Loading...
7 WALL STREET - ZBA (2) 7 Wall St. R 1 L,.-a, King. � v� QI Cgitg of 4jalem, �fassuchusetts ire Utpartumnt �Heahquartcrs �uaxc 48 Pfugettr ,street Joseph F. Sullivan o vltnT, Pa. 01970 Chief City of Salem Date: nrcber 16, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 7 Wall Street Lydia King The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: mnvPrsion to n two family dwelling subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) (sRl6st") compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. /�Hg*'I", 62 2- 02414r_ Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: file applicant Chi#� of ,"Jttlem, C �S�ICI11I5Pft5 a p �rJ�c Aire Peppa-r_tment �teabquartcre uaxc 48 pE:c�{M�1Cttr 4'tLCCt Joseph F. Sullivan a6m, Pa. 01970 Chief City of Salem Date: October 16. 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 7 wall Street Lydia King The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: mnvmrGilm to a two family y dwelling subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) 42*ia) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. CLY�d�G�J Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector oc. file applicant DATE OF HEARING PETITIONER GCt/ J LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND TO DENY f� SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL JOSEPH CORRENTI_ !✓ RICHARDIFEBONIO E Ki MARY JANE STTRGWOLT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS RONALD PLANTS AR�EGFIII- 6A ^ CONDITIONS: ' =1 Citu of �tticm, ��ttsstzcllusPtts .,. . ..e $Boura of Aupenl OCT 4u' 3 U4 .� Cl'i ' 1SS i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL STREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and density in order to allow conversion to a two family dwelling in this R-1 Zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The property has been used, as per variances from this Board, as a two family dwelling over the past ten ( 10) years. 2. There was no opposition submitted. 3. Continued and permanent use as a two family will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. There are several other two family dwellings in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all 'requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Property shall remain two family so long as it remains owner occupied. 4. Petitioner shall comply with any and all conditions in prior decisions with the exception of the five year restriction. October 16, 1991 Variances Granted Richard A, Biqrmarr—"c- A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be trade pursuant to SeetloR 17 Of all the cM'sc.lJen of}iM,^, of this spdecis on in hehoffice oIled within f the C tY Clleerk. `o,;- .,d to ial ass. General Laws, Chapter 803, Section 11, the Variance - ., Pcmit r;r Med herein ;h❑II not tike effect until a copy of the Decision, b:?dM„ the car hticotlon of the city Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, If such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Re[;istry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL O n 4 O CAJ T. G9 tgitu of 'E�ttlem, �fflttsstteltusetts ' .Bnura of .Appeal OCT ;'.0 3 04 1 fi DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL STREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and density in order to allow conversion to a two family dwelling in this R-1 Zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The property has been used, as per variances from this Board, as a two family dwelling over the past ten ( 10) years. 2. There was no opposition submitted. 3. Continued and permanent use as a two family will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. There are several other two family dwellings in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: t 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 1 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Property shall remain two family so long as it remains owner occupied. 4. Petitioner shall comply with any and all conditions in prior decisions with the exception of the five year restriction. October 16, 1991 Variances Granted Richard A. B A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,If any,shall be made pursuant to Sectloe 17 01 the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days -cr the da;o of fi!m,^, of this derision in the pfflce of the Ctha Variance •m,,- •.d to ict ass. General Laws, Cha;rler 803, section 11, rr -c t;;:' Permit f:r nlerl herein S! II ,at take effect until a copy of the ave ,Xcision, b.:rin^, the ter bfibeen ie the City Cif such lerk •appealt 20 ahasys i been elapsed and no appeal hus been filed, or that, filed, that it has been dismissed or denor the owner is recorded inthe of record or, the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed unaer the name Is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL O n GJ cn CD I � Qlitg of "$a1em, Aussadjusetts �"-�. f �uttra of �p}ienl hfLUlp'1:\� Novenber 4, 1991 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF OCTOBER 30, 1991 the DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW PROPERTY TO REMAIN A TWO FAMILY DWELLING AT 7 WALL ST. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days efter the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. p,ur,.s:' '.a ,,\tas. General laws,Chapter 808, Section 11, the variance Pe:mR granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of.the r••In^the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have yppaal has been filed,or that, If such appeal has been filed, the i Lres been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South.Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted an the owner's Certificate of Title. . BOARD OF APPEAL! •• (gitt1 ofttlem, � ttsstttltusetts Board of Appeal OCT G 3 04 loll' y� C1iY .SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL STREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and density in order to allow conversion to a two family dwelling in this R-1 Zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The property has been used, as per variances from this Board, as a two family dwelling over the past ten ( 10) years. 