36 UPHAM STREET - ZBA 36 Upham St. R_2
Byron & Donna Locke113
c�
4 \
\1 \
E
7
El El
1
El
O
r
YYY
I �
i
Q �
5 �
x
O
J 1
O �
v
n I�
El
` 1 o a
21, � �
J �
rt
J
J E El
El
El
b �
%
o
k
T �
0
5 I
a-Ni7 ,�y�oy
J
YEI
0
N
o w
I
ztp
9�
KD
Z
D J
V
0
0
Q �a
J
- j
\ El
11 El
I
i
i i \
V
El D
1 � h
I
5 �
x
J �
I
v
El
f _
0 0
Za � �
m
y
1
u°A/ -�
Elr
\ � r
X � z
� � y
c
� r
b
' a
I
I
J
s !
� \ I
0
N
ZO
Ztp
r
0
o
�d o
� q
� V
---
C-4 .Q/L
'y 1c /Cool'
I N4
0
0
Q \a
1 �
d �
I El El
I E
1 Lj
o I
I
aQ
I �
Q �
I �
X
o �
i
c/ W,ogl
: f
F-I
C
i
I
I
I
v
I �
i
i
I
o
' - i
J q
El
J
No
j;
\ tJ
i
i
El
O�
a
x
I �
o �
. I
J
El
� n
J �I
0
N
i
Ztp
v /L e o.tit
a
ooe
\ �I
}
� � J
Mo ~1
l p ci
cN1MPAC 71'
c-Z t- 2
1c 2001-
IN
0
0
Q� \a
(Citi of --`551em, 'Massadjusetts
Buttra of ?,aP /G
�Y
J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen
O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of two (2) full size dormers which will encroach on the
front and side setbacks, the property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
T
n more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . The petitioner purchased the property in 1993.
2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3 . The building had been vacant for about two years .
far 10 3 22
C�r'r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE c ,5
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM
page two
4. The roof is deteriorated and in need of repair.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained.
Special Permit Granted
April 27, 1994
Step en Touchette, Acting Chairman
Board of appeal
3 22
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE rli,' r,; _
FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM ` y
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
(1itu of 'Salem' �fflttssadjusetts
Pottrb of ' pFvral
MAY 18, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF MAY 10, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF •THE .CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF TWO FULL SIZE DORMERS AT 36 UPHAM STREET.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A,�mve.
ailpm. r �s��thus�t�s
-0 THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
e Cmaersianed reor sent tha e i- are .7.e owners cf a certain parcel of land lor�tgd
Flo.U/� 9�✓. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ztreet'. Zonino District./L:.(.'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -no - --id Darce ! affected by ectionisi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. :,assacnusetts State Buildino Code.
-tans cescribing the work proposed, have been siomitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
vccorcance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Application for Permit was denied by the inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons :
�,Pa�os'�'� �U�J''��vC�c� � �i/o �v//.Ii��� c✓a�,yL'�l•
�"rl C loAc�ES b�! 5. X le�gCA_y
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Cade and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code fa&
the following reasons:
- cn
(T L7
'
Owner K4!?. . �lQ!1/j4, Cra e .F� . . .
r�
Z3
. . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. l o�� 7`q ��.�`=.'/�h:. . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. Vf""' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.,ddress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ate. . .- 9 . . . . . . . . . -elephone.'- A'l.. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-nree ccoies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
.Dpeals .,ith a check, for advertisina in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
our weeKs prior to the meeting of `_.*,e Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
`venins flews.
— - /0/Lo ;r—�
0
Ar-
El
El El
D EJ El El E
i
c/�l�Ft.N J T ff�Lz�,.i
V
I�
El
I
GoiJJ rKvuTi e.J /yATi1,�t,,4�,
To 18.e- -i.X d' v r/
SOL./O .�xilTi�f
81051 Pec_R .
I i 0 N
i OGG/
i o �
70i�
o
I �
J
.1
Z I
v
.0
oe
4
c
N
� , Ll ✓i � 5 a r 3 v/N11v,
rK
U \
o
---..
