Loading...
22 WEBB STREET - ZBA 22 Webby St R-2 - - - - —. Raymond Paqe r �� a J -�P 87 285 S. F ± r �VVV I i _ca� ' die 11 s 3,O O - / �= 45S- So PROPOSED STREET PLOT PLAN W GBv v p J 11 SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS SCALE: f= 20' MARCH 20 , 1989 PARSONS AND FAIR INC. 1 - 460 LINCOLN AVE. _ SAUGUS , MASS. .�au- 111 � 1 �� ( , • 1 1 1 1 � F� v2' ^.1 < � � , ` ' i I 11 i I I I i t d! LJ -I LL . J - 1 9 / X I 1�j iI1I o� s I I W (,j3H �1'1x irtoo}j 9N' f '1 1__�! ' II — 1 t j ♦� �,� / j _E _:}... s ,ter J . I 10 /rlY,l - 1 Uk1 Wt 1 r 1 vVot 19 it 10. vs - I t I t 1 r u 0 I I I I II JL n daa _ j Z i X,8 iJ4�t vo,bi :�Q +_a UAP "li4 I a71x91 top LL ,• 1 � 1, , j ' 1 1 - qq I- 1J, Jj r.--,-- - _ 1 _ » �'� '. I _ Ii Y 1 _ I 0 : _ - i i. 3 - I I` 1 I I u. o a oo U_! , y LL , 1 , , I VQ ��-t- (� A— _7 ri. 1 , + I t 1 - : a w s n N N t� y Tito of �aIcm, Rassadjusetts Bourb of AJU_ 91 MAR 13 P 3 :05 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 WEBB STREET (R-2) CITYp�'�f_r,h, OFFICE A hearing on this petition was held February 27, 9g1 'wi't -the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and parking to allow the property to be convert to a three unit residential building. The property is located in an R-2 district. Before hearing the merits of this petition the Board had to consider re-hearing it as a petition to allow a four family dwelling at this site was denied by the Board of Appeal on June 27, 1990. The Board of Appeal, after hearing evidence regarding substantial change, and after receiving Consent from the Salem Planning Board, voted unanimously, 4-0, that there was a substantial change, said change being three !31 units rather than four (4) and they would hear the petition. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The building on this property has been vacant for several years and has become an eyesore. 2. The petitioner owns the property at 24 Webb St. and is in residence there. 3. The availability of the adjacent parcel for additional parking makes this property unlike others in the zoning district. 4. The existing condition of the building requires a substantial investment to make the building habitable. 5• The Ward Councillor wrote a letter supporting this petition as long as the parking requirements under the zoning code are met. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES FOR 22 WEBB STREET, SALEM page two 6. The rehabilitation of this building A�IgF-be a significant improvement to the neighborhood. '91 MAR On the basis of the above findings of fact, � on he5evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CITY Ci_E,'H'S OFFICE 1 . Special conditions exist which espec§AL1yr`IafPect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with state and local building codes. 2. All construction be in accordance with plans and dimensions submitted. 3. A building permit be obtained. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy of each unit be obtained. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 6. The petitioner is to provide three parking spaces on site at 22 Webb St. and five spaces on 24 Webb St. , as shown on the plan submitted, two of these five are to remain available for the free and open use of the residents of 22 Webb Street. Both 22 Webb St.. and 24 Webb St. are to remain in common ownership. VARIANCES GRANTED February 27, 1991 Mary J fY tirgwolt, ber, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be madd Pursuant to Sectlofl 17 bL the fAass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days niter the date of filing of this decision in the office of the city Clerk, Pu,Tv cn: 'o rj1z s. Lc:rra: L"ws, Ch7ptcr 508, Scctinn 11, the Variance not take eifP.Ct until a copy 0 the 'ec la n, hocrir.g !1,2 cer[il;c:,tion of the city Clerk that 20 days have elopaod and na ,ppcal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been tiled, that ii h:.s tonn dismissed or denied Is recorded in the South Essex Registry of De=A; and i,dexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL' `L\ Tito of �ttleni, fttssuchusetta r� BOttCa of -AU{7F� '.... ... 91 MAR 13 P3 :Q5 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 WEBB STREET (R-2) CITY pC'om. , OFFICE A hearing on this petition was held February 27 , 9g1E'wiCli the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and parking to allow the property to be convert to a three unit residential building. The property is located in an R-2 district. Before hearing the merits of this petition the Board had to consider re-hearing it as a petition to allow a four family dwelling at this site was denied by the Board of Appeal on June 27, 1990. The Board of Appeal, after hearing evidence regarding substantial change, and after receiving Consent from the Salem Planning Board, voted unanimously, 4-0, that there was a substantial change, said change being three !3) units rather than four (4) and they would hear the petition. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The building on this property has been vacant for several years and has become an eyesore. 2. The petitioner owns the property at 24 Webb St. and is in residence there. 3. The availability of the adjacent parcel for additional parking makes this property unlike others in the zoning district. 4. The existing condition of the building requires a substantial investment to make the building habitable. 5. The Ward Councillor wrote a letter supporting this petition as long as the parking requirements under the zoning code are met. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES FOR 22 Ir1EBB STREET, SALEM page two 6. The rehabilitation of this building ld 1 `be a significant improvement to the neighborhood. 3 On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on he5evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1 . Special conditions exist which espec WlEyilaf£ect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with state and local building codes. 2. All construction be in accordance with plans and dimensions submitted. 3. A building permit be obtained, 4. A Certificate of Occupancy of each unit be obtained. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 6. The petitioner is to provide three parking spaces on site at 22 Webb St. and five spaces on 24 Webb St. , as shown on the plan submitted, two of these five are to remain available for the free and open use of the residents of 22 Webb Street. Both 22 Webb St.. and 24 Webb St. are to remain in common ownership. VARIANCES GRANTED February 27, 1991 Mary J e tirgwolt, WNber, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any,shall tie madd pursuant to Sdctlofl 17 GE the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after lite date of filing of this decision in the office of the city Clerk, SC-.11' to to tj;t_S. Gen^ra: Ls,vs, Chcpler JOB, Section 11, the variance _ :,::I f-annit ^;r,.t:^rl I•,erNa st„II not take effect until a copy r:f tho n, r,,,Ing !h:: certGc:,tlon of tae City Clerk that 20 days have elaa�od and no rppeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that i1 has teen dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of De•lds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or. is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL (fitn of _'�Ztlem, �fttssurijusetts Bottra of �upeu '91 MAR 13 P3 :05 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 WEBB STREET (R-2) CITYSp�CLERK'S OFFICE A hearing on this petition was held February 27, Tfl E�wIAV he following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and parking to allow the property to be convert to a three unit residential building. The property is located in an R-2 district. Before hearing the merits of this petition the Board had to consider re-hearing it as a petition to allow a four family dwelling at this site was denied by the Board of Appeal on June 27, 1990. The Board of Appeal, after hearing evidence regarding substantial change, and after receiving Consent from the Salem Planning Board, voted unanimously, 4-0, that there was a substantial change, said change being three !3) units rather than four (4) and they would hear the petition. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The building on this property has been vacant for several years and has become an eyesore. 2. The petitioner owns the property at 24 Webb St. and is in residence there. 3. The availability of the adjacent parcel for additional parking makes this property unlike others in -the zoning district. 4. The existing condition of the building requires a substantial investment to make the building habitable. 5. The Ward Councillor wrote a letter supporting this petition as long as the parking requirements under the zoning code are met. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES FOR 22 WEBB STREET, SALEM page two {{+ 6. The rehabilitation of this building179EbeV alesignificant improvement to the neighborhood. 3 On the basis of the above findings of fact a n onP 4-.0 Onpresented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CITY CLEWS OFFICE 1 . Special conditions exist which especz§&1EyMla'M£ 6e the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with state and local building codes. 2. All construction be in accordance with plans and dimensions submitted. 3. A building permit be obtained. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy of each unit be obtained. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 6. The petitioner is to provide three parking spaces on site at 22 Webb St. and five spaces on 24 Webb St. , as shown on the plan submitted, two of these five are to remain available for the free and open use of the residents of 22 Webb Street. Both 22 Webb St.. and 24 Webb St. are to. remain in common ownership. VARIANCES GRANTED February 27, 1991 Mary JWVStirgwolt, ber, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 0 the Moss. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days niter the date of filing of this decision in the office of the city Clerk, Pursw_nt to 1.1ass. Geo drat Lows, Chapter 308, Section 11, the variance or ::'.;I Permit gran!^:1 Iercin shall not take effect until a copy of the certificntion of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no eppeal has been filed, or that, if suchappealhas been filed, that it hes teen dismissed or denied Is recorded in the South Essex Registry of De-Ids and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL I as 66-'d4'<6W-' Qatg of 'Salem' Httssttr�u e## 3 � Ont �$nlem Mum ;r� -M 9 �C2ItTlltri$ �QMX� December 7, 1990 Richard Bencal Chairman Salem Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal: On December 6, 1990, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Planning Board reviewed the petition of Raymond Page, regarding his petition for variances from lot size, width, setbacks, use and parking at Z2 Webb Street, which was denied by the Board of Appeal on June 27, 1990. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that specific and material changes have been made to the petition. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M10 y1 � `°�'u`�o�� Qilitg of "Salem' �Razsnrhueietts l�5 Of{ICP of 't4t Ctv Olrrunril fditq Wf ��ctwxs COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE GEORGE A. NOWAK WARD COUNCILLORS 1991 PRESIDENT 1991 DONALD T.BATES JOSEPHINE RFUSCO GEORGE A.NOWAK R.GEORGE P.McCABE KEVIN R.HARVEY JOHN R.NUTTING CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO RICHARD E.SWINIUCH LEONARD F.O'LEARY DAVID B.GAUDREAULT SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BWR February 19 , 1991 Mr. Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal & members of the Board: I am writing in regard to the petition of Raymond Page for a variance to allow a three-family dwelling at 22 Webb Street. I have received no opposition from the neighbors, and as long as the parking requirements are satisfied, I would have no objection to the granting of this variance. Very truly yours, GEORGE A. NOWAK COUNCILLOR WARD ONE GAN/deb .coVw� s City of "�ttlem, 'Rassuchusett5 1 Xire Pepartmeirt �Neabquarters 6gHc 48 Pfngrttr �itrert Joseph F. Sullivan *alem, 4Ru. 01970 Chief City of Salem BE: 22 Webb Street Board of Appeal City of Salem One Salem Green Hearing date: February 27, 1991 The Salem Fire Departnmt has no objection to the granting of Variances to allow a three family dwelling at 22 W bb Street subject to the following conditions: 1- Plans for the proposed construction are presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for,iapproval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 527CMR(Code of Massachusetts Regulaitons) , the Salem Fire Prevention Code, The Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire safety. 3- The applicant shall arrange for an inspection by the Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. Signed, /Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector CC: file applicant y �,cornnrl,b�� ('Tiba of ` 2TIEYIT� 2S$$fTL II$Ptt$ f1 (Office of toe Ctg Council �r 's,� (llitq�IttU COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE GEORGE A. NOWAK WARD COUNCILLORS 1991 PRESIDENT 1991 DONALD T.RATES JOSEPHINE RPUSCO GEORGE A.NOWAK R.GEORGE P.McCABE KEVIN R HARVEY JOHN R.NUTTING CITYCLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO RICHARD E.SWINIUCH LEONARD F.O'LEARY DAVID B.GAUDREAULT SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR February 19 , 1991 Mr. Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal & members of the Board: I am writing in regard to the petition of _Raymond Page for a variance to allow a three-family dwelling att22_[9ebb Street:? I have received no opposition from the neighbors, and as long as the parking requirements are satisfied, I would have no objection to the granting of this variance. Very truly yours , GEORGE A. NOWAK COUNCILLOR WARD ONE GAN/deb 3 t Tutu of �Tle11t� � �T��1L[5F t5 ire Pepartmeuf �ieaD9uartrra um+c 48 3:1afaVette �treet Joseph F. Sullivan aalem, 4Ett. 91970 Chief I. City of Salem BE: 22 Webb Street] Board of Appeal City cf-sa±em One Salem Green Hearing date: February 27, 1991 The Salem Fire Departirent has no objection to the granting of Variances to allow a three family dwelling at 22 Webb Street subject to the following conditions: 1- Plans for the proposed construction are presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for.,approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 527CMR(Code of Massachusetts Regulaitons) , the Salem Fire Prevention Code, The Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire safety. 