2. There was no opposition submitted. 3. Continued and permanent use as a two family will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. There are several other two family dwellings in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Property shall remain two family so long as it remains owner occupied. 4. Petitioner shall comply with any and all conditions in prior decisions with the exception of the five year restriction. October 16, 1991 Variances Granted Richard A. B A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any,shall be made pursuant to Sectlon 17 0}. the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days c: tpe data of foniz of this decision in the office of the City ler anee ,-pt 10 pliss. Gc.ieral Lawl' Ch;ga"er 803, Section 11, Pcrmii Grnlerl herein oh:II not tike eifect until a copy of the Gacision, bc:nn,^ the certdirition of the City Clcrk `,jt 20 appealahasYs haven elapsed ant if such no appeal has been filed, or that, be filed, that it has been dismisscu or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or' Is recorded and noted an the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL' O n c� O C.J O N (..O s b (Tltty of -,�jttlem, flussac1luscite 1 ,f 'NDIICa of A)JpftLL OCT Ju 'n ca JS Ci DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL STREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and density in order to allow conversion to a two family dwelling in this R-1 Zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The property has been used, as per variances from this Board, as a two family dwelling over the past ten ( 10) years. 2. There was no opposition submitted. 3. Continued and permanent use as a two family will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. There are several other two family dwellings in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. .3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Property shall remain two family so long as it remains owner occupied. 4. Petitioner shall comply with any and all conditions in prior decisions with the exception of the five year restriction. October 16, 1991 Variances Granted Richard A. B A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,If any, shall be made pursuant to Seetloa 17 dt the Mass. nencral Laws, Chapter Sos, and shall be filed within 20 days ^sr ity Clerk, ecision in the ot hic data of fifi.nC of this dflion ilC he Variance to irliss. Gcaeral LaWs, Chuplcr POS. .. .r .-e c;::' Pcrmit t;r nle<I herein shall ,at take elf cct until a copy of the Gocision, U::?dn^ Lhe ccrhticotion of the City Clerk that 20 dots have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been riled, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL n O n :.. w 0 Ca3 0 (Iitu of -,'5tt1em, �fflttsstttltusetts r ' ,•;, �. F Bottra of —Aupeal QCT u 3 04 i li �J C1iY .SS DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL STREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and density in order to allow conversion to a two family dwelling in this R-1 Zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The property has been used, as per variances from this Board, as a two family dwelling over the past ten ( 10) years. 2. There was no opposition submitted. 3. Continued and permanent use as a two family will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. There are several other two family dwellings in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Property shall remain two family so long as it remains owner occupied. 4. Petitioner shall comply with any and all conditions in prior decisions with the exception of the five year restriction. October 16, 1991 Variances Granted Richard A. B rman —'--_ A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any,shall be trade pursuant to Section 17 111the Mass.rencral Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days cr the data of tiling of this decision in the office of the citythe ler ante .:d to i•:Iiss. General Laws, Chapter 803, Section 11, nf -r-:i:P Pcrmii Crn!e'I herein sh;if not oke effect until a copY of the ave ,.ccision. b:=rin, the cc!htication of the City .Clerk that 20a°hasl!been elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such app filed, that it has been dismisscu or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or W recorded and noted an the owner's Certificate of Titlo. BOARD OF APPEAL' O n W 0 Lz -----'-' -' , ^` DECISION ON THE PETITION FOR A VARIANCE AT ~7 ' A HEARING ON THIS PETITION WAS HELD ON - � WITH THE FOLLOWING BOARD MEMBERS, PRESENTto!41a �/y'---"'-�y~vx� ~`-~' +^e,oc'r^prv^/,e�x'm»� /t��^4�' v v ` � NOTICE OF THE HEARING WAS SENT TO ABUTTERS AND OTHFRS, AND NOTICES WERE PROPERLY PUBLISHED IN THE SALEM EVENING NEWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS CHAPTER 40A._ PETITIONER IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM � ��� � ' IN ORDER TO 7�� �� /��� / ' � � IN TMIS '` 'Jy-/ ZONE, THE VARIANCE WHICH HAS BEEN RFSVESTED MAY BE iRANTED UPON A FINDING BY THIS BOARD 'THAT: 1 . SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST WHICH ^` ESPECIALLY AFFECT THE LAND. BUILDING OR STRUCTURE INVOLVED AND WHICH ARE NOT GENERALLY AFFECTING OTHER ~ LAND, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES IN THE DISTRICT; 2. LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ^� ^ ORDINANCE WOULD INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP, FINANCIAL ^ OR CTHERWlSE TO THE PETITIONER: ` 3. nESIRABLE RELIEF MAY RE OR4NTED WITHuUT SUBS'ANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD AND WITHOUT NULLIFYIN3 OR SUBSTIA@TIALLY DEROGATING FROM THE INTENT