The URL can be used to link to this page

64-607 - CLARK AVENUE - CONSERVATION COMMISSION �°kry - - __._. _ - --- -- _ _ - --._ _ _ -- - ;: k ;� NOI Status Sheet Address: C lir �` `� DEP #: - Application Type: /vb� Date Submitted: l� Contact Name: n - R GL\ �i�(�'�s Phone: '��l f�� r� Proposed activity: A---CI JL� r- .- c < -t 4�( ✓A,pplication Complete orrect Fee Received .Abutters List Requested -Received V 1 V(lt- .-.Legal Ad Sent ,Legal Ad Confirmed 0 line ✓Added to Agenda Agenda to Applicant 2Lgent Comments to Commission DEP Comments Hearing Opened: rContinued:�ly/�6Site Visit: 'Abutters Notice Confirmed Permit Sent to Applicant and DEP r `-Confirmation of Delivery Expiration date added to calendar /Added to database Applicant Recorded OoC with Registry Preconstruction Meeting: Certificate of Compliance Sent to Applicant and DEP Confirmation of Delivery Applicant Recorded CoC with Registry Notes: �� CJ . IUbT S••r r✓� �-e,.A—s� ` ,, --�� t. �✓. 6 ^t C l'rO I `-"\ * �I:\C,ON CMUldmi Rive\project stat sheet\NOI statues sheet 2 1 2Zdoc 's 55eei 1j xk.. 1 I j\ Ti . — a ,,The Woodlands' Clark Avenue •,Fti. 683354 Essex D) Btchtrice 80690 Regis Southern Essex District Registry 6/14/2017 03:34 PR CONDN Pg: 1118 AFI k Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by ManDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands 64-607 MaseDEP File# WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown A. General Information Please note: Salem omm mbee� t.From: Conservation Cission with adoed 2.This issuance is for a.®Order of Conditions b.E]Amended Order of Conditions space toaoo=nn (check one): vie Regotry a(oeeds 3.To: Applicant: Requiremem4 a.First Name b.Last Name important: NSD Realty Trust When filling out forms on c organization the 76 Oakville St computer, d.Meabrg ss Addre use only the MA 01905 Lynn _ tab key to nn Zip code move your e.Ctlyrrown f State g• P cursor-do not use me a.Property Owner(if different from applicant): return key. �—'� Barbara Driscoll .Alm I i a.Fast Name b.Last Name . Organization as 18 Wallace Road d.Mailing Address Lynn MA 01901 e.6ity/rown r.slate 9•ZIP Code 5. Project Location: Clark Ave. Salem a.Street Address b.Cay/Town 6 7 8&9 c.Assessors Map/Plat Number d.P8, vLot Number d m d m s_ Latitude and Longitude, if known: s d.Latitude e.Longdude Page 1 of 12 vpdam5.doc•rer.6118=5 Vassachusetts,lDepartment of Environmental Protection Provided by hilassDER Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 6-1-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File a MaissaphusOttsVetlancls Protection Act KGI. c; 131, §+q T690-f ir Salern r_0 City/Town A. Ge"ekal 16formation (cont) 6 Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for(attach additional information if more than one parcel); South,Essex ___.. 36055,-_36056,. 36057 a.Count b.Cedilficate Number(iffegistered lana) c.BDok clPage 7. Dallas, 2/1112016 2/12=16 o Date Nows of IN C_Date of tssusnee . ent FAid D.Daie-PG_he kierioil; _Ic�jd_ B. Final Approved Plans,ad d.Other Documents(attach additional plan or document references as needed): Seeattaiched, a.Plan Tille 96_.Ptl and Stamped b d Final Revision Date e.scale Land Court Plan No. L�5,9-_? (Lots 4.03 and 404) f.Adftbnal Plan orDbournent Title- g�Date 8Findings i. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Following the,review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and vctied on the information provided in tft.apofloationand presentedift the.pubtic-hearing;this 7Commi"idft finds that ex the areas in which woM-isphJ'pos4d is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act(the Act). Check all Mat apply: o a. 0 Public Water Supply 6. [3 Land Containing Shellfish C4 Poll0 Prevention of ution 0. 0 Private,Water Supply e. [I Fisheries t. 0 Potecbon 61 Wildlife. Habitat Groundwater Supply h: ® -Storm Damage Prevention i. 0 Flood Control 2. This Cornmission hereby finds the proilect,as.proposed..is:(check one of the followinill'boxes) Approved subiject to: a! 0 the following conditions'WhiCh are.necessary in.accordance',with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations.This Commission orders that.all wodcshall be performed in accordance,with the Notice of Intent referenced above,the following General Conditions,and any other special conditions attached 1q,this-Order.To the extent that the;fiollowIng conditions modify.or4differ from the,plans, specifications,orother' proposals submitted with,the Notice of intent, these conditions shallcontrol LAND COURT 7 herein vii " our appro 1. all 'w&� .w&-.edafs P p0iie zo 12 MAY 10 2017 -r4oaCHIEF SVWEYOR Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEPTransaction# Salem City/Town B. Findings (cont.) Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect the interests of the Act, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). 3. ❑ Buffer Zone Impacts: Shortest distance between limit of project 25+/- disturbance and the wetland resource area specified in 310 CMR 10.02(1)(a) a.linear feet Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement I 4. ❑ Bank a.linear feet b.linear feet c.linear feet d.linear feet 5. ❑ Bordering Vegetated Wetland a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 8. ❑ Land Under -- T-sq Waterbodies and asq . uare feel b.square feetuare feet d.square feet Waterways e.cly dredged f.c4 dredged 7. ❑ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage e.cubic feet f.wbic feet g.cubic feet h.cubic feet 8. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c.cubic feet d.cubic feet e.cubic feet t.cubic feet 9. ❑ Riverfront Area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq It within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet Sq ft between 100- 200 It g.square feet h.square feet i.square feet j.square feet wpawms.0 c• m,w6wi s Page 3 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEPFile# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem cityrrown B. Findings (cont.) Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 1o. ❑ Designated Port Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below Areas it. ❑ Land Under the Ocean a.square feet b.square feet c.dy dredged d.cfy dredged 12. ❑ Barrier Beaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below 13. El Coastal Beaches cucu yd a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment yd 14. L] Coastal Dunes cu yd cu a.square feet b.square feet c.nourishment d.nourishment 15. ❑ Coastal Banks a.linearfeet b.linear feet 15. ❑ Rocky Intertidal _ Shores a.square feet b.square feet 17. ❑ Salt Marshes a.squarefeet b.squarefeet c.square feet d.square feet 1e. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds a.square feet b.square feet c.My dredged d.dy dredged 19. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish a.square feel b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet 20. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, Inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways,above TW-dredged b.;iy dredged 21. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm a.square feet b.square feet Flowage 22. ❑ Riverfront Area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq It within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet Sq ft between 100- aqua feet g. 200 ft square feet h.square feet i.square feet j.sq wpatorm5.Eoc• rov.en62015 Page 4012 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# 1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown B. Findings (cont.) project is for 23. F1Restoration/Enhancement the purpose of o enhancinga a.square feet of BVW b.square feet of salt marsh wetland 24. ❑ Stream Crossing(s): s resource area 9( ) in addition to the square footage that a.number of new stream crossings b.number of replacement stream crossings has been C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act entered in Section B.5.c (BVW)or The following conditions are only applicable to Approved projects. BA To(Salt Marsh)above, 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other please enter regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. the additional 9 ry ty amount here. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. The work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. The time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. c. If the work is for a Test Project, this Order of Conditions shall be valid for no more than one year. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. An Order of Conditions for a Test Project may be extended for one additional year only upon written application by the applicant, subject to the provisions of 310 CMR 10.05(11)(f). 6. If this Order constitutes an Amended Order of Conditions, this Amended Order of Conditions does not extend the issuance date of the original Final Order of Conditions and the Order will expire on 2/12/2019 unless extended in writing by the Department. 7. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill.Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. wyafonn5.tl - rev.61162015 Page 5 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# 1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 8. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 9. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. The recording information shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 10. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or, "MassDEP"] "File Number 64-607 11. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before MassDEP. 12. Upon completion of the work described herein,the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A)to the Conservation Commission. 13. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 14. Any change to the plans identified in Condition#13 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 15. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 16. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. wPaforms.dac• re..6116ao1s Page 6 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem city/rom C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(cont.) 17. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland,the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. 19. The work associated with this Order(the"Project") (1) ® is subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards (2) ❑ is NOT subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards If the work is subject to the Stormwater Standards,then the project Is subject to the following conditions: a) All work, including site preparation, land disturbance, construction and redevelopment, shall be implemented in accordance with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and, if applicable,the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit as required by Stormwater Condition 8. Construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices (BMPs) shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. b) No stormwater runoff may be discharged to the post-construction stormwater BMPs unless and until a Registered Professional Engineer provides a Certification that: i. all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification. For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation, recharge, and/or treatment, the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures; ii. as-built final construction BMP plans are included, signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, certifying the site is fully stabilized, iii. any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed, as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10, "afonn5.d=• m.6/162015 Page 7 of 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 _ WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) iv. all post-construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans (including all planting plans)approved by the issuing authority, and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition; v. any vegetation associated with post-construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. c) The landowner is responsible for BMP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another party has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance. Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance, or Partial Certificate of Compliance, the responsible party(defined in General Condition 18(e))shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement("O&M Statement)for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ("O&M Plan")and certifying the following: i.)the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance, and ii.)the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post-construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and, if applicable,the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility, the landowner, or owner of any drainage easement, assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP. To overcome this presumption,the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record, acceptable to the issuing authority, evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP, and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 18(f)through 18(k)with respect to that BMP. Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 18(f)through 18(k)with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance. In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot,the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs. A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement. f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance with the design plans,the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. xgeformS.Coc• rev.6116/2015 Pape 8 or 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem cityrrom C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(cont.) g) The responsible party shall: 1. Maintain an operation and maintenance log for the last three(3)consecutive calendar years of inspections, repairs, maintenance and/or replacement of the stormwater management system or any part thereof, and disposal(for disposal the log shall indicate the type of material and the disposal location); 2. Make the maintenance log available to MassDEP and the Conservation Commission('Commission") upon request; and 3. Allow members and agents of the MassDEP and the Commission to enter and inspect the site to evaluate and ensure that the responsible party is in compliance with the requirements for each BMP established in the O&M Plan approved by the issuing authority. h) All sediment or other contaminants removed from stormwater BMPs shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. i) Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system as defined in 310 CMR 10.04 are prohibited. j) The stormwater management system approved in the Order of Conditions shall not be changed without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. k) Areas designated as qualifying pervious areas for the purpose of the Low Impact Site Design Credit(as defined in the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook,Volume 3, Chapter 1, Low Impact Development Site Design Credits)shall not be altered without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. I) Access for maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of BMPs shall not be withheld. Any fencing constructed around stormwater BMPs shall include access gates and shall be at least six inches above grade to allow for wildlife passage. Special Conditions(if you need more space for additional conditions, please attach a text document): See attached 20. For Test Projects subject to 310 CMR 10.05(l 1), the applicant shall also implement the monitoring plan and the restoration plan submitted with the Notice of Intent. If the conservation commission or Department determines that the Test Project threatens the public health, safety or the environment, the applicant shall implement the removal plan submitted with the Notice of Intent or modify the project as directed by the conservation commission or the Department. xpNamS.Eoc• rev.6/162015 Page 9 M 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# 1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance 1. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2. The Salem hereby finds(check one that applies): Conservation Commission a. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: 1.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. b. ®that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: Wetlands Protection&Conservation Ordinance c. 50 1.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation 3. The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows(if you need more space for additional conditions,attach a text document): Attached special conditions are issued under the Wetlands Protection Act and are sufficient for compliance with the local ordinance wPereeas.e«•.eV.snsrzots Pave io m 12 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands (�k—G-67 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDDEEEP/Trraan�saction# City/r�otwn ` E. Signatures Important:When This Order is valid for three years,unless otherwise specified as a special a l 6 filling out forms condition pursuant to General Conditions#4,from the date of issuance. t.D e of l suance on the computer, use only the tab Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form. key to move your This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. 2.Number of Signers cursor-do not use the return The Order must be mailed by certified mail(return receipt equ st or nd delivered to key the applicant.A copy must be mailed, hand delivered or tied troni ly at a same time VQwith the appro nate MassDEP Regional Office. VQ 11 Signature _ ❑ by hand delivery on by certified mail,return receipt requested V'.\*(6 Date Da F. Appeals The applicant,the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions.The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department,with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order.A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order,or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M.G.L.c. 131, §40), and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations(310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw,and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations,the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. 1 wpa5sys.tloc• rev.0=5WIO Papej�afi� Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands 64-607 WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Salem Cityrrown G. Recording Information Prior to commencement of work,this Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land,the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions. The recording information on this page shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. To: Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: Project Location MassDEP File NumberI', Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: County Book Page for Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Document Number Signature of Applicant wperonn5.dac• rev.6/16=15 Page 12 or 12 Attachment to Order of Conditions# 64-607 Page 1 of 5 SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION ATTACHMENT TO ORDER OF CONDITIONS DEP FILE#64-607 Clark Avenue Subdivision City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife and Certified Vernal Pools Map(12/3/2015,online)from Natural Heritage &Endangered Species Program(NHESP)of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, it has been determined that this project does not occur near any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor contain any vernal pools. This Order permits a residential subdivision and associated improvements per 11/24/2015 Notice of Intent, approved plans,and the following conditions. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety(including all 5 pages of Special Conditions) at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance. A copy of the recording information must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission before any work approved in this Order commences. 2. Approval of this application does not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Section 40,Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wetlands Protection Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 50. 3. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plan(s). No alteration of wetland resource areas or associated buffer zones,other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. 4. Prior to any work commencing on site,a DEP Sign showing DEP File#64-607 must be installed at the entrance to the site and seen from the public way,but not placed on a living tree. 5. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeal period has lapsed from the date of the issuance of this Order. 6. With respect to this Order,the Commission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers to act on its behalf in administering and enforcing this Order. 7. The Commission or its Agent,officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at any time for compliance with the conditions of this Order,the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40,the Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00,and shall have the right to require any data or documentation that it deems necessary for that evaluation. 8. The term"Applicant"as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner,any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of intent,supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all Attachment to Order of Conditions#64-607 I Page 2 of 5 sl transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local permits and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: (1) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(P.L.92-500,86 stat. 816),U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. (2) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains under the State Building Code(780 CMR 744.). 10. If there are conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s)shall rule. 11. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 12. The Commission or its Agent shall have the discretion to modify the erosion/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose additional conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or potential impacts resulting from the work herein permitted. 14. The work shall conform to the following attached plans and special conditions: Final Approved Plans "THE WOODLANDS' SUBDIVISION, SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS (sheets I — 11) (Tule) 1/29/2016 (Dated) Peter M. Blaisdell,Jr. (Signed and Stamped by) City of Salem Conservation Commission (On file with) I Final Approved Plans Mitigative Drainage Analysis, Proposed Cluster Subdivision,"The Woodlands" (Tule) 1/29/2016 (Dated) Peter M. Blaisdell,Jr. (Signed and Stamped by) City of Salem Conservation Commission (On file with) ., Attachment to Order of Conditions # 64607 'ta Page 3 of 5 15. Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s)or any deviation in construction from the approved plan(s)shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Project Change with the Commission. The Notice shall be accompanied by a written inquiry prior to their implementation in the field,as to whether the change(s)is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Intent or a request to correct or amend this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. 16. In conjunction with the sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued,the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the buyer that he/she is aware of an outstanding Girder of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. 17. [Reserved]. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 18. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site other than activities listed above,there must be a Pre-Construction Meeting on site between the project supervisor,the contractor responsible for the work,and the Conservation Agent and/or a member of the Conservation Commission to ensure that the requirements of the Order of Conditions are understood. The staked erosion control line shall be adjusted, if necessary,during the pre-construction meeting. Please contact the Conservation Agent at (978)619-5685 at least forty-eight(48)hours prior to construction to arrange for the Pre- Construction Meeting. 19. Prior to the pre-construction meeting and commencement of any activity on this site,sedimentation and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commission and/or its Agent shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 20. No clearing of vegetation,including trees,or disturbance of soil shall occur prior to the pre-construction meeting. Minimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be allowed prior to the pre- construction meeting if absolutely necessary in order to place erosion control stakes where required. 21. There shall be adequate additional erosion and sediment controls stored onsite for emergency purposes. EROSION CONTROL 22. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in any wetland resource area and/or buffer zones. The erosion control measures shown on the approval plan(s)and provisions in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project;the Commission or its Agent may require additional measures. 23. All debris,fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource areas. 24. Erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. 25. The area of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construction day. p^'""" % Attachment to Order of Conditions #64-607 Page 4 of 5 M 26. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wetland resource areas. All discharge from de-watering activities shall be filtered through straw bale sediment traps,silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 27. Within thirty(30)days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project,all disturbed areas in the completed portion of the site shall be permanently stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover,using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. 28. If soils are to be disturbed for longer than two(2)months,a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth,exposed surface shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures,firmly anchored,to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 29. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s)approved in this Order shall be available on site at all times when work is in progress. 30. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond the limit of work as defined by the siltation barriers shown on the approved plan(s). 31. All waste products,grubbed stumps,slash;construction materials,etc.shall be deposited at least 100 feet from wetland resource areas and 200 feet from river. 32. Cement trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area,nor into any drainage system. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wetland resource area shall be immediately removed. 33. All exposed sub-soils skull be covered by a minimum of three(3)inches of quality screened loam topsoil prior to seeding and food stabilization. 34. Immediately following drainage structure installation all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,strawbale barriers and/or silt bags to filter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system. 35. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource areas. 36. All equipment shall be inspected regularly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines,cylinders or any other components shall be fixed immediately. 37. During construction,all drainage structures shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 38. The applicant is herby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement actions by the Conservation Commission including,but not limited to,civil administrative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21 A,section 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 39. Upon completion of construction and final soil stabilization,the applicant shall submit the following to the Conservation Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance(COC): (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form(WPA Form 8A or other form if required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). . 1 Attachment to Order of Conditions# 64-607 ?A $ Page 5 of 5 (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions. (3) An"As-Built"plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor showing post-construction conditions within all areas under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. This plan shall include at a minimum: (a) All wetland resource area boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback areas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Conditions; (b) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,structures and best management designs,including foundation drains,constructed under this Order within any wetland resource area or buffer zone; (c) Distances from any structures constructed under this Order to wetland resource areas- "structures"include,but are not limited to,all buildings,septic system components,wells, utility lines,fences,retaining walls,and roads/driveways; (d) A line delineating the limit of work-"work"includes any filling,excavating and/or disturbance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; 40. When issued,the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the recording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. 41. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions,the report must specify how the work differs;at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission,may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 42. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning until all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Agent has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 43. Open space markers shall be installed at rear of residential lots that are adjacent to the subdivision's open space.Number,location,and design of markers shall require review and approval by the Conservation Agent. 44. Prior to construction of drainage basins,notice shall be provided to the City so that City staff have the opportunity to witness seasonal groundwater elevation. I I :, Dacurenc. 533354 1 ESSEX SOUTHERN DI TRICT REGISTRY OF DEEDS yt RECEIVED FOR REGISTRATION On` 5/14/2017 03:34 PH cjote,9 .en Cert: 90521 COOY.: 539 i i i r . Mr.Tom Devine,Conservation Agent City Hall Annex Salem,MA 01970 Re: Conservation Commission Peer Review The Woodlands,Clark Avenue December 20,2015 Tom, Below is a summary of my initial review comments on The Woodlands Definitive Subdivision Plans and accompanying the Notice of Intent application and stormwater package: Plan Set 1. Vertical Datum to be confirmed. Benchmarks to be set prior to construction to an established datum. 2. Sheet 1, note 10-There are several drain lines set at less than 0.5%.Suggest note revision or OCS configuration revision. 3. Clarify use of Lot 27. 4. Access to open space appears limited. No direct access appears provided to lots 12-18&23-25.Suggest access along lots 06-17&06-19 and street access via South Ridge Circle. 5. Is full cul-de-sac circle included on site,with additional land added to street layout?Confirm City property has minimum frontage for access? 6. Due to the substantial amount of grading required for this project(+20 foot cuts and+2-foot fills) construction period erosion controls,stockpiles,and storm water management should be provided to confirm appropriate care is undertaken during construction to prevent sediment migration. 7. Grading of woodlands road to be provided with additional detail from 10+50 to end as contours appear orphaned with grading required off-site. Existing profiles grades also are not depicted. 8. Additional spot shots to be provided at Lot 12 to detail overflow from Pond 1. 9. 18" HDPE from STA 1+74 to pond follows property line and may be subject to damage from road monument installation and possible fence line installation.Suggest RCP or relocation off-center. 10. Drainage easements to provide 30 foot minimum width. 11. Outlet control structure orifice sizing to be 4-inch minimum.(pond 2 specifically) 12. Detail flow path of outfall from Pond 2 off-site as it does not appear to be directed toward the northern wetlands but rather across the buffer zone toward Lot 07-0008. 13. Double catchbasin at the end of Woodlands Road would appear to be aligned with a driveway access to City land. Drainage inlets should be avoided at driveway openings/curbcuts. 14. Culvert Outlet from Pond 2 disagrees with HydroCAD.Revise. 15. Pond 3 forebay connection to infiltration pond 3 appears somewhat irregular.Please clarify. 16. Label wetland flags at pocket wetlands'B'and'C'. Provide total SF/volume or areas. 17. All reference to'Hay'to be replaced with'Straw'. 18. Provide a construction entrance detail,and typical trench detail. 19. Each row of the infiltration system to be provided with an inspection port at each end. 20. Maximum slopes to be 3:1 unless otherwise addition stabilization provided above and beyond typical loam&seed practices.Riprap detail to specify crushed stones size. 21. Open Space markers should be incorporated into the design at the rear property lines.Lot corner s of open space lots should also be monumented. 22. Trail detail at 3-inch minus appears heavy. Request similar cross section to other City projects underway. 23. Outlet control structures should be relocated to ponds for readily available visual inspection of any clogs, trash,or other debris.Culvert routing to OCS structure appear unwarranted as they are not utilized for attenuation. Application and Stormwater package 24. Provide HydroCAD nodes and design points on watershed plans. 25. Minimum Tc=6 minutes 26. Does the current ORAD remain valid or is it expired? 27. Clarify why Category 38,3C,Category 6 do not apply on the transmittal form? 28. CPPP inspection form duplicates'forebay'column. 29. If isolated pocket wetlands'B'and'C'are to be used to hold stormwater,drainage easement should be provided as necessary. Note,discharge is proposed to increase to these on-site resources. 30. Wetlands B&C(nodes 130L&141L)should be modeled as ponds to determine if they surcharge to the southern property design point. 31. All closed drainage system components should at a minimum be designed to the 25-year storm event; specifically surcharging components.(Majority of analysis appears to use 100-year storm in calculations) 32. Pond 2 summary sheet to review culvert size for consistency with plans and calculations. 33. Southern flow to the southern property line should be broken out. [Ex-3 to be compared to proposed pond 3,Ex3r,and any overflow from modeled wetlands'B'and 'C'j. Provide summary table of pre-post conditions. 34. If the Cultec system will be designed to surcharge to the street,the street closed drainage system should be modeled in the subdivision.The Clark Avenue closed system should also be checked for capacity. 35. Provide hydrographs for all stormwater ponds. 36. System to be modeled through 64-hours based on draw down times for full volumes. 37. Oscillations should be managed with finer routing(smaller dt) 38. If OCS structures are not located at ponds,Ponds should be routed through inlet culverts to OCS structure to determine if there is a hydraulic restriction on the up-gradient side,in addition to that modeled on the down-gradient side.. 39. As the Cultec System is modeled to surcharge without another overflow,the drawdown time should include contributory pipe volume. 40. Grate analysis depicts a 4"pond at the South Ridge Circle culdesac.This area should be modeled to insure that driveways do not take on water. 41. Riprap to be size based on velocities. 42. Pipe network/HY-8 model not provided for review. 43. Un-witnessed soil tests to be witnessed prior to construction to confirm ESHW Several test would appear to have the potential for an ESHW closer to 7.5 feet as opposed to 10 feet.The term"Dominant Redox" should be clarified as ESHW delineation should includes reductions aslo. 44. Provide responsible party information on stormwater management system and components,(i.e. Home Owner's Association) 45. Construction period sediment deposits at erosion control devices to be removed at 1/3 height or 6 inches. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. Regards, le,44 Gregory M.St. Louis, PE-Chairman Salem Conservation Commission I 7 WILLIAMS SPARAGES Project file: SALE-0026 ENG,NEEM , a NNENf , SURMfl T January 14, 2016 S Mr. Tom Devine, Senior Planner City of Salem Department of Planning&Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: "The Woodlands" subdivision(Clark Avenue), Salem,MA DEP File No: 064-0607 Responses to Conservation Commission Comments Dear Mr. Devine, The purpose of this letter is to respond to the Conservation Commission's project review comments regarding "The Woodlands" subdivision project located off of Clark Avenue. The commission's comments are shown below and our responses are in italic text that follows. Plan Set 1. Vertical Datum to be confirmed. Benchmarks to be set prior to construction to an established datum. Agreed. Benchmarks will be set as part of the construction layout. 2. Sheet 1,note 10 -There are several drain lines set at less than 0.5%.Suggest note revision or OCS configuration revision. The note will be revised accordingly. 3. Clarify use of Lot 27. Lot 27 has no proposed use at this time and it is not residentially zoned.Any further work on this property will require applicable permits to be filed. 4. Access to open space appears limited. No direct access appears provided to lots 12-18&23-25. Suggest access along lots 06-17&06-19 and street access via South Ridge Circle. Access is proposed directly from the project sidewalks. There has been an additional access/path added to the Open Space 2 parcel. It is preferred not to build paths that lead to the private homeowners'yards. 189 North Main Street, Suite 101 9 Middleton, MA 01949 • Tel: (978) 539-8088 • www.wsengineers.com 5. Is full cul-de-sac circle included on site,with additional land added to street layout? Confirm City property has minimum frontage for access? Full cul-de-sac is provided on site. All building lots are provided with minimum frontage. Other lots have sufficient frontage for proposed uses. 6. Due to the substantial amount of grading required for this project(+20 foot cuts and+2-foot fills)construction period erosion controls,stockpiles,and storm water management should be provided to confirm appropriate care is undertaken during construction to prevent sediment migration. The Project documents include a construction period prevention plan and contain provisions for erosion controls.A NPDES Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is required and will have provisions for implementation and regular monitoring of construction controls. 7. Grading of woodlands road to be provided with additional detail from 10+50 to end as contours appear orphaned with grading required off-site. Existing profiles grades also are not depicted. The roadway at 10+50 matches the contour at the abutting property. The existing grades are not shown but can be added to the plan if deemed necessary. The existing centerline and sideline grade lines are shown to scale on the profile and the contours are shown on the plan. We find that numerically showing the proposed grades alongside the existing can lead to unnecessary confusion. 8. Additional spot shots to be provided at Lot 12 to detail overflow from Pond 1. We will add additional spot elevations to the plans. 9. 18" HDPE from STA 1+74 to pond follows property line and may be subject to damage from road monument installation and possible fence line installation. Suggest RCP or relocation off-center. We will relocate the pipe slightly to the northeast in order to avoid conflicts with the street monumentation. We don't expect fencing to be an issue given the depth of the pipe. 10. Drainage easements to provide 30 foot minimum width. The easements have been provided in accordance with the provisions of the subdivision regulations Which require a minimum width of 20 feet. 11. Outlet control structure orifice sizing to be 4-inch minimum. (pond 2 specifically) The outlet control size is based on the required size to mitigate the peak flozo rate in that direction. The 100 year storm flow rate Q=5.47 efs. If the concern is clogging, we will specify a perforated PVC tee to ensure that the orifice operates as intended. J 12. Detail flow path of outfall from Pond 2 off-site as it does not appear to be directed toward the northern wetlands but rather across the buffer zone toward Lot 07-0008. The runoff does discharge to the wetland but, like the runoff in the existing condition, discharges over upland areas first. If desired, the flow could be further spread. 13. Double catchbasin at the end of Woodlands Road would appear to be aligned with a driveway access to City land. Drainage inlets should be avoided at driveway openings/curbcuts. No curbcut is proposed at that location. There is not a need to create one at that point and no traffic, other than foot traffic is proposed. 14. Culvert Outlet from Pond 2 disagrees with HydroCAD. Revise. We are not certain what is not in agreement. The plans call for a 12"culvert with an inlet invert at 127.5 and an outlet end at 127.0 which matches the HydroCAD information. 15. Pond 3 forebay connection to infiltration pond 3 appears somewhat irregular. Please clarify. The outlet from the forebay allows the design to better accommodate the existing grades and areas of available soil depth. We feel it allows for reduced site disturbance within the buffer zone. 16. Label wetland flags at pocket wetlands 'B' and'C'. Provide total SF/volume or areas. The flag designations at isolated wetland areas "b"and "c"will be added to the plan and the storage volume ofeach will also be added. The areas are approximately one half the requirement to be qualified as jurisdictional. 17. All reference to 'Hay' to be replaced with 'Straw'. The plans will be amended as requested. 18. Provide a construction entrance detail, and typical trench detail. The construction entrance detail will be added to the plans. There is a utility trench detail on sheet 9. 19. Each row of the infiltration system to be provided with an inspection port at each end. The inspection reports will be added as requested. 20. Maximum slopes to be 3:1 unless otherwise addition stabilization provided above and beyond typical loam&seed practices. Riprap detail to specify crushed stones size. We agree. The rip-rap detail will be amended to include the size of the crushed stone (3/4"- 1 'h"). 21. Open Space markers should be incorporated into the design at the rear property lines. Lot corner s of open space lots should also be monumented. We are willing to have that discussion,however it should be noted that the rear property lines are outside the 100'buffer zone. 22. Trail detail at 3-inch minus appears heavy. Request similar cross section to other City projects underway. Per discussions with the planning board, the path will be less intrusive and will simply be cleared and the wood chips from the clearing operation will be used to surface the path. 23. Outlet control structures should be relocated to ponds for readily available visual inspection of any clogs,trash,or other debris. Culvert routing to OCS structure appear unwarranted as they are not utilized for attenuation. The outlet control structures are accessible for inspection. They are on the berms so are accessible during pond flooding and are provided with manhole covers for access. It has been our experience that routing to the OCS structure makes for a more accurate model. We feel the method should remain Application and Stormwater package 24. Provide HydroCAD nodes and design points on watershed plans. We will update the watershed Maps to reflect the HydroCAD nodes and design points. 25. Minimum Tc =6 minutes The original study provided a Minimum Tc =5 minutes which we have no reason to believe should be amended. HOwever we had have rerun the model with a Minimum Tc= 6 minutes. The result is negligible and continues to show mitigation of the project effects. The revised summary table is attached. 26. Does the current ORAD remain valid or is it expired? There is not a current ORAD. The wetlands were reflagged for this application. 27. Clarify why Category 3B,3C,Category 6 do not apply on the transmittal form? Category 3B is for buildings within the Buffer Zone and there are none on this project Category 3C is for roadway within the Buffer Zone and there is none on this project. Category 6 is for a project where the only item in the application is wetland delineation. It is DEP's policy that a notice of intent for work is being filed, the fee is only for the activity applied for. 28. CPPP inspection form duplicates Torebay' column. The form will be revised accordingly. 29. If isolated pocket wetlands 'B' and 'C' are to be used to hold stormwater, drainage easement should be provided as necessary. Note, discharge is proposed to increase to these on-site resources. Those areas are not proposed to hold stormwater any differently than they currently do. No construction is proposed on lot 27. We may anticipate easements if there were future development on this lot. 30. Wetlands B&C (nodes 130L& 141L) should be modeled as ponds to determine if they surcharge to the southern property design point. We will revise the model to include these ponds but don't expect that the change will make an appreciable difference. 31. All closed drainage system components should at a minimum be designed to the 25-year storm event;specifically surcharging components. (Majority of analysis appears to use 100- year storm in calculations) We are not sure of the meaning of this comment. However, we believe that our design provides protection to the project lots and abutting properties in the 100 year storm, which is our intention. 32. Pond 2 summary sheet to review culvert size for consistency with plans and calculations. We did not find any discrepancies with the culvert sizing, however, we will correct the typo calling for the bottom of the bene to be 128.5, and, in place thereof, specifij the bottom of berm at elevation 128.0 33. Southern flow to the southern property line should be broken out. [Ex-3 to be compared to proposed pond 3, Ex3r,and any overflow from modeled wetlands 'B' and'C']. Provide summary table of pre-post conditions. We will compare the nodes as requested in a revised summary table. See previous comment regarding isolated wetlands. 34. If the Cultec system will be designed to surcharge to the street,the street closed drainage system should be modeled in the subdivision.The Clark Avenue closed system should also be checked for capacity. As can be seen on the summanj tables, the project will actually reduce the amount of flow to the existing drainage system in Clark Avenue and zvas done intentionally so that we would not have to model the performance of the existing system. It is our position that since we are reducing the peak floev rates to Clark Avenue, we are reducing the impact on the system, and therefore,a capacity analysis is not warranted. 35. Provide hydrographs for all stormwater ponds. Stormwater Pond hydrographs will be provided as requested. e 36. System to be modeled through 64-hours based on draw down times for full volumes. We disagree with this comment as a typical practice for the time span is that it should be long enough to cover all of the flow of interest. The design storm is based on 24 hours, increasing the model to cover 64 hours will not increase accuracy in our opinion. We have followed the correct procedure outlined by DEP in the Stormwater Handbook and we meet the minimum requirement of the ponds draining in under 72 hours. 