5 STODER PLACE - ZBA 5 Stodder Place R-2
Kathleen McSweeney
I
iI,
1�
---7
c(
Ctu of �ttlem, CTttssadlusetts
Bnttra of upeal
�e 8 3 z o fri iv
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENEY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 5 STUDER PLACE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from rear & side
setbacks and distance from structure to allow existing pool, deck and shed
in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. Three abutters signed a petition in favor of this request.
2. The direct abutter, Helen Malia, wrote a letter in favor after the deck
was moved.
3. The deck, as relocated, is the only feasible location for the deck.
The shed as it stands is the only feasible location for it to be placed and
it satisfies the neighbors and abutters.
4. The granting of this variance allows petitioner a fuller use of her
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 5 STUDER PLACE, SALEM
page two pp
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on 4 wid2nb@ &jd5gnted
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as fo011-gws
C. SS
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subjece:�Ooperty
but not the district in general .
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
Step en O'Grady, Mimber
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
of "7§tt1em, 'Tassadjusetts
�3ottrd of �, peal
FEB a 3 i o Pri
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENEY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 5 STODDER PLACE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from rear & side
setbacks and distance from structure to allow existing pool, deck and shed
in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. Three abutters signed a petition in favor of this request.
2. The direct abutter, Helen Malia, wrote a letter in favor after the deck
was moved.
3. The deck, as relocated, is the only feasible location for the deck.
The shed as it stands is the only feasible location for it to be placed and
it satisfies the neighbors and abutters.
4. The granting of this variance allows petitioner a fuller use of her
property.
1
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 5 STUDER PLACE, SALEM
page two Fla p
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on 4- VviaRtd *d5gnted
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as fo0l,tzws:
r .ss
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subjects property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
Step e�'Grady, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(fits of $Ulem, 'Tassadlusetts
M
a s 19nttrd Of �, peal
FEB 8 3 A
G,r,
SS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENEY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 5 STODDER PLACE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from rear & side
setbacks and distance from structure to allow existing pool, deck and shed
in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. Three abutters signed a petition in favor of this request.
2. The direct abutter, Helen Malia, wrote a letter in favor after the deck
was moved.
3. The deck, as relocated, is the only feasible location for the deck.
The shed as it stands is the only feasible location for it to be placed and
it satisfies the neighbors and abutters.
4. The granting of this variance allows petitioner a fuller use of her
property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 5 STODDER PLACE, SALEM
page two pp
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on 4 L and *dJgnted
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as fo�lgws:
S-
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the �subjecr �property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations .
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
Step en O'Grady, M mber
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
I �
.t
°� fl�itg ofttlem, � uSStttlluSettS
3 s 3Boura of �Tyt ems!
FEB 6 3 10 Htj 'yy
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENEY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 5 STODDER PLACE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from rear & side
setbacks and distance from structure to allow existing pool, deck and shed
in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. Three abutters signed a petition in favor of this request.
2. The direct abutter, Helen Malia, wrote a letter in favor after the deck
was moved.
3. The deck, as relocated, is the only feasible location for the deck.
The shed as it stands is the only feasible location for it to be placed and
it satisfies the neighbors and abutters.
4. The granting of this variance allows petitioner a fuller use of her
property.
1
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 5 STODDER PLACE, SALEM
page two Fla p
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on 'ttt2 �vicara &d3gnted
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as foOld�gws:.