�9
42 -3
r
ASSESSORS ' MAP 27, LOT 355
PLAN IS NOT TO BE USED FOR TITLE INSURANCE
7SES NOR FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROPERTY LINES. ZONING." R-2
REFERENCES."
DEED BOOK 4728, PAGE 208
PETER A CASALE
*4ot
(BOOK 5763, PAGE 133) s
�B9F9l�g4 5r,9 _
I GARAGE
5.6 `
v
c (.0
w /� a
Qo 5•Z cs i io
0
WpwLL
2.9 sD EIG J
I
y
° � 1
`t ro 136 m o S!n` S9 ro rritG ro i
O v
UPHAM 5TREE�THI
(PUBLIC UNKNOWN WI
I
PLOT PLAN
OF LAND IN
THAT TCERTIFY
E FDMELL NG SHO N HEREON IS SALEM, MA
LOCATED ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN AND THAT pREPAREO FOR
THE LOT COVERAGE 8Y BUILDINGS IS 25%.
�� � o
�Y Jja. �00
046 rj.
,ti s
D 310 a :;
.20i j.
O SCH40
16016\� �ae93 k . 0�
• Q� �e 0 '� ., dl�; I IWb F ,
�h
�\'►'ti°l� • � 9 dye � $' � '� � a .
a •
y
�Al
p�0
2pp � v�� �� g 'o•,yp � PQO... A
' O
v 'r a 'C� �O' ryahy° I�r ��0 • t
"Oo
V C
1 \� tiapp 0
�\ p� A`ti
10 6 ,,,, �(n�0 c • \ �, i,
lhap 'l5\ 4p e° 6 s
p toop )610
p ,`�,Og ��!� 90 0 v � �� S
ti
CI Y OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by BYRON AND
DONNA LOCKE for a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow
construction of two full size dormers at
36 UPHAM STREET(R-2).Said hearing to be held
.WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE
SALEM GREEN, second floor.
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman
April 13, 20, 1994 SN40170
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by BYRON AND
DONNA LOCKE for a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow
construction of two full size dormers at
36 UPHAM STREET(R-2).Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE
SALEM GREEN, second floor.
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman
April 13, 20, 1994 SN40170
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>1ftt1Pm, ZIS°sttLl?1iSPffS
'BIIarb of 'kyprai
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-he unaersigned re resent hat he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land to atd
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ct et; 'onin is ric S r
re a D' t t
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ---no said Darcei s affected by Sectionisj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
;r �-L ;Idssachusetts State Building Code.
Tans cescribing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accoraance with Section IX A. l of the Zoning Ordinance. 1
7L'0�� SF c✓02/�/f eS
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons: ^ �
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code,fo�g-
the following reasons: �_7�
r� rcs'A
rn
-n
f:'I
:'n c 3
T
U 1 KE
e� KE
® p
r— OwnerCl.,//�f`�!7 F. i?G?/�i1 d. . . . . ��� . . . . . .
r r Address �T . . l7
Telephone. (:SPf).7•f -. .. . . . . . . . . . . .
0etitioner. .Cry!`?4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
address . .4rgi'� ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-'ate.�J-,3/.-.ri.' . . . . . . . . 7elephone. .�9!`?�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
;ppeais with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
lour Weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
-� -
- = o
- = Z
z r -
G
'.PPFP.L ';,;SE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chi of �ttiPm, ��H�zssttthusPtts
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
". Undersigned repr sent tha he s are the owners of a certain parcel of land to t
-he
o. . . . .12(o.U��hfl ff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
y Section(s )o is ric :. . .
street; Zoning D� t t.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ana said carcei , s af" c e by S nis ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ane :,Iassacnusetts State Buildina Code.
d ans cescribing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accoroance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
,J't0vC/iOi
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons : `
�.Pa�os'E"�✓ C'D�J''�vC�ia� v� �i�/o �v/�.T/��' c'o'P�1�'�l'
,e5l C Co 4 C,I S-, b-1 5��IZ e�gCAeT
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws .and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code farms
the following reasons:
LU
cT s
-n
o� cts
O� cn
2
O
Q CD W
UJ
W u
r > OwneryK.�!?. .�P!117!. .F�
m " Address 3 U�? .°� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Telephone7�rq=-i`c iF.55 . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. n � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
add ress . . . c Jam!% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ate. . . �- i � . . . . . . . . -eIephone.�rlll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
,opeais ,with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four ,weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals . Check payable to The
venina News.