3- The applicant shall arrange for an inspection by the Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. Signed, Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector CC: file applicant r a a '4.33 8 ,285 S. F ± r . J i y j e� Pa`kpis Q N� 3 000 O z �.Sell �Ol� s fol, 0 O k5S SD PROPOSED STREET PLOT PLAN W CG v v Q p J SALEM S MASSACHUSETTS SCALE: f= 20' MARCH 20 , 1969 PARSONS AND FAIA INC. 1 1 460 LINCOLN AVE. - SAUGUS MASS. ZA APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . alffg of ttlem, sstt�IfusE#s ��. 19attrb of �pprzd f�CU@R TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . . 22. .WEBl3 .STREET,. .SALEM .M8... . . . . . . . . . . . . .: . . .Street; Zoning District. . .R. 2 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the' Zoning Ordinance. FOR CONVERTING AN EXISTING STORE AND APARTMENT TO A THREE ( 3) FAMILY . V) o J m N Ln LiJ -i I1+1 LL CV UJ a w CD w O ? p tn co S � C5) The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of. Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner. . RAYMOND R: PAGE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . .??. WEBS, STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . .50A .744 4845 Petitioner. . . RAYMQKQ ,R,. .PAGE. . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 WEBB Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ST. . . .REET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DECEMBER 31 1930 Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 508 744 4845 Telephone. . . . . . . . .((. . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . �°: . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . LAppeals copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The ng News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDII IONS .........................._ .................................... ................. ................................................................. i ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... .....................................I.............. 19......... i a Ctu of "Salem, 'Vassarl ilsvtts 3 � � �Ittnnin$ �nttra ars� ,9' (One 14ttlrm (6rent December 7, 1990 Richard Bencal Chairman Salem Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Bencal: On December 6, 1990, in accordance with Chapter 40A, Section 16 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Planning Board reviewed the petition of Raymond Page, regarding his petition for variances from lot size, width, setbacks, use and parking at 22 Webb Street, which was denied by the Board of Appeal on June 27, 1990. As required by State law for this petition to be resubmitted to the Board of Appeal within two (2) years of unfavorable action by the Board of Appeal, the Planning Board voted unanimously that specific and material changes have been made to the petition. Sincerely, Walter B. Power, III Chairman M10 F } 4 1 41A III I _ 4 I i alfa— L i k r i 1 I I ' I � Lj 1 { f r 1 t i F1' i .. 1.,�w VAPn�, LLi p1 0 - I 1 i__ LU 71 T 4 } I lO I J cca a'. 1 �f. , ! �+ I 1 cr - ti. p E O :19 r ai LL i p I ' s�st. Eft i '�� + _ 1' 'T 141 .1 � , .�.A.1- lo I w 1 3 � w f� d o c 8 ,285 S. F VJ q N 3,000S..F ± 0 8 *ZL / O Q 1001 O ! 7-6 .76 ex 71Z r PROPOSED STREET PLOT PLAN WC EBB SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS G v v SCALE: 1 20' MARCH 20 , 1969 PARSONS AND FAIA INC. 460 LINCOLN AVE. _ SAUGUS , MASS. �.✓� Lam` ._... � _ .• yYYyCk�,ti . JUL ofulem, � uss�tttljuse##s DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 WEBB ST. (R-2) 3 A hearing on this petition was held June 27, 1990 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal , Chairman: Edward Luzinski , Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti , Secretary, Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. N otice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from lot size, width, setbacks, use and parking to allow two family to be converted to a four family in this R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The building is not presently in compliance with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 2. The four units proposed by the petitioner would be less than 500 square feet in size. 3. Petitioner has been assured by the M.B.T.A. that he may use the property governed by an easement, but this has not been put in writing. 