11 VINNIN STREET - ZBA 11 Vinnin St. R-1
Thomas & Nancy Kelly
I
N
Qs-
tii
of *ttlem, 'Massadjusetts
e
�RnttrD of Aupettl
February 15, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF FEBRUARY 08, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY FOR A VARIANCE TO EXTEND
SHED DORMER AT 11 VINNIN STREET.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
4
(fity of ttlem, 4RUssadjusetts
39nara of Aupeal FEB
d 31n r_
r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to extend
shed dormer. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by
this Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. Extension of the shed dormer will be in conformance with the existing
structure.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
v
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page two
FEB 3 10
C;TP'
r; s
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidenCe' presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony
with the existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
"��
J
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
J .
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR VARIANCE
AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page three
FEB �o P� 'yea
CITi
C,
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
of lWem, � ttsstttl�usetts
nttrd of �,upeal FEB
CITY
'`:S
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to extend
shed dormer. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by
this Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or theur ose of the Ordinance.
P P
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. Extension of the shed dormer will be in conformance with the existing
structure.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
:CISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR A
;RIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
ige two
FEB 3 3 lo PPi '91
C!T
S
i the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidencepresented
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
it not the district in general.
Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
evolve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
iblic good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
hent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
ierefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
:riance requested, subject to the following conditions:
Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony
with the existing structure.
A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
:riance Granted
nuary 19, 1994
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR VARIANCE
AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page three
FEB b 3 i0 Fri °oq
circ
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
of Salem, '-ttssadjusetts
; s 'Botts of u}tettl SEB
4 &
>S
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to extend
shed dormer. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by
this Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. Extension of the shed dormer will be in conformance with the existing
structure.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
J
DECISION ON THE PET1-7OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page two
FEB 3 is Phi '91
C!T,
s
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony
with the existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR VARIANCE
AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page three
FEB
CITY
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(Ilii of -t'ktlem, � ttssttcllusetts
3 � f o
d bnttrFEB
4 � �'�eal
C;%Y
r "s
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to extend
shed dormer. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by
this Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. Extension of the shed dormer will be in conformance with the existing
structure.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page two
FEB 3 is Ft9 '9a
Cary
r nj
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidencepresented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony
with the existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR VARIANCE
AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page three
FEB i 0 Fii 'yq
CITY
C;
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNTNO BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
Ctu of _,�UIJOM9 44jjaj5gacjju5etts
x
3 �► 9
-Batira of �kupenl FED
O
31o "
p
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY
FOR A VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held January 19, 1994 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Albert
Hill, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to extend
shed dormer. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by
this Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. Extension of the shed dormer will be in conformance with the existing
structure.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
page two
FEB J 3 10
C:T'
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evident:e presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2 . Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial. hardship to the petitioner.
3 . Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. The proposed construction shall be done in strict accordance with the
plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem
Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction .
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed construction shall be in harmony
with the existing structure.
o. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
Variance Granted
January 19, 1994
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOC`:AS AND NANCY KELLY FOR VARIANCE
AT 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEi•i
page three
EB u
r;iT-
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN F iLED WITH THE PLAN'iv'IPvG BOARD 'ND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
JE EE ,
AT:. OF ::_.:RANG
PETITIONER
i
OCATIOi: /� J(/y �vn
dOTION: TO GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
STEPHEN O'GRADY J
GEORGE A. AHMED v
FRANCIS GREALISH IJ
l
A..BERT G. HILL
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE !EMBERS
NIN OH �RJ
4 H1101 E
CONDITIONS:
J
h C �
PPEA.L CASE :NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�A.CU.Tl1ry�
(9Tttt Lif niem, 44'3 assachusetts
waarb of rAppeal
G
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-he Undersign d%represent t��•ha, t he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . . . ././. .�. �'Yt.WLL�r. tiA : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District�.�/ ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ana said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
<� o
c
M -
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Board of Appeal ruling 3/2/881113 "no expansion would take
place, only rc6toration"
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
To extend a shed dormer from present configuration to cover
first floor porch.
� X
+N
A _ Owner. . .Thomas. .
