50 VALLEY STREET - ZBA 50 VaLLEY St. R-1
Diane Redican
14�
ofttlPm, ttssttthuse##s
L, t
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEONARD & DIANE REDICAN
FOR VARIANCES AT 50 VALLEY ST. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held May 14, 1986 with the following"Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Richard RTrAl, Secretary; Messrs. ,
Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the' heari was sent to abutters and-
others and notices of the hearing were properly pu I1smed `ii1 Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests variances from lot size,. frontage and density to redivide
parcel into two lots and to construct a single family dwelling on Lot #84. Also
a Variance from side setbacks on Lot #85.
The Variance which has been requ%sted may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally -
affect other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and
after viewing the plans, makes the Following findings of fact:
1 . The two. lots in question are over 12,000 square feet each and
were purchased as individual lots prior to enactment of the Salem '
Zoning Ordinance;
2. After clarification of the plans to abutters no opposition
was voiced.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes .as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the land involved
and which do not generally affect other lands in the same district;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involved substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
H
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEONARD & DIANE REDICAN
FOR VARIANCES AT 50 VALLEY ST. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, .the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief
requested, provided that:
1 . The driveway for the house on lot 84 may not come closer than
ten (10) feet of the southerly lot -line;
2. The driveway must be pitched away from the property toward
the street and away from abutting lots;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTED
x:
Richard A. Bencal, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF T4E h1P.SS.
APPEAL FRbi! THIS DECISION. IF ATIY. SH0.LL BE MADE
FILING
LAYS, CHAPTER 808, AND . SHAALL 6E FILED ViITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE 0
OF THE CITY CLERK. ycR`,l` C' cP,rl: P`R;IIT
6EtiERAL c-,,,:^IG THE P'T.
.. OF THIS DECISION W1 THE AfiiCE '� SECIiOiJ 11 TH c _ -
. CrP,ERAI LA.:J^ CHAPTER B COY CF Tuc rc A. "- F
❑_� i HAS E�.i LED.
. ._POct 'T-TO d ASS Av0 N HIED IS .
c✓LL NOT TA'.E EFF DAYS HAI\E ELAPSED c irSED OR D:
GRA':T—D IT H�.o LcG� DI-" ° THE GYJ TIER -
FIC0.T10:I CF THE CITY LAF?' TNS.: B A,D INDE.ED
.3Pt� y UgCEC THE NAJ;,E OF
i AN HAS BEEN FILE. THAT TITLE.
GR THAT. IF SO':` iUiH FSSEX RE'::ISTRY OF DEEDS
RECOORE�OINN 6 RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OVIKFR'S CERTIFICATE OF
BOARD OF APPEAL
� y.co Nr b 'KY tu of "ittlem, fflassac4usietts
,� �uGlic �rupert� �elt�r#meat
s
�''A��, " ^�Illtl�[ll[7, �F�JFIrtllteltt
(Ione 'isalcni (6rrcn
7.15-0213
William H. Munroe
Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Ass't Inspector
Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector
Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp.
March 17, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
RE: Variances at 50 Valley St. (R-1 )
(Assessor's Map 14, Lots #84 & #85)
I, William H. Munroe, Zoning Enforcement Officer for the
City of Salem, certify that, in my opinion, the three (3)
conditions of the Variances granted May 14, 1986 by the Salem
Board of Appeal and recorded in Essex South District Registry
of Deeds, Book 8527, Pages 576 and 577 concerning the above
entitled property have been satisfied. a
Sincerely,
William H. Munroe
Zoning Enforcement Officer
WHM:bms
cc: City Solicitor
Board of Appeal
file
(E sod 852M576
DECISION ON. THE PETITION .OF.LEQNARD & DIANE REDICAN
FOR VARIANCES AT .50 VALLEY ST., .(R=11
HAY 2? II 9 ply leo
A hearing on this petition was held May. 14, 1986 with the following �oard
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Richard Secretary; Messrs. ,
Fleming, Luzinski and Strout::°Notice.of the hearsp� was sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly pu5'l sftfed `ih; tt�.Jt�m Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests variances, ,rom lot siie, frontage and density to redi.vidE;
parcel. into two lots and to construct a single family dwelling on;Lot'#84. h},,so
a Variance from side setbacks bn Lot, #85. o
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the r
Board that: - a
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or ,structure involved and which are not generally
affect other lands; 'buildings- and structures in the same district;,
b. literal enfor6ement.0f, the- 15rovisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial
n-
volvesubstantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be•. granted 'without. substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from t8
intent of the district.'or the• purpose, of the. Ordinance. p
0
The Board of Appeal, after hearing',the evidence presented at the hearing and.
after viewing t66.:Plans, makes' the following findings of factco:
cfl
. 1... The two lots in question are over 12,000 square feet each and
were, purchased as individual.'lots prior to enactment of the 'Salem
Zoning Ordinance;
2. . After clarification.of the plans to abutters no opposition
was voiced.
