Loading...
7 WINTER STREET - ZBA 7 WINTER STREET C' 1 �, -�� '� � � a � � � �� -� � � � 1 5'7 Legal Notice CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 978-745.9595,Ext 381 will hold a public hearing for all per- sons interested in the petition submit- ted by SEVEN WINTER STREET, LCC,requesting Variances from use to allow 8 residential units,to allow two principal buildings on one lot, relief from minimum lot area per dwelling i and number of stories for proposed addition and a Special Permit to I extend an already non-conforming , structure for the property located at 7 I WINTER STREET R-2.Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY;MAY 21,2003, at 6:30 P.M., 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3rd FLOOR. Nina Cohen,Chairman ' (5/7,14) .¢o r CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTSn i BOARD OF APPEAL CITY U' c�nLLh I � CLERK'S OFFICE 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR s SALEM, MA 01970 TEL. (978) 745-9595 : GT- FAX (978) 740-9846 1007 JUL 22 A 10: 45 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. MAYOR DECISION OF THE PETITION OF WINTER STREET LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 WINTER STREET R-2 A hearing on this petition was held July 16„ 2003, with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Stephen Harris, Richard Dionne, Joseph Barbeau and Bonnie Belair. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Variance from use to allow 6 residential units, to allow two principal building on one lot, relief from minimum lot are per dwelling and number of stories for proposed addition and s Special Permit to extend an already non-conforming structure for the property located at 7 Winter Street located in a R-2 zone. The provisions the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to the request for a Special Permit is section 5-3 0), which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extent expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, Building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the of the Ordinance DECISION OF THE PETITION OF WINTER STREET LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 WINTER STREET R-2 page two The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after reviewing the plans makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner Winter Street LLC is a Massachusetts corporation that owns and operates a local business known as The Inn at Seven Winter Street. Petitioner and the principal Dee Cote were represented at the hearing by Attorney George Atkins and by Dan Pierce, architect and designer for the project. 2. Petitioner presented a plan to convert the existing bed and breakfast to a six-unit condominium. The plan utilizes the existing Second Empire Victorian residence and grounds, and add a two story carriage house and two three-story additions, each of which would be designed and constructed is a is a historically- appropriate style. Two parking places for each of the six units would be provided in an off-street lot at the rear of the property. Each two-bedroom unit would be greater than 1500 of its size. 3. In support of the conversion, Mr. Atkins argued that condominium owners have a greater interest in maintaining properties than do renters, and that the condominium form of ownership can ensure capital repairs are performed on a regular basis since the owners are on site. Basic maintenance, trash and snow removal are functions normally performed for the condominium owners as a part of the service paid for by the condo fees. He further argued that the residential use is less than a commercial use. Finally he noted that because the project involves six units, it would undergo site plan review by the Planning Board prior to construction,thus ensuring a close review of the layout of the traffic flow, services and other nuts and bolts of the development. 4. Architect Dan Pierce presented the project plan. He noted that five units would be created in the main building, including one unit entirely on the first floor and four two-story units in the in the house and additions. The plan calls for the retention of all existing Victorian design features within and without the house, which with the high ceilings and expansive room size, are a marketing asset to the development. Most of the existing trees will be saved to preserve the grounds. Early city plans show the property previously had a carriage house on the grounds and the proposed two-story building will fit in with the scale of the houses toward the rear of the property. 