The URL can be used to link to this page

0 SKERRY STREET COURT - ZBA I Q Skerry Street Court R-2 S Mark Petit r- N' V p\ V J s U DATE OF HEARING la q' (o Zzz PETITIONER LOCATION 'v�J� MOTION: TO GRANT- SECOND 4 TO DENY SECOND �J�l y CSL TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL ✓ �/ RICHARD' FEBONIO !✓ ✓ ( / EDWARD LUZINSKI WY JANE STIRGWOLT ✓ ✓ ASSOCIATE MEMBERS / RONALD PLANTE ✓ CONDITIONS: d_,17_6/QF/ %ovlI /,77� _L 6a _ 3 c._ o� V SKERRY - H STREET COURT Orxca ' 0 NM rn 3 `A� C� A i N c o� 1 N c� c = I � I 0 _s d 1 5 S- 3 LC o � SKERRY STREET COURT 0 � 0 n 3 -�1 C 0 --tom-- ce r C O. (nom Zd-0 " or- � 1 M G -A- _- -:�- Z-Z. r r; O. C 76-,-57,s9�? 2`j (p \- � r CZ) ? C h 0O� /4 ,v \IS / S + /Q765:ioo <p F R Sig ^ tI l)/ y, ;^> ; 3� /g0 ly /39ea `i ap 0 9 p q JS s� ° k /ry 3q 1q A 14 �� /? N.q�y► ?Y "`? 'o ) 490 �qO IC) P °a 13 rr l3 /^ CO / to. 0 - -. �PARKING M ti 1013 f 47 -.,t^.. F' � � 1`_: ' S! ' ;tet • <��'�"n ! _ ti I��`1�� pti��i \, fits oftticm, � ttssttcltusetts -$gourd of Au}ienl '91 APR -3 P 3 :08 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR VARIANCES AT SKERRY STREET COURT (R-2) CITY C:.`:W OFFICE SAff r! , 111 " A hearing on this petition was held March 20, 1991 with the fo 'lowing Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Secretary; Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from all the requirements listed on Table I of the Salem Zoning Ordinance Density Regulations. The property is located in an R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures, in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . That presently there is a storage garage located at the sight which the petitioner proposes to raze in order to construct a new one family dwelling 2. That the lot is 2400 sq.ft. and would require variances for front, rear and side yard setbacks, density and frontage, as well as minimum lot size . 3. That the current owner has owned the lot for less than a year. 4. That the proposed dwelling house would be either stick built or pre-fabricated but the dimensions in either case would remain the same. 5. That there was no opposition to the petition during the public portion of the hearing. 6. That Edward Martins, a direct abutter, spoke in favor with the condition that there be a seven foot rear setback, that a six foot high wooden fence be erected along the back property line, and that any windows in the rear of the house be as per plan submitted . 7. That one other abutter spoke in favor of the petition. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR VARIANCES FOR SKERRY STREET COURT, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: '91 APR - 1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the Psu6�ject property and not the district in general. CITY�gC��L��ER��-: . OFFICE 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zonin�`Inane• would not involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted three (3) in favor, two (2) opposed (Ms. Stirgwolt & Mr. Correnti) to the motion to grant the requested variances. Having failed to garner the necessary four affirmative votes to grant the variance, the petition is hereby denied. VARIANCES DENIED March 20, 1991 eljosEoh C. Correnti, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass.General laws, Chapter 808,and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of the decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Caws, chantar 808, Section 11, the variance or special Permit granted f ele:a sh:.a not take effect until a copy N the decision, bearing the certification m the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been tiled, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisses or r'eiied is recorded In the South Essex Registry of Deeds and in-,axed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Titls. BOARD OF APPEAL, (fit" of _-'�ttlem, fttssadlusetts j -6nttrD of -�LuPeal JUL 3 N CITY SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR VARIANCES AT SKERRY STREET COURT (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonic, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from lot size, . frontage, side and rear setback, front yard depth and lot coverage to allow construction of a single family dwelling in this R-2 district. Before hearing the merits of this petition, the Board of Appeal had to consider if there is substantial and material change from an application for a single family dwelling that was denied by this Board on March 20, 1991 . The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented, and after receiving Consent from the Salem Planning Board, voted unanimously, 5-0, that there was a substantial change, said change being the acquisition by the petitioner of an additional.310 square feet of land from the abutter which would increase the size of this under- sized lot and allow petitioner to meet the parking requirements as set forth in the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, they would hear the petition. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The existing building of this site is dilapidated and is a hazard to public safety. 2. The petitioner has reached an agreement to acquire an additional 310 square feet of land from an abutter. 3. The petitioner acquired this property in hopes of utilizing the existing structure but found it in such a state of deterioration that this was not feasible. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR VARIANCES AT SKERRY STREET COURT, SALEM page two 4. Several City Councillors spoke in favor of this petition, citing the hazards of the existing building and the improvement to the area that the proposed structure will be. 5. The placement building will be a small prefabricated single family dwelling that will be compatible with the other residential uses in the neighborhood. 6. A single family dwelling is not detrimental to the R-2 zoning district while the pre-existing commercial use was. 7. Many neighbors and abutters spoke in favor of this petition while none spoke in opposition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to a the -petitioner. m ti The ,relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of m the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 'f4i�rEErore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done in compliance with city and state building codes. 2. All construction be as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. A building permit be obtained. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 6. A 51 foot fence be constructed along the Martin & Sowalski property lines prior to commencement of construction. 7. Windows on the side of the building abutting Martin & Sowalski be limited to those shown on the plans submitted. 8. The petitioner acquire 310sq.ft. of land from Lot 153, owned by William Little. 9. Proper street numbering be obtained from the Salem Assessor. 10. Demolition material is be be removed promptly and not left over night. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR VARIANCES AT SKERRY STREET COURT, SALEM page three 11 . Extermination/relocation of wildlife on this property will be completed before the existing structure is demolished. Variances Granted June 26, 1991 Mary Jafil, irgwolt, Me r, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, H any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of. the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed wlthin 20 days after the dateiof filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws,Chapter 808, Section 11,the variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal his been filed,that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL n ocr - M ttQl. re's �j ��M.covolT,,.to �s 9 P. f��Cl.ylSg Day<� Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSAGHUSETTS01970 June 25, 1991 Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman Bencal : The Salem Historical Commission is in receipt of your agenda for June 26, 1991 of which petitions for 25 Beach Ave . , 152 Bayview Ave . , 7 Roslyn Street, 121 & 123 Boston Street, 86 Summer Street and 92 Columbus Ave . will be heard. Enclosed for your information are building survey forms for these six properties, which are between 75 and 150 years old. In addition, please be advised that the location prppcsed:for construction of a single family dwelling at �4Skerry Street Court is surrounded by historic properties including 1 & 2—Skerry�+�v Street Court and 64 Bridge Street . While the Commission takes no position on these petitions, we are hopeful that the decisions made on these properties will be with careful consideration of their historic fabric and those in their surrounding neighborhoods . In this regard, the Commission would be pleased to offer design review, should the Board of Appeal request such services . Thank you for your consideration . Sincerely, THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION Annie C . Harris Chairman J4136 