_ - -
�1 � -_ _ _
.J
Z � n Z Z
C ) Z F ..
_ - � Z
Z N. - _ > ^.
n C O � >
- < L �.
Z C
C
� �
D O
� � �
Titu of -itttem, 'Massadlusetts
peal e
ll
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen
O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of two ( 2) full size dormers which will encroach on the
front and side setbacks, the property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . The petitioner purchased the property in 1993 .
2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. The building had been vacant for about two years.
M,4 r 10
3
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE q ss
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM
page two
4. The roof is deteriorated and in need of repair.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained.
P Y
Special Permit Granted
April 27, 1994
6� )-Pn'J C4�-�'
Step en Touchette, Acting Chairman
Board of appeal
ky 22
7 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE r; :• ;_ _
FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM ;;,q
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
Yl ,
e� ClLitu ofuiem, � H�ssrzcltusetts
-3oura of Appeal
�Y
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen
O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of two (2) full size dormers which will encroach on the
front and side setbacks, the property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal,' after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. The petitioner purchased the property in 1993.
2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. The building had been vacant for about two years.
far 10 3 22 Pij 134
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE "'.3s
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM
page two
4. The roof is deteriorated and in need of repair.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained.
Special Permit Granted
April 27, 1994
Step en Touchette, Acting Chairman
Board of appeal
phr !G 3 72
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKS
FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM c
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
of -'Salem, �Nassarlluscite
30 ;
4 Bnttra of �Au}rettl
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET (R-2 )
A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen
O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of two (2) full size dormers which will encroach on the
front and side setbacks, the property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
in more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. The petitioner purchased the property in 1993.
2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller
use of their property.
3. The building had been vacant for about two years .
Nar 10 3
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM
page two
4. The roof is deteriorated and in need of repair.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction. .
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained.
Special Permit Granted
April 27, 1994
Step en Touchette, Acting Chairman
Board of appeal
t'tt7 i 3z �?
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF BYRON & DONNA LOCKE
FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT 36 UPHAM STREET, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
S DATE OF HEARING
ZA7lqZ
PETITIONER �yn /1dYVi?a
LOCATION V/1 13 6 /C J
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRAN DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
OO GARY M. BARRETT V
ALBERT C. HILL
STEPHEN O'GRAD_ ^
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS I�
NINA V. COHEN
ARTHUR LEBRECQUE
CONDITIONS:
-7 Z,
Z
�3
�� i
NOTE- ASSESSORS ' MAP 27, LOT 355
THIS PLAN IS NOT TO BE USED FOR TITLE INSURANCE
PURPOSES NOR FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROPERTY LINES. ZONING- R-2
REFERENCES.'
DEED BOOK 4728, PAGE 208
PETER A CASAL E
�4�NFj (BOOK 5763, PAGE 133) .
0 " a
c
q'rn aw.A
GARAGE
m>
�o
� cn
5.G
eti..
/zE�4
64
tiff � pyo
�a
ti o
Qm 5,7, 0\ o
i�
Qm
� o m
2 1/2 STORY
2.9 C6 WO DWELLINGAI
I J
0 '
i
#36 v o Slo
o
,Sce �/oma B90 of /P�7
UPHAM STREET
(PUBLIC - UNKNOWN WIDTH)
PLOT PLAN
I CERTIFY TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR OF LAND IN
THAT THE DWELL INS HEREON IS
LOCA TEO ON THE GROUNOOWN AS SHOWN AND THAT SALEM, MA
THE LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS IS 259.