C
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subjects %property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
Step eh n O'Grady, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(Gitu of -`� ttlem, Ansizadjusetts
Hard of ,}real
Q
February 15, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF FEBRUARY 08, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF KATHLEEN MCSWEENEY FOR A VARIANCES TO ALLOW
EXISTING POOL, DECK AND SHED TO REMAIN AS SHOWN ON PLAN SUBMITTED TO
THE BOARD OF APPEAL ON JANUARY 19, 1994 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5
STODDER PLACE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
-ATE OF FEAR NG /
PETITIONER e
i p
LOCATION V-o�
1
CTION: TO GRANT O SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT/ DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
STEPHEN O'GRADY ✓/
GEORGE A. AHMED V/
FRANCIS GREALISH
ALERT C. HILL L�
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE A EMBERS
NI V. C%ENRTCOUE
CONDITIONS:
� ��; / �'�--3
__-
------�-e----X-��- � ----- --- - - r-�°i._�-a�Du�Le ��_ --
�a-�D
---__.._--._.-�a—�a-�`_-- -- _ .. --._._- ._ -- _ _ - ---2,Cre� ---._ ..
__
--- -
__-- - - - __ `3 _-�� �
- - _- -
- ---- - -- _ -3J .���` �- C ---- --_
I
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
a.�
M,
IIfMlPItT, II83FIL4LiSPtS
's 'Puarb of Cfkp}tral
!Q 12i(
TO THE BOARD OF APPEA4 :4S.JVED
The Unde i rgpr�sl�nt0` atEF 01Ajs. are the owners of a certain parcel of land lo tech
R1.
C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . � .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
n c�
m
�m
cn w Co
r
o m .c
T
T- �
c: T
mn
W ,csi
The Application for Permi-t was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
SU c�vt (CC..����✓✓✓��� ✓�r-""0�'1' `11.2o�J.. � �LLCU� Cl�:��'��'JJ c.,_e�u�
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Owner. .( �t�ql�l�d1--.//. .nnnn. . . . . . . . . .
Address.' -A��APq !/l . lit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. .. . . . . t �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner.6.b14.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PEI(TION 10 BOARD 017 APPEALS
LOCATION
........... ............111.1.................
PF I I I IONFR..................1111............_......
ADDRESS....................... ... ...................
..................... .......................
CONDII IONS
............ ............ .-........I.......................
................... ... . ........... ........ ................
..................................... .............
................... .............................................
.................................................................
......................... .............-........................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED................... 0
................................................... 19.........
I
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST , BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION ; �ACt�i ^� MA S. (-as'Ie `1.... SAY.!^ .?... n �..............................
...................................... .. ....... To ................
SCALE I" - 30 FT. DAZE . is J (y ly6S• I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the
REFERENCE : ........« ..6i;33-• ,i j•, 70 building (s) shown on this plan are located on the ground or
.�:(.. cds shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the
9(-
-. J. v_ _ _.._.a_ � ...... ... when constructed.
`�-
NOTE ; This Is a Mortgage Inspection survey and-not The building(s) are not located In the special flood hazard
an ihstrument survey, therefore this plot plan is for zone , as defined by H.U.D.
mortgage inspection purposes only, Okz. ���—
..
lie n. /j C>w IYV NJ(3
o tL shea'
n ! wAZRerJ
N h Pool
�-
2 crdrtr u . o t0 NEYc-0r n
w
n WHEN['VER AN 011 SET IS
(�
J'4 OR 11"S AN INSTR. S[IRVly IS
R(COMMCNDED 10 DEHRJAINI.
PROP I-INES,
V
Y
I.INF`, , , ; SLIRVc )I IYI ,; f 17 ;I
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
dJCd.
BUILDINGfta of *Irm, Alssar4us>etts
124t 1 - �Raarb of � ettl
TO THE BOARD OF LRT1
A[HrEIVE0
�i GF SAL E#1 prAS>
The Under i �m�� p�esen$� at he s are the owners of a certain parcel of land to t
at NO. . .�`� !1 . .Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. —
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
rno N
x
N T> CD
r
C,
.'i LO
n X
ma
The Applica 'on for Permit was den'e by the of Buildings for the following
reasons:
r" V 04914 ` tea
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
VGL2,� ;;�1DYYL /1PQii.� � Y C��t�y,2'P ,K�jldlm
Owner. . kC 'rn.vP!. . . .
Address. J.. . ,�/ / A.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone.