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` { (9itV, of nlP assar Setts �•. Paurb of '4peA TO THE BOARD Of APPEALS: The Undersignerepresent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . .9kerry Street ,Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. R-2. and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Direct Appeal r y — Mo On w 1 c^r c= CL M C f._ W CL rn w� w �— �4} R o w�y (n cri C � {�— m The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: Direct Appeal The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose-of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Petitioner owns the lot on Skerry Street Court, as sham on plan submitted herewith vWch has a lot size of 2,400 square feet and on which the current use is commercial. Petitioner wishes to purchase from an abutter an additional 310 square feet, tear down the existing commercial building and erect a single family house in this R-2 district. In order to accomplish this, Petitioner needs variances from all of the requirements listed on Table 1 Of the Salem Zoning Ordinances Density Regulations as Petitioner will have only 2,710 square feet, only 21.65 feet of frontage on a public way, the proposed dwelling will occupy considerably more than 354, the depth of the front yard will be only approximately 6 feet, the side yard approximately 8 feet, and the rear yead only 7 feet. Owner. . )-a'j, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. -) /h`` . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . T ". D . ,. 5� .. . . . Petitioner. .kkrl .PQt T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . .7.N'laTch Street Court Salem;'MA. .DIM. Date. .jTIe. f,. l.. . . . . . . 744-5467 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �„ AYTeyUz7 .� . . . . . . . . . . V'r j. .0. 'A': . . . . . . . By. S �2� uce� 17- Three ?Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PEI ITION 10 BOARD OF: APPEALS LOCATION ............................................I................... PEI 11 ION I:R.. ........ ...........-................. ADDRESS........................... ........................... .................... CONDI I IONS ............................ ...I........ ....................... ........................ .. .................................... ............................................................... ............................... ................ ..................... ........................................... ................................................................. .PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... 19 Ctu of �31rnl, cissarbil spits Planning Bomb fur lem (6rrrit May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP f I� r (�itg of "ttlem, Httsstttl��z�etts Poarb of 'G Pve81 hF.UIrv"F.� ' T July 3, 1991 r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED INTTHE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE?P,ETITION OF MARK PETIT FOR VARIANCES TO:AALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT SKERRY STREET COURT. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board de pursuant to Section 17 of 'Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be ma the Mass.General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days 808, Section 11,the variance .after the date�of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. the Pursuant to Mass.General Laws, Clerk that 20 days have or Special Permit granted herein shall no[take effect t 2 a copy decision, bearing the certification of thoer=hat, if such appeal has been elapsed and no appeal has been filed, filed,that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South recEssord C Registry of Deeds and indexed under nems Certificate the name rofhTitle.ner of record oG �g poorded aad noted�^the o BOARD OF APPEAL t Ctu II �I�Ent, c 552tr�1u5Eft5 ire Department 3irabquarters Recum+e 48 `j:ufaVcffc _'�'-trcet ttlem, iu. 01970 Joseph F. Sullivan Chief City of Salem RE: Skerry Street Court Board of Appeal Mark-Petit One Salem Green The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Variance to allow con- struction of a single family dwelling at Skerry Street Court, subject to the following conditions: 1- Plans for the proposed construction are presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance.of a building permit. 2- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, 527 CMR (Code of Massachusetts Regulaitons) , the Salem Fire Prevention Code, the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire safety. 