The URL can be used to link to this page

0 NORTH PINE STREET - ZBA 1 0 North Pine Street R-2 John Spin ale a I i r---------.� __._ � � � � � � , �- (C'tu of idem, � ttssttdlusetts 4 e� �uttra Of �t�eal �r yoI 8y �F�x s�F� O"'c/F4Ss DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE FOR VARIANCES AT 0 NORTH PINE STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting to have the owner occupied condition be removed and the existing variance reaffirmed or, in the alternative a new variance to allow the continued use of the property to be used as a single family dwelling without the owner occupied condition. The property is located in the R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This building meets none of the zoning requirements as set forth in Table I or Art. VI, section 6-4 with respect to lot size, frontage, maximum lot coverage, front, rear or side setbacks. 2. The petitioner was granted a variance on September 29, 1982 conditioned on the maintenance of one (1) off street parking place on site and also conditioned on the owner's occupancy. 3. The petitioner requests a variance be granted without the owner occupied condition. 4. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar size and configuration and because of the unique structure, an historic carriage house that has been converted into a residence on the site. 5. There was no opposition to the petitioner' s application. 7 DEC SION ON ETITION OF HN D. SPINALE FORIVARIANCESHATP0 NORTH PINEOSTREET, SALEM A�'1S page two C7T CY0F . On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evR,Q �Sp selfed at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: AF/ICW S 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 4. Property can only be used as a single family residence. 5. One (1) off street parking space is to be maintained on site. Variances Granted August 17, 1994 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Chi of Salem, '-ttssttchuseitz a ' �nttra 4,?s peal r 4,... c7r o 84s C�FRR SA�FF F DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE JOHN BERTRAM HOUSE FOR A VARIANCE AT 29 WASHINGTON SQ.NO. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 after having been continued from May 18, 1994, June 15, 1994, and July 20, 1994. The following Board Members were present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman, Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the petitioners Counsel, Joseph Correnti, Esq. , the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to allow petitioner's request for a variance to allow the construction of an acoustical chiller in this Residential Two Family District to be withdrawn without prejudice. GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE August 17, 1994 Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. =' Tity of Satem, 'fflttssadjusetts FPattra of (Appeal keeom�.� _ 1 SEPTEMBER 13, 1994 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF AUGUST 25, 1994 THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO t GRANT THE PETITION OF JOHN SPINALE FOR VARIANCES TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED USE OF 0 NORTH PINE STREET AT A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. BOARD OF APPEAL BRENDA M. SUMRALL CLERK OF THE BOARD A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title. f Board of Appeal ofttiemttssttcljusetts q 3r4 nnrD of `Aupeul +v/ �FR�sq�F� 9y O,rF/F�`SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE FOR VARIANCES AT 0 NORTH PINE STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting to have the owner occupied condition be removed and the existing variance reaffirmed or, in the alternative a new variance to allow the continued use of the property to be used as a single family dwelling without the owner occupied condition. The property is located in the R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This building meets none of the zoning requirements as set forth in Table I or Art. VI, section 6-4 with respect to lot size, frontage, maximum lot coverage, front, rear or side setbacks. 2. The petitioner was granted a variance on September 29, 1982 conditioned on the maintenance of one (1) off street parking place on site and also conditioned on the owner's occupancy. 3. The petitioner requests a variance be granted without the owner occupied condition. 4. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar size and configuration and because of the unique structure,. an historic carriage house that has been converted into a residence on the site. 5. There was no opposition to the petitioner's application. DEC SION ON ETITION OF HN D. SPINALE FORIVARIANCESHATP0 NORTH PINEOSTREET, SALEM AUS 1S page two C/TOC- y On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the Cevid�GrQiVWseii[qqdd ed at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 4. Property can only be used as a single family residence. 5. One (1) off street parking space is to be maintained on site. Variances Granted August 17, 1994 ` "t-121 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal (fittl of -'�3ttlem, 4RUSSUChusetts `aQ ' nttra of r'1upeal 01,-k els 04eo 46 oFFr FaSs DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE JOHN BERTRAM HOUSE FOR A VARIANCE AT 29 WASHINGTON SQ.NO. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 after having been continued from May 18, 1994, June 15, 1994, and July 20, 1994. The following Board Members were present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman, Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the petitioners Counsel, Joseph Correnti, Esq. , the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to allow petitioner's request for a variance to allow the construction of an acoustical chiller in this Residential Two Family District to be withdrawn without prejudice. GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE August 17, 1994 Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. (Eitn of ttlem, � ttssrzcllusetts qU > Poarb of �Aufteal c �1S�yoF B4 6 40 9 oFF�FQss y DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE FOR VARIANCES AT 0 NORTH PINE STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting to have the owner occupied condition be removed and the existing variance reaffirmed or, in the alternative a new variance to allow the continued use of the property to be used as a single family dwelling without the owner occupied condition. The property is located in the R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This building meets none of the zoning requirements as set forth in Table I or Art. VI, section 6-4 with respect to lot size, frontage, maximum lot coverage, front, rear or side setbacks. 2. The petitioner was granted a variance on September 29, 1982 conditioned on the maintenance of one (1) off street parking place on site and also conditioned on the owner's occupancy. 3. The petitioner requests a variance be granted without the owner occupied condition. 4. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar size and configuration and because of the unique structure, an historic carriage house that has been converted into a residence on the site. 5. There was no opposition to the petitioner's application. f - - I FORDECISION ON VARIANCESHATPETITION OF 0 NORTH PINEOHN D. SPINALE STREET, SALEM 4 '1S page two 0/)- O, e . On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the 0evRd'P�i�fypryse?fed at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: FFj0�SS 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 4. Property can only be used as a single family residence. 5. One (1) off street parking space is to be maintained on site. Variances Granted August 17, 1994 (/` 1ro) Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal plitti of ttlem, Httssttcltusetts ja4 ' Pnttra of �upeal c4,?s 8 ro ys '9y c�FRK Sq�`rH, OFF,FASS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE JOHN BERTRAM HOUSE FOR A VARIANCE AT 29 WASHINGTON SQ.NO. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 after having been continued from May 18, 1994, June 15, 1994, and July 20, 1994. The following Board Members were present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman, Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the petitioners Counsel, Joseph Correnti, Esq. , the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to allow petitioner's request for a variance to allow the construction of an acoustical chiller in this Residential Two Family District to be withdrawn without prejudice. GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE August 17, 1994 Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. (City of ttlem, ttssttclju�etts q lJ x � (` 3oQ, $3aara of ,Aupea! cnyoB4 CF4,fi S'a'r��4S yy DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE FOR VARIANCES AT 0 NORTH PINE STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting to have the owner occupied condition be removed and the existing variance reaffirmed or, in the alternative a new variance to allow the continued use of the property to be used as a single family dwelling without the owner occupied condition. The property is located in the R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This building meets none of the zoning requirements as set forth in Table I or Art. VI, section 6-4 with respect to lot size, frontage, maximum lot coverage, front, rear or side setbacks. 2. The petitioner was granted a variance on September 29, 1982 conditioned on the maintenance of one (1) off street parking place on site and also conditioned on the owner's occupancy. 3. The petitioner requests a variance be granted without the owner occupied condition. 4. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar size and configuration and because of the unique structure, an historic carriage house that has been converted into a residence on the site. 5. There was no opposition to the petitioner's application. DECISION HPETITION O VARIANCES NORTH PINE HN D. SPINALE FORSTREET, SALEM ZS page two /Ty�F 8ysA4 �qqd On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on theCev�dPsi�(jgyp eseiited at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: FF/1045 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 4. Property can only be used as a single family residence. 5. One (1) off street parking space is to be maintained on site. Variances Granted August 17, 1994 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal (fitu of -'Ettiem, 'Massachusetts ia4 ' �Banra of Au}tenl 415 8 rQ ysey c�FRK S.goF� '®7 •9.