PREPARED FOR
a e T a BYRON H. 6 DONNA L . LOCKE
NO. 7 SCAL E.' 1 " = 20 ' MARCH 31, 1994
M
DATE PRO SSIONAL ANG7URVEYOR Eo �o o Lp
/15A HANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
235 NEWBURY STREET-DANVERS, MA 01923
CHECKED BY.' 4989
0
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAG:'.111
QAI 17,1A nIIq7n
rt
. .............
2%
4 •
3
4
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 27 LOT. 0355 SUFF.1
PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0036 UPHAM STREET
A�qqf_qSrl) 61 111,111: ji I r Py o a
I
0
... ..............
9 .... ................
... . 1 121
10 ..
*11 27 U3.`:5 00J6 UPHAM STREET LOCKE BYRON 34 UPHAM ST ✓ 1
12 1 OrKE ricid, 1:
" '% I 1'%11 11!........ 17
I F'M
3
1JPH4P1 ST RILE Y; GLADYS',M 77:
19
bAl"Id Yc>
�PEA
%
20
is21
•
GREEN GLORIA J SALEM t-'(A 01970 22
17 27 034.5 0037 WALTER STREET GLISSON FREDERIC C 37 IJALTER ST
18 Tq1-1U*)1,f I T '.A A C. F-M 24
0 2
0039eWALTER�,,_,.$, -ASA E�'PEVER%A
MARY'
27 0,1 T,
•20
7j
IlA Y_le�Y
.. ...........
,�x,%...........
s.
%I I P'19"A.11 III 11ITIAM`R1%,, 4%, :LIAL IVR qT...........
22 NANCY SALEM MA 01970 2• 9
23 27 034.6 0043 WALTER STREET REAR DIXON PEARL 14 43R WALTER STREET 3�1
24 �'5AI FM MA Q-197n 32
...... 33
M 34
ART1N-,R(VE,.RT,,�Q
b Y
q
I
1 35
,l,SALE M;,,'MA GWEN D(X-YN, lE,%,
26
36
27
................
28 C)o JI&I SALEM MA 01970' 37
10 29 DONOVAN HELEN 1) 38
30 39
�7 0-354 0038 UPHAM STREET* LUNN PRISCILLA C 38 UPHAM ST
SA�,E,Pf NA 0-1970 4
3141
.........% .......
',0 11. IS T R E,E.,-f% I I,, L 0 Cf,E, B Y R QN, H I............... 1_1 I I 113AI I o",
42 Aft
`616Nh -L ............I
........... qw
3 -1- LEM %,MA'�`L;l 97
43
............... 44
4;...:..
A_RSF,,M1'(�j-
................
33
34 PAULA S SALEM MA 01970 45
35 46
47
36 48
37
............ ...... ....... 49
.......
38 50
.................... 51
521..............
...........
40 53
•41 54 0
55
42 56
43 ...... ........ ...........
T7
44
so
6.
•
.............
45 .........I .I..I.I .
............
46 61
62
47 :31
48 4
49
65
• ...........
........ . ... 66
17
........... I .....
50
............
51
52 BB
53 70
•
71
54 72
55
.I 1 73
TET; ; I;7 4
E Re' M.� ICAROA
W, .I I I I.1 1751
6ti o�-b ey;�V�'
r p ,qy off, o
pgp9�
p O
:0. oy ti
�• P d+ lh h 44 921/6 2P �•, . 9g
• V
cr
r • �y Q6yti1,
ti n0 Cpl bFZ /
' D Z
♦ O Y ih ob♦ 0 y
�a
4 9\y °s a'
py t q`Ce. s �P �9 '�� Pr r0 y��C♦ o ti�4e ti /
b d'�y yg,� • + NOV <
O uory. h. oy9°' et o Wil.
� w
'Q 6 Gp9w 4 aC °e obmos O
419 Eby d°
pyw g
10 .
.o afi
< w
L
s 'b