& NaNCY Kelly.
it IA j � lilel a 'j� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. _• t
Address. . ? . . . . . . . . . . .
617 ) 631 -1060/503 ) 7111 _8590
ki
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . .Same. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address . . . . Same . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . Same
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . .;i1,Fj,9,9q _ , , ,
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening 'News.
LOU1IrI11, r11IISSIIC1118 !
Mas 2 3 1011 _Blau{ �`�
E1LEHunrl1 of �pprul j
CIiT CLEP,I.. ,t..Lll. µt!',5 , "ff1TEE8X.sAlIN.��1TS5.
P;C1:11UN ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY FOR A
lAntANCE FoR 11 VINNIN ST. ( 11-1 )
A hearing on this petit,ton was held February 17 , 1988 with the following Board
;lemWn present: .fames Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Strout and Associate
Member Imre. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices
of the hearing, were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Mnssachusetts Ceneral Laws Chapter GOA.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are. requesting a Variance Lo allow the
premtses to be used for an office and the display and sale of kitchen installations
and accessories in this n-1 district.
The.Varinnce which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Hoard that:
n. rpecial condiLions and circumstances exist which especially affect
We land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b, literal enforcement or the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
C. desirable relief may he granted without substantial detriment to the
Public good and wtt.hout nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent or the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The t;,,ard or Appeal , nfLer careful consideration of the evidence presented and
afL�r viewins the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 _ AlLhnught currrnr inning for this parcel is R-1 , the immediate area
-onsints or remmerciaL and condominium development:
. phis parcel .in not; conducive for R-I -.oninn;
1. No expansion would take place, only restoration;
A . There was no oppo.siLion;
There was neighborhood support;
16 the basis or Lhe above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
Bearing, 1_he hoard of Appeal concludes as follows:
I . Special conditions rxisl, which especially the subject property but
not Lhe district generally;
1. Literal enforcement of Lhe provisions or Lhe Ordinance would involve
substantial Hardship In the petitioner;
�w"C)tJ TII ION OF TIKE-0AS A NANCY KELLY FOR A
� NUE FOR 11 VINNIN STREET. SALE11
a ,tge two
J. The relief requested can be granted without detriment and without
nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district
or the purpose of the Ordinance.
therefore, the Zoning hoard of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 , A building permit be obtained prior to any construction;
All requirements or the Salem Fire Dept. be adhered to;
J. Renovations be as per plans submitted;
4. Seven (7) legal parking spaces be maintained on site at all times;
5. (lours of operation to be 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday;
6. No Sunday hours;
7 . Premises to be used for kitchen display on the first floor only and
office for the kitchen display company on the second floor.
R. No storing of merchandise or manufacturing shall be conducted on
the premises;
9. A Certificate of occupancy is to be obtained.
GRANTED
.Lames B. Hacker, Chairman
IT THIS PECIST(IN NA; PFFN f? LED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
I'.1
... r:'., . . pV
t
.! Ft BOARD 01 AI'I'EAE
r;
_ +1 J -
0
x
27,2'49
87
ti � es
0�6 aJ 28,51/
20' DRAIN /
1 �J EASEMENT /
Q i /
88
25,355
ro
ro m
6 39
A/ 6 ti p� i obi 3q F4,G
61
96
h i
.Q 6 \� p9 // // \C0 p9 °o
4j9 00 es 66
o /
39
1A, ro
OSS e
co ? 1 (0 QO ms ��96 7400 `4
��\b 8489 7550-7„_s
?SS
r
' O/ O 7
2 h0�6 —'—'' • c4 1
3 � a —
7.63 AC 0hb ~ z 64 cj
1
a
0 o48
e�22
POND F 15011
86 /
35000
/ 5904 5 M PRk
a 67
q26 /
J �Nr1c%
1
01-04-94.1126:39.37341-L J AN
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745.9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by THOMAS &
NANCY KELLY for a Variance to extend shed
do be held WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 19,1994 hearing
t 1994 AT
6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor_
FRANCIS X. GREALIS H, JR., hairma1
January 5, 12, 1994
A CHRISTMA4
A SPECIAL ' '
TABLOID SECTION
TO BE PUBLISHED
L-TL T F t) A,V
01-04-94.11:26:39.373 41-L J AN
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons THOMASinter-
,,led
-
ested in the petition submitted by
NANCY KELLY for a Variance to extend shed
dormer at II VINNIN STREET(R-1). hearing
to be held WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 19,11994 AT
6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor,
FRANCIS X. GREALISH, JR., hairma1
January 5, 12, 1994
r�\A_ a 1.1 . ' + • • Y • Y
Clt
6'
2'0D' 12.0 ROP ON :I
N D01tE'_-INSt}RANCE
ASdNS7 SRfET'INGS
192 ""NEN ;• C -31
". r�w
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.Cd
` Ctv of �5ttlem, Aassar4usetts
.. Panrb of �Vpeni
S�
Gp�
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersign d represent hat he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locat d
at N0. . . . J/. . /!!1/YLc�c�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District�.-�.
. . . • . • • • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� o
�= w
p-" Cn
B.a.A w o
Q >u.i .
Cn %Aar
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Board of Appeal ruling 3/2/88, 113 "no expansion would take
place, only raoration"
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
To extend a shed dormer from present configuration to eover
first floor porch.
i
h
t
Iw i Thomas & NaNCY Kelly
** II Owner. .
111111
n II!
Address. .l1. vinni. } .st:.,. .Sa�.ao. . . . . . . . . . .
ri Telephone. 617) 631 -1060/500) 741 .8590
Petitioner. . . ame. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . ;:?m?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . Same
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Sec etary o',f the Bo r, of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . .. 1,F5, 9o1 , , ,�I !
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. check payable to The
Evening 'News.
NO............... .........
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................. ..............................
PEI I I IONER..........................................
ADDRESS...................... .... .. ................
................................................
CONDITIONS
........................... ..... ..............................
......-...............I .............I-,..... ...-........
................................................................
................I.-....................... .......... ......
......................................................I..........
............................................. ...................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.............. ......
...................................................1 19.........
22bill
CS 1 27,249
12�o ot)ti 87
6 6A dJ 28,511 /
6A /2s 2d DRAIN
ti12� h �s EASEMENT /
88
25,355
Vro
39 �v ,n
Ay
ash
COP cs F
JO 'Q bh \(0 Qg 20
�1 lb ° s
39
/
A� 1AA a.
ol
O�,s 0
c0X04 \s N 96 7400 IA
8489 7550-?orS
?ss 55" R- c
6 4 1
7.63 AC �yb 64 ci3\� 1 tK h
8,048
02
I y vo 11 8,
POND 15011
86 /
J V 35000
5904
4Z6
'% Bea 2 3 i�'�d flouf �nlrllll C Mssucljuse
q
oaa_ flu
FILE# putts of '4vrul
4v.[
CIIT CLEP.F.. `1J.L[H, t,t5s c
DECl'iON ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE FOR 11 VINNIN ST. (11-1 )
A hear•inrp,, on this petition was held February 17, 1988 with the following Board
Members present: .James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Strout and Associate
Mcmber Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices
of the hearing, were Properly published in the Salem Evening News In accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are._requesting a Variance to allow the
. premises to be used for an office and the display and sale of kitchen installations
and accessories in this R-1 district.
I'he.Var•innce which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise; to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
Public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent or the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
the 110ard of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
A.lthOUght current zoning for this parcel is R-1 , the immediate area
r.on.sists Of commercial and condominium. development:
2. This parcel is not conducive for R-I zoning;
3. .:,tJo.ezpahiorc'wduld take pl�ceidorilymr•estbratY'on`"`
� . There was no opposition;
'There was neighborhood support;
nn the basis of the above_ findings of fact, and on the evidence- presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 • Special conditions exist which especially the subject property but
not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement. Of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
tj THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY FELLY FOR A
ICE FOR 11 VINNIN STREET. SALEM
page two
gyo 3. The rejief requested can be granted without detriment and without
nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district
or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Hoard of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . A building permit be obtained prior to any construction;
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. be adhered to;
3. Renovations be as per plans submitted;
4. Seven 171 legal parking spaces be maintained on .site at all times;
5. pours of operation to be 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday;
6. No Sunday hours;
7 . Premises to be used for kitchen display on the first floor only and
office for the kitchen display company on the second floor.
