The URL can be used to link to this page

4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD - ZBA (2) 4 Winter, 1;land' Road R-1 ( Margaret Rizzotti c� CT r of �ajem, � ttssrzclluse##s s 33nttrb of �u{rettl 4 2 ..11 V ( it f{.Ss DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCE AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances to divide the existing lot into two lots; Lot 1 containing the single family dwelling will contain approximately 6,112 sq.ft. ; Lot 2 will contain approximately 1,578 sq.ft. and is situated at the tip of the property. Lot 2 will be an unbuildable lot with the existing shade trees and vegetation remaining. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request, an abutter spoke in favor. 2. The petitioner and her late husband purchased the property in 1969 and the petitioner still lives there. 3. Petitioner has paid taxes on entire property since it was purchased. 4. When petitioner tried to sell in 1989 it was discovered that a portion DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCES AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD, SALEM page two BL Al of the property referred to as lot 2 above and as lotr;h6 on p an Sub�jjted had a clouded title, i .e. owners other than herself.. `:` >- ;t^ 5. Petitioner lost the prospective 1989 sale as she was unable to transfer clear and marketable title to the entire lot. 6. Petitioner has incurred substantial financial hardship in trying to clear the title to this portion of the land shown as lot 16 on the plan submitted to the Board and as lot 2 on schedule A of petitioner's request. 7. Petitioner would be required to go through lengthy and costly land court procedure to clear the title of this portion of the property if this variance is not granted, causing her additional hardship. 8. The lot referred to as Lot 16 on the plans submitted will not be a buildable lot. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. The petitioner shall obtain approval from the City of Salem Planning Board. 3. The lot referred to as lot 16 on the plans submitted and as lot 2 in schedule A attached to the application, shall not be a buildable lot. No structure may be placed on said lot. 4. The present and future owners of lots referred to as lots 12-15 on the plan submitted and as lot 1 on schedule A attached to the application shall continue to maintain said lot 16 on the plan submitted. George A. Ahmed, Secretary Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCE AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD, SALEM page three Oct y 51 r ° j VARIANCE GRANTED September 15, 1993 `'yS A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Chi of �ttlem, ��ttsstttlluse##s f. ? -Boura of �'�u}retll 011 y Z ^:.SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCE AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances to divide the existing lot into two lots; Lot 1 containing the single family dwelling will contain approximately 6,112 sq.ft. ; Lot 2 will contain approximately 1,578 sq.ft. and is situated at the tip of the property. Lot 2 will be an unbuildable lot with the existing shade trees and vegetation remaining. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request, an abutter spoke in favor. 2. The petitioner and her late husband purchased the property in 1969 and the petitioner still lives there. 3. Petitioner has paid taxes on entire property since it was purchased. 4. When petitioner tried to sell in 1989 it was discovered that a portion 1 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCES AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD, SALEM page two _ �' .4 < of the property referred to as lot 2 above and as lotJ-Cl. on p an s'ubn,jted had a clouded title, i.e. owners other than herself. 