37. Oscillations should be managed with finer routing (smaller dt) We have used 0.05 hours for our time increment, (dt), which is recommended for rimes of concentration greater than or equal to 0.1 hours. Our finer routing value has been set at "3"which is also a recommended value for the model. It is important to note that oscillations can and will occur during a routing due to excess fluctuations in the outfloW. However, itis more important to check the hydrographs to see if they are reasonable. We have reviewed our hydrographs and it is our position that they do look reasonable. 38. If OCS structures are not located at ponds,Ponds should be routed through inlet culverts to OCS structure to determine if there is a hydraulic restriction on the up-gradient side, in addition to that modeled on the down-gradient side. We have used 0.05 hours for our time increment, (dt), which is recommended for times of concentration greater than or equal to 0.1 hours. Our finer routing value has been set at "3"which is also a recommended value for the model. It is important to note that oscillations can and will occur during a routing due to excess fluctuations in the outflow. However, it is more important to check the hydrographs to see if they are reasonable. We have reviewed our hydrographs and it is our position that they do look reasonable. 39. As the Cultec System is modeled to surcharge without another overflow,the drawdown time should include contributory pipe volume. We will include the contributory pipe volume in the calculations. 40. Grate analysis depicts a 4" pond at the South Ridge Circle cul-de-sac. This area should be modeled to insure that driveways do not take on water. These driveways slope towards the street and Would not experience ponding except at the apron. 41. Riprap to be size based on velocities. We will provide rip-rap sizing based on velocities. 42. Pipe network/ HY-8 model not provided for review. We will provide the pipe capacity analysis. 43. Un-witnessed soil tests to be witnessed prior to construction to confirm ESHW Several test would appear to have the potential for an ESHW closer to 7.5 feet as opposed to 10 feet. The term"Dominant Redox" should be clarified as ESHW delineation should includes reductions aslo. The soil tests were performed by a qualified Massachusetts licensed soil evaluator and Professional Engineer and Lund Surveyor. The groundzoater elevations are based on Redoximorhpic features which include oxidation and reduction of the Iron in the soil. We are confident in our methods for determining high groundwater but would agree to have the groundzoater elevation at the ponds zitnessed during construction. 44. Provide responsible party information on stormwater management system and components, (i.e. Home Owner's Association) It is our understanding that a condition of the planning board approval will be that the homeowners association will be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater system. 45. Construction period sediment deposits at erosion control devices to be removed at 1/3 height or 6 inches. We agree roith this condition. We look forward to discussing these matters with the Commission. Very Truly Yours, Richard L. Williams, P.E. Cc: Meninno Construction Project file: SALE-0026 & WILLIAMS SPARAGES WGINF , % NEU , SIIFMOn January 14, 2016 • Mr.Tom Devine, Senior Planner (1 City of Salem Department of Planning&Community Development �J 120 Washington Street,31 Floor Salem,MA 01970 RE: "The Woodlands"subdivision(Clark Avenue), Salem, MA DEP File No: 064-0607 Responses to Comments Dear Mr. Devine, The purpose of this letter is to respond to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection's(DEP's)project review comments regarding"The Woodlands"subdivision project located off of Clark Avenue. DEP's comments are shown below in italics and, our responses are in the bold text that follows. 1. The proponent should provide the pre and post peak rate discharges for Infiltration Basin 1, 3, and 4. We are uncertain of the meaning of this comment as the Basins are part of the proposed design and there are no pre-peak rate discharges for the Infiltration Basins mentioned as they currently do not exist. However,there are Performance Summary Tables which list the inflow,exfiltration,discharge and calculated water levels in the drainage analysis contained within the Notice of Intent(NOI) package. 2. The TSS Charts are incorrect; the design engineer took additional TSS credit. For example, an infiltration basin receives 80% TSS credit when combined with adequate pretreatment. The chart shows 25%credit for the CB and 80%for the basin. We understand the comment,however,the TSS Charts are correct and we will explain further for clarification. Infiltration Basins 1,2,3 and 4 each have deep sump catch basins and sediment forebays which provides 44% pretreatment prior to reaching the basin,see TSS Table found in Volume 1,Chapter 1,page 11 in Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. Therefore,the treatment chain is the Deep Sump catch basins which provide an initial 25%TSS removal followed by the sediment forebay and the infiltration basin acting together to provide an additional 80% TSS removal equaling a Total removal of 85% for the basin. See attached spreadsheets from the report. 3. The sediment forebays associated with basins 3 and 4 should be labeled. The forebays will be labeled on the revised plans. 189 North Main Street, Suite 101 • Middleton, MA 01949 9 Tel: (978) 539-8088 • www.wsengineers.com Response to Comments "The Woodlands", Salem, MA January 14, 2016 4. Details and cross-sections of each of the basins must be provided to demonstrate compliance with Standard 2, and 3. We will provide details and cross-sections of each of the basins. 5. The stormwater narrative says HSG C(0.25"runqffi will be used for the stormwater calculations; however, HSG B(0.35"runo1i7 was used for the Recharge Volume computations. We agree with this comment and this was done inadvertently. However,the number presented in our report is more conservative and demonstrates that the project is effective in providing more groundwater recharge volume than required. We will correct the calculations and submit for review,if requested. 6. The drawdown calculations are missing. The drawdown calculations are presented on sheet 10/20 of the DEP Compliance calculations section found in the drainage report. We have also revised the drawdown time calculation for the Cultec System in response to the review comments received from Mr. St. Louis of the Conservation Commission. 7. Snow stockpiling areas should be depicted on the plan. . This comment was addressed with the Planning Board,snow storage is to be at the proposed roadside as is typical for residential streets. It is important to note that all of the snow will be stored outside of the 100' buffer zone. 8. Who will be responsible for complying with the stormwater O&Mplan? This comment was also addressed with the Planning Board,the Applicant is willing to accept a condition that the responsibility of stormwater maintenance lies with the City of Salem or the Homeowner's Association.We will adjust the language in the documents as required. We look forward to discussing these matters with your commission at the January 14, 2016 hearing. Very Truly Yours, Richard L. Williams, P.E. Principal Cc: NSD Realty Trust DEP Northeast Region 2 V ' IRiST �, Verstoh f,#1uMritBiptJ%fital:'1,2008: r fi ark ' �, cGcT a�rQ 0 Ai M "� Im" t1 etectaF+# axe M1ile+ir �Aafec9lVlP+a>�.self�c�f�' n ^S �t�af�s *e�sn�t{��t��iplOt4 $ E d 1 leumTSS AmountBMW FteFnain ng fi k ttoxd C*L7 Load D-E L , �;2 ts o oa 0. r- 16 0 5 0 s�rat�FO " Needs o L Tatal3 TSS � �+RCe�t[f15�a:aat� TR-e'M + = 4410 uNet r M#?Tr�fn 0 a project Prepared Sy.: Date: `Equals remaining 10ad from previous BMP(E) Which enters tha3fv)P Nen-eucRliatpa ts:i�Se�utBPcn sheet; mrutbe a§bd��BMR f.M`nCFiF'M889D ;$},pITS1YYdtet- ,.` `' !a mass.Dept.crEmdmrunentatPrroteeckon V INSTRUCTIONS: 1. In BMP Column, click on Blue Cell to Activate Drop Down Menu Version 1,automated:Mar. a, 2008 2. Select BMP from Drop Down Menu 3.After BMP is selected, TSS Removal and other Columns are automatically completed. Location: B C D E F TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining .� BMP' Rate' Load* Removed C*D Load D-E d 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.75 7 U) S > L 1 0 0 0.80 0.75 0.60 0.15 L E y 0 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 0400 N t4 H 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 �{ V 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 Separate Form Needs to be Completed for Each Total TSS Removal = 85% Outlet or BMP Train Project: Prepared By: *Equals remaining load from previous BMP(E) In Date: r which enters the BMP r Nonautomated TSS Calculation Sheet must be used if Proprietary BMP Proposed ��v 1.From MassDEP Stormwater Handbook Vol. 1 Mass.Dept.of Environmental Protection q � 1 1 ,:WILLIAMS SPARAGES Project file: SALE-0026 „ „ , p NEM , ,„,,,QOM T January 29,20.16 S Mr. Tom Devine, Senior Planner City of Salem Department of Planning&Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3'd Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: "The Woodlands"subdivision(Clark Avenue), Salem, MA DEP File No: 064-0607 Further Responses to Conservation Commission Comments Dear Mr.Devine, The purpose of this letter is to further respond to the Conservation Commission's project review comments regarding"The Woodlands" subdivision project located off of Clark Avenue. The commission's comments are shown below,our January 14, 2016 responses are in italic text and our further responses are in the bold text that follows. Plan Set 1. Vertical Datum to be confirmed. Benchmarks to be set prior to construction to an established datum. Agreed. Benchmarks will be set as part of the construction layout. No further response required at this time. 2. Sheet 1,note 10-There are several drain lines set at less than 0.5%.Suggest note revision or OCS configuration revision. The note will be revised accordingly. See note on definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 3. Clarify use of Lot 27. Lot 27 has no proposed use at this time and it is not residentially zoned. Any further work on this property will require applicable permits to be filed. No further response required at this time. 189 North Main Street, Suite 101 9 Middleton, MA 01949 • Tel: (978) 539-8088 • www.wsengineers.com Response to Conservation Commission comments T 'The Woodlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 4. Access to open space appears limited.No direct access appears provided to lots 12-18&23- 25.Suggest access along lots 06-17&06-19 and street access via South Ridge Circle. Access is proposed directly from the project sidewalks. There has been an additional access/path added to the Open Space 2 parcel. It is preferred not to build paths that lead to the private homeowners' yards. No further response required at this time. 5. Is full cul-de-sac circle included on site,with additional land added to street layout?Confirm City property has minimum frontage for access? Full cul-de-sac is provided on site.All building lots are provided with minimum frontage. Other lots have sufficient frontage for proposed uses. No further response required at this time. 6. Due to the substantial amount of grading required for this project(+20 foot cuts and+2-foot fills)construction period erosion controls,stockpiles,and storm water management should be provided to confirm appropriate care is undertaken during construction to prevent sediment migration. The Project documents include a construction period prevention plan and contain provisions for erosion controls.A NPDES Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is required and will have provisions for implementation and regular monitoring of construction controls. No further response required at this time. 7. Grading of woodlands road to be provided with additional detail from 10+50 to end as contours appear orphaned with grading required off-site. Existing profiles grades also are not depicted. The roadway at 10+50 matches the contour at the abutting property. The existing grades are not shown but can be added to the plan if deemed necessary. The existing centerline and sideline grade lines are shown to scale on the profile and the contours are shown on the plan. We find that numerically showing the proposed grades alongside the existing can lead to unnecessary confusion. No further response required at this time. 8. Additional spot shots to be provided at Lot 12 to detail overflow from Pond 1. We will add additional spot elevations to the plans. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. Response to Conservation Commission comments ' 'The Woodlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 9. 18"HDPE from STA 1+74 to pond follows property line and may be subject to damage from road monument installation and possible fence line installation.Suggest RCP or relocation off-center. We will relocate the pipe slightly to the northeast in order to avoid conflicts with the street monumentation. We don't expect fencing to be an issue given the depth of the pipe. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 10. Drainage easements to provide 30 foot minimum width. The easements have been provided in accordance with the provisions of the subdivision regulations which require a minimum width of 20 feet. No further response required at this time. 11. Outlet control structure orifice sizing to be 4-inch minimum. (pond 2 specifically) The outlet control size is based on the required size to mitigate the peak flow rate in that direction. The 100 year storm flow rate Q=5.47 cfs. If the concern is clogging, we will specify a perforated PVC tee to ensure that the orifice operates as intended. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 12. Detail flow path of outfall from Pond 2 off-site as it does not appear to be directed toward the northern wetlands but rather across the buffer zone toward Lot 07-0008. The runoff does discharge to the wetland but, like the runoff in the existing condition, discharges over upland areas first. If desired, the flow could be further spread. No further response required at this time. 13. Double catch basin at the end of Woodlands Road would appear to be aligned with a driveway access to City land. Drainage inlets should be avoided at driveway openings/curb cuts. No curb cut is proposed at that location. There is not a need to create one at that point and no traffic, other than foot traffic is proposed. No further response required at this time. 14. Culvert Outlet from Pond 2 disagrees with HydroCAD. Revise. We are not certain what is not in agreement. The plans call for a 12"culvert with an inlet invert at 127.5 and an outlet end at 127.0 which matches the HydroCAD information. No further response required at this time. Response to Conservation Commission comments "The wdodlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 15. Pond 3 forebay connection to infiltration pond 3 appears somewhat irregular. Please clarify. The outlet from the forebay allows the design to better accommodate the existing grades and areas of available soil depth. We feel it allows for reduced site disturbance within the buffer zone. No further response required at this time. 16. Label wetland flags at pocket wetlands 'B' and'C'. Provide total SF/volume or areas. The flag designations at isolated wetland areas "b"and "c"will be added to the plan and the storage volume ofeach will also be added. The areas are approximately one half the requirement to be qualified as jurisdictional. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 17. All reference to'Hay' to be replaced with'Straw'. The plans will be amended as requested. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 18. Provide a construction entrance detail,and typical trench detail. The construction entrance detail will be added to the plans. There is a utility trench detail on sheet 9. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 19. Each row of the infiltration system to be provided with an inspection port at each end. The inspection reports will be added as requested. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 20. Maximum slopes to be 3:1 unless otherwise addition stabilization provided above and beyond typical loam&seed practices. Riprap detail to specify crushed stones size. We agree. The rip-rap detail will be amended to include the size of the crushed stone (3/4"-1 t/2"). See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 21. Open Space markers should be incorporated into the design at the rear property lines. Lot comer s of open space lots should also be monumented. We are willing to have that discussion,however it should be noted that the rear property lines are outside the 100'buffer zone. Response to Conservation Commission comments ' 'The W6odlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 No further response required at this time. 22. Trail detail at 3-inch minus appears heavy. Request similar cross section to other City projects underway. Per discussions with the planning board, the path will be less intrusive and will simply be cleared and the wood chips from the clearing operation will be used to surface the path. See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. 23. Outlet control structures should be relocated to ponds for readily available visual inspection of any clogs, trash,or other debris.Culvert routing to OCS structure appear unwarranted as they are not utilized for attenuation. The outlet control structures are accessible for inspection. They are on the berms so are accessible during pond flooding and are provided with manhole covers for access. It has been our experience that routing to the OCS structure makes for a more accurate model. We feel the method should remain See definitive plan set revised through January 22,2016. Application and Stormwater package 24. Provide HydroCAD nodes and design points on watershed plans. We will update the watershed Maps to reflect the HydroCAD nodes and design points. See Watershed set revised through January 29,2016. 25. Minimum Tc =6 minutes The original study provided a Minimum Tc=5 minutes which we have no reason to believe should be amended. However, we had have rerun the model with a Minimum Tc=6 minutes. The result is negligible and continues to show mitigation of the project effects. The revised summary table is attached. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 26. Does the current ORAD remain valid or is it expired? There is not a current ORAD. The wetlands were reflagged for this application. No further response required at this time. 27. Clarify why Category 313,3C,Category 6 do not apply on the transmittal form? Category 3B is for buildings within the Buffer Zone and there are none on this project Response to Conservation Commission comments .' "The Wbodlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 Category 3C is for roadway within the Buffer Zone and there is none on this project. Category 6 is for a project where the only item in the application is wetland delineation. It is DEP's policy that a notice of intent for work is being filed, the fee is only for the activity applied for. No further response required at this time. 28. CPPP inspection form duplicates 'forebay'column. The form will be revised accordingly. See attached form revised through December 20,2015. 29. If isolated pocket wetlands W and'C' are to be used to hold stormwater,drainage easement should be provided as necessary. Note, discharge is proposed to increase to these on-site resources. Those areas are not proposed to hold stormwater any differently than they currently do. No construction is proposed on lot 27. We may anticipate easements if there werefuture development on this lot. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 30. Wetlands B&C(nodes 130L&141L) should be modeled as ponds to determine if they surcharge to the southern property design point. We will revise the model to include these ponds but don't expect that the change will make an appreciable difference. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 31. All closed drainage system components should at a minimum be designed to the 25-year storm event,specifically surcharging components. (Majority of analysis appears to use 100- year storm in.calculations) We are not sure of the meaning of this comment. However, we believe that our design provides protection to the project lots and abutting properties in the 100 year storm, which is our intention. No further response required at this time. 32. Pond 2 summary sheet to review culvert size for consistency with plans and calculations. We did not find any discrepancies with the culvert sizing, however, we will correct the typo calling for the bottom of the berm to be 128.5,and, in place thereof, specify the bottom of berm at elevation 128.0 No further response required at this time. Response to Conservation Commission comments '"The Wobdlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 33. Southern flow to the southern property line should be broken out. [Ex-3 to be compared to proposed pond 3, Ex3r,and any overflow from modeled wetlands 'B' and'C'. Provide summary table of pre-post conditions. We will compare the nodes as requested in a revised summary table. See previous comment regarding isolated wetlands. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 34. If the Cultec system will be designed to surcharge to the street, the street closed drainage system should be modeled in the subdivision. The Clark Avenue closed system should also be checked for capacity. As can be seen on the summary tables, the project will actually reduce the amount of flow to the existing drainage system in Clark Avenue and was done intentionally so that we would not have to model the performance of the existing system. It is our position that since we are reducing the peak flow rates to Clark Avenue,we are reducing the impact on the system, and therefore,a capacity analysis is not warranted. No further response required at this time. 35. Provide hydrographs for all stormwater ponds. Stormwater Pond hydrographs will be provided as requested. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 36. System to be modeled through 64-hours based on draw down times for full volumes. We disagree with this comment as a typical practice for the time span is that it should be long enough to cover all of the flow of interest. The design storm is based on 24 hours, increasing the model to cover 64 hours will not increase accuracy in our opinion. We have followed the correct procedure outlined by DEP in the Stormwater Handbook and we meet the minimum requirement of the ponds draining in under 72 hours. No further response required at this time. 37. Oscillations should be managed with finer routing(smaller dt) We have used 0.05 hours for our time increment (dt),which is recommended for times of concentration greater than or equal to 0.1 hours. Our finer routing value has been set at "3"which is also a recommended value for the model. It is important to note that oscillations can and will occur during a routing due to excess fluctuations in the outflow. However, it is more important to check the hydrographs to see if they are reasonable. We have reviewed our hydrographs and it is our position that they do look reasonable. No further response required at this time. I Response to Conservation Commission comments "The Wobdlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 38. If OCS structures are not located at ponds,Ponds should be routed through inlet culverts to OCS structure to determine if there is a hydraulic restriction on the up-gradient side,in addition to that modeled on the down-gradient side. The following comment was inadvertently omitted from the January 14,2016 response letter. The purpose for the level 18" HDPE inlet pipes are to provide a uniform flow from the pond into the outlet control structure where the proposed orifice(s)will then allow a desired flow rate to discharge through the culvert in order to mitigate the pre and post peak rates of runoff. This is a simple and effective method that we have employed on many similar projects in the area as the 18" diameter pipe is large enough as to not provide any hydraulic restriction and will allow the orifice(s) that are specifically designed for that pond to function as intended. 