hanblet i Hayes Date Recd: 10/17/1991 1 Analysis Sample 10 NET ID Result Units Date Analyst ....................................................................................... Extraction, Hexavalent Cr AD EPA 218.5 01-SW-001-XX-02-XX 29483 10/17/1991 date 7:00-8:10 PM tab ' 01-SW-001-XX-02-XD (MS/MSD) 29484 10/17/1991 date 7:00-8:10 PM lab 01-SW-002-XX-02-XX 29485 10/17/1991 date 7:00-8:10 PM tab 01-FB-001-XX-03-XX 29486 10/17/1991 date 7:00-8:10 PM lab 01-RB-001-XX-03-XX 29487 10/17/1991 date 7:00-8:10 PM tab 01-SW-003-XX-02-XX 29488 10/17/1991 date 7:00-8:10 PM lab - Chromiun,Hexaval ant 200 ICP AD EPA 218.5 Mod 01-SW-001-XX-02-XX 29483 0.065 mg/L 10/17/1991 7:28 PM lab 01-SW-001-XX-02-XD (MS/MSD) 29484 <0.050 mg/L " " lab ' 01-SW-002-XX-02-XX 29485 <0.050 mg/L " • lab 01-FB-001-XX-03-XX 29486 <0.050 mg/L " " lab 01-RB-001-XX-03-XX 29487 <0.050 mg/L • " lab 01-SW-003-XX-02-XX 29488 4.050 mg/L " " lab 1 NET Atlantic, Cambridge Division , ANALYTICAL REPORT Report Date: 10/22/1991 Report To: Ciba-Geigy NET Job No: 91.2074 Project: Namblet i "eyes Date RecId: 10/17/1991 Sanple ID MET ID Result Analyst , ...................................................................................''" Extraction, Nexavalent Cr S SW846, 7195 O1-SS-002-XX-02-XX 29474 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jmk 01-SS-002-XX-02-XD 29475 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jars 01-SS-DOI-XX-02-XX 29476 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jmk 01-SS-004-XX-02-XX 29477 10/17/1991 date 9:30.11:40 PM jmk 01-SS-003-XX-02-XX 29478 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jmk 01-0-001-0-02-0 29479 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jat 01-SD-001-XX-02-XD (MS/MSD) 29480 10/17/1991 date 9:30.11:40 PM jmk 01-SD-002-XX-02-XX 29481 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jmk 01-SD-003-XX-02-XX 29482 10/17/1991 date 9:30-11:40 PM jmk Chromium Nexavalent S SW846, 7195 mod 01-SS-002-XX-02-XX 29474 <0.51 mg/Kg 10/18/1991 8:18 AM cme 01-SS-002-XX-02-XD 29475 <0.51 mg/Kg w " We , 01-SS-001-0-02-XX 29476 1.3 RV/Kg " " eme 01-SS-004-XX-02-XX 29477 <0.57 Mg/Kg " " cam 01-SS-003-XX-02-XX 29478 4.56 mg/Kg " • Me 01-SD-001-XX-02-0 29479 3.1 ag/Kg " • else 01-SD-001-XX-02-XD (MS/MSD) 29480 3.1 mg/Kg • " elue 01-SO-002-XX-02-XX 29481 2.1 Mg/Kg • cme 01-SD-003-XX-02-XX 29482 1.8 mg/Kg • cme ' NET Atlantic, Cambridge Division ' BATCH QUALITY CONTROL DATA Report To: Ciba-Geigy MFT Job No: 91.2074 ' Program: Nexavalent Chromium Report Date: 10/22/1991 ' Matrix Spike LCS Method Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample Duplicate ' Parameter 7 Recovery Blank Recovery Recovery (Run 1) (Run 2) mg/L Percent Percent mg/Kg mg/Kg .................................................................................................................. -� Chromium,Nexavalent Aqueous 78 40.050 93 90 40.050 40.050 Chromium Nexavalent Soil 82 40.050 75 76 3.1 - 2.5 LCS - Laboratory Control Sample . t 1 1 - 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ' 0080 Loi LLi v"L uL OT. mind niH U " ! .Z 0080 -66 LLi uL uL uL S 88T16z-,/LOE vi-c00-MIS-Lu 0080 L6i LT/0 L 0L uL S Ln6oc-4Lu"c iiti-Luv""-n3-Lv =? 0080 LoitLi 0L uL 0L 5 98T16Z-TI LO(. AA-LUU�H1-LU Uri ' ! »'! -0060 LoiL6iuL OOT OT S S8Ti62-TILv2 riii-EOG-iiS-Lu -!v' ! an, 0060 T6/LT/OT uL 0 ZS v8G6E-'IL0z iOd-100-i•iS-10 »'F uue0 T6/LT/OT 0-6 OL S 48TroE-TILOF, tid-Lvu-i9S-LG 0080 T6/L!/OT 0T ui, Su T16T16L-TrLOL iid-LOOMS-10 »' 0080 T6iLTiuL OT !T S ce@6E-TrL0Z nii-LOO-i•iS-10 0080------ L6i LLi-- -- --------------- cillswdd------- UUii:ll iii -iaait 'dead ____ `u:I JOA w I TOi. 6PC� -_ i _e.ivAlj -cUu 8;e�j LTUTJ LET{TUI1 UL l c o d'um sT `4 J Ul +ULJ iiOrii c.Oi3i'ii d ePOO dead ------------------------------------------------------------------ riwTini -TILOC _MTI I•_ �/_1_ -ti T/A•/A _ ,__I q TIP // / -------------------------------------------------------------------------- •,- wd GD= gie"i (11 er3'WMc 1- --------------------------------------------------------------- Z;G.UTad ------------ In ii v'1 t'!� in_I:I T,_1.{1 :u:.icv vea4 11 to °'^ ciivHfi�i1 S3vdid NoiSuaSdidd $Idirris ' SAMPLE MEPTDHTTn11 REPORT: SOIL, CEDTMTTTT, SLUDGE N�_e _ Pier batch":: oc)RblrrC PS1.^.tea t'1 L-------------------------------------------------T--- _�ri: - ---.r---- MOISTr,TRVASu j,ETEPMT/.iTTTn Sample ID Lab Cont Cc^.t + Cort + Wet Lam^; -v ��; "FE 7, ItTAT code art uret smPl dr- =P1 vt, 6 ort, 6 20)74-20117. S 1 . 61^ 7 , 670 7 , 590 6 . 060 5, 990 oa ---- 2n74-291:75 S 1 . 500 7 . 640 7 . 570 6 . 05n 5 . 986 9A . .. 2079-29:76 S 1 . 600 6 , 260 5, 810 11 . 660 11 , 210 Gr, 2071;-29477 S 1 . 590 7 . 200 6 . 51.0 5 . 610 : . 950 0-r . .% 207/i-291.78 S 1, 600 6 . 100 5 . 610 li . 500 qg.010 wi 2074-29:79 S 1 . 600 5 . 750 2 , 380 11 . 150 n . 78n in , w n 2074-291190 S 1.590 6. 22^ 2 . 530 1. , 630 0.9/n ?: 2074-29/180 S2 1 . 590 A . 220 2530 : . 630 n 91;0 20711-291.A1 S 1. 620 7 5?0 3 . 010 5 . 950 1. 300 2 S 1 Y0?/1-291-�- -------- -5 n----o-a0n----3-330----6_190----1-720---- ------- Prep cede P rura03/HO1i Client ID Sample ID Lab Sam,-1e Final Date 7:0-a insp, a j i 6 Vo1 ,ml Prep.. lig+ Ti iprjnn 1PPM-QTD LOSS 10- ' -------------------------------------------------------------- _---------- nn w 100 1^117191 0800 Ew-W 01-SS-002-XX 2074-201174 S 10 .nn w 100 10/1?191 0Q00 E,ik ' nl -SS-nn2-w 2n74-29475 S 10, nn w 100 10/17 /91 0800 EDW 0-I-SS-001-P!! 207/:-20476 S In nn w Inn 10/17 /91 0800 Eck ii ; 01_Sc_nn4_pv, 2n74-2947? S 1n . n0 W inn 10/17/91 0800 EOW 01-SS-Qn3-vv 2n74-291_?e S 11-1 . 00 W 100 1n /77 /ol 08nn E,-f_; ' n1-cn_nn1 -FV 2n71. -20470 c I nn 1.7 inn In /17101 nano E-d g : .., i D1-SD-0.01-v} 20741-291.- 80 LIS i1-i T.7 l0- ) In /17/91 nen i Fi-W n1-en_nn1-vv 2n74-201.an 9 10 ,00 w inn 10/17 /91 0800 EC-W q. .%: ' 01-SD-001-vv 2074-201.80- -c- 10 . 00 w inn10-117,/al 080/„ 7,�' 01-SD-0n2_M'K 207;-29491 S 10 , 00 w inn 10117 /01 0800 Evil, i 01-SD-nn3-vv 2074-29482 S i11 00 W 100 10117/91 0800 12T PBS 10 ,00 W Inn 10/17/91 0800 E:7119 " • •''r ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- i 1 1 1 WMEM MEEME MENMEN wmm IME mm mm�i��� �emm • , . , . , . � ' ®moi■iisc�■■ . .. ■■■■■■r�■■� mm 10101010110 INS ME SOON ■■��■■■���■■■■■ own, !VNIOM MIN ��NONE!� Ion"- -I • �:7Cl1"�l�f���� CLP METALS 3 .00h ' cr6+: 91. 207'4 ' Run id: I9 9139101 nci.:ired: 10!18!54 nv T.F. JOBIN YVObT MODEL 50 ICP Crunched: 10!27.!51 n.y F04 Analytical method: P Time: 0796 Element: Cr Processing protonn i . 7tw!x ' CP.DL: 10. 00 IDL: 50. 00 Default v a•:elength: 267 .7300 Linear range: 300000 .00 Poi ' Sample Code Dil M Prep P Solution Final TT^.;-.s FiAaF Batch C meas . mg!L Conc'n 1 ICV1T ICV 1.00 P 0. 97135 0.971350-- rnaiT. 2 CBLB ICE 1.00 P -0.00309 -0.003100r, ma/T. TT ' 3 ICSH_ ICSrB0 1.00 P 0. 95913 0. 'i5111000 m3 TD 'T•• 'i 1PPMSLCSS 1.00 S 00591CS P 0. 81815 0.8187500 mc!I 5 BLT{ PBS 1. 00 S 00591CS P 0.00711 0.0500000 mciT. "r 6 2071i-291i80 S 1. 00 S 00591CS P 0. 06331 3 . JIAA lima VA, ' 7 207'1-291480 DS 1 .00 S 005111CS P 0. 81172 39 .9RA% l`a-'_ ' 8 207'4-29'480 DS2 1.00 S 005'i1CS P 0. 82137 1i .n1i57 :icic 9 2079-29'480 S3 1.00 S 00591CS P 0. 014850 2 .4E31 n_ie y ' 10 207'4-29982 S 1 .00 S 00591CS P 0.031i'i6 1.79AA iierc 'r 11 2079-29'476 S 1.00 S 00591CS P 0. 11853 1. 31 %5 T:c!a. V 12 2071i-29i7'1 S 1. 00 S 005giCS P 0.00286 0. 50AA i:cie Y ' 13 CALB CCE 1.00 P -0. 00306 -0.0031000 mail. TT 1'i STD1 CCV 1.00 P 10. 20700 10. 207000+' mc_iT. 16 2079-29981 S 1.00 S 00591CS P 0.09199 2. 1IA5 naia y 17 207'4-29109 S 1 .00 S 00591CS P 0.05906 3 . 'i %i i 5 iia i s V 18 207'4-29977 S 1.00 S 00591CS P 0 .00689 0. 9;tz.A 1!a a 'v 19 2079-39978 S 1.00 S 00591CS P 0.00887 0.56i % 11_.- 20 2079-29175 S 1.00 S 005h1CS P -0.00009 0. 50A i eia%a "r ' 21 CRLB CCB 1.00 P 0.00922 0.00a!ZO0n ma/T. TT 22 STD1 CCV 1.00 P 10 . 09500 10.09500nn ma/T. ' k e CLP METALS 3 . 00h Q*'S+: 91. 20711 Run id: I9 9139101 Acquired: 10!19!4i by r- JOBIN )NON MODEL 50 ICP Cr,-,ached: 10!3 ?!4 i n;• F.7vi, rn al+ical method: P Time : 071.6 Element: Cr Processing protonnl IpteT.ITME�7T DLrn7 CC vrDn'Wr -- - CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS ' Position Sa^.tple ID Code True Value Found Value 'G PAnnvA"7 1 ICV11A ICV 1000.0000 971. 3500 47 . i ill STD1 CCV 10000.0000 10307 .0000 i i!::. i ' 22 STD1 ^CV 10000 .0000 10095 . 0000 CALIBRATION BLP.:7,S Position Sample ID Code CP.DL Found Value 2 CALB ICB 10 .0000 -3 .1000 i7 , 13 CP.LB CCB 10 . 0000 -3. 1000 IT 21 CALB CCB 10. 0000 li . 3000 IT CP^L STrNDYLR.DS Position. Sample ID Code True Value Found Value y Ngnn..q� No CRS ' iNTEDprDc*7CF CHECK STnL?,iTn DT1C ' Position Sample ID Code True Value Found Value i✓gnnvq^+ 3 ICSAB ICSnB0 500, 0000 7:54 . 1000 4'! • w CLP MET A LS 3 . 00h cr6+: 91. 30711 Pun id: I9 9139101 Acquired: 10!1R!?1 T JOBI*7 WON MODEL 50 ICP Crunched: ' P.nal;,tical method: P Time: 071,6 Ele—ent: Multi-Element Processing Prntnnnl : 70wq ' Poe Sample Code Preparation Clie-t ID Date Time -- Meth Batch Date 4 m 1 ICV1A ICV P ICV 10/le/91 r. : i r: :< 2 CP.LB ICB P ICE 10/1R!91 A 6 3 ICS.*.B ICS.ABO P ICSAB 10/le/91 11 1PPMSTD LCSS P 0051,1CQ- 1-0/17!91 LCSS 10/1R!9i I.. : 5 BLK PES P 00541CS 10!17!91 PES 10/le/9i A : %% : ' 6 30711-391180 S P 00541CS 10/17/91 01-SD-001-)x-10/1Rl9i 7 30711-39:80 DS P 005111CS 10/17/91 01-SD-001-)':-10/1e/9'i A : %7 : %, 8 20711-291180 DS3 P 005111CS 10!17/91 01-SD-001-LX-10/1Rl9i 9 30714-29480 S3 P 00541CS 10/17/91 01-SD-001-Fr-10/lel9i A ' 10 20711-29482 S P 005111CS 10/17/91 01-SD-003-)Y-10/1Rl9i 11 2074-291176 S P 005111CS 10/17/91 01-SS-001-)x-10/18!? i 13 20711-29474 S P 005111CS 10/17/91 01-SS-002-)x-10/1Rl4i ' 13 CALB CCB P CCB 10/18/9i A : %i%: 5 111 STD1 CCV P CCV 10/1R/9i A :45 :." 16 30711-39481 S P 0051,1CS 10/17/91 01-SD-002-)M-10/le/4i A: •^•": % 17 207q-291.79 S P 0054lCS 10/17/91 01-SD-001-X.-10/1Rl9i ' 18 20711-391177 S P 0054!CS !0/!7!91 01-SS-004-)x-10/le/9i r. : 55: .+ 19 30711-39478 S P 0054lCS !0!17/91 01-SS-003-)x-10/1R.l4i P. : ,5A .6 20 20711-391105 S P 00541CS 10/17/91 01-SS-002-)':-10/18/4i 4 :ii:: .i 21 CP? B CCE P CCB 10!1Rl4.1 4 % :ir 22 STD1 CCV P CCV 10/le/9 i Y (1\ �.` CLP METALS 3.00h cr6+: 91 .2040, 91 .2074 1/ Run id: 19 9129003 Acquired: 10/17/91 by CE , JOBIN YVON MODEL 50 ICP Crunched: 10/18/91 by LB , Analytical method: P Time : 1737 Element : Cr Processing protocol : Comm CROL: 10.00 IDL: 50.00 Default wavelength: 267.7200 , Linee r&nge: 200000.00 Pas . Sample Code Dil M Prep P Solution Final Units Flal Batch C meas. mg/L Conc' n i 1 ICVIA ICV 1 .00 P 0.97186 0.9718600 ms/L 2 CALB ICB 1 .00 P -0.01203 -0.0120000 mg/L U 3 ICSAB ICSABO 1 .00 P 0.43334 0.4333000 mg/L 26 CALB CCB 1 .00 P -0.00456 -0.0046000 mg/L U 27 STD1 CCV 1 .00 P 10. 11200 10. 1120000 mg/L 31 1PPMSTD LCSS 1 .00 S 00539CS P 0.83707 0.8371 ug/g 32 BLK PBS 1 .00 S 00539CS P -0.00151 0.0500 ug/g Y 33 2040-29392 S 1 .00 S 00539CS P -0.00027 0.0534 ug/g Y 34 2040-29392 DS 1 .00 S 00539CS P 0.85776 0.9154 ug/9 35 2040-29392 S2 1 .00 S 00539CS P 0.00136 0.0534 ug/g Y� 36 2040-29391 S 1 .00 S 00539CS P 0.00410 0.0545 ug/g Y S 1 .00 S 00539CS P -0.00036 0.0541 ug/g Y 37 2040-29386ug/9 38 2040-29387 S 1 .00 S 00539CS P -0.00050 0.0547 Y 39 CALB CCB 1 .00 P -0.00015 -0.0002000 mg/L U 40 STDI CCV 1 .00 P 10.08600 10.0860000 mg/L 42 2040-29388 S 1 .00 S 00539CS P -0.00155 0.0556 ug/g Y 43 CALB CCB 1 .00 P 0.00122 0.0012000 mg/L U 44 CCV1 CCV 1 .00 P 10. 17200 10. 1720000 mg/L 46 1PPMSTD LCSW 1 .00 W 00540CU P 0.78415 0.7841500 mg/L 47 BLK PBW 1 .00 W 00540CU P -0.00196 0.0500000 mg/L Y 48 2074-29487 S 1 .00 W 00540CW P -0.00163 0.0500000 mg/L Y i 49 2074-29483 S 1 .00 W 00540CU P 0.06468 0.0646800 mg/L Y , 50 2074-29485 S 1 .00 W 00540CU P 0.01360 0.0500000 mg/L Y 51 2074-29484 S 1 .00 W 00540CU P 0.01246 0.0500000 mg/L Y 52 2074-29484 DS 1 .00 W 00540CU P 0.93320 0.9332000 mg/L 53 2074-29484 DS 1 .00 W 00540CW P 0.89866 0.8986600 mg/L 54 2074-29484 S2 1 .00 W 00540CU P 0.00819 0.0500000 mg/L Y 55 2074-29486 S 1 .00 W 00540CW P 0.00358 0.0500000 mg/L Y 56 CALB CCB 1 .00 P -0.00384 -0.0038000 mg/L U' 57 STD1 CCV 1 .00 P 10.05900 10.0590000 ms/L 59 2074-29488 S 1 .00 W 00540CW P 0.00293 0.0500000 mg/L Y 60 CALB CCB 1 .00 P -0.00040 -0.0004000 mg/L U, 61 STD1 CCV 1 .00 P 10.25600 10.2560000 mg/L i _ CLP METALS 3.0Oh cr6+: 91 .2040. 91 .2074 Run id: I9 9129003 Acquired: 10/17/91 by CE JOBIN YVON MODEL 50 ICP Crunched: 10/18/91 by LB Analytical method: P Time : 1737 Element: Cr Processing protocol : Conn j ' INSTRUMENT RUN QC REPORT y ` CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS Position Sample ID Code True Value Found Value % Recovery I ICV1A ICV 1000.0000 971 .8600 97.2 44 CCV1 CCV 10000.0000 10172.0000 101 .7 27 STDI CCV 10000.0000 10112.0000 101 . 1 j 40 ST01 CCV 10000.0000 10086.0000 100.9 57 STDI CCV 10000.0000 10059.0000 100.6 61 STDI CCV 10000.0000 10256.0000 102.6 ' CALIBRATION BLANKS ' Position Sample ID Code CRDL Found Value Flag t 2 CALB ICB 10.0000 -12.0000 U ' 26 CALB CCB 10.0000 -4.6000 U 39 CALB CCB 10.0000 -0.2000 U j 43 CALB CCB 10.0000 1 .2000 U 56 CALB CCB 10.0000 -3.8000 U ' 60 CALB CCB 10.0000 -0.4000 U I CRDL STANDARDS Position Sample ID Code True Value Found Value : Recovery No CRs ' INTERFERENCE CHECK STANDARDS ' Position Sample ID i Code True Value Found Value : Recovery 3 ICSAB ICSABO 500.0000 433.3000 86.7 CLP METALS 3.00h cr6+: 91 .2040, 91 .2074 Run id: I9 9129003 Acquired: 10/17/91 by CE , JOSIN YVON MODEL 50 ICP Crunched: 10/18/91 by LS Analytical method: P Time: 1737 Element : Multi-Element Processing protocol : conn POS '.SawI a Code Preparation Client ID - Date Time Meth Batch Date PM I -1--4 CV1A ICV P ICV 10/17/91 18:28:3: 2 CALB ICB P ICB 10/17/91 18:32 3 ICSAB ICSABO P ICSAB 10/17/91 18:37 26 CALB CCB P CCB 10/17/91 19:35:u 27 STOI CCV P CCV 10/17/91 19:37. 