5. Petitioner lost the prospective 1989 sale as she was unable to 'transfer clear and marketable title to the entire lot. 6. Petitioner has incurred substantial financial hardship in trying to clear the title to this portion of the land shown as lot 16 on the plan submitted to the Board and as lot 2 on schedule A of petitioners request. 7. Petitioner would be required to go through lengthy and costly land court procedure to clear the title of this portion of the property if this variance is not granted, causing her additional hardship. 8. The lot referred to as Lot 16 on the plans submitted will not be a buildable lot. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. The petitioner shall obtain approval from the City of Salem Planning Board. 3. The lot referred to as lot 16 on the plans submitted and as lot 2 in schedule A attached to the application, shall not be a buildable lot. No structure may be placed on said lot. 4. The present and future owners of lots referred to as lots 12-15 on the plan submitted and as lot 1 on schedule A attached to the application shall continue to maintain said lot 16 on the plan submitted. George A. Ahmed, Secretary Board of Appeal J DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCE AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD, SALEM page three OCT y c ; 2 51 VARIANCE GRANTED September 15, 1993 cs A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal f (Eitn of -Z§ttlem, � Httssttcljusetts -Sattrb of Au{�enl OCT 4' 2 Sl ' J : r N-SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCE AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances to divide the existing lot into two lots; Lot 1 containing the single family dwelling will contain approximately 6,112 sq.ft. ; Lot 2 will contain approximately 1,578 sq.ft. and is situated at the tip of the property. Lot 2 will be an unbuildable lot with the existing shade trees and vegetation remaining. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request, an abutter spoke in favor. 2. The petitioner and her late husband purchased the property in 1969 and the petitioner still lives there. 3. Petitioner has paid taxes on entire property since it was purchased. 4. When petitioner tried to sell in 1989 it was discovered that a portion r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCES AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD, SALEM page two &7 a/ 1 a� of the property referred to as lot 2 above and as to m;h6. on p -U an dabmyjted had a clouded title, i.e. owners other than herself. 5. Petitioner lost the prospective 1989 sale as she was unable to transfer clear and marketable title to the entire lot. 6. Petitioner has incurred substantial financial hardship in trying to clear the title to this portion of the land shown as lot 16 on the plan submitted to the Board and as lot 2 on schedule A of petitioner's request. 7. Petitioner would be required to go through lengthy and costly land court procedure to clear the title of this portion of the property if this variance is not granted, causing her additional hardship. 8. The lot referred to as Lot 16 on the plans submitted will not be a buildable lot. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. The petitioner shall obtain approval from the City of Salem Planning Board. 3. The lot referred to as lot 16 on the plans submitted and as lot 2 in schedule A attached to the application, shall not be a buildable lot. No structure may be placed on said lot. 4. The present and future owners of lots referred to as lots 12-15 on the plan submitted and as lot 1 on schedule A attached to the application shall continue to maintain said lot 16 on the plan submitted. George A. Ahmed, Secretary Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR VARIANCE AT 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD, SALEM page three OCT y si F" VARIANCE GRANTED September 15, 1993 S A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n^�b tlZit� of -'�5ttlem, rTussadjusetts J �S �BpMTa of � Cal October 7, 1993 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF OCTOBER 4, 1993 THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF MARGARET RIZZOTTI FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW 4 WINTER ISLAND ROAD TO BE DIVIDED INTO TO LOTS, ONE LOT (THE LOT WITH THE DWELLING ON IT) TO CONTAIN APPROX. 6,112 SQ.FT. , THE 2ND LOT (WHICH WILL REMAIN AN UNBUILDABLE LOT) WILL CONTAIN APPROX. 1,578 SQ.FT. (R-1) BOARD OF APPEAL BRENDA M. SUMRALL CLERK OF THE BOARD A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title. Board of Appeal APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . +eta T. a (9TtV of �$ttlera, Aassar4use#ts . 9 � � <; r Puurh of jApleal CO. 1. TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located j at NO. . 4•winter ��s�}�p� �tq��. . .. .. .... .. ,Street; Zoning District. .Ba . . . ... .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. ... . .. . . : apk�s�Rtt«paayaerkxi�RReatra� suiec�cesuusuxxxxxxxxxx ekxtdie4ascsaghftse#;rs�c�#�ti�l�di Lodes Plans describjng the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in tc:wrdaRe with Section IX A.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. LU Rrect'4pgl C) 0 >w iu w� m LL co > r c> ca - n Co -71� n g '-n >. (n Lo N e •. The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: i l Direct Appeal. i The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed; as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: see.Schedule A, attached i Owner..k1v&vPX. nxxP.W... ...... .. . ... . ... .: 4 Winter Island Road Address... SirA1974:: .:. .. ... .. ..: . .. c/o John R. Serafini, Sr. Telephone.... . .i5P8). 746-0212. .... . . .. ... . .. Petitioner. . MpFron-1.1zf ;ml. . .. .. . .. . . .. .. c/o John R. Serafini, Sr. Address... . . ... . ... . . .. . . . Date. . . August. 19..1993. . . . Salem, MA 01970 Tel hoonne.. , (Qpp), 744,0212 y. - :.c� .. . ...c ,. .. . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of . .4ppeals with a check, 'for advertising in the amount of..M.75. . .... . .. . . . . .... . +four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. SCHEDULE A The Petitioner is the owner of the property located at + 4 Winter Island Road, consisting of a single family cape cod style home on approximately 7,700 square feet of land. The subject property is in an R-1 District. The Petitioner wishes to divide the existing lot into two lots as follows: Lot No. 1 with the existing house, containing approximately 6,500 square feet, and Lot No. 2, containing approximately 1,200 square feet and situated at the tip of the property of this triangular shaped lot. The proposed division of the lots is shown on the plan submitted with this application. The proposed Lot No. 1 .would be over 5, 000 square feet and exceed 50 feet of frontage. The proposed Lot 2 would be an unbuildable lot with the existing shade trees and vegetation remaining. It is submitted that the size of the proposed Lot No. 1 with dwelling will be in keeping with the existing buildings and lot sizes in the neighborhood. There is a compelling need by the Petitioner to divide this property. After the death of her husband, the Petitioner has become increasingly burdened