� FjC�SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE JOHN BERTRAM HOUSE FOR A VARIANCE AT 29 WASHINGTON SQ.NO. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 after having been continued from May 18, 1994, June 15, 1994, and July 20, 1994. The following Board Members were present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman, Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the petitioners Counsel, Joseph Correnti, Esq. , the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to allow. petitioner's request for a variance to allow the construction of an acoustical chiller in this Residential Two Family District to be withdrawn without prejudice. GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE August 17, 1994 Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. (Citn of Salem, � ttssttrljusetts qG�, oarb of A eul c�Ty 1S 6 Q o of 46 lF,��sgoF� A. 9y DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE FOR VARIANCES AT 0 NORTH PINE STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts -General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting to have the owner occupied condition be removed and the existing variance reaffirmed or, in the alternative a new variance to allow the continued use of the property to be used as a single family dwelling without the owner occupied condition. The property is located in the R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This building meets none of the zoning requirements as set forth in Table I or Art. VI, section 6-4 with respect to lot size, frontage, maximum lot coverage, front, rear or side setbacks. 2. The petitioner was granted a variance on September 29, 1982 conditioned on the maintenance of one (1) off street parking place on site and also conditioned on the owner's occupancy. 3. The petitioner requests a variance be granted without the owner occupied condition. 4. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar size and configuration and because of the unique structure, an historic carriage house that has been converted into a residence on the site. 5. There was no opposition to the petitioner's application. / DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE Q FOR VARIANCES AT 0 NORTH PINE STREET, SALEM ' ZS page two y 8 cy of sQfl .gqdd On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the ev1,f4 tV ese�fLed at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: FFjKq 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 4. Property can only be used as a single family residence. 5. One (1) off street parking space is to be maintained on site. Variances Granted August 17, 1994 Nina V. Cohen, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Chi of Salem, 'Massachusetts `a s �nttra of �+ - enl 4,?s l 4 u..va 8�s n OF t V7FRKSLFy o. oFF/Fass DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE JOHN BERTRAM HOUSE FOR A VARIANCE AT 29 WASHINGTON SQ.NO. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held August 17, 1994 after having been continued from May 18, 1994, June 15, 1994, and July 20, 1994. The following Board Members were present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman, Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the petitioners Counsel, Joseph Correnti, Esq. , the Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to allow petitioner's request for a variance to allow the construction of an acoustical chiller in this Residential Two Family District to be withdrawn without prejudice. GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE August 17, 1994 Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. V DATE OF HEARING , PETITIONER J LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT ( SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND WITHDRAW SECOND CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE GARY M. BARRETT AI T_G_ STEPHEN O'GRADY STEPHEN TOUCHETTE NINA V. COHEN / ASSOCIATE MEMBERS / ARTHUR LEBRECQUE E� CONDITIONS: \zbaform\ '82 OCT -5 A 9 :37 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE CITY CL_' "S OFFICE RE A VARIANCE FOR 2A NORTH PINE STREET PAGE 2 September 29, 1982 1) All variances requested by the Petitioner to convert the existing carriage house to a single-farily dwelling are hereby granted. 2) The property may be used only as a single-family dwelling. L 3) This variance will terminate in the event that the property is not owner-occupied. In the event that an ocmer of the property ceases to use the property as his residence, the property may be used only as a garage. 4) All changes in the exterior of the structure must be approved by the / Salem Historical Commission. e S) One off-street parking space shall be maintained at the site. 6) Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancy prior to using the proposed dwelling unit. 7) Petitioner shall make all reasonable measures to change the street number at the property from "2A" to some other designation. 8) Petitioner shall comply with all applicable Fire. Safety Codes. Anthony M. Feeherry, Secret i y 1 SPLL Pc C.6T TO SE:"' 17 Cr THE SS. I ISDECIgIpN l➢ PLANS.. FL '. PEE*'.CTILrD' ITF ^I R 'PL \idING BOARD AND CITY CLERK 5 ._7 i.r i.`_ C:'I:B ;ECONJ OR IS UCORJEI) A2O ilOT6) O:; W_- 0..::E 3'S U-71FiC.