4 31 IPPMSTD LCSS P 00539CS 10/17/91 LCSS 10/17/91 19:49 32 BLK PBS P 00539CS 10/17/91 PBS 10/17/91 19:51 33 2040-29392 S P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-1 10/17/91 19:54:3 34 2040-29392 DS P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-1S 10/17/91 19:57 35 2040-29392 S2 P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-ID 10/17/91 19:59' 36 2040-29391 S P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-2 10/17/91 20:02:0 37 2040-29386 S P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-3 10/17/91 20:04•n 38 2040-29387 S P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-4 10/17/91 20:07' 39 CALB CCB P CCB 10/17/91 20:09._ 40 STOI CCV P CCV 10/17/91 20: 12:0 42 2040-29388 S P 00539CS 10/17/91 SS-6 10/17/91 20: 17 43 CALB CCB P CCB 10/17/91 20: 19 i 44 CCV1 CCV P CCV 10/17/91 20:22: 1 f 46 1PPMSTO LCSW P 00540CW 10/17/91 LCSW 10/17/91 20:30 47 BLK PBW P 00540CW 10/17/91 PBW 10/17/91 20:321 ( 48 2074-29487 S P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-RB-001-XX-10/17/91 20:35. . ` 49 2074-29483 S P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-SW-001-XX-10/17/91 20:37:4 ftt 50 2074-29485 S P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-SW-002-XX-10/17/91 20:40' 51 2074-29484 S P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-SW-001-XX-10/17/91 20:42 52 2074-29484 DS P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-SW-001-XX-10/17/91 20:45: 1 . 53 2074-29484 DS P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-SW-001-XX-10/17/91 20:47 " 54 2074-29484 S2 P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-SW-001-XX-10/17/91 20:50 55 2074-29486 S P 00540CW 10/17/91 01-FB-001-XX-10/17/91 20:52. 56 CALB CCB P CCB 10/17/91 20:55:2. 57 STDs CCV P CCV 10/17/91 20:5 59 2074-29488 S P 00540CW 10/17/91 01—SW-003—XX-10/17/91 21 :0 60 CALB CCB P CCB 10/17/91 21 :05:3 61 STOI CCV P CCV 10/17/91 21 :08 I ' Environmental Testing Laboratory CIBA GEIGY ' CIBA-GEIGY Corporation P 0. Box 71, Route 37 West Toms River, New Jersey 08754 Telephone 908 349 5200 Fax 908 505 9195 October 30, 1991 ABB Environmental Services, Inc. ' Corporate Place 128, 107 Audubon Road Wakefield, MA 01880 ' Attention: Paul Exner Re: Hamblet and Hayes Report No. : 91E-1011, Revised Dear Paul: ' Enclosed are the revisions for the above referenced project. These samples were received a CEIBA-GEIGY's Corporate Environmental Testing Laboratory on September 5, 1991. Sample ' descriptions and methodology have been corrected. Please insert the appropriate pages into your report. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at extension 2386. Sincerely, Kimberly A. Glenn Manager, Project Coordination ' KAG:dr Enclosure ' Pnmeu on Recycled PaOer ' Environmental Testing Laboratory VI✓�-GEIGY t CIBA-GEIGY Corporation P.O. Box 71, Route 37 West " Toms River, New Jersey 08754 Telephone 908 349 5200 Fax 908 505 9195 October 23 , 1991 ABB Environmental Services, Inc. Corporate Place 128, ' Audobon Road Wakefield, MA 01880 Attention: Paul Exner Re: Hamblet and Hayes ' Report No. : 91E-1011 Dear Paul: Enclosed are the of results of analyses performed on samples for the above referenced project. These samples were received at CIBA-GEIGY's Corporate Environmental Testing Laboratory on September 5, 1991. If you have any questions or need additional information, please ' feel free to call me at extension 2386 . Sincerely, 1 a-IJ&AII Kimberly A. Glenn ' Manager, Project Coordination KAG:dr ' Enclosure ' �� PIin�B'J 0e1 F0GyCIBp PePBI CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION' ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEY ' MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY CERTIFICATION ID: NJ254 ' CLIENT NAME: CIBA-GEIGY Corporation ' Hamblet and Hayes ' PROJECT NAME: Limited Site Investigation ' Hamblet& Hayes Site, Salem MA PROJECT CODE: HHSALEM CHARGE NUMBER: QF-100,000S ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-101 1 REPORT DATE: 23-Oct-91 ' Jo sel ' Laboratory Director ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEtGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL.TESTING LABORATORY ' Laboratory Chronicle - Semivolatiles ' ETL Client Date Date Date Designation Designation Matrix Samoled Extracted Analyzed ' 91090234 01-$D-001-XXX-0I-XX Sediment 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 91090235 01-$D-001-XXX-0I-XD(MS) Sediment 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 91090236 01-$D-001-XXX-0I-XD(MSD) Sediment 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 ' 91090237 01-$D-002-XXX-0I-XX Sediment 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 91090238 01-$D-003-XXX-0I-XX Sediment 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 91090242 01-RB-001-XXX-02-XX Water 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 ' 91090245 01-FB-001-XXX-02-XX Water 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/27/91 ' Laboratory Chronicle - PCB's ' EfL Client Date Date Date Designation Designation Matrix Samoled Extracted Analyzed ' 91090227 01-$$-002-XXX-0I-XX Soil 9/04/91 9/20/91 9/24/91 91090228 01-$$-002-XXX-0I-XD(MS) Soil 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/14/91 1 91090229 01-$$-001-XXX-Ot-X0( Soil 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/14/91 ' 91090230 01-$$-003-XXX-0I-XX Soil 9/04/91 9/20/91 9/24/91 91090231 01-$$-004-XXX-O7-XX Soil 9/04/91 9/20/91 9/24/91 91090232 01-$$-002-XXX-0I-XD(MSD) Soil 9/04/91 9/10/91 9/14/91 ' 91090245 01-FB-001-XXX-02-XX Water 9/04/91 9/10/91 . 9/24/91 REPORT NUMBER: 91 E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 Laboratory Chronicle - Chloride ' ETL Client , Date Date Desionation Designation Matrix Sampled Analyzed ' 91090239 01-$D-003-XXX-Ot-XX Water 9/04/91 9/18/91 91090240 01-$W-001-XXX-0I-XX(MS) Water 9/04/91 9/18/91 91090241 01-$W-001-XXX-0I-XX(MSD) Water 9/04/91 9/18191 91090242 01-RB-001-XXX-02-XX Water /04! 1 9 9 9/18/91 91090243 01-$W-002-XXX-Ot-XX Water 9/04/91 9/18/91 , 91090244 01-$W-003-XXX-001-XX Water 9/04/91 9/18/91 ' 91090245 01-FB-001-XXX-02-XX Water ate 9/04/91 9/18/91 . 1 l ' REPORT NUMBER: 91E-1011 GIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION ' 30-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' Laboratory Chronicle - Metals ' ETL Client Date ' Designation Designation Matrix Sampled 91090227 01-$$-002-XXX-0I-XX Soil 9/04/91 91090228 01-$$-002-XXX-0I-XD(MS) Soil 9/04/91 91090229 01-$$-001-XXX-0I-XX Soil 9/04/91 91090230 01-$$-003-XXX-0I-XX Soil 9/04/91 ' 91090231 01-$$-004-XXX-0I-XX Soil 9/04/91 ' 91090232 01-$$-002-XXX-0I-XD(MSD) Soil 9/04/91 91090234 01-$D-001-XXX-0I-XX Sediment 9/04/91 ' 91090235 01-$D-001-XXX-0I-XD(MS) Sediment 9/04/91 91090236 01-$D-001-XXX-0I-XD(MSD) Sediment 9/04/91 91090237 01-$0-002-XXX-Ot-XX Sediment 9/04/91 ' 91090238 01-$D-003-XXX-0I-)0( Sediment 9/04/91 ' 91090239 01-$W-001-XXX-0I-XX Water 9/04/91 91090240 01-$W-001-XXX-0I-XX(MS) Water 9/04/91 ' 91090241 01-$W-001-XXX-0I-XX(MSD) Water 9/04/91 91090242 01-RB-001-XXX-02-XX Water 9/04/91 91090243 01-$W-002-XXX-0I-XX Water 9/04/91 ' 91090244 01-$W-003-XXX-0I-XX Water 9/04/91 91090245 01-FB-001-XXX-02-XX Water 9/04/91 ' ��V Pn w F�P� REPORT NUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 1 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 Metals- Date Analyzed 1 Sample Hg Be *9/18/91 *Cu*Cr9/18/91 9/24/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090228 9/25/91 9/18/919/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 1 91090229 9/25/91 9/18/919/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090230 9/25/91 9/18/919/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/78/91 91090231 9/25/91 9/18/919/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 1 91090232 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090234 9/25/91 1 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/24/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090235 9/25/91 1 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 1 91090236 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090237 9/25/91 9/19/91 9/19/91 9/19/91 9/19/91 9/19/91 9/19/91 91090238 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 1 91090239 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090240 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090241 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18191 9/18/91 1 91090242 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 91090243 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18191 91090244 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 1 91090245 9/25/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 9/18/91 Sample Ag As Pb Sb Se TI 1 No. 91090227 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 1 91090228 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090229 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090230 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 1 91090231 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090232 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090234 9/19/91 9/17/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 1 91090235 9/19/91 9/17/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090236 9/19/91 9/17/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090237 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/1'6/91 9/12191 9/16/91 9/13/91 1 91090238 9/19/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 1 9/12/91 1 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090239 9/20/91 9/16/91 9/27/91 9/12/91 9/27/91 9/13/91 91090240 9/20/91 9/16/91 9/27/91 9/12/91 9/27/91 9/13/91 1 91090241 9/20/91 9/16/91 9/27/91 9/12/91 9/27/91 9/13/91 91090242 9/20/91 9/16/91 9/17/91 9/12191 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090243 9/20191 9/16/91 9/17/91 9/12/91 9/16/91 9/13/91 1 91090244 9/20/91 9/16/91 9/16/91 9/12/91 1 9/16/91 9/13/91 91090245 1 9/20/91 1 9/16/91 1 9/16/91 9/12/91 1 9/16/91 9/13/91 i � i REPORT NUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 30-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY V Definitions ND Not detected at or above method detection limit. ' J Detected but below method detection limit. 8 Analyte detected in blank, reported concentration in sample not corrected for amount in blank. NA Not applicable. N/A Not Available. Method Detection Limit Lowest concentration (amount) that must be present before a reliable and recognizable response is observed for that method of analysis. When a sample has been diluted, the Method Detection Limit has ' been multiplied by the dilution factor. ' Methodology Semivolatile (PAH) organic analyses were performed in accordance with Method 8270, SW-846, EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, 3rd Edition. PCB analyses were performed in accordance with Method 8080, SW-846, EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, 3rd edition. ICP Metals analyses were performed in accordance with Method 6010, SW 846, EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, 3rd edition. - Furnace metals, mercury and inorganic analyses were perfromed in accordance with EPA Test Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. a REPORT NUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-.GE[GY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL-TESTING LABORATORY Narrative t All data provided for soils and sediments has been reported on a dry weight basis. Extracts for semivolatile analyses had to be diluted because of the presence of matrix interferences. Organic analysis results have not been blank corrected in any way. Metal analysis results have been corrected for any analyte found in the reagent(digestion) blanks. For PCB analysis, samples 91090227, 91090230 and 91090231 were originally extracted on 9/10/91 as low level soils, but matrix interferences made accurate quantitation impossible. The samples were reextracted on 9/20 as high level soils. However, even with the higher dilutions, the surrogates were still outside QC Limits. Poor matrix spike recoveries were observed for some of the pesticide spiking compounds as a result of multiple high boiling components that respond to an electron capture detector(ECD). This material was present in significant concentration in all of the solid samples. Because of the resemblance of the ECD chromatograms to PCB's, an extract was subjected to a GC/MS library search. No PCB's were identified. ,1 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 Semivolatiles 91090234 METHOD91090237 METHOD ' 01-$0-001= DETECTION 01-$D-002- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-OI-XX. LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT ' Napthalene NO 7700 Napthalene NO 7400 Acenaphthylene NO 7700 Acenaphthylene NO 7400 Acenaphthene NO 7700 Acenaphthene NO 7400 Phenanthrene 2600 J 7700 Phenanthrene 2500 J 7400 Anthracene NO 7700 Anthracene NO 7400 Fluoranthene 6400 J 7700 Fluoranthene X5400 ;{ 7400 Pyrene 5800 J 7700 Pyrene 5000 J 7400 Benzo(a)anthracene NO 7700 Benzo(a)anthracens NO 7400 Chrysene 3100 J 7700 Chrysene 2700 J 7400 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3300::) 7700 Senzo(b)fluoranthene 4200' J 7400 ' Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2800 J 7700 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1800 J 7400 Senzo(a)pyrene 2800 J 7700 Benzo(a)pyrene 2500.J 7400 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene -800 J 7700 . Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrens 1500 J 7400 Dibenz(a,h))anthracene NO,- 7700 Dibenz(a,h))anthracene NO 7400 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO 7700 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1300 J 7400 (ug/Kg) (ug/Kg) (ug/Kg). (ug/Kg) ' Surrogates %Recover OC Limits Surrogates %Recovervl OC Limits Nitrobenzene-D5 13 23-120% Nitrobenzene-DS 18' 23-120% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 52 30-115% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 53 - 30-115% Terphenyl-D14 73 18-137% Terphenyl-D14 78 18-137% *Outside OC Limits PAGE 1 1 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Sernivolatiles (Continued) ' 91090238 METHOD 91090242 METHOD 01-$D-003- DETECTION 01-RB-001- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT Napthalene NO 6800 Napthalene NO 10 ' Acenaphthylene NO 6800 Acenaphthylene NO 10 Acenaphthene NO 6800 Acenaphthene NO - 10 Phenanthrene 2200 J 6800 Phenanthrene NO 10 Anthracene NO 6800 Anthracene NO 10 Fluoranthene 4300 J 6800 Fluoranthene NO 10 Pyrene 4100 J 6800 Pyrene NO, 10 Senzo(a)anthracene NO 6800 Benzo(a)anthracene NO' 10 ' Chrysene 2400 J 6800 Chrysene NO 10 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2700. ) 6800 Benzo(b)fluoranthene NO . - 10 Benzo(k)fluoranthens ..1900 -J 6800 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO 10 Benzo(a)pyrene 2000 J 6800 Benzo(a)pyrens NO 10 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1000 J 6800 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 10 Dibenz(a,h))anthracene NO 6800 Dibenz(a,h))anthracene NO 10 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 920 J 6800 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO 10 (u9/Kg) (ug/Kg) (ug/L) _ (U9,L) Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits Surrogates %Recover) OC Limits ' Nitrobenzene-D5 18 23-120% Nitrobenzene-DS 50 23-120% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 49 30-115% 2-Fluorobiphenyl so 30-115% Terphenyl-D14 74 18-137% Terphenyl-D14 60 ` 18-137% 'Outside OC Limits PAGE 2 1 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY. CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING>LABORATORY Semivolatiles ' (Continued) '. 91090245 METHOD 01-FB-001- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX'-02-XX LIMIT ' Napthalene NO 10 ACenaphthylene NO 10 Acenaphthene NO 10 ' Phenanthrene NO 10 Anthracene NO 10 Fluoranthene - NO 10 Pyrene NO 10 Benzo(a)anthracene NO - 10 Chrysene NO 10 Senzo(b)fluoranthene : .NO: 10 ' Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO 10 Benzo(a)pyrene NO 10 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NO 10 Dibenz(a,h))anthracene NO 10 ' Benzo(g,h,i)perylens NO 10 - (ug/L) (ug/L) ' Surrogates % Recovery. OC Limits Nitrobenzene-D5 51 23-120% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 51'. 30-115% Terphenyl-D14 -57 18-137% t ' PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 30-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY PCBs 91090227 METHOD ' 91090229 P,tETHCG 01-S$-002 DETECTION 01-SS-001- DETECTICr PARAMETER XXX-0I-XXLIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX UMF PCB-1260 ND 200 PCB-1260 NO 2" PCB-1242 ND 85 PCB-1242 NO 7.9 PCB-1254 NO 300 PCB-1254 ND 32 , PCB-1221 NO 170 PCB-1221 ND PCB-1232 NO 670 PCB-1232 NO PCB-1248 NO 630 PCB-1248 NO d0, PCB-1016 ND .: 1200 PCB-1016 NO 3C0 (ug/Kg) (ug/Kg) (ug/Kg) (uc/K ) , Surrogates % Recoveiv OC Limits Surrogates o_io Recovery OC Lim-[s Dibutylchlorendate .1080 24-154% Dibutylchlorendate 957 24-15401, ' 91090230 METHOD 91090231 METHOD 01-SS-003-•'' DETECTION 01-$S-004- DEfECT10N PARAMETER XXX-01`=XX" LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-Ot-XX L!P.tIT PCB-1260 ND 220 PCB-1260 ND 210 PCB-1242 ND 91 PCB-1242 ND 6Q20 � PCB-1254 ND 320 PCB-1254 NO 3 PCB-1221 NO 1800 PCB-1221 ND. - 1220 PCB-1232 ND 710 PCB-1232 ND 700 PCB-1248 ND 670 PCB-1248ND 660 PCB-1016 ND 1300 PCB-1016 ND 1300 (ug/K9) (ug/Kg) (ug/Kg) (ug/Kg) Surrogates 46 Recovery . OC Limits Surrogates % Recovery OC Linos Dibutylchlorendate 462 24-154% Dibutylchlorendate 188 24-154x% ' 'Outside OC Limits PAGE 4 , D� RagdW ftWr , ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23—Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Pesticides and PCBs (Continued) 91090245: METHOD 01-FB-001- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT PCB-1260 ND 0.40 PCB-1242 ND 0.17 PCB-1254ND 0.60 PCB-1221 NO 3.3 PCB-1232 NO 1.3 PCB-1248 ND 1.2 PCB-.1016 ND 2.4 (ug/L (ug/L) Surrogates %Recovery OC Limits Dibutylchlorendate 98 24-154% 1 r r i I 1 ' PAGE REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Metals ' 91090227 METHOD 91090227 METHOD 01-$$-002- DETECTION 01-$$-002- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT , Beryllium 2.5 0.079 Antimony 0.26 0.26 Cadmium 2.2 0.48 Arsenic NO 2.4 Chromium 13000 410 Lead 580 26 Copper 34 0.72 Selenium NO 2.9 Nickel 38 0.69 Silver 0.086 0.016 Zinc 260 6.7 Thallium 0.070 J 0.15 Mercury NO 8.1 (m9/Kg); (mg/Kg) (m9/K9) (mg/Kg) 91090229 METHOD 91090229 METHOD 01-$$-001- DETECTION 01-$$-001 DETECTION , PARAMETER XXX-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER )=-01-XX LIMIT Beryllium 2.4 0.082 Antimony 0.19 1 0.28 Cadmium 0.42 J 0.50 Arsenic 3.3 2.5 Chromium 1500 21 Lead 660` 28 Copper 31 0.75 Selenium NO 3.1 Nickel 41. 0.72 Silver 0:11 - 0.017 Zinc 140 7.0 Thallium 0.028 d 0.16 ' Mercury ND 8.5 (m9/K9) .. (mg/Kg) (m9/K9) (mg/Kg) , t PAGE 6 ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Metals 1 (Continued) 91090230 METHOD 91090230 METH00 01-$$-003- DETECTION 01-$$-003- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-OI-XX LIMIT Beryllium 1.9 0.084 Antimony 0.20 J 0.28 Cadmium 0.47 J 0.51 Arsenic 5.8 2.6 Chromium 12000 430 Lead' 170 28 Copper 24'. 0.77 Selenium ND 3.1 Nickel 24 0.74 Silver 0.19 0.017 Zinc 100 7.1 Thallium 0.023 d 0.16 Mercury ND 8.7 (m9/K9) (mg/Kg) (me/I(9) (mg/Kg) ' 91090231 METHOD 91090231 METHOD 01-$$-004= DETECTION 01-$$-004-- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-01-XX" LIMIT Beryllium 1:5 0.083 Antimony 0.083' J 0.28 Cadmium 0.092 J 0.50 Arsenic 3.2: 2.6 Chromium 8200 210 Lead 230' 28 ' Copper 21 ' 0.76 Selenium 1.2 J 3.1 Nickel 35 0.72 Silver 0.023> 0.017 Zinc 63 7.0 Thallium NO 016 Mercury ND 8.5 (m9/K8) (m9/K8) (m9/K9) (mg/Kg) PAGE 7 REPORTNUMBER: 9112-1011 GIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION. 30-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Metals (Continued) 91090234: METHOD 91090234 METHOD 01-$D-001'.- DETECTION 01-$0-001- DETECTION' PARAMETER XXX-01-XX". LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-OI-XX . LIMIT Beryllium 4.3 0.15 Antimony 0.19 J 0.39 Cadmium 5.3 0.93 Arsenic 9.4 < 9.3 Cromium 7100:, 390 Lead 700 100 Copper 140 1.4 Selenium 2.4 J i t Nickel - 44 1.3 Silver 2.5 - 0.062 ' Zinc 740: ) 13 Thallium 1.0 ? 0.58 Mercury NO 31 .(mg/Kg,) (m9M9) (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) . 91090237 METHOD 91090237 :- METHOD 014D-002 DETECTION O140-002- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-OI-XX' LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-01'4X LIMIT Beryllium 4.3 0.15 Antimony 0.34 j 0.38 Cadmium 4.8 0.90 Arsenic t7 0,90 ' Cromium 5306 380 Lead 660 98 Copper 1.30z' 1.4 Selenium 3.1 1.1 ' Nickel 41 1.3 Silver 2.6 0.06 Zinc 12 Thallium 0 25 J 0.56 Mercury ND . 30 (m9/K9) (m9M9) (m9M9) (m9/K9) PAGE 8 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION ' 23-Oct-91 :ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' Metals ' (Continued) 91090238 METHOD 91090238 METHOD 01-$D-003- DETECTION 01-$D-003- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-0I-XXLIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT Beryllium 2.5 0.13 Antimony' 0 22 J Cadmium 47 0 , 0.34 .62 Arsenic 11 Chromium 1000 : 340 Lead0.82 Copper 470 89 97: z 1.2 Selenium 0.42 J 0.99 590 . Nickel 26 12 Silver ' Zinc 1--4 O0.054it Thallium 0.081 d 0.51 Mercury ND 27 (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) 91090239 METHOD 91090239 METHOD ' 01-$W-bol- DETECTION 01-$W-001- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-Ot-XX:; LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT Beryllium NO 0.78 Antimony 0.35 J 2.6 Cadmium NO 4.7 Arsenic 0.a5 J 2.a Chromium 40 20 Lead 42` 3.2 Copper 1.0 d 7.1. Selenium - 0:70> J 2.9 ' Nickel ' NO Zinc 6.8 Silver 0.10 J 0.16 37.0 6.6 Thallium NO 1.5 Mercury NO 0.40 (ug/LI (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) PAGE 9 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 1 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Metals 1 (Continued) 1 91090242 METHOD 91090242 METHOD 01-RB-00T- DETECTION 01-R8-001- DETECTION 1 PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT Beryllium NO 0.78 Antimony 0.90 3 2-6 Cadmium NO - 4.7 Arsenic ND 2.4 , Chromium NO 20 Lead 74 3.2 Copper 3soa 7.1 Selenium NO P.9 Nickel NO, 6.8 Silver 0.10 d 0.16 ' Zinc 3400 6.6 Thaltlum 0.20 J, 1.5 Mercury ND' 0.40 11 (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) 1 91090243:. METHOD 91090243: METHOD 01-$W-002- ! DETECTION 01'-$W-002- DETECTION 1 PARAMETER XXX-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-o1-XX LIMIT Beryllium NO 0.78 Antimony 2.6 1 Cadmium ND 4.7 Arsenic 0.90 3 2.4 Chromium 87 20 LeaO 66 3.2 Copper 9.0 7.1 Selenium NDS 2.9 Nickel NO 6.8 Silver 0:10 d 0.16 Zinc 26::16.6 Thallium 0.25 3 1.5 1 Mercury ND _ 0.40 WWI-) (ug/L) (ug/L)t: (ug/L) 1 1 l 1 1 1 PAGE 10 1 1 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 30-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY 1 ' Metals (Continued) 91090244 METHOD 91090244 METHOD 01-$W-003- DETECTION 01-$W-003- DETECTION PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER ' XXX-Ot-XX LIMIT Beryllium NO 0.78 Antimony 0.75 J 2.6 Cadmium NO - 4.7 Arsenic NO 2.4 Cromium NO 20 Lead 13 3.2 Copper 1.0 J 7.1 Selenium NO 2.9 . Nickel NO 6.8 Silver OtO- d 0.16 Zinc 29 6.6 Thallium 0.20 J 1.5 ' Mercury NO 0.40 (ug/L) (ug/L) (091L) (ug/L) 91090245 METHOD 91090245 . METHOD 01-FB-001 DETECTION 01-FB-001-. DETECTION ' PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT Beryllium NO 0.78 Antimony 1.0. d 2.6 Cadmium NO 4.7 Arsenic ND - 2.4 Cromium ND: 20 Lead 8.t 3.2 Copper 570 7.1 Selenium NO 2.9 Nickel ND , 6.8 Silver 0.10 J 0.16 ' Zinc -250 6.6 Thallium .0.45 J 1.5 Mercury NO 0.40 OWL), (ug/L) (P9/L) ' N9/U 1 PAGE 11 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 C,IBA-GEIGY 'CORPORATION ' 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Miscellaneous Parameters ' 91090239 METHOD 910902a3 METHOD ' 01-sW-001- DETECTION 01-$W-002- DETECTION , PARAMETER XXX-01-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT Chloride 100 3.0 Chloride 98 3.0 (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) 91090244 METHOD 91090245. METHOD , 01-$W-003 DETECTION 01-FB-001 DETECTION , PARAMETER XXX-0I-XX LIMIT PARAMETER XXX-02-XX LIMIT Chloride 79 3.0 Chloride 22 3.0 (mg/L) (mg/L) (mgt-) (mg/L) PAGE 12 , ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23—Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY' 1 QC Section 1 PAGE 13 REPORTNUMBER: 9112-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPOTION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORYRA ' Standard Sources ' All metal and chloride standard stock solutions(1000 mg/1) were purchased , from Inorganic Ventures, Toms River, N.J. Semivolatile standards were purchased from Chem Service and Supelco. Pesticide standards ' were purchased from Supelco. PAGE 14 1 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' SOIL MS: 91090228 MSD: 91090232 Metals MS/MSD Recovery Spike added - OC Limits MS/MSD % % PARAMETER (ug/Kg) Rec. Rec.. RPD RPD % Rec. ' Mercury 500 119 1162.6 7.1 80-121 Beryllium 200 87 88 1.1 7.2 83-115 Cadmium 500 98 99 1.0 5.6 80-117 Chromium 500 91 111 20 7.4 79-115 Copper 500 110 109 0.9 11 86-117 Nickel 500 101 100 1.0 12 76-121 Zinc 500 113 108 4.5 12 79-122 Silver 10 98 103 5.0 11 75-125 Arsenic 40 93 91 2.2 10 75-125 Lead 20 103 104 1.0 13 77-125 ' Antimony 40 88 85 3.5 N/A 75-125 Selenium 40 79 80 1.3 14 75-123 Thallium 40 110 118 7.0 N/A 75-123 Pesticides MS/MSO Recovery Spike added OC Limits MS/MSD % % PARAMETER (ug/Kg) Rec. Rec. RPD RPD %Rec. Lindane 40 134' 380' 96' 15 75-123 Heptachlor 40 116 115 1.0 20 40-131 Aldin 40 1105' 1350' 20 22 40-120 Dieldrin 100 108 64 51' 18 52-126 Endrin 100 30' 510' 49' 21 56-121 DP-DDT 100 143' 370' 27 27 38-127 'Outside OC Limits due to matrix interference. ' PAGE 15 REPORT NUMBER: 9112-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION , 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY ' SEDIMENT , MS: 91090235 MSD: 91090236 , Metals MS/MSD Recovery ' Spike added OC Limits MS/MSD % % PARAMETER (ug/Kg) sec. Rec. RPD RPD % Rec. , Mercury 500 177108 2.5 6.9 80-121 Beryllium 200 97 97 0.0 7.2 83-115 Cadmium 500 84 84 0.0 5.6 80-117 ' Chromium 500 94 98 4.2 7.4 79-115 Copper 500 1 106 104 1.9 11 86-117 Nickel 500 1 99 100 1.0 12 76-121 , Zinc 500 97 104 7.0 12 79-122 Silver - 10 76 84 10 11 75-125 Arsenic 40 76 83 8.8 10 75-125 Lead 20 98 100 2.0 13 77-125 ' Antimony 40 88 91 3.4 NIA 75-125 Selenium 40 94 94 0.0 14 75-t23 Thallium 40 83 81 2.4 N!A 75-123 ' Semivolatiles MS/MSD Recovery , Spike added OC Limits MS/MSD % % ' PARAMETER (ug/Kg) Rec. Rec. RPD RPD % Rec. