11 1/2 SUTTON AVENUE - ZBA 1112 Sutton fit (R-1
Robert Doyle (Owner)
McElwain (Petitioner) _
Ron Mclwa
�
1
t ,
f�iity of �ttlem, � usstt�ltusetts
Botts of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) , ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON AVE. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio,
Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming
structure to allow construction of an addition. The property is located
in an R-1 district and is owned by Mr. Robert Doyle.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions
set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations
and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes,
enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land,
structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental
than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit
will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the
City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact;
1. There was no opposition to the request.
2. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) ,ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON AVE. , SALEM
page two
3 . The abutter at 11 Sutton Ave. , the property most affected by this
construction, spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The proposed addition will not have a negative impact on the
neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and
may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant
the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing
structures.
5. A certificate of occupancy is to be obtained by the petitioner.
n
r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) , ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON STREET,SALEM
page three
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
February 19, 1992
/_ti.7✓
Francis X Grealish, Secretary
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17
of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall
not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification
of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been
filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been
dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and
indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted
on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
rC,J
c,�
ly
b (tlitt� of -�tttcm, ^fttssadlusetts
Boura of .�apeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) , ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON AVE. (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio,
Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming
structure to allow construction of an addition. The property is located
in an R-1 district and is owned by Mr. Robert Doyle.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions
set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations
and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes,
enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land,
structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental
than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit
will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the
City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact;
1. There was no opposition to the request.
2. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) ,ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON AVE. , SALEM
page two
3. The abutter at 11 Sutton Ave. , the property most affected by this
construction, spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The proposed addition will not have a negative impact on the
neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and
may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant
the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing
structures.
5. A certificate of occupancy is to be obtained by the petitioner.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) , ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON STREET,SALEM
page three
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
February 19, 1992
r
Francis X Grealish, Secretary
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17
of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall
not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification
of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been
filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been
dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and
indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted
on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
4J
^r
'=r
c�
v
qA (1�ity oftticm, � uSSUCIIusPttB
s -Snttra of ,A, p d
a
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) , ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON AVE. (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio,
Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming
structure to allow construction of an addition. The property is located
in an R-1 district and is owned by Mr. Robert Doyle.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions
set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations
and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes,
enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land,
structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental
than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit
will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the
City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact;
1. There was no opposition to the request.
2. The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very small.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) ,ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON AVE. , SALEM
page two
3. The abutter at 11 Sutton Ave. , the property most affected by this
construction, spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The proposed addition will not have a negative impact on the
neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and
may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant
the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing
structures.
5. A certificate of occupancy is to be obtained by the petitioner.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER) , ROBERT DOYLE
(OWNER)FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 1/2 SUTTON STREET,SALEM
page three
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
February 19, 1992
Francis X Grealish, Secretary
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17
of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall
not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification
of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been
filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been
dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and
indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted
on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
4a
^,e
c ,
�0
a Cita of ttlem, ttssttclluse#te
PattrD of Appeal
• r
March 4, 1992
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION
OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEENFFILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITII{ON OF RON MCELWAIN (PETITIONER)
AND ROBERT DOYLE (OWNER) FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW CON-
STRUCTION OF AN ADDITION AT 112 SUTTON AVE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
f20
rom this decision,if anY,shall be made pursuant to Section.l7 0
Lavr>� chapter 808, and shall be filed vrithin ce da s
808, Section 11,the\`aria eco
date of tiHn,y of tris decision in the office of the City C;e k•
Gene;zl Laws, Chap , rS'::;tt
r• here. snal' at talo err:.ct until a car r.'
,,: ., .....,. F_rnnt SrBente Cle,k that 2' �.-
;nc the certi4.cation cf the CPtY h
or that if u _
al has been ftlad,
,,,::p,that a has been ash sse
indexed under the name ord or denied is dth,rwlner of re-0o ur
ez;i=try of Deeds the owner's certificate of Titfa-
is MCC),,ed and noted an BOARD OF APPEAL
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIONERrjZj
LOCATION
MOTION: -0 GRANT �Q SECOND
r
TO DENY << SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
0 CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT
DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENGAL !�
RICHARD FEBONIO
FRANCIS GREALISH
�EDWAAD LUZINSKI /
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE [/
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
RONA PI NTJi
AR UR LABRECQUE
CONDITIONS:
C. D ,
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
T (Qtttl IIIttlr�m, {tt55ttL�i123P5
�,
J�L�6
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
he dnaersigned re eyy��nt .hat /,.�1 .re he owners T ertain oarcei or lana ioc�teq
-/• • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .treet: _Lnina Oistrict.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ana ta10 z3rcel 13 aTTeCT_e7 :)'/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Insoector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
S2 a
n e.•
-j' m o 0
C N
C2
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent Ind purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons: G_'i9/l
l�
g ,,m,o� out./ �"` ,� _ �• r >_
}
Owner. klgMll ►�o'.:�^:�.....
Address.&./ . . !r! .rtr�.......... .... ..
Telephone..'y —. 9./. ..... .. . .. . ..
Petitioner a ..... .• ••••
Address. .
Date. . 0 / "t71,2
. Telephone.. .9. . .�. .. ..�.b.
By. . .. ....l�..'..�r..i.•.L..•l.."0..•L.......
Three copies of tie application must be filed. with the Secretary of the Board of
hhf�e ......
Appeals with a c ck. for advertising 1n the amount of............. .. . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
JAN JO
PIT..
ASSESSORS MAP NO 45,`Lbr
ZOW/N&% R-1
REfERENaM
PLAJv BOOK ? PLA." 3.;
DEED BOOK 33", PAGE
SUTTON A VFJgH
50.0 (DEED)
PICKET W
FENCE w
1 1/2 STORY
WOOD-FRAME
3 DWELLING/ fRANpS J HlVALEN
(11� C) Q
WLUAM A do AIR/AM F. o o
BRESIVAHAN Q
o Q�'
/ Lci
%
Lj JANE CUNN/fFE oho
� VQ
o h 50.0 DEED _
PORCH``•, 6' POR 77ON
OF PORCH
/ / i TO BE'
LE REMOVEDSTOCKADE EXIS77NG PROPOSED
FENCE / , I I ; AD0177ON
WOW£LL1NG/ EXIS77NC
STORY
ADD177ON
50.0 DE ( TO BE
REMOVED )
71 WIRE FENCE
.. ...e07
7
SOPH/E
PLEti'NOCA
DIANE M. ROWAND MICHAEL D, CAR7ER
y
F''Mn .Si rC DIS^ Lq?'M !3. 4\Y 2N. F' G -;6 �, y �'."Rryq"' , NrvNi"... v-
�'VS'.v V f Yt eZ a .(vr�e rp h •C•-•�. ,� h,K.: if.�,,:, m_
__ y r t 'S0.='rt�jd r: h.' frya .y�, N �, ,mac k."&, i;•.FE ,v�
,SAF
t.__-1:y1 i�.' �, ;,`Y,+i�Zr� ..v.Y X 3 �� �?1 , l wyr��'X F'ts¢"' .. .. ' •sem,., y,v
ASSESSED LOT AREA = 1,750 t S.F.
CALCULA7E•D EXIS77NG LOT COVERAGE = 49.0.? MWIT E'EN
CALCULAMID PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE = 50.9% OF LAND X
4
CRAIG `
Var�AcU wa PREPARED FOR
iy K .p1 v {., fi SCS s: � y
.. �:'BONALD /QC
E:j
!4
FXSLSTING
�t
� � F1Eu kar.7�rsOnJ
�'•E�_.' � 1. �1t14' C f•Apl'•^R.RpS !0 7�as F"�� � ate. �
17 ��' Qd�srroN 4 Ric-aur�N
z'tir'o AZY5 zVrr-.v Arg c N ) S.
---• / / yao+ 'T4
a
oe
bb
Q r� y�\ oo t
7 ',.;s '' �y`h 6 �o� ° pyo `� '� � • A i r .a
0
,+ v. 0019 a9 610A 44 6 ° V
a }ys
o
Z9 AOs SZ50 6451 6555
Al, g\ 'n0 � °yam• �.