%iZ G: ...LE. BOARD C% APPEAL 82 CCT -5 A 9 :37 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE CITY CL_' 1.'F. ;1F ICE RE A VARIANCE FOR 2A NORTH PINE STREET PAGE 2 ' September 29, 1982 1) A11 variances requested by the Petitioner to convert the existing carriage house to a single-family dwelling are hereby granted. 2) The property may be used only as a single-family dwelling. 3) This variance will terminate in the event that the property is not owner-occupied. In the event that an ocaner of the property ceases to use the property as his residence, the property may be used only as a garage. 4) All changes in the exterior of the structure must be approved by the / Salem Historical Commission. c 5) One off-street parking space shall be maintained at the site. 6) Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancy prior to using the proposed dwelling unit. 7) Petitioner shall make all reasonable measures to change the street number at the property from "2A" to some other designation. 8) Petitioner shall comply with all applicable Fire- Safety Codes. Anthony M. Feeherry, Secreelry ' LL cr " .-SI'.NT TO SE-:' 11 PF THE SS. jZS DECISION. 1D PLANS Ft 'r SEEA'cPILrD EIITF ^FE tPL \?vI?;G BOARD AND CITY CLERK •:. it ..;i <I .i .. T;.. !.._ :.. '. -.. ....... :� ° Z-0 _ . ECOi;J OR IS RLCOHJEi) XL) it Gi 6) O:; 'I❑E 0...:C3S BOARD OF APPEAL Pr_ r '82 OCT -5 A 9 :37 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE CITY CL_' �':�. ;;F;10E RE A VARIANCE FOR 2A NORTH PINE STREET PAGE 2 September 29, 1982 1) All variances requested by the Petitioner to convert the existing carriage house to a single-family dwelling are hereby granted. 2) The property may be used only as a single-family dwelling. 3) This variance will terminate in the event that the property is not owner-occupied. In the event that an mrner of the property ceases to use the property as his residence, the property may be used only as a garage. 4) All changes in the exterior of the structure must be approved by the / Salem Historical Commission. 5) One off-street parking space shall be maintained at the site. 6) Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancy prior to using the proposed dwelling unit. 7) Petitioner shall make all reasonable measures to change the street number at the property from "2A" to some other designation. 8) Petitioner shall comply with all applicable Fire.- Safety Codes. Anthony M. Feeherry, Secret i y FCZS' DECISIp� v➢ P,LANL EE F v`,r TO . :r 17 Cr THE SS. I E. l•,; ; ' .J S. FI. `E' B EP.__T_'f=r. :IITF -.:F...LPUA:,lNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK i'llc Cr=J:c i)F 71:E v... ..._-.'i. . . . .� ':1 ..J i• _ ,.._ I'... ill�-. ':._ , ,.__ . EC"NJ OR IS RL1CRDED AN: N7 iU) G:1 Ttl- S :TLE. DOARD GF APPEAL APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. �.� i (git>1 of %i>rm, �Mssttr�usEtts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: ` --ie Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain ,wcel of land located 10 • •O. • •� 'gr��t�• P. .r'e • • '� and said parcel is affected'S1sreet;. .Zonohg District. 12�.2— d by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;r -.7e Massachusetts State Building Code. =dans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. m N COO Sim J ±. Q V: O W .The:Application for FeWt was denied by:the:lnspector.-of Buildings for the fol•. reasons: -- 0'x Le_c.', The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the-s Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to � . approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessar�r*a;` hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-- ', gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: :_; -F^A'V QCvr .; A Ceti �vaacG we. -P'to fie"{• ) t S o b e c� ,rte 4*04 laces A 6-.L0e ti vie, .i +N,-e �� y Qr'j A0 A 2P_ '.I.o U} ti � i Z t . AL-jo Rewc '_� Ok'-- w .%N ALCcw ` tgQ,2 . S 1PCt ' -' ? A New Ow'.S (�P��•��,`"a e'ti. A S lG S 'Tk'° • Omer. . .,10� r.: . . SP. ..>n� .......:.. UA�.A.vc� toe �jnA.� �ecs wckl�e� T . . .. . . . .. .. ............ Address. � 1 Ca ..Y %.. . . Asir .SA�;;I Telephone. . . . . . .:?.t.5 0 .9.. . .. . .. .. .. .. Petitioner. . .�0�^ . .IP.,:.j.^.le... ... .. ... . fAddress. . . . . !. .(; meq >+,✓SV.s . . ' . . . .. ..... Date. . . . Telephone Telephone. . . . . ��.�. �•bo� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . �-kp . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =our weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The venina News. MORTGAGE SURVEY TO HERITAGE COOPERATIVE BANK rL Iu► IN I CERTIFY THAT TH IS LOCATED l AS SHOWN, -%,A0FJj � SALEA1AMSS_ RA«A EIDVwt � REM LANG SIRWYORS `�1D : 365 CHATHAM ST . L YAW MASS. CIS NOTES: POSSIBLE ENT OF OVERHANG AND BAY / DOW. WHEN OFFSETS ARE 1' OR LESS A FULL 3 /Y/INSTRUMENT SURVEY IS RECOMMENDED. Fr.sn T1s �Pr►re f en y wa/i lr/F iv/F' Bryson e " 6 /4 2' S . F. M Garage m 2 O /Y O .4 7-)--f /0 S T 'I_ ffnmr, CERTIFY 7v7hE BEST OF Nr A�147MLEDGE NOTE. THIS PLAN NAS PREPARED FROM A 7fLAr 771E AgOVrSES .SW W ON THIS PLAN ARE,wr LOCAT- TAPE SL/A�EY AND IS INTENDED FOR EO AI7NIN A .SPECIAL a0W HALIRO AREA AS 0EZIAEA7W MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONL Y. OFFSETS SHOW av r1F MR X CaWJKITY AW10" AWFAREV Br rW ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FFUBW EAERSS r NANASDENT A60WY a9 IT'S APPROXINATE ONL Y AND SHOULD NOT BE SLACESS9R9 &W 8/5/B% PMEZ S . zaW C- USED TO DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. I Fi rAsq CEATIFr 7mr THIS INSPECrlav AAS PER- FagVW IN ACCY171/AtE Ar7N PE '7EZWICAL STAAfO- Aw Fag Aougm6E Law rAwErrrLw' As A"7w 8), SCALE 1+= /o DATE T�/y S, / 9 9 4 7w mssAozw-T7S ASSQCIATICW OF LAAO SC!'iVE7A9S BOOK ioas3PAGE /0 9 CERT,f AAO CIVIL EASIAEZRS. THIS CE7ITIFICATIav OQES Avr maLOE mmm PALLS ,csC ag agIVENArS AS 77EYW AOT ALA'AYS IADICArE CONTROL A o "96 M. AWPE77Y LIMES ACL MrEZY. y_ e, (tlifg of Salem, c�ttssachusetts PDarb of ,�VpPal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 2A NORTH PINE STREET A hearing on this petition was held on September 29, 1982 with the following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs. Piemonte, Hacker, LaBrecque and Feeherry. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 2A North Pine Street to convert an existing carriage house garage into a single-family dwelling. A variance is required because the proposed conversion will violate, inter a�minimum lot area, lot width, lot coverage and area per dwelling requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1) Petitioners proposed single-family dwelling will have a minimal affect on traffic and parking in the area. 2) Petitioner's proposed conversion as modified by the restrictions stated in this opinion was supported by his abutters. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1) The property in question is unique because of its peculiar size and configuration, because of the unique structure on the site and because of the fact that there is no way that the property can be used for any use permitted as of right in an R-2 zone. 2) The conditions described above especially affect .he land and structure in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the land is located. 3) The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause the fallowing special hardship: unless a variance is granted, it will be virtually impossible to use the site for anything but a garage. 4) The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Appeal unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board granted a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms: i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN D. SPINALE RE A VARIANCE FOR 2A NORTH PINE STREET PAGE 2 September 29, 1982 1) All variances requested by the Petitioner to convert the existing carriage house to a single-family dwelling are hereby granted. 2) The property may be used only as a single-family dwelling. 3) This variance will terminate in the event that the property is not owner-occupied. In the event that an owner of the property ceases to use the property as his residence, the property may be used only as a garage. 4) All changes in the exterior of the structure must be approved by the Salem Historical Commission. 5) One off-street parking space Shall be maintained at the site. 6) Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancy prior to using the proposed dwelling unit. 7) Petitioner shall make all reasonable measures to change the street number at the property from "2A" to some other designation. 8) Petitioner shall comply with all applicable Fire Safety Codes. / r / Anthony M. Fee erry, Secr t ry A COPY ArF-° .I . .1DE�f3I'TON /kN➢ KLSA�IS 6HAVE..BEER EILESEF-WITH G�;PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK Cl- 'C9.'1 '.f T :_ vT -:a 17 R : J I 1 �r C ;'i ,`.ER OF 2EC.3VD OR G' RECOROEO A;;U N;20 OG i:l- G.::;_2^v CE?:i+:!C;.iE .. L+LE. _ DOARD OF APPEAL MAIN BRANC 200 eo PUBLIC _00✓_00 y IBRAR 2 1032 6645 .5. `ede e1e '000 �.\rl' 01 `ee iO 2 5ry 5 a `^219p 2cro0 �1A a00 0°• • e1e 5000 ° 3699 1116 °ry 9 0 I NIke K��PN�� V p 4J p � 1146 .e ��p i� •d o p b � •5 ,11. y ee 11 1� � � � p Gip � ► � e �p0 51 5 ee pV� 5 \\ayb Q .p ho \0 Iq s Ae �4J4E' S 51 >852 eta •' � � 2�9 2 e 2�f o C • /�y �°° e° 46g� IA � 8� Ss ,. 56g4 ' A `9e�9 O 0�\` ee° 4\'J"AA .. 5490 �° e ON „°► eee Z0AO '609 �4� o e � •s .� \ 00 VV q lb � 90ti ��l m 0 \ 5 5e FT o°e 5 �5 6 17,3j6 \'}J \'►�� ti eq. e 0 ' 600 A5 oma, •'° IW a39 005 II+5 8 ZAro b e g'o 2 L ,o "°e ►o w s0 h \ a X60 /h\L4.)� e pp`J GT \o��AA p SS °t• A 0 ►d, �5�'G .o �, 1 A3 0` s 1� li i me q. O r Dt �! e e bONO , �' , p S=S , 236 j° a. s�J \ h A_ ° " ir C{ Gni c� A i Z A r2i > .94500 m 320 a� a 190 34 w 5063 9 \. 1 I20 Y > r 9 1� °° 1 \60 A o2 , 119 ASO EET h FIRE ` iP 8cp srarlo 33 0 �" "° "� -A 33 5 r \ 60 440 ti A� " y1 p' ,• i APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. yc tIS1tV of �$H1Prit, 49nomijusetts % e epv=b of A LH' G DEPT. TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: JUL 11 S 12 All `5J he Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain arce] of land loc ted c 10. . .U. . raon�ti. rP:�'e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C;Y.,.ftreeff,L, Oning District. . . -. Z and said parcel is affected by Se-ctron-lsI•. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )f -ne Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. P Q W N�G _ O W �! W Cl � U The Application forret rasdenied by;the Inspeator-1of Buildings for the fol.. reasons: _ O�YLec- The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the-St Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessaryr hardship to`the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially deco gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for ,4-;,-- the following reasons: A+ 2egv+2eS QCyylpJ e. A Ca �o.A-or.l QIateS p 0 tR rte 14 w (Z2 w : .a c.+ _ t Q�,+`2 . S t -F ►3L AW p N:�'�u� - aP�ti ` AC1 ' V-S �'�C e..._i.5�-• � .}6.e 13 a+v.R o `�l^'L 1�2� + �I Owner. .,1J�! S� " .: . . . . .. . . ...... .�. . 1 )ov Address. . . . . . . . Co l�w.!� S !� he caw -rev` c5ccrJ+'� .. Telephone. . . . .``. ?.y S.-. . . . . .i: . . .. . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . .sl��y :4,1P . 'gle.. . . . . • •• • • Address. . . . . .71. .C.��J..•�3y.�. . .i?`.'2 Sq(Ey, ]ate. . . . � .I.�. J9. . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . �`�.$.' bol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . �kc.pt, R. 17, ;. -E54 . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `our weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The -venino News. Aix APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . CITY OF SALEAi' !3? -OF APPEAL ' Yj_ jy 745.9595 Ext..381 of 211.P.2It, ttS8ML 1iSE> S 'Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- .5 ested in the petition submitted by JOHN SPINALE T _—t ?!! @ N d'' k:' '^ :requesting owneroccupied condition removed and DIjZ� ��t7ttp414 ,J "'" DIr 1 . reaffirm existing variance,or a new variance allow- I TT ing carriage house to be used as single family dwell- 111 ing at 0 NORTH PINE ST.(R-2).Said hearing to AY , be held NEDNESD111 ,''AUGUST 171994 A , T 6:00 �' � � 12 of ; P-M.,'ONE SALEM GREEN, second Door. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE,'Chairman X15 are the owners of a certain-par,pja1 of land located August 3,10,1994 SN31252 1-t r.t.,�-i,FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�treet;sZon ing,Q�strict.P--.1- said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kd jCode. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. ,) m � <w - � ao cs y' 0 aCO ow The:Appltcation for Pet#lit,ras:denied by;the laapeetorof Buildings for the fol.. reasons: 'D`,vLec� )pPpent '. The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the-Sa Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to` ,,'.. .;: ' approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary+; hardship to. the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially deco- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: x �I�e ��k,oaG.z ASlcS �A � � aK � � . A�4 Qee- A Co+j O 'k c encm Ind V AK ra ce ti +; AV IMPS A c(tie, 40 (A 2e- .A . Com o ft s `t S Aw QZmvv v� , y .\` ALLcw tq%'2. . �p"0' �-+ce AS C It,a- �iec� _ � At,1p P:.�' t0 `�4^-�� `} 64 S LG S `T�r° �L , C� .}L.e 13c'o-v�0 `E �. (�p'E•a•.o ii Owner. - . .,14��!^! . . Sp' enie V AK%^"Ce_ toe C Tti_A -kecj wc�l c. i .......... . Address. 1j C� l�w.3 � S .. �. . ..... . -khe ` .. Telephone. . . . .``. .?.` S.— � v .%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . .s1U�! , '�' � '� Le.. . . . . . ... . r Address. . . . . ��. .C.��Jx!�✓ 1. . .{q 2 $'°�P�, Date. . . . �.I.�. J 9. . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . S�CIO.ti`G~� P l-t ��. �. .�a�{ . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four '.weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The cvenina News. �...y,v.- ��:�illi�iip��®rva��llgPa�� • 14101?TGA SURVEY TO HERITAGE COOPERATIVE BANK i7/ ��/ IN I CERTIFY THAT TH IS LOCATED rL/f/� l AS SHOWN. � %,AOF SALEM, MASS. R,«, c WKLA REM LAAO SLRVEY40RS "E1D u. 365 CHATHAM ST., L 1'Nl1( MASS. ( 22T NOTES: POSSIBLE ENT OF 1. OVERHANG AND BAY I DOW. V WHEN OFFSETS ARE I' OR LESS A FULL 3 /INSTRUMENT SURVEY IS RECOMMENDED. /Y F� mils eomefeny wd ii ,� _i7z sro.y w.o oC Bryson 're " 81.4 2' Ga�a9e t 2 O 1Y0 .47-N PYN.E sr •1 Awr, csv7.ry ro 7w BEsr of yr ^vxaw NOTE.' THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A 77N r 77E pRsvrsEs s wAw av mrs PUN AAIE mr Loci r- TAPE SURVEY AND IS INTENDED FOR EV XMW A sqEc7AL aow f z4w AREA AS aurNEA7w MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY, OFFSETS SHOW av 77E 7uP a= Car NM AP9 10" PREPARED Br 77E ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FEDSW ET r MAAUMMEWr AS9Vr a? rr'S APPROXIMATE ONLY AND SHOULD NOT SE 5XCVE=9s DATED V.V&% PANEL S , zaW o- . ' USED TO DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. I FIMAER CB?rrFY TMT THrS rAGFECrrav MAS PA7?- FM40 rN ACCOM44W M17N 77iF •TkMWrCAL SrAA®- SCALE S io OATE S, AWS Fa4 AtW7FASF Lata rAGPECrraAS D AS AOLF7 Br Y AV CC YAA pa�AssacrArlav cAnm nw BOOK iooS3PAGE lo? CERT.f FEACES X 97VVEENArS AS S77EY X Ao�A'SVM CArE CONTROL f /0 ?,0'- o -f 86 M. AR%OD?rr LIAES AXLRArar, y. C. NOR TGA GE�� SURVEY TO HERITAGE COOPERATIVE BANK r!_IY/� IN I CERTIFY THAT TH IS LOCATED AS SHOWN. 