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 20000 8.0 • 12 ' 40-;-- 23 38-167— Acenaphthene 20000 69 69 0.0 19 31-137 , 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 20000 45 41 9.0 47 28-89 Pyrene 20000 71 77 8.0 36 35-142 N-Nitroso-di-n- propylamine20004 00 43 35 ' 20 38 41-126 , 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20000 ND ' ND • - 27 28-1 Outside OC limits due to matrix interference ' PAGE 16 ' REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CIBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 2IRONMENTALTESTING LABORATORY i WATER MS: 91090240 ' MSD: 91090241 Metals MS/MSD Recovery Spike added oC Limits MS/MSD % % ' PARAMETER (ug/L) Rec. ReC. RPD RPD % Rec. Mercury 2.0 111 115 3.5 7.3 81-121 Beryllium 200 101 99 2.0 7.2 83-115 ' Cadmium 500 93 93 0.0 5.6 80-117 Chromium 500 103 97 6.0 7,4 79-115 Copper 500 100 96 4.1 11 88_117 Nickel 500 93 93 0.0 12 76-121 Zinc 500 104 99 4.9 12 79-122 Silver 10 111 116 4.4 1175-125 Arsenic 40 102 99 U 10 75-125 Lead 20 98 98 00 13 77-125 Antimony 40 116 104 11 N/A 75-125 Selenium 40 79 85 7.3 1 14 1 75-123 Thallium 40 76 80 5.1 N/A 75-123 Chloride MS/MSD Recovery ' Spike added OC Limits MS/MSD % % PARAMETER (mg/L) Rec. Rec. RPD RPD % Rec. ' Chloride 1.0 100 100 0.0 3.0 94-105 ' PAGE 17 REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 jCIBA. GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 [[ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Method Blanks Sample Hg Be Cd Cr Cu Ni No. (ug/9 (ug/l) (ug/0 (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/0 ;;JZn uglq91090227 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 17 91090228 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 , 91090229 ND NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 91090230 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 91090231 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 , 91090232 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 91090234 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 91090235 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 ' 91090236 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 91090237 NO NO 10 50 6.0 NO 117 91090238 NO NO NO 50 6.0 NO 97 , 91090239 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 1 23 11 91090240 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 23 11 91090241 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 23 11 , 91090242 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 23 11 91090243 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 23 11 91090244 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 23 11 , 91090245 NO 3.0 11 81 6.0 23 11 Sample Ag As Pb Sb Se Ti CI No. (ug/0 (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/I) (mg/0 91090227 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA ' 91090228 0.050 ND 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090229 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090230 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA , 91090231 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090232 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090234 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA , 91090235 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090236 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090237 0.050 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA ' 91090238 0.050 1 NO 0.60 1.0 0.20 0.90 NA 91090239 0.10 NO NO 1 0.80 . 0.20 0.40 NO 91090240 0.10 NO NO -0.80 0.20 0.40 NO 91090241 0.10 NO NO 0.80 0.20 0.40 ND 91090242 0.10 NO NO 0.80 0.20 0.40 NA 91090243 0.10 NO NO 0.80 0.20 0.40 NO , 9t 090244 0.10 ND ND 0.80 0.20 0.40 NO 91090245 0.10 ND NO 0.80 0.20 0.40 ND PAGE 18 , ' - REPORTNUMBER: 91E-1011 CUBA-GEIGY CORPORATION 23-Oct-91 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY Semivolatiles ' 91091124 METHOD Extract DETECTION ' PARAMETER Blank LIMIT -------------- Napthalene NO 10 ' Acenaphthylene NO 10 - Acenaphthene ND 10 Phenanthrene NO 10 Anthracene NO 10 Fluoranthene ND 10 Pyrene ND 10 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 10 Chrysene NO 10 Benzo(b)fluoranthens NO 10 Benzo(k)fluoranthens ND 10 Benzo(a)pyrene NO 10 ' Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND10 Dibenz(a,h))anthracene NO, 10 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 10 (ug/L) (ug/L) Surrogates % Recovery OC Limits ' Nitrobenzene-05 119' 23-120% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 101 30-115% Terphenyl-014 153 18-137% ' 'Outside OC Limits Pesticides and PCB's 91091124 METHOD ' Extract DETECTION PARAMETER Blank LIMIT PCB-1260 ND ' 80 ' PCB-1242 NO 34 PCB-1254 ND 120 PCB-1221 NO 660 PCB-1232 ND; 260 PCB-1248 NO 240 PCB-1016 ND 480 (Ug/L)s. (ug/L) Surrogates %Aecovery OC Limits ' Dibutylchlorendate 87 "' 24-154% ' PAGE 19 i=!- %MC GC.jCF�4+MAn!I�.E STGn.il)4G'(j OeCafl , r t by i r , n ( CIF FP [ ,.;Oro .niloho�o e P % Re tat ive Hh..�ncianr.e ' Ion Ab1in7An.:e ea=.e Approortat - M. 7! Criteria Peak Peak Srat j ----- ---h------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ------� 51. 311-60% of ma.. s 199 58 . 94 58 . 94 Ok h8 Less. than ?e of mass h9 0 . 00 ) , ilii 01. 69 ( reference only) 75 . 03 75 . 03 Ok 0 Less than 2% of mass h9 . 02 . :i2 CJI , 127 40-60% of mass 198 49 . 47 49 . 47 ok 197 Less th,An IS of MASS 198 0 . 110 0 . !I10 01, 198 Ba.,e peak , 1130% relative abundance 100 . 00 100 . 00 Ok ' ! 99 5-9% of MASS 198 7. 11 7. L1 Ub 2: 1U-30% of mass 19920 . 96 20 . 96 0k 3h5 Greater than 196 of mess 198 1 . 92 441. 0-100% of mass 44.3 8 . 03 811 . 15 0 442 Greater than 4U% of MASS 193 56 . 63 56 . 63 0• 443 17-23% of mass 442 10 . 02 17. 69 Ok In )ection Date : 09!27!9'1 ' Injection Time : 01 : 27 Data File : >Sn907 ' Scan : 170 SAMPLE [D DATA FILE DATE IIF I;MALYS I S TIME IF AhIAL r S sG 4o Fr �� �_ 9T_ of 4io4oz >S e, 5092/0'9. 09 ax F 9io9.1�r 76L.C, cL? 9��9uar/2 SSG yi/ 0 � 9iv9e� �svGiZ `J.�a7•s 5 a 0 97o9aa3r �Su�� rJ7 ■ 9L9nA'I(, 9lr�gLt 1?7 �s(n 9 /b n 9S1 _ C}/U 90-.-78 5l7 ./ 0 5A 7 APPROVED BY• �!I ' S1] NI, GF IPS 9. 27%9l [N ;TRitl Ln Ii ur1f./UL 1711 HHM HIG tNH - ' rile : ?Sn9UJ 5r,.g r. ip: 171] Retn . t im.? : 9 , 2'2 mi± Int , m/Z I n t M.,_ 0 U H3 ------"'---� . c . ! %2 . 10 H69 I3S , L0 1 . h19 111'. ! 0 3 . '211 2«6 lU-__ I -S 1_ 39 . 11] 5 . 43 9'2 . 011 676 137 . L11 6 . 3 19'2 . 00 ?76 255 . 10 4;' , 316 SII , 10 14. 9115 93 .111 5 . n46 141 . 1.0 2 . 213 193 . 10 l'a6 256 . 111 5t . 111 SH . 93h 9H , 11) 3 . 853 142 . 10 . 715 196 . 10 3 . 08'^ '258 . 1!1 L . Unt 5.2 . 10 2 . H82 99 . 111 3 . 333 147. 10 1 . 1 39 198 . 10 1 in] . 0110 '269 . 111 ?6- Se+ . till 1 . 5219 11-11 . 1U 1 . 88n 1419 . 00 2 . 331 149 . 10 7. 113 273 . 10 1 . 272 S%. 10 4. 597 104.10 HL5 ' 55 .10 1 . 35'2 204.! 0 3 , 118 1'4. 10 3 . 25 6'-2 . 111 , 664 105 , 10 1 . 16H 156 . 211 1 . 6'25 2115 . 10 5 . 198 275 , 1U 211 , 95y 63 . 10 2 . 195 107. '10 14, H73 161 . 10 , 995 206 , 20 20 . n4H '27e-, L11 ^< . 60 - 65 . 1L1 , 8511 11]6 . 10 2 . 178 1h5 . 10 654 207. '10 2 . 705 277. 1n 1 . 39 ? 69 . 110 75 . 1""131 110 . 11] 54. 4116 167, ! 0 4 . 247 211 . II0 n64 296 . '111 5 . '21 74, 10 4. 835 111 . 1!] 4. 582 16H . 10 1 . 81.7 '217, 10 5 . 417 3'23 . 11] 1 . 623 75 .10 H . 4e,2 116 . 10 . 674 1,24. 10 . 122 721 . 10 5 . 412 334 . LU . 83 ' ?6 . t0 9 . 705 117. oil 8 . 778 175 , 10 1 , 423 223 . 10 1 . 143 365 . 10 1 . 9'2L 77, 10 51 . 765 122 . 10 . 894 177. 111 1155 224. 10 12 . nU1 3?2 . 211 . 73. 7r . 10 3 . 214 '123 . 111 1 . 478 1:79 , 10 3 . 283 225 . 10 2 . 827 4'73 , '20 2 . 80'2 ' ?9 . 10 3 . 431 1'27. 10 49 . 472 180 . 10 2 . 202 ?27. 10 3 . 961 441 . 20 8 . 03 ; 911 . n11 2 . 532 1'2H . 00 3 . 639 181 , 10 1 . 031 229 . 10 . 978 442 . 20 5,5 , 633 81 . 10 4. 107 129 . 10 24. 603 185 . 10 1 . 367 244. 10 8 . 495 443 . 20 10 . 021 ' A2 , W, '1 , 022V 13 i1 . 1.11 1 . 765 166 , lli 12 . 065 245 . 21] 97'2 444. 20 . 79c NC, DFTPQ-- CLF Th: 0:.'201:1 f ! I 1 {I t . r 9.0 9.2 . . 9.4 . I rue )bovV� 50 NG GFTrP 9,27i91 114 Scan 1701 a^vim RL $»c^o ENH 9 2c Gula. iVVkt� 30V 4V0 " 69 600. t?? 442 E30 i I -- '55 '\ 400. 129 275 140 j I 02J 68 I`I 100 200 360 400 , 1 I NJ CERTIFIED LAB N 15265 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY C I BA—G E I G Y ROUTE 37 W NC CERTIFIEd LAB N 297 TOMS RIVER,NJ 08754 - AL CERTIFIED LAB N 40490 (908)349-5200 or (800)962-6933 _ OTHER CERTIFICATION: FAX(908)505-9195 PAGE 2 OF SHADED AREA INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT FOR ETL USE ONLY SAMPLING INFORMATION PROJECT CODE: CONTAINER TYPE, SIZE I PRESERVATIVI _ fEl-SAL�1 Sampled b : El501,j Signature:9 :!E DUE DATE: lent Site: b IIAYES, SALEM VA �/� - 0 ' �. - Area/ WKS �i�'(o Title: C�bLOC-415 Company: ABB ENVIR(HIMENTAL Division: zu Q y g p INVOICE TO: d - Phone N: 617 245 - 6006 Ext: Cher a N: QF-IOOOOOS Ql SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME N OF MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST I COMMENTS BOTTLES i io9oZS�3 a ql I 25 ol-$W-ooz-Xx -01 - Ppmet (ovlc�a. 2 ic�9oZ 3 it -$D-OOL- -o - S Z Z � iv oZ�/ IAlj� 0 3w-00 -01 -X PAde C ortcle 2. 02f�S pO LLb�GI -F -001- - -02 rl S i• i CUSTODY SEAL INTACT? N MA REI OUISHED BY 'gnature) PAJE TIME RECEIVED FOR BORAT Y BY:(SlOnature) HDATE � TIME: SAMPLES COLD? N NIA , 10 f SAMPLES PRESERVED? ON M RE EIVED BY:(S1g,alure) REMARKS: HEADSPACE IN VOA'S? Y IN A Q� /7 L` S VOA TEFLON SIDE DOWN? Y N ELINOUISHED BV:(Slgnature) COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY:(Signature) _ - CL u4 KNa ..ERTIFIED LAB M 15265 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LABORATORY C I BA-G E I G Y ROUTE 37 W .0 CERTIFIED LAB M 297 TOMS RIVER,NJ 08754 AL CERTIFIED LAB N 40490 (908)349-5200 or (800)962-6933 OTHER CERTIFICATION: FAX(908)505-9195 PAGE OF Z SHADED AREA INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT FOR ETL USE ONLY SAMPLING INFORMATION PR OJECT CODE: CONTAINER TYPE, SIZE I PRESERVATIVE A UE DALE Sam ed b : KIM �Q.SO ignature: Plant Site:IIAMBL(:R 6 HAYES, SALEM (gArea/ J 9 7G Till.- Com an : ABB ENVIRONMENTAL Division: � S 3 INVOICE TO: Bldg. ; Phone M:(G17 ) 5 - 6006 ExC Charge M: F-100000S 3 SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION0 OF TEST/COMMENTS BOTTLES / ZZ VAL91 ", 2o0 Z 2 4S - OI - t J-oclz- - - M MD - r Z /09 z 9 - 99 -001- /v9oZ3o 1° i0 0 3 ' v< -O - Z /090 :50 1 - #D -OOI -X -oI - X ppme6k 5 Z I ( /o S Z of tD -C>01 -X -01 -X>* M *W - 001 - - o - c Chbt,;dc, 2 I 1 /v o o z ;° -$w-o01-yX - a - J _ (w MsD Z 1 1 -- /oo own�er of -R ooZ CUSTODY SEAL INTACT? N N/A RELINQUISHED 8 :(S nature) ATE TIME RECEIVED FOR LA 0RATO Y BY:(Signature) DATE: SAMPLES COLD? ���I- TIME: ,`8N NIA V�+lure) ti Q/�{ r� ' SAMPLES PRESERVED? 1�N N/A RECEIVED BY:{Sipnalure) REMARKS: - HEADSPACEINVOA'S? Y N/A E E ILL- 29 VOA TEFLON SIDci E DOWN? Y NI ELINQUISHEO BY:(Signalure) COMMENTS: DIAPL(CA"TE FOIL V\AlR_IX jnD(APLICATE - RECEIVED BY:(Sipnature) ._ N Wrl Salo = �rSo�I[�S / EX �'NIb X708, (cl 'I'P) EXSOG I n , lar( - - - �s• .. .- LIGLAID = CX7--d 71) 1? f xii,c V,(,�• > > / 1 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 261 Commercial Street PO Box 7050 Portland, ME 04112 ' CALIFORNIA MICHIGAN ' 4765 Calle Quetzal 39255 Country Club Drive Camarillo, CA 93012 Farmington Hills, MI 48331 t NEW JERSEY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABB Environmental Services, Inc. 140016th St.,NW 60 Walnut Center, 2nd Floor Suite 720 Clark,NJ 07066 Washington, DC 20036 Sanitec Wayne Interchange Plaza If FLORIDA 155 Route 46 West 2571 Executive Center 3rd Floor Circle East, Suite 100 Wayne, NJ 07470 Tallahassee, FL 32301 TENNESSEE " 683 Emory Valley Road 575 South US Highway#1 Suite C Suite 401 Oak Ridge,TN 37830 Juno Beach, FL 33408 ABB-ES EUROPE MASSACHUSETTS Abraham-Lincoln Strasse 1 Corporate Place 128 Postfach 4047+4049 107 Audubon Road D-6200 Wiesbaden Wakefield, Massachusetts 01880 Federal Republic of Germany LegalAfloe Legal Notice !L......,. 1 CITY OF SALEM + CONSERVATION COMMISSION Il NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF APPLICABILITY E On Thursday, March 14, 1991 at 7:00 p.m., the - Salem Conservation Commission will discuss a Determination of Applicability, of the Wetlands it Protection Act,Massachusetts General Laws Chap- 1 ter 131, Section 40. Van Waters and Rogers are 1` requesting the determination for soil and water it testing on lots 117, 118& 119 Colonial Road.The t meeting will be held at One Salem Green,Second . Floor Conference Room. March 9, 1991 FR.DuffCollinsoject Manager vironmental Sciences BB Environmental Services,Inc. outhern New England Division orporate Place 128 107 Audubon Road �1► �¶'�(¶� Wakefield Massachusetts 01880 Ijlk�� Lp��✓pV� Tel:(617)245-6606 MEA BROWN BWERI FAX:(617)246-5060 Van Waters 6 Rogers Inc. subsidiary of Umvar ;CKmCM DONALD M.BLACK,PH.O. REGUp L REGULATORY MANAGER NORTMERNREGION 11 HORTON LANE X2031 S66-5613 NEW CANAAN,CT OB O FAX[203)866-4939 I QUALITY POLICY • We, the employees, are committed to knowing and conforming to the requirements j _ of our customers and each other. We will -� • - provide defect-free products and services the first time,every time. 310 CMR 10.99 Foran 1 DEP File No. V a_ (to be provioatl by DEP) . .rlCity lovm SATYM - Commonwealth of Massachusetts ADoi[can;VAN WATERS & ROGERS Request for a Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131 , §40 1. I,the undersigned, hereby request that the City of Salem Conservation Commission make a determination as to whether the area, described below, or work to be performed on said area,also described below,is subject to the jurisdiction of the Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131,§40. 