Loading...
9 WARREN STREET - ZBA � I 9 WARREN ST. R-2 John J. Flynn ` 0 i. { ai#g of Salem, ttss�zzl�zsPi#� auroz � bf c�}� d '84 -APR 11 P3 :03 'S�OOIINL t�tii _ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOHN J. FLYNN FOR GITVtft]!:'PE&FfiCIND/OR VARIANCE FOR 9 WARREN STREET, SALEM SA! A hearing on this petition was held on March 28, 1984 with the following Board Members present: james Hacker; Chairman; Richard A. Bencal, Associate Member and Acting Secretary; Messrs. , Hopper and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published 11 in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner has requested a. Special Permit and/or Variance for the property in question for the division of a parcel of land containg 11 ,484 square feet of land. The first parcel would contain 7,588 square feet and an existing structure. The second parcel would contain 3,896 square feet and would be used to build a - new house. This property is located in an R-2 district. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following finding of fact: . 1 . Substantial opposition to the petitioner's plan was raised by neighbors; . Ir 2.. The., lot to be-made for thenew house -after the subdivision would be smaller than lots in the area; 3. The rights of the direct abutters with respect to light, air and view must be. considered. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The desired Special Permit and/or Variance cannot be granted without- substantial detriment to the public good_ Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously to deny the petitioners request for a Special Permit and/or Variance. DENIED Richard A. Bencal, Acting Secretary APPEAL FRO:: :E4119ti .1S S'r iL'SE �n i IE PURS�a F�'rT7O Spc'7i.T�fuF�nrl�l THHJL_PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK GENEPAL LA 95. CHAPTER 908, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AMR THE DATE OF FIL:73 - - OF T..,, CtJ!W;A IN THE OFF! ' OF THE CITY CLERK. ,dAPTER 808, SECTION 11. THE 'l-PiA.:` CR SPEC-1.1 r' 'FF - :1%. .c:. .. ::ALL N) :.:! EFFECT UNTIL A. COPY OF THEOECIS::'!. BE' ... i-- - - i 27 O'AYS HAVE ELAPSED At)) X i A'PEiL H a - :,R :'Ha. IF S;;'..:i h:\ !,PrE".. :!'�; C' N FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEiI CISI:L-__0 I mt <05TH ESSEX RE;:; P! OF DEEDS AND INDEXED U Jc4 THE - =CRD OR IS RECORDED AND NOiLD Cy THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE- BOARD ITLEBOARD OF APPEA_ BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION We, the undersigned , oppose the granting of the petition submitted by7 gJo n J„ �'}ynn to divide the parcel of land at 9 Warren Street agd'i't! � c�nalfn�ct'ia new dwelling on one of those parcels. We feel that it would be dtrimental to the neighborhood and would violate the intent of th `zrrl,i S. Cl"IYF S�Oanitrt, A15 . 7` ) - 3a LDtzrcro 5J7, - Ce S S-t-. 27 't �c(f TS`) . AL ZS C(,t esifd&S 4. PETITION We, the undersigned, oppose the granting of the petition submitted by John J. Flynn to divide the parcel of land at 9 Warren Street and to construct a new dwelling on one of those parcels. We feel that it would be detrimental to the neighborhood and would violate the intent of the zoning laws . 1p LAA C� Di 7 Lclwvtu� 35- dv 40ii6' J7 Ram c67k Oz MV a u... Q, CD: e=� cQ rT. rs Salem Historical Commission CITY HALL, SALEM. MASS. 01970 March 27, 1984 Mr. James Hacker, Chairman Board of Appeal City of Salem Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Hacker: With regard to the request for a special permit and/or variance at 9 Warren Street, the Historical Commission would like to remind the Board of Appeal of the architectural importance of the Warren Street neighborhood. This importance is reflected in both National Register designation, as part of the Chestnut Street National Register Historic District, and inclusion in the local district, the McIntire Historic District. Any new construction provided for by special permit and/or variance would, as you know, be subject to design feview by the Historical Com- mission. New construction in historic areas is not discouraged by the Commission, as per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabi- litation, but the Board and any potential builder should be aware of the sensitivity of design which would be expected. The Commission's review process would study features such as scale, materials, proportions, and size to assure compatibility with the architectural character of this historic area. It is important that all parties involved realize the design implications involved in any contemplated new construction. Should the Board have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Commission. Very truly yours, Elibeth B. Wheaton za Chairman 09 EBW/jp s� zip of '�&Ulent, d�t�s�tcl�tzsP# 4 3 w �12tttttitt$ ��narl ,f'°w"^°��� (�ttr �ttlrtn (tbrrett TO: BOARD OF APPEAL FROM: PLANNING BOARD . RATE: March. 27, 1984 RE: Petition of John J. Flynn for a Special Permit and/or Variance to divide a parcel- of land at 9 Warren Street (R-2) into two parcels and to construct a single family dwelling on one parcel, other parcel already containing a dwelling. . The Planning Board has carefully reviewed this request and would urge the hoard of Appeal consider the following points in making its decision. The .Planning Board wishes to be recorded as opposed to this petition. Any construction of this type would further exacerbate an extremely dense area. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this petition. Sincerely yours, r Walter B. Power, III (io Chairman dey BOARD OF APPEALS �8 10� p�� '�t� One Warren Street Salem, Mass. RECEIVED CITY OF SALEg,MASS. March 26, 1984 Board of Appeals Salem, Mass, Dear .Sirs:;-=- I decided to live at One Warren Street following a tour of Beverly, Marblehead, and most of the North Shore. I particu- larly was drawn to the historic and attractive neignborhoods of this part of Salem. My wife and I have lived here now for seven months, and we are very hopeful that the atmosphere and appearance of our area will not be violated by new building, especially when It disturbs the spacing and lot sizes to which we have grown ac- customed. I have signed a petition opposing Mr. Flynn' s attempt to ob- tain a variance. Unfortunately, due to the fact that I received notice of the public hearing only recently, I was unable to cancel a planned business trip in order to appear at the hearing to vocally e,cpress my opposition. Re sp e ct full y jhn L . Locke S BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION We, the undersigned, oppose the granting of the petition submitted by2�Jo n J i� Xnn to divide the parcel of land at 9 Warren Street a C,R A, c d 3: uc la new dwelling on one of those parcels. We feel . that it would be dtrimental to the neighborhood and would violate the k intent of th t S � IXs. i'1iYU'r tr, — Sr N6 NIP C 16e� St LL. -&b� S- - , Af* 15�7J 'ST - AL ZS CGS es S�. �+Nt�s ' c�✓L � � CJk.eS�� �. PETITION We, the undersigned , oppose the granting of the petition submitted by John J. Flynn to divide the parcel of land at 9 Warren Street and to construct a new dwelling on one of those parcels. We feel that it would be detrimental to the neighborhood and would violate the intent of the zoning laws . vuf 7,Z DG 7 GJatita....St Ft Im L Q ur .,, es a: t_ wl'•A. i