Loading...
13 CLARK STREET & 26,30,34 BARNES CIRCLE - ZBA 3EClarlk StIl,26, 34, 30 Barnes Circle Robert Stilian, Tr. s "�,, SEP 12 8 54 ail' °89 / y 1, ( 'tU of ttlPm, ttSSMLh128Ptt8 FILc =' I''r 1�� F. vard of zal t9TY 91 v.!"%.. i; �<nmz.a*` DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT J. STILIAN FOR VARIANCES AT 13 CLARK Sr., 26 BARNES CIRCLE, 30 BARNES CIRCLE and 34 BARNES CIRCLE, ASSESSORS MAP 3 LOTS 81, 82, 85 & 86 BAIL CIRCLE/CLARK STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held August 16, 1989 with the following Board Members present; James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Febonio, Luzinski, Nutting and Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner, represented by Attorney Robert Ledoux, is seeking variances for three of four lots on a proposed subdivision which do not meet the required area and for one lot which does not meet frontage requirements. The lots are also identified on Assessors Map 3 as lots 81 , 82, 85 and 86. The locus of the property is in an R-1 district. The variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Several abutters, as well as other residents of the immediate area, spoke in opposition to the petition, citing the addition of traffic to heavily traveled adjacent streets, blasing problems, and changes in the drainage patterns in the area. 2. The locus could be developed by the petition if the lots were joined. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT STILIAN FOR VARIANCES FOR 13 CLARK ST. , 26, 30 and 34 BARNES CIRCLE, SALEM page two Therefore, after a motion to grant the requested variances, with conditions, was made and duly seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeal vote 0-5 against granting the requested variances. The petitioner failed to receive four (4) affirmative votes and, therefore, the variances are denied. VARIANCES DENIED Q James M. Fleming, Esq. Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK P,acna! from this decieion, if ony, shall he made pursuant to Section 17 of �'e Mass. Ceneral Laves, Chapter 308, and sh_II be fged v.itbin 20 drys -. .. e: d,Its c� fllinz IF fl::s decision !n the oltlZu of the City Clerk. C!1 .1,e .d:3. ._!;;� i 1, ne V,r once r. ... he:er sl � r r uy of ..e -tha Cal iif.cat on of the City Clp; thct� 20 days have eased and no appeal he.s been iii ed. .r ihaa, if such aouea; h...s taen f;=:d, tie,t ii has teen dismissed or denied is recorde.', in the South Essex Re,tstry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL Q'Ti#u of "ialrm,IV Htt �ttrl�use##s Planning �3uttra *alrnt (l-rren July 241989 James Fleming Chairman Board of Appeal. Vr,c Sa'Em Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Fleming: On July 20, 1989 in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Planning Board reviewed the petition of Robert 'Stilian, regarding his petition for variances from lot size and frontage to allow property at Barnes Circle and Clark Street to be divided into five (5) lots, which was denied by the Board of Appeal on September 14, 1988. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board agrees that specific and material changes have been made to the petition. Sincerely,, Walter B. Power, III Chairman CM203 � S tA N' 168 2\74 Inv. c 0 \ro 'B3� o �6> 16813 - Q 07.J fX/ IC,Fr C/J j6 a (0 v k (o w N q E9 167.35 PAVE '? 9\off \rO 1 ti /6j53 � 6 6ti. 166.93 <o - _ P 6 60 62 „i _ '-"=_SEO �.A 5 Prop 6 6qp g \ O 16 8 BARNES _ -6 0 62 \6 w N I y0 q . q t 65 n•i �o `7\ vl \6 A.3 `° 6 y . _ \690 PAVEMENT- . . . Proposed \ 7 \5 144 Q 1 6 7 ' 1 --1 55 RiV, SM.H. \ 7 10 16 EX -(161.6 5 L/ 0 1 OQ \63. S T. yb2 --(155.51 \h \52 0 142 0 5 a A � 4 ctrl l.U' 16 \\7 w 1 1 7 PAVE /-� \�7`\ S 63° e 31" E ) 162.37 p ^ P,o 00sP,fCl RCLE \53 A s� 52 Pp5 140 r a \ \rW' In, 2.6 I / 100.' 1619 (0 _--\5\. a6\ 1 6 1 00 ? ° 5 ) A 3 \ q 138 \k 5 Base 1 t66 \) * h 5,b 02 pe'h --. COy.,n --_ 65 Pab o aaio C (J \ ) menf ` (16 Y \ \5 KN --- _- A l 0 h l 606 0` 4.0) i 6q.5 1 l I a =? v Z "l h ,♦ \�' p. 04 r. s ' 6 a'\16� \V,66 8 Proposetl Fou 1 (� - 1 \q8 f �, 5 \a2 y� 6>., \�,'1,C'' 136 Al \6 w n _ ndation ) I In t 5` ". ,f t £ Ike, 1 �, ) 1 v ` (156.0) t��o. 16' 154.54 s 3 a 0 _ ) / Q �� 1 8osement = (15 5) ' / / 3 p9'I \a'h.\ \39 \,ti 3 133. 96 M / W do ) ` 1160 O _� d;N sro�r c ^ / Proposed! G \ N J�,1 1 11` 0 O/ 1 Foundation I \5d0 � i ` ` 'l a0 z 135.88 133.34 / u cb/adl bol, N 159.3 158.4 1 = - CID X/ 62 f m 11, 576 0 1 !6 N S >% ,4' q� q2° G \ a I S. F 160. 7 "' 1 - - - = a 5 'Calf0 .c - ry 1 2' d, 1 N A 2. � 159.9 h \5 ca " / \gg9g39 hoc A r� tiA 0 Nro 0 9, 71 S o 1 155.3 2 0 \q0 9 9 S F o`'e�A\ 5 ooc 0p, A6 ro , 958 /� F o 7 \ e 6 ea 6 \56.8 15 60 / / /\ qo`' /,\` \ 13 .58 16O 54 2 5A 1 55 8 A / \ qxo 158 1 / 156 \53.7 1 155.3 12 9?v 154 ! 152.6 151 .6 150.1 1A7 � \3 \ ` /6 N � A - \ q\ J 152 `53 1101.68 101. 168 107. 54 o qP 150.00 'S 74° 0 5 3 1 E \ ea 5p\ U a0 y J yy. 150 \A9 0 1.6\ I Old Found. \ \�j8 \A \a 1 , \5`9 \36 48 `1 1 1 07 146 I \A7 5 1 \a7,6 1 5 15,000 S.F. `p3 1ao Q 1 1 IA3.5 2 134 144 w1-3 w_ ( vaoJ =- __ _ -�� = _06 __ SALEM PLANNING BOARD av O / _-� _ .-��- =4 \\ - N 13 6 142 a _ 3�5 N o// 31 \35.t- - 161 \ o 134 X40 ! V 138 Z It 1 I Basement= (123.0) I �_� Z 132 C' 136 A)/ I io osed` Founds Yion�� �31 1 3p.\ . 130 9y DATE \ 0 1 132.6_Stone $Pt. Wall 131.01 I \ 134 If \3 i 129.7 I 130.0 I 1293 \303 1 i Inv.= ( 121.5) 132 - - - - - - 16 128 NOTES 1 Elevations are on the Salem City Base. 130128 9123.7 7, h 264 225 `o_ 1241 126 G Existing Contours are solid lines. 23'4` 150.00 5 24.1 124 oA Proposed Contours are dashed lines. 12 S 74005 31 " E c y� \`0 Proposed elevations are in parentheses. 6 � o _ Y 124.61 \2 123.43 P.G. Exist. 10 s Zoning R - I . B" Set Back Requirements V Exist. 8" EXIST. Existw N, ,/ l✓,\ ry,� Front - 15 S O S.M.H. �`v \ Side - 10 9� Exist. 8 \23. M Rim= 123.15 PAVE. 5 CLARK •n' Inv.= 11700 122.40 Rear 3O' \TA\ 122.4 7 S.M.H. 122.49 122. 