2. The area is described as follows. (Use maps or plans, if necessary, to provide a description and the location of the area subject to this request.) Location: Street Address Colonial Road Lot Number: 117, 118, 119 3. The work in said area is described below. (Use additional paper, if necessary, to describe the proposed work.) See Attachment 1 — Project Narrative for the description of the proposed work. 1'•1 Effective 11110/89 4. The owner(s)of the area,if not the person making this request, fias been given written notification of this request on (dale) The name(s)and address(es)of the owner(s): Van Waters 6 Rogers Colonial Road Salem, Massachusetts 5. 1 have filed a complete copy of this request with the appropriate regional office of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection March 7 1991 (date) DEP Northeast Regional Office DEP Southeast Regional Office 5 Commonwealth Avenue Lakeville Hospital Woburn, MA 01801, Route 105 Lakeville, MA 02347 DEP Central Regional Office 75 Grove Street DEP Western Regional Office Worcester, MA 01605 State House West, 4th Floor 436 Dwight Street Springfield, MA 01103 6. I understand that notification of this request will be placed in a local newspaper at my expense in accor- dance with Section 10.05(3)(b)1 of the regulations by the Conservation commission and that I will be billed accordingly. Signature a^ Name t�Ru►- �. rxuER, P.�. Address _6II ENVIR00MENTAI SDROXES Tel. 617 ays -(-6Db ID7 Atiareo„ ROA9 WAx5FIELV) 01380 12 ATTACHMENT 1 - PROJECT NARRATIVE Introduction The Hamblet&Hayes Co.facility is located at Colonial Road in Salem, Massachusetts (Figure 1). According to records at the City of Salem Assessors Office,the Site is comprised by three parcels which are currently owned by Hamblet & Hayes Co., a subsidiary of Van Waters and Rogers, Inc. (VWR) (Figure 2). The Hamblet & Hayes Co. Colonial Road facility (the Site) was listed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) as a Location to be Investigated (LTBI) in the MADEP List of Confirmed Sites and Locations to Be Investigated issued in March 1990 and dated January 15, 1990. A Notice of Responsibility letter (dated September 20, 1989) was issued by the MADEP in response to a purported release of methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) from an underground storage tank at the Site on February 22, 1989. Tank inventory records, results of tank tightness testing and other observations indicate that the sudden disappearance of the MEK was likely a result of theft and not a release from the tank to the environment. However, the letter from MADEP indicates the Site would be included on the List to be Investigated (LTBI), and presents regulatory requirements requiring the completion of a Preliminary Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation. ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES) will be conducting the Phase I field investigation in accordance with MADEP requirements as presented in the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP; 310 CMR 40.000). Site Description The property under investigation encompasses approximately 4.36 acres at the eastern end of Colonial Road in Salem, Massachusetts(Figure 2). The Site is located in a small commercial/industrial complex consisting of industrial,warehouse, and office facilities. The Site is located in an area zoned for industrial use. There are several buildings presently located at the Site including an office building, a laboratory building, a manufacturing building, and several storage buildings. The Site is surrounded by an area of mixed land use (Figure 2) and is bordered directly to the east, north, and west by a tidally influenced drainage basin locally identified as Mill Pond or the South River. Portions of this land area are owned by the New England Power Company. A large railroad yard abuts the Site to the southeast The railroad yard is also adjacent to the opposite side of Mill Pond beyond the eastern margin of the Site. A commercial warehouse and office facilities are located directly south and southwest of the Site. Access to and egress from the Site is provided by Colonial Road, east of the intersection of Colonial Road and Jefferson Avenue (Figure 2). Access to the entire Site is restricted by a chain link fencing topped with barbed wire and to the north by Mill Pond (Figure 3). There are three gates into the facility: the main gate located adjacent to the main office Building A; the rear gate located adjacent to Building K; and a gate located where a railroad spur enters the Site from the railroad yard southeast of the Site. Visitor parking is provided by marked spaces directly west of the main office building near the main gate to the facility. Almost all of the Site is currently paved. Figure 3 illustrates the limits of pavement at the Site. The northern and northeastern margins of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond are not paved. Site topography (Figure 3) is generally flat at an elevation of approximately 10 to 12 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). Topography slopes sharply downward at the perimeter of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond, to an elevation of approximately 5 feet NGVD or less. An ABB-ES senior biologist has conducted a preliminary identification of vegetation within the pond, the banks of the pond, and within the 100-foot buffer zone. The preliminary listing is presented on Table 1. The approximate location of the buffer zone is indicated on Figure 3. A wetlands walkover and receptor survey was conducted by ABB-ES personnel on 6 March 1991 to characterize the extent of wetland habitat and types of ecological receptors likely to occur in the vicinity of the site. Plant species were identified during the site visit and signs of wildfrfe activity noted. A list of the plant species observed is presented in Table 1. Common reed (Phragmites australis) produces an extensive fringing border around Mill Pond in the vicinity of the site. This population is very dense and effectively excludes other plant species, with the exception of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). In the relatively drier areas above the pond, thickets of the dominant staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) are found associated with scattered choke cherry (Prunus virginiana),apple(Pyrus malus),and hawthorn(Crataegus sp.). Weedy species(including various members of the Compositae) and Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) occur in the waste fill areas surrounding the parking lot Signs of wildlife were evident during the site visit Gulls apparently frequent Mill Pond, and the sumac thickets provide suitable habitat for various songbirds. Several narrow animal trails, burrow holes and signs of frass indicate that rodents occur in the wetland areas. Muskrats, which will feed on reed tubers, may be also be present, although the species prefers cattails and habitat with more stable water levels. Although a benthic macroinvertebrate survey was not conducted, invertebrate fauna in the tidal muds associated with Mill Pond may be numerous enough to support various amphibians and foraging birds. A few minnows and aquatic beetles were observed in Mill Pond. Field Investigation The proposed field investigation will consist of several interrelated components designed to maximize information gathering and data acquisition to meet Phase I objectives. There will be three major components of the investigation: (1) evaluation of groundwater quality; (2) groundwater flow analysis; and (3) evaluation of surface water and sediment quality. To meet these objectives, ABB-ES will advance soil borings and install groundwater monitoring wells, install groundwater piezometers and surface water stakes, and collect surface water and sediment samples from Mill Pond. Refer to Figure 3 for proposed sampling locations. The groundwater quality investigation will involve the advancement of several shallow soil borings, the collection and characterization of soil samples, installation of monitoring wells in the new soil borings, and the collection and laboratory analysis of groundwater samples from the newly installed and pre-existing monitoring wells. Soil borings will be drilled using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig. Borings will be advanced utilizing 4.5-inch-ID, hollow-stem augers. Standard penetration tests yielding split-spoon samples will be conducted continuously from the surface to a depth of approximately 5 feet below the water table. Monitoring wells will be installed in each soil boring such that well screen intervals are set to intercept the water table. Monitoring wells will be constructed of 2-inch-diameter, flush-threaded, Schedule 40 PVC well screens and riser pipe. The screened section will have 0.010-inch-wide, machine-slotted openings and will be no more than 10 feet in length. The position and length of the screen at each boring location will depend on geology and the depth to groundwater encountered during drilling. Three boring/well installations will be performed within the 100-foot buffer zone. Each of these locations is away from the bank slope adjacent to the pond. The groundwater flow evaluation will involve installation of three piezometer pairs and two surface water stakes and performance of an elevation survey of each of the newly installed depth to groundwater/surface water observation points. Depth to water measurements will be taken at all locations during one measurement round. Subsequent depth to water measurements will be performed at selected locations at several time intervals within one tidal cycle. The surface water stakes and piezometers will be installed in Mill Pond. Surface water stakes will be constructed of hard oak wood, approximately six to eight feet long and approximately 0.5 inches square. Each stake will be driven approximately three feet into the Pond. Piezometers will be constructed of 3/4-inch ID, PVC or steel pipe, with a 6 to 9 inch slotted section at the base. The base will be capped and the slotted interval wrapped with geotechnical filter fabric to prevent infiltration of silt or Gay into the piezometers. Piezometers will be steam cleaned prior to installation. Shallow piezometers will be driven to a depth of approximately three feet below the sediment bottom surface. Deep piezometers will be driven approximately six feet below the sediment bottom surface. Surface water samples will be collected at a point two-thirds of the distance above the bottom surface to prevent collection of any waters directly from either the sediment/water interface or the water/air interface. Care will be taken to ensure that upstream disturbances do not cause the collection of unrepresentative samples. The order of sample collection will be from downstream locations toward upstream locations. Sediment samples from below the surface water bodies will be collected with a non-contaminating sediment grab or core sampler. The field investigation will be performed during a time period of approximately two weeks. The drilling and monitoring well installation adjacent to Mill Pond will be performed during the course of one day. The surface water stake and piezometer installation will be performed during the course of one day. Surface water samples and sediment samples will be collected during the course of one day. The results of the proposed investigation will be submitted to the MADEP to meet the requirements of the Notice of Responsibility and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan for the Phase I investigation. The results should provide an initial understanding of the soil, groundwater, sediment and surface water quality at and adjacent to the Site so that a determination of the potential impact of site and/or surrounding property use to environmental conditions and the need for further investigatory actions can be evaluated. pr11 )f \r rstJ n Ph� Ce M� l -a°1 .� , •. r?� ok �' _ N \ 'fenoll 60 L✓ I .� y �� A Y \�\'� //uy.� F1d[ :'Rs / �^ "✓ �E +��r. rae �Fi e � �.ZZZ leeriery� Crr'Sherd rt �_. �, �".•j'g , i/ 4 E' / `Z '- �___. �( E sO���Kt'.' qF' '�o✓� �' '. �'.' B� / w� `"L ��--_=tom' i\ 1 �1,_��,,,� ° Mo ur,ef/ 4a 'ice f" al -''Sehj •f IIp,',q ....i �45'�\Z4'� Az. 1`�.• , �\ BMi ^ Cly a AOY� � q� et 6H.L� 1 1 r� PG�41 / l �F�FI �• ^� ' es©. /,,... alem /,$�,c�, 9' �.`° � '•�-9H Pak l �. Hall 711-rat ktstonc 5 Ec A ' Asa a� 1 fry . �:\ - \' blea¢Au,l�_T r^ `) �,whcer c _ . t i l I> v t pOnr! 11 - �t Tanya v A r�r. , �r 1 If rl long Pt - � lw t4 � ` n• �...< 0._ , �. � ° _ r a> +. �� � 7� � �°¢7TnKT C,/ /� ))�O$ c� Salbm /� L�. �l .� $ub5ta �,��\ •��MASD�ta + 1- I"1'N ��II tEP'CfY 1,?stlTEr SITE �a \. "-`\�'v �„�•.. `� '�' � � s° .l � I 5 1 Lib �"i C^s- r ... rv5 - I S` 3` R\sr• lea •'r Pit keri�g ` if o� _t-.v 40 \ �.N olYCom(s\e p / a �,.aL ) J4t[HI2 �T fix, ,4 \ EE �\1, =rux4a.4 ,� rG LAAW MRK t r/ 1 . yf � v A.;5 Duprt• o , � "' ']Yfeadawl / 1/ Imo• � "' 1 a, tN'. ' �/ i7�10 �\ � 0//_` r/ \' J >° vl�\Cf. a.• %1%`.��,+�f��C�_y11 17..' / SW RCE:U.S.G..TOPOGRAPHIC 7.s WNUTE SERIES SALEM,MA 1979 LYNN•MA 1970 QUADRANGLE LOCATION FIGURE 1 0 2,000 4,000 SITE LOCATION HAMBLET AND HAYES FACILITY SCALE FEET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , r O N 1 1 1 LEGEND: 1 Q BUILDING 1 PROPERTY LINE 1 I RAILROAD TRACK El 1 r , f ` — WETLAND 11 �� ® POWERLINES AND lss u i ez� iii ` / SUPPORT macaw sus ., r e/e i '' MILL POND � SITE AREA (LOT 117 NAMBLET I `A AND HAVES CO.; LOT 118,118 THE iuTne , 1 KIRTO CORP.) ..mA1sI,RE b f I NE mYpq> < I 1 ,A1MFA b 3 I ! F I S �a 1 r � fY� ioY y. LOi tU y. 1 'hi.. �`ClDi ttiE n� C BO."MINNE 0 RAILROAD Is ^ • — �'� it>�RRVFi y,0. M .nC� NE IONEN J NA CRs"'a orn. �9 WTI. WTI. ¢EtER Hlmruro x,u conv. ' vAwousrFNum .. WTI. U WT. MAg \ ¢aTRIG FAIBIFM MMATERMDERE! 