by the care and upkeep of her single family home. In 1989, when a purchase and sale for the subject property was signed with a prospective buyer, it was discovered that there was a cloud on the record title to that portion of the property now designated as proposed Lot No. 2. As a result, the agreement to purchase was not consummated and the sale was lost. The Petitioner has been advised that unless she is able to clear this title problem, which would only affect proposed Lot 2, the subject property does not have clear and marketable title. Petitioner is again attempting to sell the property and the granting of this petition will serve to clarify issues which will be raised by the prospective Buyers. These issues arise from a unique series of events in the chain of title to the property as more particularly set forth below. The subject lot is comprised of five (5) parcels which are presently held in common ownership by the Petitioner. It is the parcel which is on the tip of the property, herein designated as proposed Lot 2, furthermost from the house, in which the petitioner apparently only has a two-thirds ownership interest. When this property was conveyed to the Petitioner in 1969, she believed she had a one hundred percent (100%) ownership interest. The Petitioner has paid real estate taxes for the entire property for the past twenty-four years. The title defect was finally discovered in 1989 by the prospective Buyer of the property when his lender performed a title examination. 1 It is submitted that the proposed creation of Lot No. 2 will not change the existing building or use of the property, nor will it substantially alter the existing character of the neighborhood. The Petitioner has landscaped that portion of the lot during the entire twenty-four years of ownership, and the Petitioner intends that the proposed Lot No. 2 will continue to be used as a side yard in conjunction with proposed Lot No. 1. Lot No. 2 is not intended to be used for any building, and the Petitioner agrees that Lot No. 2 in an unbuildable lot and that such a restriction be a condition of approval of this Petition. To not allow the Petitioner to divide her property, given the background of the situation and the size of the adjacent neighborhood lots, would seem to be unusually stringent, and would cause the Petitioner to suffer a substantial hardship, both financial and otherwise. The alternative correction to the title would be to go through the Land Court, a process which would be prohibitively costly to the Petitioner, who has already suffered a severe financial hardship by losing one sale and being unable to sell her. property prior to the economic downturn in the local real estate market. Therefore, the Petitioner respectfully requests variances from the density requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for the purpose of dividing her existing lot so as to allow proposed Lot No. 1 and the dwelling thereon as shown on the attached plans. t 1 i i F 2 is -ATE OF :=EARIIG s 9 V \ PETITIONER i_OCATIOii '40TION: TO GRANT SECOND TO DENY SECOND iO RE—HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND 70 CONTINUE SECOND POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE—HEAR CONTINUE DI STEPHEN O'GRAD �/ 'GEORGE A. AHMED / FRANCIS GREALISH (/ �D ii�rni�Kr STE2HFN T(�[—�� ASSOC-.= ::EMBERS ARTHUR LABRECOUE CONDITIONS: ajo 5 6 APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . • a ditg of A2llent, CQU5.621c4usetts b Paurb of 'Appeal TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . 4,Winter. jpj#g¢,gq#4 • . .Street; Zoning District. .