On the 'basis of the above findings ,of fact, and on the evidence presented at .th'
hearing,. the Board of Ap'peal .concludes.as follows:
1 . . Special conditions ezist,'whicb. especially affect the land involved .
and which do not .generallyraffect other' lands in the same district;
2. Literal enforcement .of the:provisions of the. Zoning Ordinance `wouYd
' 'ards
p
hi ' to. the petitioner•;: .
i
involved
substant al h
3. The relief, requested, may 'be.granted without substantial detriment' to. .tt;e
public good and:without .null.ifying or. substantially ,derogating from th
intent of the 'district;gr 'tWi:,-purpose. of the Ordinance.
Book '.852716577
y X DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LEONARD DIANE RIDICAN
FOR VARIANCES AT 50 VALLEY., ST*.,, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0,. to grant the relief
requested, provided that:
1 .
The driveway for •the house ,on lot 84 may not come closer than
ten (10) feet of the sduthe.rly lot line;
2. The driveway must be pitched away from the property toward
the street and away. from abutting lots;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy-
must be. obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTED
Richard A. Bencal, Secretary
'A COPY OF THIS DECISION? HAS'. BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
'• URSUAtR TO SECTION 11 OF THE MASS. -
` �E, 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
SHALI,BE MA . IN
. IF ANY. K17H _
N. LED R:xR
1
p F E
.SALFROM..;{tC DECES ,AND SHALL THE c OR SPECIAL P . .
o - :U,WS. CHAPTER HE Of GIN••CLERK. THE VARIANCE CERT-
.6FTHI. {µ THE OFFICER SOS• SFC710N 11• DECISIC= £'BE 7RE .
OF 7H15 DECISION JS•.OF{pP7E OF THE L µpg BEER FILED. '
L.�S, GENERAL AA+ UN L.A GOP•Y NO APPEA
TO 7 TAICE EFFECT AND DENIED IS
V SNAIL NO AYS.HAVE EIA BEEN OjsmtSSED GR AAIE OF THE OWNER
PSED
ID NEREI• • CLERK?HAT %O P HAS
µ.AN APPEAL BISTRY OF DEEDS:AND INDEXED UTE OF TITLE-
FICA7{pNOF THE CRY NPS BEEN;FIFE.7HA7R.
CA PtAr. IF
EX -
RfCDRDED II THE RSojgg ECORDED
Date
NOT ON 7,HE OWNER.
CERTIFlG
BOARD Of APPEAL
Dale July 23 1986
1 he certify that 20 days have., exoire'd,'.
frcn the nate this instrument vvas '.received,
cnd that NO APPEAL has been filed in this
office.
A True Copy _ Mass
ATTEST: ' C CLE Salem,
,.PETITION FOR VARIANCE AT LOT 84
\ ' 50 VALLEY STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
�pft
Jf
We. the undersigned, support the grant of'a variance by the City of Salem
Board of Appeals allowing Leonard F. & Dianne M. Redican to construct a single
family home at #50,:Valley Street Lot 84 ,
s.
e ature Name(Print) Address
6 N
C� C^
J,
f
is /'•i i1I/ l
,7 aa r �
w:
S /
' ,O I , �k
R
t'6Ti!i0NJ UR VARIANCE AT LUr OAF
<<4 5C ,VALLEY STREET
Continued SALEM; .MASSACHUSETTS
TI!
Page 2
`tt Name(,Si�gn�ature) Name Print Address
k
°:1
t,
y
Me
rl,
�.✓cam' /.,c� S—
�
L
LUc/t ,✓ FEcrEi L 17 e,l�ti ST
.sr
t
f
t
ek'4 A/ O P 4 41Y O /N -S / 0f"% M'4 SS. ��N OF
q� $�
eu,.ar o n7 g WILLLIAA4 yG�
LEO N /C 0 F, Dl-1 v NE M. R / C CLARKE9721
H
-rg wSft¢ CrmT. ,./e. A&IZ.9 - 9No.s SoEp „{ao
60'400411-LY RPGK. 8'22• moy 2.-a $ 2 fps/OgLLAIiD�'J't•
vLA.v 856-5f' 65441 C, 5696 ` ✓ �f�•,��
. PLAN FoR (dulLD /N4 /�t,Z pO S6S
LO GqA/ FeIG lAleex/N6SL)P.
.Sd/• oSay
� N4 .CRc�µo�3
e
1 „MA P
Lt-r72 !l7'S `` , r1IJ1lRPf•.T.. 1\FhLTY C6RP•
------
` I
' I nerQ
. - ECoi✓D DA'RCtL -
a LOT BH •/7e 3P
r9�p►/q
Cot
8,3
{5av;o P. 17e�+reG
iy
i �'. LOT 8/► -.
P.ovLT.
r ,, s ,. = .PRD?eJra �•� •, _.-
,
/e m ✓..rs /o '
1 ,
67
-14
i'y 1 1
• 3
r
e,.
� 7)
-
r
,y
m ` •
r i"T mr -s r �'• x ' .i sz
y�,-T•nes egii
J+ �O 00 •'�5, > : 6 O / c?° a a` 33 03 y t-/9^3�K $tYi' 'moi 7•-'' ^�O �G
N.
.E t�a r� ✓ t ..
4
VIA :L. L E Y' STRCET .