0 200 400 FIGURE 2 SCALE FEET(APPROX) PROPERTY OWNERSHIP PLAN NOTM:1)PLAN DERIVED FROM CITY OF SALEM ASSESSORS MAP HAMBLET AND HAYES FACILITY No.RI DATED 1988. 2)ALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PLAN FEATURES SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS AND PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROMMATE ONLY. ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC 6""IA/2 X_ ' x- ' -x —x 100 FOOT BUFFER ZONE RA RD D ID CVLVEPT TO Bw/BO] 00 STAXE •ID OONDurt 97 Mort or �L MILLPOND wlw' �PnvEUEM z.,_ 11 C) 7Do,. 2 ABB-S ew/eae m esa >}J aLOG x _ _ _ _10.6_ - _ .10.7 ABB-6 11 • BLMI z � ' asA ssa ABB-3 L \ MMTOF BLDG.J x\ PAVEMW BLCG.G i -� ABB-2 i i 114414- -1-144iiiiii-H4444444-1i44i4i44444-H-Iii-1444444.14444444444-144-444444444444444444 i aL.D NLAw LL2 ruBPonosiDixc xuweuz v±m—__._°l as ` i I ,8.6 OLW.E, BIW.L G Y I REM L WN6 14tH 7� ATE BW leba �XIA WFLL6 000 WX> •17 G 000 µaH2 �NU WEIII L HLA E L3 t + Lu Mb ABB-11 \\ 11 1 CONCRETE PAD i 11 ABBE wnr SUPPLY LL ' WEIL � _ N4Na G 6.0 x x' x �=��'� 0UM101lgM O OLW.K %_ x 1.3 OLOC O i x' 100 FOOT eLoo.n ABB-7 BUFFER ZONE erAxE ID• Mnix A `^ .x Bw/BO+ z � �/����1�� x„ x LEGEND: 11 ABB PROPOSED MONITORING WELL / �rs ABB PROPOSED PIEZOMETER LOCATION •• ABB PROPOSED SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE 0 80 160 MEMO I •• • SURFACE WATER STAKE HLA MONITORING FEETNG WELL FIGURE 3 HLA SqL BORING "°'EB FIELD INVESTIGATION LOCATION PLAN 1)PLAN DERIVED FROM HAMBLET 8 HAVES CO. O EXISTING H&H OBSERVATION WELL Hu(100BO�E00RDS.SAMPLING LOCATIONS AFTER PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION —11—APPROXIMATE 11 FOOT ELEVATION R) FEATURES ALL AN ANMPUNGSIONTS AREE HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY FEATURES AND SAMPLING PgNTS ARE CONTOUR APPROXIMATE ONLY. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS --1.3-- APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF BANK ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. TABLE 1 LIST OF PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED DURING SITE VISIT, 6 MARCH 1991 HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Relative Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Achillea millefolium Yarrow Scattered in well-drained areas Asclepias syriaca Common milkweed Scattered in well-drained areas Betula papyrifera White birch Scattered Celastrus scandens Bittersweet Occasional Crataegus sp. Hawthorne Occasional Erigeron canadensis Horseweed Scattered in well-drained areas Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife Common Phragmites australls Common reed Dominant Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Common in well-drained areas Prunus virginiana Choke cherry Occasional Pyrus malus Apple Occasional Quercus alba White oak Occasional Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac Common Rosa sp. Wild rose Common Rubus sp. Bramble Common Solidago sp. Goldenrod Scattered in well-drained areas Van Waters & Rogers Inc. COLONIAL ROAD P.O. BOX 730 SALEM, MA 01970 subsidiary of Univar PHONE [508] 745-3700 FAX [508] 745-5875 February 12, 19-01 Ms. Ju1i Relmenschneider RECEIVED Conservation Committee Planning Department FEB 14 1992 CITY OF SALEM 1 Salem Green SALEM PIANK�IIIG DEPT. Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Reference: Phase I Limited Site Investigation Report Hamblet & Hayes Facility Colonial Road Salem, Massachusetts Dear Ms. Relmenschneider: Enclosed is a copy of the Phase I Limited Site Investigation Report (LSI) for the above-referenced facility that was submitted to the State of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MDEP) on January 15, 1992. The LSI was prepared by ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES), in compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP). As the LSI indicates, ABB-ES was engaged by the CIBA-GEIGY Corporation (CIBA-GEIGY), the former owner of the stock of Hamblet & Hayes, to perform the LSI. CIBA-GEIGY retain ABB-ES to perform this work pursuant to the terms of an agreement for the sale and purchase of Hamblet & Hayes with Van Waters & Rogers Inc. (VW&R), the current owner of the stock of Hamblet & Hayes. In brief, the results of the LSI indicates that certain releases of hazardous materials have occurred at the facility. However, ABB-ES concluded that no imminent hazard exists at the facility. ABB-ES also prepared an Interim Site Classification form which concludes that the facility should be considered a Non-Priority Site under the MCP; the completed form is included in the LSI. A non- priority classification indicates that the releases at the site do not warrant a sufficient level of public concern so as to necessitate MDEP oversight of future response actions. Therefore, Hamblet & Hayes has applied for a Waiver of Approvals pursuant to 310CMR 40.537. Approval of the waiver application would allow investigation and necessary response activities to proceed expeditiously under the direction of a licensed professional engineer. However, all response actions will still comply with all applicable regulations. •T i � a Ms. Juli Relmenschneider -2- February 12, 1992 If you or your staff have any general questions or would like to meet and discuss the contents of the LSI or Interim Site Classification, please do not hesitate to contact me at (508)745-3700. However, technical questions on the LSI should be directed to either Ms. Bessie Lee or Mr. Wayne Grotheer of VW&R. Their telephone numbers are (408) 435-8700 and (206)889-3470, respectively. Voice mail messages can also be left for Ms. Lee and Mr. Grotheer at (800)284-6264. Ver truly yours �� William F. Collins, Jr. WFC:amt New England Area Manager Enclosure cc: Bessie Lee/VW&R, San Jose Wayne Grotheer/VW&R, Kirkland CITY OF SALEM, MA FAX COVER LETTER FAX (508) 744-5918 DATE: TlMF-- 9'D 57 FROM: VI Lfi —� SPf✓G�//0J7 C07`i!�//SS/G2 ) DEPT: TO: SUBJECT: Le GI a L ac&&, COMMENTS: WE ARE TRANSMITTING THIS AND _� PAGES (S). IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS, PLEASE CALL US AT 7 jox ;�?// . wr J, 1 L Seeg��- ` � ° / i �✓ t�Kl/ ao's .. '� �y6� I o. iis- C o �'( 1 +ANI r FTh o vat a l a Trdat 8' r' ¢ v ur �� �� �, � arvuoo�� r -c .+ s ' of ea yt! �f F ••:® �I 4 <o •.�11a.Sout. ..��� ♦ )L Pal 'r } o ,ft` alem\ �� .' • �( �. _P lHj',' ° �lYl' '� BHS ^'�'\.,' omm� •1§ �/�.aSaem Ye roma) Wh}?�...J Itt .� /��� �����✓ 1 � �� �A. \ 1 �( �� n, �/ n e�,�srP,� •-'aWhi'rf M� BrIOIO W tet OI 1 I s Pa (� 0 Long Pt' ,,n 7.iN n:i cKs , (ove /_ r ° l, ✓_— - . . \\C J�r Sarem fes-/, 1 —� _ 4 / /�� yJ �' _ Sobsta � �� •ts-MiASo taGi.}�i 1'�IIPalmer W _ l ' t 41 rf�� � ` � 1 ♦� - 2 X. •`6 '..J H i°i � � � ,�r� .. \ ¢y /f yam\ 6. J�. ' � on �-t ♦ o plc o � r SOURCE:U.S.G.S.TOPOGRAPHIC 7.5 MNUTE SERIES SALEµMA 1979 LYNN,MA 1970 QUADRANGLE LOCATION - FIGURE 1-1- 0 2,000 4,000 SITE LOCATION HAMBLET AND HAYES FACILITY SCALE FEET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. / ' O N D ' / / I LEGEND. BUILDING i PROPERTY LINE / t RAILROAD TRACK WETLAND wnu / is t `� ® POWERLINES AND a0/de. ^t ♦ / SUPPORT IxuuuD 9D9 0:� � ��. MILLPOND �` 517E AREA r (LOT 117 HAMBLET AND HAYES CO.; ;n,. k '; `� LOT 110,110 THE wT116 :: e�vv gRTO CORP.) TIlU9 FU9Ni0R6 OIO e,e »v / n:Non»F / I WWFA "%yin` I l I 1 � t w:`:.o rokrvy ' ♦ C Ym",.a..x.. I t wT x WTtf�`O / 1 .. :�1]Slic F <3` .<? `".TDM h,• , T f vn�� a.� �>,.ex pmox AwwxF +vim` : .»... , e KE ✓ WTI'. wTux LOT 1. I.m 610.. ..RMT....DORV. VAMOWTBIN119 LOT 1. V wT. IDMTq.h YW9 \ 6FGTNC G>FIIF]If MWAn R®DF 99 0 200 400 FIGURE 2-1 SCALE FEET(APPROX) PROPERTY OWNERSHIP PLAN NOTES:1)PLAN DERIVED FROM CITY OF SALEM ASSESSORS MAP HAMBLET AND HAYES FACILITY No.24 DATED 1080. 2)ALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PLAN FEATURES - SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS AND PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROMMATE ONLY. 6100-0IA/2 ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC IiYrrl > >r� 1iMi lilimll IIiIIINIII » trail 11111EPfr ■rm � r..d Y� x _X - RVLF D 9W 1161 � YAPU m qn STAGE BE QMllai W X CavERT TO %•� �_X.� _ EmTH'WER x_ mNDur X MILL POND GALE 00 ABed 0 �O I ABB-6ELoc H a BLDG i T X\ nllae m elm.J __ x\ 8100 O � ABBY 444 H4H44444Hi{iH4f44iiiii44itHiiii444444ii H 6444444+44;44444444444444444 BLDG IBAwEu] RVLROABSImNG N,A WFLLI WNi Qi x QI LMLO BLOO.E BIW.I REAR RXNO WHT4� GTE WE�y boo WN1 �"Yy i VOO� WN] x WEILI Y 00 +Huweue ABB-1 I I fA1LRETE RAD � WATER /1iYI sUVVLY g AB94 WELL T _ wxs p Y % %l:i:::: BlxIOiXGM O BLDG K 1' _ X-- _ x BLDG B i X emc♦ A8B7 RAGE m 4NN TMIIW %-GTE �x Y ,.X—G LE GEND: T ABB PROPOSED MONITORING WELL _ 00T ABB PROPOSED PIEZOMETER LOCATION ABB PROPOSED SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE 0 BO 160 • SURFACE WATER STAKE IIIJ SCALE FEET NLA MONITORING WELL NLA SOIL BORING NOTES: FIGURE 4-1 u PUN DERWED FROM NAMBLET a NATES CO. FIELD INVESTIGATION LOCATION PLAN O EMSTINGNaNOBSERVATIONWELL NLAA«ITQ90)RECORDS.SAMPL1NCLOCA7IONSAFTER PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION Y) ALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF SITE FEATURES AND SAMPLING POINTS ARE HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY APPROXIMATE ONLY. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. 3. The work described below, which includes all/part of the work described in your request, is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations,and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. This Determination is negative: 1 . G The area described in your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. 2. The work described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act, but will not remove. fill, dredge,or alter that area.Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 3, r, The work described in your request is within the Buffer Zone, as defined in the regulations, but will not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 4. The area described in your request is Subject to Protection Under the Act. but since the work described therein meets the requirements for the following exemption,as specified in the Act and the regulations, no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by the Department of Environmental Protection. Signature On this day of 19 , before me personally appeared , to me known to be the person described in, and who executed,the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he/she executed the Same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires This Superseding Determination does not relieve the applicant from complying with all other applicable federal,state or local statutes. Ordinances.by-laws or regulations.This Superseding Determination Shall be valid for three years from the Cate of issuance. The applicant,the owner,any person aggrieved by the Superseding Determination,any owner of lana Spotting the land upon which the proposed work is to be cone,or any len persons pursuant to G.L c.30A§10A.are hereby notified of their right to request an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to G.L.c.30A. §10,providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department.with me appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmural Folin as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7)within ten days from the date of issuance of this Superseding DetennF nation,and is addressed 10:Docket Clerk.Office of General Counsel.Department of Environmental Protection,One winter Street.Boston, MA 02108.A copy of the reauest shall at the Same time be sent by certified mall or fend oelivery to the conservation Commission,the applicant.ano any other party. A Notice of Claim for an AOWacalory Hearing snail comply with the Department s Rules for Aaludlcalory Proceeamgs.310 CMR 1.01(6).and shall contain the following information: lel the DEP wetlands File Numoer,name of the applicant,and address of the protect. (b) the comolete name,address and telephone number of the parry filing the request.and.if represented by counsel.the name and address of the attomey: (0) the names and addresses of all other parties.it known: - (d) a clear an0 concise statement of(t)the facts which are grounds for the proceeomg.(2)the objections to this$uerseamg Deter• minaiipn,mcivaing soecalcaily ine manner in which it is ailegea IO be inconsistent with the Deoanment-s wetlands Regulations. (310 CMP 10.001 anc(3)the relief sought through the aCluaicatory nearing,including Specifically the changes desired in the Suoersedmg Determination: lel a statement that a cosy of the request has been sent to the applicant.the conservation commission and each other party or feore. sentative of such Party,it known_ Failure to submit all necessary information may result in a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Aolucicatofy Hearing. 2.2B ttd UNITED STATES POST 'EF VICECt '•"""'"^ .e>a••^""^�^w OFFICIAL BUS] 9SS SENDER INSTRU N Print your name,address a ZIPS616 in the space below. • Complete items 1.2,3,and 4 on the U.S.NUUL reverse. p • Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. PENALTY FOR PRIVATE • Endorse article "Return Receipt USE, $300 Requested" adjacent to number. RETURN Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Cade in the space below. TO w /ems JPl k ���cul r� ) /l c °ham, - P �Sa Le . AU o/,?20 • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return recei t fee will rovide ou the name of the erson delivered to and the date of deliver . For additional tees the allowing services are avai able. on sult postmaster or Tees an c eck box es or additional service(s)requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Extra charge) (Extra charge) 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number deo /c' 11.113 /a4K .1?