35 394 & 189 CORNER OF BRIDGE & ASH STREETS - ZBA Corner of Bridge & As'n Sts. II-5
Map 35 Lots 394 & 189
Salem Housing Authority _
a-
1 �,
T7 FEr 20 N ' '1
,, f itu of aIrm, C assgr {qse##s
PnxrD of �u�renl
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SALE;•; HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR A
COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT AND VARIANCES AT THE CORNER OF BRIDGE & ASH STS. (B-5)
i
A hearing on this petition was held January 14, 1987 with the following Board
Members present: Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioners, represented by Attorney William J. Lundregan, are requesting a
Comprehensive Permit to allow the construction of thirty five (35) elderly units,
in accordance with the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40B,
Sections 21 to 23 inclusive, Variances from the rear setback and side yard require-
ments of Table III, Section VI of the Zoning Ordinance, and a Variance from the
parking requirements of Section VII of the Zoning Ordinance. The locus of the
property is in a B-5 district.
The Comprehensive Permit and the Variances which have been requested may be
granted upon a finding of the Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the sane district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence present"d at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition to the petition was presented at the hearing;
2. Several City Officials spoke in favor of the petition;
3. The petition has the approval of the Salem Redevelopment
Authority and the Salem Planning Department.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject
property but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial
hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
I
~ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SAT-EN HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR. A
COMPREHENSIVE PER.SIT AND VARIA':CCcS AT THE CORNER OFF BRIDGE & ASH STS.
paSe two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
requested Comprehensive Permit and Variances, subject to the following terms
and conditions:
1 . That all the requirements of the Salem Redevelopment Authority,
design and otherwise, and those of the Salem Planning Department, �
be complied with by the petitioner; !
2. That the building be constructed as per the plans sumitted to the
Zoning Board of Appeal;
3. That all the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to
fire prevention safety be adhered to by the petitioners;
4. That all necessary building permits and a Certificate of Occupancy
be obtained.
COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT AND
VARIANCES GRANTED
r o/
flames M. Fleming, Esq.
Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
FRO f THIS CECISIM. If A'NY. SHALL EE MLDE PURSUANT TO S'--I i% CF T;
L S CHAPTER, 805. AND SHALL EE FILED Pi-TH N 20 DAYS Afi EP T6: r,'-i. Y
T4 < FD:>ION IN THE OFFICE OF THE C:TY CLERK.
PC J To .':SS ECHB.:L LAMA; CHI.FTE" SECT12N 11 THE
S4xLL hM TALE EFFE; U'.TIC A COPY 0r
i W.1 .111 =LPi T.4:aT E.'.YS Ham._ ELUSE✓ i.P:,J Ip; ;'F::L•P" c"..,
'd"n IF S7:d F.": n?PEAR_ H;S BEER FILE T.t AT P HAS 3? Ei G��r{:SSED CP S
RC"2kCED IN' THE SOOIH ESSEX REGISTRY 0P DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER TFE 1,AiLE OF 1,i: C. _
� OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE 0'Il NER'S CERTIFICATE OF Ti TLE.
CM
=i •�J
BOARD OF APPEAL
rn
N
C -
W
,Z
n�
LL
O
1 I 1
FV)
J to —
�PvzKEfZ_ __�S WARE � UO o
- F � w
LL
Z �
� J
—
�P�
LLi
vU Q ° X
ciTY or Se,L.er-j To
�� GURB GUT AND � _x
upAIK EA16I SIpr ALK
(5' 'NI pEi) As. NFL65549Y
11 NEW STKEET TKFES '
x. Jew
C�2' 15' HIGIi ' INDEFKE�ERRE •^ � n'` }N� -' '`/L j 14 Peril y AI.LG. 3
r
5 3' 4' HG7 `` EXiST NG ' I
D SHIZU65IN
' NT1 NG STRIP
� ExiS'(1NG TAyi .
NEW dT,A11N0115 P/YiNG
1 1 z r�nrrorvv ,
A
-
1
m co- -A
f
WATER-SUPPLY 24 _ 1 � . 1 EXlSTiNG 7
Hew
� �_ �Mur•'11y
STING
till
s
Ix .
u \z
OH U 4 uj
UA
_
_ t
`^ o
1 NEW TREES —
� �ES!�/411 � " KT7' I.I N E ( l�W Wibb E • x � 4
GxIST!NU PAf�KI NCB �
C27 ttIGH
wIN& Na "
a