OF TAE DISTRICT OR THE PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE. THE BOARD OF APPEAL. AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE HEARING MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: � \�� �p /v�. /_ / 2. � °6 � /- ��� �. �{J� »�Y��/ `��� ` rx". �>{���� � ^ ��~'~^ /v.'v~~~ " ' ' � J' ' f~, ' v ` ^ � ~ ` ~ ON THE BASIS hF THE ABOVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE HEARIN0. THE BOARD OF APPE4L CONCLUDES AS FOLLOWS 1 ^ SPECIAL CONDITIONS EXIST WHICH ESPECIALLY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUT NOT THE DISTRICT IN GENERAL; 2" LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING . ORDINANCE WOULD INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP TO THE ' PETITIONER: � 3. DESIRABLE RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD AND WITHOUT NULLIFYING OR SUBSTANTIALLY DEROGATING FROM THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT OR THE PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE. - �\ THEREFORE. THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VOTED `» '�� Tn ' THE VARIANCE N 1 . 6. 7. S. 10. yt�CUv01{�. � (� X �'. to of �zlem, � � ttehuSPft Xire Peparimerr} en�yuartcre 48 $iafzggrtte itreet Salem, Pa. 01970 Joseph F. Sullivan Chief City of Salem Date: October 16, D91 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 7 Wall Street Lydia King The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or variance to allow: conver-sion i-n a two family dwelling. subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) 4-6t ia) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts Stag Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. /� IZP, f I V )2- 10E Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector CC: file applicant CITY OF SALEM -' BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Lydia King for a Variance to convert to a two family at 7 Wall - St.IR-11.Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo- ber 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman October 2, 9, 1991 { { { {�{ i { { ► ! {..{�s_� { { { { { { { { M { { { { { a Y Y Y { { { M {� { { I CITY OF SALEM '— BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Lydia King for a Variance to convert to a two family at 7 Wall St.(1-1).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo- ber 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman - October 2, 9, 1991 t R R R R R R R R R R R R R CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Lydia King for a Variance to convert to a two family at 7 Wall St.(R-1).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo- ber 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman October 2, 9, 1991 CITY OF SALEM -- BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Lydia King for a Variance to convert to a two family at 7 Wall - St.(R-1).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo- ber 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman October 2, 9, 1991 * * * t * * *-* * * *�!'1-* * * * * * *-7r i * * * * * * i CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Lydia King for a Variance to convert to a two family at 7 Wall St.(R-1).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo- ber 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman October 2, 9, 1991 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r e �tf�T of �2IlEItt� �MS$tIL�IISP�S TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned. represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land to ted at NO. . . . . . . . . .7 . .GUL1.lC,. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning DistrictAj. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. --o mr cn i,si 0 o rn o The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for tW fblxowing hJ `�'t w 'v reasons: - m C% n Tz � r 1 r 0 cn N u+ --- The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: ll]iGZ Owner. . Address. . . . Z4_ . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . � �. . . . . . . . F. . . . P e t i ti one r. f!(Y' d" _ Gn0. . . . . . . . . . . . M . Address. . . . ... rte ' _ -C. ... . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . , /f/. . . . . Telephone. . . . . S O 7� . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . OG�t: . 1�X . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. r NO.................................... PETITION 10 BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER._...:................................... ADDRESS............................................... ....................._......................... CONDII IONS ........................ ....................................... qr ................................................................. ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... C .............................................. 19......... 4 eooa 8528P(018 40 ` ; Ctv of �$ttlem, ttssttchusetts DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM t AN A hearing on this petition was held Jun�UL8,019t $$ am %J following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutt#PAE#nd others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Eveningg News, in a dance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. CITY 6L::nt' :'1 ffM.cM�gE. Petitioner, owner of the property, has requested an extension of a Variance which was granted June 10, 1981 allowing the property to be converted to a two family dwelling. Said Variance was granted for a period of five (5) years. Property is located in an R-1 district. L..B co c;> The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the rn Board that: N F a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally s affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; Q b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in_*74 volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at tfp hearing, makes the following findings of fact: o 0 1 . Petitioner has maintained the structure in an appropriate N fashion; 2. There was no opposition; 3. There are several other two family dwellings in the area; 4. Continued use of this property as a two family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of -fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The property is question is unique to the area because it 'is so easily adaptable to a two family; 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the neighborhood; 9 eoo� 8528nig.. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two 3. Special conditions exist which especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested under the following terms and conditions: 1 . The property may be used as a two family dwelling for a period of five years from the date this decision is recorded in the office of the City Clerk; 2. All conditions set forth in the previous decision shall remain in affect: VARIANCE GRANTED '> ---, n /Tames B. Hacker, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE hIADE P BEN,ERAL LA-,S, CHAPTER E.%S, A"d7 SHAU_ 6E !L.- OF TI!!S Dc(:SIDiJ Ii0 TH r PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF T!!E P(:G E C.(.FE IF THE F C� 4'•cTH Bf 20 DAYS AF-TCR TY,E DA', r. iG A CITY CL RK. C Cr (f!!:vG 1 I TH.. LI; A r I °F.' 11-.i .';IT Ri Llgi pl I U. N,1� Thl c., I E . OF RECORD OR IS RELUROED 'I'D'No, r r04 T HE Or N L? n `u� IH:.0 ERS LcRArILAIE OF 7 of MLE. .. BOARD OF APPEAL Dat n 23, 1486 I` hereby cerfif at` ired ` from the dat 1.1 n s p�ppp ed, a Y and that NCL _ £1 this office. m f' • , `( / � A Trus Copy `ATTEST.' TCLT .1 Sale- Mass.'' APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ctv of '�$ttlem, Anssarllusefts Poarb of ' }"Zal S��OR1t TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . . .`7. . . . 4�- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. A.—A . . and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section ,l�( f the Zoning Ordinance. /cU� M r m c cr; } (_N f`J � LO W CD The Application for Permit was d nied by the Inspector of Buildings for l fojpwing reasons: Tj mG w o -.m r � cn LO The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner... ? � 4-:!l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . ./�✓ < . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . f��.�. v 0 . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . {a-. t< . . . . . . . . . . J Address. . . . . . . . .. 7 L . ..'r�. . � �... . . . . . . . . . Date. . , . .,. . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . S Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. r NO.................................... PETITION "10 BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................... ............................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ .CONDI"I IONS ,! ............................ .................................... ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ - ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... �. ...................................... 19......... Lonox o� , 7 Wo// St .So%m MdSs . 1 1 WO// -3;-x C� 1 Fi-onus EE,P,,o��Pfux h —tow ..... ? I. a 'dSr, •... e°. lo.o z oC h I'A K►a� 3 T %f P L-1-. 5f. .� z_ 6 0. Zc v ti \ ) Do }e• �r cc Ed..,oi d L. Ronon a/un p s ���oornvo/under-Su6d vision �or��so/Lvwnof ui /on i j�s /�ouf/o%n wos o/o weo/ L ono o� : cydi'd,�,�, y,. 7 Wa// St ,Sa/em '1 Wo// Fi-ones E,Prai�ctux Z7 U ^'4r1-29-10 I \ yh i 40 to to 63.094 v ; sry-.�e—zozo�o-- •.... ? i1. so..:rd1r.�•. . ee. ao.o n � oc s /�9�/prnYo/rindei-.Su6di✓is/on l.ol)fi0/L vwnof ui on i j�s ��ouf/o/on was o Vew h 6J the So%mf�j�oco/ •� g7 BOOK 8528P(018 .10 CHC of �$ttlem, 'ffittssttchusetts Foam of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM 1LL ,p A hearing on this petition was held Jun�UL8,P191$ aSAN %J following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuttIM lAnd others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem EveninNpws. in a dance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. CITY EL,Fn .'Alf N.cMFFF. Petitioner, owner of the property, has requested an extension of a Variance which was granted June 10, 1981 allowing the property to be converted to a two family dwelling. Said Variance was granted for a period of five (5) years. Property is located in an R-1 district. co The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of. the Board that: N F a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; o b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in_-,4 volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at tf;p hearing, makes the following findings of fact: o 0 1 . Petitioner has maintained the structure in an appropriate N fashion; 2. There was no opposition; 3. There are several other two family dwellings in the area; 4. Continued use of this property as a two family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of -fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The property is question is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two family; 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the neighborhood; BOOK 8528PC019. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two 3. Special conditions exist which especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested under the following terms and conditions: 1 . The property may be used as a two family dwelling for a period of five years from the date this decision is recorded in the office of the City Clerk; 2. All conditions set forth in the previous decision shall remain in affect. i VARIANCE GRANTED l i ,,/James B. Hacker, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK ROM GENEOF RIL LAV (THIS DECISION, IF ANY. gr BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF ipr GENERAL LAB CIfAPTEK OIN F 49 A SHALL '!SIG;; I" THE CrF r F L� 4':THIO 20 DAt'S AFTER THE CA7 PI --:. TO I E OF T4E CITY CIERK. L L FILE.,-. ri ISE I[.. ... .