42 BAY VIEW AVENUE - ZBA (002) \2' �
j3
C� �a �'-
�.�'� � tea--.
\�
Legal Notice
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595,EXT.381
Will hold a public hearing for all
persons interested in the petition sub-
mitted by Robert & Elaine Cook
requesting Variance from side yard
setback to rebuild and enclose a por-
tion of epsting porch for the proper-
ty at 42 Bay View Avenue R-1.Said
hearing to be held Wednesday,April
25,2001 at 6:30 P.M., One Salem
Green,2nd Floor.
Nina Cohen,Chairman
(4/11,18)
J
Citp of 9paiem, A1a!5!5arbu!5ett-5
�3oarb of Zippeal CITY OF SALEM. MA
CLERK'S OFFICEE
'�nrta
2001 MAY -3 P 2: 44
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ROBERT & ELAINE COOK REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 42 BAY VIEW AVENUE R1
A hearing on this petition was held April 25, 2001 with the following Board Members
present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Buczko, Stephen Harris and
James Hacker. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting Variances from side yard setback to rebuild existing porch
for the property located at 42 Bay View Avenue R-1.
The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and
structure involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the
purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. Robert and Elaine Cook are homeowners seeking to construct a new entryway for
their Bay View Ave. home.
2. They seek a variance from side setback requirements to allow their front porch to
extend to within 7 feet 3 inches of the property line.
3. There was no opposition to this petition.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ROBERT & ELAINE COOK REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 42 BAY VIEW AVENUE R1
pagetwo
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the
district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested,
subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall
be strictly adhered to.
3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing
construction.
Variance Granted �
April 25, 2001 csc pJ
Nina Cohen, Chairman
Board of Appeal
,y
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ROBERT & ELAINE COOK REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT42 BAY VIEW AVENUE R-1
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
DATE OF HEARING
PETITION R �� 6
LOCATION U
NOTION: TO RANT ✓ SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND
-TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINU
�rhINA V. COHEN
2Stepheu Ha
.;,Jim Hacker
STEPHEN BUCZKO
a RICHARD DIONNE
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
PAUL VALASKATGIS /I
CONDITIONS: ` `7 ,
9
L
CITY OF SALEM. MA CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
CLERK'S OFFICE
,�ooNnf
hw�' --- i BOARD OF APPEAL
1001 APR -2 P 12: 03 3 _
TO THE BOARD OF APPEAL:
The Undergigned represent that they are the owner(s) of a certain parcel of land located at:
Ha 4-1 V;fLO n�xnu-2 Street; Zoning District RI
and said parcel is-affected by Section(s) of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX
A.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
2eC r eAL
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reason(s):
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeal to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the
Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the
enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to
the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons:
/ �2iAnC� 1�"'� S �Cre �R2� SC+ Odlct� "� U
encl0'�rc dt nc2b�),A o- e`Eis }�n`
(PLEASE PRINT) IL&f- t 4Wn`', C
Owner. oht2+ �f Ae �ou l� Petitioner:
Address: Na 3AB 0'tw Address: SA
-Tel;No. y I- U 1116 Tel. No. A-
By:
(Signature)
Date: i� 'goo l —
Ths angka. appiicadon muse be Med with the City Clerk. A certified copy of this petition will be returned to
petitioner at the time of filing with the City Clerk, to then be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeal , four
weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeal, along with a check for advertising in the amount of
$ made payable to the "Salem Evening News".
J,W, +
k��..�_�
ATRUE COPY
ATTEST: fil :Z d Z- ba
1830 9 10"?"
CITY CLERIC
JUN I P511 COVE'
r
�- LOT
AREA-
'�
N/F l�44F>E h
EASE ME yr RIF
ZOAJE
�. r Flood hid ba.uldd.y
e /
o
3 /
0 1
7
$Ayv ► EW AVENUE
THIS PLOT PLAN W$NOT WOE FIRM AN
INSTRUk}(T BURLEY AND S FOR THE IME
OF 1HS BARK WkY. k*M NO CIRMWTAN=
REFEEl"CE: ANE OFFSM 10 BE USS FOR BTABUSMIMT
GEED: REC. 8K 10 9 L3 PG. 13 OF FINClTi, WAUS, HEDGES. EIC.