3- The applicant shall arrange for an inspection by the Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. Signed, 7 0 P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: file applicant ��",`��"`''a.� �i�>5T pry �SITIETIT, �tiSStTC�IxSEttB (Office of the Ctg Touncil (Qitq Mall unKc COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE GEORGE A. NOWAK WARD COUNCILLORS 1991 PRESIDENT 1991 DONALD T.BATES GEORGE A-NOWAK GEORGE P.MCCABE JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO KEVIN R HARVEY JOHN R.NUTTING CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO RICHARD E.SWINIUCH LEONARD F.O'LEARY June 26, 1991 DAVID B.GAUDREAULT SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal and Board Members, I would like to be recorded in favor of the petition presented to the Board by Mark Petit, re':F Skerry Street�Court The petitioner has purchased abutting property to increase the lotsizand hs received an approval from the Planning Board that a substantial change was made to the plan. I support the Board granting Mr. Petit the permit to construct a single family i home on this parcel of land and I hope that the Board approves the petition before P them. Sincerely, 4Gorge P. McCabe Councillor-At-Large M20WP Offitg of 'Salzm' 'fflazzar4usPfts :. Vfire of the Ctg (1louncil fQitq�ittll COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE GEORGE A. NOWAK WARD COUNCILLORS 11191 PRESIDENT 1991 DONALD T.BATES GEORGE A.NOWAK GEORGE P,McCABE JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO KEVIN R HARVEY JOHN R.NUTTING CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO RICHARD E.SWINIUCH June 26, 1991 DAVID ONA GAUDDF.O EAU T SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal and Board Members, I am writing in support-ofrthe-revised.petition of Mark Petit, to construct a single family home, on Skerry Street Court. Since the petitioner has purchased the additional square fbotageof-land-abutting his property, and has the approval of the City of Salem Planning Board, I am in full agreement that the petition should be granted. I am in support due to the fact that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood, and replace it with a single family residence. I fully support the Board granting this petition. Respectfully, /iGo, l 47 Kevin R. H rve Ward Two Councillor MZ0WP iC to of ttlenT, s�ttrlaxi�e##s J� w. `°°N` Q�nett1em (Sreell May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP L ,r'C° ��1��' e`.f' r7�' ,ya�c��iS� ir11111Y f3t�7!j)G n a9� . �/• 4 ��; URI, /AdWA IE7 1-71 V q �y F '� r '`r .417iT'�i�h/.7_y �`ah11• •,.�—�1 i ,�Q��G�LLIG I"`.J MODULAR kOh�SALES k CONSULTAN'S 33 BRIDGE STRe AT. SUITE 105 SALEM. MA 043.70 15081977-0^47 1 y F a i N � 1 fr �xr ' M1 ir� 4 a .•�� . I�d � ol is 14 1 1 If. ry 1-77 Q411 f,f,)elNh�r r-17a0lilng F✓. MODULAR Hrl-ME SALES & CONSUf--"ANiS 33 BRIDGE STREET. SUITE 105 SALEM. MA 01970 4508)977-0097 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . of 15ttlem, Mnssar4usefts �- �R>1arb af C�"rzd TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The UndersigneSi represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . . akerry Street.Court. . . , , • • • • • • • • • • • .. . , . • • , .Street; Zoning District. R-2. and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Direct Appeal c ^� s tr w <[ co a F m 7 U The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: Direct Appeal The Undersigned hereby petitions the Boa; d of .Appc:ls to -vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from,the intent and purpose-of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Ntitioner owns the lot on Skerry Street Court, as shoo-m on plan submitted herewith which has a lot size of 2,400 square felt and on which the current use is commercial. Petitioner wishes to purchase from an abutter an additional 310 square feet, tear down the existing commercial building and erect a single family house in this R-2 district. In order to accormlish this, Petitioner needs variances from all of the reouirements listed on Table 1 of the Salem Zoning Crdinances Density Regulations as Petitioner will have only 2,710 square feet, only 21.65 feet of frontage on a public way, the pr000sed dwelling will occupy considerably more than 35%, the depth of the front yard will be only approximately 6 feet, the side yard. approximately 8 feet, and the rear yeah only 7 feet. Owner. . ., .