5. Speaking in support of the proposed plans were abutters John Wright, 5 Winter St., Hannah Dozzi, 20 Pleasant St. and Dick Dunham 131 Bridge St. and neighbors Joe Schoke of 16 Pleasant St., Jean Garakan 4 Parker Court, Paul Guido 15 Pleasant St. and Mary Manning of 14 Winter Street. Proponents argued that the plan would improve both the property and the street, which was currently undergoing a renaissance that it would create housing to meet the needs of smaller families and older empty-nesters, that it would ensure the property would be well maintained and that they felt comfortable that Mr. Cote would build it well. 6. Opposed to the petitioner's plan were Kathleen Ward Atchason, 26 Winter St., Thea Grace Morgan; 11 Winger St. Jeffery Barrows, 14 Gregory St Marblehead, Stephen Cummings of 20 Winter St., Jean Charanago, 18 Winter St., Marc and Marlene Schaaedle of 135 Bridge Street and Robert Ciociola and Janice Martin, new owners of 11 Winter St. Opponents expressed opposition to the increased , y PETITION OF WINTER STREET LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 WINTER STREET R-2 page two parking difficulties on Bridge Street and to the reduced size of the dwelling units, which the argued, guaranteed a more transient resident than the existing residential homes. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Inspector. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing Structure. 6. Petition shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 7. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering for the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board of Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF WINTER STREET LLC REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 WINTER STREET R2 page three Special Permit & Variance Granted July 16, 2003 A /�J Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal HANNAH DIOZZI 20 PLEASANT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978) 741-1154 May 18, 2003 Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal. City of Salem Salem,Massachusetts Dear Ms. Cohen and members of the Board: I am a direct abutter to the rear of the property at 7 Winter Street, which will be considered by the Board on May 21 for conversion to condominium use. I would like to be recorded in favor of this project. I have no problem with the number of units proposed, and it is my opinion from viewing the plans that this will provide aesthetic and,most likely, economic enhancement to the neighborhood. Yours very truly, Hannah Diozzi July 15, 2003 City of Salem Board of Appeals 120 Washington St., 3rd Floor Salem, MA 01970 To whom it may concern: We may not be able to attend the meeting scheduled for July 16,2003, so we are writing to express our strong opposition to converting the inn at 7 Winter St., Salem, into condos. We just returned from Cape May, N.J.,which has a large, beautifully preserved Victorian historic district. It was sad to return to Salem and be reminded of how much it has lost in comparison, from fire, economic hardship, and developers. The developer of 7 Winter Street says his work is of high quality, but his plans would undermine the grand legacy of Winter Street's original builders. The proposed condo conversion would further the loss of historic mansions in a city that relies on them for tourism(e.g., Christmas in Salem). Even more important is the quality of life for those of us who live and work in Salem. We benefit from others' preservation efforts, and we have a responsibility ourselves to be stewards of Salem's irreplaceable historic properties. Condo developments attract transient single people and childless couples. We lived in a condo ourselves when we were in that stage of life, so we are not against condos. We are simply against destroying a scarce treasure, losing green space, and decreasing the city's diversity, tax base, and consumer base by driving wealthy.families away. We would like to see 7 Winter Street become a single-family or two-family home. Urban planners often write about the benefits of families: they put down roots, they often invest heavily in their houses (in general, much more than condo owners do), and they have children who bring vitality to the streets and help elderly neighbors. This is not a question of whether condos are good or bad but of whether they are good for Winter Street. Historic houses and neighborhoods are scarce resources; condos are not. The developer has questioned how many people can afford large historic houses, but old houses have become very popular. Owners of 19`h-century houses on Winter Street have invested over a million dollars in renovations in the last year alone, restoring historic features and improving comfort. In comparison, investment by condo owners on Winter Street appears to be minimal. Recently,a house on Winter Street that is historically intact sold for$625,000 within 24 hours—further evidence that the destruction of historic houses is unnecessary whether one's primary interest is making a profit or building strong communities. Sincerely, Susan and Stephen Cummings 20 Winter St., Salem To: The Salem Zoning Board RE: Proposed Condominium Conversion of 7 Winter Street 120 Washington St. Salem,MA 01970 Dear Members of the Board, I am the owner of The Joseph Story House, 26 Winter Street, on the corner of Winter Street facing Salem Common. I am apprised of Mr. Cote's plans