Loading...
81 82 85 86 BARNES CIRCLE & CLARK STREET - ZBA Barnes Circle/Clark St. Lots 81 , 82, 85, 86 R-1 \� Robert Stillian / \ t � ' M r „y (f itV of �alem, 411HU9Stttlj usetts Del 11 ()2 PN '88 C E71.If� Pnara of Ap}rettl a+ir cL€RIL I A. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT J. STILIAN FOR VARIANCES AT LOTS 81 , 82, 85,86 BARNES CIRCLE/CLARK ST. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held September 14, 1988 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Luzinski, Nutting and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from lot size and frontage to allow property to be divided into five (5) lots. The property is located in an R-1 district. Street addresses, according to the Assessor, is as follows: Lot 81 : 13 Clark Street; Lot 82: 26 Barnes Circle; Lot 85: 34 Barnes Circle and Lot 86: 30 Barnes Circle. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or stucture involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was substantial neighborhood opposition; 2. There was concern relative to blasting and drainage; 3. Petitioner failed to meet his burdon of proof relative to hardship. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT J. STILIAN FOR VARIANCES AT LOTS 81 , 82, 85, 86 BARNES CIRCLE/CLARK STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against the granting of the requested Variances. DENIED , 2 Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK 'R,XI TPI OEf:J7. I' '"'y S"A;L Er i;'7` PUPSI,ANT TO SECTIO�j 17 OF THE MP S I. T!C ,,r. ,.,,_ . .. � ., 'IT IIN id, F ". d Ec:E. R;'I. 6. i ULL_ - is .., __ ln_ Of IkL;:RD OR IS RtCuRDE: AND NOTED 01, TnE 0i,NERS CERilhh-n7E Of ill LE BOARD OF APPEAL Inv. c 0 \ \ 6 8 69 _ o 1 's, 168.13 9 J O Q u' f,l-/S r c+ryr m r6T 63 u) ,sS o5e�0,\ to w Q v 6a 1 s \67-55 P4 Ve 0 Qt°Q 0\o \ILI m 1p / \ Ir6?53 1' ��ro 166.93 P \660 W 62 to I �_�,—O POSED 645 Pro - A0 g \ O \6s _ Bq RNE P W `V 1 6L \6 y0 S 4 \65 "-- --__ _ Lei ro I `u \ A _ N 14a P 0? o ��� \.93� PgVEMEN ProPos q \ 1O v 1p0. 00 \67 6 T. . .. .7 EX 1 S �__ 55 Rrm,(161 6)M R \g7� \ 5 ,Z ^ 05 o I 4 \63 T. -y.62. (1555) \ \5 O 142 c� a 16�\\T 0. r jAi 7 '"'.P.gyV _ + 6 \� 2 \ F� _ 1 ro \67\ � S 63° 3 E p" -�C � RG` A si g2 h 140 8 o LE O \6g3 ,� \ J \639 3j„E ! 16237 b� ti AaseC -- ---- `53 \a b \ Inv=(162.6 I 100 00 619 r' � 5\ s &11 9 e3 \,,6 138 11 S: "-----, m (V 5 Qp a ago 5 Basement I \66 \ e1nenr ° (Is Y 4.Of i / 6A5 7 7_ I I i 2 ? ? 2 h ,,�\\0O 61 �� \66Propose,,8 r _ \ \63 I� 0. to c \q6 �, 5 ---\A2 .� 5� �" 136 1(/. T• \66 0 16 VFound,lion I W n I _ 1 Inv = (156p) \Y0 \ 16 \ 154.$q M co / o 1 Basement \�$ A s 133 N h / I • / n 1 _ (1$j 5) / 3 \A9� 6 96 \6A `` i\3N301*0 N 0/ / ProPosedl Foundation nr\j Li Z o Ni 1 C" — A - w O ` �j \q5\ \�1 �68 133 34 u A.o/>dlell o / 159 3 158 4 1 ` ` - c0 (� I ` _ / y J COrV = � 5 _ v 2 m \ N 1576 ; S. F \60 '7 2 v I — _. ' N . 0 A \5 yLrp;7lrc� u) \5A.3 o v \5A \59 g to N O /r`A4 \g39ec ,1 a°`°c ��� �(0 0 9' 71 S z � q69 9, 95a �� 0o Se\A\ 5Q ? 155.3 Go S.F \ ea 6 ; \ 1 8 \5 1 � \60 154 2 \g4 6 51 \55 156 53 \55 3 6 150 12 47 /6�v , 154 A 15Z 51 .6 152 \53 101.68 101. 68 107. 54 f3 ' \ / 0\ 74° O5' 31 E 50.00 IOOi00 - S 6 � yo . ap 150 \5 \A9 � 4 A6 Old Found 1 \ \ojs \q6 \36 148 ` 4 , 9 n� °S y 146 �� A� 5 \A9 6 484 1 \q3. 5 \40 V . 10, 000 S. F. e 1 \A3 5 ti 134 144 5,000 S. F. _ — _ _ — w w _ (140) _ w 138 0� _ _ _ �__ _ _ _ __ _ `�yo _ ALEM PLANNING BOARD N 0 / — 00 N— _ -J ._ `. _ =4 -- �\ \\O N 1,36 G 2�6—�t4Z _ i — —_ \ O o j35 8 — — \jg"\— — 16 1 \\ In o 134 140 � !/ / - - - - - - -1� n 1 ' I I1 In nV z I I I z , 1. — f'�C� 138 / / I Basement=(123.5) 1 1 Basement = (123"0) Z 132 J 136 A,A � I Proposedl�' Foundation I 131 1 % DATE I Proposed Founa 1326_Stone Bpt. W� 13101 I 30 130 5 134 I \3\10 3 I 2977_ 1300I 129.,3 i F+ \30 i Inv.= (121 5) 132 - - — J - - - - J . 16 • 128 NOTES Inv =022 0)0 ' V1. 1 _ 26 _ Elevations are on the Salem City Base. 130 io ny co h 1\ 4 co G —. 225 1241 126 Existing Contours are solid Imes. 128 �` 9 50.00 v o� 23 Q 100.!00 _- \24.1 124 Oa Proposed Contours are dashed lines. 126 / ��0� 12415 S 74° 05' 31 E ��? 0 Proposed elevations are In parentheses. 9 c 12 4 6 I \25 \c 12343 _-2 IPG. 3 Exist 10" 5 Zoning R - I a c I Set Back Requirements IF EXIST.I I S Exist 8" W w lle� w Exist e" W N. 1✓^h �ti ` Front - 15 O SW �'L � 9� Exist 8 \2-dy- "IDRim= 123.15 PAVE. Side - 10.1 Q>� I2' s CLARK `ti Inv = 11700 12240 Rear - 30 \2 M.H. 22. 37 122.47 S . 124"05 R .H 124 29 123 11 122 92 122 49 12375 Inv = 11609 PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN SALE M, MA . FOR ROBERT STILIAN 60 CHILDS ST. LYNN, MA . T = SCALE : I = 20 JULY 1987 LANDMARK ENGINEERING & F -- ----+�- -- — - —ti -____-- 1 — SURVEYING, INC. 0 10 20 40 60 80 LYNN, MA . ( SHEET I OF 2)