Loading...
15 WEST AVENUE - ZBA 15 West Ave. R-1 Jerrold & Ann Houghton - I i i \ 1 I 1,M1 /l 3 • ,,.COxO of "'551em, C sttt u�eft �nttrD of Appeal '83- P1ftti 22 P3 =3`-- 'JRrxuiac Na.: CITY r. '�:_•:. :; "°CE DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD AND ANN HOUGHTON FOR ;,-'._.• A VARIANCE AT 15 WEST AVENUE,SALEM A hearing on this petition was held on November 2,1983 with the following Board Members present; James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Hopper, Luzinski, Piemonte and Associate Members Bencal and Labrecque. Notices of the hearing were went to abbuter and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners are requesting Variances from density requirements,frontage,side and rear setbacks and to allow an existing two family dwelling on lot #l. They are also requesting Variances from density requirements,frontage, side and rear set- backs to lots #2 & 3 now combined into a single lot, Lot #2 in this R-1 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. -Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally - affecting other lands, buildings, and structures in the same district; b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of .the Zoning Ordinance would in- volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;and c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeals, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1. No opposition to petitioner' s plan was raised by neighbors; 2. The proposed plan will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions or circumstances exist which affect this lot which do not generally affect the district; 2. Literal enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would work a substantial hardship upon the petitioner; 3. The Variance requetel:c pgig:santg�•c�jthor�E;; i�pEaiyt�$� Edprlpmectt_to,; the public good anzP?.wircieoots s�zbstanDisalllyEde=ogan� fcn=Lhe�flmtent and purpose of the 2oning'TOiJaih9nceT`- '" TH- CtT7 oi:Gi4": :dACS. LAR4. Cj!.A 7VR Z.--3qr^ s V.......,.- 'r Silo!L Na; ';AEI EF:_CI iI;IT:I 3 Cti C5 [HE v'EC.i IJ::. !`: - T:C.F•,.1 CF TH`_ CM CGR:: THAT 20 DAPS H?F'.- Ern TEO ATTO NJ n?K.X_ ::i:C L•''. T. :W, IF SUCH PN APPEAL HAC SEEN FILE. WA. I( HAS BEES C!d:4iiSTJ C? _. .-. RC ei:EO III THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEECS ASe7 INDEXED UNOER The NP'K CF :.__ OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED OA TnE O7:NEP.'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JERROLD AND ANN HOUGHTON FOR A VARIANCE AT 15 WEST AVE. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously to grant the petition and allow the taro family dwelling on lot 'I , also variances from density requirements, frontage, side and rear setbacks on lot n1 , and to grant variances from density requirements, frontage, side and rear setbacks on lots 2 & 3, now combined into a single lot, lot #2, on condition a Certificate of Compliance from the Fire Department) be obtained. U. L: r Q z Ja,,es B. Hack f,, Chairman Cr' lvi M F- � U . :_SL 12-Vi FH!S DEC:...... .,"'Y. S51oL S_ :}c P:i RS.ANT TO SECTI^;. 27 C- I AVIS, CHAPi E4 S:S AND eHAa BE 23 DAYS AFTER THE LA::c .- C= . 0 BE:JSIEri•! III' TH° GFFiCE .. 1HE . tl CLERK. `7 TO i::ASS. GEieER:.L LA{IS, CHA?TER 2CS. 'E"....+ M THE Vd3'467' ' SHALL NOl iAhE EFFECT OnTtL CL''Y C.- THE^ECiG;�:4. F'C,'r N G: iHC CITY CLE.RX THAT 20 DAPS HAVE ELAPSED AGD'CIO APPEAL HAS 2-1 Gii i�l•,F, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FLE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS`l.ISSED OR L'[:3E;: IS RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX P.ZGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED MOM.. THE W;E OF THE OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OVINER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE BOARD OF APPEAL - - I s ,QE*/3TRy Mae/ - I CQi fi c r�Lo �/ fha/ Ih/'a p/n17 Ycr� QM�'. � ✓�N� �ri2p�r�c/ ii7 occordnr�c¢ rviirh Mors oR ) 7ch¢ AUIC5 �equ/cr,/jo�s a� ✓OWN .�. aAHSr/EL_D ; ,v f� fh2 eegisfe of Derd.-7 N05°/4 35.25 3. a c ��N�t i /� ^ rn a coNc. w4. — 2 4 �00 � o -ds rn L 57-R C1,5��/c vQz/A6�E ryior m LOrrs TO &E COMB/NEo 7-0 7==02/c.I ONE LOT CONT• 3722f,?,;= .4PPIZO 4L UHD&-IZ 3U8 of✓/ /ON R,4111 OF L11l"-I D /N CONTROL "kY NOT ,,QgUIRELd Sy4 LE M, VA SS. N0715. Dn7-E: Thi.5 p/ors rro� comp//� �rom L�tc% P2�P�t2�0 �02 *�rS Dcya 774Ax' L=Nr/N��I�/NC �dSSOC/�Tia.�, /NC • sr 22 /-Y/LLO/'Y .4VE.- SALEXi1, ,1.1�1 . oi97o 11225 p ,544-ekf PLANNING ,BOARD s"k /O o /O 20 3D 40 So _ /2�2