0 . o s� s
tic' t� 0 616 AyG
Ci AS
A `
5610 g A100 .o° ��W l0da ,
9A50- 69
•�
� � \��. s ,, V • G `�� V.t\ 1150 '(5 5• �'° ,\ ,��'"°
Al IJ
0 t00 200 800 400 500 FEET
�T�•95i9rnt"•F�•61� itidA�710!A' . -i /
CITY Or SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing tor all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by Ron McElwain
for Variance and/or special Permit to allow con-
struction of an addition at 11Y Sutton St. (R-1).
Said hearing to be held Wednesday,February 19,
1992 a1 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
February 5, 12, 1993 - SN75493
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by Ron McElwain
for Variance and/or special Permit to alloW con-
struction of an addition at 11'/, Sutton ebruary t9,
Said hearing to be held Wednesday,
1992 at 7:00 P.M. One Salem Green,
2nd floor.n
RICHARD A. BENCAL, SN75493
I ehruary 5, 12, 1992
CITY.OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 ESL. 381
Will hold a public hearing 1'0r all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by Iton McElwain
I'or Variance and/or special Permit to
allow con-
struction of an addition at 14b, SuttonFebruarR 119,
Said hearing to be held Wednesday, 5'
1992 at 7:00 1'.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor.
RIC14ARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
February 5, 12, 199-
CITY OF SALEM
' BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by Ron McElwain
for Variance and/or special Permit to allow cmi-
struction of an addition at I,,/r SuttonSt. (y 19,
Said hearing to be held Wednesday,
1992 at 7:00 P.M. One Salem Green, 2nd floor.
RIC,}LARD A. BGNCAL, Chairman
FebruarY 5, 12, 1992
T M Y'Y Y T T T T T Y Y T 4 4..Y
• 4 i 4 T Y i T Y M T Y Y Y Y Y.1
Ct;rY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by lion McElwain
1'or Variance and/or special Permit to allow con-
struction of an addition at III/, StiltoniFebruary 19,
Said hearing to be held Wednesday,
1992 at 7:00 PAI
}1One
I?O
A.m Green, 2nd BENCAL, Chairman
Pbbruary 5, 12, 1992 SN75493
i i'_iS. .�}_� i' M ! 4 T T 4 ! M
M ! ! M M Y T 4 ♦ ♦ • e Y M k.4 .
I
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of �UjgM �Nng5arhusPtts
9
�umm.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-he Undersigned rept sen that ::.-e is are :he owners or a certain oarcei of lana to ated
at fl0. . . .//. ;��2. . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `-treet-, Lomng District.�".j. .
and said parcel is affected by Seczionis ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
r
CD W
m O O
N [V N
W
Ld co
YK
W _
U_
O W
W
O �O
>_
C — 2
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
or
r
/,lc Gc e_ /�•, nuje� �( Owner. . . . . . . .
r�
Address. .. . .��. . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. .C��y/- A . .
Peti ti aner. :/.ry��
!( . . .. ... .. W�/!,. . . . . . .
n Address. . �� � % V `� . . . .
Date. . . .C1aAa . . . . . . . Telephone. . .�.'9 .�o�.�L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . .y �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
Y
µ r
j � w
I'PHINN 10BOARD I11 \1'11 APS 'n
i
1'I IIIInNIfK__....._.._ _.._._.....
a
ADDRI SS.__.. .
t ONDI I IONS ...
.............................................. ... ..............
_.........................................__.................. -
PEII1ION APPROVED.................... Q'
DENIED............ _ .........
.................................................... 19.........
CORRECTION
City of Salem
Board of Appeal
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested inttheppetition
submitted by by Ron McElwain for Variance and/or Special Permit to allow
construction of an addition at 112' SUTTON AVENUE (R-1 ) Said hearing to
be held Wednesday, February 19, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. , One Salem Green, 2nd
Floor.
Richard A. Benc al, Chairman
/`<�>h�.._`/�✓/CWS—" ��EI�G`�4.I/1/e// ���
71
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' (gift, Lif 5ajrm, C4fttssarhuseffs
�Rnarb of �A}rpett!