8. No storing of merchandise or manufacturing shall be conducted on
the premises;
9. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
,RAN'T'ED
lames H. Hacker, Chairman
A C"VY ^F THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE FLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
1..
11 L i I 1LI
VF.`.1 f�Ll ill'� I fll I. .,I Lnfr
uER� Tuin ,o
1!fEE.
r'IiE uCi IL 1 .,,.t1J111 I'..1 I BURR Or A01AI
3 A1@811f �izllrnt,
FILE# Ponrb of Apprzd
Iulhl ,Imo"
CI11[ CLERE. S''_L1{, 0ts5, " �$K•�A1F 5.
DFCJ:. JON ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE FOR It VINNIN ST.
A hearing on this petition was held February 17, 1988 with the following Board
Members present: lames Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Strout and Associate
rlember Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices
of the Bearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
Witt] rlassachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are., requesting a Variance to allow the
premises to he used for an office and the display and sale of kitchen installations
and accessories in this R-I district.
The- Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. "'pecial conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other, lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
r_. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent or the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Hoard of Appeal , after (.,ireful consideration of the evidence presented and
after view-inrt the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . AILhouf;ht current ;.oning for this parcel is R-1 , the immediate area
corr^ists of commercial and condominium development;
< . This parcel. is not, r.onducive for R-1 coning;
7t'o d expansion would take, Mace''"onlx
y .res♦b5 at`i`ori;
There was no opposition;
There was neighborhood support;
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence, presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appealconcludes as follows:
I . Special conditions exist which especially the subject property .but
not the district generally;
(..iteral enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
IN THE PETITION OF THOMAS h NANCY KELLY FOR A
ICE
FOR 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
gage two
3. The relief requested can be granted without detriment and without
nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district
or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . A building permit be obtained prior to any construction;
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. be adhered to;
3. Renovations be as per plans submitted;
4. Seven 17) legal parking spaces be maintained on site at all times;
5. Hours of operation to be 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday;
G. No Sunday hours;
7 . Premises to be used for kitchen display on the first floor only and
office for the kitchen display company on the second floor.
8. No storing of merchandise or manufacturing shall be conducted on
the premises;
9. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
GRANTED ` /
games H. Hacker, Chairman
A CCPV "F TI!1:; DECISION HAS BEER FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
rk;.l. IR r..l •u':;; r n^,e:'1. cl I nr� ra r
s.
rrnl
-
I I .r,. aj i.._
k ' t,[RTl F1Ud[ .;: Un.E.
I .0 lli
( n bi o r' 14 L�,.�.W 111 I': J I
-BOARD OF ANI'EAI.
;PPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(gity IIf �5:_ttlrm, C4Rn!55ac tusrffs
'J curb of �ppral
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersig�gged_represenpt ,that they are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
3t N0 -_I e_-— - t , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.
. . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . .`."`. . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� o
o
n.e' W"E
—...j
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons :
Board of Appeal ruling 3/2/88; #3 states "No expansion would
take place, only restoration"
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
To extend a shed dormer from present configuration to
cover first floor porch.
W
,
q �
Owner. . . Thomas. .$ .N;3RRy.KAjjy. . . . . . . . . . . .
I 1 BI 111 1 II f i
I Address. 1.1. .Vinnin. St.., . Salem. . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. .617'.).631.-1..0.6O/508'J . .7.41-85.90 . .
Petitioner. . . . . Same. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address . . . . . . . . Same. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . . . . .Same. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount cf�165_90. . . .7,9.'1O. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals.' Check p�yable to The
Evening News.