$.1 . . . ... .. .. . . . . . .. .. ... . .. . .. . ... k" t1�?paaKxksRf�a�tred �i�sn(� sssxxxxxxxxxxxn e&xtd3massaekuae�:tsxlo�t�c$mi��dd�yc�odoc Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. l of the Zoning Ordinance. Fbireeu Appeal. co h }w m� cts Y^ The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: j'. Direct Appeal. i. The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed; as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: see.Schedule A, attached I. r Owner. .Av&vex. Riz.zpxtf.. . . . .... .. . . . . .:. ..i 4 Winter Island Road Address.. . gal.ep..M N. . O)970. . ... .. .. .. . .. . . c/o John R. Serafini, Sr. Telephone... . ..(5A9). 744-;Q?12. ........ .... .. Petitioner. .M�x��F�x.Ri��vtti . . .. .. ... . . ..... c/o John R. Serafini, Sr. Address. .... .. . . .. . . . .... . Date. . . August. 19.. 1993. . ., Salem, MA 01970Tel hone.. , (508), 744-0212_.. . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of .,Appeals with a check, ' for advertising in the amount of..M.75. . .... . . . . . . . .. ... ifour weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The . :Evening News. v 6 go � 9 � l AO aJ� y n 19 — J ejO ne • PSE O s� ��,` 3 y 9q 6160 okc`� <<Y% S O a e e Oqo `• ,9 \� FT PJEov 61 \a3 s '6 9j 0 91pp Z ?9 gA 12I +, Sao Q\�P /� 6p 60 \AZ 9 ab J O 8 r o'�p •` Nf �/ \ 5 \ 'b ql X06P� e Ali 161.e � p(. tJ • go IS F G ' \ IJ jR °n \�100 7 I 146 138it M 8.7 AC-FLATS ' i' JFPS Cp 9y b -1100 cp J 4p xt 20 L5AC-S ®J / 19 /TAC / / t342 P / / 268 gy 27 P��P / 306 '" 20600 22 �_ 28 13 BOAT / 1 ° C�' 3347.9 / 1 _ �' 23 255 $ loe-e le,500 x o 8969 YARDy' / 7500 3000 « ,Lpa 70d ^ � I_ / ` 21/2 q 31 30 0 3600 6695- 3260 i 11 c I I'SLAND 54 / < a °o eo 3004 a ,5 �a 29 l2y + epi (( 1—�6l--��^ ,.. 6[) '� 10 xu 35 a 24 6900 R� �I 35 34 eo 3 Tejo i A �..�-. 3060 �/�❑ X60 \ M 950-5 X jJ 1 \ k k / I x SM / TN I j 36 -Ir / I 23 6A / //�\ p POOL I A / I HOME ME F FOR P(1V4 WINTER lS/ R-62 \�/O 1 R.(SET PK(SET) - L` 6g46 L By - �fSfT LOT 16 f � r C AREA = 1,578 +/- S.F. o 'R(SE T) 2p. 17.8 31.7 �r� R.(SET) w N 63 31 63 / 13' 6 O LR.(SET) \ 31.9 #4 89 pEOk AREA��6,1 2 S.F. +/TS 12 5 6 \ K�,c4p 9.I 3 0 wN 63 120 00 ` \ ASSESSOR'S MAP 44 LOT 36 '30./Y TRUSTEES OF PLUMMER FARM SCHOOL A BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE. ......... 2 3 .......... 4 • 4 5 • 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 44 LOT: 0035 SUFE: 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0004 WINTER ISLAND ROAD fQ 9 7 ........ ""I I It ... I ....... ... ............. .......... ........... Itt FnN RI"Y Ab 13 14o :2 44 0035 0004 WINTER ISLAND ROAD RIZZOTTI MARGARET A 4 WINTER ISLAND RD 5 16 17 U MARY, 8-,,, t 14 9."I,I I " ISL-, I ................ ....... ........ .. .... ............ 19 I970t- 13, ........ 10 20 .......... I .......... I 21 17 PECEVICH ANN SALEM MA 01970 22 • 44 0021 0011 WINTER ISLAND ROAD CRANDALL DORIS F 29 14INTER ISLAND RD 23 Ile z 24 ........... 'b .......... 2610 20 ;....... ...... SL, ......... T .......SAIII MA, 0 ...... .. .......... ............ .... .. 27 E ....... ...... It, 21 111...... , " I ....... ....... 26 4"7 Uw�u w 141t.1% 1-�L. 22 Rb 29 23 SALEM MA 01970 300 24 44 0032 0024 14INTER ISLAND ROAD CONWAY JOHN 8 25 WINTER ISLAND ROAD 31 v 32 5 ............. .......... 33 2 44'1 ",'t ........... It, 34 • ISLAND 111"I'l.......... .. . ............. ........ 26 .............. -35• ...................... ZA) ...... ................. . .... .........I.... ....... 27 1......... .................... 6 ze 37 29 LEBOEUF PATRICIA J DANVERS MA 01923 380 44 0036 0037 WINTER ISLAND ROAD TRS OF PLUMMER FARM SCHOOL 37 WINTER ISLAND ROAD 39 30 40 1777777777� ...... ........... ............... It......................... ........... ...... 