37 124.05 . Rim= 124.29 123.75 123.11 122 92 \2A �- Inv = 1 16.09 PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN SALEM, MA . FOR )F I," ROBERT STILIAN 60 CHILDS ST. LYNN, MA. REVISED FEB. 2, 1989 SCALE : 111= 201 JULY 1987 LANDMARK ENGINEERING & - _ SURVEYING, INC. 0 10 20 40 60 80 LYNN, MA. ( SHEET I OF 2) Sf m` 158.,\q \nv c 0 \e o 168.I 3 _0 Q y s ° u' co W e ,e'6a CV 10 S \6"( W .35 PAVE A Q(o 9` \ 00 \ ^ ti r6j53 Z' F> \63 9\ �c 166.93 .. P1?0 \660 � 5 \62 Z 'S 0 lea BARNES 6A Prof \6A0 ro v 1 6 \6 q ilk h \T\ \64.3 p�. i?' veil \69.0 6 PAVEMENT. . .. Rime setlS.MH \56 144 0 (D a 100. \61. � -- EX I S ��_- 55 Inv _ (161.6) L O5 o t 00 A 4 \63 T. X462, (155.5) F \y \y0 142 c�,e16, ,° \61\T 1 S 63° 381 16 A E -PrO°pC I R C IL E q ,r% \02 6 y'L 140 %It, F ` ' \69 s R \ 639 31" E z.37 p' ry Sed \5� D Inv 1 1001 1619 ro 5\. A6 � 1 -(162.6 I I / ; 00 ,. 593 s. B„ Q 138 k (D I Q h \ S,0 \ 6 \° Q 5 I 6oseme r \66 \� / / -- _ 1 7 Y y \5'h \902 ' \p9 ^-(o - \A6� > 9 x666° °tea \V n/ _ (164.pj Y � ' A5 1 - l I i '/ _? o -- ._ 2 00 .t. ,.��' 13. �- Proposed _ 16 \6g. 4 (o AZ' F ` \� �' 136 AlT S \66 0�16 �6g 8 oPosed Foundation $ - _ / 5` A E ' AAy 5 it S W C, r= I I 1 Inv = (156 \k0 \ 16' N / / �� _ / n �� 1 B0$pment , (157.5) ' / / 3 \q9� 54 9 \A9 \ \'Sa- \�'l\ 3 13 g6 3 N I tat W 1 - 1 160.0 _� e4 a _ \;Naov r? i - - Pr°Posedl \ (D `1+p 1 -o N O/ I FOUndotion 2 0 �� 1 !• W133.34 N 159.3 \58.4 = (p �si�nrb ° 1 �_ ao m 5 b 11, 576 7 N o _ I6' N 53 ..yy ; A� p20 S ' - - a 1 . F. \60 . N A.3 \59 9 to \5 N / \AA9g99 `,�` \oc / r74 �a O 9 O / ec 0°\ 6 \, • h9 �0 T 7 1 $, 2 \Ag 9 ` I ai 9, 958 /� ses\A\ h F°Jc 0� arO 1 155.3 co S.F, \ 0o ea ��O ;� ' • \ �'h A 6 \511 \A / 160 54.2 \5 ° 6 \55.8 I 60 / / / Q\ C `° 3 158 156 \5.5 1 \55.3 2 6 15©.12 \A7. \39 \v 6 154 I\ J 152 \53 q 1 101.68 1 O 1. 168 107. 54 \ \o QP a 150.00 S 740 05' 31 "E 150 \5 \ \A9 \AA6\ I Old Found. 148 1 \A g I i sl �a. 146 1 1 \q3. 5 140 15,000 S.F. 1 1 \ .5 134 Ag 14 4 1 - - - - SALEM PLANNING BOARD (I\ O +-' \� - - - O D1 fro 142 0 (� J o O// \35,\- - -� 161 \ o 134 140 n / I , u, ` 138 z L- I 1 Bosemenr= (123.0) z 132 a Gj 136 A/� ; i =oposedl, Foundation r \3\ 1 90 \ 130 5. DATE : I \ 0 1 132-6-Stone .6rt. Wall 131.0 1 I .+` 134 \3 i 977 I 130.01 129. I �, \303 I I 121,5) - - J 132 128 NOTES u I ; Elevations are on tlhe Salem City Base. 130j28 9 2-375 h 11264 / 1/225-- (D- t24,% 126 G Existing Contours are solid lines. 4' 150.00 / 2A \ 124 °a Proposed Contours are dashed lines. 126t2g5 S 74° 05' 31 " E c 5� �`0 Proposed elevations are in parentheses. \25� Zoning R - I 12461 123.43 LP.G_ Ezist.. 10 5 ° s Exist. 811 „r Set Back Requirements Ezisr e" ExlsT. u'h `2 Front - 15' hr w ✓ � tiv Side - 10' 9'h Exist. \2 M Rim= 123.15 PAVE. ' 9 CLARK 1 Inv. = 1 1 7.00 122:.40 Rear - 30 2a ` S.M.H. 122. 37 122.47 R 124.05 W 124.29 123.11 122.92 12 2.49 Inv = 1 16.09 12375 PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN SALEM, MA . FOR OF ROBERT STILIAN 60 CHILDS ST. s, LYNN, MA . REVISED FEB. 2, 1989 ` ' ' '.. .. SCALE : 111= 201 JULY 1987 LANDMARK ENGINEERING & -- - _ SURVEYING, INC. 0 10 20 40 60 80 LYNN, MA. ( SHEET I OF 2) S 'H, \68.21\A \58. 