_ )0 2 o S 4:20I/e n A"4�f -5 K LJf,�' -1 r Type of Service: )( /_�0��J� f _10� ✓ ED Registered 11 Insured /" bit Certified COD �J ea� cza./q� C 7 Q�j�[//� LEl Mail E] Return Receipt /(l for Merchandise Always obtain signature of addressee ELIVERED. 5. Signatu e — AddresseeRE s ddress (ONLY if X 11,.,(r 4th ( _ ` requested and fee paid) 6. Signature — Agent _ 1991 X 7. Date of D l4MY i SALEM I UNNING DEPT. PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 ♦U.S.G.P.O.1989.238-815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT 310 CMR 10.99 Form 1 DEP File No. ' p (Io be Provioed by DEP) . GICny'lowc SALEM _ Commonwealth VAN WATERS & ROGERS 3; o1 Massachusetts Avoi can: Request for a Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131 , §40 1. I,the undersigned, hereby request that the City of Salem Conservation Commission make a determination as to whether the area, described below, or work to be performed on said area,also described below,is subject to the jurisdiction of the Wetiands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131,§40. 2. The area is described as follows. (Use maps or plans, if necessary, to provide a description and the location of the area subject to this request) Location: Street Address Colonial Road Lot Number: 117, 118, 119 3. The work in said area is described below. (Use additional paper, if necessary, to describe the proposed work.) See Attachment 1 — Project Narrative for the description of the proposed work. 1.1 Effective 11/10/89 4. The owner(s)of the area,if not the person making this request, has been given written notification of this request on (date) The name(s)and address(es)of the owner(s): Van Waters & Rogers Colonial Road Salem, Massachusetts 5. 1 have filed a complete copy of this request with the appropriate regional office of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection March 7 1991 (date) DEP Northeast Regional Office DEP Southeast Regional Office 5 Commonwealth Avenue Lakeville Hospital Woburn, MA 01601, Route 105 Lakeville, MA 02347 DEP Central Regional Office 75 Grove Street DEP Western Regional Office Worcester, MA 01605 State House West, 4th Floor 436 Dwight Street Springfield, MA 01103 6. 1 understand that notification of this request will be placed in a local newspaper at my expense in accor- dance with Section 10.05(3)(b)1 of the regulations by the Conservation Commission and that I will be billed accordingly. ' � Signature c>^ Name Address A66 ENytRoOMEn1TAL SER�KES Tel. 617 2y� -�6D6 ID7 A"vuoou RcA9 WAKE FIFI.O, NSA DI SSD 12 ATTACHMENT 1 - PROJECT NARRATIVE Introduction The Hamblet&Hayes Co.facility Is located at Colonial Road in Salem, Massachusetts (Figure 1). According to records at the City of Salem Assessors Office,the Site is comprised by three parcels which are currently owned by Hamblet & Hayes Co., a subsidiary of Van Waters and Rogers, Inc. (VWR) (Figure 2). The Hamblet & Hayes Co. Colonial Road facility (the Site) was listed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) as a Location to be Investigated (LTBI) in the MADEP List of Confirmed . Sites and Locations to Be Investigated issued in March 1990 and dated January 15, 1990. A Notice of Responsibility letter (dated September 20, 1989) was issued by the MADEP in response to a purported release of methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) from an underground storage tank at the Site on February 22, 1989. Tank inventory records, results of tank tightness testing and other observations indicate that the sudden disappearance of the MEK was likely a result of theft and not a release from the tank to the environment. However, the letter from MADEP indicates the Site would be included on the List to be Investigated (LTBI), and presents regulatory requirements requiring the completion of a Preliminary Assessment and Phase I - Limited Site Investigation. ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES) will be conducting the Phase I field investigation in accordance with MADEP requirements as presented in the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP; 310 CMR 40.000). Site Description The property under investigation encompasses approximately 4.36 acres at the eastern end of Colonial Road in Salem, Massachusetts(Figure 2). The Site is located in a small commercial/industrial complex consisting of industrial,warehouse, and office facilities. The Site is located in an area zoned for industrial use. There are several buildings presently located at the Site including an office building, a laboratory building, a manufacturing building, and several storage buildings. The Site is surrounded by an area of mixed land use (Figure 2) and is bordered directly to the east, north, and west by a tidally influenced drainage basin locally Identified as Mill Pond or the South River. Portions of this land area are owned by the New England Power Company. A large railroad yard abuts the Site to the southeast. The railroad yard is also adjacent to the opposite side of Mill Pond beyond the eastern margin of the Site. A commercial warehouse and office facilities are located directly south and southwest of the Site. Access to and egress from the Site is provided by Colonial Road, east of the intersection of Colonial Road and Jefferson Avenue (Figure 2). Access to the entire Site is restricted by a chain link fencing topped with barbed wire and to the north by Mill Pond (Figure 3). There are three gates into the facility: the main gate located adjacent to the main office Building A; the rear gate located adjacent to Building K; and a gate located where a railroad spur enters the Site from the railroad yard southeast of the Site. Visitor parking is provided by marked spaces directly west of the main office building near the main gate to the facility. Almost all of the Site is currently paved. Figure 3 illustrates the limits of pavement at the Site. The northern and northeastern margins of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond are not paved. Site topography (Figure 3) is generally flat at an elevation of approximately 10 to 12 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). Topography slopes sharply downward at the perimeter of the Site adjacent to Mill Pond, to an elevation of approximately 5 feet NGVD or less. An ABB-ES senior biologist has conducted a preliminary identification of vegetation within the pond, the banks of the pond, and within the 100-foot buffer zone. The preliminary listing is presented on Table 1. The approximate location of the buffer zone is indicated on Figure 3. A wetlands walkover and receptor survey was conducted by ABB-ES personnel on 6 March 1991 to characterize the extent of wetland habitat and types of ecological receptors likely to occur in the vicinity of the site. Plant species were identified during the site visit and signs of wildlife activity noted. A list of the plant species observed is presented in Table 1. Common reed (Phragmites australis) produces an extensive fringing border around Mill Pond in the vicinity of the site. This population is very dense and effectively excludes other plant species, with the exception of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). In the relatively drier areas above the pond, thickets of the dominant staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) are found associated with scattered choke cherry (Prunus virginlana),apple(Pyrus malus),and hawthorn(Crataegus sp.). Weedy species (including various members of the Compositae) and Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) occur in the waste fill areas surrounding the parking lot. Signs of wildlife were evident during the site visit Gulls apparently frequent Mill Pond, and the sumac thickets provide suitable habitat for various songbirds. Several narrow animal trails, burrow holes and signs of frass indicate that rodents occur in the wetland areas. Muskrats, which will feed on reed tubers, may be also be present, although the species prefers cattails and habitat with more stable water levels. Although a benthic macroinvertebrate survey was not conducted, invertebrate fauna in the tidal muds associated with Mill Pond may be numerous enough to support various amphibians and foraging birds. A few minnows and aquatic beetles were observed in Mill Pond. Field Investigation The proposed field investigation will consist of several interrelated components designed to maximize information gathering and data acquisition to meet Phase I objectives. There will be three major components of the investigation: (1) evaluation of groundwater quality; (2) groundwater flow analysis; and (3) evaluation of surface water and sediment quality. To meet these objectives, ABB-ES will advance soil borings and install groundwater monitoring wells, install groundwater piezometers and surface water stakes, and collect surface water and sediment samples from Mill Pond. Refer to Figure 3 for proposed sampling 9 locations. The groundwater quality investigation will involve the advancement of several shallow soil borings, the collection and characterization of soil samples, installation of monitoring wells in the new soil borings, and the collection and laboratory analysis of groundwater samples from the newly installed and pre-existing monitoring wells. Soil borings will be drilled using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig. Borings will be advanced utilizing 4.5-inch-ID, hollow-stem augers. Standard penetration tests yielding split-spoon samples will be conducted continuously from the surface to a depth of approximately 5 feet below the water table. Monitoring wells will be installed in each soil boring such that well screen Intervals are set to intercept the water table. Monitoring wells will be constructed of 2-inch-diameter, flush-threaded, Schedule 40 PVC well screens and riser pipe. The screened section will have 0.010-inch-wide, machine-slotted openings and will be no more than 10 feet in length. The position and length of the screen at each boring location will depend on geology and the depth to groundwater encountered during drilling. Three boring/well installations will be performed within the 100-foot buffer zone. Each of these locations is away from the bank slope adjacent to the pond. The groundwater flow evaluation will involve installation of three piezometer pairs and two surface water stakes and performance of an elevation survey of each of the newly installed depth to groundwater/surface water observation points. Depth to water measurements will be taken at all locations during one measurement round. Subsequent depth to water measurements will be performed at selected locations at several time intervals within one tidal cycle. The surface water stakes and piezometers will be installed in Mill Pond. Surface water stakes will be constructed of hard oak wood, approximately six to eight feet long and approximately 0.5 inches square. Each stake will be driven approximately three feet into the Pond. Piezometers will be constructed of 3/4-inch ID, PVC or steel pipe, with a 6 to 9 inch slotted section at the base. The base will be capped and the slotted interval wrapped with geotechnical filter fabric to prevent infiltration of silt or clay into the piezometers. Piezometers will be steam cleaned prior to installation. Shallow piezometers will be driven to a depth of approximately three feet below the sediment bottom surface. Deep piezometers will be driven approximately six feet below the sediment bottom surface. Surface water samples will be collected at a point two-thirds of the distance above the bottom surface to prevent collection of any waters directly from either the sediment/water interface or the water/air interface. Care will be taken to ensure that upstream disturbances do not cause the collection of unrepresentative samples. The order of sample collection will be from downstream locations toward upstream locations. Sediment samples from below the surface water bodies will be collected with a non-contaminating sediment grab or core sampler. The field investigation will be performed during a time period of approximately two weeks. The drilling and monitoring well installation adjacent to Mill Pond will be performed during the course of one day. The surface water stake and piezometer installation will be performed during the course of one day. Surface water samples and sediment samples will be collected during the course of one day. The results of the proposed Investigation will be submitted to the MADEP to meet the requirements of the Notice of Responsibility and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan for the Phase I investigation. The results should provide an initial understanding of the soil, groundwater, sediment and surface water quality at and adjacent to the Site so that a determination of the potential impact of site and/or surrounding property use to environmental conditions and the need for further investigatory actions can be evaluated. s a n sans I, r H 4�1StJ Ph - �. Ceryb N ° �F nw Asa \ •a�� 1 .{ �y�fi 'Dreenlawn g. � J!� e • . / p LSch- K./� , �xi.;ss h yJ• 7 x/= ` /Ik�emetery / � � �u ! • /^� it L i iL�K¢4�""�� ��'\_ '� �;� ;^.�' i b J•�p° � '�' �a✓ I? 3r C� `,= \° ---- i.c• ^b.a / '/ ss / TICat Pu`r p � _ � :... �G �Ik a Ire9 'I �yl' ,c6emg� Sh rider /"' r 'f- ,� mo h♦ fsGn o �' -;i .✓a/�� e�J/ ,� `' � /� Y;7 v5 �yJ 7, B^t, V� anmCOY Ut\ _ q 5/ gH 1' ti na PG/41 /l f Sh %ti7l��,� _ a"(,r\. / _ Gtawy ' ri ,V 7 O�� Y � 2O�5 • ••O —. 