7, 41 32 1 It...... 420 .......... 7110E 43 , 44 ............. 33� 45 35 460 47 36 48 t 37 ............... 49 It It . ...... 50 38 ......... ....."I I"I I I I e',. • 'It 51 39, ........ ... t I I t... ........ 1111-1-:51 ............ 40 53 41 54 'm 55 z 42 56 43= ........... ........ 77777�� F7 C '59 ............ 45 't ............. 60 46 61 •47 :2 3 48 64 It 66 67 • 49 85 Ilt • 50 8 .............. 52 69 •53 700 71 54 72 55 73 74 'It PETeW, A PON ...I... 75 F02 4 cL ]w Cp L MOUS � J < o 1 ,o c 1 SAC£. M HH2802 N J a LOCKS MAP - SCALE. I"=800' NTER W I .Ts <,q�R_ 6 2 O u O : P.K.(SET) PLAN REFERENCES - I.R.(SET C , - -PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, PROPERTY OF EST. OF MARGARET T. 6845 �qe9 ?k GRIFFIN, SCALE 1 '= 20 ', MARCH 2, 1958, ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE, (Sc- 47 FEDERAL STREET, SALEM. ' RECORDED AT ESSEX SOUTH T� REGISTRY OF DEEDS AS PLAN 231/1968. -'PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, SCALE 1 '= 50 ', FEB. 24, 1967, ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE, 275 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, PETITIONER. PLUMMER HOME FOR BOYS, INC. . ' RECORDED AT ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN PLAN BOOK 113, PLAN 21. LOT 16 �r �e<lcl \ -'PLAN OF HOUSE LOTS OWNED BY D.A. SWAIN ON MINTER ISLAND, AREA = 1, 578 +/- S.F. 0 2p. SALEM, MASS., SCALE 25 FEET TO AN INCH, SEPT. 1896. ' I.R.(SE T) > , 17. 8 *14'0 RECORED IN ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN RECORD BOOK 2095 31.7 F/ PAGE END. X16• 9' ry S 63. Oo•, 10 . \3� NOTES: / LOCUS IS SHOWN AS LOT 35 ON CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S MAP 44. 1 /O LOT 16 IS SHOWN AS A SEPARATE LOT ON 'PLAN OF HOUSE LOTS 63 R ' 3 '63• 176 OWNED BY D.A. SWAIN ON WINTER ISLAND, SALEM, MASS., SEPT. APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION 13 �O CONTROL LAN IS NOT REQUIRED. 30 1896. ' BUT WAS COMBINED KITH LOTS 12-15 ON 'PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, PROPERTY OF EST. OF MARGARET T. GRIFFIN, MARCH 2, W 1968'. SALEM PLANNING BOARD _ LR. (SET) 319 LOT 16 IS NOT A BUILDING LOT. # 4 8.9 /R SEC LOTS 12 - 15 k AREA = 6, 112 +/- S.F. \ 9.1 \ ,3 0 \ oo i o ASSESSOR'S NAP 44 LOT 34 l 12 L LAWRENCE L. LeBOEUF 63.`13 00• co 12 j DEED IREFERENCE 5563/217 `3�4 \ ASSESSOR'S MAP 44 LOT 36 W TRUSTEES OF PLUMMER FARM SCHOOL --y ��tHOFMASS4 Cy GAIL GNF }� L. a I V ` o I SMITH N No.35043 0 90FF9FGLST�P�OQ,�i PLAN OF LAND SS��NAL LAND SJ FO R REGISTRY USE ONLY IN SALEM PROPERTY OF MARGARET A . RIZZOTTI I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE RULES SCALE 1 '= 10' AUGUST 23, 1993 AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS. NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION 1 INCH = 10 FEET 209 WASHINGTON STREET - SALEM, MA. 10 0 10 20 #841 A Ufu�c Fo2� 0y C roc�ne�r y Cm L £ N n LOCUS �y w fN JP c^ 9� to 5Ac£ M H,9/Z 602 2 a LOCUS MAP SCALE. I"=800' WINTER l s<q R-- 62.00 �O P.K.(SET) - I.R.(SET PLAN REFERENCES:- 'PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, PROPERTY OF EST. OF MARGARET T. 0845 iq Bq pK GRIFFIN, SCALE 1 '= 20 ', MARCH 2, 1968, ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE, (SFl/ 47 FEDERAL STRET EASALEM. w RECORDED AT ESSEX SOUTH REGI11968. -'PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, SCALE 16= 50', FEB. 24, 1967, ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE, 275 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, PETITIONER: PLUMMER HOME FOR BOYS, INC. . ' RECORDED AT ESSEX SOUTH Go6e REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN PLAN BOOK 113, PLAN 21. LOT 16 -'PLAN OF HOUSE LOTS OWNED BY D.A. SWAIN ON MINTER ISLAND, AREA = 1, 578 +/- S.F. 0 2p. SALEM, MASS., SCALE 25 FEET TO AN INCH, SEPT. 1896. ' I.R.