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned ;jMn thatp.� are the owners or a certain oarcei of lana lac to
at flO. . .l���kL . � . ..Pf—C. . . . . `tree t; =mina District. -i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and <_aid oarcei is affectea by Secticn( s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
T _ <c m o e
U
4a.i7J'*i
UJ, O W
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent nd purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons: Gt�i9// � � LA�JQJ
0� 10
r— 0 Owner. .1 . .
!� . . . :. . . . . .
Telephone. . y . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner.°Ca?t. J.!GC . . . . . . . . . . .
Add ress. .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . .�D"— J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . /.�L .��f . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
m
a
P
a
I
L` t
t _
--
ti
y —
is 1
a � f
U I.
NJ
� a o
ti
Q4) ,
�+ z `
z g
T -
o f
rn OOD
.T
es 0 m '17 t4
OL0
z
f
�a
r�
i
i
i
v- 3
s a.
! o
a 3 a
14A
x
cry
o
'a
dc
Q lr
Ll
}: !
Z
o Lt!
y,
f �
0
y- 3
1
14J�
44
�46 o
Uo `�
1s �
0 v
I k
,n
Q
e a�
<U o
o �
a tSi
Ail 30 /0 18
�C���'
ASSESSORS MAP NO 45;EL'OT J CF
ZOV/Na R-1
REFERENCES
PLAN BOOK 7, _PLA.;AN 30
DEED BOOK 33"1 PACE .'79
SUTTON - A VENUE
50.0 (DEED)
PICKET W
FENCE o ^10
o� / Q�
�'I 1 1/2 STORY Q`
WOOD-FRAME
3 ND FRANCS J. WHALEN
W WAM A & M/R/AM F.BRESNAHANJANE W Q�0
0
�i 50.0 DEED OG
STEPS l
W PORTION
N O PORCH`.( 16 OF PORCH
( TO BE
REMO QED )
STOCKADE EX�S SING 110 !
PROPOSED
2 STOR OFENCE � • !'� �. ADDITION
WOOD-FRAMh oDWELLING/ N h EXISTING
# 17 7/2 n 1 STORY
76' t ADDITION
4 f 50.0 DEED 4' f ( TOMOVED BE
RE )
WIRE FENCE -
SOPH/E F/
PLEGYNOGA
DIANE M. ROWANO MICHAEL D. CARTER
F/171 r77�79
ASSESSED LOT AREA = 1,750 .t SF. E �1T' PL
CALCULATED EXISTING LOT COVERAGE = 49.09
CALCULATED PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE = 50.99
OF LAND IN
CAM4 MA
P.AIG 1✓
ae
A.
vANcU PREPARED FOR
No. 36127
sseRONALD McELOr"
- "--- --------- -- -- - -- SCALE I" = 2O' JANUARY 28, 199?
REGISTERED !PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
,�ANCOCK SlTf�VEY ASSOCIATF.s; INC.
2 ELECTRONICS AVENUE, DANVERS; MA
NO TE: F ----- — --- -----
THIS PLAN NOT TO BL- USED FOR TITLE C 10 20 40 80
INSURANCE PURPOSES, NOR FOR
RECONSTRUCTION OF BOUNDARY LINES. CHK. 9Y 4457
FRANCIS S. GREALISHr JR.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
60 WASHINGTON STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(508) 741-2211
TO: Brenda M. Sumrall
FROM: Frank Grealish, Jr .
DATE March 3 , 1992
RE: Petition of Ron McElwain Heard February 6 , 1992
No. 6 on the Agenda
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented .at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition to the request.
2 . The increase in size requested by the petitioner is very
small.
3 . The abutter at the
property most affected by this construction, spoke in favor
of the petiti^^ons�
,tn GL tiGev�
4 . The will not have a negative impact on the
neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of facts , and on evidence
presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as
follows :
1 . The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be
substantially detrimental to the public good and will not
nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2 . The Special Permit requested can be granted in harmony
with the district and will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants .
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unamimously, 5-0
to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following
conditions:
1 . The petitioner shall comply with all city and state
statutes , ordinances , codes and regulations .
r
FRANCIS X. GREALISHe JR.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
60 WASHINGTON STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(508) 741-2211
Brenda M. Sumrall
March 3, 1992
Page 2
2 . All requirements of the City of Salem Fire Prevention
Bureau relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly
adhered to.
3 . The petitioner shall obtain the approval of any City Board
or Commission that has jurisdiction over this petition.
Special Permit Granted February 19 , 1992 .
'Francis X. Grealish, Jr .
Member Board of Appeal
TM
BOA01:5� ASSESSORS 0
CITY' ALL PAG I--': YXI
2 nary
2
92 .....
3
T, F'IED,",
-CER, AS s
3 j VTTf S1%�L-1 4
4 5
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 45 LOT. 0037 BUFF.
PROPERTY ADDRESS. 11,011 Slyr-l'ON I
a
7
.... .....
9P"
10 R' :3
•11 4
12 45 0037 0011 SLITT014 AVENUE 112 DOYLE ROSERI- 11 SW-TON AVE is
Is
, t�Al Ell W4 uw-za
13 17
bd
' ... 'I "I FOW
R 0 D N E
14 07 SU
.I I I I I ....I.
15
20
16 21
SALEM MA 01970
•17 22
18 45 (31)38 0011 SUTTON AVENUE CONNIFFF. JANE I:1 S(ff"l-ON AVF.'.' 23
r) 24
IGII V6;A KA444� E-
f 0
""--45,,(30J9., I Aml iA
20 AVE) P R-ESN AHAN L4i E(I
U I�"',�,". - , I
• .......................
27
21 .I..I..I
44p . ..............
22 29
23 SALEM MA GIT-70 wo
45 0046 0103 COLUMBUS AVENUE JEAKINS SANDRA W 103 COI OMBUS AVE 31
24 71 1 L41 E;A .Ill MA Q 70 32
33
25
L 3G& Hl F
1P Q) .
3
•26 4
U a.14'70
I.I`.3
27 .I....I I I
........ ....... ...I.. 361
BEA' Cl I
28• 37
29 C/O PURNS DIANE SALEM MA 0-1970 380
45 0051 0111 COLOVISUS AVENUE CARTER NICHAEL D Ill COLUMBUS AVE 39
30 40
31 41
'45�C .......
....... 42
•32
43
............%.............. ........
......................
%, " � %, . , e%I I 44
1..1
............
33
...........I....... .......I .....I. •
34 45
•35 4
4
36 4
37 ......
49
.................
038 ......I..I I..
...........I,I ...... ....
50
5,
•
31
............. ....... 52
............... .
40 53
•41 54
55 0
42 56
43
58 0
•44
..I..I....I I....
....I... 59
45
48 61
•47 620
83
48 64
65
50 67
51
52 60
•53 70
71
54 72
FR�41.��CARDN%'
r77777=
777--77,
55 1 E
•5617 1 1.I I. .I
CITY n,
ASSESSORS MAP NO 4.5, i6P 37;I:
ZON/NG? R-1
REfEREN�
PLAN BOOKf1, PLAN 30
DEED 300,K'337,4 PAGE 179
Sb=N A VENUE
PICKET 50.0 (DEED)
FENCE �0
VI/1 STORY Q`Q
�.� W000-FRAME �
FRANaS
DWELLINGS J WHALEN
#
WILLIAM A & M/R/AM F. C3a
ORESNAHAN Q
0
JANE CUNN/f FE
N �! g P
h 50.0 DEED �V
STEPS7-7
/
PORTON
N PORCH''.( 16' OF PORCH
( TO BE
p REMOVED )
EXIS SING
STOCKADE _ _ W PROPOSED
FENCE /? STORE ; ADDITION
,WOOD-FRAMEh o
DWELLING/ N h EXISTING
# 11 1/2 ; 1 STORY
10 16" t
4 DT
50.0 DEED ( TOIBE
'77] REMOVED )
WIRE FENCE
SOPH/E
PLEGYNOGA
0/ANE M. ROWAND MICHAEL D. CARTER
F/1777 F/77771
ASSESSED LOT AREA = 1,750 f S.F. EXHIBIT PLAN
CALCULATED EXISTING LOT COVERAGE = 49.09
CALCULATED PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE = 50.99
A f Y OF LAND IN
S"g MA
555
{g v VF.NCU IA� PREPARED FOR
pati
RONALD McELWAIN
- �Q ---- --- SCALE 1" = 20" JANUARY 28, 1992
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
HANCOCK SMEY AS.SOCL Mo INC.
