15 1/2 WILLIAMS STREET - ZBA J 15, Williams St. R-2 -- --
/ Raymond L. Young --- - -- `—'
�l
I
i
v
it�Pam. �•�-Mn�'
Y
S� ���J�� �{-
j :
Ctg of ,Sttlen , 'fflttssadjusetts
PnxrD of (ppral
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND L. YOUNG FOR A VARIANCE
AT 151 WILLIAMS STREET (R-2)
A hearing of this petition was held on September 14, 1988 with the following
Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Richard Bencal, Vice Chairman,
Messrs. , Luzinski, Nutting and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters
and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, requests a variance from side yard setback
reouirements to allow the construction of a deck in this R-2 zone.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
- c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No support or opposition was raised to the plan;
The deck could not be constructed in any other portion of the lot;
3. The proposed construction would not take away any on site parking;
4 . The current stairs are in disrepair and the proposed construction
would replace them.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the .
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
m 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
Q' 11 but not the district generally;
co _ 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial
w hardship to the petitioner;
N
3. The relief requested can be granted without detriment to the public
good and without derogating substantially from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
o j
0
r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND L. YOUNG FOR A VARIANCE
FOR 152' WILLIAMS STREET (R-2)
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . All construction be as per the plans submitted and in conformance
with all existing City and State Building Codes;
2. All dimensions of the proposed deck shall remain as per the plans
submitted;
3. All construction be done with a legal building permit;
4. All exterior finishes are to be in harmony with all existing
finishes.
VARIANCES GRANTED
Richard A. Bencal, Vice Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FR07' THIS DE:!S!i:P:, IF ='(Y, SHALL BE "ACE PI1RS';ANT TO SECTIO'I 17 'OF THE MASS.
C EPI;EAL LA'6'S. C'-','r cP. $J.`. : .G StitLL 5E FI,':. ;. 4i,� K DA. S hF:EP THE DATE Of FILING
T,[IS JC-S I.. 'r.lE C E 1, ThE CITY CLEf:K.
OF RECORD OR IS RLuORDEO AND h�IEO 0:4 THE NWir ER'S LERTIF:e,IL OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Zof( /44
�o�arL D• PAu5 n L6wIi-45K1
5u0g MtuEo
2L )-6wud p 5•(ffE
31 ' N I
� �
Flo (E = AL.L Lot N4YMBFiQ9 )eCrleL -(0 LO F to
G�1Y of Sdt�M ASb��,oKS� j
MAP uuMl3Cp2 3S. !o S.r
0
' I ,
r
i
BERT
B MAN �• ; „ ("yJ iZOPc7CL? -/
I N . 18887
.S
I I
ntiJ10 � G!/GIL4 /�t�IAS d
WooO Zof /70
t3 Udlfu MS hf2EE1 \ (?w�ccrN� " pErEiz u. 5 �3andPQ� _!. HA)IGd90
1.o '7 WIUTAMg 4 fk.5E?.
\ 0
J ZL
+Y I
3
i
�lLLIdMh 5'�t2��"(
i
rtbo f rtAU or LAW
54L�N1
pploPEt2'(y of
�s1YMoHb G. \)bUt4
5G4LC 10- to! Jub/ 21 l968
• I
IJa21� ht�R.� huR.vEY Loi`?P. I
le! CAhl5X STR� � hAL�M, AA,
341