39. As the Cultec System is modeled to surcharge without another overflow,the drawdown time should include contributory pipe volume. We will include the contributory pipe volume in the calculations. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 40. Grate analysis depicts a 4" pond at the South Ridge Circle cul-de-sac. This area should be modeled to insure that driveways do not take on water. These driveways slope towards the street and would not experience ponding except at the apron. No further response required at this time. 41. Riprap to be size based on velocities. We will provide rip-rap sizing based on velocities. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 42. Pipe network/ HY-8 model not provided for review. We will provide the pipe,capacity analysis. Although we performed an HY-8 analysis and included it in our Stormwater Report dated August 31,2015 revised to November 10,2015,we have also updated our HydroCAD model to include each drainage structure in ensure that we selected the appropriate pipe sizes. The revised HydroCAD model uses the Dynamic Storage-Indication(DSI) Method which re-evaluates outlet devices at each time step and allows ponds to respond to varying tailwater. This also calculates the headwater elevations associated with the ponds and allows us to determine that the pipe sizes are appropriately sized and no adverse impact on the upstream stormwater conditions i.e.surcharging of the catch basin grate or Response to Conservation Commission comments .'The Woodlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 manhole cover. See the attached 11"x17" diagram which summarizes each structure,the pipe size and location in the system. 43. Un-witnessed soil tests to be witnessed prior to construction to confirm ESHW several test would appear to have the potential for an ESHW closer to 7.5 feet as opposed to 10 feet. The term"Dominant Redox"should be clarified as ESHW delineation should include reductions also. The soil tests were performed by a qualified Massachusetts licensed soil evaluator and Professional Engineer and land Surveyor. The groundwater elevations are based on Redoximorhpic features which include oxidation and reduction of the Iron in the soil. We are confident in our methods for determining high groundwater but would agree to have the groundwater elevation at the ponds witnessed during construction. No further response required at this time. 44. Provide responsible party information on stormwater management system and components, (i.e. Home Owner's Association) It is our understanding that a condition of the planning board approval will be that the homeowners association will be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater system. No further response required at this time. 45. Construction period sediment deposits at erosion control devices to be removed at 1/3 height or 6 inches. We agree with this condition. No further response required at this time. Additional Information: We have also included cross-sections and details of each of the basins that were requested in item 4 of our January 14,2016 letter to Tom Devine. We look forward to discussing these matters with the Commission. Very T s, Richard L.Wi 'ams,P.E. Principal. Cc: Meninno Construction I CA M M`1i'✓ITS 1'1 � 11S 50-FT LONG .. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 o° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °oooooooooooo waN0w° 0 ° ° ° 0 ° ° ° ° ° 0000000000000000 00000000o 00000 °0°0°000000000p00°0°0°0°0 °0°000000000 °0°0°000° ° ° ° ° ° O ° ° °00000000 000000000000000000000 0O0O0O00°O°O°O°0°O°o°O°0°0 00000000oo000000 000000p000000 O OO0000000 O 00000000I 0 0 0 0 0 0 USE CRUSHED STONE PLAN VIEW GREATER THAN 3-INCHES BUT SMALLER THAN 6-INCHES O00000 0000000000 000000 12" EXISTING GRADE SECTION VIEW CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE D ETAI L (NOT TO SCALE) �� Z Q 2x2 x3' WOODEN STAKE g (5' O.C.) "v STRAW WATTLE (12" MIN) GROUND SURFACE � z STAKED STRAW WATTLE DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) G o w►wtj►pf Zia. The Woodlands (Clark Avenue) Revised December 20, 2015 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT FORM TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 14 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER Inspector: Date: Inspector's Title: Days Since Last Rainfall: Amount of Last Rainfall: Infiltration Basins Condition of Condition of How Much Forebay Basin Sediment Buildup Description Side Slopes Side Slopes Circle one minor/ moderate / major minor/ moderate / major minor[moderate /major minor/ moderate / major minor/ moderate / major Maintenance Required: To Be Performed By: On or Before: WILLIAMS 191 South Main Street, Suite 103 SPARAGES Middleton, MA 01949 (978) 539-8088 Office Twww.wsengineers.com S Rem ►5= To 77Can�.�e-kr' 3 4- lit i 11G� �9 �IoE�✓ I -lT .iu� 01 e-4 _.�. �€ .1 `.�� _�1�'[O ,"�'+'��s-c S�'►.r._��.oS�"��t� Ifts7✓rni�1_y {T��,�a�S�r5,t1-.�t i qtr vw� ��5,.'y -r---- 1(G-�{� 2t- _1Z ( t � _ !, II L i E i : - / — _T_ I� _...Y 7-1 7-7 9 � p ! N F L4 / o%.3 'toww v 1 OL) IL StvNt_0, / N" (S•!e&t 0,,,,atc,.. STONE WEIGHT, IN POUNDS 26 1 510 401 100 200 4006 8001 15020 3000 40001 12:1 or 24 bottom 4:1 3:1 22 -2:1 20 0 18 Z 0 uiU Is Coll-IGt.�c�o.1t w 0. f 14 /_ 11 �✓I�f►4 w GY LL S-lo�-1r P-6s. Z 12 . It 10 �� '�iovl o�p 0 FOR STONE WEIGHING 165 LBS. PER CU.FT. 8 . Qf�- !o•(o 6 ADAPTED FROM REPORT OF SUBCOMMITTE ON SLOPE 4 PROTECTION, AM. SOC. CIVIL ENGINEERS PROC. JUNE 1948 2 O 0 2 3 4 EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL DIAMETER OF STONE, IN FEET FIG. 2-SIZE OF STONE THAT WILL RESIST DISPLACEMENT FOR VARIOUS VELOCITIES AND SIDE SLOPES 11-6 Hydraulic Analysis Report Project Data Project Title: Designer: Project Date: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 Project Units: U.S. Customary Units Notes: Channel Analysis: Infiltration Pond 1 Notes: Input Parameters Channel Type: Circular Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 it Longitudinal Slope:0.0100 Wit Manning's n: 0.0100 Flow: 4.0300 cis Result Parameters Depth:0.7214 it Area of Flow:0.6066 ftA2 Wetted Perimeter: 2.0295 ft Average Velocity:6.6432 ft/s Top Width: 0.8966 ft Froude Number: 1.4233 Critical Depth: 0.8501 it Critical Velocity: 5.6633 ft/s Critical Slope: 0.0071 Wit Critical Top Width: 0.7140 ft Calculated Max Shear Stress: 0.4502 Ib/itA2 Calculated Avg Shear Stress: 0.1865 Ib/tA2 100 %i R- Wyroav-o. / M : 4.q4' -C?s avwt4' STONE WEIGHT, IN POUNDS 26 1 510 40 I 100 200 40060 800 00 1502000 3000 4000100 12:1 or 24 bottom 4:1 22 3:1 •2:1 20 p 18 Z I:I 0 U W (n 16 w w 14 W LL 12 L- 10 A 12 U N J► o FOR STONE WEIGHING 'P6ov�Q1�D W > 8 165 LBS. PER CU.FT. 0 6 ADAPTED FROM REPORT OF SUBCOMMITTE ON SLOPE 4 PROTECTION, AM. SOC. CIVIL ENGINEERS PROC. JUNE 1948 2 O G 41 1 2 3 EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL DIAMETER OF STONE, IN FEET 4 FIG. 2-SIZE OF STONE THAT WILL RESIST DISPLACEMENT FOR VARIOUS VELOCITIES AND SIDE SLOPES u-6 Hydraulic Analysis Report Project Data Project Title: Designer: Project Date: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 Project Units: U.S. Customary Units Notes: Channel Analysis: Infiltration Pond 2 Notes: Input Parameters Channel Type: Circular Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 ft Longitudinal Slope: 0.0310 ft/ft Manning's n: 0.0100 Flow: 0.3000 cfs Result Parameters Depth: 0.1311 ft Area of Flow: 0.0608 ftA2 Wetted Perimeter: 0.7410 ft Average Velocity: 4.9381 ft/s Top Width: 0.6751 ft Froude Number:2.9008 Critical Depth: 0.2256 ft Critical Velocity: 2.2597 ft/s Critical Slope: 0.0034 ft/ft Critical Top Width: 0.8359 ft Calculated Max Shear Stress: 0.2536 Ib/ft^2 Calculated Avg Shear Stress: 0.1586 Ib/ftA2 IKI P F-W a rza 4er INn L�Tv 1bv 'SILIJ 3 loownu slok wk /Nr= 10. 29 ave STONE WEIGHT, IN POUNDS 26 1 510 401 100 200 40061 8001 1502000 3 1 4000 00 12:I or 24 bottom 4:1 22 3:1 •2:1 20 1 p 18 Z 1:1 0 U I w (' 16 cr �kw5(aa w a w 14 ` 2" w LL w 2 12 to �111.tt�Q U o FOR STONE WEIGHING w 165 LBS. PER CU.FT. > 8 6 ADAPTED FROM REPORT OF SUBCOMMITTE ON SLOPE 4 PROTECTION, AM. SOC. CIVIL ENGINEERS PROC. JUNE 1948 2 0 0 I 2 ' 3 EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL DIAMETER OF STONE, IN FEET 4 FIG. 2-SIZE OF STONE THAT WILL RESIST DISPLACEMENT fOR VARIOUS VELOCITIES AND SIDE SLOPES 11-6 Hydraulic Analysisp Report Project Data Project Title: Designer: Project Date: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 Project Units: U.S. Customary Units Notes: Channel Analysis: Infiltration Pond 3 Notes: Input Parameters Channel Type: Circular Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 ft Longitudinal Slope: 0.0500 ft/ft Manning's n: 0.0100 Flow: 2.0700 cfs Result Parameters Depth:0.3032 It Area of Flow: 0.2011 ftA2 Wetted Perimeter: 1.1662 ft Average Velocity: 10.2944 ftls Top Width: 0.9193 ft Froude Number: 3.8789 Critical Depth: 0.6143 It Critical Velocity:4.0913 ft/s Critical Slope: 0.0041 ft/ft Critical Top Width: 0.9735 ft Calculated Max Shear Stress:0.9459 Ib/ftA2 Calculated Avg Shear Stress: 0.5380 Ib/ft^2 4--k "1'�ArP 51,E .i STONE WEIGHT, IN POUNDS 26 I 510 401 100 200 40060 gpp 00 1500000 3000 4000100 12:1 or 24 bottom 4:1 22 3:1 •2:I 20 0 18 Z I:I 0 U W U) 16 of W o_ w 14 (0~STe.J� W 'fl i vrr+� �G61'D LL 2 12 �' fG vN Ns , 10tO�ep U wFOR STONE WEIGHING O>L 165 LBS. PER CU. FT. 8 6 ADAPTED FROM REPORT OF SUBCOMMITTE ON SLOPE 4 PROTECTION, AM. SOC. CIVIL ENGINEERS,PROC. JUNE 1948 2 0 OEQUIVALAOT"SPHERICAL DIAMETER OF STONE, IN FEET 4 FIG* 2-SIZE OF STONE THAT WILL RESIST DISPLACEMENT FOR VARIOUS VELOCITIES AND SIDE SLOPES 11-6 Hydraulic Analysis Report Project Data Project Title: Designer: Project Date: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 Project Units: U.S. Customary Units Notes: Channel Analysis: Infiltration Pond 4 Notes: Input Parameters Channel Type: Circular Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 ft Longitudinal Slope:0.0385 Wit Manning's n: 0.0100 Flow: 2.3800 cis Result Parameters Depth: 0.3492 ft Area of Flow: 0.2443 ft^2 Wetted Perimeter: 1.2645 ft Average Velocity: 9.7435 ft/s Top Width: 0.9535 ft Froude Number: 3.3924 Critical Depth: 0.6602 It Critical Velocity:4.3267 ft/s Critical Slope: 0.0044 ft/ft Critical Top Width: 0.9473 ft Calculated Max Shear Stress: 0.8390 Ib/f A2 Calculated Avg Shear Stress: 0.4641 Ib/ft^2 Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 111 24-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 06611 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (Subsurface Infiltration System) Hydrograph - - ®Inflow ose ®Outflow Inflow' Are 971 sf ®Discarded 0.75 ®Secondary 0.7 7 0.65 ` beak Elev-,1-23.96- 0.6 0.55 #orage-1 ,640 cf 0.5 :......- _ :_. _ 0.45 0.4 0 0.35 0.25 ___:..... �i. -... 0.2 ' .,' i --... 0.15 0.1 tial Vis" 0.. om ae- 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 11124-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (Subsurface Infiltration System) Hydrograph - ®Inflow rns a. ®outflow 1rlfldw..Area=14,971_.'.sf_ ®Discarded ®Secondary Peak Elev=125.41 ' Storage=3,1221cf LL t}.e1.CT0` U:W E6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition - The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 11124-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Pond 78P: Proposed CULTEC 330XL (Subsurface Infiltration System) Hydrograph ®Inflow ®outflow 2 - Inflow Area-14,971 sf ded ®Secondary Peak Elev=127.86' Storage=3,449 cf___ o : LL :eeldr. fl 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 11124-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Pond 142P: Detention Pond 1 Hydrograph ®Inflow ®Outflow Inflow Area=60,064 sf 0PDad rimar P maty ®Secondary 2 Peak Elev=134.10' =2,317 cf Storage 44ti<fe"" 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2 Hydrograph ._._ ®Inflow ®OuHlow Inflow Area: sf 11Primarytl ®secondary 2 Peak EI'ev=129.30' Storage�3,348 'cf LL i014otdl'. um 0 , 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 11124-hr 2 yr Rainfall=3.10" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4 Hydrograph ®Inflow aae Outflow inflow-Area=67,659 Sf - ® ry ®DlscarPrima ®Secondary Peak El;ev 119.36. 3 , St6rage=3,840 cf b LL A:00'cfe. 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3 Hydrograph InFlow za . ®OuHlow - ■Discarded nfaow.-Area=57,305 sf- ®Prima ®Sewndary Peak Elev=116.06' 2 St6rage=2,70,0 d ----- 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 111 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Pond 142P: Detention Pond 1 Hydrograph ®Inflow 31«h ®o^mow ®Discarded nflow Area 60,054 sf ®Primary ewndary 4 . Peak E Plev=134.73' Storage=3,477 ;cf 3- ' y 'm �. N I " c 2 % __.. S 1 fl 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2 Hydrograph ,a.35oro. ®Outflow ®Discarded Inflow /area=44,298 sf ®Seco^dory Perak EIev=130.12' 3 Storace=6,'135 cf 012 3 o LL 1 : QZ1 tlfs 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 111 24-hr 10 yr Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4 Hydrograph ®Inflow " ®Outflow inflow Area=67 659 sf ®Discarded Primary 6 ®Secondary Peak Elev=1202-1'- Storage=6,449 cf 4- ............ 3 3 o 2 f.32 de= 1 @ a.. Q 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Pond 15213: Detention Pond 3 Hydrograph ,'-- ■Inflow .. `-...`..... ®Outflo ow Area' =57 sf ®Di�"r- 101ded ®Primary ®Secondary Peak- E-lev=1 'i6:60'---- Stora ge=4,396 cf -------------- 30 2 i i.... „ .�..._..... LL varus=: ' 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition -The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 111 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pond 142P: Detention Pond 1 Hydrograph ®Inflow - - ®Outflow nfl -- ®Discarded o I w Area=60,064 sf ®SPrima ewndary Peak Elev-135.33' 6 5 , <.ad; Storage=4,828 cf 4 ------------- LL 3- ' 2 a:ao;3; 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Pond 143P: Detention Pond 2 Hydrograph ®Inflow Swede- CIOutFl0 Inflow Area=44,298 sf ®DI�ry ®D,Primary7rd 6 ®Secondary - Peak E-I!ev 1-31---20' -- 5 Storage=10,561 cf 4 _o 3 iL 2 : sae..... OR I 1 m2d; 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Proposed Watershed Condition - The Woodlands Revised January 29, 2016 proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Type 111 24-hr 100 yr Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 2/2/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 06611 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Pond 144P: Detention Pond 4 Hydrograph -' - - - - - ®Inflow 851da : ®OutflOW low Area: if ®Pnsmcaa dyed ®Secondary In 9 . _ Peak EI.,eV . .21 .06. Storage=9 $77 cf 6 y, 5 3 o 3 , 7%da. . .._. ... ...... . ... .... 2 As 1 ' OOOfle+ 0 2 4 6 6 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) Pond 152P: Detention Pond 3 Hydrograph '. '. ■Inflow :e!sgcrs: _ ®Outflow - ' - 13caed PrimaryY # owea=57,305f ®Secondary Peak E1',,,e 1-17-0-35, Stora9' e=7,090 `cf 5 ' 4- ------- u 3- 2 1 O�df1d'i.-. 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Time (hours) GoMK� 45 sOT.HER CONTROLS(continued)av Offsite'VeliicleiT.rackin �. w= Construction entrance and exit shall be via Clark Avenue. ' �" � MING<OF.;CONTROLS7=MEASURES; ; _ .�f' As indicated in the Sequence of Major Activities, the installation of erosion and sediment control devices shall be in place prior to earth excavating activities. . .;�FICATJON.(OF�OM.PLiANCENVITH FEDERAL;STATE;AND L'OCj9L;REGULATIONS F The stormwater pollution prevention plan reflects the requirements of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(MGL c.131, section 40). There is no wetland filling associated with this project. It is strictly a buffer zone project. Note that there are no other applicable State or Federal requirements for sediment and erosion control plans (or permits), or stormwater management plans (or permits) required for this project to the best of our knowledge. ±� ]NTENIANCIE/INSPECTION1°ROCEDURES u� �WAV bs 04*nd.Sedifnent�Gontrol jns on ego$Aaintenance:Pracbi *s ReviW.December'20,}2015 w The following items represent the inspection and maintenance practices that will be used to maintain sediment and erosion control for"The Woodlands"subdivision project. 1. All control measures shall be inspected at least once every fourteen (14)days and following any storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. 2. All measures shall be maintained in good working order; if a repair is necessary, it shall be initiated within 24 hours of the report. 3. Built up sediment shall be removed from sift fencing when it has reached one-third the height of the fence, or six(6") inches. 4. Sift fence shall be inspected for depth of sediment,tears, to see if the fabric is securely attached to the fence posts, and to see that the fence posts are firmly set in the ground. 6. The catch basin grates shall be inspected for grate elevation relative to current surface condition; condition of finer fabric, and degree to which sediment has accumulated on the grate and in the sump of the catch basin. Response to Conservation Commission comments ' 'The Woodlands"Proposed Cluster Subdivision Clark Avenue January 29,2016 No further response required at this time. 28. CPPP inspection form duplicates 'forebay'column. The form will be revised accordingly. See attached form revised through December 20,2015. 29. If isolated pocket wetlands 'B'and 'C' are to be used to hold stormwater,drainage easement should be provided as necessary. Note, discharge is proposed to increase to these on-site resources. Those areas are not proposed to hold stormwater any differently than they currently do. No construction is proposed on lot 27. We may anticipate easements if there were future development on this lot. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 30. Wetlands B&C (nodes 130L&141L) should be modeled as ponds to determine if they surcharge to the southern property design point. We will revise the model to include these ponds but don't expect that the change will make an appreciable difference. See Mitigative Drainage Analysis revised through January 29,2016. 31. All closed drainage system components should at a minimum be designed to the 25-year storm event;specifically surcharging components. (Majority of analysis appears to use 100- year storm in calculations) We are not sure of the meaning of this comment. However, we believe that our design provides protection to the project lots and abutting properties in the 100 year storm, which is our intention. No further response required at this time. 32. Pond 2 summary sheet to review culvert size for consistency with plans and calculations. We did not find any discrepancies with the culvert sizing, however, we will correct the typo calling for the bottom of the berm to be 128.5,and, in place thereof, specify the bottom of berm at elevation 128.0 No further response required at this time. 33. Southern flow to the southern property line should be broken out. [Ex-3 to be compared to proposed pond 3,Ex3r,and any overflow from modeled wetlands 'B' and 'C'. Provide summary table of pre-post conditions. We will compare the nodes as requested in a revised summary table. See previous comment regarding isolated wetlands. 7A+�tv�w 14-, 2= �10 KE�Pa�brc -m cow tr 9- AeV ' I 4 / 2Cupn n �� OJ i IIilli I ^ �jCLo JI_ J II I II II 11 J d u u I 0I it it �-II -II IOv to� IF L' IL -11 'JI_ JLIt J ^) APP R LL o R z go 00 M O 0/ O TRAN 2014 NLOT 12 REALTY TRUST N \S 06-0019 i 3 c a "s'q INSPECTION PORTS TO GRADE AT END OF EACH ROW TOP of RETAINING o I I WALL O 132.35 _ � II II II II II L vL II II II II � II i1�ll II II II II II II PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT II II II II o AREA [HydroCAD POND 78P] I u (SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION STRUCTURE) II II II 11 II (40) CULTEC 330XL CHAMBERS II II II II II _ TOP OF STONE=125.94 I I I a` TOP OF CHAMBERS-125.44 I I I 3 12' INV IN=124'33 II II II II II o BOTTOM OF CHAMBERS-122.91D BOTTOM OF STONE-122.40 (INSTALL INSPECTION PORTS AT d THE END OF EACH ROW) c POND 78P PROFILE NOTE WALL SHOWN IS GRAPHICAL (SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION) DEPICTION ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1"=20' HOR NO E.S.H.G.W.T. 1 "=4' VERT ENCOUNTERED DOWN Q TO 122'± DATUM ELEVATION=120.00 w J a ll -- _ �\_ �` �i 152 .,-- c� a \ • \�� I , -�- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 11q-61 1 I <--�_� 44 _ 1 'y 4 T \ 14� ---�- ____ 142 ---_ __- 132 --� �---- _, �r 00 3 � r INFILTRATION BASIN 1 - ---� 132 -- ,fig' 134 --___-- 1 If 136.5 - 136 's �p � - J N PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE POND 142P PROFILE 4" ORIFICE ® 132.75 (INFILTRATION BASIN 2) 80"ORIFICE ORI ICE ®134.00 134.50 SCALE: 1 "=20' HOR 12" RCP INV.=131.50 1 "=4' VERT INFILTRATION BASIN 1 N (HydroCAD Pond 142P) TOP OF BERM=136.5 L=54.5'1 o PROPOSED FES BOTTOM OF BERM=132.0 18" INV=132.40 81 EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ® 136.0 n i PROPOSED GRADE RIP RAP PROP. 18" =132.75 ° 's LEVEL) TOP OF FOREBAY=133.0 41 SPILLWAY ® 132.5 _ Q — a BOTTOM OF FOREBAY=131.0 NO E.S.H.G.W.T. ENCOUNTERED DOWN v NO E.S.H.G.W.T. TO 129.0 ENCOUNTERED DOWN No TO 125.0 w �] DATUM ELEVATION=125.00 a vi c� — '? 32 132.5 -- 132.5 / -- ��-- 132 N �G 49 I C 129.5 NFI LTRAT/ ,3 \ _ ON 8 ggS/N 2 sr 130 _, i / —7� 15" HDPE DRAIN PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE INV=133.00 RIM=132.83 _ 2.5" ORIFICE ® 128.50 EXISTINGGRADE 12" RCP INV. OUT=127.50 _ P SEDIMENT FOREBAY _ \ERNCY o TOP=130.0 132.0 � 4'L SPILLWAY ® 129.5 9A BOTTOM=128.0 INFILTRATION BASIN 2 (HydroCAD Pond 143P)TOP OF BERM=132.58' HDPEBOTTOM OF BERM=128.0 °RA" ED 12"S=LEVEL =127.0PROPOSED GRADERIP RAPNO E.S.H.G.W.T. RIP RAP ENCOUNTERED DOWNAPRONTO 123.0 POND 143P PROFILE(INFILTRATION BASIN 2) SCALE: 1 "=20' HOR 1 "=4' VERT DATUM ELEVATION=120.00 ELNE X24 720 `\� , ` \� \ 17 a � �\ @ ESF �\ I N FI LTRANO N BAM 3 Ike - ----------- 1 -151-- 10, 118 �� /---- 1 18. LL --- 1 12 -----1 1 - M r POND 152P PROFILE / (INFILTRATION BASIN 3) SCALE: 1 "=20' HOR 1 "=4' VERT PROPOSED FES 12" INV=126.50 INTO SEDIMENT FOREBAY PROP. CONTROL INFILTRATION BASIN 3 / TOP=126.0 STRUCTURE RIM=118.83 (HydroCAD Pond 152P) 41 SPILLWAY ® 125.5 �I 8" ORIFICE ® 115.50 TOP OF BERM=118.5 Al BOTTOM-124.0 ° 12" RCP INV.=113.50 BOTTOM OF BERM=115.0 E 81 EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ® 118.0 / Qv s PROPOSED 18" / �P Li INV=115.50 / (SEf LEVEL) 12" FES HDPE INV.=113.00 ,PRO GRADE o W/RIP RAP i i i /GRPpE E 551NG v a � _o DATUM ELEVATION=110.0 U N NO E.S.H.G.W.T. ENCOUNTERED w DOWN TO 108'± a REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED AT 107'± vi a 100, �, ------ L0�--------------� _ _ —— 12 ---- 122 122.5\��\ ------ 121 .5 — 120 _O — — -----� Tf� ID — 1 18 INFILTRATION BASIN 4 1 17 EW� aEVED __-- ----- 1 18 ------ ------------- ---------- ------------ BS= 122 - PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE RIM=122.83 18" LEVEL ® 118.00 6" ORIFICE ® 118.00 PROPOSED FES a 8" ORIFICE ® 120.50 18" INV-122.00 IN s 12" HDPE INV.=114.50INFILTRATION BASIN 4 TOP OF FOREBAY-122.0 41 SPILLWAY 0 121.5 (HydrOCAD Pond 144P) BOTTOM-120.0 ° TOP OF BERM=122.5%PROPOSED BOTTOM OF BERM=117.0 8'L EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ® 122.0 18" EXISTING GRADE 118.0 LENFL) — i PROPOSED GRADE v � POND 144P PROFILE No E.S.H.G.W.T-OBSERVED/ (INFILTRATION BASIN 4) o NO E.S.H.G.W.T. ENCOUNTERED REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED AT 113' SCALE: 1 "=20' HOR DOWN TO 110'± 1 "=4' VERT DATUM ELEVATION=110.0 i u i too 'As. SeaMh P1\►C- C �1 -ry 5�r'11✓.A�-`( Fllo� _a t WA*v1^/StL Of— glwKr %#AWL IAL oft W'4te S1J..0C.tve etc p'C' VC ?toe coma to A10fa96-Am t� ?r;::P?c0Ae - C> c0v-He0r 4 1, PR-CB O+OLT CB Ste 0+0 Lt � 3J6md area LM 12 12 n rot: 5SrWFA r5 Qt't4kx 13q •t09 • �L 9v16.11ap IGIt. 2,10 15i@, No 5%A40I111.61V6 ; OK DMH Ste. ONO Proposed C LTEC V r9'11iR.M{�j Owlw PR-POND 3 330X_(Infi bon System# l\ 11 PR-CB O+ORT CS Sta 0+0 Rt w 1 1Z n tt'1.3a� 132,.. •� 't.. � 59... •�— ^15175 Detention ad 3 DMH Lot line 2021 CB Ste 2+93.99 PR-CB Road 8 R41'\= 13h d L \ Cl \11^e 14.8. 