. )Y :4.. . .(... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . kau rl� . .f? Sa l .. . . . . . . . . . .
Three conies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
�
NO........... ........................
PET\TION T0BOARD oFAPPEALS
[0[&T}0N
'
.............. ...................... -- ..................
PEI|T/Om[K..........................................
&DDKESS ......... ................ .................. �
~
-----------'--^'
C0ND|T|0NS
--^---~^-' ------------
-------- ------------- �
..................,�����..... ......................
�
-`,------------------- ^
'
.......... --.................... ..........................
................................................................ '
�
y2T[TION APPROVED....................
��
D2N\E0--------. �~1 �
u
^
................................................... /Y.........
r^
�
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST , BEVERLY, MAI
LOCATION : S f! Ems( ..MASS.
..................... ......... ..V....... To ........,.......`.I........n.y.l:'1�.h...... :^................... .
SCALE , I = 30 FT. DAME : ,�.$• ���� 1965, I hereby certify that I have examined..".the premises and...that. ..the
REFERENCE : ........ ...(3 6 r33 f? 7p building (s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
.. .. ........ ....... ..
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the
........................ . C_.f. --"-9'----.`S-` -LT to--- ---- when constructed.
NOTE : This Is a Mortgage Inspection survey an�not The building(s) are not located in the special flood hazard
an instrument survey , therefore this plot plan Is for zone, as defined by H.U.D.
mortgage Inspection purposes only. p(�
,� nI� UWIr.,NISl.L
43. 42I
ro d.
N 'U
• 27 t'f..'� 1 n �•{ SM IT 11 '�
7 SIMMY u. z 10 MoNt'Yccx•�x7
• b
a
r (� S1:3cey
n WHENEVER i;:" Oft SET IS
1'.t.OR LESS AN INSTR. SURVEY IS
RECOMMENDED TO DEIERIV INE
f ROP, LINES.
L3U';!i': THIS Stm,, Y IQ. i y,
SURVEY
I.INC`,
-----
qe 6,9 � v 1 0on00 �J ?9.1n
O �a C Q •
O ,�• a �' � �• J s`9O
/ ee •� i � ���� aa�� Off` .j.a 6)
W�� F 41
my 5 _ ' - ` ` �OJ1a qai. yq �3 0o F
pq/�`l�
ow
2Sjyo t� ` " /\ os�9 Ss _
a
� � O •O a�� Vl \ o
Ph
2 'o E ee me a• aJ ^�
ot, yep a,?6� o c 2� �F ►e a� �'� �On
X tm
F
p
4
e q
e �
� _Ati _ .� N� � -`°?9 - OS'- - '<� ... .�'•90� ., nog/ m e y Jit
BOARD OF ASSESSORS 0
CITY HALL PAGE:
-9 7 7� To
N*
�,7
MA —0 4o 'o ,
T
CCER1
3 •
3 L I S'lo,
eat=at <•a sea "o
"V,o o �t
4 �L o o �o U
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP- 27 LOT: 0243 SUFE:
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0005 STODDER PLACE
7 o'o 'r777
�'A -SE "77 — 9
—S USSE'EMORKERT7.77, 71TCSWEEN
a;aaeA �o ol,� A,"
EE,
6�v io
as sa:aae ��oo "o, 'o o'"v �o o�
f"ATHE
V
o' oo, o o 9, mai
o >ffia3 aa._
s.-.4 «as 3a
9 'e,wo Vo �W ee,�
o o 4
4oOR�v .ag 121
,o MSP L`OT SVFF OROPPR I T 3
14 0
27 0243 0005 STODDER PLACE MCSWEENEY 'TIMOTHY G 5 STODDER PL I
12 MLEEN —SAL.EN—MA-0.lQ7n 16
,,,�,"/�,,U "11 7� 77r
xY
w
'S o%�,A o 777 7
�-,S �'bb E, R:"P L,A"( `oROBEAT "08,
o STTO 1)1)rG R,,,,, Pp
V�, o,� o t *'S
�27 ' 000 �A
13
T A,
...........
tkRENEWs o*4 o
14:
"0
X 0 X ol 1, o*
is
16 3 STODDER LM RJ�5=ANN SALEM MA 01970
21
17
— 27 0245 0001 STODDER PLACE LITTLE MICHAEL 0 1 STODDER PLACE
MARY,
o,Q,
9 A o
ST, o
024 7,, ol xr Tai,:.