FN.AN: Pc. BK,73 PL.2 71
7D: SAAI r- op ANERiC/4
I CERnFY THAT THE WLEMG(s) SHOWN HEREON MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN
ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND AS SHOMN AND THAT THEY LOCATED AT
CONFORM TO THE DBAENSIONAL RVItA710N5 ASM Lj;L SAYVIEW AVrNUV'
ZONING BY LAWS OF THE C IT DF S ��M OF�AAS
AT THE JW OF COHSTWCOON OR ARE PROTECTED UNDER a°� ssc Sp LE Ah
GENERAL LAWS CHAPTER AOA $ECTION 7. o';• CA) �, PREPARED FOR
I ALSO OMT" THAT THE PRWR= SHOWN ARE j, P.4BEA2T' J• Co OK
AN LOCATED WTWIN A FLOW HAZARD ZONE AS � SMITH o+ 6LRINE GOOK
DELINEATED ON THE MAP OF DOWWNITY / Z5INH 0107r ko.
SALEM MM iYFECTIVE 8/</�j ° SCALE: 1' 0 3p� MA PCN 1 2000
BY THE FEDERAL EYERCENCY uANANGEMENT Ac;E.N�Y 'pcGISTE�`�'- NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.�
aNAt Lf as 47 �,I(Nbbi ST.. - .SALHM, MA
�A 2AOG REG.IPC / - ,f �J
�a
o �
a� �
south
C3
o�
JJ
� CO � Cr
_ CIO
z c ( o
CD
C-D G-<�
to
o
0
C)
+ o
oCDo
CD �
O
C)a
U) N
-MEN
s
N J
V1
O,
north
C0017 Proposed easy, elm dfncf413 of
scale 14"�l'-0"
cl incy
17 1 .75"
1 1 .75''
10 ' S .25"
ILI
10 0 .25' ' X new entry
stHLO
® chimney
14 ' 5 .25' l
27 6 .25
—j 2 2 .50' '
FRI"]9 18 -G0 .75' '
11 75" 10
25"
��a
ro apt ion
29 ' 11 .75"
Coo ( pro 0�0 �O�y^
��a1eo 1010
AAA
2 8 .25'
7 6 .7511
0 ®
6 ' 1 .00"
exnatnaa
flat roof
7
1
5 .00 ••�
g
12 ' .50" k' X 15 ,00"
u X
8 ' 6 -25' '—
=foundatil'
0 new 10" tu@ies\w
ele.ft footers
° h1olICT" IM-191cook South elev, existlH
42 ' 8 .70" —
R A � 26 I .25i I
N LL-L 6 1 .00' '
Ul5
17 J .00
12 ' S0" �
i
i mo
00"
� IO ' 10
13 11
cookpropos� north 4�, o
3 1W _0
alter existing roof he aBd
rlew Oable Elm cot back deck for better driveway easment
ti
21 ' 2 .75"
chimney
existirng
11 9 -25''11
IT-
foundation
17 ' 6 .00'
grade
cook north elevo IIfnef 4/13/01
exasil �al� 3 ��IIoe�Ieol
roof asphalt
.0o"
exist
21 ' 625' '
I
K \ /
P
.. as / 1
ti
11 11
, ��^'
L , ., - ..,i, ., , .. .. - ,
.. ..., c .. .:. ,:,-:..... r ., .. ..:.: .�
VA
., - .. .. .. :.:• • . `.,'. , -.r - if
,:. ', :r
v '. •. .
.. ., : , ..
- '>: '
• o :' a ,
.. t ,,-,--
, :.. - , .. -. .. -..:-. .. .- ,
.._, f
,. . .
.. :.. _...:r - . . - :.
; r
r : '
. , d C,
C..
:.: --.:
k
,�,��. � �:,:' i �R.� .
60
.
11 p�E vER , .
, Qp� �J DI , ,>
"i�' vG(/j� Lf'a
6J i" F v
cP %
, /' _ " F.
h
P nA�l — ��
WF n ''
AR S
IGN , `b 6 LOCUS MAP
W
R
,
n n ., . . ��- N07 j0.5G" - ,
' -.:moi o
cn % — /
a� — _ 3
---E W,
• + E�
., 2 LOIl 1 #
, — l0 z
, ,
J
�� . F . .