regarding the Inn at 7 Winter Street. As the owner of a National Registered Historic Landmark in the Museum District of Salem Massachusetts, I am adamantly opposed to the conversion of such a historic property into condos in such close proximity to my home. My own house was built by the Founder of Harvard Law School. Joseph Story is also referred to as being the 'Father of American Jurisprudence'. Many of Story's furnishings and writings, as well as his son, William Wetmore Story's paintings, are now preserved by the Peabody-Essex Museum. It was Story's translation of the American Constitution into American Law that brought such singular attention to his life here in Salem. Many historic dignitaries, Presidents Monroe, Madison, the Marquis de Lafayette, John Quincy Adams, Nathaniel Hawthorne, to name a few, have enjoyed the architectural integrity of Winter Street and Salem homes throughout the generations. For the sake of historic preservation alone, no more condominium conversions should be allowed in the Museum District of Salem. As it stands, more and more investors are now in the area seeking entire homes in order to reconvert them back to their original integrity. As recently as ten months ago, my newest neighbors took over the large, antiquated Federal mansion beside me in order to restore it and live in it. I see no need to change this trend now. Since then, two more houses have sold on Winter Street to people who are restoring them to single family status. If Mr. Cote is allowed to gat the historic structure and divide it into nine condos, that act alone is irreversible. Irrevocable damage will be done. For example, I have fifteen McIntyre fireplaces in my home. I am told I could make a fortune removing them from the house and auctioning them off through Sotheby's or Christy's on the international market. While I can easily do that for the money, the historic integrity of a unique historic Salem house would be damaged permanently. Mr. Cote will be facing a similar situation when his contractors go in and gut his building in order to rearrange the internal structure to accommodate a multitude of condos. There are an abundance of condos in Salem as it is. A glut. Salem is in clear and present danger of losing its community-minded, neighborhood families as well as forfeiting its historic atmosphere should a few more dominoes tilt the scales. A once beautiful,cultural, historic, family-oriented town is becoming an "inner city" by many standards, and I forsee that H this countertrend is allowed, we will soon be overrun with traffic,serious crime,confusion,transients,and gross indifference. (It's happening already because of various political factions at work behind the scenes on Capitol Hill, who should be stopped). As it stands, to preserve the unique integrity of our Museum District should be our first consideration. I know that Mr. Cote has done some wonderful things in the Salem area. Maybe he could tarn his attention to an area in Salem that really needs restructuring, razing, overhauling, beautifying and bringing up to code. Anything within the Museum District Zone is strictly off-limits with regard to razing, restructuring, and overhauling. The Museum District needs TLC, restoration and renewal. We mast take on the role of `Keepers of the Flame' with regard to our historic legacy. While I personally cannot be present tonight (I was present at two other meetings that were postponed), I wish my will to be known with regard to 7 Winter Street and the area in general. I care enough to hire an attorney to represent my intentions,Kneed be. I appreciate your attention in this matter. Best Regards, Kathleen Ward-Atchason � THE JOSEPH STORY HOUSE 26 Winter Street Salem,MA 01970 2 Thea C, raee Morgavi, ii wi. wter stveet , saLevu oi970 c J July 10, 2001,,-14 The Salem Zoning Board RE: Proposed zoning variances on 7 Winter Street mill l � o 120 Washington Street _ -Mo Salem, MA 01970 > ca '� i Dear Zoning Board of Appeals: I am the present owner of 11 Winter Street, right next to the property at 7 Winter Street. After Mr. Cote unveiled his plans to convert the Inn at Seven Winter Street to condos, I sold my house and will be moving at the end of August. I hope my opinions may still be considered in this matter. The new owners may or may not be at the meeting since the closing will not occur until the end of August. I know they intend to keep the approximately 5000 ft2 house as a single-family residence, and to continue to invest to preserve its architectural integrity. I have the following observations and opinions: 1. Winter Street has a chance to truly fulfill its potential as a second magnificent Chestnut Street, worthy of national notice. Winter Street is the crown jewel of the newly- christened "museum district' and should be preserved, not chopped into condos. 2. The historic nature of the structure makes condominium conversion a bad choice, since it can never be reversed. As an inn the structure could one day still be a grand home. If it were apartments, it could be converted back. If it became a two-family home, or even a three-family, it could still return to its former elegance. As condos, that could never be the case. Condo conversion is the only course of action—aside from razing the structure—that is completely irrevocable. 3. Mr. Cote maintained at the community meeting in May that the only way to maintain the structure is to turn it into condos. I disagree. Two-family conversion, not requiring a variance, would also preserve the structure, with much less density. 4. Three other houses sold recently to owners who are fixing them up and preserving them as single-family homes. It seems a clear trend in the neighborhood, and one I think the city would do well to encourage. T r a e e M o r g a w 11 wiwtev street , .Salem oiy ,- o 5. There are abundant condos in the city of Salem—why bring coals to Newcastle? By contrast, single family homes of distinction are rare. We might even say they are endangered, if this complex goes in. There is a risk of a domino effect with other properties on the street. 6. The proposed carriage house will eliminate a valuable area of green space that could be a lovely garden. Such space is precious on a street where density is already high. 7. Lastly, the size of the complex seems excessive, and will definitely create lots more activity and noise very close to my house. There are, as I understand it, four additional doors in and out of the property. This will create a hive of activity where today there is only occasional coming and going by guests of the inn. Mr. Cote (again, at the community meeting) maintained that he had attempted to sell the property last year, and that no one was interested in buying. I know he didn't have any buyers at the asking price of$1.5 or$1.2 million, but perhaps he was asking a bit much considering he never removed the unsightly scaffolding—which has been affixed to the front for almost 16 months despite the fact that no work is being done—nor did he fix the inn's peeling paint and generally dilapidated appearance. My house, priced correctly for the market and in premium condition, sold in under a day for full asking price. A half-house condo on Federal Street recently sold for over$550,000 with an additional $700 per month condo fee for upkeep. I believe Mr. Cote could do limited improvements to the existing structure and sell it for well over$1 million as a two-family or as two condos. I know that Mr. Cote has done some successful developments in the Salem area. Perhaps he can tum his talents to a more modest plan that will serve the needs of the community as well as his own needs, without destroying a valuable piece of history. Thank you for your time in consideration of these opinions. Sincerely, iIII Thea Grace Morgan D. L. COTE 3 Parker Court Salem,MA 01970 978 740-9120 May 22,2003 Board of Appeals Nina Cohen Dear Mrs.Cohen, Please accept these letters from neighbors in support of our 7 Winter Street renovations.They had been given to me to bring to the May 21 meeting. Please hold them for the June 18 meeting we hope to attend. Thank you, D.L.Cote To: The Salem Board of Appeals Re: The petition of 7 Winter Street -1= From: John H. Wright 5 Winter Street r �' Date: July 14, 2003 a I have lived in the same house at 5 Winter Street, to the left of the Inn at Seven Winter Street, for 55 years and have watched the demographics and architectural changes along the street with much interest. Although the structures were and are solid, they were.really not appreciated for their asthetic qualities until quite recently, and then by new owners who often chose avant garde paint colors and augmented them with colorful and lush window boxes. I remember years ago hearing that Winter Street was the first runner-up to Chestnut Street in Salem, and that is even more so now! The first significant restoration of a property was #7 about 17 years ago, several years after Dee Cote's mother, Sally Flint, acquired the 1870s Second Empire mansion. It had been pillaged of its architectural character, especially around the fenestration, and was clad in dazzling white vinyl siding for about 25 years—a large amorphous hulk. When Sally, Dee, and later his wife Jill, decided to turn the house into a bed-and-breakfast I was overjoyed, especially after seeing the plans for the exterior. Being a good neighbor, and knowing of my involvement on the Salem Redevelopment Authority's Design Review Board for 10 years, Dee sought my advice on the choice of colors for the building, and 1, in turn, designed the Inn's sign. Having the Inn be a non-smoking facility, with "no pets allowed" pleased me even further. Now, some 15 years later the owners of the Inn at Seven Winter Street would like to move on with their lives and convert the bed- and-breakfast into codominiums and build a carriage house on the grounds. The property was recently put on the market for slightly over a million dollars, and then taken