3 1.495 l / 3�S P4a+:. 136.sd , 4� EX-2ry pawl= 14to ,t 2. IlaS11K1barldnO11 01C 1¢ PxREs1 ,� " ND Suet40Aff.&1QG jOK. PRfOND\ Rune towards Clark /EX-3R \\\\777JJJ. Avenue Drairiage / System 2 PRCB 1+85 RT CB Ste 1*65 RT �a 11" otc. � i re Detention Pond,1 Runoff tow. existing Add Nmjuded tarml' EX-4R �2 (01 0 L 135. 3 wetlands the sad slated 'e Series n `w DMH Ste 1+72 DMH� LE�2nnage - .kk PR-CB 1+65 LT CB Sul 1+65 LT R1 M1 C I O'1.00 PC*.r-_ las 3e � Baas ltlrN: 14-1.0b 1210+- Mau NO r+1+tc1+Ad.6tf� Cv_ Nosed Wecanal FX-5(No Change) FbI►K C 135:39 Isolated Series c Nb S.+rt j tso S1w.e a+�o-l.s Rlnl a 13(••Va' r se�ea ToW Surface Runoff project adrscharereanaS 19 11 EX RES DM Ste 9.72.5 CB Sta 9+50 LT PR-CB 9.50LT EX-1R Ru towards ex¢a / ,$ e,._6_1•3�t-�� ' II � 1 ' sto the naM 2,� ,. era�'�I►IIfAli• OIL {�v sY (�j 'OIL \•V O� /R-POND d J CB Sta 9+50 RT PRCB 9+50RT Ile ' 1 1• ,fa ,� L$ 1 11 k = 'LO b =� le PR-CB 3+50LT CB Sta 3+50 LT PR-POND 2 , Detention Pond 2 Detention Pond 0 DMH DMH DMH 10+66 CB Ste 10+66 0+84 NC q.*AAW*4*' Pfotx.: t3i.zo i �l�.t.ob Rlw►z lu.f tGM.1+44 2 15`1 15\` �y Rtwtc 14440 Pa►r.. 12;.8t. P"tc.a 141.Z8 DMH Ste 3+25 DMH Sta 2+40 W LT DMH in Drainage NOS L.1'�FM61ai;OK NO UAf.V"�", e t` P( 141..7-1 w1�N.�1:.IN.04, f.1ft.140.1L E p.11Ma 13'1.6 go 54L"*& cs�olc. PR-CB 3+60RT CB Ste 3+50 RT PaW c 144.461 wM:e4s•o0 1Jos.se/w�o.a• Y ft4w--- 1Jo SJLtM .b PIL= 141.43 alp• o1L No SvRsi+wR tfs� 01L plog,,,c1w.¢ Routing Diagram for proposed-SUBMITTAL_R(Tc=6 min) Prepared b Microsoft Printed 2/1/2016'b t Rearych o L��k� P Y ' "` HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 06611 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC OFMA$s9 PROPOSED CONDITION N 0 PETER M. tiN BLAISELL,JR. o CIVIVIL WATERSHED & SOILS MAP y No.41613 HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: o M \ ASSUMED TO BE "D" AT EDGE OF B.V.W. IN O Z \ / �•� ga ' / ,/ C11�s��s) SALEM , MA "THE WOODLANDS" 0' 30' 60' 120' SCALE: 1 " = 60' DATE: AUGUST 14, 2015 Revised: August 31 , 1 LIMIT OF WATERSHED Revised: November 10, 201 5 �j ANALYSIS=20.Of ACRES (Testpits) . 'N \ yt0 4J ' \\ EX- 1R OND �_go3.o ® 0F> ,° 1 ' i �\ �( 190,053 S.F. ,462 �.aM1y PR_ - 3 WILLIAMS 1. & SPARAGES ^t � ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS X—RES2r A 3qs \ _�- - - 189 NORTH MAIN STREET 13,925 S.F. , 9 2S /—___ ' c. , ® - _ SUITE 101 // \\` 949 � PHONE: (978) 539-8088 _ ` iR.tnOr� 9ggN s =120* ¢Ev uTi tf� 0 �.5 y� ♦J°. $ ., tea« \ ,�. °� I � ,� o L = _ FAX: (978) 539-8200 y to•'"e - �,� s �� fes!__ _ - ___ _ J WWW.WSENGINEERS.COM PR— _ rs=�a o 1) ALL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES HAVE BEEN SCALED �`� ' �''?s �•, ss8 \ FROM THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE PLANS BY 21 ,635 S.F. ® ®\ ,` EASTERN LAND SURVEY. 43, 123 S. . • TSI 1 � � '� � / ��\ \ \ BEEN VEGETATED Gf_732.0 >F�131.0 \ \ _ , So' cE_so.D m.�o Tcf� �� 2) THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING BORDERING VE PR—CB O+OLT w.„”"MPE^"° "�<�\ \ \® s c� 90 WETLANDS & ISOLATED WETLANDS HAVE 8,849 S.F. ��P �° gR0.1ER o \'\ � \\ y , a 9 DELINEATED BY WILLIAMS & SPARAGES. ,i w� EX-2rTc v D * 13,478 S.F. _ \ $ RR B PR—CB O+ORT �G 8 _ ,29 PR—G'® 10+84 ' 4,997 S.F. ` Tc.. ' / n �, � \\ l / y 1593 S.F. Tc // / F` EX—RES1 r .3 \ �-A 94,840 S.F. 3 " PR—CB RO B 1! MAP UNIT SYMBOL: 102E ��p • • I 31 ,453 S. a \ MAP UNIT NAME: CHATFIELD-HOLLIS-ROCK , OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES Er, ROOF AR ! I tI NAT" ro HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B & C/D DIRECTLY w 6 =xmNc c USE "C" IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INFILTRATED TC ` PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS -1 125 S.F. Tc 25, L \ ' — : Tc � � � _ —®— — � � EX-4R (ISOLATED) EX-3r 70,668 S.F. 195,386 S.F., ® Rp EX-5 (ISOLATED) ® 4.9,862 S.F. ® (No Change) `'b T a n V 3 , a �N O E LEGEND \ \ ` MAP MT SYMBOL: 102E o WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINE — MAP UNIT NAME: CHATFIELD-HOLLIS-ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES TC \ HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B & C/D 3 HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: ` USE "C" IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE o TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED TO BE "D" AT EDGE OF B.V.W. , PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS o SOIL BOUNDARY LINE ` a `o FLOW DIRECTION ` J N O O W N \ HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: OF Al EXISTING CONDITION ASSUMED TO BE "D•' AT EDGE OF B.V.W. �,FA e� o`er PETER M. WATERSHED & SOILS MAP \( CIVIL ti Na.41613 IN tL \ \ \ / l \�� op Am_,o_1 EX—RE52 SALEM , MA 12,2 6 S.F. _ "THE WOODLANDS" Tc=5.0 min \\` — — — ;' _ — \\\ \\\ \ \ \ I 41 _38 0' 30' 60' 120' SCALE: 1" = 60 DATE: August 14, 2015 \ , iii r - '*' �= — \\ \ \\\\ \\� \ \ �► ; LIMIT OF WATERSHED ANALYSIS=20.0± ACRES Now Tc rym. . WILLIAMS 14% C�, SPARAGES I — �\ \ \ \\ -- __ _—. »�- ENGINEERS i PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 'EX 2 \\\ _ �� \ ' \ \\\ l / \ 127,758 S.F. \ �� \ \�\\\� \ — - — — -- _- — — `- -_- - s / ` / �� \ � \\\ / ( I\ \ \\ 1 CN=70 r \\ \ \ \`\\ �\\\\\\\ — — „a . _� ' r / / SUTE189 O1O1HMAINSTREET \ Tc=156 min \\ 1 \,\ \\\\ EX-1 — _ ' MIDDLETON, MA 01949 ` , <�� \ \ \ \Lys \tx y� — \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ $ f \ \t \\ \\\\ 18 326 S.F i — *az_ �/ \ \ _ S PHONE: (978) 539-8088 G ' y ` \ � , /. FAX: (978) 539-8200 CN=70 / r — — _ � ' www.wsengineers.com min, / ;,"` _ ` - -- \�` �` �\ \�\\\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \ `- — —` _ `\\\ \ Ih,�\�\\ \\\\� \ �� '-- J �a2 � ✓ � �. /41 1) ALL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES HAVE BEEN SCALED FROM THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE PLANS BY 41*1 EASTERN LAND SURVEY 2) THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING BORDERING VEGETATED WETLANDS & ISOLATED WETLANDS HAVE BEEN 'All 4 TC DELINEATED BY WILLIAMS & SPARAGES. EXXX�RES 1 \ Tc "'4 \ 234 S.F. \ \ \ \ \ 9 _\ I 1 ` ��2 Tc=5.0 min \ �� /` \ \\ \ \\ MAP UNIT SYMBOL: 102E �P�p . _= ••�� \ I ( ••I / / �\ ' � '\ \\\ Y ' I I \' 2 , \ \ \ \ \ IIIIIIIII11, 111 11 MAP UNIT NAME: CHATFIELD—HOLLIS—ROCKWall11111 , OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPE` 16* HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B & C/D ` \ \ \\ yR / T //,� i \ Tc USE "C" IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ®PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS ® "w ro•m,-�mw, — In.+NA j \ l �Qz 221 —_' / '/ .ti -7 > . l g —+. — — CN 55 =— — , / \•' / 1 EX'-4 (ISOLATED) a 49,366 S.F. Tc=14.2 min ,44- 142 \ \ — !�i j / / . r'• IIII I I 4gIL 'S,,F. CIV ` \ � — --_ / / / / / j , �► TC 12.3,• ® ` � � \ ' \ � � \ \� // / � � i r / / ��/ / / // 11 � � \ / .SII �, I • `� \ \ \ \ \ mss\ \ / I � l i l l %/ ,; / / / I \\ ( 11► *41 12 ♦ ♦ � \ III �- \ \ �\ \ __ _ \ \ \ \ � � -- - n \\ ow *4111 \ ` MAP \ MAP UNIIT NAME: CHATFIELD—HOLLIS—ROCK LEGEND E _ — OUTCROP COMPLEX, 15 TO 35 PERCENT SLOPES N \ HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B & C/D WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINE HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: ® USE "C" IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ASSUMED TO BE "D" AT EDGE OF B.V.W. 1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS TC MAP UNIT SYMBOL: 102C TIME OF CONCENTRATION ' MAP UNIT NAME: CHATFIELD—HOLLIS—ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX, 3 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES ` HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B SOIL BOUNDARY LINE ` FLOW DIRECTION I J Q 1 LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN 1.SECTION IV A.1 .f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY DATE: __ PA �qyA (230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO SHOWN ON , PLANS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY P �& oG� 2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS W CRK srRf oaay�P+ LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY ON PLANS.. DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. 2 3.SECTION iV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 " CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) TREES PER LOT AND GENERALLY AS SHOWN ON PLAN. CITY CLERK NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. /V LOCUS LOCUS - - - cy�yti, .•�,/ ,,i i I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS .I OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. VICINITY MAP „ / ------------------- 1 =800 f JEANETTE H. WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC / TORION - ALFRED & JOAN / / - 07-0008 FRANCES LUCIANO JOSEPH & VVV LOUISE P. PAUL, PAULETTE, NOTES: - �,�'. - / - 07-0007 / 07 EO OS / JOHN & SCOTT GEORGE IA LORRAINE M. /GAIL L. FIALHO - LEBLANC /GAGNE TRUST/ IUR & ESMA _ LO 1. VERTICAL DATUM UNKNOWN (SEE NOTE 2) 07-0003 07-0004 07-0076 HYSENESHI / WILLIAM M. 07-0002 MONROE, JR. / - ESAM Y. - o7-ooas A 2, EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES ARE AS SHOWN ON THE 07-00DIR I 07-0001 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION BY THE CITY OF SALEM (MARCH 3, 2008 RICHARD L. O'DAY DECISION) ENTITLED 'DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS" 03-0137 LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY EASTERN LAND SURVEY. MONITORING WELL .So 3. WETLAND RESOURCE AREA BOUNDARIES WERE DELINEATED BY WILLIAMS & SPARAGES. 2 3 FIRE HYDRANT 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON / / 4 -OPEN SPACE 1 WATER GATE m� THESE PLANS, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN 1 WRITING OF ANY UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND JEFFREY M. CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. &Roc ELLEN Wpp 5 02-0046 p��o UTILITY POLE 5, TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT BE HEAT PATCHED: �y SRO �� qp 6. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE 8" DIAMETER CLASS 52 CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON 6 LIGHT POLE �F (C.L.D.I. ) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. v� 13 ��G� 14 - DRAIN MANHOLE OD 7. ALL GRAVITY SEWER LINES SHALL BE 8" DIAMETER SDR 35 PVC PIPE. 7 SEWER MANHOLE 0 12 15 8. WATER AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED 16 8 g 10 1 1 CONC CONCRETE WHERE WATER AND SEWER LINES CROSS. - SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE 9. ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL BE HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) UNLESS aRAN zona 1 7 FND =- FOUND OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. REALTY TRUST WCR - WHEEL CHAIR RAMIP 4'p� 06-0019 / 1 8 N/F = NOV! OR FORMERLY 10. MINIMUM PITCH FOR ALL DRAIN LINES SHALL BE 0.5% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON y s TROD = IRON ROD THE PLAN. r 11 . ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE T.V. SERVICES SHALL .BE INSTALLED F TADEUSz 19 UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY AGENCY HAVING �f� eARcaowsKl 24 CONSERVATION TREE ' JURISDICTION. 06-0017 Sp , 25 COMMISSION Zs� R/6 Zky 06-0011 EXISTING CONTOUR --104— — . STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT TWO (2) PER LOT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON GZ C/RCcF': 26 ------[10`41----- 12 <F PROPOSED CONTOUR ,______, PLAN, SEE REQUESTED WAIVER. , - \ 20 23 PONS- EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - -EP- - - - - 13. FIRE ALARM BOX INSTALLATION AND LOCATION(S) SHALL BIE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE \ REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT. / 22 �EZ0N1E�uNE I VERTICAL GRANITE CURB VGC 14. TRANSITIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS INTO DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE MADE USING 21 PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES —�—�— RADIUS GRANITE CURBS. I 15. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION TO BE SHOWN AT A LATER `DATE) SHALL BE IN PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ( Ei I ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, OR, OTHER \ SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION APPROVING AUTHORITY. SURYA & 16. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS ISABELLE WIRWO (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD AS SHOWN ON 06-0015 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 25009CO531G; MAP REVISED JULY 16, 2014. 17. PROPOSED FOUNDATION UNDERDRAINS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE TOWARDS THE STREET. SEAL OPEN SPACE 2 27 ZN Of MgSy�cyo o PETER M. N BLAISDELL,JR. CIVIL w A No.416130 Q CITY OF SALEM JAMES E. .. - CONNICK - - PLANNING BOARD 06-0005 5 Legend of Symbols &Abbreviations 1 /29/2016 m 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 a 3 No changes to this sheet 12/07/2015. -------------------- --- 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 1 Lot line 18/19; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015 LYNN SAND & NO. REVISION DATE ------------------------ STONE 12 n C/0 AGGREGATE 1 �I PLAN I /� 1 Y D�X/� 1 L/"'�N NINDUSTRIES D6-DG,2 ----------------------- "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION ------------------------ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS N OWNER: BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL ------------------------ - - - 18 WALLACE ROAD LYNN, MA 01901 - LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 WILLIAMS ------------------------ APPLICANT: PLAN S ET INDEX SPARAGES a NSD REALTY TRUST ________________________ 76 OAKVILLE STREET . ENGINEERS i MANNERS i SURVEYOR SHEET 1 : INDEX PLAN LYNN, MA 01905 PLAN REFERENCES: PROJECT LOCUS: 189E 101 MAw STREET SUITE 101 SHEET 2 - 3 : DEFINITIVE PLANS, ----------------------- CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA i 1) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-B ASSESSORS REFERENCE: MIONE: (97 , M301949 PHONE: (978) 539-8088 SHEET 4— 5 : DEFINITIVE PLAN �c PROFILES _-____- 2) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-X MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 -7 /� ----------------- 3) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-2 0' 40' 80' 160' a SHEET 6 - / : TOPOGRAPHIC PLANS 4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED "DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM, INDEX SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE: --- MASSACHUSETTS" DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY SHEET `B - 11 Q — 1 1 : DETAIL ' SHEETS EASTERN LAND SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY SALEM PLANNING BOARD). SCALE: 1°=80' SHEET 1 OF 11 AUGUST 14, 2015 w a JEANETTE H. TORION GEORGE M. & / ALFRED & JOAN / JOSEPH & GAIL L. FIALHO \U 07-0008 FRANCES LUCIAN0 / 07-0003 \\77 / LOUISE P. SLEISON PAUL, PAULETTE, JOHN / LORRAI IE \ 07-0005 / & SCOTT LEBLANC / GAGNE TRUST ILIR & ESMA HYSENESHI rn / \ : 07-0004 /07-0076 � 07-0002 / WILLIAM' M. MONROE, JR. I '� \ 07-0086 ESAM Y. ABDELGADIR I w / ohs \ s / 07-0001 S85'29'10"E / RICHARD L. O'DAY Q. 951.48 / I 03-0137 h^� ��\ Ss, I _j / \ / \ ,14.09 S76 07'0 ' DRAIN - �\ N79'2451„E f EASEMENT ,03.78 107.52 . / \ 10.31 OPEN SPACE 1 / \ 5's AREA= 168,388 S.F. CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED LOT 2 M , io 6 / \ O. s 1 0 �5��o A \ p• my LOT 3 8 �s _ (44, 100± S.F. WETLANDS WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS _ 1/ w Q 7,697 S.F. o Nk as.42 s vJ °�\ ��o` z 7,412 S.F. 'o OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN N86'40_01"E 3 L\\ G0� \\ 3 /M� CRI S \ a o PREPARING THIS PLAN. \ Od \ 0 \ X275.5 p0 4=22'07'48:, LOT 4 60gg?\ LOT 1 ^ \ ! �\ R=t�_65.65 Rx�6S.3 7.492 S.F. ,� F 7,LO S.F. VA \\o .0 5.05 5�� 00 >> /0 9>so � ------------------- o• _1650 a5 /a o _ _ _ N WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC ' 66. 6• J 6 6 p0 '34" - - ;, S3 .932>, r oti'1�60. 9� 4S81,1 3R F N86'40'o1,E � °y1 4034" S65 <9,?. 6 I 50.24 p-74 y00 In/ /S s3„ 1S LOT 5 " \ R 16292 •VQ �: p 7,421 S.F. SA6•, 279.74 31.71 _ s �'`� / o p0°i N86'40'01"E 33 /�� 07 5t Rx 2-° QO ' °'00 art, 7R� D"� /Ory^ _ . JEFFREY M. & ti s ,� o x 0p - Z 9 1'1�N�0, 5" 20'48'39" .:4o S66. ELLEN T. ROGATO \\ UTILITY : V 2y:y15 >S 'S's OS R.34 4625.. �S� �h•o.P -T7 02-0046 - EASEMENT „ R�y5 F /5)0 9p - ��\ y°p° J``Pv:SiP\� - �O°jO°•`1.1 r> - 'pw, 70QOp /q °0 - DRAIN \ - /.� ROADWAY p0 ^F, 1 �`fl' \ _ _ ° - �:�q'�D'1�� 1 ( \ in 59.?,$ - O - LOT 6 / . EASEMENT \ S� EASEMENT � °�10°jam �F \ ti°o 1z: op ��oo ,o\\ S LOT 13 ,N �\' 7,203 S.F. Ss ,fl\ern. 0 o, s 9,147 S.F. o P. s 61 ' �, 16oti \ �p \ oss z LOT 14 R a,2 3so°�6 a,.� Se so? 604 - s\°�; 1,2,433 S.F. a :2 s oos 2bg:oo T,°moo i6, a\. /^o^y 6 '6'04. F X03 CITY OF SALEM , o Ss G5 >9 ss?\\ 7o 839„ - �\6 a R\3,3g 2 90 O O>„ 'Po2�29 �k•7 Vol �� F �s - -\\ .PLANNING BOARD . G 26 ,p°� oSE�6\��O F \S2 N 4 �S 6> \2? SOS S �O�O2Q'• AQP S6642.g6 _ �\ E 7 \ ------------------------ P � --90.00,00", d56� 1��9 LOT 12 F \�dJ \\ h ° LOT 1rJ \ 320 0432 0Oo ��°4'F S85'38'41"E 191.54 N753g42 \ R=3o00 pp° s \ 11,127 S.F. 7 \ m /`� 12,973 S.F. s LOT 7 15.46 x7.53 Gi L=47 12 ° c?6�\ b0 h \ ^ 7,296 S.F. S85'38'41"E SI85'38'47"E 78.55 0 ------------------------ Jv -_ /v^ry /�2 vN e o N S85'38'41"E ° N83'3800'E h w -+ : - y 5• - O, rya ,,.�• N o Co X56 0 DRAIN 13 45 S64� 2 /Q F m S6 S8 "6�S °9 d \ rn a w ml F � '-'� 0 ------------------------ \o, 42 53 / o `= gos?1 \ _ R°o R,^?s• a LOT 8 o LOT 9 o LOT 11 \� EASEMENT - \SOF / ? ,MI�e��14 �30,. \ 3� �.7?30 06• o• o N ^ p z RIM, F �, 0 0 3s'• 6,370 S.F. D'P 6,798 S.F. n n�Q ,W 7 994 S.F. - m z . LOT 16 p 08 0 / o 3 Q LI 64• ;� �! o o LOT 10 - ` \ a\ ° N83'38'00'E 78.24 gE�30 �ryh .h � � r 10,245 S.F. 4 o3�j P 20 ^ o m roe o� ova cn s 6,782 S.F. � °>Q no - . ,o ^,oo > F =ryh n DRAIN S >?. 'O 1 \>,�° \2>3 0 _ 17:, _7 5 - - ------ S EASEMENT 64'OS�2 S�'� o �96 'Og7" Cx - =22'13' °'� •vNi o n rn 6g� 3p.. 2 3., >g 200 R-230 58'02" 2 n o u ry0 00 3053 rn F T7 MO' Rx23 Op L=89 00 L=75.24 9 �L 9793 515 }ho woo ------------ o ?o 1.3g o F ^ LOT 17 R. dx4g, o.op 20 R=270.00 d x .?7 _ I a N 0 0 0 v Q \.59>00 4921.. L_ Ra44 5514,• d ,1.12 R=50.00 zM ° oo rn v�M S6g, S6 n DRAIN 8 233 S.F. F 7 > O 110.00 27 4 `2 5" R_ 85 32 1. 50.0 p5. 4 p.. EASEMENT rn �qry 2y 3 -�� - R_27 9 O Op R?'36'1 t,4 30 O0 R_g5.9 II p u ------------------------ . �/ r'r p : - �3p F 6230„ N - /ph „ 029„ <13 m. - - d=25'25' Lx 3p 00 d=109' 0 Q�� 9q / 19So0° F a0 °) d v 16 3Q 52 5422" w �' O� O N 0�y d=11'43'12:. d=25• 1.x3 6 �\ p 584'21'59"f o s � 0 25'16" S.3 5 n / y 0 R-270.00 R_ Rx 8 26 ------------------------ O 75 - - 230 p0 d, 23p 0 00 v 82 S84'21'S9"E p'Ro��65�' L=55.23 1._10 . 4 0 µ,2S 06 8.91 y S6g• 56.40 S84'21'S9"E <"\\ L-1 2OS 8 8'47,. 60y5 45"E o 01. - N85'09'� z .� o AQ 230.Op R� 17,2.; 0 �Gs IRAN 2014 / Sg8 0 hII ro S84'21'S9"E 74.21 LOT 18 � 'P " R= 80 dx1j. D' rn F 9 F '� l,;v _•� 206.43 d !� _ '27 •, 4. v REALTY TRUST 22 06-0019 TADEUSZ & o�� 11 ,644 S.F. R °30020°ae"020°0 2521'39^ nNaoo 1x5320° J BAJOANN SKI / 2 pL14 A30.33 60 0 0 ° u9 Ro2�O�g \?06003„ ---- G � / LOT 19 1 06-0017 R.50 00 J oo - p R\0 12 - ------ No n/ 10,498 S.F. co w 1 h.h0 n 4`230 0 a•r o•/ N p•o190 o=12635'33' SALEM - / co.h h - m ii `p v 48,. - 50.00 10 h� / of ii ry LOT 24 e R= CONSERVATION DATE: ----- /- w ,. L-112.22 -------------- 12,636 S.F. �, o RxSo ons COMMISSION S84 21 53"E ii .5 J d �,74 g9 an m 06-001 1 Q �° a , LOT 25 as ss 1 N q ZI 99.76 / ii u� 'o N D 37" It - - �O V ' 25.23 / a 74.53 �/ R:31.e °. opo Z 7,904 S.F. z ° o ��94. PLAN REFERENCES: I f i h Q a, ? s o 5. 6 yo 0 , c G >232'°o vd"', c1- -<D 6, 0 SS". z 1) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-B GAF v ee�� / N l ` � �C/ 3 %esti$ X700 0> j!� y LOT 26 W 2 LAND COURT PLAN 7159-X \ o�� v !�\ Q� ��so, � \� ,AZ to o �,ti X0,26 F ti�o0 S82.49'10 437 o D ,250 p 9<J ;9 6 3) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-2 �� / N� o;so A 'o µ' AO n 4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED ".DEFINITIVE ho p try LOT 20 srn� wp � 1s. R,t521 LOT 23 81.05 o SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM, rn�h / 14,709 S.F. `�.- 0,2646°4 8,251 S.F. ° S6Sg\ z r MASSACHUSETTS" DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED tih/ �/ a �„ol, L>46.69 s� �bgry 95 35'F THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY EASTERN LAND / 2 / Q ,tea/'r ^ �'/ 50.00 R=145.00 u 31 OCATION R SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY / o�, i� °/ R=55.35 L=10.,69 o ss. 1�, �r SCALED L SNE--- SALEM PLANNING BOARD). 30 / , / p=63'25'53" �=4'1321' a LOT 22 °9°� r ° ,ti�� ZONE L / 00 P n° 0 7,630 S.F. F �,5 4 os. � LOT 21 o ! � N ry 1?23�°'e ra %,h, 9,404 S.F. P N S p o _o }w �ryry. 6g'053� D N O - DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND O WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. �4 1gS 1 ?� o _ - N83-46'53"E 107.14 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN h/o g ��6 30 u l N83'a6'S3"E 119.97 205.37 Z N83'46'53"E 227.11 DATE: ------------------ 2ryh N 21.74 ry \ 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016 CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO �\ 4 No changes to this sheet 1/22/2016 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS P-AN BY DRAIN N.1\ 3 No changes to this sheet 12/07/2015 THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS / EASEMENT \ 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY ^ \ 1 Lot line 18/19; Notes 9/4/2015 e DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. SURYA & ^ r4 �\ NO. REVISION DATE ISABELLE WIRYO ry o - i 06-0015 - orya ry j N \\ DEFINITIVE PLAN --------------------------- CITY CLERK N "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 3 ?3 F �3Z OPEN SPACE 2 w n Y x \14163 OWNER: , S.F. LOT 27 BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL (47,500± S.F. WETLANDS) 147,992 S.F. E : 18 WALLACE ROAD o z LYNN, MA 01901 o LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 APPLICANT: WILLIAMS Y RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED I Y o ZONE: ONE-FAMILY : INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY NSD REALTY TRUST SPARAGES o (R1) (I) (R1) CLUSTER 1.SECTION IV A.1 .f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENGINEERS t PLANNERS I SURVEYORS (230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS LYNN, MA 01905 a MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) SHOWN ON PLANS. PROJECT LOCUS: 189 NORTH MAIN STREET SUITE 101 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: SEAL OF AJq CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDDLETON, MA 01949 MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. NONE 2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN TOTAL PARCEL AREA=750,538 S.F. q� PHONE: (978) 539-8088 (NONE) LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 150,108 S.F. (20% OF TOTAL) os �� ASSESSORS REFERENCE: LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% PETER M m MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 a MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT ON PLANS. (MIN. OPEN SPACE UPLAND REQUIRED = 75,054, WHICH IS 50% OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED) y OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 303,458 S.F. o BUNO.601, JR NO.601 ti o' 20' 40' 80' DEFINITIVE SHEET 1 OF 2 MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT " 3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 )" (OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROVIDED = 211 ,858± S.F.) MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. ( SCALE: 1" 40' . MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT = SHEET 2 OF 11 NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. AUGUST 14, 2015 R=30 5000 r oo \ 11,127 11,12 7 'SE.F. Iary 12,973 S.F. 7,296 � $..F. v0O S851381's4.1"E - 58538'4 1" 0 885451"E5857 38'00 12 8 0012 N63 10. �5G 0 DRAIN F �`4� 5640 _ /457 _� S64 S8j _� �. 