�H 1 ^ I -J Sr. . . 7 I TH - EI: L I U. !iT A 7 E 'F' RcCnRJI a Th.� �, ' OF RECURUISRE • 'H,', vIaICINIL?TH . I hILROR LURJED AND O . - . . E0 ERS LiRANLAI[ I . pr LI FLE. BOARD OF APPEAL Date �` ?3, 1986 t hereby cerbfgc a1'' 2 !fv ,I fired from the daty' dn4 0, ed, and that Nd1 P1 l this off ice. y A True Copy ATTEST:, 'Clt •l 'Sgleioi Mass.' soon 8528Pf018 (`10 ', „ ` , fitity of �$ttlem, 'Mttssur4usetts . R Pottrb of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM 1 L ,ecc A hearing on this petition was held Jun*L8,819K aS H %B following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuttIM Ond others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Eveningg News in a dance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA. CITY CL:_6f a EM.cM�gF. Petitioner, owner of the property, has requested an extension of a Variance which was granted June 10, 1981 allowing the property to be converted to a two family dwelling. Said Variance was granted for a period of five (5) years. Property is located in an R-1 district. cS CO The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the m Board that: N a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect s the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally s affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; o b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in~ volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at tFP hearing, makes the following findings of fact: o 0 1 . Petitioner has maintained the structure in an appropriate fashion; 2. There was no opposition; 3. There are several other two family dwellings in the area; 4. Continued use of this property as a two family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of ,fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The property is question is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two family; 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the neighborhood; BOOK 8528PC019, l DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two 3. Special conditions exist which especially affect the property in question .but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested under the following terms and conditions: 1 . The property may be used as a two family dwelling for a period of five years from the date this decision is recorded in the office of the City Clerk; 2. All conditions set forth in the previous decision shall remain in affect. VARIANCE GRANTED 11 i j�James B. Hacker, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF A.W, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT CENERAL LA'd"S. CI{APTER e]S. A"JD SEI L(. 6E !L OF 1HIS D-�!SI"'" SUAN7 TO SEC710N 17 OF THF r�, IN THE LFFICE OF THE CIT}, V':cTHM 20 DAPS "IrTLP THE Vi Cl P,H. DATC C' fILiJG 0 TH; (1. l'ilI A r ,� F ,. ....� i E .F,. . .ii IF. )LL, Th OF REL'URU GIP.Y J6 J u ' ANU f. .... OR IS RECURDED gIJD NU,CD JCI 0 CIV THE DiYNER$ Of T, _ C;� CERTIr ILATL U1 f,TLE. ., BOARD OF APPEAL Date N . 2.3, 1986 1` hereby eerhf�je of ,2v Ire d from the dat( � ii§ SIr ed, and that Nd � I� .b1 thls ' office. j °� t'� rp#mo�iq' c i,• k ' /� a True co ATTEST: -- - 7 BK6838 'PG 7I4 6y,CON .. (9i#g of the t, fflttssnc4use##s Pnttrb of A";4 RECEIVED 7nafY^ .. JIyp-y�.. 7 A10 :07 JUNE 10, 1981 CITY EHOFFICE MAC; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA.KING REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL STREET A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices' of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested .a variance for the property at 7 Wall Street to convert the property to a two-family dwelling. A variance is required because the building is in an R-1 district where the' proposed use is prohibited without a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property is easily converted to a two-family dwelling. .2. Conversion of the property is supported by area residents. 3. There are several other two-family dwellings in ;the area. 4. The conversion of this property to a two-family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in. question is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two-family dwelling. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district,-generally cause a special hardship to the Petitioner, who because of a recent illness in her family needs the income from a second dwelling unit at this property. Date a ify that 20 days have expired hi's .instwment. was received, ,EAL has been filed in this `�r r'h`: FRK, Salem, M ss. rt: BK6838 FIG 715 RECEIVED DECISION JUNE 10, 1981 - LYDIA KING -- PAGE'TWQ _ I '81 JUN 17 A10 :08 l 1 r CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM MASS, 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting`Ehe requested relief:----The Board grants-a,yariance to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions:` 1. The property may be used fora two-family dwelling for.five years from the date of this decision. 2. Any alterations of the property will be in accordance with plans submitted to the Building Inspector in connection with an application for a building permit. 3. . Petitioner will maintain existing parking at the property. 4. Petitioner will comply with, all applicable fire codes. .V An ny M. Feehe ry APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASA. GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 000, AND SHALL FE FILED W;THIN,20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION -EI THE OFFICE OF THE CWI CLERK. - P1Cw".!