22 WEBB STREET - ZBA (5) ! 22 Webb St. R-2 — \
r Donald Louis Jr. (Pet)
Raymond Page (owner)
�I
I
-
'� s
CITY OF SALEM
a FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS
48 LAFAYETTE STREET
SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970
SALEM
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
TELEPHONE 745.7777
-v' OFFlCEHOURB•.
E+-9 A.M. & 1-2 P.M.
r.;
'! �;
� � I
S
��
�.�� h :� � � � �
R
1
08407320436 ruGnntn.. '9
ofttlem, tt$stttlluse##s
.; �oxrb of �1u�reul
DECIU-0N ON THE PETITION OF DONALD LUIS JR. (PETITIONER) ,
,!RAYMOND PAGE -(OWNER) FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 22 WEBB ST. , SALEM
CC -
ao =
A hearing'on this petition was held on December 5, 1984 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Luzinski, and Associate
Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices
of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to convert former grocery store to
a restaurant in this R-2 district.
The Special Permit which has been requested, may, under the
terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance be granted upon a finding
by the Board of Appeal that the grant of the Special Permit
may be made without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent and purpose of this Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing,
makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Petitioner was not present to present plans to substantiate a
Special Permit or hardship for a Variance;
2. The Board tried to reach the petitioner by phone that evening
but was unsuccessful.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, the Board of Appeal concludes as
follows:
1 . No plans or evidence having been presented at public hearing,
the Board was unable to grant petitioner the requested relief.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0 against granting the requested
Special Permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT DENIED `
ames B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK
APPEAL FRO:' THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SH-'.LL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SEMEN 17 OF THE MASS.
CEI.ERAL LAWS CH="rTER 8^8. A'!D SH411 HE FPG WITFIH 20 DA(S AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
�.� iIS UEGISVi IN THE O=F:CC Cf T�:' CITY CLERK.
R*, LiASS (:E\`.°.A� LA"S. C`I: C? LJB. Sc'.'Ll 11• THE 14.^:I:;(CE G" SP_ --I. PER'.!IT
..a E' 3EI•, SH'•,LL P;.,. i!'. E `_=i L. C T L A U!", �: TLE ;:.C:. 1 i'_ i,RT-
iIJ!: :F fHE L''iY CLEF, Pd';i L: L= - H',_ v_' .iE': '::} ri•1 (."i'J,, 4;; '._ I FILED.
R Ti+!!. iF Sl, H A:! A'r PEAL H;S SEE , ❑LE� i-:'i 1-1 E', LE LIS ',__:i ;'R DL„:0 IS
P.EGRD;S I'': 1H= S;'JSH ESSE:, REpSTRI OF LEi !-N) Rf7;nEO THE GF THE
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED Oil THE 06iqER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL