118 WASHINGTON STREET - ZBA 118 Washington St. B-5
China Square Partnership
J
l
4
s
CITY OF SALEM
MASSACFUJSETTS 91970
From The Office Of April 9,
ASSESSORS19
Brenda:
4 Barton Square, 247 Essex St. &
118-128 Washington St. are all
assessed 118 Washington St. , Map 35
Lot 4.
pms
rr k�\11
w
look
a
VA
Y
_ 1�y
a, 0.�
;�
_,.
z � tr
.�
.� .=�
; _
'� ± ai _ - �
., �-
,: ; -
. .. % .�
-, .
T .� K .� x
♦ .
� �. ..
,& .4 0
ME
Imams`_
�
M�
�r
1
f� � e
d '� FI
r
. x � ♦ r*
T
�� ��
n( aw Tn.
1
rr. Waq
..r
w y..
1 �
_a
V_ �t
, :� � �
L '4 .
+'+, .r
rt :�
"i =1 � ,
-� .� .-.
i .i
� �
_. *._
< -' ('gi#u of ttlem, ttsstttlju$e##s
'3
Paxrb of A"vd
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHINA SQUARE PARTNERSHIP
FOR VARIANCES FOR 118 WASHINGTON ST. , SALEM
A hearing on this petition was held May 21 , 198JAtig th2 Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messr , Fleming.,Lu Strout
and Associate Member Dore. Notice of the heari s sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properlycii�blished in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Law &eeter!4A*Ass.
Petitioner, owner of the property has requested variances from all applicable
density requirements and from minimum parking requirements to allow rehabilitation
of the property known as the Peabody Block and the Post Office Building and to
construct a new building to provide seventy five (75) condominium units and
approximately 12,000 square feet of office space in this B-5 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1.. -No opposition;
2. Salem Redevelopment Authority was in favor;
3. The Salem Planning Department was in favor;
4. Petitioner submitted detailed plans to improve the area including
the addition of ninety (90) parking spaces at considerable expense
to himself;
5. Proposed building would be a marked improvement to the area and
the downtown in general.
One the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the property in question but do
not especially affect the district in general;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
work a substantial hardship on the petitioner;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHINA SQUARE PARTNERSHIP FOR
VARIANCES FOR 118 WASHINGTON ST. , SALEM
page two
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variances requested from Table III, B-5 density, paragraphs 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10,
and variance from parking requirements and to allow construction of ninety (90)
parking spaces with a minimum area of 815" x 18'
The above Variances are granted under the following terms and conditions:
1 . Ninety (90) parking spaces be deeded in connection with ownership
of the residential development; {
2. Developer work with the Building Inspector to protect the present
tenants and not impede unreasonably with businesses that presently
exist at the location;
3. Developer meet all requirements of fire and building code and any
other City Ordinances and Codes;
4. Site Review and Design Review of the entire development and any
other applicable City Board and Commissions;
5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained for the entire project, .
- - both residential and commercial.
VARIANCES GRANTED
Peter Strout, Member Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
N 17 OF
AF EAL FROM. THIS DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BFILED %%i,Hw;20yDA S AFTERT TO SECTIO'THE DATE HOf(FILING
G''ERAL LAWS, CHA I " SO£, AND SHALL DE NEE nR SPECIAL P`R'SIT
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. THE VA5!.AA_E _
P:. 11 c :;i!. ;r1E I-
P_'ISANT TO !AASS. CE'IEFA` Lit,c EFFC:IECT R £ IL A CQPI OF TK E=IPI= n. £HA; BEE; F1'ED
cpN ED HERE!'. SH. 11 h , , 0 '
iuFATICt. OF IHT
,.EP,: ',htl 2� U,';S WAV _ BE_;d D;S, YD CR L .':!ED IS
:k THAT. IF Su�1 A;. APPEAL HAS K FI19 dA, IT
E ORDS RECORDHE S SOUTHRECORESSEXTRN OF
ON I HEEOWNER'SDS AND I CERTIFICATE OF TITLE�Ar,E OF THE O:l::E
BOARD OF APPEAL
_ le
REQUESTED VARIANCES FOR
CHINA SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS
The following is a list of the variances being sought by the China Square
Realty Trust in connection with the development of the property bounded by
Washington and Essex Streets and Barton Square. The numbers in parentheses refer
to the numbers contained in Table III, B-5 Density Regulations on Page 42 of the
Zoning Regulation.
1. Paragraph (2) This Paragraph imposes a minimum lot area of 500 square feet
per dwelling unit in new construction. The rear building being proposed at this
location is new construction; the developers have proposed that that building contain
.39 dwelling units. Under the Regulation, these 39 dwelling units would require a
total of 19,500 square feet. As the land related to the rear building has a footprint
of only 12,819 square feet, the developers seek a variance that would permit the
construction of a maximum of 40 dwelling units in this building.
2. Paragraph (4) This Paragraph permits a maximum lot coverage on new
construction of only 50%. The rear building being proposed would have a lot
coverage of 61%. The developers accordingly seek a variance that would permit 61%
coverage on the rear lot.
3. Paragraph (5) This Paragraph requires a minimum side yard width of five feet
in new construction. As the rear building will have zero side yard, the developers
seek a variance that would waive the 5 foot side yard requirement.
4. Paragraph (7) This Paragraph permits a maximum of six stories on new
construction in a B-5 Zone. While the developers do not propose to exceed the 70
foot height restrictions contained in paragraph 6, they do propose to construct seven
stories within the rear building, and accordingly seek a variance from this paragraph
7 so that the rear building will have seven stories but be below 70 feet.