1NOFA% SALEM, MASS. RA«, WILLLAWM REID LAND RRVEYORS qEm) 365 CHATHAM ST., L Y N MASS. q�2W2 o N' C NOTES:! POSSIBLE ENT OF 1. OVERHANG AND BAY l DOW. `l WHEN OFFSETS ARE I' OR LESS A FULL /Y/INSTRUMENT SURVEY /S RECOMMENDED. F� snw�s �er»efei.Y Wa�� BrYson WX ,'fe " 8i4 S . F M ' Ga�aye 2 O /yo RTtI P/N.E" ST 091, 'I• /olmmr, csvrrFr To 7w BEsr army KXAEMW NOTE.' THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A THAT PE PREMISES &WW av THIS PLAN ARE NOT L=r- TAPE SURVEY ANO IS INTENDED FOR ED MITHIN A SPESIAL a0W HAZARD AREA AS DELINEATED MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. OFFSETS SHOWN av PE MAP Of LZiWNrrr APS fV" PREPARED Br T/E ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FMSW E,'WRF&CY MwA6£NENT ASSCY a9 rr s APPROXIMATE OK Y AND SHOULD NOT BE SWCESMW DATED 8/4/Ba PARR S . zave c USED TO DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. I cwThsR CERTIFY THAT TMS IAmpErrlav MAS PER- F49W O IN ACCa934ACCE MITH 77E 'rE0Wla4L SrAAm- AAos Fag AAa9 wr Caw IAmaEcrraw' AS AD PIM BY SCALE I '- Io DATE ,T'u 1, s-, 1794 AAV aMA A55LiCIATrav of[An0 srwvErays CETBOOK iOassPAGE /07 CERT.PF THIS cEaricroArrov xEs AOT rm wE awcas MALLS FSW7ES OR LRrVEMArS AS ThEY DO AOT ALA'AYS IAOICATE CONTROL " /0 99- 0!86 M. PROO:ERTY LIARS AL.L7 47MY. W. c. 6 . MORTGAGE SURVEY TO HERITAGE COOPERATIVE BANK PL IN I CERTIFY THAT TH IS LOCATED AS SHOWN. �jA0Fy�� SALE" MASS. PA„P, ALM REID LAND SIRWYORS REID 365 CHATNAN ST., L YM( MASS. ` 229 NOTES: POSSIBLE ENT OF 1' OVERHANG AND BAY 1 DOW. V WHEN OFFSETS ARE I' OR LESS A FULL 3 /INSTRUMENT SURVEY IS RECOMMENDED. /Y wa// - 2 HGF wo a oC B . yson fe " 6 6 S . F. M Garage In 2• O 1Y0A7-N P/N.E ST 'z, As awr, CERTIFY To rhE BEsr ar Mr A7WMLEDSE NOTE.• THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM A Tfil r 7w Al9<HISES SMTAW as THIS PUN ARE yr 4=r- TAPE SURVEY AND IS INTENDED FOR m MITHIN A SPECIAL r1= NAIARD AREA AS DELIAEATm MORTGAGE PURPOSES OM Y. OFFSETS SHOW OV TAE ANP a< CaWNITY AMM" Br 77E ON OR SCALED FROM THIS PLAN, ARE FEasm aEgsarr MIA 6&6E T ABEHCr as IT's APPROXIMATE ONL Y AND SHOULD NOT BE asa9s DATED B/�e� PAA�z S . ZaVE c USED TD DETERMINE PROPERTY LINES. I FLRTAEn CERTIFY Tm r THIS IASPECTIaV MAS PER- Fa9Um M ACCaMUCE MITE/ TAF '7Ec7NICA4 STAAo- AAw Fag Awnu6E Law Impwrro6l AS ADa°Tm Br SCALES =io DATE Tu/y S, 1994 77E MISSAQWAM TTS ASSWIAMW DF LAA® SWPE W Ano CIVIL aW.TAEEAS. BOOK100.53PAGE /09 CERT.f THIS CERTIFICATIav DaFs AOT IAlYCOE MALL.£ rs As AOT ALM CATE CONTROL f P 94- 041,86 M. PEACES a9 DRIVEMA 7tE'Y OD IAOI PM0677Y LIAES ACCLRITEZY. BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE. 7EyeX E .71 F_ 2 3 E L .............dtRT'lF;It6lI ABUTTERS MI., ................ ...... 3 4 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY# VIA P- 25 LOT: 0095 SUFF. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0000 NORTH PINE STREET 7 8 7 ........ ....... 9 .. .......... ............. .. ....... .......... 8 'N I .......... .........I`....... . . ........ 9 ....... ........... 400A.QqFgqFn- OW01-P 'Amnpr 10 -sq 3 :4 • 25 0095 0000 NORTH PINE STREET SPINALE JOHN D 71 COLUMBUS AVE is 0 :" 16 . . ......................- .............. ........ �A 0 :14 E, .... ..... KO Z LOWSK 1: J OH J"J R ........ ...... . 4 W?T STREET T 923 I, 2109 ONNA DANVERS, MA01, 6 8 1-12-Rl 04ARU'14, JENNIFER R SALEM MA 01970 zz :7 a 25 0090 802 0022 FOWLER STREET US RIVENSURGH LYNN M 22 FOWLER ST US 40 SAL 24 19 P N( STREET,. . TY!�`ITRUST." 260 20 .. ....- .......... 0 , , - 27 I q I........... ................... T AL 21 o S MARBLkH 22 ihw4ao,%..I.... .I. 01,E4 2ze 9 23 SALEM fl(A �x,9 300 24 25 0093 0004 NORTH PINE STREET BOWEN F RICHARD 15 DRIFTWOOD RD 31 94 3 2. 33 fo .. ..N `5�'009e4' Z0Q2'%% 14 ORITH: PINE' ST . ...... 25 ............... 34 R 26 ........... z • �F/E' -TRV-I` ............. I.I...I... 9�"I I,,�', ... ..... 35 i iLUL W -ENEDXC-T,, A,'�M AL I I 70' .......... 17 ....... ................. .......... .....- I I I I'll 1.1 -.1 11- .......... .........�'I 3 996"L-394 I '44,79A-94=4 'S;T'R -1.1.1............. -�I'D-R TAX—' 14IN tlXF:I 11.111,1�LAK�r-,--1" 6 28 37 29 DANVERS MA 01923 38 25 0097 0396 ESSEX STREET 1/2 FRIENDS CEMETERY 39 30 40 I'll F., ............ .......... 41 .............. 7:' ARSOR •ST ........ 3 . 4 2 4 HAN N I I I I I I I PAM ...... E RD Y 'PERR Y.'I& WEW A 33 ..... 41 • 1 2, 1 1 i ........................... 34 45 35 y SALEM MA 01970 46 25 0098 803 0396 ESSEX STREET U3 WALLACE ANY 3156A MERE POINT RD 47 36 48 I C ...... 37 49 ESSEX%'�S T REET ...... A ...11...............1 396:ESSEX�'ST I'-U4",: IERNEY-11VD1TH, ........• 38 50 • 51 ;7 52 IRE-El"i -q ..... 40 53 •41 BOSTON MA 02109 54 25 0104 802 0035 FLINT STREET U102 WADE REALTY TR/WADE JAMES F JR TR 75 SATE ST SUITE 2500 55 42 r/0 A Cp"MI il%f T AT I ONE/M EART F Rq ROqToN MA n9-InQ 561 43 ''S 0104803 , `0035 FLINT ........ . ......STU1Q3 S64 '6 "WEA THERCY, 'DR"I 57 -RE T. 4ARTV DAVIP1, $a 40 44 % ...... ALem 39 E 6, P A-7 70 45 60 46 61 •47 CARBONE DUANE F BEVERLY MA 01915 620 25 0104 805 0035 FLINT STREET U105 LEVY ERIC J 29 LANCASTER DR 63 48 FRANINea 11-1,11" 15 49 4� §Q6 ,,TU.,% 10&9 �%.I.I...........%, ,_, L�Ll SON%E E NEI 9 % FLINT REET E 1 Sf'EARF3E'LD LANE '',66 -% - , t�4 17LYNNFIfLNA 0194 Z 68 ......... 52 69 •53 70 54 2 • 55 .... .....% 777777777 'C m 75 ....... 56 H I EF 1 7 7 • BOARD OF ASSESSORS PAGE. 21--1 • CITY HALL. _____ ...... "T E, A "'07v TR Tl� ........ 3c. 4 • ............ 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: V'w LOT. OOT5 SUFF. • 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0000 NORTH PINE: S TREl T SED OWN a 7 F-P .""�, �,s j r.......... ......... ............. .... .......... ..... 