IWOAt ' � , �*uU - -,
o"'," Vg",
l'o
0
X K o g o 5� o o e o, 4o io"x o o'o o 5 f,,)I R I E
��� �,,�"� p '*�;"o t �•o P,
�oo�o o o%o, o o o r, o"o- o4 o,K o%�,gm;P, �S.o,Wo o
:I o,�xio I t
I o - o,,W� ix 4 *o, o'o
LWO R D &Al
2 FlGUEREDO J C & FIGUEIREDO D C TRS DANVERS MA 01923
-3 27 0242 0035 UPHAM STREET REAR MCSWEENEY TIMOTHY G 5 STODDER PL.
4 1 -
- —KA.THLEEN ......u PIA n-ic?7n
I -
"ro ,o� @,, e$ y'a aa'3 affi ax -a ffa�§:ffi 9
5 �0 o o o 'OUSEvNoM'I'
'0033o�MPHAM NEE-�,TRUS,.loio`,,,�.�l MONf,`ST�o,�,00, -5
,�TREET� �4,,v,�4 �o, ,FI'RST-oH I sa�
baa: A
?�7 02�
X,4 4 'o o o aA �%4*oovl, f,,sAffi --v,
W"�
h1A '01 c
— o o 7NT o T A I- il R S �o v oo
.39 6:o A, o,�, 'o COTR�A 'CE �*,V k*o oo o�,e
6 1 6, E *4zVo%'oBSVERLY;,'
%LS1 E
�fA Wp 4T, —o
7.L o' o A�%, o, I o 4"
0263-aLa JEEIAM -RE 2f
a HELEN T SALEM MA 01970
• 9
27 0266 0037 UPHAM STREET RILEY GLADYS M 37 OAK AVE
o w ,�az,ii
'%o
-,j',�EUF-PATR'lCIA,o
.......... o
to o, o iv o vs o i Tc�l ANT) P-1)t
92-9"U Rl-'lA='S-T-RE-.'F"M2 RE.A WL' o Fs 6EUF�DOUGh AS'2 p�,@/�yj T
4 LESOEUF KRISTINE SALEM MA 01970
5 27 0260 0029 UPHAM STREET APTAKER SUSAN 29 UPHAM ST
6 BROWN—ELLEN-0 . .....
I A 7,1777
7 lo 4 o o,�,o ¢ffis 't£a3a me
V
4
o v'e'a,
'o
eN
-,vo
I o oq P,,,�oo'o,"o 4 4
o,�o"o,��4Z A.kv, �o
9" o %,"qo
o "o]o
ol,'t
0
2
3 "
"'so a, 'p
s2,3 zaffi zea :¢ a
"lo,"o o �o 14,
44 g,
✓ Z.
V-�ot o' o,ox aaa &
45 ro
o'a't, o� o�
o oo� F'o 0",a�,,o P,o
46
61
;7
48
9
auF33aaa as 'a o to
eome 4 'o
;�o o
"'X a%�'," 4, o,
0 o' o w
Ao o
0,
o o
sa o,� o
sea, >"o
�,,�114�looll
0
2 3
4
5
6
7
3
4
3
"o C.,'ROW ffiaa
�*CHTEF� ASSE S
co A"o,
o 7
o
o e `Pi 0 ��p 1
065
A91 i 69,5 /
O W.
ra
tk b°° G
0Ap
C e 9 6%60 A-(0100
\N66 •A 6 e9
Gia °�
nj.600 \0 60 b •� O sob
I 4f 5p 4i
SCHOO 00 T6%
ro
e `ry60\ i s b �6\y ��ck
,ytk
o eA�Q VBA0 O dI► d ��5 �� p
1\ti29y p e '�J g° 3 �rpBAO \0° V,10 0 \y3
IF 0
!i9.,°° `OJP�• °1 r 2577 J y AS��\6 y�10 0//�� •e
AO
\ Ap0 10 `ryo`'` s �p � �F,o JJ '► ,o -p�,� q1 ,�`1 �a e
(y0 p� �0
+ J3 9� afp lLaSg" �(q A\0 '�, 6� • o-e O e° v�v 0
p O+J J' Ay5 9y5A � tiA°
v,
6�61y bA AO ,• 3651 ppb
'l'lsu a9'Lyb
5 +B` AZ Abs • e e 0
00 OU
Bp ,�� J -o' �y Op
2 3y �ti
50 for
'��AA ,10�\AJ J'B � 2A50 y �pry���l •go 605° n
1 d L Jfoo V�10 V. , T,s ,
\0 1, •�X05 u, �'��, �9\ fib`° 96 p� sx .z\b
°10 ', a.p,
�B V
ah p0 9 a 6�1 'L�6 5 CK l 0 bs ti0 A 0 •
$b 5\ r0 gv �p d• ! • s 5 %0
6�G p
`a'
�o eb y�°
0 a69 O • 8SA fi,09 0,g9
4b ti �Oa 61\ 6h61 a 'WSJ 6 rL61 \V' �g�Ar'�<
a 6 ,a 6`Z row\e° 33�\
h o3 \Y
•^ 012B e�
01
•• � e��\• 2�1 yq5 ,�
01
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
FSCALE ,
234 CABOT STIBEVERLY, MA,
A S.... ................................ ...... ....... To ,FT. DA1 E /.S, !�.��•-�y&S, I hereby certify that I have eKOmined the premises and that the
r�l� 61 3
REFERENCE : ....................�......!9..?Q......... building (s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
shown andthat they oonformed to the zoning setbacks of the
..........I..................................
C:_i. ..v.�-.., -� JITI�..__. .._ when constructed.
NOTE 1 This Is a Mortgage Inspection survey and-not The building (s) are not located In the special flood hazard
an Ihstrument survey , therefore this plot plan Is for zone , as defined by H.U.D.
mortgage Inspection purposes only,
43- ( 42' \.
n ReN
N �(� Poo
Z L7r•Wy wwD - --
t� W 00"tYc4ma
�C, hI-` S13cey
WHE-F,15TH ;IN 01 I HT is
I I'.+. OR LESS AN INSTR. SURVEY IS
RICOMMENDED 70 DDERM Nf:
1n PROP, I INES.
V '
THIS >I iRV Y
f.INi , I ;; ; I ',, I , .SLIRVr ) ;�;; ` O C• ,�
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST , BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION .w;ALc� w` To
C'.;a4c .9.... n�.!1. .?.....
$....... Urn ,�.............................
SCALF , I" = 30 FT. DAZE .l.S. !�.�y.-�y6 S• I hereby certify that i have examined the premises and that the.
REFERENCE : ......... building (s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
Fi 4y Se • f2.�};��,�,.�•�T shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the
— C - - ---.v- - S4- ^^. .... ... when constructed,
NOTE : This Is a Mortgage Inspection survey and-not The building(s) are not located In the special flood hazard
an Ihstrument survey , therefore this plot plan Is for zone , as defined by H.U.D.
mortgage Inspection purposes only. 0(v
43: 42' \\
12 qlj IN
Z L7o R.Y wwD (V ♦♦0NtYCeN3I .- __...
WHENBIER AN 01ISP IS
]".+. DR LESS AN INS1R. SII[iVE.Y IS
REC(1MWNDED 10 DEIER)MINE
PROP, LINES.
THIS