+T TO 1 ASS. S'rUl"i It, Tali VA.!A '' M ^ ",'IA PF.N'.11T CRAtR'ED HEREIN. SHALL NUI TArtE EFTTCT L..R A CLT! .,^.F IN' ''11 1. S ' +T V V cif CaTST• - FICATION OF THE CITY CLERA 'WAT 20 DAYS HAVE EtA,SZj P::� Mil AOP2A1 )ViU OR THAT. IF SUU11 AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FIL11:1 E, TT IT Wd UN OtY'�`1`iJ':'D v''H AfiliZJ +' RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX RECISTRy OF DEEDS AND INDEr.ED uxs;: 5H� I;AS,E uF 'fNE zYIHtG. OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. - - OOARD OF APPIAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK PASTS ESSEX SS. RECORDED _ I I 1 I BK6838 1PG7I4 Y ._.. CHU of gnlentp 'Mttssuchuse##s " a Mnxrb of A"ml RECEIVER 181 JUN 17 A10 :07 JUNE 10, 1981 CITY CLERK'S LEM ME;OFCFICE DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA.RING REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL STREET A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices' of. the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested .a variance for the property at 7 Wall Street. to convert the property to a two-family dwelling. A variance is required because the building is in an R-1 district where the proposed use is prohibited without a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration .of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the' property, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property is easily converted to a two-family dwelling. 2. Conversion of the property is supported by area residents. 3. There are several other two-family dwellings inithe area. 4. The conversion of this property to a two-family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of theabove findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question.is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two-family dwelling. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect .the land in question, but not the zoning district!-generally cause a special hardship to the Petitioner, who because of a recent illness in her family needs the income from a second dwelling unit at this property. Date that 20 days have expired his,instrument was received, EAL has been filed in this ^ � ° •r1�M' '�� 1 �'r'a.d--cti r ti I, =RK, Salem; Mss. h.• BK6838 FIG 715 y`: i RECEIVED DECISION JUNE 10, 1981 - LYDIA RING,. PAGE TW,0 S 1 '81 JUN 17 A10 :08 6 > CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM MASS 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. - _ Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granfing"the requested relief.---The Board_granta.a,yarianc_e _to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions: 1. The property may be used for a two-family dwelling for five years from the date of this decision. 2. Any alterations of the property will be in accordance with plans submitted to the Building Inspector in connection with an application for a building permit. 3. . Petitioner will maintain existing parking at the property. 4. Petitioner will comply with' all applicable fire codes. An ny M. Feehe ry APPEAL FROM THIS DECISIOM. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASA, GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER COG, AND SHALL FE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECiSI:ON 1!1 THE CFFIL'E OF THE CITY CLERK. . PJCwAtiT TO t.nc°'fE.'!C.SAL "1. "+. CY,9,(%i .i GO° G'b`IJii 1L TC 1n n P ,{A PER'tIT GRACIED HE^EN, SHALL NUT iANE EFFECT o^iT!L A CO;"f OF ,N. --A !7 'i i!' G,7T• - FICATIDCI OF THE CITY CLERK 7i AT 29 DAYS EAVE EtAlSED Cd D Nil A N SAL )Vis *.;%;I OR THAT. IF SU-,.11 AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT 653 .4>B G!d�ti$!I•;.0 6''1: DEiTiZJ :£ RECORDED ICI THE SC',ITH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS ARD INOEZED IIAiI E OF THE OVIN49. OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE, BOARD, OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION,AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK PAST, �.r ESSEX 'SS. RECORDED -- I APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . dit� Of "SHIgni, AMSSHrflnuttB 13oarb of '4rral J�Gp�p JO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that a is are the owners of a certain parcel of land looted at NO. . . . . . . . . .7 . .C�lz G�. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. ,. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in acctdance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. k v n� r O CTt N W ra r,v N CO 70 cJ� O O M O The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the PllF6wing n reasons: m o -o n g = r a N The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner. .L %!/�G��. . Wit - . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . .� �. . . fl- . . . . . . . . . . . S 07� Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peti ti oner. . . / Address. . . . . . G��4f' . . . . . .. . . . . Date. . . . /� .l. /. . . . . 5�s 5 D )4-- Telephone . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The �3x5¢t Evening News. Boos 8528P(01$ 10 f. ' :; C,tv of ttlem, ttssttclTusetts F Poard of c1ppeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM .. A hearing on this petition was held JuneULB,019t� aSAu %J following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abuttfU Gnd others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News. in a dance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA. CITY gl r : I EM.cMjFE. Petitioner, owner of the property, has requested an extension of a Variance which was granted June 10, 1981 allowing the property to be converted to a two family dwelling. Said Variance was granted for a period of five (5) years. Property is located in an R-1 district. c7o The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the m Board that: N a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect s the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally =� affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; E.D. b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-'_4 volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at tts? hearing, makes the following findings of fact: o 0 1 . Petitioner has maintained the