.�
m � - m
.-] O =1
'� �+
n
�Z � � � Z_ Z `, �
� � o z o 0
z A J .- ?
o � c
� � L _
`'' " z c
a
�o
❑ ❑ �
.. ",
3 1011811f �$ttlrinj C ttssttrljuse �� r�
FILE# Pourb of 'PPrul fl
1:7,J ON ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS & NANCY KELLY FOR A
VARIANCE FOR 11 V1NN1N ST. ( R-1 )
A hearing, on this petition was held February 17, 1988 with the following Board
Members present: ,lames Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Strout and Associate
Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices
of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow the
Premises to be used for an office and the display and sale of kitchen installations
and accessories in this R-1 district.
I'he .Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent or the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
rhe Roard of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
after viewing, the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . AlLhought current zoning, for this parcel is R-1 , the immediate area
consists of commercial and condominium development;
W. This parcel is not conducive for R-1 zoning;
-noiz
a:., klJoezpans iohawdUld Y,ake p"1'adtJ only-red�orata�`or '"
4. There was no opposition;
`i. There was neighborhood support;
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
I . Special conditions exist which especially the subject property but
not the district generally;
Z. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
�+F..y ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS R NANCY KELLY FOR A
w�1c . FOR 11 VINNIN .STREET. SALEM
page two
3. The relief requested can be granted without detriment and without
nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district
or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . A building permit be obtained prior to any construction;
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. be adhered to;
3. Renovations be as per plans submitted;
4. Seven (7) legal parking spaces be maintained on site at all times;
5. hours of operation to be 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday;
G. No Sunday hours;
1. Premises to be used for kitchen display on the first floor only and
office for the kitchen display company on the second floor.
R. No storing of merchandise or manufacturing shall be conducted on
the premises;
9. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
GRAN'T'ED '
Times H. Hacker; Chairman
A WrY ^F T!1:; PEC13ION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
.. unr, ra
CR + L[RTMUIII C'i 1!flE.
BOARD 01- APPEAI.
MORTGAGE INSPEC'i ION
BAY' STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION NOTES :
-
SCALE I =Z0 FT. ATE 3 • This is a Mortoaae inspection survey and not
REFERENCE s 81�. .3�Sf?._ _.C?: _7. ............ an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
mortgage inspection purposes only.
• This survey is based on survey marks of
others.
-
To _ - (r,�R[z(��_/�J F� ✓ - - - • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
hat the
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and tnot necessarily Indicate property lines.
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
shown and that they conformedto the zoning setbacks of the • The building(s) are not located in the speclal
when constructed. flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
W1l!"OrvI:R AN 014! E1 I`3
1'+ OR LESS AN INSTR. SURVEY IS
13ECOMMENDED TO DETERMINE
PROP. LINES. ���P�tH or e�9ss
On RT
A
O 1 S n N
0. 20004 Q
Jf/�FClS1ER�i Qv`"'�' _
�N41 EAND
r —i 1t.7
J
� i- wZ. ati
N
7z )Do
THOMAS & NANCY KELLY -- 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
ST
!
i
F[F MORTGAGE INSPEC t ION
— BAY' STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION 3/J[- /y)f /VIA rj5, NOTES
SCALE I =zD FT. DATE • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
3�_£r7___._.__.
REFERENCE an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
B.K, 3' Sf�_. G: 7. ............
< — mortgage inspection purposes only.
e This survey is based on survey marks of
---------- others.
To - - (UiftF,? �� 1/ _ -: • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the
shown o not necessarily indicate property lines.
building (s) sM., n this plan are located on the ground as
shown and that they conform4to the zoning setbacks of the • The building(s) are not located in the special
when constructed, y
flood hazard zone as defined b H.U.D.
•- -•_- - .__�?.__��4.�!�.____.
�i
,1
W111:_fdEVi:R AN 0i 114i 12i
1'+-01? LESS AN INSTR. SURVEY IS
RECOMMENDED TO DETERMINE
PROP. LINES. ���P�u1 Ns 4qs
On nT �. .
A
01 S ^ Z4 .
8r
0. 26094 e
V CiSTQV
I LAND SJQ
J
i
1z Do
THOMAS & NANCY KELLY -- 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
71 ��MORTGA-G-E INSPEC'i ION _
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC..