5. Paragraph (9) This Paragraph imposes a minimum distance between buildings,
"if more than one (1) on a lot," of a "distance equal to the height of the taller
building." As the developers seek to construct a building that will be approximately
68 feet high, and as the distance between the two buildings is only 42 feet, the
developers seek a variance from this requirement that this will enable the
construction to proceed according to the submitted plans.
6. Paragraph (10) This Paragraph requires a Floor Area Ratio for new
construction of 3:1. The developers seek a Floor Area Ratio for the rear building of
4:1.
7. It is the intention of the developers to provide approximately 90 parking
spaces in conjunction with this project. As all of this parking will be covered and
included in the structure of the buildings, it would appear that the off-street
parking regulations do not apply to this project. If these provisions were to apply,
however, the developers would seek the following variances from Paragraph C, Off-
Street Parking:
Required Proposed Typical # Affected
Stall Width 9' 815" 19' 18 spaces
Stall Depth 22' 18' 20' all spaces
Aisle Width 24' 20' 20' all spaces
Blocked Spaces 0 18WNW lmpo'1
M
IF
DENSITY REGULATIONS
SECTION VI
TABLE III
B-5 DENSITY REGULATIONS
Non-Residential Non Residential Residential Uses or
Uses-ExistingUses New Residential Uses or
Combined Residential Combined Residential
Building Construction 6.Nonresidential Uses- h Non Residential Uses-
Existing Buiding(t) New Construction(l)
I. Minimum Lot Area(sq.ft.) 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
2. Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling Unit -- — — 300
3. Minimum Lot Width(ft.) - 30 30 30
6. Maximum Lot Coverage by all
Buildings(%) 100 SO 100 Sp
S. Minimum Width of Side Yard(it.) S — S
6. Maximum Height of Buildings(ft.) 70 70 70 70
7. Maximum Height o1 Buildings(no.of
stories) 6 6 6 6
S.Maximum Height of Fences 4 Border-
ing Walls 10 10 6 6
9. Minimum Distance Between Buildings
U more than one(1)on 6 lot Distance equal to the height of the taller building(2)
10. Floor Area Ratio 6:1 3:1 (3) 6:1 3:1
(1)Where residential use comprises 23%or less of the total building area,the regulations for non-residential uses shall apply.
(2)This distance may be reduced to a distance which is sufficient to provide adequate light,air,and access,subject to
the approval of the Planning Board. There shall be no requirement for individual row Muses sharing a party wall.
(3)May be increased up to 6.0:1 for buildings predominantly characterized as 50%open automobile parking structures.
42
,c
S
I
1
I � / 'f� ( � � �� �\ i ` ! •�,� it `�`��'r( i�� ��%/4 \\ \ /� /' /' �
/ �� � \\. ����'`l "k'7,� . �` sem,/� 7.. I f I j�� •; �i ' i'``� j /:� '
/ S � i -��� i( ✓� 1 { �, � / ., ;-ei iii � / /
\ i f// ;ill �\� .-� � � �. i - �� �. �, , ��� / � ` • ry` ` \\\ it / �r,l` l��j`, �;' I / �' / t
\ \���.. i / 4}� lir � \ i .\\ � •t �/� h '��� ��� ,.,Qti ��� \ / �`{�' �� �j;; �� '/'!'`�� / /
Y ,
/ k
-
y \
I � I
-4R IN
VII�
AZ
China Square Salem
Master Plan
i
f
Schwartz Silver Architects \` �t�-,�� �� � \r _� ! , i'b r.,vg �
� I
I
t
Parking
66 Cars
�e, 771
1 i
I �
- - 4v 52
I f
CTT
tt T
jItr� f
i G5
rl �t
I t
!
t
I
China Square Salem _ �y M e6
Master Plan
Schwartz Silver Architects BSMT
v
I
- _—_- - — - -- Lobby
f
i 2 1
j " _ ._. I�._. _. .2� •� �t ! r 71 ..
i
I Parking
I 45 Cars
IOffice
Office I
,
i
Office
- IOffice Lobby
f f
Office
Office I
Of f ice ---��-
China Square " Salem
Master Plan ----" !'�
Schwartz Silver Agghitects Vf1V 1
i
� i
I
I
I I j
I ,
i I
1 � t
I � i
I ! I
--- Health Club 1 BR
2 BR I 1 BR .�0 1 BR 2 BR
750 a 7 J
i
I
� I
PlIvilidn
China Terrace i
t � i r —t`y r✓ i
• - a j
t i
12 BR
_----- 1 BR 1 BR
1 `BR BR I
1 BR — -
i
2 BR China Square
S I �
2 BR
i
2 BR IZoo
_ } I
_ J
1 1 }
China Square - Salem
Master Plan - - - --
Schwartz Silver Architects
1
s
t I ---
i
I
i
I i I I
� I
1
I
2 BR ---- i
2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1-BR 2 BR a I
A i
!! p I
I1
i
I
i
-� - ------
2 BR IR it 2 BR
--- Ileo 1 �, I� 12on j
1 BR j !
' R
f;CO Cj I T�lt ii i--i 1 'I', 1 B
1 BRPOO
I
I I
_�! 2 BR
i
2BR
I
! I
China Square - Salem
Master Plan
t
31 D,4TH,5T
Schwartz Silver Architects , L
7-777!= ------ __ .