4. No one spoke in favor of. this petition. 5. On abutter spoke in opposition, citing the severe parking shortage in the immediate neighborhood. 6. This pacel is similar in size and character to many others in the R-2 zoning district. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: t DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 WEBB ST. , SALEM page two 1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject:.property and not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 2-3 against the motion to grant the requested Variances. (Mr. Bencal , Mr. Luzinski and Ms. Stirgwolt voted opposed) . Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes necessary to pass, the motion to grant fails, the Variances are denied. DENIED Mary StirgwoltoAember Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision.1f any shell be made patsuent to Section 1740 and shall be tiled within ltY C Clark' the Mass.General laws.Chapter 808. the C the l valiance after the date of filing of this decisionChai SOSffSecton 11.the of the pt-rsuant to Mass. General Laws• or special Permit F.ranted herein shall not take effect until a copy cal has been tiled, or that. It such appeal has been def`:ion. bPermit tho certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no apP tiled,that it has been dismisseJ or denied is recordeA In the South Essex the nam Registry of Deeds and indexed owner's certificate rof Tltle the owner of record Oa is recorded and noted en SOARO OF APPEAU •J"7 '1 7 J - .v cown,b, -v y (I�ifti of �ttJem, CfttssttrhuSeffs y _ �Bnttrb of Atrpral SEP Zi 3 Ql ill ,-ILL,r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RA= PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 :+IEEE Sr. (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencai, Febonio, Nutting and Associate Member Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances from use and parking to allow two family to be converted to a five family in this R-2 district. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence and viewing the plans, voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the petitioners request to allow petition to be Withdrawn Without Prejudice. WITHDRAWN CJ-04/ ohn R. Nutting, SecrTry A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK rm°ytM y Cbc of ttlPm, C M48EtLh1ISPftB l ��t•ms +T'„V Jin N 3 G6 id 89 FILE T DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES 4T 22 WEBB STREET 'R-2i A hearing on this petition was held July 19, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Febonio, Luzinski and Nutting. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner, owner of the property, representing himself, requested the Board of Appeal to grant him Leave to Withdraw Without Prejudice his application for Variances from use and parking to allow two family to be converted to a five unit residential building in this R-2 district. The Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 , (Mr. Bencal opposed) to grant the petitioner Leave to Withdraw Without Prejudice. WITHDRAWN ames M. Fleming, Chairman LIN5 COVE 11!42—L / ti/42—L,3/ 242 ti 1 S AL \ r x— x —� 243 274 -k 2-903 6035 244 I/1 Ckn k � . 2 50 r / 230 y. B 35 236 3,� ezsp J s?pB tvAr `a clco \Ja 2g6 J' •° m 245 ° 9 � 0 wOp 23 23,900 / a / JO'��� f 0 R a, 2 Y). 10 29 3 233 ,a9 'r9g9 . 9390 00 S .�-9 �\ ✓;ia t xo O Jt 62'6 -Y a or)J ^ i. 24 t . / 1h t, PRUSAK )�•s1 E 102 21 4 h soc 1 r r Je AR25 N h s 31p 33 3 IO 13 s 2' /j0 2E y <.s i.��s BO ~•ray���,' •y f / Oj ��\: ,° 6 3> > v Al J w Bf � /8 .T .� / S° f p / � v �,,;� 153;19 s_s j q f Q h �^ay 'co1as s el b/ ryq3J STACK 41 4C r h b L�� \_V y.� \V'`� �^1 at b /� p 4 \• h G 1C s / ^y O A., � v -00/ �._. C .� .. b •� \ `•i/ f j a\ ,!S /a. Oro 02-11-91.06:29:30.54901-LE GB CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 391 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Raymond Page for Variances to allow a three family dwelling at 22 Webb St.(R-2).Said bearing to be held Wednes- day, February 27, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman February 13, 20, 1991 - .................. 16.0 ROP RLY HOSPITAL 3 W• SACHS ON—CARTM/18/91 Cay 02-11-91.06:291-30.54901-LEGB CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Raymond Page for Variances to allow a three family dwelling at 22Webb St.(R-2).Said hearing to be held Wednes- day, February 27, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman February 13, 20, 1991 - 02-11-91.06:29:30.54901-LE GB CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Raymond Page for Variances to allow a three family dwelling at 22 Webb St.