structure in an appropriate N fashion; 2. There was no opposition; 3. There are several other two family dwellings in the area; 4. Continued use of this property as a two family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of -fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The property is question is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two family; 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the neighborhood; eoo� 8528nia DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two 3. Special conditions exist which especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested under the following terms and conditions: 1 . The property may be used as a two family dwelling for a period of five years from the date•this decision is recorded in the office of the City Clerk; 2. All conditions set forth in the previous decision shall remain in affect. VARIANCE GRANTED /'James B. Hacker, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANy, SI{qLl BE MADE CENERAL LA--13, CI:APTER C:S. A.'J7 SH!,il. 6E !! OF 11!;S PURSUANT TO SECTIOr; 77 OF TI!C I,•cc D:-S:G7 II: THE r•5F:CE Op F CS t,PXtl �; OAYS A- TER TO ; • c.�c.. 73E CIT), CIERH. I TCG 1 �..:� I T11 rl: I L[I A Ri Ll IIC 11 . Thl c.. l N,',' E OF RECURU I 1 OR IS RECLhJEU AIJUf DILu r d cl I-lu E> U C!J THE uc NERS LtRTIr I(AIC � �° i Ci lIILE. -" BOARD OF APPEAL Dat �� 23, 1986 I hereby certift" at 2 V, ' Tired from the datq� n 3: i " ed, and that NC��� A this an 'k y: A True Copy " ATT;ST: FCLr6 .li'sdlern Mass, BK6838 IN71' 4 �ycoyry, (gi#g of �$HIem, fflttssadjuse##s Pourb of LA"Pat RECEIVED `81 JUN 17 A10 :07 JUNE 10, 1981 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM MP,S DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA.RING REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL STREET A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the .following'. Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of, the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the' hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General La4s: Chapter' 40A. The Petitioner has requested .a variance for the property at 7 Wall Street to convert the property to a two-family dwelling. A variance is required because the building is in an R-1 district where the' 'proposed use is prohibited without a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the' property, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property is easily converted to a two=-family dwelling. 2. Conversion of the property is supported by area residents. 3. There are several other two-family dwellings in the area. 4. The conversion of this property to a two-family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two-family dwelling. 2.. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district'-generally cause a special hardship to the Petitioner, who because of a recent illness in her family needs the income from a second dwelling unit at this property. Dote r ; tify that;20 days have expired ' his .instrument. was received, z L has been filed in this ERK, Salem; Mss. ---------------- P'A� •CET^' BK6 $ 38' PG715 c i RECEIVED DECISION JUNE 10, 1981 '- LYDIA KING PAGE'TWO '81 JUN 17 A10 :08 ' CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ' SALEM MASS 4. The desired variance may be grantAd witfiout substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of �granEing"the'requested^reliefs --The Board .grants a,yariance. to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions: 1. The property may be used for a two-familydwelling for five years from the date of this decision. 2. Any alterations of the property will. be in accordance with plans submitted to the Building Inspector in connection with an application for a building permit. 3. Petitioner will maintain existing parking at the property. 4. Petitioner will comply with'. all applicable fire codes. An ny M. Feehe ry APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION. IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. _ GENERAL LAVJS. CHAPTER 800. AND SHELL FE FILED FJiTHIN-20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILINO OF THIS DECIShTN IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIFY CLERK. PUGSANT TO UAV.'G«'1'SAL !."..... f.'r:AriE.i 0C•S S'C'FUi; It. THE YA"A' " C4. IrO'NAL FERMI GRAINED HEREIN. SHALL NUI u1nE EFTECT UCtii' A 6 !! ..^.F 1"I f 1 ,. i? l 'i 'iiS' Ci iF• FICATION OF THE CITY CLERA I!iAT 20 DAYS HAVE NA.'.«D A701 i'' OR THAT. IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE, UA/ IT 6A3 ='E.`N O'.8"129'.'0 IA DE31i2U - RECOROED III THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXES URJiaf 'EHE YAJ;E 4F 'FRE CYINta. OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE, BOARD, OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK PASTS ESSEX 'SS. RECORDED198� M. .M: I�igT �3 I L ono of Lya�ia�'0I. �Salcln Mass -Sc(7%in,=P2/� -) Qec,/9G4 1 WO// ff Ct F�onc�s�,Prai��/ux U N4r1-29-to y. p al all h I '�syS � � � h �.y�iR KIND ¢�-,er✓•: � 3 V N fO Y \ So c . p m ac E'd..,ot d L. IZonon ofufi �n � ss ��ornvo/under Su6divrsion Co✓�/ry/Lvwnot ui � /on i d Jhs ��ouf /on was i •. W r r 127 �/� 399 96 p v o ea/ o ',:4 ,F / 60 Q 96, 3 \\s °O v9_r9sJ y 9cr gat\�� 40o B 90 ss9 30 75SS O O 0 o I' /C,�/ s (-V IIS/ Q 8T . as,y 9 9\ *p o . S/.� S O 6 / C6� 3,/ re C) /wC 2 �8g 19 - \\OIL> 9T e 04 ?s `/ �T-''OD, 4 10 j/ J" eO 9y� T 3297 '�Jjs I/ -OJ� 46 m s63 /SFQ TpsoC O Ir .S S 4` 1p6 S a oTCU 9 �9B Op T6G II >�� 7 ♦ S 39 `\vp l-O O a $3T/ s 0/ n BOARD OF ASSESSORS -� CITY HALL PAGE. 1 2 3 CERT IF1EfJ ABUTTERS LIST 3 45 • a SUBJECT PROPERTY. MAP 15 1-01. 0081 SUFE; s . 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0007 WALL STREET > e . 