(SE T) > 17. 8 yI RECOAED IN ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN RECORD BOOK 2095 co ry"� 31.7 PAGE END. 'y SJ, 1y ? p. X16 ''9• n° S J. v fps dp NOTES: / LOCUS IS SHOWN AS LOT 35 ON CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S MAP 44. R 63. 31'63' 176 LOT 16 IS SHOWN AS A SEPARATE LOT ON 'PLAN OF HOUSE LOTS APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION '13• O OWNED BY D.A. SWAIN ON WINTER ISLAND, SALEM, MASS., SEPT. CONTROL LAN IS NOT REQUIRED. '300 �O 1896. ' BUT WAS COMBINED KITH LOTS 12-15 ON 'PLAN OF LAND W IN SALEM, PROPERTY OF EST. OF MARGARET T. GRIFFIN, MARCH 2, SALEM PLANNING BOARD ` 1R (SET ) 319 19680 .LOT 16 IS NOTA BUILDING LOT. # 4 8.9 /R Dec AREA LOTS 6. 112 +/5 S.F. (FD/ 4� 9.1 3 o � a 11 o ASSESSOR'S MAP 44 LOT 34 i N 12 ti LANRENCE L. LeBOEUF \ 69• p Co12 WINTER ISLAND ROAD Op. DEED REFERENCE 5563/217 ASSESSOR'S MAP 44 LOT 36 W TRUSTEES OF PLUMMER FARM SCHOOL t c GAIL yG. N0.350430 c y F F�STE�� PLAN OF LAND FO R REGISTRY 'JSE ONLY FSSONA�LANOSJQ IN SALEM PROPERTY OF MARGARET A . RIZZOTTI I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE RULES SCALE: 1'= 10' AUGUST 23, 1993 AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS. NORTH SHORE S[JRVEY CORPORATION 1 INCH = 10 FEET 209 WASHINGTON STREET - SALEM, MA. 10 0 10 20 a 1841 A Ur„ut Fo2� 4- co, LoCU5 iz� ftiL P q4. ✓ l`. F(� 9fU yvp t — 1 4 -� yAcEH Hfi280z ti m N i 2 a LOCL13 MAP ---- - S C A LF I"=800' WINTER IPK (SET) - PLAN REFERENCES: .R.(SE7 -PLAN OF LAND IN 69 46 'e4 GRIFFIN. SCALE 1 '= SALEM,'.MARCH2. 1968. ESSEX PROPERTY OF EST. FSURVEY RSERVICE, FTS 47 FEDERAL STREET, SALEM. ff RECORDED AT ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS AS PLAN 231/1968. -'PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM. SCALE 1 '= 50 ', FEB. 24, 1967, ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE, 275 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, PETITIONER. PLUMMER HOME FOR BOYS, INC. . ' RECORDED AT ESSEX SOUTH LOT 16 �� \ GoOe<lc REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN PLAN BOOK 113, PLAN 21. AREA = 1, 578 +/- S.F. -'PLAN OF HOUSE LOTS OWNED BY D.A. SWAIN ON MINTER ISLAND, \ �'O• SALEM, MASS., SCALE 25 FEET TO AN INCH, SEPT. 1896. R (SET) ^o , 7. 8 y1 RECORED IN ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN RECORD BOOK 2095 31.7 �F� PAGE END. h, LR.(SET) Ips 'do„ / �30• F . � NOTES: LOCUS IS SHOWN AS LOT 35 ON CITY OF SALEM ASSESSOR'S MAP 44. R 63° 31'63• A LOT 16 IS SHOWN AS A SEPARATE LOT ON 'PLAN OF HOUSE LOTS APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION '13. 176 IO OWNED BY D.A. SWAIN ON WINTER ISLAND, SALEM, MASS., SEPT. CONTROL LAW IS NOT REQUIRED. '3o" 1896. ' BUT WAS COMBINED WITH LOTS 12-15 ON 'PLAN OF LAND 4O W \ IN SALEM, PROPERTY OF EST. OF MARGARET T. GRIFFIN, MARCH 2, SALEM PLANNING BOARD _ LR (SET) 319 19680 . LOT 16 IS NOTA BUILDING LOT. 8.9 �� OECk AREA 6, 112 12 112 +%5 S.F. (F�� 6/<�yFgO 91 3 0 h~ ' R o ASSESSOR'S MAP 44 LOT 34 N 12p LAWRENCE L. LeBOFUF 63, 3 12� DEEDINTER ISLAND ROAD co REFERENCE 5563/217 \ O V ASSESSOR'S MAP 44 LOT 36 W TRUSTEES OF PLUMMER FARM SCHOOL i GAILL. �s F Y i 's 9 No.35043o a� °�F FCsPLAN OF LAND TEPE Q,� FOR REGISTR1SE ONLr is o I I IN SALEM PROPERTY OF i MARGARET A . RIZZOTTI I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE RULES SCALE 1 '= 10 ' AUGUST 23, 1993 AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS. NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION 1 INCH = 10 FEET 10 0 10 20 209 WASHINGTON STREET - SALEM, MA. � � � � � #841