'R ASSESSED,bWNER" ll-l"MATLINGil ADDRE 12 TO 13 : �4 ;i!@ 9494 996 gg;;!J F'6.!Pl;c STRU-.64 W496- et.t.tc,00H Rba&pff� E tmaiNE, N44MF f Pi A 1: ...... ... 77 bb,,�J F� iR' �1,%,1."I�I� ST, • 4 :3 .......... .......... TA MMd5 4104.:807 UNII r JONS`MC, PARTNERS .......... 19 • ........ 20 .'RT,'lj� ........... ...... 15 l3�l FI"T N 4. A IT T, Uj 16 21 SALEM MA 01970 22 • 25 0104 809 0035 FLINT STREET U109 SERAFINI J OFIN R PAINE AVENUE ✓ 23 ANGEL I NA m s CROS ,TNG 24 i5 0144"810 ...... .......... 25 INTr C; 9 9 --- l:"r 1,11:- .. E. 'iE:�H i R/,ELL'I5ONr. '? , 9 0 D 0 L $C)11 tj 0) 1.1 R A WAY, -00a5 . .R-........ ....... •2O CICS L: ............ ...... SAUoQS,., '2 27 ........... 'r • 21 281 e��W T t4 l&lT' 1.o, 29 22 WENHAM MA 01984 23 REVEREvMAotqwi5 • 9 w:5 0104 - RBE31 24 32 ............... �0"E 25 ....................... .... .. T3 i. 'Qj 0 4,r-,A�.1 .... Ft.:IV-T, AT"E -'Y 34 A E T, ......... ..� bb%t� jt . . . . . ........................ R ..........0,,tf •26 4 l x MA, 35 • ......... .. ...... ... 27 R x H 31 28 F1 'INT q- T-U T7 HURL! SUSAMA SALEM MA 01970 3a •29 25 0104 815 0035 FLINT STREET U201 HAWTHORNE 1 REALTY TRUST I FEDERAL ST SUITE 31 3 • 30 eFr1f:,k1- ON P.Appy r,*rAi T gc' DANVERS MA n19�Q 4 75 MATE 5'E # SGLi ............. 41 • 42 BOSTON MA;,Q^iQ9 43 • ......... .............% ........... ........ ............. yj, ............... 45 piO4 816 0435 FEINT STREET UGC �4 ll%x 1. 32 r"......... ............ 33 L�R X61, N T .................% : 44 34 BROWNE KAREN H LOUD0,NVILLE N Y I I 1 45 •35 4 25 0104 818 0035 FLINT STREET U2 0 4 CARBONE DUANE F 550 CAE,0T STREET 4 36 r rERI- V MA Q-19-15 48 .......... T7 Cj 'A' 'YEN F,,.' 49 5 - 8 Tq, �FLI ....... %%,,2.5 0-1 04:�l i 0 ..... ....... 38 . ........ in .......... �(jj 43 REAL 39 5 40 DICROCE ANTHONY F & DICROCE C A TRS LYNN MA 01903 53 • 4 41 0104 621 0035 FLINT STREET U207 DICROCE CHARLES (") BOX p .14.3 5 0 n 42 (5;(�1 :56 1. YNN A nign 43 .............j. .06 R. :ET 02 Tv, •44 s5 0104 :84. : F, N T 59 • .. ...... % 4 . w IT 60 46 KAN E PA,r R I C.I A A ETAL 'rRs MARBLEHEAD MA 019k5 61 •47 62 '25 0104 8'2 4 0035 FLINT STREET U,210 HAWTHORNE REALTY TRUST 7 FEDERAL ST SUITE 31 63 • 48 Pr rivl,t, P n.LG'- I DANVVR1.4, MA Q-1923 84 0 r 035, FLA N T, ST -c �s-rRmT ✓ 15 E, ARR,yr'�[jUN A YN c 66 A ... .. .I%I I I -'l, , % .1 • �E 0 ...... ........... .......r, • I I.I I I I I I I I'll....... 67 SALEM M A 0A%9-!C1 5 %.......... G US: L 1,% �e",,%, ,,, 5 5 1 681 .............. 52 •5370 7, 54 0 72 3 ...... 777 55 '�'PETER r.f.- 7 7 5 7J4 510 7 7 7 k BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PA ----- -7 . ............ ..................... ........... A .......... ...... 3 1,F, I TT I E 4 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP: LOT 0095 SUFF 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0000 NORTH PINE STREET 7 ] MMit I �1 11 .......... ...... .. ..............I:.........;111............ 12 10 —————- 13 oil J 010 . 81-16 00' FLINT STREET V302 LLISON GiEOc10 RGE H SR 9BROADW300 AY # 14 3151 1 2 r E 'I Gk IS MA 0-1 9t'j6-V:wm, 6 3 1, -- 17 N N T ST% 3W. I, ..................... 4 �'2 W4� ':$/7 Q S1 1111111.1:�I.11........... 1 18 %........I ��I I""%","I., AI F X0,N E I- I , - b,At ZAS �T 19 15 'q P P PT• Z Q44 R.Al HANOI,` 1 9 K.- II-loyMA 20 • 16 21 17 STEVENS-BRACHANOW BARBARA SALEM MA 01970 2210 is 2.5 0.134 0001 NORTH PINE STREET 3 POTTERY REALTY TRUST 101 LOWELL ST ✓ 23 24 19 .......... 25 26 20, 03, 941 Ec ITRE 1 1 .................... 27 21 ....................... .......... ...... ............... ......... 04 clom. �Tp'" W TODD 22 29 23 SALEM MA 01970 300 25 0664 803 CJ394 ESSEX STREET U3 RUNCE. SILAS HV09011 111 304 ESSEX ST U4. 31 24 Al mA nig-m 32 25 ...... ............4 Al TW_ R ............ c I U I lz� I 11, 11-1 1 1 1 26 .............. ....... 35 ............ .......... 27 IJAJOI ITH RO r_+DY ..... ............. .... ... ...... 36 28 37 29 3 3: 30 40 31 ...... 41 • ................ 32 .........I . . e... ................. ....... 442 33 . I. .II. .II II I II I .I.I 3 34 45 035 4 47 36 48 37 ..... I,�..... 49 5 38 0 • 51 39 40 53 41 54 • 55 42 56 43 .......I .I...I..I I ,I..........I, �....... F7 .......... .. .....e", 58 ........... ....... 41 59 45 ............. 60 46 61 •47 :2 3 48 64 49 • 1 71........ 65 50 67 51 1 52 60 0 53 70 71 54 1721 7-, 55 73 74 ESSUM A S 75 0 6 04 m a U O9 //29 V 9 21Z m � u � � ao � '� N �� •rP a W 9 �, 90 F o W va c9 69 ` o s a o%s �d- p� s re •L� b 41 - 4 tl25 {IB OIB 41{ 412 "1�yQ 0 4Oe ? �i� c� � \ • � � e J STREET 413 O°I 44 9 -"i �I 411.813 4o8 ` 9 Q _ 9'I'FZ�9 Zl6 Z 0 ae JJ q3E;MD t'y3e53 !O34 {oi z m w 0 p-3 ei . 4•e ��y m \ N / o .. �n`'o a O(p • r�1p. .'86 °e � 4 ''° y� p�Zy �\l`9s . ��, O f o O "' ".i 9?�4 s °. , 0 04LfQ ' O DOD y.0 _ oos oCpJ o $Alp ob r / ❑� 6 .? � �� .oe � �s�'g Ja a /l% (� p �_ j �+ s'OL� �' 4`` •° < v o s `�/}/, /\j \Q A '0 4 d• a $59 q o'° f.4 u• � �� 'O/ of °S 0 G SL Je a 91�K m o�m J°o 0 s' O ] J �� Q_ / J•4 O cc 1.11 s/ d�° �/� a, � pz 1• d°o aK 3 '+J 61 W V' m J•> sJqO a J• /G� s • • ns " / J•e CC o� pr i i, qt' _ s � O �, �� }• 3 0., N%A N e f a \ s,o s,s ��`, �m�y s >j1s N cyG9CF ,•� ° e° m m co L' + y•4• L u N o > u � irN 4 mn 2 4L s oN D QO c 5 • >s� a J N m J}a his' 11''� s tilt • s �. s N re mN oa