0 a 68 /633 \68 0 S O ekr F�; co s m r6T63 co - '6 � ose�o\\ W Q a 6 A 69 16to 135 Pq VE ^�� Q 0\o \ m e \ �. 1 ej53 S wry. e\ 5 e a \6 `c 6 166.83 _ "PRO PO SED \660 w�645 Prop 611 \6 \64. m \6,L 'b \ Z \60 .6e BAR NE w N , \ys 4 S m A \ M o N 1�v� y' \1\ 9 \e A - to 56 1 \ 144 �. ? v \6 VE :._._.__ _ Propose / Pq \ 0 loo 00 \616 MENT. . .. . . . 4- \6�..1.� EX1ST _tb2..5, Rim�(155.5)MH \515 \ \� \h2 p 142 caro ' 16"�\1 - A , ?! � 1 . PAVE '--- -' s e 'L '� !�- o \61 S63° b, C � RG+ � A i 52 5 140 I \e _ R� \\ I 6398 31� E 162.3? _� ti oppsed \53 \A PO Inv- I \ 1001 1619 \5\.9 A6 I (16 00 jr� 558 s . 8„ f A9� \ oQ 138 o w s.0 a a` oQ _a, 5 bb e S \ I 8oseme 166.\ / / 4 h \53 0 \50 Z \q8� N --_.._ _ \A6- 0 / 0 t". _ \ "1 = (16 4.of Y / 5 1_ I i = v v .Z �. c, t• \0 O. 0 /- c vV\ 6 8 Pro 1 L 164 \63. 1 i 1 4 /� \A6 f 5 \AZ 5� P.6`�,, o'' 136 S• 166 0\16` �6 Posed Foundation I 1 In \ w a _ I 1 v. = (156.0) I'a 16 154.54 s g3 �b / p 1 Bosement __ 133. 96 N u) .111 _ a 1 (157.5) / c 1.-5 \A9 8 \ 0 _� o P \5 \A 9 V o _ g9 N _ ; r Posedl \6A -_ to +"I I `"A N O^/ L 1 Foundo tion N \SAO /� - \ A N O �� \A5 �'S \35.88 133.34 / tai \ Z o wSe/aeli 1. N 159.3 158.4 i c 2 11, 576 I 0) 1 1 (O OU 1 _ 16 N \A1 \� , 5 76 1 S. F. Iea .7 N 0 5„� N r 2 a , N u A A rii0lt� h 159.9 \5 N at v\AA 3 \q 9 c�\ a°�o° /S \ , ham' 'y6ryb 0 9, 7 S 2 5 0 Ae a 9, 958 / F¢ ,° �. D, 3 S.F./ o en\ F e � y- ° b � 1 j 55 \ 4 ea •56 \ 13 58 41 1605A.2 8 I 156 \53.1 1 155.3 6 150.12 Al 154 4 152 53 ' 101.68 101. 16 8 107. 54 \ 1 150.00 S 74° 05� 31 ��E � 6y - eye I \A \„Pg + \0 \ 150 \5 \a9 'U A 6 I Old Found. ' 9 q6 A \36 LY F*zh�o t48 A 5 ti 146 1 \A1.5 I \A1 6 I a Ba A5 5 15,000 S.F. 140 I I 134 IA-5 I 14 4 I 1 _ - -_ SALEM PLANNING BOARD w _ - (r�toJ - __'_ _ _�� w 138 In 0 too \0 136 1420 Inoi3� �� I 31 .e' - 16 , \ �n � 134 V 140 138 z \ z 132 Gj I IBosement = (123.0) _�_ 136 A// I I ioposedt, Foundot'ion � X31. 1 30.\ 130 by DATE I 0 1 1326-Stone $Bt. Wall 131.01 134 / \3\ 1�.7 I 130.01 l29'3. \303 I i Inv_( 121.5) - - 132 - 16 ' 128 NOTES Elevations are on the Salem City Base. 130 _ 4 7Q�D � . y 1126 / 1/2� 5-- `O- 12q,1 126 Existing Contours are solid lines. 128 9 23.4` 150.00 / 2A \ 124 ob Proposed Contours orre dashed lines. °7405 S 74- 05" 31 " E 126 1245 1 c y. c , Proposed elevations are in parentheses. 1 Y L 124.61 \25 P6. ExistIQ�1 � Zoning R - I 123.43 . 5 c c s h � Exist. B" w Set Bock Requirements EXIST. Fron } - 15 Exist. 8 w t✓ I✓^h titi N 5 S.M.H. 10, ` Side - 10 8i1 1 9'S Exist. \23 ^Y Rim= 123.15 PAVE. _ \� 5 CLARK ," Inv.= u7oo I22.4c0 Rear 30� b 124.05 \2 S.M.H. 123.11 122.92 122.49 122. 37 122.47 Rim= 124.29 123 75 Inv = 1 16.09 PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN SALEM, MA . FOR ROBERT STILIAN 60 C H I L D S ST. LYNN, MA. ?t REVISED FEB. 2, 1989 SCALE : 111= 201 JULY 1987 LANDMARK ENGINEERING 8 - --- SURVEYING, INC. 0 10 20 40 60 80 LYNN , MA . ( SHEET I OF 2)