off. A developer of historic properties, Dee Cote, would like to make the best ad- vantage of the house and its large combination parking lot and garden, and what developer would not want to do the same? As I am a primary abutter, Dee and his very talented architect, Dan Pierce, met initially with me to go over the plans for convert- s A. ing the house into condominiums and for building the aforemen- tioned carriage house. After looking very carefully at the detailed drawings I became very concerned about the height and length of the proposed addition to the rear of the existing house. As presented, the addition would affect my small garden, which I established over 30 years ago, by blocking out much of the southern light and sunshine. Dee and Dan not only revised the plans to lower the roof line but changed the length of the propos- ed addition from 30 to 16 feet, so that the light and sun problem would be somewhat alleviated. They also listened when 1 told them that the proposed carriage house would be too close to the rear of my property and relocated it several feet away in both directions. Dee Cote has recently completed a handsome restoration at the foot of Turner Street across from the House of the Seven Gables, and a few years ago converted the apartment house at 3 Winter Street, to the left of my residence, into 4 condominiums with parking for at least 6-8 vehicles. Regarding the property under discussion at 7 Winter Street, I know that many residents on both sides of the street (who by the way own single-family homes) are not in favor of this two- part project for several reasons—probably already discussed— such as maintaining the authenticity of single family homes, density, parking, and knowing that if any architectural changes are to be made to their own property that they would have to seek approval from six (6) condominium owners, probably a formidable task! Ideally, I would also prefer the large house to remain as it is, but I would be willing to go along with the plan for the addition as I think it would "finish off" the back of the building architecturally, and according to the plan it relates perfectly to the front section. I would suggest that if the plan for the addition is approved. that the plan for the carriage house be submitted when the previous work is completed so that all neighbors and interested parties see how it fits into the next phase of the project. I think this can be done with minimal change to the landscape plans, although I am sure Dee Cote and associates would prefer that both structures and the conforming landscape be integrated and worked on concurrently. Knowing Dee Cote and his neighborly family for many years, the quality of his work, plus his great enthusiasm for the project with Dan Pierce's thoughtful plans, I therefore present these remarks. Respectfully submitted, Joef,�� Jon Wr' { j � Ms. Nina Cohen Board of Appeals Salem, MA 01970 May 20, 2003 Dear Ms. Cohen, 1 own the property at 14 Winter Street, which is diagonally across the street from 7 Winter Street. I also own, and reside in, the property at 16 Oliver St., which backs directly to 14 Winter. I have lived in my house for over 50 years, and I have, therefore, watched the changes in the neighborhood on both streets for a long time. I am writing in order that I be put on record with the Board of Appeals in support of Mr. Dee Cote's proposal to change the use of his property at 7 Winter Street from the current use as a bed and breakfast,The Inn at Seven Winter Street,to residential use. I have spoken with Mr. Cote in detail regarding his plans for his property, including the remodeling involved,the landscaping , and the parking, and I feel strongly that his plans are good for the property, the street, and the neighborhood. All work that Mr. Cote has done to his property at 7 Winter St. to date has been of high quality, and has been performed with the least disruption possible to the neighborhood. I have full expectation that any future work he will do will be consistent with that level of both quality and consideration. I feel saddened somewhat that he feels it necessary to close The Inn. However, I feel that the plan he has settled upon for change is one that will allow for 7 Winter St. to contimue to add to both the ambiance and the appearance of the neighborhood, while providing residence possibilities for new neighbors. I am unable to attend the Board's meeting,however, I would be glad to answer questions or provide more information as necessary. Thank you for your attention. Sin ere Mary anni t May 19, 2003 Joseph B. Schork Jean M. Schork 16 Pleasant Street Salem,MA 01970 City of Salem Board of Appeals Nina Cohen, Chairperson 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 To Whom It May Concern: Having gone over the condominium plans for the Inn at 7 Winter Street, we have no objections. We feel that this would be the best alternative to the Inn. Having condo owners, instead of renters, will hopefully mean that the property will be maintained, as in pride of ownership. Since?