8 <1°t • OMAP— T—BUFF �R@�PER�TsNL�RC�SS S`-°F 13 12 4 15 0081 0007 WALL. STREET F:ING LYDIA A % WAL..L STREET' � 15 12 f-1-1971-1to 1317 15 007 0007 >CIcE SCE:NI' ,CtRTb'E, CHAPUT ALICE. E; 1''1 7 CRE SCENT URI,'JF. ✓, a 14 SALE tl h1,4 :01970.e s ,s 5 _ - . � , ' c r c ✓�'. x.20 F 6 21 PATRICIA G SALEM MA 01970 22 15 0077 (3032 SUMMIT ST'RE:ET DUBOIS GEORGE J 3 ' SUMMIT ST �� 23 + ' to >tEt IS c-T-EPHA14llF 14 SAI_1�_nt ,nin r +4 -C 24 925 15 0078 0030 SUMMIT I STREET' NCGLONF ROBIN C ' 30 SUMMIT Sl ✓, 26 �2O h1CDONAE_D 'JOAN h1 SALE"h1 P9A .;.CJ'197CJ ' 2] • 21 4 - 0:7�a 0008 ( 141:! '.. FRLEr -_ mrr-r 0WIT `R r`R CJ-IG-14 .- - _ < �.... ,. 28 22 _ . .._._. . JOANNE h1 SALEM J'1A 019'70 329 0 0 23 15 0080 0001 RICHARDS ROAD GIDEON BRIAN 1 RICHARDS ROAD ✓ 31 24 SALEM NA 01T70 3 zs . .. 315 0082 WALLSTREET. IWANICIJAMES F 26 :AN "RA t 3 5Lt 27F*PANmc� F- 35-7083 nnd.air ' I 28 MARY N SALEM MA 0'1970 029 3 15 0084 0003 WALL STREET COURT CONNEL.L JOHN D 3 WALL ST CT ✓ 39 . 30 Cl 'RF A St,LECL MA 0'i 9? 40 31 15 0085 0005 WALL STREET ' COURT LE:VESGUE ROSE.RT G 5 :WALL STREET' COURT• 41 .32 r ESA1'•IDJvA D Sr�J_k-P1 °MA '01910' -'43 33 0112• CaL'k F3,_.S 1'RE:,F.T .'I - S :.� 1 '. " -::,; 4a r/ 34 SKOURAS ANNA SALEM MA 01970 45 35 46 • . 4] 36 48 37 �38 50 39 . 'f 51 • 52 40 53 41 540• 1 42 56 43. i55 ' 58 44 9 e 5 0 45 60 46� 61 47 62 • 63 • 48 64 49 65 50 66 . 6] 51 .:68 52 : .... _.'69 53 ]° . ]1 • 54 >2 55 PETER Jd CARONfye� ]3 .56 cHiE�- A��S SSOR :]4 ] a 996 —T m 7 f7o 01 ^ C/// �s9q e // of A12425 0 / i h �-AY IA- 124 y e b / / O / SE � ♦ "S 9 � \ ��T\/ �/ 3 /• � 60 2 m300 / /,, \ to O 99; 4Ss % h 9s,6 /qs 0 // // °S sc, 4v e 92 s � ,p4 2 X03 �� o ~ /O \ • \\\ S /O / /'475 asr O V 02 / OOs 15.09 e /3v / ®Q ti `orP j9 'CO 9 � 2s CT /6 VIP 0 0 1110 15, Qy /mss �9i /s j2 bio /� . \so O Jk v O s S �oQ`^ T -Q •/�j�4 . h o' �2't [//\/�7 TS' 06� 16 CC7 o Vr 46 el ?,AY I s S 38 (C\_ ` �• TSOc APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . °''vi flli#v ofttlEm, tt a attcl�usE##s 'Puarb of C�pprttl TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ­ . . . . " ' . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District K..( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. `11Uj � cD a{ r [n .� W V� V The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: ^� The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: VC�1twc� Tb r ron 7a CLUCw Cc*s�rvc t0�t DT C� Owner. . . . .£. . . ..ter. . . Sa. . . Add ress.2 )? v ve;✓ 4"'. .l, L�c�.,� toi5z_ Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . w r Sti\�o . . g�. .G Address. . �.5`%A-V cq .©M!"`��. . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . .9f. . s—R Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . "4.4. . : /. .<??:"�. . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. s� 8524636 CHU of '5alem, 'Massac4use#fs o POMIa Df Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RALPH F. SALVO FOR A VARIANCE AT 40 CLARK ST. (R-1 ).. A hearing on this petition was held July 16, 1986 with the follgWknj Yiodsd Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Richard Bencal, Secretary; Messrs. , L1 i4,& d86 F!eminR, Notice of the hearing was sent t.c abutters and othersF&X*notices of the nearing wet , properiy N e_i,i. :•• '^ 'the S:lem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chaptar ',OA. tbr..M�ES Petitioner is regoestirg a Variance frotr frontage to divide a lot into two lots, and to construct a single family dwelling on each lot. Each lot would have app bxi- mately 75.5 feet of frontage. m -o The variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Boar that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affectcshg other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; w b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the publS.c d(:u,: <. .d wi``.^"t rallifving or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Oed1nanc,e. o The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at ttC=> hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: _ 1 . Support for the plan was voiced by neighbors. abutters and others; o 2. The existing lot is 43,447+ feet with frontage of 151 ,22+ feet. , On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the BoE:rd of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the land involved but do not generally affect other lands in the same district; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted witnout substantial detriment and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RALPH F. SALVO FOR VARIANCES FOR 40 CLARK ST. , SALEM page two Thei-efore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . The division of the lots shall be a per the plans submitted. One lot to have square footage of 22,894+ and the other having a square footage of 20,553+. Each lot to have frontage of 75-6+ feet; 2. A Certificate of Occupancy. be obtained. VARIANCE GRANTED Richard A. Bencal, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK iF A.:Y, SPALL BE :!ADE pORS7A9U.> S pEC-'3 TFIE OF TI,' f:'_ •; MR OE'. >I-%i�• gc F.L.... 4i'.:'r: ` S F.^ Tit, $N',.l lws SI 'll :4:.l u DAYS 11 'i` ..... I- I .r. .\ Jt f. ',.i 0 h i� IT o Y..._ (.r In C7tG:d I A LP. TWT Ir cL � F'': F 'L H 'J . _ RECDF.CED IN TF'.E SOJIN EaSL'• RE,.'' C -�� OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND KOTEO ON Ti1E DO h�Y.= CCR F c BOARD OF APPEAL Date September 23, 1986 I !',ere.:y cert f.X JHdlt=20j,0ays have expired ,a: dnt�-'Rs Fnstr<unt C *t ,wcs received, :nai.,`vO A P,FI+_LS]�as b6en filed in this r Trua C`,,py,. ' iTTS;T: - }Vfrm, Nass. e .v o o heel f-Pro� • �icor �' r Alr�r �pP �./nidi. Edge cy^ 75,6 / , 75.6/ vv � � / 'h'o��^ �� ` / %✓obi- T M ` SL�i'✓/Gtr �MI Service `) Orr /%ny �Pr000sec� � %�\ h P1.A1V 22,89.¢-3 . ZD,553- .F� - / For Pr: Ex/-1 r': ,Pecor:� �rT` � -'NFE7'777-1- 40 i TL 4o=a 'l 540 ' w 7-cS. rx�ir 83 Pint 57 o 39 3 3' 14— 40 �� / 39 B e0 ae 13i3p# 22407 39 10 VVV// j v2 so O TR J0o.9 60 9 �i co FFT ISO `y •e 105-5 y I 700 CITY OF J, 3 SALEM I •111 21B pw 2 .34, 4 1JAC -'ul. _ 7 YAC