-.,.,. . ." i !L l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . .K1tC't Cy `l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . .)17: . :.�. . , 5,f Ca Petitioner. AA Tt.Tet1t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . .7.March Street Court Salem;';4A' 'b997b' • ' • • ' • • • ' . Date. .WIP. 1991• • • . . . Telephone. . . . 744-5457 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks .prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. - m� �1�dpN _ 'b�� (�t� of "SaIQTYT, 4HFI882.TCh1T$EttB 4 fil (Offire of tot (tlitg (tlounril - '�� @litq dull COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE GEORGE A. NOWAK WARD COUNCILLORS 1991 PRESIDENT 1991 DONALD T.BATES JOSEPHINE RFUSCO GEORGE A.NOWAK R.GEORGE P.MCCABE KEVIN R.HARVEY JOHN R.NUTTING CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO RICHARD E.SWINIUCH LEONARD F.O'LEARY June 26, 1991 DAVID B.GAUDREAULT SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal and Board Members, I am writing in support of the revised petition of Mark Petit, to construct a single family home on Skerry Street Court. Since the petitioner has purchased the additional square footage of land abutting his property, and has the approval of the City of Salem Planning Board, I am in full agreement that the petition should be granted. I am in support due to the fact that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood, and replace it with a single family residence. I fully support the Board granting this petition. Respectfully, li o, / Kevin R. Harve Ward Two Councillor M20WP Titg of "'IiWem, 'MassachusEtts Of fire of the THU Tounrif fllitq Wl COUNOLLORS-AT-LARGE GEORGE A. NOWAK WARD COUNCILLORS 1991 PRESIDENT 1991 DONALD T.BATES JOSEPHINE RFUSCO GEORGE A.NOWAK R. , GEORGE P.McCABE KEVIN R.HARVEY JOHN R.NUTTING CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO RICHARD E.SWINIUCH LEONARD F.O'LEARY June 26, 1991 DAVID B.GAUDREAULT SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal and Board Members, I would like to be recorded in favor of the petition presented to the Board by Mark Petit, re: Skerry Street Court. The petitioner has purchased abutting property to increase the lot size, and has received an approval from the Planning Board that a substantial change was made to the plan. I support the Board granting Mr. Petit the permit to construct a single family home on this parcel of land and I hope that the Board approves the petition before them. Sincerely,,, 4Gorge P. McCabe Councillor-At-Large M20WP t LLitU of tttPili, C4R1 a5Eiar u5Ptts ire Department �ieabquarters Re��wNc 48 ?Gafgefte *trret Salem, c�Ua. 01970 Joseph F. Sullivan Chief City of Salem RE: Skerry Street Court Board of Appeal Mark Petit one Salem Green The Salem Fire Departrent has no objection to the granting of a Variance to allow con- struction of a single family dwelling at Skerry Street Court, subject to the following conditions: 1 Plans for the proposed construction are presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, 527 CMR (Code of Massachusetts Regulaitons) , the Salem Fire Prevention Code, the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire safety. 3- The applicant shall arrange for an inspection by the Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. y/ e�glU��J I ��V4:4'� 0 P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: file applicant Chi#u of $n1enl, Kils$ttr1�n E##� sItttttting 'Nourb One *alem (6reett r • May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal ?r, Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 795-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter ested in the petition submitted by MARK PETIT for Variances to allow construction of a single fam ily dwelling at SKERRY STREET COURT(R-2). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,JUNE 26, 1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,2nd Floor. ..»., RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter. ested in the petition submitted by MARK PETIT for Variances to allow construction of a single fam ily dwelling at SKERRY STREET COURT(R-2). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,JUNE 26; 1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter ested in the petition submitted by MARK PETIT for Variances to allow construction of a single far ily dwelling at SKERRY STREET COURT(R-2). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,JUNE 261 1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,2nd Boor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 • CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter. ested in the petition submitted by MARK PETIT for Variances to allow construction of a single far (ly dwelling at SKERRY STREET COURT(R-2). Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,JUNE 26, 1991 at 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (gitg, of ttlPm, ttssttt lt$Ptts J��Dm1! TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . .?1��qrgy. St€pgt .Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. R-2. and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Direct Appedl 4 m� {3t +"j� c n y W L6 R 3 CC CC! QO U� CD O J M � C The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: 'Direct Appeal The Undersigned hereby pet t ons the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building -Code for the following reasons: Yeti6.ioner owns the lot on Skerry Street Court, as shown on plan submitted herewith %bich has a lot size of 2,400 square feet and on which the current use is conmrcial. petitioner wishes to purchase from an shutter an additional 310 square feet, tear down the existing cchmuercial building and erect a single family house in this R-2 district. In order to Pccorolish this, petitioner reeds variances from all of the requirements listed o.a Table 1 of the S&Ie;m Zoning Ordir-snces Density Ilegulations as petitioner will have only 2,710 square feet, only 21.55 feet of frontage on a public way, the proposed dwelling will occupy considerably more than 35%, the depth of the front yard will be only approximately b feet, the side yard. approximately 8 feet, and the rear yeas} only 7 feet. Owner'C_' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. ?�'J' t .&-.r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mark Petitioner. . . . . . Petit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . ...7 March Street Gour't . . . . . . . . . . Juane 1991 W ,..MA. .01470. . . . . Date. . . . . . .s�?>. . . . . . . . . . . . . im; Telephone. . . .744-5467. . . . . . . . . . . . . . )l'r A�P2N2> By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � /,jn_ rHaC Sr RtvC2sY, /-lq - 0 9/J Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PEI II ION '10 BOARD OF APPEALS LOCAIION ............... ................. ............... PEII I IONER.-....................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDI-I IONS .......................... .................................... .................. ...... .. ............................... ................................................................ ........... .................................I............. ............................-.................................. ................................. ........................... PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED............... .. ...... 19 a - planning �30ttrb Ow Salrnt (16run May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP of �5,ttlrra, ttrljuse## 0 Planning �3nttra Our Salem Green May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP Ctu of lent, Httssttcl�use##� h Planning 19nttrb <9ne ,alem Green May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP .� Ctu of ttlen�, tt�sttrl��isP## J�Cp@i¢ Our �$ttI£m (6r££n May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP Planning �3nttxb ��0�"' VrnP �rtlPm (�rEEtt May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP �.� ,: ... Cnt#fir of �nle�tl, �fttssttl•��u�e##� fl�ize �tt1em (�reell May 22, 1991 Richard Bencal Chairman Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Skerry Street Court Dear Mr. Bencal: On May 16, 1991, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of Massachusetts General Laws, the Salem Planning Board met to discuss the application of Mark Petit for a "Determination of Specific and Material Change" to his plans for the construction of a single family dwelling on Skerry Street Court which were denied by the Board of Appeal on March 20, 1991. Mr. Petit has aquired an additional parcel containing 310 s.f. which will increase the size of his lot from 2,400 to 2,710 s.f. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that "Specific and Material Changes" have been made to the petition which was denied by the Board of Appeal. In addition, the Planning Board is pleased that this petition will remove a business use from a residential neighborhood. Sincerely, GUat`& , /GZG�/L Walter B. Power, III Chairman M18WP -BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE." lell 2rt- 9, 2 04P"' la :ABUT �CERTZFIM TERS'LTST, l 4 3 • �2.. ............L . .. .................. ... 