1 ( ! v 7L+y _�. )a- �• ,�" 1 � eF � r ata � /.. _ K, - Q/ • K'e'y Ledg� // �--z - 1 alem, bra �o) SPem al 7 !' Wnar? �ya4.z s �� �i,,,y�IG� T~ � 1 \ C�� � �-�� �T�1��..,i Sta . SCS N��� ' • � t° azl. :,. i y s'ti1 Wnarf ✓scib"\.`\��I-j ,yam/ '�T._ oxrsrt art E rOA Lt$and rl 11 1 vt,, �r akter o' i_ R //r �\ rFr I �o ^11 _ Long Pt .. �Q /... J: I h✓ ,�T Sch t.� .rSv P'aygy>aoC r 4/ ?C� i.. l• \111 ,._ 7 C. ^n / / ll'u�i '1 1� .' bra �C /(/J ` -\ / o -b� t.�etczow� Inc+r -Palmer '4 J SITE iY ,_ 1 lid 1 ��'1 Forest Rim it 11 '1 �'� I 'l� "-!n � g 6 �,.�•�s> „c'. ',° `k� �~ eZ'�--_��"_ pttkering W7,- N a: \�.1U oU Coa((s\\e �r /\a Vcl . a� ` .wi/ifar+tE � , r1 uk i - tl. rptFr s vG_ BOR 4 o v _ w o �• R $CT�� i'> -' '�� ' i'^ � eol / '��C�ar at the�e %7�' F ' .__ r+xP� \<' .\.3FPP '�xti SOURCE:A 1979 TOPOGflAP19C 75 MNUTE SERIES SAtFAL MA 1979 LYNN,MA 4979 QUADRANGLE LOCAMON FIGURE 1' 0 2,000 4,000 - SITE LOCATION HAMBLET AND HAYES FACILITY SCALE FEET - SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I I O N I I 1 i � 1 I I LEGEND: 1 1 Q BUILDING 1 I PROPERTY LINE I 1 1 1 1 RAILROAD TRACK I t 1 J WETLAND Ixylt `N 1 DTfff " ! N. ® POWERLINESAND zj1 rouuR eve 'x SUPPORT MILLPOND `` 'W:a SITE AREA (LOT 117 HAMBLET • 1 I �� AND HAVES CO.; LOT 11%119 THE ImRllef oX, -/' KIRTO CORP.) tmn'wRaTURE ye ele .% a I �£7 fiS i I PoNFA ,i:oY$h� it 1 ! 1 K f l is >.r,•«•• <�,�, .:,_e.,*„as e �ie'.k: , a I t >k �+:k LOT 11 1DTI,j�ie�ee I 1 Y '� 21i Ie O'. 21010 ft t v•• ,• u`LOTIU 1,ye BOAONNMYNE RnaRofo i xb:u X E �r• mwa I lOTftf y�rO�� O /dYC,V ♦rte ___ WTI. wrvl vl k QETER MERNAxfTaxucOxv. .MOWT@IWIS WTI. w1s R WTI R Iu11 \ 6ELTRIC FABBIEM .N,TER®OFAYEB 0 280 /W FIGURE 2 SCALE FEET(APPROX.) PROPERTY OWNERSHIP PLAN NOTES:1)PLAN DERIVED FROM CITY OF SALEM ASSESSORS MAP HAMBLET AND HAYES FACILITY No.24 DATED 1989. 2)ALL LOCATIONSAND DIMENSIONS OF PLAN FEATURES SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS AND PROPERTY ONES ARE APPROMMATE ONLY. ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC 8010-01A 2 X —x FOOT YA ) BUFFER ZONE rnMrm ID CULVERT 10 WUTHPNEX mME�m COXOIIIL 9•' ) LIMITOF a �PAVEMENT % �I MILLPOND r / )A)H1/ B3 BWleoe ABB-6 m -10.7 11 09d SI 9L W.X % _ _ _ _ -10.6- - - esX Bu oLoc.I ABB- ` t ' LIMIT OF I BLBG.J �— PAVEMENT I BLOG.G ABB.R I MUNNU,NUKING iiiiiiiii-liiiii iHiN'I diiiiiiiii I BIM.D HU WELt3 wM1FM091011A HU IN'I I ` 1 DT 6.6 �. BLW.E BLOG.L wHewXib GATE ITE eNISS. 000 wHe O - m 1 +"WEiLI Y x NUWELte `� r WELLS ABB-11 i •. CDNCNETEPAD WATER ABS 11 SUPPLY WELL ' wNsO O 6.6 1 �� BUILD'.M � BLOG.K BLCG.B "%' to 100 FOOT BLDG ABB-7 BUFFER ZONE ID MAW % `WTE % � ��±��e,IMI/SBM `�\.%.�% % LEGEND• 11 TTTT ABB PROPOSED MONITORING WELL / ABB PROPOSED PIEZOMETER LOCATION •• ABB PROPOSED SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE 0 BO 160 SURFACE WATER STAKE HLA MONITORING WELL SCALE FEET FIGURE 3 + � 1)PLAN DERIVED FROM HAMBLET HAVES CO. HLA SOIL BORING "° 3` FIELD INVESTIGATION LOCATION PLAN O EXISTING H&H OBSERVATION WELL HHLAUV9W;ECORDS.SAMPl1NGLOCATIONSAFTER PHASE I LIMITED SITE INVESTIGATION 2)ALL TURESLOCATIONS ANMPLING POINTS AREE HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY —11—APPROXIMATE II FOOT ELEVATION FEATURES AND SAMPLING POINTS ARE CONTOUR APPROXIMATE ONLY. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS --1.3-- APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF BANK ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. TABLE 1 LIST OF PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED DURING SITE VISIT, 6 MARCH 1991 HAMBLET & HAYES FACILITY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Relative Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Achillea millefolium Yarrow Scattered in well-drained areas Asclepias syriaca Common milkweed Scattered in well-drained areas Betula papyrifera White birch Scattered Celastrus scandens Bittersweet Occasional Crataegus sp. Hawthorne Occasional Erigeron canadensis Horseweed Scattered in well-drained areas Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife Common Phragmites australis Common reed Dominant Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Common in well-drained areas Prunus virginiana Choke cherry Occasional Pyrus malus Apple Occasional Quercus alba White oak Occasional Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac Common Rosa sp. Wild rose Common Rubus sp. Bramble Common Solidago sp. Goldenrod Scattered in well-drained areas 2 �OConsff J 'z vie m Commi&im `U Salem. Massachusetts 01970 ASSnCNyy CITY OF SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF APPLICABILITY On Thursday, March 14, 1991 at 7:00 p.m., the Salem Conservation Commission will discuss a Determination of Applicability, of the Wetlands Protection Act, Massachusetts General Law Chapter 131, Section 40. Van Waters and Rogers are requesting the determination for soil and water testing on lots 117, 118 & 119 Colonial Road. The meeting will be held at One Salem Green, Second Floor Conference Room. 310 CMR 10.99 Form 2 DFP Flla No. (ro be o�aea ey DEP) - Commonwealth CiNtTown SQ/fM of Massachusetts ncol,cant van /A15 Dab Peawn Fi1.0 Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 From SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Issuing Authority To Van Waters & Ragers (Name of person making request) (Name of property owner) Aadress""'""'"' Rand Address This determination is issued and delivered as follows: Z by hand delivery to person making request on rdate) by certified mail,return receipt requested on April 2 1991 (date) Pursuant to the authority of G.L.c. 131, §40,the has considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation, and has made the following determination(check whichever is applicable): Location: Street Address Colonial RO Lot Number: 117- 118, 112 1. ^_ The area described below,which includes all/part of the area described in your request, is an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore, any removing,filling,dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent., •'c, : :., 2• = The work described below,which includes alt/part of the work described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act and will remove,fill,dredge or alter that aiea.7hei fore,said work reauires.the filing of a Notice of Intent. Effective 11/10/89 2.1 3. The work described below, which includes atl!part of the work descrfoed to your request. Is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations.and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore. said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. This Determination is negative: 1. ❑ The area described In your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. 2• JZ The work described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.but will not remove, fill, dredge,or alter that area.Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 3. ❑ The work described in your request is within the Buffer Zone.as defined in the regulations. but will not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 4. ❑ The area described in your request is Subject to Protection Under the Act. but since the work described therein meets the requirements for the following exemption.as specified in the Act and the regulations.no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by *v• Sa4dYl Conservation Commission Sigtura{sj r Tl� v V`^' f� . 4 All This Determination must be signed by a majority of the Conservation mission. On this nag day of J 19 1 before me personally appeared XAVII! = , to me known to be the pgrson described in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he!she executed 1 thg.. —aS.his/he tree act and deed. ' t I tary FubMy commistion expires Tiltbp�lertomeuon'0ees not rebeve me sowicant from complying with all other applicable federal.state or local statutes.ordinances. by "or regulations.This DetemiinatiCn snail be valid lar three yews form the date of IssWOce The apokigtmt.the Owner.any person eggneved by this determination.any owMrot land abutting me iano upon wnicn the proposed work s b be bone,or any ten residents of tris city or town in whicrt sucn lend is located.are hereby notified at their rignt to request the department of Environmental Protection to issue a Suawssamg Determination of Applicability,prowamg trio request is mace oy cemfud man or nano delivery to trio Dedanrnent.wnn the fporopnate filing fee and Pee Transmural form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7)within ten days from tlN dots Of Rteanoe of this Determination.A copy at the request shelf alma fame time do sent by cemtie0 mail or hand owivery to me Cons intmon Commission and IMS applicant. 2.2A 310 CMR 10.99 Form 2 DEP Fk No. M (To W orov�eo by DEP) 6 Commonwealth Gityjown �M of Massachusetts Antra cant van r!ClZkJS 9 Roc�/S y DAN PsouM FNa LIQ '7, /91 rw Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 From SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION Issuing Authority To Van Wat r� a 4 Rngprg (Name of person making request) (Name of property owner I Andress ^'^^' ' u^ Address This determination is issued and delivered as follows: .1 by hand delivery to person making request on (date) by certified mail,return receipt requested on April 2 1991 (date) Pursuant to the authority of G.L.c. 131, §40,the has considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation,and has made the following determination(check whichever is applicable): Location: Street Address Lot Number: 117, 118 119 w 1. ^_ The area described below,which includes allipart of the area described in your request, is an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore,any removing,filling,dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent.. 2. = The work described below,which includes all/part of the work described in your request is w�tlt�n` an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act and will remove,fill,dredge or alter that area,There- -•�J,; ..1,11,_, •� fore.said work reduires.the filing of a Notice of Intent. Effective 11/10189 2.1 3. The work described below, which Includes all/par of the work descnoed in vour request. is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations, and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. This Determination is negative: 1. ❑ The area described in your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. 2. JZ The work described In your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act, but will not remove,fill,dredge,or alter that area. Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 3. ❑ The work described in your request is within the Buffer Zone.as defined to the regulations, but will not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore, said worK does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 4 ❑ The area described to your request is Subject to Protection Under the Act, but since the work descnoed therein meets the requirements for the following exemptton.as specified in the Act and the regulations.no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by *yti Smern Conservation Commission Sig ture(s) r 10, /i This Determination must be signed by a majority of the Conservation mission. On this ata day of 199,before me personally appeared e, � o2g2'�pile to me known to be the pCrspndeicribed in.and who executed,the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he!she executed �;thd,same as.hiskier free act and deed. n t s? to Pub My commiskon expires TfI1Lpel2Rnination'does not relieve me applicant tram eomptying with au other applicable federal.state or total statutes.ordinances. Op "or reguiauons.This Determination suit be Veld for three years tom the dale at issuance The apolicant.the owner.any person aggrieved by this Determination.any owner of land mounting ins tend upon wnien the proposed work al as be porta.or any len residents at ire any or town in which such tend IS located,are hersay notified of their right to request ins Department of Environmental Protection to issue a Superseding Determination of Applicability,providing Ins request is mace by candroo man or nano delivery to the Department.with Ire apor0pnate tiling tee and Fee Transmural Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03f71 within ten days from OW pate Of eWiance of IM Determination.A copy of the request snali at the fame time be sent by an tiea man or nano aeiwery to me Conservation Commission and ins applicant. 2.2A M CD OD p'ODOD ASEA BROWN BOVERI PN:6440-00 March 7, 1991 Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 SUBJECT: Reauest for Determination of Applicability for Phase I Field Investigation Hamblet & Haves Facility, Salem MA Dear Members; As you are aware, ABB Environmental Services Inc. (ABB-ES) will be conducting the Phase I - Limited Site Investigation required by the MADEP at the subject Site. As you requested during the February 28, 1991 regular meeting of the Commission, ABB-ES has prepared the following Request for Determination of Applicability on behalf of Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. for your review. We look forward to the opportunity of discussing the project with you at the earliest possible convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ABB ENV,jRON1NTAL SERVICES, INC. R. Duff Collins Paul J. ner, P. . Field Operations Leader Senior roject Manager Enclosure cc: Don Black, Van Waters & Rogers ABB Environmental Services Inc. Southern New England Division Corporate Place 128 Telephone(617)245-6606 107 Audubon Road Fax(617)246-5060 Wakefield, Massachusetts 01880 s-