7-A WALL STREET - ZBA t
� 7-A WALL STREET ,}
` LYDIA KING fk
� tD\
01itu of '>9alexn, assac4uutts
r
pourb of C �"JeaI
NED
'81 JUN 17 A10 :07
JUNE 10, 1981
CITY CLERK'S
SALE:r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF UDIA.KING REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL STREET
A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the following
Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker
and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the' hearing were sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at 7 Wall Street
to convert the property to a two-family dwelling. A variance is required because
the building is in an R-1 district where the proposed use is prohibited without
a variance.
The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the
public hearing and after viewing the property, makes the following findings of fact:
1. The property is easily converted to a two-family dwelling.
2. Conversion of the property is supported by area residents.
3. There are several other two-family dwellings in ;the area.
4. The conversion of this property to a two-family dwelling will not
adversely affect the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows:
1. The property in question is unique to the area because it is so easily
adaptable to a two-family dwelling.
2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question
but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located.
3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but
not the zoning district generally cause a special hardship to the Petitioner, who
because of a recent illness in her family needs the income from a second dwelling unit
at this property.
DECISION - .TUNE 10, 1981 - LYDIA KING - PAGE TTJO REM.VED
CITY CL ERV'S OFFICE
SALEM n:S;
4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good.
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of
granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the Petitioner on the-
following terms and conditions:
1. The property may be used for a two-family dwelling for five years from
the date of this decision.
2. Any alterations of the property will be in accordance with plans
submitted to the Building Inspector in connection with an application for a building
permit.
3. Petitioner will maintain existing parking at the property.
4. Petitioner will comply with all applicable fire codes.
1
An ony M. Feehe ry
APPEAL FRO:.1 THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTIOi1 17 OF TI12 1.1An
GENERAL U..WS. CHAPTER ZO3. AND Stlf!LL FE FOUD SNT4S12 20 DA;S A:T4R THE OAT. OF FIUNO OF 1H!S OSk;iSINI 1'1 1HE OF-:ICE OF TSE CTf CUU K.
P`i" .diF 'O L°:5:, i td1 5. C;:'.:i .7 L.. S"_iAii 12, iL_ 1Cq . .. : :.". `i•":St.. FE'7�S17
.�... , .. �r.i. ..�.
CRnCSEO BUD; , SHALL Mi Uf ,` El`-U i::`._ P. 04 Ci :iSi t:kT•
FSCATMI OF 7RE UTY CLEF-1 T::AT ZO PAYS KA.VZ
GR N.V. IF SUt�:1 i.h APPEAL I!A'` CELii FI:E. THhI IT R6.5 %'1S70 :;i tiE9ili7 ;y
_ RECORDED IA INE S:UtH ESSE. FE.'ISN't OF ?_ESt, ";40
OF RECORD 0.1 1S RECORDED ASiD DOTED 0.1 THE 049:SER'S CERTIFiCAT: OF TITLE,
BOARD OF APPLIL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
sco%lin.=2
0� .ee9is/ri-e Y-
wo//
o •
Fr or�c�s E,Pr'
14
o -,1,."
o Lc
90.0
v)
9 P��osed
-t, 0 Owe//n9 147 o p7.o o ON
v ti ti, b`
7-19 -do w
d L
o
All
� efux �s
� mYo/under-Su6di✓is/on
/ro/Lorvno� ui
So/em P/onn�� T,s �ojouy�p/off was ogr- ,ved