4 sA5oo9 °'• EASEMENT �X25 3p.. / O /2�2 OS 31 � \ 3:00 CRo22S p 2 LOT 8 0 o f LOT 9 0 J w � z \ F , s F .M/ee�I \ p �s„ ., ap 6• N LOT 1 1 Z \ 6 370 S.F. n o a 6 798 S.F. n n ° S64�. o o LOT 16 ! Q. a, 080 �^ do L 7.994 S.F. o �w OT 10 f 4 S ^h w o 10 245 S.F. 4 °�?� R 20• 09 6 782 S.F. l rn >,00 o No N83'38'00'E 76.2 46 3p•. _ � . y �\ v _ ZO S EASEMENT DRAIN 5640542 N �� h Si0�00 (0 6,�04�" d =2 z Lr) a x 64� 3 2 o �J, j O C 2 R- 2.13'17" A=15'58'02.. _ m O A R, 0o p -230 00 L=75.24 ` A=91'30'15" ^� o o0 71.38 p F ?� �� LOT 17 GR\2 j d 4g 0•OO L=89.20 R=270.00 4;9?>'1 L=79.85 �o o too N . 564• S6 . 4 1S.J 0 _ 9 -179.7 ,22 4" . d c R-1.12.32,,. R=50.00 zM roto ^'> n DRAIN 8,233 S.F. =F, 0 9 0 1 L- R, 5S _ _ - OS3 4 p� EASEMENT Mo h^ 2403 v j R=270 pp 0.00 Rc236'1g„ C-q 85 00 R-50.9 1 l U " J / - 30 �j rA �OF 6?OpOF ^ /p� y 28.. <� rn. 4=25'25'1 Cc3pOp 6- - 00 d�� \� �5 6" 3052 -109'54'22" w o> v 9AP 19500 S84'21'59"E _� O °� •o°N� 1g y0 6=11'43'12" 4=25'25'16" G,35. 56 r O 75.82 S114'21'S9^E �. OSS Lg�6' R 990.00 R_230.00 4R'23o•3p L 2 Op " f / . y0 564pS� w '. 56.40 S874.219„E. ��'y0 !� G 10102.05 64g•4j^ R6o5506 6.91 z s 8 0 v q �o F' R=230,8p d,1j•17'24,, > 5 N65'09'45"E rn c TRAN 2014 64 3 �= s84 21'Ss"E LOT 18 /., a 206.43 L=0.12 >O2S$8 d =25'21 R,2>0. 24 _ �` - REALTY TRUST 2 2 06-0019 / TADEUSZ & oe�� Nh 11,644 S.F. R=23o.oa �Fno 3s" a�$oo " C,S3. 00 R4�'� , YYOODLANDS Z / JOANNA Q / p BARCIKOWSKI z ��130337^ a A=oohs' °:R �' ti5oee 20 �.�so1 ROAD G / / LOT 19 0 s, Roti a. G, X603 I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED 06-0017 ` R.So.o �I oo R,012 WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS rya�o / 10,498 S.F. o + p yon pl: d 2,70 p . 33" o OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN Ovc;, moo' m o - o - rn - 0 48• -. M SALEM -- . / / / ' o p' 1 0 6 R=5000 ^ CONSERVATION PREPARING THIS PLAN. h/ / e ti LOT 24 O . w �° „2.22 y0 0 w R> L= o to = 1 5'.ti v 12,636 S.F. �� w o J C_70.00 co _ 1COMMISSION S 1 i0.0� h d,854.g9 LO^� 384'; 1'S3"E Q 10 } oe ------ 9q 2 99.76 (� O� a LOT 25 I p N o ss 37,. „n °¢ ^/ 25.23 / 74.53 , r/O �/y R 71 O n�h� z v 7,904 S.F. o ^ ° WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC V n d\) 2s.6s /-j9 Ryo66 0 S � Z o u y _ O /�° - C L.7� ?3 pp - GSF / N Paces �C/ 6; 3• �o6yye ��oo °� fy� LOT 26 / ° '�oo�. : \F 0;42 5p0 Dotio9�s f 51yy`o ss24s o,.E ;7,853 S.F. }N 1 1 �O° po s?' R 18 a0 00_652 81.05po ^v)�o z LOT 20 am° R ,45 , LOT 23zo 14,709 S.F. a, 0 ; .2546'04" 8,251 S.F. o S6S4� z oa/ii q L R=145.00 rs 16 9531 R1 - 2�M/ ti „ / R=5&00 L-10 6s s <1 LOCATION----- / o�V )� / L=55 63525553" A=4'13'21" o°o >� /h0 �y1�' SCALED LINE / 3 / LOT 22 �: e` ,ti ZONE apo / 6 ah D0, al 7,630 S.F. 5 4 " 2s LOT 21 0" -____ ON N ti 31 Fo�� o� 9,404 S.F. N w ryti S64.0S9 .30,2C -_ 107.14W 0s3'4653E -� �NA - 11 .97 0 8N63'46'53"E 205.37 'nn \ 227.11 Al N83'46'S3'E / '" 2� � 21.74 \ yry i DRAIN EASEMENT SURYA & \ ISABELLE WIRYO ryw N / 06-0015 tiotih J\\ CITY OF SALEM I =ryh PLANNING BOARD N - N ------------------------ OPEN SPACE 2 ,� X82 E_ 74 ��'I•yi i � AREA= 135,070 S.F. LOT 27 M 47 500± S.F. WETLANDS a CO� 147,992 S.F. 00 N o z N ------------------------ ^ N In i m � a ------------------------ - 564 S : - M M - ------------------------ 92p,e w IiI ------------------------ Z DATE: ------------------- JAMES E. CONNICK 06-0005 Sl - DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL -ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY ( , (R1) (Q (R1) CLUSTER / s80 25.46 523 S80'261 03"E 3a 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016 17 7'30 4 No changes to this sheet 1/22/2016 07 - MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) / - MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) 3 No changes to this sheet 72/07/2015 MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. (NONE) 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 45% 30% LYNN SAND & STONE 1 Lot line 18/19; Notes 9/4/2015 1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT C/0 AGGREG 06-0TE 012 INDUSTRIES NO. REVISION DATE ' MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT DEFINITIVE PLAN 3 MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT I "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION r SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: OWNER: TOTAL PARCEL AREA=750,538 S.F. BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 150,108 S.F. (20% OF TOiTAL) 18 WALLACE ROAD ' CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED (MIN. OPEN SPACE UPLAND REQUIRED = 75,054, WHICH IS 50% OF OPEN . SPACE REQUIRED) LYNN, MA 01901 OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 303,458 S.F. LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 WILLIAMS DATE: ----------------- (OPEN SPACE UPLAND PROVIDED 211 ,858± S.F.) APPLICANT: 1 .SECTION IV A.1 .f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY _ 11"" YY Q ,� � A 1 (230) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW 1"HE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS NSD REALTY TRUST (� SPARAGES SHOWN ON PLANS. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO 76 OAKVILLE STREET HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY LYNN, MA 01905 2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN 189 NORTH MAIN STREET THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS PROJECT LOCUS: i LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN PLAN REFERENCES: SEAL SUITE 101 OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY ON PLANS. tH°fM4sS� CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA i MIDDLETON, MA 01949 DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING CF SAID NOTICE. zs cyc ASSESSORS REFERENCE: PHONE: (978) 539-8088 1) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-B o 2) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-X IS PETER M MAP 6 PARELS 7 8 & 9 PAX: (978) 539-8200 3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 0 61A1g0ELL, JR. I - CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. 3) LAND COURT PLAN 7159-2 U N6.501% " 0' 20' 40' 80' ----------------------------- DEFINITIVE SHEET 2 OF 2 CITY CLERK 4) AN UNRECORDED PLAN ENTITLED "DEFINITIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN, CHAPEL HILL, SALEM, oFess�oaP NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. MASSACHUSETTS" DATED JUNE 28, 2006 REVISED THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2007 BY , EASTERN LAND SURVEY (SEE MARCH 3, 2008 DECISION BY SALEM PLANNING BOARD). SCALE: 1 =40 SHEET 3 OF 11 q IG AUGUST 14, 2015 SEE PROFILE SHEET 2 o o T8�•. ora PROPOSED DMH \ u o\ GF= Il 14 0 144.611 - - IJ'j! RIM-140.8 41g 7.0 0 II 15- INV-135.88 \\ ��\ 550' O so. 's o TF`s0 4 4 4a . I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED C ONS PROPOSED SMH Q CF, ,5 TEN SPACE 1 DEEDS IN WITH THE RULES AND RE / RIM=T.B.D. \ J;� '�-' O h yp tih0 °' 2 a es oo M � 2 , OF REGISTERS OF INV=131.66 s� y" �°�y' o \ \ GF _14S_1Tn S PREPARING THIS PLAN. F' s0 /I '? �' 'SOX p/1h \ 2' HDPE DRAIN S=4.8 I S $Q' '0 ^7o I o PROP. CONTROL - SMH WC \ GF 0 + p 7p IgE 7q STRUCTURE S - gyp, S V I > > , , S ss RIM-122.83 / ------------------- nv.et31.44 pvC '_ _\ h S g9 - 18" LEVEL O 118.00 - / PROPOSED FES ' _ __ _ _ - WILLIAMS. .& SPARAGES LLC - S 8 ER I PROPOSED SMH °`♦ ER W V MO rF`s0' ISI 6" ORIFICE O 118.00 / 12" INV=114.00 _ _ - 5 0a% .50 RIM=138.33 _ _ _ - e,Oo61, 3x6'I>rfA' 3 sPo, J• G'C`-I -d ?S s _ 82'OHDPEEINV.=1104.50 // - INV=133.33 - -- e 5 W O NOTE: ALL TRAP ROCK g" PVC SEWER S a+s3.n ,s so,7s?p o x 5=0.57m / PROPOSED 18" ASIN _ S oo yti 3+63 17 ' 8 °gyp ''�° O (SET INV.1LEVEL) 218.0 N DIAMETER STONE _ QG .t,* lylyp0 , , sF1yFR 5 D _ 122.5 / °o ♦m 411 ' o sa0s59 § // 7 4-2 E a t h INFI 21.5 -• .. _..---t 22.5` PROPOSED FES �i TOP OF FOREBAY=122.0 DMH RIM-126.5 � \ r'` ♦*P e p35 o 14 ,5 s0 / // *? O ESHGWT BS 0 TION BASIN 4 ♦ 18" INV-122.00 PROPOSED SHALLOW \ 1+30.00 HYDT & 5/ y. O �F� 9 S 1pp " DOWN TO no'± (HS'droCAD Pond TP 4-1 ELEV=120'1 \ / _ OG 'I5 C \J4 '1 66'7S.p@ 7 /� �O T,n S j / 1 ToJP OF BERM 144P) - 4'L SPILLWAY O 121.5 18" INV-122.5 Y� NO ESMGMT OBSERVED BOTTOM=720.0 \ - 7P OSI ELEV 137'3 '4 v 1 '(X "1I 00 GF`7q $ 'WSJ E- CT p O• Sa 1 BOTTD =122.$ REFUSAL♦ENCOUNTERED \ I 8'L 117,0 49 T13'i_ 722. ESHCWT BELOW 1321 GFX,�" T ?o w g 4 *op C orrSs CJ �? EMERG NCYF BERM= `- 9cTtPr Qor,EO G� \ pec l moo. G SPILLWAY O 122.0 � ' - Q O QP . . ♦*3O +�+ \ h9' � w 9so S0. `�O � � o o 5 - \// (/ � OQ` - �y630000 ♦zo° �? 0`50�� \ ,s,y\\ 13 - go> - GF 7745 G, I '•0 3 ,s, � 18. oPE - \ S O '0p 7 o O O O o O O o 0 0 0 O \\ \ PROPOSED DMH /ggs S0, O.S Is c p \ �\ soyel h0 N♦• 5 \ \ RIM-137.0 O o qui\ SFy O TS_14T 0+30.00 X%N.` \ 18" INV=132.54 ow rsoos F sa , s.s o TF SO, Igs R=30 < \ Xp ,1'S 1:q7.IP y1Ptf'� P .1 EED. GOX 50 / o \ 14 - CFF�r7S3 Ses* sy`O_ C`�7 SSS - O 135.D q1° �p O, r - PROPOSED CB LT e 1 tl o h \ o / pA\\ 15 gs SO:s7 '0 w s*r °9 a SO S30 0 42. STATION=0+00 ? eepe. r°o<o r . 1327 ,hh 12 / 36 _ le,Op Sep O O s o ? s� M 50 5 _ RIM=129.00 O 0 s o LJ - _ �p ,�� , i 1� i \ / ♦ )Nj0 A/l�j 4 TF- _ 140.5 1 O 137.5 p . . ?, s CF. TF=151.0 5� r m 12" INV=125.25 0o p z" , "mm 1' i i S3° \ / F p SFS�3 q� 6+05.72 + + ' S n 143.0 50' U - - L w, 130.9 132.5 ,J �� IJ2.5 Re9gYfA7 1 6 04. I✓`�F s Ra. ,s GF=152.0 ", CF=141.0 0 50' ,JgS - 7F� 133.0 O. J .5 - U ® € ryo°' 31.1 32.2 0 T r s <. J p GF=150.0 " o TF, CFS p J S o+00.00 N Mo `♦♦ \ \ sa o°po 50' T$ 141 ' ROPOSED SEDIMENT h RETAIN NG WALL a � �` ♦ C o S 50• CF, 0�0 GF' PROP. 8" TAPPING OIL SEPARATOR WITH IMPERVIOUS /JSS ` ^` ♦ ♦ \ - rxsS T lg R 751. 49.5 GFS l4.6 S O SQ 146.5 STATION 0+40 2YRT BARRIER TP 1-i E 1 5'± ♦ ♦ PROPOSED 18" Sp�S2,OS / l✓ B PVC 18 8+23.11 149. 14 .5 $D• 9.0 - ^7 41.5 SLEEVE & TRIPLE 6 o Es cw 36RVED ♦ INV =132.75 S S , Se L= 9+7249 {v t t s.7s GATES RIMS-1309 WN i 12S'3 ( ) O Sqa >/FR Sa RS270.00 4g, / 591 - - D PROPOSED DMH - - 12" INV M-124.68 PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMEM ♦ $ET LEVEL ° Ca ?> x O, 5 >9 00 RIM-139.0 - 12" INV OUT-124.43 AREA [HydroCAD POND 78P] , ♦1 9y. q°p W Po 66� S 8 x 9+ 4f1 RU 0 Q`v 18" INV-134.5 - - (SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION STRUCTURE) 65 3 T 8*8' 8 P C SEWER 5=0.65T S Ra 'W-3 PROP. DMH _� PROPOSED CB RT � (40) cuL1Ec 3soxL CHAMBERS �� 7 fE w/Tk,P 0 0 - STATION-0+00 < 9 TOP OF STONE=125.94 6. 1 7 6+95.29 CATES (E I (aJs O.Op 0 RIM-144.6± • 0 N85'09'45"E RIM=127.75 / .(," 4A TOP OF CHAMBERS-125.44 _ /, C < -/ TP :EV-12 161 el 3Q A a Y.4 8+00 8.+23.1 TPC J8 R �\ 2" INVS =141.50 IN 12" INV=125.25 /" �O . BOTTOM OF CNAMBER53122.90 NO ESHGWT OBSERVED FS` - 4Ny - - W W W W 9tp0 8 pVC E" 18" INV-141.00 OUT D WN TO 129'3 O - 1 BOTTOM OF STONE-122.40 $ n T ° ' -� EW (INSTALL INSPECTION PORTS AT/ T \�O �, o_ro 6 a WA W 9x3R Sao X59 17r D 312 HDPE 5=1.46% , F SALEM OG THE END OF EACH ROW) Y O- 1� to o H 9.y63po 7+7 .98 C R=270.00 L`702.G5 OgP PLANNCITY ING G BOARD S /C h L�55.' R- 10+00 J INFILTRATION BASIN 1 O r rn R x + 9ti 230.00 o+a6.5sP I �� ` / (HydroCAD Pond 142P) - ^h Cw .o c+18.1z p e 0 C, (L �' F $ I' TOP OF BERM=136.5 SEE PROFILE SHEET 2 1 $ 7+29.16y 18 48. W P oP• e" 34.1 4 0+89.03 BOTTOM OF BERM-132.0 30 0° 0+23.33 h o. '� 115 CED, WAr I' 8'L EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 0 136.0 PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE o o `� O 5 s o so.p R�27poo a ------------------------ I� r 10+83.75 EXIST. DMH / RIM=142.50 �e m ° 18580 ♦"� a1° 6"Cq `F RIM=124.16 XcP`� y TOP OF FOREBAY=133.0 4" ORIFICE 0 1132.75 .h y" 4X% \0.�y0 0 s+83.30 s RfoUC, W >F INV=119.3 g O �� / 41 SPILLWAY ® 132.5 8" ORIFICE O 1134.00 GXXo1 p TF,T51 4 PR 3 BOTTOM OF FOREBAY=131.0 10" ORIFICE 0 134.50 G g0 27 CF,1 •$ 8s q . 12" RCP INV.=1131.50 0. has OF,T49 0 Ra S 01 LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS I ° ti i� 53G 25 GF ,44z•0 N ------------------------ °G U MONITORING WELL FIRE HYDRANT ------------------------ .0 Y \ Z WATER GATE j/ // \ _ \ �. w 0 LU ------------------------ / \� � � WJ o CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) _ -/ : _ SAM (Pump-Assumed) - Rim-124.56lnv� NA. (Water & Valves visible) ------------------------ UTILITY POLE \ / CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN _ LIGHT POLE i - WC g � / _ \\\ � � U LIST OF WAIVERS REQUESTED �. DATE: ---------------- - \ �1 DRAIN MANHOLE HD % \ 1.SECTION IV A.'1.f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY (230) FEET I, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO �\ FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SEWER MANHOLE /' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY \ / THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS \ 2.SECTION IV A.4.a WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN LENGTH, AND IN CONC = CONCRETE 1 // OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY \1 \\ PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DATE: ____-_-__ ---------- SBDH STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE / / DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. / SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 }" CALIPER, FND FOUND /// / I �1 330 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. ly1 WCR = WHEEL CHAIR RAMP / -------_--------------------- 1 NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY CIITY CLERK \ \ [ROD = IRON RODM L0 TREE /i / rn p N n N+ No . N \ ��1 EXISTING CONTOUR - - - -1 Oa- m N - - N ?RDx/ Min m^' - a III F II a F TI ^ \ N r PROPOSED CONTOUR --------- 104 _______ > 0" Pi/ / '0t - 'Np Oa�i - � H �> � r� Z \ \ - 0 COa� - mo. ,mo K - / Qe' a r II II ami= _ 0- _ 1 N 06 - O N 0 EDGE OF PAVEMENT ----------EP--------- // �x Zt . o o a M o rn (L V1 K= - t-- 11 II N I n 11 O n �, M N r VERTICAL GRANITE CURB VGC - /;� P j _ F �� j - pROPQSED (� �> oo- z +a a N +- - /' V) 0 +roM - \ 1 - z - 0t, oza- W OVi a; .N zo SEAL �ZN OF MAS aVtrr _ O_ n - wIIn II o ^m.- o PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES /� `n V1 a _ - : o< - - of mo O Opt a�0 MV11Y ^ aFll OZaM =,O XO o N �� SSC x Co +ov V)zan aFnil o+ a � n o o`' PETER M. yGN N 1., 11 II a- \ of O* ^ ,r 4y m m to / +00v Inza > o¢ 1 w aN II Coo^ O CIVIL w /- o o vi � n II .� \ a Naz o=� n .. vtm + PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION t4e.2s 0 ro o ^ 0 0^ z r \ w s BLAISDELL,JR. � o -+ w 11 4 11 ar= 11 - n. wa_ oo��z �Z wF na 11 - _ 0.41613 SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION /7 ./ op- z 0��N ��N� -a4aoa �z - ,99 0 �2 r- II - - . . - am rr - - o_jQ _. 57 ✓/ o zo U) 0-V)Fx SER I �\ ao�� EI - .DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND G w N a WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. �G m .n -In z a o o N Co - a it N o II II 0Q / \ E / V)+�,t O ZO a Z Z 0_h Z / `_ Sa i 46% i n 3 / �N . � o w mM aa�` a-V7� _ Nop 1 9 P P / \ 2" HDPE %n/ x o0 ONNM aF II - - � / s-o.ss� 5 Drainage Pipe Slopes 1/29 2016 N 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 1 Z6 o z e II o A�q, / \ \ e °� 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 Y LlJ /+N n 08^ Z a u o ? 5 \ 2 Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015 \ 1 Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015 - RP1N / / ao 11 N ro - ?E 0 / / - __ - _ - - - - - 8" PVC SEWER 5=0.657 / , - / ._ NO. REVISION DATE .. - Z / 6/CE aVtM . Np / - - . - - . : 1 1 - / N II z ♦T SEWER & WATER - - 8" PVC SEWER 5=0. 57 - APPRO RIGHT $- o W 11 1 LESS THAN 10' STA. 3+52 - - `_/ / / a U v7 a ^ / STA. 2+83 SEPARATION VERT. SEP.=4.3' 8" PVC SEWER 5=0.65% n a 3 VER7. 6EP.=,.7' DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE / PPP OX LEFT g" PVC SEWER 5=0.657 O / / B. PVC \ WOODLANDS ROAD MO o a o , / 5=057 8" P S-�% 8�� PVC SEWER 5=0.657 - / : ul) \ - - TD, UTI N� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS OWNER: BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL 18 WALLACE ROAD L' +�nN 01- 6 .- / (n LYNN, MA 01901 , - LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 )y WILLIAMS ATTT T T A 1� TC' 00- Z 0 N �' / / VVILLI AVIS 3.54% APPLICANT: - .66% 5O VC NSD REALTY TRUST SPARAGES 5.00% - ' 500'. VC rn ow1 / _ _ _ I 76 OAKVILLE STREET Dc s vlY rA O - N O O M n m M C, O "Y M r- M - O a M CO N d' eh O N 0, d' N a Ot - - N t= rn T M N N n O - O O r - M� O 'D t` - tet` O Oro . -to t`1 m � m t` o O N N ,D M N 10 NOM N - ^ O t` O M - - - - - n - N N 0 M D, n a O N N N to nn ro m N N N,D- ^0 01 n r - ro ro , t` a1 N N,o - O O �O to r, N m N to m a O 4.0 00 ' m ID a O �_ N N) ^ � LYNN, MA 01905 Ui oa Ni o d ri tri N ro ri o ao o of D ai pj of o 0 0 0 ^ o a = d M m� o 0 0 Ov o rn rn o 6 ' u rn N v ao v ri r m t; ri nl< tc m o tB [i r a 189 NORTH MAIN STREET N N N M rO / M r7 �a 4 ro r7 n� - F) M in � n a ,f1 a cD v t0 � O - t0 . O v n � �t0 d• t0 a r LO r IA r` to n!n to r- to W to rn to to to rn uo i Lo rn N U7 In rn� a d' a M M d' rM ,t M M � d' M Y .r M"r 't r1 v d• - a a v PROJECT LOCUS: i _ _ - ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ _ - _ _ - ^ ^ _ ^ ^ . ^ r _ _11 ^ = CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA SUITE 101 DATUM= MIDDLETON, MA 01949 125.00 00 / +50 1 +00 _1 1 +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+0� 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 J 10+00 10+50 ASSESSORS REFERENCE: S PHONE: (978) 539-8088 of a' a w oc �� MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 o a a a a a a Of �a Of of a s Ln V) 0' . 20' 40' 80' o WOODLANDS ROAD N _ a N a �o PROFILE SHEET 1 OF 2 ..o - n `"7° _ - o - o - - ^ ;'_^ - _N - n n 00 - o o SCALE: 1"=40'(HOR) & 4'(VERT) AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 4 OF 11 CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN A 24 DATE: ---------------- SEE PROFILE SHEET 1 /i' / / "b2d e .. LC CASE 7159 1 N 27 PROPOSED SHALLOW ^�G o• O _ I, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO DMH RIM-137.5 3 b O. 4 'O - - 15" 9A'=134.25 b SS&,�S!\�S HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY ' o x ..05 / a; os . 2 o S! o yJ O THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS 1 s Sr ! 0 55 o y J 23 NOTE: ALL TRAP ROCK �n ! y ` +e s OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY IN BASIN 2 TO BE / ! yo° 000 A 47+71.98 �� DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. 1' DIAMETER STONE o 1 - > z ti p� ,O ------------------- ----- : _ . / PROPOSED 13" �yS^ , O• S S CITY CLERK PROPOSED 12 FES INV. IN=133.0 g IV) +Ir \ /♦ - ,0£ ire W p $'9s6!!p ` - FES INV-127.q/1 INTO SEDIMENT FOREBAY 1 O n�/ v ♦�;, � - y TOP-130.0 ♦ - U 11 i W w u OS! J 41 SPILLWAY 0 129.5 BOTTOM-128m0 / `♦♦ `7 N / 00 PC N I O �+ 9.10 PVC S 'ER S:O�! N /4S�6 § - - / // / �'�' ♦ ♦ / ` 1 d �] n 'o h S ��°o° o+1e.1z >p o / ! 0 �i �/ C�1 �� I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED `3 h v"� " " 3 'q2 . 30 PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE ! h h . MM , WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS o O 22 RIM=132.83 l / r /�' N n n �r c 4 6+95.29 ��/ s p ^ '0 2.5" ORIFICE 0128.50 c T Soo ,� ,� 5 oMM s 11 OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN o suss I , wa n 9 U PREPARING THIS PLAN. 12" RCP INV. OUT=127.50 1 ♦ �3 ��'/� g � o�� OPEN Nig D n n $ G, 3 y0 565 - .n oo?y s Y'� - - : : - ♦\ \\�w , , Jp . . 0�� _ - '� 90 s ° Qo 3 SPACE PROPOSED 18" \o i / , Q _ n �- o AGF'\N,, 0 op so HDPE INV.=128.50 `\ 0 s w 3G (SET LEVEL) / -----S & SPA AGES LL - \ 1 -- �I/' WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC � � o �p :. }+72.82 STREET ucHT 0 INFILTRATOON BASIN 2 (vP) (HydroCAD, Pond 143P) / Un N I 00 ) 8 h a +9zn 21 \ TOP OF (BERM=132.5 C ` owo n/ BOTTOM OF BERM=128.0 \ N C6n Pfd G 0 O 8'L EMERGENCY O_p n ` \v V 3 8 0 0 30 SPILLWAY 0 132.0 i ��ZL C4 0 - �p CASE 7159 a C7 1W LLo PROPOSED FES ao 11 Jed \ \ 19 r N r , ! \ 12" INV=126.50 INTO SEDIMENT FOREBAY \\ �\ TOP-126.0 n s Gv 7 DBLGRA7 E08C 4'L SPILLWAY 0 125.5 7cy�o STATION= +93.9$ a a _ _ - - _ _ _ i ...♦ \ BOTTOM=124.q " �Zv V� RIM-18.43 \ m 12" INV-144.43 mm 12" HDPE DRAIN - APE pfyplN _ � INFILTRATION BASIN 3M (HydroCAD Pond 152P) 6 _ R �.? 'W RIP-RAP CHANNEL \ TOP OF BERM=t 18.5 Z+®.99 St N e cNtE (SEE DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 4) \ BOTTOM OF BERM=115.0 PROP. DROP DMH * N+ , 8'L EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 0 118.0 \ . CITY OF SALEM 3 � RIM-149.81 =m6 PLANNING BOARD ,II, ® E cD0 ��5 O' / 12" INV=141.25 IN `A \ _ - _ - +98.99 411 12" INV-138.0 OUT G /, a \{ \ O S 0Sl a u' F - - I 1 i - I 1 _ - 5 ----------------------- o O•ybf`da o. G 5O / PROPOSED 18. 1 M INV= BIOS 1D 20 (SET 1LEVE) ITS 1 12" FES HOPE � ------------------------ o INV.=113.00 - _ W/RIP RAP (n INFILTRATION BASIN 1--_4 _ NOTE: ALL TRAP ROCK PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE IN BASIN 3 TO BE i RIM=136.50 _ * f ------------------------ - 1' DIAMETER STONE 1Jf z Q 4" ORIFICE 0 132.50 _ _ 1 oil ------------------------ 8" ORIFICE ® 134.00 pROp �t PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE Q 10" ORIFICE * 134.50 2. W� Sf0 G S I RIM=118.83 Q O 12" RCP INV.=131.50 HDPE DUN (Sff OONE CNE SwAtr � 1 l 8" ORIFICE 0 115.50 O a[ SHEEFK DAMS I 12" RCP INV.=113.50 ------------------------ / PROPOSED FES a / 12" INV=129.75 - 1 W/RIP RAP APRON � I ------------------------ \ ------------------------V)o Z ON -. t0 _ _ - \ Ca)0 a ` PPRo 0 0 = DATE: ------------ ------- - (qN by \ kCf a'- II MN - LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS I to oo°�� \\_.�PROX q \� rr < z - V) 00 - O IC -� _ \p. N D:_ 0 N G� In ZNn W N II it OP MON- ITORING W ELLo oo 03 CL In O= ~OSED a w� _ FIRE HYDRANT vow „ \\� X M u N WATER GATE SEAL �PVtN OF MgSSAcy s PETER M. CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) BLASDEL,JR. o CIVIL m UTILITY POLE :.. No.41613 G/STEPc o Q LIGHT POLE £ 90 N _ - El - DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND PROPOSE_D 8" C.L.D.I. WIATER DRAIN MANHOLE OD WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. Z Ci �� SEWER MANHOLE 0 STA. 0+87 I I STA. 0+94 - - - - - - - CONC = CONCRETE - - 5 Rip Rap Channel detail note 1/29/2016 ' VERT. SEP.=5.9'- VERT. SEP.=5.8' -. - 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 SEWER WATER SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE LESS THAN 10' 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 SEPARATION FND = FOUND 2 Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015 8" Pvc 5=0.5� 8" PVC 5=0.57 1 Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015 B" PVC 5=0.57 :. WCR = WHEEL CHAIR RAMP; NO. REVISION DATE c N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY - - DEFINITIVE PLAN & PROFILE IROD = IRON ROD o �i TREE SOUTH RIDGE CIRCLE N I LIST OF WAVERS REQUESTED SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 50 VC - 1 .00% 50 VC 1.SECTION IV A.1 .f WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM CENTERLINE RADII OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY EXISTING CONTOUR -- -iG4-- ` OWNER: 00 N In m 00 0 In o uD1,", n u3 0 a o M (230)) FEET FOR CURVED STREETS, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW THE ROADWAY LAYOUT AS PROPOSED CONTOUR toa BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL rn ul a n ryo In In ry o n n, ry cy p o m cow o .r SH01WN ON PLANS. In N 100 N In^ -0 i j In In n In I!) In 7 �n � Ing 0 0 CN In In 0) O)_: � � � - __ _ _ --_�•----C; 6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 18 WALLACE ROAD _ _ _ U) � EDGE OF PAVEMENT EP LYNN, MA 01901 DATUM=135.00 _ ^ 2.SEClfION IV A.4.0 WHICH REQUIRES CUL-DE-SAC STREETS NOT TO EXCEED 500 FEET IN VGC LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 WILLIAMS 0+0 0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2+00 2+50 LENGTH, AND IN PLACE THEREOF, ALLOW A LENGTH OF 1089.03 FEET FOR ROAD AS SHOWN VERTICAL GRANITE CURB c � caG_ J d ON PLANS. APPLICANT: J NSD REALTY TRUST n ^ R Ar'+ S U U _ d [� PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES SPARAGES L0 LO p C`01 I"J"LJ " U U U - 76 OAKVILLE STREET E� ENGINEERS i PUNNERS i SURVEYOR C o 0 Of _0 SOUTH I H a Of � 0) 0) 3.SECTION IV RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY WHICH REQUIRES STREET TREES TO BE 3 LYNN, MA 01905 Do o N Ht 01 n Do CALIPER, 30 FEET ON CENTER, AND, IN PLACE THEREOF ALLOW TWO (2) TREES PER LOT. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 14e.zs 189 NORTH MAIN STREET + (NM RIDGE N � o, m ° PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE 101 0 0 0 06 + N + N N NOTE: THE APPLICANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS LIST DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDDLETON, MA01949 CIRCLE r\ C) PHONE: (978) 539-8088 0 0 + + + N ASSESSORS REFERENCE: FAX: (976) s39-Szoo o MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 0140 40' 80' PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 2 SCALE: 1 "=40'(HOR) & 4'(VERT) AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 5 OF 1 1 \ / WF D28/ / . \ / nzas x 112.666s WF U22 PROPOSED x 112.2 / l x 1iz.33 nl.ea x tn.6o MAINTENANCE WF D24 WF 023 f \ WF D21 / \\I FOR SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE BASIN USE A MIXTURE / VEHICLE ACCESS �/ x 111,66 /, ' "`"soi + x1�L83 WF D20 OF GRASS SEEDS CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING PERIODIC x nzal 22 WF x sa \ \ x 111.7 x 111.98 / \ - WF D26- \ x 106.06 INUNDATION UNDER WATER, AND DROUGHT TOLERANT 5 x ns.1z x 113.16 x 113.55 x 11.3. \\ DURING SUMMER (TYP) \ rlti , 2' • --Mflx.e, x 111s2� \x tms] - 3.]] -- "2- -- GEORGE M. & v' \ \ JEANE07 H. TORION / r. \ \ 07_-000 -- 1010 � � 114.ALFRED $ JQAD! }.}a-x 115.44 - ' ''--- 1\ \x toe. \ D x91o6.0 � GAIL L. FIALHO / w \� l .- FRANCES LUCIA NQ tqs- ` -L JOSEPH & \ \wF D18 07-0003 / LORRAINE M. / L\OUTSE P-SL�(SO !� PAUL, PALLE JOHN \1m.]9 x 105.01 \x 109.22 / GAGNE TRUST ILIR & ESMA HYSENESHI / U 7-0005 _ - & 5CO1T LEB NC - �Q7-, O \ \ 04.96 07-0076 ,\oNWF 017 / 07-0002 / WILLIAM M. MONROE, JR. I J 07-0086 I ESAY. PROP.--, / -125- M 07 A 001 G / 4V-TRAIL / 28 RICHARD L. O'DAY \ �ti 1TYP ✓OWN SPACE T} / \ \ \ \ ' \ / I 03-0137 Ja?S -\ PROP o ED-DfH }32- -_ F--1-00 BUFFER -1014L \ \ 108 OG \ , iosofi.o3 / - - 1%q \ • , /� -STATION 2 2 }34 �0 '.Wr- / �\ \\ \ x tas.NJF D15 - I RI PROPOSED SMH / / ti \ r r?@`� r5f �_Iz gi % 338- `'� \ \ \ \ \ WF 0tebaa I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED / RIM=137.77 /"TF/EEEV=1331\ ro \ i 1010, \\ _- `, \ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ x los.i�os.,s WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS INV=132.61 / (o s cw OBSERVE \ 3 J3, / / �� \ \ wN ro 1x3 '\ e \� \ \ .\ OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN S � � \ i / \ `� _\� \ \� �• �\ \ PREPARING THIS PLAN. I \� o / 144- - - \ \ \WF 013 OPEN SPACE 1 r \ \ \ \ �^ ; ,�•` / / ^ �_ \" -• \ ` x 102 92 - \ _ x 104.96 EDGE OF BORDERING FOR SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE BASIN USE A MIXTURE loss9� VEGETATED WETLANDS OF GRASS SEEDS CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING PERIODIC ------------------- \ \\ > � g0 *485 \ \ INUNDATION UNDER WATER, AND DROUGHT TOLERANT WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC �4� �o / \ 0 F_y145 0 �/ o- r r o \ r \ \ =MIT 0 \ \ \\\\ \ \\ 1t,1 DURING SUMMER (TYP) _ , -1334 M }3 ` R� s 6.40 Gap- \ `\ \ 203.28_ . \ \ \ \� PROPOSED LIMIT OF EROSION CONTROL 25' MIN. OFF OF EDGE OF B.V.W. - I � '`_.r,1'•.(1 _ 0� \_. �_�/ �'� / X59• /Ii -X0158- t , - - _� - �'� \ -`.-� \ \�\\\\ \\�\\ \\ \ \ x 105.93 x 105.05 JG PROPOSED SMH P \ /// / X v\ ' / 143.5 / \ 148 !! 5 / o T SQ_ ]4gs A 1f \ \\ \� \�. \\ \\ WF D11 x ioss3 x 104.77 WF 01 �\ �\\ \\\ \ �><-w,"I - x 104.5] WF D7 - INV=131.66 o \ / Ng h h O ../ 1 s _ _ \C,1.�7g$•S6 \\\ \ \ � �W D10 WF DS x >\1 105.03 F // _ �i 1 O/ \ i \r- '- ,4 `�. \. ' WF 09 --x-•,o5. 6 x tos,3a� / S '\ 5• ,� �J p �. f _5 - \ \ \\\ \\ '\x ,oa.dz 107_6 _- +5.556.3 _ x 106.1.. F05D6 x toe.2z r HYD. - / '� , ' _- "-�\�\ \ \\\\ \ \ _x as a] - / - GF�� \ $0 �0 _ ^3 - \ � �mzs= z- - � \ WF D2 �61 SMH. WG,aa- � Q 3f �. ]iB -- J „_,_�-- x 108.52-- x 106.78 x 106.98 x 105.17 . .z 105.22 -/ imm136.7 •II'r S ,L 0 �O. S /I / \ 1Sp °\ /, S \1010.,\ \\.\ - \ - - . '- y •_N\ - WF D3 / x ,06.1v - nVT131.44 _ \\ - �-+, 105.58 / � y / , S \ �--- • �\ ,, WF DS WF D4 8 SEWER PROPOSED SMH /' ,Lq' / W / 7A -Sp: ,6j5 \�s \ \\ \\\� \, \ - - = x«}07,6 _ • +«.0s. 4 400 / ,0. RIM=138.33F S _ • _ _. . - 'x-raz.za -x 106.71 INV=133.33 �AtiiP° It4. ,p '_ JEFFREY M. & s o l / s `-� . ti ( > \ PROP. / / CITY OF SALEM � >r // CZ � �\O. \\ \/, ,22 -o'--- .. -10.10 / \ 1 _ _,21.3 - ELLEN T. ROGATO - F \\ 4'WRT IL / , w \ \ \T\ \/� ,20 - _ 112 ,e\ ✓ �a \ \\ \ \\� , \\ �, ,2zs \�`\ -. �) -_ �- -- � � / PLANNING BOARD �1 \\ p• / N , ,5 ' \ �� 02-0046 f� \\ � (TYP � Ay0 "'OI 14 $ D 1010_ �6 � -,\E _- Q � _ - - / m st EiEV t 3Yt 1 5 \ 2 1 ^3 T\,S \ \ ' . \ INFILTRATIO t 17 - ------------------------ : V / I CF 49 ' 0, \ \. S` _ N BA 4 /� 'C ,'\ 0 \ 7 i- \\ / / CF. _ __ F' EN RED '�18'�. . - hF 06 1 ESHG BW - ®l14A6 _ 4 JS o a 16j5 so\ 4 ( JS o7IAS \ �' 120 1010 _, \` 7 (<` PiQ QO\ �\'j[i "� 0. V 47 ////O �J 0, I Y(J ' t•_� r S O \ \ \\\ \ __ _ `c� � 122.5� \ 0 x30 9• , Y! \ , ? 4B W \ '`p SO, v'� l \ \ O p a _ -�_-=_== / ------------------------' . . �if� O \ `�j // \ � � \10\�• ` 1 3 �1154 t 58 ._ A \J $0,50 5 Co rSp ,5? \ \ \ 7\� \ \\ \` _ � O O O O• P9' O O_- O O \ ------------------------ ----------------------- - \ o I -�. •'D� G Q �� 1�6/� �-� \ \ \ - C F 753 - �� Hca 1 J E#.'• \ `TO\ �\� \\ rn r}a .5 --�(f*o� N r \ \\ \ F�7746 S /xGo rs2 / I �IS3 S 1 . 1 q \ \� O _ '� \•. _ Poo\ - r4r5 SO•S?S o4 J? \\ s \ / So• I y`� - ' 32' ,' 1 2 p 1 - •- \-� Y\/ 1 \ /5 5 \ °S� / I 1 is ` \ 7F- O +4os \ 1 0 \ . O 131.5 O / - 00 40 ` \ \ \� t / \ S c \ \\� ' I o \ CF��7430 / �� \/\ \ ` A � , 154 15 ,44 i 50' \ \\ - 7 /. Ff ,b Z.S \ \ s \ a 6 O \ J ,\S.1/ 1g 7,\2•� 148 (GF= 144 O TFcSp 138 0 �./ ------------------------ 156:0 PROPOSED RETA NTNG WAL \ \�\\ \ 44 \� J cF \/ S4 \ 50, ,as oF_74pGF- MAINTENANCE WITH IMPERVIOUS \\ 736 \ \ \ 7 �\ y S \ 1 4 . ta6 6F 7 0 50, / 148.5 PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS £ \ OF 0 \ \ \` O \\ \J4 \ 1\ \/ \ r \ 4gp az 141 / NTENANCE ------------------------ PROPOSED BARRIER rp `� qTi \ \ a� \ \ \ \ 'S S IS �' \ -\I 5 0„ '� i - VEHICLE ACCESS CULTEC SYSTC&M l y OFS �61E .� N @y \ \ \ 168 O.?S 04 ,5 \._ \ \\ / aaa O NNQ S q N T 1T5't\ 34`73? S/N 7 \ \ \ \ 1G7 / 766 / / ' .0 0 \ URvNC nV,y \ \ \� f \ '\ ' �y \ x'76 o N /\ \\ t4i.o ------------------------ ti \ 9A MMFR FR W FCF TyF a@� / -� // /\ \ \ 4 i I s4\\� w \ \HI S sc/ 136 / v R, 9q rP z �Ev 69'� \ \ 17- 162-_ /el a ------------------------ yOhTNppMi �V. ' ------------------- °G I TFpF�R�O RF - \ 15 ! o TRAN 2014 p< / \ "'W SIC / a � a � y �- v �.P`fl� -- -.. ! CR o / / \\ � / � �\` •�\ $ � 10 i 46.56Pr - ' DATE: - . r REALTY TRUST �\ �J 06-0019 TADEU & /� 30• \\\i_ r /� -15 ._ 0- / / Y/\\ �\ t4a.5� us., \ Z � J NA // Iho / \ \�\5 -- -- --_ yo / \ / / _ �. � o•4e� \ \ / 1 � t4 w EXIST. DMH D \ / B CIKONlSKI // ho �a.o I of 9 \. \ _ / , l 5 w� O P\� 06-001 / h� O \ / \ `15 \ \ 146 \ w T 0 \\ RIM=124.16 Fi •L \ J t � $ w - INV=119.3 \ A 4 /: 43 / G V /$ � \ \ / c� / I \ �ti - GF'�Q \\ \ CF,15r• *a �/ SALEM % \_ o. -y \ G , 44 0 � \ CONSERVATION 148. ' 151.0 ,qq 5p .0 4@\ �6 \ u6 COMMISSION S S �51� `` / t 4 0.0 \ 06-001 1 � \ w - . y ® g9 153.0 p I J Co IS2 0 �tSD� �,� 1 \.. �a ' s• :\ I � i j 25 0F�i4 gs z I - . ' G� ' // _ _ ••� � � � \� s 9�'r �\ I S // 753 -. _ \ \ .,. I / I S0, g•O 00",�o-°' \ N .: ` - LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS F PROPOSED �/ � w MAINTENANCE \ _ c �w-�o�w J VEHICLE ACCESS \ � \\ ^ o r s �� \.•� / gco c� / / MAIC `\ \ iQ > s 7S 152 /\y 5 50 bh O" 1 ^a6 I EXI STING TO 143.5 MONITORING WELL \ �\� p> o GRA FIRE HYDRANT " // ' \ or�� . / 15 s\ AGF/\�k. li/ q�� _ .i d `� >/ o \ IS 0 04 / J SO 50 b O - 0.q - / WF 811 Sim (Pump-Assumed t \ O�A 1 R;m_,2ass 1 ` ` ,� s,.o 1 5 w i 152 r3. -� �. j � / � � � 47- 1az.n_ WF 810 - Inv-N.A. (Water & Valves visible) - - \ / 1 Q 1 20 \` 1 TF' 148 0 15 \ �, - ' SCALED T _ . WATER GATE �' \ w O\\ � 14 155• o D � 141.94 J ` I > \ \ - L E O - DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND ZONE \ WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) 0 - p - 0 / ' zax wF 68 we TF 1525 \ o ' ./\ s \, 5 Yl i / / � \ 1 WF B9\r !19 CF=lt\ .5 \ 14@ �- 1 �:5\ �� r / i� WF 82 14312 51 UTILITY POLE �Q,7 - \ \. \ •�`�\ �\ O( / GF= \ .•. \ x / W142.34 uz.0e 141 ON- .N HrD \ \ /- K \ \� \ \ \ ,r _ 50' - x uy.as �x14z.os - NON- LIGHT POLE \ I \ \ \ r 74 -j44'5 , - - �2 _ -.• JURISDICTIONAL I 5 Remove Future Parking Area 1/29/2016 WAND 4 Planning Board comments t/22/2016 �-- WF B3 0556 ISOLATED . DRAIN MANHOLE - '� \ \\ xk .83 O x 143. s ' WF B7 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 a D \ p _ _ 14 � 1 / 0.08 ACRE-FO ,4ss n �� \\ J3 \ \ \� - ` _ -_� - / „ \ wF ea j 14279 2 Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015 SEWER MANHOLE 0 I \� \ / �� -� ' l \ 9 9 9 S / p \ \ / �\� 4x.07 1 Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015 _N -- / \ 143.33x 141.64WFB / M / �i � _\ 2@ \ \ -,\_�--- - /. • _ _ , _--�-- - / _ \ \ / 7 � wF B6 N0. REVISION DATE CONC = CONCRETE l� � �\� r 2 \ \134 - -_- r// \\\ \\ �� 1 X14794 4'4x.01 - .PROPOSED STONE r /� \ �4�, > i - _ / \ / J x 142.63 4,wRo�L r TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN N SBDH - STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE a \ "� / '// �/ "� \\ ' I \ 27 ) n n N\ CHECK DAMS SDt D.C. (TYP) ��\\ I l THE WOODLANDS SUBDIVISION FND = FOUND / \ s \ �p. \ , •f i '� . / OPEN/SPACE`2 / / \ �'�\ \ \ \: 3 WCR WHEEL CHAIR RAMP SURYA" & \ \ r' o�1 \ �� \ a Q ' i / \� 1 11 �\ \ \ \ �' \ ( SALEM MASSACHUSETTS ISABELLE WIRYO �\ / ` �� ' NFjCrRq�pN Eslycwr® 81B � \s s. s 'moib 144 - i a N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY / 06-0015 \\ •. ,16�� BgST11 ® 1T f y/ 12 - %//� �/ �' 142 OWNER: 116 ` , >\\�2 _ PROP. �` / �. \ :_ .•c�'ol ! \ \ BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL IROD = IRON ROD - �� 1r6, 118 115 ?, - 4:W �?A�� / o e. \ 140 \ \ 18 WALLACE ROAD 1 ��_ > �. � �.m ) f 3tt--- \ _ LYNN, MA 01901 -\ ` ` 172``=\1=8 � _/ `� _ - / / /� / ` 1 1 I ' ' „1 _ - - N TREE - LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 s CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL WILLIAMS APPLICANT: ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL _ ONE-FAMILY q7� EXISTING CONTOUR -104- - _ - NSD REALTY TRUST- DATE: - SPl-]�.AGES (R1 ) (I) (R1) CLUSTER / - ----------------'- 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS . PROPOSED CONTOUR ------104 ---- 3 I, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) LYNN, MA 01905 > 189 NORTH MAIN STREET EDGE OF PAVEMENT -- - - - - - - _ - _ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE 'NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF TIHIS PLAN BY MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) SEAL PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE tel VGC THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. (NONE) �SHOFMgss CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDOLETON, MA01949 v VERTICAL GRANITE CURB OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY - 45% 30% �� 9pyG ASSESSORS REFERENCE: - - PHONE: (978) 539-8088 - LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING:- 30% DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT PETER M. m MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 s BLAISDELL,JR. a PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES -�-�- CIVILN 1 1 MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 'FT No.41613 , 0 20 4o so TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 1 OF 2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 148.x5 --------- CITY CLERK -- ------ MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT 90 rsr a��e 0 MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT o SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION SCALE: 1,1=40' _ SHEET 6 OF 11 AUGUST 14, 2015 � � J E'iy'�• \ �O. �� t f 4'-� .5 -� qp '� ry � \ \ \\ � C,c\/�3$ .� sx0 ,S r t '�`�/14��\ I ` \\, .$ \�I � ^ \l •j�� 38.0 �/ " \ o \ t �� V Q �^°,� � \\ � \� ' ,ss o'$•s° ow ,� \\ � x � ( o' 3 � ' . 44 �\ •\ +42s / / A° �� 11 �' ____ -- / i 50' — - \L 130.9 13 5 � 7J \ � � \ x ° 4• \ /„ \ �\ �I�y 1 \\ "� �43.,Q � iq6 o TF-141.0 ;0 2 O . '- .1F, t52.� Iq8 r1 CF. i 14 50• 39' \,381 _ J 131 132.2 /3 1 3 h C,TF. `--_ _ �•�q 1 ` 1 \ �'\ =1.50:0 PROPOSED � GF- � 144 M rFct$ � 0 � ter• PROPOSED RETAINING WAl \ , \ /jVF 13 \ \ \�\ qq \ {, '� 7 50. 146 CFS 1 0.0 4D 32"Gp. I MAINTENANCE / WITH IrnPERvtous \ \� ' \ \V\ O /� \ 4 \\ \3 \I 4 . 148 GF 1 4 50 5 PROPOSED J p9 4 s g 'S \ 4g i•CS 142 1�8' w VEHICLE ACCESS ` / PROPOSED BARRIER OF 0 \ \ ; N \ \ \ \ \\ s SQ%2 HI EE ACCESS TP -1 O \ \ \ \ CULTEC SYSTEM --168 S \� 1 � \ / � J/\ y� �� \� \ -' � � v fR � ti'•4T"�f �'F �� `//'/� / \ \ I / � Esq �\� � w � � � � I dal , -� = �\ � '" ...-t36. -'' � / ��y \ q� OYpt FR 8iT6q�/N U TP sHwr� s 162` °f I OR 7��w. SF e t \ n 1 w s+ a -' ✓ D xa A T0� pFRi p UR f o ` m o148 4.04,a s TRAN 2014 f 0/ a a ''15 / _ O r _ / f cR ; / / \� / \ \` ��` to$+oo- 10+48.56FT I ��,y � F REALTY TRUST 1 ��NT 0 / a ryy , — mom . 06-0019 / TA'DEU & Z J \ J NA D / B CIK01(JSKI // 1 o ti� EXIST. DMH \� \ 06-001 / h ^'a o' n° \ \ / / �'� ` 1 1 s \mow RIM=124.16 ��P i / 4ii u^o V \ \„—�/ I \ ��`a1 5 — 4s I \ o \ 's / I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED INV=1ls.3 / � � h \ eti �y i cF�n1 , �I \ WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS 1$ \ o / I , G \ CF` 5t *e SALEM / / / \� �o- �' \� \� t4q w OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN G$0 .0 0 � 1q8` \\ n6 CCOMMISSIONN 151.0 PREPARING THIS PLAN. n ' I H / ? 0 S o / • ,5 j 1- ,\ \ / 1*3s qs s0o \I 1 y 06-0011 -' rF,$o' / Q ------------------- J/ /\ D� /® `yry \ 5 I FF'ts?o WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC yo Q \ \ �j/� �i15 S v / `� ,g J 25 .1, 45 z 4 GAF PROPOSED \ I/�� 1 4� W144 r MAINTENANCE -40o VEHICLE ACCESS - 11 �� ^ o s / �— \`\ �: //.° yo vm ta2 .►` o \ .� 6/ ! ` EXI MATCH s S 5 5 6• ♦6` STING O 1x3.5 \ \ 15 h�'�O /� �- // / 1 GRADES / 1l; \1 \\ it o� 50 c�F �g `, y ,e / �N / WF B71 \ 7so 1 NH Pump-Assumed : \ h =114.56 \ /� w /\ 151.0 5 5 w / 152 O: "-� \ / t 1 q2 WF Bto Inv=NA (Water dt Valves Hslb/e) \ 1 20 \\ \ 1 t /: 151.5 1F�A4BO �• /� 150 \ \ / i 1 I J�/"11_ED �O�^ O \ r 4 `.t so '\ o CF= 3 -\ o , / — ZON tNE \ / ® We \ \` 14s \ / TF 152.5 0 s°\� �F \5o' E <1 i j / / X88 \ E \ / mo. \ \ \ ` \ \ �\\\'RF 1 GF-15A-5 ` /� 'q6 _� \ 1 *c �� // �i WF B1 WF 82 WF 89 1 _/— 1�ti� NON- CITY OF SALEM ` 22 _�— -••` �- - JURISDICTIONAL WF Bs WETLAND I / ` PLANNING BOARD ACRE- 7 - (0.08 WF B �,a _ , Ba / �. ------------------------ WF 115�� —— /WF 36 /�� /� / • . "� --� \� , 7 2 _� 134 - ._-- -,�' _--, _ —. _ \ / � _ � � � _ . PROPOSED STONE / / �\ 2R�`�\`\ �' ' \\ \ r PROP. / CHECK DAMS 50't O.C. Iry (TYP) j// ! 2\\I \1 'vo _ - _ / _ // /�� \\\\ \ 27 / 4' TYP IL / ------------------------ \ 3 EE� �� ,7 \�?° \r•�r, OPEWSPACE-2 \` ( ) I S U RYA 1 1k r - \elolB , ,s s s a l // %. \ 1\ \\ \ \ \ \ �' 44 — ----------------------- /'F TP��11 2 EL 16' r' �' •. v — 1 ISABELLE WIRYO RA\oN e EsMcwr ® ttdim� .�j \ 12 j oh, ! ` \ / 06-0015 �-. 1185` �� ` 1 gS9� 3 / /� \ t42 PROP.// / ..-- --" •r•� � 1 '�. S\�� 11g, 118 115 o Nc' u - 4'W�RA1LZ / // / 1 00. ! I I r I \ \ 140 \ ------------------------ - � 116 tt8.5 �/ ii f // // / / _ , \� / -'•^ I . � ` 136- \ . \. �' ."� \ - \ WF A2 \ 16—� R-SiDES-AND ABOTTOM-OF-iHE SIN USE? 11X1 N �\ -114 WF A13 W OF GRASS SEEDS C9P1 BtE bF WITHSTANDING PEI ICS / \ INUNDATTON GINUER WATER,-AND OROUGF?T T ANT' I I \ \ U \ WF A3 \ -1 — i WF A1� ------------------------ 12 \ Q�� \ � � --�UR1NG SUMMER`ZTYP) ' / WF / I 1 \ WF C6 110 / i N ------------ \ WF Al2 , I / ` WF fC5 \ : Z WF/N 1 WF Al - �. . \ NON- WF C7' - - . . I - W �. / / - I JURISDICTIONAL\ f t a _ \ \ --,WF A4 WF Al / 1 -/ WF �15 ( / - / / / I / ..I \ ISOLATED WF CS - y : _ .. \ PROPOSED LIMIT OF EROSION CONTROL \ / / / / WF C4 WETLAND t I O 25' MIN. OFF OF EDGE OF B.V.W. ' / / I . ' / / I 1 ------------------------ \ \ \ Ag / / I \(0.09 ACRE-Fh WF C1 ' ------------ _ / DATE: ----- \ _ \ 06 \ j F A� WF Alp I l l / / / ./... \ - WF C3 WF C2WF A8Z- WF A7 WF \ / WF AI EDGE�F BORDERING 1 10 \ \ VEGIETATD\\WETLANDS \ 114\\ 1 WF An } WFA20 ( / LEGEND OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS "- \ � _ _ -_. -- ' -- I �JAMES E. CONNICK MONITORING WELL FIRE HYDRANT '�,' II I` � `\ WATER GATE w� \ �. l \ 2 \ DENOTES A GRANITE STONE BOUND CATCH BASIN (DRAIN) I \ \ WF A21\ �� \ \ _, \ ' \ �8� \ � WITH A DRILL HOLE TO BE SET. UTILITY POLE \ \ t WF A22 OP N SP 26 .� \ \ 1 LIGHT P \ -1 CE 124 \ OLE / \ \ �\ / \ \ I 5 Remove Future Parking Area 1/29/2016 WF A23 \ Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 DRAIN MANHOLE Op WF A24 , \'� \ 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 \ SA & STNE \ ' l ' / 2 Testpits; Infiltration Basin designation 11/10/2015 SEWER MANHOLE WF A25 ' \ \ \_ �— -�� AGGE I�\RISS ` \ i 1 Drainage Design; Legend; Notes 9/4/2015 _ \ \ \ NO. REVISION DATE CONIC = CONCRETE WF A26' \ \ �\ \\ �_ \ \118rI�NN�\ \ oma \ TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN SBDH = STONE BOUND DRILL HOLE WF A27\ \ _._ � 7oQ 1p6��8 770 11�I�\j I FND FOUND "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION " WCR = WHEEL CHAIR RAMP WF A28 \ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY WF A29 ' _ . WF A33T ' OWNER: IROD = IRON ROD WF A3o WF A32 's BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL WF A31 WF A34� '^� LYNN4 18 , MA01901TREE WF A35 1 LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN WF A36\ `L�a APPLICANT: � � q WILLIAMS EXISTING CONTOUR —toa— — ZONE: ONE-FAMILY INDUSTRIAL ONE-FAMILY f o NSD REALTY TRUST SPARAGES (R1) (1) (R1) CLUSTER DATE: ------------------ ZI PROPOSED CONTOUR ----- 104 ---- e^ 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENGINEERS r PLANNERS r SURVEYORS WF A37 LYNN, MA 01905 EP MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 100 FT 150 FT (NONE) I, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO WF A38 PROJECT LOCUS: 189 NORTH MAIN STREET EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT 150 FT NONE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY SEAL SUITE 101 VGC MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 S.F. 40,000 S.F. (NONE) THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS 31�y�NOFMAs12 CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDDLETON, MA 01949 VERTICAL GRANITE CURB 45% ti PHONE: (978) 539-8088 ..LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING: 30% 30% OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY o PETER M. N ASSESSORS REFERENCE: MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: 35 FT 45 FT 35 FT DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. BLAISDELL,JR. MAP 6 PARELS 7, B & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 PROPOSED STRAW WATTLES MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FT 30 FT 15 FT - v 9 CIVIL o �e No.41613 o 20 4080, TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 2 OF 2 a Fcl T .t' PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION taa.2s MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FT 30 FT 10 FT ----------------------------- , SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION MINIMUM REAR YARD: 30 FT 30 FT 30 FT CITY CLERK SCALE: 1°=40' SHEET 7 OF 11 ((0 AUGUST 14, 2015 A NOTE: -STANDARD HYDRANT TO MEET CITY OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK TO BE USED ONLY WHERE IT SALEM REQUIREMENTS BRICK SHELF I WALL OF MANHOLE WILL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED EARTH. SLOPE 1 '/FT. VERTICAL GRANITE FINISH GRADE, USE RESTRAINED JOINT FITTINGS (MEGALUG 'OR PUMPER CONNECTION BREAKAWAY FLANGE vP BINDER COURSE CURB, TYPE VB MATERIAL VARIES APPROVED EQUAL) WHERE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS FACES ROAD UNACCEPTABLE. B vv , C� FLOW B TOP COURSE SIZE OF BLOCK OR MEGALUG TO BE DESIGNED FOR 1 .5 : V . —� - - - - o�0c�0 TIMES NORMAL OPERATING PRESSURE, SIDEWALK VARIES 6 p0000 EDGESTONE N FINISHED STREET GRADE J BASE COURSE % � MIN. MIN. PIPE °° .v PIPE CRUSHED STONE POURED CEMENT SALEM STANDARD v v pv CONCRETE SADDLE 08 ° VALVE BOX AND COVER 0 0 �a 000 a 00 0 ACCEPTABLE UNDER ° °O SECTION M4 OF THE I GRAVEL' °000 12' MIN. cD BRICKS ON o 0 000 00080 massDOT STANDARD ACCESS TUBE o EDGE (2X8 EXPOSED) �o°o°oo 0 SPECIFICTIONS I n 4 MIL POLY OVER : STONE I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED BRICK CHANNEL APPLIES /� MASONRY RING WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS TO DROP CONNECTIONS AS VERTICAL GRANITE ITE CURB DETAIL CONCRETE 8" C.L.D.I. OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN WELL AS CONVENTIONAL. THRUST BLOCK . (NOT TO SCALE) WATER MAIN � . : I •, . PREPARING THIS PLAN. � A 6„ GATE VALVE 6" C.L.D I R.: PLAN WATER MAIN :. ------------------- `: IF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IS WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC — — — — - — — — — — -—-—-—-—-— - - USED, DO NOT BLOCK DRAIN SHELF ELEVATION SAME AS SLOPE 1 "/FT. c eo CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. ANCHORING TEE PROVIDE � CUBIC YARD OF SELEC° MECHANICAL JOINTS PROVIDE 12" SQUARE BY - ABOVE HYDRANT O RAIN TO 6" Q 6 INCH THICK . — — — WALL OF MANHOLE CONCRETE BASE UNDER HYDRANT BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL.--,, ° I _ — _ 6" HIGH CHECK DAM WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN TYPICAL FIRE HYD RANT CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD CONNECTION FOR HIGH oe e — — \�1R\, 12' \,1\\ OR LOW SERVICE LINE 8' MINIMUM � ° \ ------------------------ 1 o a 6 • � � 37 S 0 1 -2" CRUSHED 1�1 DETAIL 12" MINIMUM SCREENED <Op STONE i \ ------------------------ GRAVEL BASE. ' F Np-�\ i ' (NOT TO SCALE) BRICK ON EDGE ----------------------- UNDISTURBED EARTH VARIES (SEE PLAN) ----------------------- SECTION A—A ; CONCRETE COLLAR ` ------------------------ LLA GRASSED SWALE _ _ MANHOLE FRAME AND (NOT TO SCALE) COVER AS SPECIFIED 8 8 EXISTING GROUND SURFACE OR ------------------------ FINISHED GRADE ------------------------ BRICK FOR GRADE ADJUSTMENT - ?. . .° °° PRECAST TRANSITION SECTION ------------------------ ° OR BARREL SECTION WITH g ° PRECAST TOP SLAB di - _ ------------------------ .. C o BLEND - N a I ,, „ CONTACT TOP WIDTH = 6 —0 MIN. BLEND CONTACT DATE: ° I RUBBER "O"-RING GASKET AREA OR PREFORMED FLEXIBLE AREA BITUMINOUS CONC. TOP ° ° REMOVE 4'-0" UNLESS OTHERWISE- JOINT SEALANT AS SPECIFIED TOP & SUBSOIL COURSE AS SPECIFIED SAWCUT' EXISTING PAVEMENT, INDICATED ON DRAWINGS _ — — _ _ — — — — _ — — _ — BIT. CONC. BINDER APPLY TACK COAT COURSE AS SPECIFIED S<0 GRAVEL BASE AS SPECIFIED F 12 MIN. SAO EXISTING PAVEMENT MANHOLE RUNGS ° I f ; " „ o° MULTIPLES OF 1 ',2',3',4',5', _I tilt' G OR 6' LENGTHS AS REQUIRED COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXISTING BASE CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN 8" MINIMUM _ DATE: ------------------ > SEE PIPE CONNECTION EXISTING ''- _ I � ...: I I CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO SHELF ELEVATION SAME AS I , - CROWN OF HIGHEST PIPE. DETAILS THIS SHEET - SUBGRADE ,-_.' ; I ,-__ � i --! I_.._ _._._III „ - , - i -' 6 IF HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY : 8 MINIMUM �1 MIN. THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS _ 12 THICK MIN. LAYER o OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY _ OF 6"-S" DIAM. STONES no ^o DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. — — -° RIP RAP CHANNEL PAVEMENT MATCH CITY CLERK v ^ ' (NOT TO SCALE) DETAIL 12 ' MINIMUM THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SLAB SCREENED GRAVEL (NOT TO SCALE) SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE MANHOLE BARREL 5 Rip Rap Channel detail 1/29/2016 M 4 No changes to this sheet 1/22/2016 a SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAB BRICK OR CONCRETE FILL. WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2075 SECTION B—B XX a UNDISTURBED EARTH Q 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 1 Details 9/4/2015 0 2x2 x3 WOODEN STAKE NO. REVISION DATE PRECAST SEWER MANHOLE CO 50-FT LONG DETAIL SHEET DETAIL ° ° ° O ° O ° o0o S T STRAW WATTLE o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn. ( " ) - 000000000°0°0°O°°00°00000° w (NOT To SCALE) 12 MIN °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°000°°°°°°° o "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION . - - 0°°000°000000°°°°°°°°°0000 -•, ,-: - :'.