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION 511L-I�7M /VIA , NOTES :
SCALE : I" =ZO FT. DATE j 3 • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
g 7 an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
REFERENCE 8 K. ,_���7._��?:�7�._......._._ mortgage inspection purposes only.
�. a This survey is based on survey marks of
.-.-__•__ __ . others.
To _ - (n,1A(Z�� ►�,1 �� i/ - _ • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the not necessarily indicate property lines.
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
shown and that they oeonform4to the zoning setbacks of the • The building(s) are not located in the special
C-� r -F $���!�!1__.._• when constructed, flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
V111PrVER Ail OI [!;I1 I'r,
1'+_01Z LESS AN INSTR. SURVEY IS
RECOMMENDED TO DETERMINE
PROP. LINES. ���P ti„ ur Mgss
o On RT .
A -
.a O If S ^
0. 20094 r .
ae-QS1EO
1 LA0 SV
J
� Z - w�. ,atia� g
\0 , N
.0
X183 /
-7Z CD0 1
THOMAS & NANCY KELLY -- 11 VINNIN STREET, SALEM
DE o s T
I
I
i
�\ I�
\ I
-v loll
I 1 g1ti �
LV
1 7-3-
-
CHU of �$ulem, jEassurhuseffs
FIRE DEPARTMENT•FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU June 22, 1988
48 Lafayette Street
" Salem,Massachusetts 01970 (Date)
In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 148 G.L. as provided in Sec. 26C and/or 26F, smoke detectors have been
approved within residential and/or commercial occupancies.
o,cncr. Thomas Kelly _
(Full name or person, firm or corporation granted permit)
Smoke Detectors have been installed and are approved for type and location as per current codes -
as of this date.
SMOKE DETECTORS REQUIRE ANNUAL MAINTAINANCE AND CLEANING
Tvpe of RESIDENTIAL Number of Dwelling Units
Occupancyt
Ida! COMMERCIAL Note: Condominium Units require individual
Certificates of Compliance.
11 Vinnin Street(Mailing Address: 183 Tedesco Street)
(G've Iota lion by street and number, or describe In such a manner as to provide adequate Identification of location)
(Signature of official granting ermitl
,\OTIC E: Certificate is NOT VALID, for sale or transfer of real estate, ��,., ^�
60 days after date of issue. (r;u
l urm K( Rev. 10/86)
<4f to
10
5r0 \A QO 6y °o �O ee ti-`/�3 \ �Pe �,({J l� - 2d DRAIN ' \
EASEMENT
<�
e° ee y1 10 yo i 88
\0'b6 ae ?e /i"�i� 25,355
evaq
° h60619 6\0ti ds 6\ha vP tj'y 89
V 00 Oa0 0 4L eo \� \ °e a 39 v o h 6 22,348
�00 56 560 'e 2G< ♦ O \�11a C,S4 s W fold ah �a°,P� i 9'• 4/'F
O g ?o 'Y 1 V-4.1 61
6+ + �LO� o a ° \095 O<Fq eQ 1y /�i Pi .o ea F 9 -
ty\h00 h6 rl►O e P L A C of ° Pe 6 'C509 ,� �/O 9 Y2, B
b1 O ti0 00 0 ° E
\.04,
'° 4L eO - 6 C Pig 1y 'fl 0 6 12 1 .o
\0 b ya O O /moo Oq \e \y9 7400 14 b I ee
o F 0203 5 / i O 6 8489 755 0
M30—L 3 98s�5 100;s - ROA
a
°P� C h 6 ee
i 64
POND 7.63 AC 1616 h° 7.5a s
9 4
8 1150.
