Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
135 OCEAN AVE WEST - ZBA
135 OCEAN AVE. WEST DONALD HESS �S A ,I i T v. flit of "Sttlpm, f ttssnrllusPfts -�, Pourb of 3 22 PH '98 elrr or SAL(:H. MASS CLL RK'S OF FILE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF DONALD & RUTH HESSE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 135 OCEAN AVENUE WEST R-2 A hearing on this petition was held May 20, 1998 with the following Board members present: Nina Cohen, Paul Valaskagis, Michael Ward, Ronald Harrison and Stephen Buczko. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner requests a Variances on side and rear setbacks to allow an addition for the property located at 135 Ocean Ave West. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2 . Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3 . Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful considerations the evidence Dresented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The petition was presented by Donald Hesse, owner of the property. 2 . Basic plans were submitted and to be approved by the Building Inspector. 3 . Kevin Talbot of 134 Ocean Ave. spoke in favor of the petition. 4 . There was no opposition to this petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general . - . Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3 . Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or, purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF DONALD & RUTH HESSE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 135 OCEAN AVE WEST page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 5. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 6 . Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board of Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. 1. Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmonv with the existing structure. Variance Granted P'ay 20, 1998 Paul Valaskagis, Mem erJt Board of Appeal COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11 , the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal PETITIONEO/ DATE OF HEARING CJ /� �_1 �q/ A LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT? SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND WITHDRAW SECOND CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE NINA V. COHEN- MICHAEL WARD RONALD HARRISON STEPHEN BUCZKO lz RICHARD DIONNE ASSOCIATE MEMBERS PAUL VALASKATGIS CONDITIONS: ` t C l � APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . �nar� rrt �1Tgzzt( TO THE BOARD OF APPEAL: The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at: .�:jS-QCBulYI iQC1E Cves� Stree c; Zoning Discrict. . . ... R_2 I'd said parcel is affected by Section(s)'M n Ta ' ••• • - • • • - • - • • - . - . of the Massachusetts State Building Code_ Plans describing the work proposed have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section I% A.