2 ELECTRONICS AVENUE DANVERS, MA
NOTE• — -- - --------
TH/S PLAN NOT TO BE USED FOR TITLE 0 10 20 40 80
INSURANCE PURPOSES, NOR FOR
RECONSTRUCTION OF BOUNDARY LINES. CHK. BY 4'¢57
�_ r q q0. �S 3• � S �0�0
0
41.
bt
w 2 a0,, •. Q 6 435 655
9a_ ,9 � 3Z5. � 6 F� � 0� f f•
� < r
000
6
> 4%�0 'M1 i ry0, `� ' \ 0 y°`' ,73.f��/�•,�� ` fi�-:r r' ,:
^ 5
DW
0 61
n j3 '` (0�2g °y 6 0
000
�� Seto ae a�oo oa •,�.w: a� '"^,�"
�` Y - aa. � , � `o,.,o•.: t eq_. 50,. , 93 ..og� ��rx
69
.7
sB , ' 9 _ 6975 ,4. T /\P-
ay
jib
C 9T�0
0 100 200 300 400 300 FEET
_.:'4,.�k.•0'S� wi.:a'4,1f•,_ .�tv`}�.�?PE�"'�"�_-- '-''u-msz3i�:£?::7
✓ r�
G �- - - - -
i
i
- - - - �-- ----- ---I---- ---___----�---- _ - -
--- ----- --�-----_T____`- - - ---
------ _._- _.... .,....---------
nx 30 10 3s4�°,,
Y
MT �� 9�
ofi;
-- ASSESSORS MAP NOCS, LOT 37
ZONING.` R-1
REFERENCES.•
PLAN BOOK 1, PLAN 50
DEED BOOK 3371, PAGE 179
SI=N AVENUE
50.0 (DEED)
PICKET W
FENCE77
1 1/2 STORY Q`
""LFRAME �•
j DWELLlNG7 fRANGYS ✓. NtHALEN
W WAM A & MIRIAM F. # 11/ 000
o I C4
BREMANAN gyp-. Q�Q
0
JANE CUNNIFFE
N Qy
h 50.0 DEED 00
�� V.
PORT/ON
"Ni PORCH`',;' 16' OF PORCH
( TO BE
REMOVED )
G - - 'I W
STOCKADE 2 STORY p PROPOSED
FENCE 12 / ADDITION
WOOD-FRAM h o
DWELLING/ N EXISTING
11 1/2 1 STORY
10' 16' t -f
4 t 50.0 DEED 4' t (OTOI BE
REMOVED )
WIRE FENCE
F�
SOPN/E
PLEdNOGA
DIANE M. ROWAND MICHAEL D. CARTER
F/777
F/77777
ASSESSED L OT AREA = 1,750 t S.F. EXHIBIT, PLAN
CALCULATED EXISTING LOT COVERAGE = 49.09
CAL CULA TED PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE = 50.91T
OF LAND IN
�R�i vLPiJ7���8v .
F~ i
- CRAtG £�f( 3ALE9 MA
A. r,
VA.
No. 361G?27 + . PREPARED FOR
a w
(q�F�88�ONQ'A RONALD MCELOWN
v
--------- -5 - ` - - ----- SCALE 1" = 20" JANUARY 28, 1992
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SUP6IEYOR
, ANCOCK SURVEY ASSOCIATES; INC.
2 ELECTRONICS A VENUE, DANVERS MA
NOTE: -- - - --- -- ----- —
THIS PLAN NOT TO BE USED FOR TITLE C 10 20 40 80
INSURANCE PURPOSES, NOR FOR
RECONSTRUCTION OF BOUNDARY LINESCHK. BY LINES . 4457