., i Ct -
,. — _. ..-.... O -
- ., . '
11;
i ! L. S
. -
J
— h o� _ -� 1. P
r7t l ,:
;.: — Alb r� a "
P
. ; , . - ,: Ell .- '.` kY' /''.
_ , W
D . .
O
" ::
VAIC .
5
IR r
W
Qt.v.
Lo L AN , �` I
T
N
lR ,
� 14r : p
i
c
_. 4 i11a`
: .. / - V
y _. . . ; . Q
+-
X- ----�
, . :
- .
,`
_. , i I" I t, 00 cr
`c
1.
-_
vo�E �
LO Z
__ SS tea\ �—
<: pa� G
r .� a i3 f7 -
E� f _ -
A �h +' Y v *' 1PYTELLIub �c % -
. . 1 -,7i �x ,a` ` �i i
F `i
eF ,a S --
r• - , . r"ry136 . ORI�E
tint va�E" ' --Ap�*�--
n :
r o -
G \ Sys'" ; E�14, 00n , Q� -
Z , ; I l hT� oP PoRcN.
h
/ nESGNENE
�' � ��� EES j. .1
EIG
p��
i
.
.
�aG
p��
�S ��
{{
b
, baa i
": ", ".
, - ; ,
: - ,
;.
PA
CO. hHOWAI. A/{ET,T E L AI 5�D/VIS A/6 EJUSl PL .4 Al OF LQ/�.1//
i � . /A/6, 0WAIEA(5q/PB Q,C/0T//E L/UES OF PAfEPAAjE`D ,-OFF
1. IE S AA1D WA y5. SNOWA/ A�E TNOSE
'! u� �+ ,`
O : 7U /L 6 P /VA E 5 EE 5 0 Wb 5 ��H� W. (+ A! ��Q I/ U L 70�
.::` -_: .-AL EAOY E5 jM115 ED JA/0 A/O NEW%A/ES' ,
„'
I 'LE /FY NQ /J/moi PL C SEE. VA /QA/LE C AV E!1 /3Y, ydLEAt , : T i �- L06AfEO Al
�T T T T QV OA/FO/fl/5°j!J R R j ,,;. '--.f0 D/V/5/0A OF; E /5 u6 OWVE S�/P.0
..: .IIE607c,
T : d "OF. QPPEdLs'PA ED .. _..:: _."' , .,,.. , . ' ;::
. `=! .i _''. : " THE ,julEr'.f� �EGULQ /OA/5` OF jNE , ZOAAIA/6 ,50 AJD_ T .FOR NEW WA 6` '4 E SAAOWA/
:A DEEDS.,1. ,;, 9EP EA.4,p 4, A99,/ - 9,9 ED .t./ . `` it :. ,:' , .:: ' i, ! N L'GM ' LIQ
. ;.;r _ _ <., _ . , _ „ C.Q. AAeP.@,e, : T R g
t :: w.- O GE OF. 'G Y GLE u
. „
FFi �K :' ,,LllaP E 380,-,AC S Of:/ 6j , h�ec • �._ • `
: �0 , ; j5/
T T R T 9 sfo. �.
, .
, :<,
-,>
s • oeN W _: ZO/J/A/G • A . ,,' : G H/U 5 RV Y,C
Rf,t7 _ R .>
, .'
???s� 11 , ,. - : :, :, 5 L/BE Y 5 EE l!/4DLE OA/ .UAI-
CyrrtR�n�.FtuTLHruso a556s5oA{S . tAAP4a- LD s rC1I431. • ,rI .1. 9 �T jA j ,
PLGAA ,9)EFEA;EA/CF; E.52lf.D #a56 'OP,/J76 =,
. 1. . >,
w.�aem FEET
DEED EI 1, FE EA/CE r E 5 E
g .D R D A3 7 47 P6.66/ . :. . .., O 5 /0. . ,. :2O 0 . .
.. - , .. : .
�f r l
_.. .. �e�'�''�
:'. GI
1.
. , . _ .. ..
.• U
4LL
. . _. .. r. I:: . �_ .r. ,: ..-
` it, 5
- - 11 R
.
•
- % ,
_ _. .
_ _ .
1.
_ ,
,
..r _. :.P EC /32
.. .1 _ ,,.., . .._ .:.:,: I t ,r
- SAME " :,'.,—.; ,11110 , t _
.. ..L. , -o -
.. ,. ,.._,. ... '4