/ Schor�k 3 Josep Jean M. Schork Memorandum To: Nina Cohen(Salem Zoning Board) From: Marc and Marlene Schaedle, 135 Bridge St Date: 6/25/2003 Re: D.L.Cote proposed condominium development To the Salem Zoning Board, We would like to state our firm opposition to any proposed development that exceeds the standard limits on housing density in the neighborhood and on our block in particular. The impact on water and sewage resources,parking,and traffic congestion of any outsized condominium construction is obviously not a positive one for the neighborhood,and one that we do not welcome. As residents of the neighborhood for over ten years,we are also dismayed by the plan to build units so small that they will only appeal to transient residents who generally have little stake in the long- term interests of the neighborhood. i Thank you for the chance to express our views,and the work you do to preserve the livability of Salem neighborhoods. Sincerely, Marc Sc� [haaeddl��e. 7�."U. e- Marlene Schaedle � a C4 � S1 iA-(b- S� _e,m r hIo�n_C�._b_usi-n-ess–i_n p U���aSeci q, o m e, Qn—IRS e;^ C41. I Z� I5 0 Small I_ Sccz ucleJ n-ei on Dr ,va S CC-1ba Z v m — �C.v-i-�_�—` � n,3_6- I� COsm_a�r-tcJp ocSS o- n � en-c--1_�Q u rn_ olalr ,� I h1_e_o� ose-j eonj_om _ i G1_lou� S_e Number o_ �orneoWness to Qeco_r -o-ur - - o__o U_r g Us' tyro Un_Ci i nqS' OSS W e_�_�Ce S_I_n_C-rc C)_G-u_r rte-P �II 1q�� fS ncp� e1, v�{ou_ny� 2enc_a��,_ d-ow e-1-�l �j-i t r ron_ eS �O�4 I_2s�) M CJ_� ` .Lop T —we-C _�om_e _ 1 - ca,> o w, J s _ , _ . . ; , , May 12, 2003 City of Salem Board of Appeals, Nina Cohen 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Variance application at 7 Winter Street Dear Board of Appeals: I own the property at 17 Winter St, 2 Pickman St and 3 Pickman St and am in receipt of the legal notice requesting relief from the R 2 zoning at 7 Winter St. Since I will be unable to attend the Board of Appeals hearing on 5/21/03, be advised that I am opposed to any variance being granted for that property. Presently there are far too many residencies in that area and an increase in density will cause more traffic congestion, parking difficulties, people, dogs, etc. It is zoned R 2 and you should not allow any further increase in density. Sincerely, Yrey Barrows 14 Gregory Street Marblehead, MA 01945 781/631-1312 i 44'-6" 394"BUILDING HEIGHT i � I I i cJIIy`� p 10 m �'� �2y �� :�� pig mi= 0° `� € b =1 -010 O x m a -0 m cnlM dog 8 8 zix Z G,i0_ -4 - -„- o 11 Cn Cn 0 v \ I m --- - m m - 0 - - O z Tm mX _ Nz iz OG) 31 M — U m � --1 C - - - - �r C❑ EXISTING- PROPOSED 1 STORY NEW 2 STORY ADDITION SIDE ADDITION map v DNo — 0S!Cn -4w _ Z{ E-1_ C - tm- >�o gg N ONO Hamm L �— ZX { El gh PROPOSED NEW 2-1/2 STORY REAR ADDITION 35'-0"BUILDING HEIGHT Project No:No: 0201.2�Scale: 1/8"=1'-O" Date: 24 April 20031/8"=1'-O" Date: 24 April 2003 Reference Drawing: Drawing No.: CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION Proposed Additions to Existing Structure 7 WINTER STREET Salem, MA SOUTH ELEVATION A-2 PIERCE ARCHITECTS 214 Derby Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Tel: 978.745.3330 Fax: 978.745.3376 PLEASAN T S TR �Q EET MAP 35 LOT 63 ANNE M. BACCARI 18 PLEASANT ST. MAP 36 LOT 439 JOSEPH B. SCHORK JEAN M. SCHORK 16 PLEASANT ST. \ „ MAP 35 LOT 64 CRESENE NORLOCK 1 PARKER CT. \. - MAP 35 LOT 62 `F � _ HANNAH S. DIOZZI 20 PLEASANT ST. MAP 36 LOT 450 PAUL J. CARRO ; 2 PARKER CT. 0 5251534"E I - 310 19.10 `10•45E rootl fence a--a—°_°J MAP 35 LOT 61 Y 50.80• RICHARD E. SAVICKEY MAP 35 LOT 65 1a1 22 PLEASANT ST. •,� a le.p• „v. Q DEE COTE ® 1 r .five, vim., v 3 PARKER CT. 1a.o e j l © CL o !! minimum m o 19.p' 'C . \ i it Q :\: setback Z m a p4• MAP 35 LOT 66 2' 0a o JEANNE M. GARRAHAN 4 PARKER CT. proposed a (1'i'I il 94.18 o 19.0- Parking to JJII S28-0712 'E minimum setback MAP 36 LOT 449 \ II a o e I z DAVE DUNHAM EASEMENT v n ry 131 BRIDGE ST. wootl fence —c—al !`' \+ a oposea O oto —°- 8 9.0 to proposed parking 32.0• d 90 9.0' 63:46 9 '�0ir,Z.r2nSTORt(G N �� �• o ° N BUILDING F r 9.d MAP 35 LOT 49 F N 24.o c MARC SCHAEDLE 15 z1.3' 1z.o 0 135 BRIDGE ST. I N a MAP 35 LOT 54 moo. MAP 35 LOT 55 C' = THEA GRACE MORGAN = a MAP 35 LOT 52 I $ 11 WINTER ST. 3 WINTER STREET pAREA = 17,72 S.F. CONDOMINIUM N N2224'46'W proposed steps 12.0' I 16.4' MAP 35 LOT 53 21.5 3 I JOHN WRIGHT 21/2 story Wahl 15.6• 11. �---'.^fit •• .. to proposed 3 story addition exlounq slope, (2 new stories above F { W decks to be I 17.3' existing one story). �: '••--[y I z s n removed oi I • sting steps, ,. I ` re oved c fire es fire escape 9 c I I 1 m r: V i 41 w 2.3 A0 77. tin _ N21'44'47'W WINTER STREET PROPOSED �k 0 F blAs89SITE PLAN cy GAIL. 7 WINTER STREET SMiTH y No..35043 y SALEM 3500- PREPARED FOR IIAL LANG R ) ,�� SEVEN WINTER STREET, LLC �ssfp/AL LASJQ 1 _ SCALE 1" = 20' APRIL 15, 2003 NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION 47 LINDEN ST. — SALEM, MA (978) 744-4800 #1448 1