(R-2).Said hearing 7:99 Pbe held ev 6 les- es- day, February 27, 1991 Green, 211d floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman February 13, 20, 1991 _ a ....... ............ ....... ....... .. 02-11-91.06:29:30.54901-LE GB CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Raymond Page for Variances to allow a three family dwelling at 22 Webb Sl.(R-2).Said hearing to be held Wednes- day, February 27, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman February 13, 20, 1991 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ('gi#g of UlPm, c4jN�xsstttl�use##s 's ecl Puar T of 4pral nmre. TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . . 22. .WEB1� .51REET.,. .SALEM .M8.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . .R. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . ; and saidarcel is affected b s p Y Section(s)) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the' Zoning Ordinance. vFOR Q�rNVEITING AN EXISTING STORE AND APARTMENT TO A THREE ( 3 ) FAMILY . 4 � � LJ cn CiY CD m P CD R N Ln The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of. Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner._. RAYMOND R . PAGE Address. . . .??. WEBS STREET . . . . . . . . Telephone. . , 508 744 .4845. Petitioner. . . RAYMON.R .R,. .P.AGE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 WEBS STREET Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DECEMBER 31 1990 508 744 4845 Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . Telepho . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. j _NO - _ 3 4 PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION { ................................................................ f'. PETITIONER..... ........................... ADDRESS.......... .:.......................... ................................................ i CONDITIONS ur F . ........................ ......................................... t� - ' ................................................. .Y .. W ................................................................. r u { - ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ ': DENIED......................... .................................................... 19......... f DATE OF HEARING a4 Z�7T/ PETITIONER lGc/ dry�i y/ LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT L SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE—HEAR L SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW / SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE—HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL {� JOSEPH CORRENTI. MARY JANE STIRGWOLT /1 ASSOCIATE MEMBERS J@Y - ARTHUR LABRECOUE }/ CONDITIONS: CQ/ � G v uG�-t b T� (fitu of "iiittlem, 'fflttssadjusetts - .; oura of eal March 18, 1991 Notice is hereby given that as of March 13, 1991 the decision of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the City Clerk to grant the petition of Raymond Page for Variances to allow a three familyrldwelling at 22 Webb St. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the.Clty Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. Genarar Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance or 3peclal Permit grawed herein shell not take effect until a copy of the decsion, bearing the certification of tine city Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisseG or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is reoorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL r ' Tito of �&aIcm, fassachusetts r BattrD of -A�etti. 91 MAR 13 P 3 :05 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES AT 22 WEBB STREET (R-2) r^�' ctrY p���._.,�, s 0 F F)0E A hearing on this petition was held February 27, 9g1� 'wi'tf -'the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and parking to allow the property to be convert to a three unit residential building. The property is located in an R-2 district. Before hearing the merits of this petition the Board had to consider re-hearing it as a petition to allow a four family dwelling at this site was denied by the Board of Appeal on June 27, 1990. The Board of Appeal, after hearing evidence regarding substantial change, and after receiving Consent from the Salem Planning Board, voted unanimously, 4-0, that there was a substantial change, said change being three !3) units rather than four (4) and they would hear the petition. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The building on this property has been vacant for several years and has become an eyesore. 2. The petitioner owns the property at 24 Webb St. and is in residence there. 3. The availability of the adjacent parcel for additional parking makes this property unlike others in the zoning district. 