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. DIRECT APPEAL a �u n? GA ( T. N CD The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings reason(s) : for the following DIRECT APPEAL The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeal to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of s Zoning By—Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary old hardship to the Ondersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the follow— ing reasons: Requesting a Variance from side and rear setback to construct an addition. Owner. '?:°ld l . . . ..PSS2 Address. y9L.e Lr qe�f.._.... Telephone. Petitioner. I /y lel S� Address. C'G/'^-' (... . .... fc ...... Date. . . .. . ... .. .•. . . . Telephone. ._ �)S' �y�, ..'�.f Z.Z. . .. . . By........ . . . . . . . .. . . .... .... .. .... . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeal with a cheek, for advertising in the amount of S.... ....... . . for B+a�o��pcal. Check nayaSZe ca tLie 5"ar Eveningfour weeks prior CO the Reitc_ HUG-01-97 12 : 18 Hrl P. 02 MORTGAGE INSPECTION 7 BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 200 CUMMINGS CENTER, SUITE#316J, BEVERLY,MA., 01915 LOCATION : SA.t-.. , .,1NOTES: ............. A , „ ,,,, SCALE : 1” =L}D DATE :..7L.Zg �� 1)This Is a mortgage inspection survey and not an ^"-'•"•'••"......•• instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for mortgage inspection purposes only, ., REFERENCE : DEED B!C11 Z60 FYrf 7�5.......... p)This survey is based on survey marks of others. ESSc x $oUTI .DISTQ:tY . • 3)Bushes,shrubs,fences and tree lines do not ,l. .q,§ RY OF OF£D,�............... necessarily indicate property lines. DMR F/NANDA 11 4)Whenever an offset Is 1' +-or less,an Instrument TO: ..........................................b*..............................,.. survey is recommended to determine property The location of the bullding(s)as shown,either lines,and any possible encroachments. complied with the local zoning setbacks at time of 6)Offsets shown are approximate, and are to be construction or is exempt from violation used only for the determination of zoning, Not to enforcement action under Mass. G.L.Title VII be used to establish property lines. Chapter 40A Section y 6)In my professional opinion the building(s)are not loested in the special flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D. LoJ1rJG cE/Z;FICAT1o.` F00�2 8EIWC- 3ASLC0 oN <244'Me i/OA 5ecT 7 © coin i iqt K o✓c e S,Oem4-t,t/F gz�,%gA c re S SHarr� Y Th'PE s BEY ® 2ooFED E�r2atx'Et�th•{ o✓tom Srk['ET y/�� A01"/ �S slate a I t ! ,f00 y5' cv- x � ROBERT �. X u Jm11E3 XX No.26o9a Y ` � t � e�of=tD , I III ; I I � I..il � k i I COO ,o JJ� 4-j _ -.�— � \. �/\H�(V �4 V 1T�R•S. ��a l...g� �✓� a Wi t_.J. �—�L-1 ___ __ i FT-- L -- r c a� Front Elevation - Scale: 1 /411 1 A 4, r'• ,yf 4g+.[ � �9(s.�'��'i� ' _ - .,«r r p r y L .'.rJ1 �� K, yx�. I,•�.. it 1 ...t.;�.a". 9.. a. q.{r vc.�r�t •�i4G� T A ko_ i o •,—I i 4-. V�� K--¢_ -VtL. LTY P `c .y l-.,7F] 1 .. I L S . o "--� G. �Co .._� 'rT— �� oWt-1�FLl N C-s (.._ - 17 ILI v Right Eleation ou Scale: 1 /4" - Lo cw 12A I ' Il I jill � ; I i I I I � - I I ISO T i cu I Fri -IIF- -9 ul ell I co co cu Rear Elevation - i � ~ + Scale: 1 /4" 1 3A i i I Aj Left Elevtion Scale: 1 /4" 26- 0 2YJ, o \ per -o• \ �+ ` v � ll. - O 12�- o 8 -� � I - I d' I /' 9 +� ® 41 10 O f IiI 0-6 UIF LqI m,m Fire IkRw -- - - i - -- - - i 1 i w ..z..._-t II � � � SySTEIvI 5�'Y+ulee DeTe�7o25 � i -7I 4- 5 - Lp # m I n I Noaw zw gy �_ Z S- v • First _Floor Plan_ Second Floor Plan Scale: 1 /4" Scale: 1 /4" ^T5A ! � ' _% 1 • t wR. r sTs e t C. o . c . 