!O ,� 1,g76
-0 8�p4
8
Co !! z2 7
POND 9, * 15011 9,
55000 . 0
IM30—L 3 5904 Q SSR EP____ � •7 M P
/ ane
D4e.1z
� 9
NIN 900
j60
0
s M PS�e��NE Fp
f
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE:
z
S T,
""n
4
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 30 LOT: 0001 SUFF-
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0011 VINNIN STREET
77777AS5ESSET), 4RER -,hECl-YTTfW)MAS
10
aags
2,
�,�Xx V,",&
"NANCY , "' "", n,� ll�;.� 'I, # , - ,
B
N, V as 12
9 a 11
ROPeRTYtADDRES
PIA
Ll
10 2
0 It 4
— 30 000.1 00,11 VINNIN STREET KELLY THOMAS R 183 TEDESCO ST L5
12 MADO-1 EMEAD-M, 16
_�, NAMCY-Sl 04-9-45
13
I*V
�,Jd-Will -DES,
14 "1 4 V -:Sl COT4T��RENAT&$-�-� ;, �-0,"
4. Q OlqkRAUSt�W[ �. A' o
il 0,4s, F x -'va,
YJ
�s,-Q Vt e I
1W e" A t K X nn
A 9�1 0 00 A g? n00'2- 42 E-D&S C. P-0 N'D p-I gA r.Pa U42 OKDl9E;RL-d'E FIRF'W11 i
• 'S MARBLEHEAD MA 01945
30 0003 803 0003 TEDESCO POND PLACE UJ KRASKER GERALD 2 OCEAN AVE
.......... KRASK&R-JAN&
77- lRSCiz"TT-.MA-0;1-9,0.
�,,SWAP
DESCO
30 '6,��,PdA
boks z�.;PoN;
4-aTE ONU`PLACE' U ESF 4,�,T x
aX
A�WX,9,453,
'�IPMRPLEHEAD�.M
0-0603, 80 '140' -P6AC
21'41"
5�4�-D&SGO P.....
2 MARBLEHEAD PIA 0.1945
3 30 0003 806 0006 TEDESCO POND PLACE 16 PAGLIARO STEVEN A 14 PILGRIM RD
4 RAGL,IARq7,�CARpL,A PJA.R8LEHEAD_P
a30 001 "7'% '.04"'POUD PLe,�U VW�3 m
33 ,�807�� 0007�, TEDESC6�PON D ,PL 'ERS 41ARVEN"A' ,,,TEDESC
6
/4 w s, 02
Ml
t o'c*,u
��1�A�l I
000
7 p) c
AR -T�
a JOANNE MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 F
30 0003 809 0009 TEDESCO POND PLACE U9 BRATTON WILLIAM J 9 TEDESCO POND PLACE U9
P16-01-9-4.5
SCO ""PL�WIG
C ,'POND,
TEPHEW 'lf,z,-�,,"FK*,
tbt§cb,!pOND ' PL:.ACE 'U�l�O�����'e""" ,CURL-EY,,,,S,
2,¢
,�sm
�,�-�PIARBLEHEAI&',WA, 0-1�2,45 a �,t �x
4 m 41
'30-9
3: 2 o6sC6Lp-&iq.6.2p&-,A,6 �*R XA
4 MARBLEHEAD PIA 01945
30 0003 812 0012 TEDESCO POND PLACE U12 SAL.KUCCI RAFFAEL.E 12 TEDESCO POND PL. U12
PIARBLEHEAD-MA-0,1,9-4.5
7 'T
C.
PLA U43,
0003,gl';j 0013, t -'RAGAWSCO
36 EDESCO P046'
w V -0 'pQN
39' 0003-L8414 ���'4'004L4a-�Ti"E�DESCO..LP-ON-D-.-P-LA-C -Cb E��EA-R- - ' ?i , - ,,pr!N npl?�vj
SAG
MARBLEHEAD PIA 01945 4
1 30 0004 0003 PETER/ROAD RAYNES JOHN H JR 3 PETER RD
2 LEANOR B SALEM PIA 01
3 ll:''l I
�M`6
obb 0026 CHANDLER ROA
�,,CHANDLIER
We
4
�,NANCY S"',
!,C8AN-MER-v&D
716* !n n A.D—,,
2 AMDLE&�R�0
6 THAIS S SALEM PIA 0.1970
30 0011 0010 PETER ROAD BENOIT PAUL L SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
a BEN-Cil-T-KATY .E.,SAI' EPI PIA 0-1970
0086 -`RST
'g
............
0
0 1
s@
"'x
2
41
2
2
321
2
3
-HEJZXL-A
3 N.N
4
7
3 71
4
�7
3
S
ICIH E S
-4
t