4. The existing condition of the building requires a substantial investment to make the building habitable. 5. The Ward Councillor wrote a letter supporting this petition as long as the parking requirements under the zoning code are met. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND PAGE FOR VARIANCES FOR 22 WEBB STREET, SALEM page two - 6. The rehabilitation of this building �d�lgFbetiei a significant improvement to the neighborhood. aa On the basis of the above findings offact,MAa n on he5evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CITY CLEF,K'S OFFICE 1 . Special conditions exist which especx§AUFy11dP0ect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with state and local building codes. 2. All construction be in accordance with plans and dimensions submitted. 3. A building permit be obtained. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy of each unit be obtained. 5. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 6. The petitioner is to provide three parking spaces on site at 22 Webb St. and five spaces on 24 Webb St. , as shown on the plan submitted, two of these five are to remain available for the free and open use of the residents of 22 Webb Street. Both 22 Webb St.. and 24 Webb St. are to remain in common ownership. VARIANCES GRANTED February 27, 1991 nn � o MaryJ4fVStirgwolt, WMber, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any,shall tie madd pursuant to Section 17 bf the floss. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days niter the date of.filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Fuaoc n'. :o fdess. Gerrral u•.vs, Chcpter 508, Section 11, thA varicnce I'•erei� '=`,-It not tike effect until a copy r,f Lilo ,�Cc 3n, h;�.-.rir.? !hs ceruGc:Ition of the city Clerk that 20 days have elo•,)ced an9 no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been tiled, that 1i h_.s te-n dismissed or denied Is recorded in the South Essex Registry of De=ds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL 0 • B'OARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE. 14 B4 9-7A f 2 TIFIED--,ABUTTERSLIST,, 1, 4 . ... ....................... A SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 4-1 LOT-. 02:34 SUFF. -t PROPERTY ADDRESS: 002-12 WEBL' STREET' 7 6 RAYNO, 19 7 j 10 %L 1 1 9 Ba' MAR I' OZ 13 10 4 11 41 0167 00,15 WEBB STREET' VLAHOS JAMES 16 ARLINGTON ST Is 12 LYNN MA 0-1?(32 T6- 17 13 ,1(-)N D M A[-l- 3 5AV t-PR TYA U-1 V�,�p 1-4 20 0QNI*c�' IdFR f T F'F-T, 22-191MEBEL-ST 1,�jq 'A 21 16 SALEM PIA 0-1970 R. 22 0 0 -17 41 0232 0028 WEBB STREET JACK RABBIT ENTERPRISE RL Y TRUST 28 14EBB ST 23 is PAGE FRANCIS & PAGE RUTH A TRS SALEM MA 0197n 2 4 Wc L -5 19 18, kA 01ON D 'R z0020-2'� TREE,"p -�,',� && ?- 2 ALI- -19:70 -p NOE ,,", ,��"S ��,4� 21 �,Qodi Fb 0; -AV2.3 SHAWMUTIMERCHANTS '�L�ANf�,"�Nl�V"�,"'% F 22 SALEM MA 0-1970 9 230 Lo 0 4-1 0243 0004 SZETELA LANE SALEM CITY OF 31 24 11 0244 0000 FORT AVENUE REAR 32 L3 Ni H 21 1 V,& MAIVE'R �R ,�� �IRO 4 �oo zo wess i8%RLt;, ,B,�JS 6N, 34 25 $ '60 N 0 TH 61 RICA 5 1 36 I' P'�'S F i rREE - " , "��I - -, "" " ' Ra �,w 27 �(njrv- ­ - -.- 28 SALEM MA 01970 L7 z 0 — Le OF 29 41 0274 000' SZETEL.A LANE H H PROPELLER SHOP INC I ESSEX ST EXT 9 in SAI. Ftl MA 11197n ?I • 41 31 's e, (9 8, 0048 �WEBBis REEI �'s T 51 6b'! . . . ... �,-d i L UfAN 70"i 2 L 32 'e, 4 3 de a UP MA"(13 /w,u • 44 33 t WEBB �,S T RVEl-,QVA �.5'* 34SALEM MA 01970 L5 - 4600 35 T7 36 Te 4S 37 'q �gs 4 +1 s 4a 511 0 39, , 52 52 40 L3 — 4 • 0 41 — LS 42 56 43 a f a V 57 44 4 0 S9 0 45 0 . ... .. ...... Fo 46 2-1 0 47— 62 0 48 4 49 4 e 5 6 $ •7 Z 52 69 0 S3 00 — 71 54 3 HIEF,:OSSES 4 0 s I ; s T V LL / NS COVE ��'Ji 0P� C M42—Ll M42—L,3� '>� 249 a cV �' 1.3 ac 24 v ,' 1.s Eq /�? , ti. x x 243 274 : ` -Y 21903 gT2 ©o�0000 - ati� i 6033 244 _T' 238a aS 23� M 235 236 els /s?oa 19,g3 41 .`•:4., :`r?" Bseo fjLj 909 y ?� r 245 25,900 "`tltltl O Rc J 3 233 9 90.1 9vy 9390 p0 •n-s / 2 to A GJ 16QQ � 7� n O J2 62 _ f U2 PRUSAK 102 z6 z, SC ARE 257'i: N h jr Bo W ..,>0 o �•: ,o 3 bs 106 Go y Irv, y g (N .i•2G6 � . � car -V 6- 6 s STACK ^Y ,til 0 P as sFoN:•C /`G: /S. A b w ly r q P y S ^\ /S /10 UZI / - p� `? ^.; p�; ._ -S Tom\ i li z2 wpb �,� -Th���;l�/�.��n ,�„�p���s bee., ✓a.�� Z• � �anr��-- o!y/�S �ic ����.{�� ,cam �LS� �Je� Jill 2on � n ; 3 G ��D�OI �• S � 7"lilh �_d_n✓� �5 I �J i Co �i-�i•ans p��s •�-f 25�- G>!1e�,6 /SiS-�Lf/� � fu., o/'� �,,h/�C Disc - �P ���L �c��/5 a-•-c �a reinQih II I __ -� 1 �I ___ __ -�_ _____ ____ _ _ -�I I _ _____ �� _ I II ___ __ �� i� _ __ ____ __ .y_ �r i -_ I� I i -._-.---.- _- -___ __-_.___:-----_._--_._---_.---_.-_-__-__tea--.__-__-.- ii I i - I III i I L. �I l :� i� 0 __ '�I �! ij 1 I __ it ��