Loading...
34 WILLSON STREET - ZBA 34 Willson Street R-1 Roger & Sandra Tremblay Imo-- - - -- - - - - - � ` 1 - - -- - - �.` ,5 i _ e s7 ffl iZtt �wa--� Vf —ATJPP'll 22 A 9 :4 : '83 R " DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROGER A. :C7CI°:iIP.7.•P.Y, 1:EQL'FST:CNC: A VARIANCE FOR 34 WILLSON STRFET CITY CFFR,{'S Or;ICF A hearing on this Petition was held on February 16, 1982, with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman, Messrs. -Hopper, Piemonte, Feeherry and Associate Member Charnas. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and other-- and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Taws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 34 Flillsoa Street to concert t existing two family dewlling at the site to a three—family dwel-ling. � A variance :is required because the property is in an R-1 district where the proposeduse is prohibited, '. without a variance. The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1) The property in question is currently an owner—occupied two—family—residence. 2) The property is a. relatively large structure which is easily converted into a three— family dwelling. 3) The proposed conversion of the property will. provide an apartment for a member of petitioner's family. _ 4) There are five parking spaces at the site. 5) The proposed use of the property was supported by the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1) The property in question is unique because of its size and configuration. 2) The conditions described above especially affect the structure in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the building is located. 3) The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause financial hardship to the Petitioner. 4) The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good because the proposed use of the property is in harmony with the area. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeal unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions: y ' DECISIC\ ON THE PETITION OF ROGER A. TtR,EMBLAY A VARIANCE FOP. 34 WILLSON STREET Ca = _ 0 PAGE 2 L. February 16, 1.983 °83 FEB 22 A IQ e«r ! F ERL,.-J , r aALF, vrFtCf_ 1) The property may be converted into a ttxree-family dwelling_ " 2) Detailed plans shall be submitted to the building i.nspectar, for his approval prior to any remodeling work at the site. 3) Petitioner shall provide 5 parking spaces at the site. " 4) Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancq"for the' - entire structure before renting the third unit. 5) This special permit shall terminate and the building shall revert to a two-family dwelling if the property ceases to be ollner-occupied. _ Antrhony M. Fee r 'y • Secretary APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSOWIT To SECTION 17 OF THE M M GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER £OS, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING - OF THIS DECISIOM IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. - - - - - PURSANT TO MASS. GENERAL LAV%S, CHAPTER £OS, SECTIM' 11, THE L'„$7A•(CE C' '?:"V,I +'E^':i" - GRANTED HEREIN, SHALL N7t TAiE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY CF THE_ %E6,S17:, :EAR:' THE C=RT- - FICATION OF THE CITY CLER:: T8n 20 DAIS HAVE ELA?:EO Adl) i:_ APPEAL HAS cEl': MED, _ - - OR THAT. IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE, THAT IT H.tS BEET! DIS ASSEO CR OENi-O IS . -- RECORDED IM THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNCE2 THE IiAME OF THE OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. - BOARD OF APPEAL - A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD & CITY CLERK _ of Aassac4usktts �. FEB 16 8 45 Rli mini Puarb sic ` RECEIVED (OnP OttlPM Green CITY OF SALEM,MASS. February 14 , 1983 Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 ATTN: Mr. Anthony Feeherry, Chairman Dear Mr. Feeherry: The Planning Board has reviewed your agenda for February 16 , 1983 , and would like to comment on the following petitioners: The Planning Board opposes the petition of Mr. Roger A. Tremblay for a variance to convert to a three-family dwelling unit at 34 Willson Street (R-1) . The Board feels there should be no further expansion of multi- family dwellings in this R-1 district and further feels this multi-family would exacerbate parking problems in the neighborhood. The Planning Board opposes the petition of. Mr. George N. Papamechail for a variance to construct ten two- bedroom apartments at Tremont Place and Irving St. (R-2) . The Board feels the density is too great for this neigh- borhood. Sincerely yours , W G�2� /OtIYcE�'f Walter B. Power, III Chairman WBP/de_v