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: P 1AP. 36 LOT. 0149 SUFF-. 5 6 0 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0000 SKERRY STREET COURT .10 6 ASSESSED OWNER EELLI MARk 7 9 ........ ... 10 • 9 FF -s 9 ja V D6RF�q-; ASSF MAT 1, 13 10 14 11 0 L16 0145 001:2' SKERRY STREET' 20 SALEM CITY OF CARLTON SCHOOL 5 . 12 1-6 T7 3 '.36 '0'.146 "-k NWRCE8 ",'6l,:SkERRY'sT.....s s' tl'll , - 3008, SKERM,8TRE--" Ibc c-" 18 14 �Ck tIADErINE, a,l,' ........ bt. §xc l0l 97,0-'- l' T9 194-1411 p- 21 16CAHILL.. M ALICE SALE11 MA 01970 - 22 0 17 36 0148 0002 SKERRY STREEr COURT JACKIMOWICZ BOLESLAUS J 2 SKERRY ST CT 23 0 I Act'.101"I"Icz 'ANE 1=1 EN MA 0197Q 4 06, f k �RAYM(")N'o l",J."o s Me,W 1�4 "y DGE li 26 19 ........ DGE-MARION-L-* At!-Etla MA 01970 27 .. ...... .. 2 21 "TAU 0 4, A z R 29 22 SHIRLEY M SALEM MA 01970 Lo 0 2336 0-152 j 310 — 0070 BRIDGE STREET NICOLE REALTY TRUS T 70 BRIDGE 67 24 F-MT1 TANc&jT(-.7 R A X P 7 -1 R�,- qA1 EN MA n197n 32 6-4>ZRJ,QGE, 'R T3 T4 ;'I'T'ME fWlkh ° ST ax I 6 ..... ioz L UAN A'�Z SA L E r4l fqw'�04 9-70 l...... . 3 ....... niaA-��lp,Rrw,�r58- R ........ ... z— 37 27 ,& N REE1 ACWC jEOQGL .. 6 T- 28 VICTORIA N SALEM MA 01970 38 - 029 36 0155 0060 BRIDGE STREET MONTANA REALTY TRUST 37 WALTER ST 39 3C �;111 TR Zo 31 77 41 J,( 42 4 T3 • 32 $lh X�l'l� 13 Z4 34 'PlIppic"ric; • ;z 45 — JANINA SALEM MA 01970 6 35 — 36 0158 0007 BURNSIDE STREET 1/2 HILL WILLIAMS 254 SURRILL ST 36 hifIVI I A fQ-1K17A1 r'7 21-14MRSCOTT P14 QVR@R k07 48 37 301ai5 1 0 LOCHER,RRAM A ........ 0 PAUL'INE, R Z ......... .. 52 39 40 — SALEM MA 01.970 4 0 0 41 — 42 7 43 ol 7 ll -ll* 5 so ...... $0 l .............. I Er 52 0 0 53 — -1 0 54 2 5$ PE-TER- C R( 3 ' "' .CFj ; E SOR . . ...... �561 ro • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i i i a -- ,. B G INIO CO Og /s s ?g3? to e °9 H1 >9 r/ k s S 0 o D o s 641 /69 y 4 M s j s try�h� iv1� $G \" / SCy ON ?j)6 JPio z p /4S a Vo9E / 3q/ .. / ✓ S J�2A Ilk, s, • T 'o �` x323 v o /10 40 O �nyo / .9 ee mt ec 2 9� 90a /3� / '3y� /3g "3390 N, s� \L`J 0 90 B�/3Po lm �04�20 /09 c� °oo JPARKNG a) Il \d �a 4• r EE ?O v+'/v QD 6j F) �r 7 v n O 73-' 1 wee, v a Ln V SKERRY " k a STREET N COURT r � rn o 'L _ A - 0 c w E n -� I 3 P to o� SKERRY STREET COURT 0 � 0 3 J _ � � V C o d � r � b i C A a D �L R' W tom{ y' p p t y / � • 7/7 i 1 . r / / I ' L a t .. Ni f r } � f RIGHT - SIDE ELEV i _ I i 1 •11 i - 1IIli •� i i - t L LEFT SIDE ELEV 1 c DIY'• 1.0' y ��pµ. � r � � v��'� �� +FA z,y. `Ysrw Y `" 4.•.�� a -.¢ a qw�" s wW a.p..a�� It IL t I 1 I 1 1 V .'a _ --.... 1-7 1- I I JaAlAa SaW,,lSif J6�e 96s4? 4,44s C w1a�+2� �I1 'r000 i,.nc C h 1l ± liECK - Lj k•.L' r O^rPS , am i T t I w (�OS.eJ ^n��e '�e�nl I{ dl►�lll�9 ,o ( 1 I J \UI r I C Ud iII12/I II �dnd �iiK M r LOT AREA � b 2,400 S.� 71 dee :,Sgt PA RkIN 6 Z Ar I {„ ca e r SPACE 'r rgns 4rrr � {r°ir, � w.a, r lir to M. l� �sleslas Jane W �-- ��a.,a Ja��' c W �a��lMPNryuJ ct 1ct � Y F— O L, �le Y � 0 C.I �e cn to U cn M U I1� owner ISS cfne,l. ¢ EXISTING ISS �`' CUS '�°Q`la �°,3a ie� PROPOSED 14j Lo I 153 l�ffllllaM 'lu3^, L!-4/e/� I /dG GNJn�eJ 1 A' elrne pode,'!ck 4(«e ca�lll !`f 3 ol2S aJ/S yflee flck,41r fS� K� MoM f�/Iddon } 44 el BURNSIDE STREET 94 153 w 160 159 157 156 "r 158 � SALEM BOARD OF APPEALS APPROVAL 154 �n PROPOSED PLOT PLAN SKERRY STREET COURT 148 SALEM MASSACHUSETTS 47 o SCALE 1" = 10 SEPTEMBER 26 11989 ° PARSONS AND FAIA INC. ._. --- -- - ----- - -- _ - r m 146 W 150 151 152 " ` ' . 480 LINCOLN AVE. �; SAUGUS MASS. SKERRY STREET - Gi1TE ��O s 0 10 20 30 40 50 JllI r — —_ r_ .__. --- ---- - -- - - ------ - ---- 10 ---Io / N ' FLk r - �, L __ s Irl wK PN I I ' FlvsT FSR - -- _ _ __ _ _-- ' --- --. --- --- ------`------ ~ _ 1 1 L EAVM IMT, Owl WFlI. r1/ 6dNt ARM �, 1 4 / Jt.-C� '�yc�i?w? ... _ :..._7, - . p(� — /ASR C , v lf��. ± yS�S7 �tii ' . -: i - - ?}w�a er•7/�' i/y ,ti-- -, j RIGHT SIDE ELEV. REAR FSE Vi- 1 i(L-)N SCFxp '{�'s ' I �- ---- — - 3 Ile- SALEM CJOF,RD of A I E FpR FEdONT �rEv wti• i r �J7{ - . _ _ d' PPI►nL AP��'oJ.ot. 5!E P•tFG (ZFND@Q M Vol - - EL- - VA NS f ' I t . . - - ! Ski$RRY ST COURT ► ------ SALEM MASS Q L I - M EN6IHEERS } :I !N- off lUH)iRUI)iU:9 r1gryri4tK1 7 ti� / :`rih 'iQc 54i / p PA.i6SR PO BOX 86 E r �Q P6 wW 43 BRIDGE S1 i RAIfrCl1 SAEM• riiiSS 67378 U ' FT SIDE EI_E V __ - _ _ - __ KFS _._��_� � .3O.►2q �. ___ _ __ - S!9 794 6914 � �jt.y�r y`f'• t•n' r