- ; _ '. 00000000000°0°0°0°0°000000 -- v _ - ° •- 000000000°0000000000000000 GROUND 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° ° 0 0 SALEM MASSACHUSETTS °O0°0°0°°°0°O°0°O°0°0°O°0 1 SURFACE °0°0°0°0°0°0°0°0°000°0°0°0 OWNER: .•, • ':p 000000000 000000000000000 CV - __ BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL > 18 WALLACE ROAD . , 11 USE CRUSHED STONE GREATER THAN 3-INCHES PLAN VIEW LYNN, MA 01901 "'6 r BUT SMALLER THAN LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 „ z 6-INCHES APPLICANT: WILLIAMS MPX. 1 -2 CRUSHED .- p � p NSD REALTY TRUST SPt][�1GES STONE : _ _ - - - - �00°°0.,0g000000000°0°0° 12" : - 76 OAKVILLE STREET „:: ENGINEERS ,. PLANNERS r SURVEYORS - - 'o FLOW 1.3 6" MIN: EXISTING LYNNTIP , MA 01905 GRADE SECTION VIEW SEAL PROJECT LOCUS: 189 NORTH MAIN STREET HOFMgssgo CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDDLETON, MA 01949 ��\ STAKED STRAW WATTLE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SUITE 101 PETER M. yGm ASSESSORS REFERENCE: S FAX (97897539-820088 STONE CHECK DAM DETAIL DETAIL o BLAISDELL,JR. MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 civil o e DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 4 No.41613 ` F� P� �� SCALE: NOT TO SCALE N (NOT TO SCALE) - (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) � AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 8 OF 11 , NAL GHT TREE PLANTINGS WHERE LOCATIIONS MAYEBELIMODIFIED SHOWN ON PLAN - BASED ON FINAL DESIGN BY - - - - - UTILITY COMPANY AND/OR °SALEM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT TYPICAL H2O INSPECTION PORT DETAIL:. : :. : : : PAVEMENT 40 LAYOUT W�_71_ ` 6' I ° > , . 6"SCH. 40 PVC OR ' FLOOR BOX FRAME AND LID SDR-35 PVC PIPE NEENAH R-7506 OR EQUAL s' 24' PAVEMENT 3 4 W/S.S. CAP SCREW LID C. GR; S CONC. :.....::.:........ RISER 24" SQUARE % T � p .T SIDE- •.•:.:::::..:.::::::.�.. CLOSURE �. WALK ::,.,:••.::•.•.:::....... :::::.:.. :::::::: PAVEMENT ,i ::•::•:::•::.•:::::: CLASS "C" CONCRET �0„ ::•: [ PAVEMENT SUB-BASE Lo CN 95%COMPACTED FILL VERTICAL GRANITE P�• HVLV FC-24 3/8 95% COMPACTED FILL FOOT CURBING 3/8" ti\ FEED CONNECTOR o F- ODT Of 4 OZ. NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC W �P� 3/8": FOOT 3/8 FOOT AROUND STONE. TOP AND SIDES � m N 2'7 6" MIN DEPTH MANDATORY; BOTTOM PER ENGINEER'S O x w 9 O O Mq� OF 1-2 INCH DESIGN PREFERENCE. w w w a ` in c O O - WASHED CRUSHED - - - z w E ? w MISC. STONE ABOVE I I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED 6" LOAM p O o CONDUITS AND BELOW CULTEC NO. 20L POLYETHYLENE w WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS & SEED in v GAS U CHAMBERS LINER ABOVE STONE BASE AND OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN (DEPENDING ON 12 DRAIN SIDEWALK ON J1� AVAILABILJN) ® ® ® BENEATH RECHARGER 330XL HD PREPARING THIS PLAN BOTH SIDES ; TYPE 1-1 O 8„ DIAM. PVC 4' WIRE MESHED (ZING - HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER SIDE PORTALS WHERE UTILIZING 1 2 IN DIA. WASHED o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAVITY SEWER REINFORCED ------------------- BITUMINOUS g' DIAM. INTERNAL MANIFOLD CRUSHED STONE CONCRETE C.L.D.I. WATER CONCRETE PIPE PER CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD SURROUNDING CHAMBER o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC 1 1/2 TOP MIX 8" GRAVEL BASE ENGINEER DESIGN . . HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER - AND INSPECTION PORT 2 1/2" BINDER (MAX. INLET= ASSEMBLY FROM o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12" GRAVEL BASE 24 INCHES) 1-2 INCH WASHED CRUSHED BOTTOM TO FINAL ELEVATION TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION STONE BENEATH AND (THIS CHAMBER ONLY') (NOT TO SCALE) AROUND CHAMBER BED TYPICAL CULTEC CHAMBER A B INSPECTION PORT 6" INTERNAL COUPLING CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY PLAN VIEW 10'-0" r----5-�--------7-r---------------7-r--------` -----r NOTE: THE CULTEC MODEL SHOWN HERE MAY IBE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE I I I I I I EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER . 5,-0" 6'_0„ I , - - - CULTEC NO. 20L POLYETHYLENE LINER TO - I PAVEMENT 1 -2 INCH DIA. WASHED, _ CRUSHED STONE 0 BE PLACED BENEATH 24" DIA ' ' 95/° 4 OZ. NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC HVLV FC-24 FEED CONNECTORS 4 OZ. NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC I I CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL.HD AROUND STONE WHEN UTILIZING 95% COMPACTED FILL AROUND STONE. TOP AND SIDES I I I C EANOUT CO ERI I I COMPACTED FILL- 1-2 INCH DIA ' (3 PLACES) HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER WASHED INTERNAL MANIFOLD MANDATORY. i i I 10.0" [254 mm] MIN. FINISHED CRUSHED L_______________1_L_ __.......... _�_________ - -' - \ RECHARGER 330 XL HD GRADE HVLV FC-24 FEED CONNECTOR r, =--� \ .. .ti/ STONE //. . .._. ,_•. ., , e ..., , _;> ".i ::: ,. _..,.:.. ".;'\� HEAVY DUTY CHAMBER WHERE SPECIFIED 10.0" [254 mm MIN. PLAN VIEW i 6.0" [152 mm1 MIN. / [ ] A 16.0" [406 mm] B MIN. 12' [3658 mm] //` 30.5" [775 mm] /� 6.0" [152 mm] MIN. EXTEND ACCESS COVERS TO FINISH GRADE MAX 7 \/ // 16.0" [406 mm] / MIN. PIPE PER //�/ // // / , 12'[3658 mm] \ 30.5" [775 mm] 8" KNOCKOUT (TYPNOCKOUT ENGINEER DESIGN /. /.�/\/\/�/�/.\/�/.�/.�/.�/\/.� \//,\/.�/.�/.\/.�/, /,� / MAX. TYP ) (MAX. INLET= CULTEC N0. 20L POLYETHYLENE SIDE PORTAL TO BE CUT 36" x 12" 24 INCHES) IN FIELD TO ALLOW HVLV 12.0 [305 mm] OPENING LINER TO SPAN THE ENTIRE WIDTH �Yp) /< FC-24 FEED CONNECTOR mm] MIN. A OF THE SYSTEM BELOW THE HVLV ] FC-24 FEED CONNECTORS AND \ \ \ \ \ \ '\ \ \ \'\"\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4'-8" 36' X 24' 4'-5' \y\ \ \ /\/\/\ \ /�\ \/\\/ \/\/\/ \/ /\/ \� /\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\ \ \/ / /\/\ 6.. 3 -0' OPENING SIDE PORTALS �� / /�<!/,�!\//\/(�/e�!/�// /.\//l\/!/� 12.0" [305 mm]TYP. 58.01[1473 mm] 52.0"[1321 mm] CULTEC INTERNAL MANIFOLD DETAIL SECTION VIEW GENERAL NOTES NOTES: RECHARGER 330XL HD BY CULTEC,INC.OF BROOKFIELD,CT. ALL RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY UNITS ARE MARKED STORAGE PROVIDED=11.32 CF/FT PER DESIGN UNIT. WITH A COLOR STRIPE FORMED INTO THE PART ALONG THE 1. CONCRETE: 5,000 PSI MINIMUM AFTER 28 DAYS. REFER TO CULTEC,INC.'S CURRENT RECOMMENDED LENGTH HA THE CHAMBER. ' INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. ALL RECHARGER 330XL HD CHAMBERS MUST BE INSTALLED IN 2. DESIGNED FOR H-20 LOADING. ALSO AVAILABLE IN H-10 LOADING WITH 3" WALL. USE RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY FOR TRAFFIC AND/OR ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL,STATE AND 3. TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT SEALED WITH BUTYL RESIN. H-25 APPLICATIONS. FEDERAL REGULATIONS. SEDIMENT AND OIL SEPARATOR CULTEC RECHARGER 330XL HD HEAVY DUTY TYPICAL CROSS SECTION TOP OF 1 .5:1 - D ETAI L - MAX. SLOPE =2:1 SLOPE CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN (NOT TO SCALE) DATE: ------------------ CITY OF SALEM FLAT STONES PLANNING BOARD f, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO - FOR WALL LIKE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY UNPAVED PAVED ',.= ; ::;. CONFIGURATION THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS PRUNE AS FIELD FINISHED GRADE ------------- ----------- OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY DIRECTED BY OWNER TO DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. - IMPROVE APPEARANCE . . (RETAIN NORMAL TREE EXISTING GROUND ------------------------ SHAIPE) SURFACE 1:5 ---------- --------------- : r CITY CLERK MAX. SLOPE : TRUNK FLARE PAVING AND SUB-BASE MATERIAL JUNCTION. PLANT TREE 2 1-2 ABOVE EXISTING FILTER 1ti J' 1 ----_---_--_ • 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016 COMMON FILL MATERIAL ------------ 0- - FABRIC 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 a GRADE COMMON FILL MATERIAL �\ JOINTS 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 3" [LAYER SHREDDED PINE - ".; PERPENDICULAR ------------------ ---- 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 o - - BARK MULCH TO TO - ` - TO SLOPE - - - - 1 Details - 9/4/2015 - OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER WARNING IrAPE I NO. REVISION DATE ----------------------- KEEP MULCH 2" FROM DETAIL SHEET TRUNK EXISTING GRADE ORIGINAL l MIN. BOULDER GROUND OR _.::;':. ` `. SIZE = 500L8 — CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP ------------------------ ----------- ---------- "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVISION - _ FROM TOP 1/3 OF COMPACTED f SALEM MASSACHUSETTS 3/4" ROOT BALL. IF 12" MINIMUM SEE p. :'I'' 1 1/2" PROPOSED ------------------------ '' ' - -_III—I NON BIODEGRADABLE, B MIN CLEARANCE / GRADE =III—III -- — NOTE 1 BELOW - - CRUSHED .;,.: .. OWNER: REMOVE COMPLETELY. IN SCREENED GRAVELIC o _ - - • BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL =I1II—I I I—III—III— I I I= —I - - SCREENED, GRAVEL PLACED AGAINST - - _ E SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE -- ------------------- WALLACE ROAD I=III=III—III—III=III— —III— SEWER OR DRAIN UNDISTURBED SIDES AND BOTTOM OF BACKFILL AS PER TRENCH. SEE NOTE t LYNN, AC01901 - - - - SPECIFICATION " LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 - 12' MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDIN 8" MIN SCREENED GRAVEL BEDDING " DATE' ------ - 12 MINIMUM ------------- APPLICANT: ^W j & WILLIAMS DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE. \ BELOW OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE. ► Y SPARAGES 0 THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL ROOTBALL. LEDGE UNDISTURBED NSD REALTY TRUST EARTH "•.. 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENGINEERS PLANNERS I SURVEYORS NOTES LYNN, MA 01905 3 189 NORTH MAIN STREET 0 4' PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN 75% of BASE PROJECT LOCUS: 1.. FOR PIPES OTHER THAN PVC, SELECTED COMMON FILL MAY BE USED FROM - - - --- - SEAL - - SUITE 101 TO DISCHARGE TO "DAYLIGHT" AT ROCKS TO BE tHOFMAs CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA - MID-DIAMETER OF PIPE TO 12" ABOVE TOP OF PIPE � - � �- � S - MIDDLETON, MA 01949 a DECIDUOUS TREE INTERVALS NO GREATER THAN 30' 1 000 LBS OR �� gPti o� PETER M. N ASSESSORS REFERENCE: PHONE: (978) 539-8088 PLANTING TRENCH DETAIL FOR LOCATIONS) GREATER S FAX: (978) 539-8200 (SEE PLAN FOR MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 o BLAISDELL,JR. DETAIL GRAVITY PIPE VIL NG.1416130 DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 4 (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) Fois7EP` �'0` SCALE: NOT TO SCALE N RIP - RAP DETAIL (Nor To SCALE) SHEET 9 OF 1 1 �'L/�J fG AUGUST 14, 2015 I J a EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FRAME GRATE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE FRAME & GRATE OR FINISHED GRADE 8,. MANHOLE FRAME AND MORTAR MORTAR COVER AS SPECIFIED BRICKS AND MORTAR —i— --I _= I— _ TO BE USED TO MAKE III—_IIIIII_III—III—III--III—_ I—_III—) 4 MIN. TYP a GRADE ADJUSTMENTS - BRICKS AND MORTAR e . CONCRETE COLLAR MIN. 8 FLAT TOP — '" 4" X 20" OPENING SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE , GRADE ADJTO BE DUSTMENTSTO E WEEPHOLE TO BE 12-INCH COVERS TO BRICK FOR GRADE PRECAST IN RISER SUPPORT AN H-20 LOAD 1 `-' e SECTION • COMMON FILL MATERIAL 6" OVVERR{LAP ADJUSTMENT PRECAST TRANSITION SECT OR BARREL CONICAL SECTION WEEPHOLE TO BE X SECT WITH PRECAST 48" f1" DIAMETER ' PRECAST IN RISER �,� +� D o' TOP SLAB RISER SECTION-- . SECTION vv - - - - - - o RUBBER "0" RING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC iv � GASKET OR PRE- (TYP) 2' e v FORMED FLEXIBLE WATER NORMAL OUTSIDE OF PIPE JOINT SEALANT +2" CLEARANCE RISER SECTION LEVEL .. •. 3/8" TO 3/4.. v WASHED GRAVEL MANHOLE RUNGS o � — CATCH BASIN TRAP o P MULTIPLES OF d N NORMAL OUTSIDE OF PIPE BASE SECTION WATER . 1 ,2,3,4,5 OR 6 FT LEVEL +2" CLEARANCE d o LENGTHS AS REQ'D 4' PERF. CORR. HDPE 3., (HOLES FACING UP) 4'-0" UNLESS OTHERWISE P : / \ INDICATED ON DRAWINGS P . CATCH BASIN TRAP I v a BASE SECTION - UNDISTURBED EARTH — - o 12"MINIMUM q1V FOUNDATION _ . SCREENED GRAVEL UNDERDRAIN - - - - — - - - UNDISTURBED EARTH DETAIL o v > o e v (NOT TO SCALE) o 12" MINIMUM SCREENED GRAVEL PRECAST DOUBLE— GRATE CATCH BASIN o 0 12°MINIMUM SCREENED GRAVEL DETAIL UNDISTURBED EARTH THICKNESS OF BOTTOM SLAB 3 MINIMUM CONCRETE FILL (NOT TO SCALE) SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN DOUBLE GRATE THE MANHOLE BARREL PRECAST CATCH BASIN SECTION WALL OR TOP SLAB 4'-0" WIDE WHICHEVER IS GREATER UNDISTURBED EARTH DETAIL MULCHED TRAIL FRAME (NOT TO SCALE) SINGLE GRATE rEXISTING GRADE PRECAST DRAIN MANHOLE _ LIFTING STRAPS UNDISTURBED DETAIL GRATE EARTH (NOT TO SCALE) TRAIL DETAIL ' CITY OF SALEM (NOT TO SCALE) _,.DANDY sacK° PLANNING BOARD INSTALLED BETWEEN . THE GRATE AND FRAME ----- I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED -------- WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN ------------------------ PREPARING THIS PLAN. PLAN � SECTION CLERKS CERTIFICATION ON THE PLAN ------------------ WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC A—A DATE: GRATE LIFTING STRAP 6' 0., ------------------ SECTION ------------------------ FRAME CATCH BASIN GRATE I, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DO A-A PLACED ABOVE THE. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY . 6' 0.. LOWER STRAPS AND 2'-0" 2' 0" 2'-0" THE PLANNING BOARD HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND RECORDED AT THIS BELOW THE LFTING ------------------------ OFFICE AND THAT NO APPEAL WAS RECEIVED DURING THE TWENTY 4• 0^ STRAPS. DAYS NEXT AFTER SUCH RECEIPT AND RECORDING OF SAID NOTICE. 4 LOWER STRAP ------------------------ - --------------- 4„ ----------- --------- CITY CLERK "DANDY SACK" OPEN THROAT GRANITE SEDIMEMIT TRAP OR ------------------------ CURB INLET SECTION OPEN THROAT GRANITE EQUAL CURB INLET SECTION ELEVATION ------------------------ ' CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP DATE: ------------------ PRECAST CATCH DETAIL PRECAST BASIN CATCH Notes: (NOT TO SCALE) SECTION A-A BASIN 1) To be placed in the existing catch basins located in Clarke Avenue prior to the start of construction. M OPEN THROAT GRANITE SECTION 2) To be placed in the proposed catch basins as shown immediately after installation to 'prevent sediment " 5 No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016 i CURB INLET SECTION A-A from reaching the stormwater mono emient areas. PLAN 9 9 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 1 PLAN 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 3 FLANGE CATCH BASIN FRAME 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 AND CASCADE GRATE LEBARON 1 Details 9/4/2015 4„ LK1200 OR APPOROVED EQUAL OPEN THROAT GRANITE h 18„ �® LOW POINTS USE LF248-2) NO. REVISION DATE CURB INLET SECTION v CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATE SHALL BE MODEL DETAIL SHEET T a BRICKS AND MORTAR 44" LV-2448-2 FRAME WITH LK1200 GRATES ON SLOPES P44TO BE USED TO MAKE 1 AND LF248-2 GRATES @ LOW POINTS BY LEBARON "TH V OO DS" S ION • GRADE ADJUSTMENTS 4,FRAME & GRATE FOUNDRY, INC. OF BROCKTON, MA OR EQUAL.24" BRICKS AND MORTAR E /� DLAN UBDIVS 18„ SET AT BINDER COURSE AND RESET AT t 1" SALEM MASSACHUSETTS TO BE USED TO MAKE •. BELOW FINISH PAVEMENT) GRADE ADJUSTMENTS OWNER: BRICKS AND MORTAR BARBARA DRISCOLL ET AL 48 t1 DIAMETER ` TO BE USED TO MAKE 18 WALLACE ROAD1" DIAMETER N 48" t1" DIAMETER GRADE ADJUSTMENTS FRAME & GRATE I- 22' I LYNN, MA 01901 PRECAST PRECAST BRICKS AND MORTAR LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 WILLIAMS �TTT T T A r CATCH BASIN PRECAST To BE USED TO MAKE PRECAST p VV ILLIAMS APPLICANT: r V ' C� SPARAGES ' CATCH BASIN GRADE ADJUSTMENTS CATCH BASIN i y CATCH BASIN NSD REALTY TRUST 48" t1" DIAMETER 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENCWEERS . PLANNERS I SURVEYORS ELEVATION LYNN, MA 01905 SECTION 189 NORTH MAIN STREET A=A ELEVATION SECTION SEAL �tHOFM19 PROJECT LOCUS: SUITE 101 A=Asycy CLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDDLETON, MA 01949 PETER M. N ASSESSORS REFERENCE: PHONE: (978) 539-8088 GRANITE CURB INLET DOUBLE- GRATE CB GRANITE CURB INLET BLAISDEIL,JR. a CIVIL y MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 DETAIL No.41613 D DETAIL Q 9Fa STEP�O �Q SCALE: NOT TO SCALE DETAIL SHEET 3 OF 4 (NOT TO SCALE) �} (NOT TO SCALE) s LENo j SINGLE GRATE DOUBLE GRATE - (�a ! �� AUGUST 14, 2015 SHEET 10 OF 1 1 n DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS - DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS - - - - - BRICKS AND MORTAR RIMS=142.50 - P - BRICKS AND MORTAR - RIMS=132.83 : _ - - DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS - - SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE BRICKS AND MORTAR RIMS=118.83 - SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE - BRICKS AND MORTAR ' RIMS=122.83 TO BE UADJUSTMEN 6-INCH FLAT TOP ' TO BE USED TO MAKE 6-INCH FLAT TOP TO BE USED TO MAKE -TO BE USED TO MAKE . SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE :. GRADE A - - GRADE ADJUSTMENTS GRADE ADJUSTMENTS } ' 6-INCH FLAT TOP 6-INCH FLAT TOP . l COVERS TO SUPPORT AN COVERS TO SUPPORT AN - COVERS TO RT AN ADE ADJUSTMENTS o . _ P . . . . o. 4 .. H-20 LOAD P o z P " COVERS TO SUPPORT AN • H-20 LOAD 4. � c. ' H-20 LOAD SUPPO _ GR _ o otom.' —H-20 LOADSET TOP OF BAFFLE AT SET TOP OF BAFFLE AT ELEV.=135.50 - d ELEV.=131.20 - - - - ELEVTOP 0358AFFLE AT SET TOP OF BAFFLE AT4' - o ELEV.=121.30 SET 2'L WEIR ® 100YRPERF. 100 YR STORM 100 YR STORM -10 0 134.5 PVC - - - STORM ELEV.=135.34 � ' � _ ® �• SET WEIR ® 1 8" 120 50 2 L OOYR8" 0 134.00 o TEE o d o STORM ELEV.=121.06 E z 18" HDPE 18" HDPE E o - - - - INLET PIPE - - - - - INLET PIPE 18" HDPE75 o - _ 11�_ INV=128.50 �,_ _-� PE INV=115.50INVE118!00—� S=LEVELL s _ S=LEVEL I _ 1=LEVEL_ 2.5" ® 128.5 - _ - 8" ®115.5 - - - 6. 0 118.0PRE-CAST CONCRETE PRE-CAST CONCRETE INFILTRATION BASIN - —PANEL WITH ORIFICE . INFILTRATION BASIN 2 TRAP ROCK -PANEL WITH ORIFICE. INFILTRATION BASIN 3 TRAP ROCK - - PRE-CAST CONCRETE INFILTRATION BASIN 4 TRAP ROCK PRE-CAST CONCRETE PANEL W1TH ORIFICE —PANEL WITH ORIFICE 72 ±1 - - - - 72• ±1" - D AMETEK DIAMETER DIAMETER - DIAMETER - ' 12" HDPE ' ' - - 12' HDPE 12" HDPE � - - � � 12" HDPE - - - - OUTLET PIPE - - - - —� OUTLET PIPE - —� OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE - INV=131.50 - - INV=127.50 INV-113.50 - INV=114.50 - OUTSIDE OF PIPE - °O ° OUTSIDE OF PIPE - : - °° o OUTSIDE OF PIPE - . - ° °O o OUTSIDE OF PIPE +2" CLEARANCE +2" CLEARANCEMfg* +2" CLEARANCE +2" CLEARANCE - - ' 12°MINIMUM _ - - 12'MINIMUM 12"MINIMUM � 12'MINIMUM - _ - SCREENED GRAVEL _ - - - SCREENED GRAVEL — : - - - SCREENED GRAVEL . - - '` - - SCREENED RAVE -' INV UNDISTURBED EARTH - - UNDISTURBED EARTH - - -. UNDISTURBED EARTH - E GRAVEL UNDISTURBED EARTH - SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION - (2) DRAIN - (2) DRAIN _ _ - _ - � (2) DRAIN � � � - - (2) DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS - : - MANHOLE COVERS - - MANHOLE COVERS - - ` MANHOLE COVERS - / _ INLET. OUTLET - INLET I (OUTLET INLET I OUTLET � INLET I - OUTLET - - PIPE I D R A I N ( ( D R A I N PIPE - —� PIPE I D R A I N ( ( D R A I N PIPE - - —�' PIPE I 0 R A I N I D R A I N PIPE _ - : PIPE . I D R A I N ( ( D R A I N PIPE - \ PRECAST CATCH BASIN - - - \ L / PRECAST CATCH BASIN - - - \ / PRECAST CATCH BASIN - _ - - - ` PRECAST CATCH BASIN PLAN PLAN PLAN : : PLAN : OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE INFILTRATION BASIN 1 INFILTRATION BASIN 2 _ INFILTRATION BASIN 3 INFILTRATION BASIN 4 (NOT 'TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) : - (NOT TO SCALE) -. (NOT TO SCALE) CITY OF SALEM DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL Post Top Luminaire PLANNING BOARD D ETAI L (NOT TO SCALE) : DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL ----------------------- MOTES_; BIT. SIDEWALK USABLE SIDEWALK 'WIDTH PER AAB IS NOT TO BE I.. (defer to STD CS G109 for Material list. ------------------------ GRAVEL LESS THAN 4'-0" - _ 2, C-I-C to be installed inside the 3" PVC conduit ROADWAY and cut off at the top of the concrete base as - LOAM & SEED NOTE: W 1 shown. C-1-C ends shall be cut with care to ------------------------ * //�� DETECTABLE WARNING PANELS ARE REQUIRED avoid damage t0 their factory installed conductors " + + * inside, and to allow sufficient length to roperly ------------------------ ��/ ON ALL PROPOSED WHEELCHAIR RAMPS TO BE gg pp INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION connect to fixture leads at the dole ttandhale located 18" above the precast base, or inside a secondary ��/ STANDARD M/E 107.6.5R (DECEMBER 2004) TYPICAL INSTALLATION handhole or transformer foundation. 3/8" DIA. HOLE 1/2" 5 DEEP AT ACTUAL POINT OF SURVEY PANELS MAY BE CONCRETE PRECAST OR Q ® " ® ----------------------- REFERENCE �� CAST IN PLACE OR OTHER SUITABLE 1.6"-2.4" C? 4 MATERIAL PERMANENTLY APPLIED TO THE � � - �// RAMP. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES �� / SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJACENT �- 150% TO 60% 0.2" ORLKING DARK SURFACES ONE LICGHT EITHER LIGHT-ON-DARK. A ML�J A I 0.65 N OF BASE DIA. ------------------------ 16 ----------------------- ��/ SECTION A-A le Base Po DATE: ------------------- LAYOUT �� / Securing Nuts , LINE %/// \�� And Washers Handhote Anchor Bolt Shroud e Pole Base Leveling NUis S No changes to this sheet 1/29/2016 a - - 4 Planning Board comments 1/22/2016 00 aVARIABLE VARIABLE h 1 And Washers 1 '— 3 Peer review comments 12/07/2015 GRANITE BOUND SIDEWALK 7V-5%*I X VA ^/ 2 No changes to this sheet 11/10/2015 00 DETAIL Details 9/4/2015 n h Fin, Grade N0. REVISION DATE (NOT TO SCALE) "LEVEL LANDING" DETAIL S H EET ��c 25 Warning Tape TOWARD STREET FOR "THE WOODLANDS" SUBDIVSION fZ GRASS PLOT Z_ 1 .5%* CROSS SLOPE qhs I11II III �Y E IllUlll N MEET PROPOSED RAMP �° DRAINAGE c IIIIIIII GRADE AT END OF CURB ^/ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS -'Z_ �� i l l 11 (I I � 2 D.D. Cable-lin-Conduit-Note 2 of 00000000000Qo0o GRASS PLOT �_ N � I I fI f ! �C OWNER: 0 0 0 0 0 _ J�IJII�` _ - Washed, Screened Sand BARBARA DRISCOLL. ET AL E /V EDGE OF ROADWAY --'`x - - - ' Jam/ -- - �` 4" Above And Below 18 WALLACE ROAD GRANITE CURB M ^ ^ Cable-In COnduii LYNN, MA 01901 LC CERTS 36055,36056,36057 WILLIAMS 6" REVEAL .I " %r a 6" REVEAL AT END I v 3 PVC i1 APPLICANT: o I is Clean Fill & SPARA.GES N PLAN CEMENT CONCRETE I RAMP NSD REALTY TRUST 5 -0" MIN: I REFERENCE 24" "LEVEL LANDING" WITH 76 OAKVILLE STREET ENGINEERS PLANNERS , SURVEYORS POINT DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL LYNN, MA 01905 1.5% * SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT LOCUS: 189 NORTH MAIN STREET SErftA f M SUITE 101 i I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFORMED Undisturbed Solid Earth SsgcCLARK AVENUE SALEM, MA MIDDLETON, MA 01949 WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS R M. � ASSESSORS REFERENCE: SPHONE: (978) 539-8088 OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS IN WHEELCHAIR RAMP (WCR) ELL,JR. n1 MAP 6 PARELS 7, 8 & 9 FAX: (978) 539-8200 a' PREPARING THIS PLAN. 5o a41111 a DETAIL LIGHT POLE DETAIL No.41613 DETAIL SHEET 4 of 4 v (NOT TO SCALE) NOTES: (NOT TO SCALE) 9F SCALE: NOT TO SCALE ------------------- - * CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE f0.5% WILLIAMS & SPARAGES LLC SHEET 11 OF 1 w If I G AUGUST 14, 2015 J