1.+.rspl I 1 j lfv�r �,�c 1..1 sem.. 5.,�•.w /1.�t.. c YW� ,-r►+ ��.-�tne.� 12�c.v.T1 ' �a.���.t�.s ,4-y I j f I � I I i I F-� J►R� W �.4�. L L.d�7WT'. 1a �,o Fv t �'S' OV TSIDR X 2v K G.�.aTtt-s.vo vS Ger.aGi4 tTG �ir�"9�i Ca 4 X 4 (Pz ) t .N C.F-R-TY,.Z. W r t'i w 1 3: 1..0 -k C. A ,.76 (1 "S'-o V{ 1T —\� ( c { L J -IL J L JL J L1 JL Jk J L .1 1L L J L J J JL J J � � � F 1 J �• I d � O C- 0 •, a w Af { ► x I zt2 �.Y .N I�t..L4- � xtaeTtr-14 RWR.W A Cr J � -41 1 3 GZL v \'1rt 64_CG r'i Vu.'O.►TO�J �,`\J�...— - , F `- , �. x 1 "�i �c�o c..t R-- t`�.�. ..-rs.t� -7n w "sr 1 r T J 4u FoundWIM Planranung Plan .. i cu . . - _ • e4 114" ! � II N f 1 Cd t ) I � d i e C � 1 CZE - Z.� r \off 1l'Dt6 �sr� sT 1-�cDa. t�Lx�sT 1-��a- (. x � � !-���a. (� �• � o !�o¢.. s/11 �e�ng Joist Framing Plan Floor Fram•n Pian M /4* a� �., Scale: 1 /4 � � ----- - _ E7A w, �' �.r 4'.aT�,+ ,.• .�.'.'i,�=`i , a-.�"� iiJn�� ,` :i w>>y, wJ1F'Sr.":..+:'�'r..r .a ✓,�»7f_ IIIiNlliil i I i I ' Cd I O j 19 �c VIP 10 0 d I ♦ � I� !i J a a I f � I i N � RQQf. Framinit Plan Rorf Plan a , e: 1 /411 Scale: 1 /4" 8A I' 1 —.____._.-�i/ s• 12 ��� 6rG Tia ►�..-b I . • `EYP I G A l.� o i F .-aS'�1i�.V G�'i'1 o ti.j I '. r czr x - 30 \y.6vL /iT� onv Ac Tr . R-•-•°� 1 P� �i •.st_Tc+ u s s F2S ) M ,Tc` - --- (,/a.- +�a,J,►�l , STR.� c„ -'130� ,� 'F7o e--T-v♦ZQ.QS S'C>tLc.t F t GAT\D J I TEMA 12 bio�HT1 '{G.s-.C G e .._t s T R.�HT1 • � I w J rii�o•Q-o s t�1 l�s.b'Q-o o �✓� \ � 3 Tti��-n `.G r, �`�-r� �l�� 'F T. ¢. \L. O. C- . Z •��r-s S a...le. • ( in.•� ul .wa 'ice+ t l 1t I1�N 1£ t IRIS=ll1 tir Ut— I I I T / 1 —l..o �K �..4+ K..41trT. , G•r�►c.P+R..TI�,. - {{ � � -M..,rrt .a Cr ` A.. • o MI." P.%-i E �=- c:- MI.a t3c� �.�1 G.y►vc� �ttTl i4 C.. �.caLTL 5.. A�P5 IT I e j � r i , t -�Illf�iTE 1 rrs. . .:-. __ i f_ .. _�. Nyy;.'43Tfly� f�, k� G;c :SM .n s�;�"✓<n� ,ia..3 7 x - - � .a - - . � rs, ." —. .. C 'a ♦ )5Y' Y k' r� � ':�-:'1• x' � u s .� j � Y n a �*�SrR { �' _. ANNIL- WIndomv Schedule SYM TYPE MODEL G �] )SIZE REMARKS QTY.�) 1` ZUM1 ,2,.411♦ ;K k /s/+ �//U'w1iL ^UJ,w T4-2 "IT z:-s-w x � Gn.S.'G�(c..�T G33S G�¢1ws Saaarsw�S ,t ¢9/u: 7dnn8 I UNIT S'Ih�t x 3 -4'rjc 1 // 11 w� ♦ �..•. z- 1.' Y.{--6/4- 0C., 4 u55, VN�r J Ph53 �s , II � U CU 1� -' O � o Door Schedule SYM. SIZE THK /H RH/LH MAT. REMARKS QTN ( � ) (i 1 v x C. 1 � — !,Rash S�I.� cv- �.�� • 4�..oGh{oN �VJ4 �.-1 ,rr Sl.a.0-�-7 o x (, I 8 13 4 SG �-41 L)Ti! w 27oex- ST«L �� oww �-R- I O1 Z. I,N ( o � c.. l e I��s N,G n.:,.��� M.,.�s IJ ,�. Sa>-•�. -�s � v� I (� V 10 07 / a Pw4 M..4.0 iR, X �!7 II'b ItG �31 - F�.n 1`�\wtoN tom- W - .:.�y _� .p-;K,a•: ,..s -xr. >-.> . ._. vs .: �-arJ,*,... ..fi- "o' � -r, ) >. 'i R'�(� - - .F � w ,,:.,�,. ,�.. y � _ (+ j �v:.^i;. ,R .c. .. i`.. .. . .. .. ,. ' p 1. Jr 4. • i. Y �,:. .. `' ' .J�r. � ii q�' �0�'a �' �i sy�f s"�,++ _ �+ x t r} 1 WL i `� 'a'Al�x�ar rf[t'.�6-��r-yt� �s.1�',�r yt,1 •` ��;" � ti �' • <. i y ` �: t �m - ' - ����� �R e1+:�:T1?'`�➢i�'+p'1 u 4� ai J� .«f ..r�.'�< '.. x A +' S';.(M1 f:Y�Y;.. .� ... a�. �'i '"'. '� A ' , cd _. 4 Qtu.au EO V O y ' r U , 1 r cu 4 n y t 4 r. �v'+•h5 tom:T f s � .. r ..t. - +.,' .. . , a