Loading...
75 SUMMER STREET - ZBA 75 Summer St. R-2 Steven J. Navarro iiL 5 . Ctu of ttlem, � tt�sttt�use#ts s Pourb of �Vpeul DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN J. NAVARRO FOR VARIANCES AT 75 SUMER ST. (R-2) . Jut 9 SS A hearing on this petition was held May 28, 1986 with the fo q loOV 'K rd Members � present; James Hacker, Chairman; Richard Bencal, Sf"fary; Messrs. , Fleming and Luzinski. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Ev9{fiYnL1LNews iayaFj�gdance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A.. Petitioner is requesting a Variance to convert a mixed residential/store building into six residential units and a Variance from minimum parking in this R-2 zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in- volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The plan as submitted will be more in harmony with the area than the present use; 2. Support for the plan was voiced by interested and concerned residents and others; e 3. The building was vacant when petitioner purchased the property. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The property in question is unique to the area; 2. The desired variances may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good; 3. A hardship does exist not only to the petitioner but to the neighborhood in general. r�- DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STEVEN J. NAVARRO FOR VARIANCES AT 75 SUMMER ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, in favor of granting the Variance to convert a mixed residential/store building into six residential units subject to the following conditions: 1 . That five (5) units be two bedrooms and the unit, described as being the store front be converted to a one bedroom unit; 2. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. The Board of Appeal also voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Variance from minimum parking subject to the following conditions: 1 . A minimum of five (5) unobstructed parking spaces must be be maintained and the spaces must be delineated and set aside as such. VARIANCES GRANTED Richard A. Bencal, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION: 17 OF THE GENERAL LADS, ChAPTER SDS, AND SH-,LL U: PL4D WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER. THE DATE OF OF THIS DECISDN It, THE OFFICE OFT.-'-- CITY CLERK. PC.'•SACT ?0 :LASS t-ES`.RAL Lt.T:. . 'P.�PT:R f SEC?�''. R, THE VF.'!ANCE OC Gn::1.EO HEREIN, CH ALA NI-If ' E EFFECT „'•T',L A C:?Y Or THECi:L:7: •. `_�'.:!'�. 1. R , CE5, F. f1 : OF TB: 0_1 U'__HA THAT 20 D.4.;S .- E'er"i P.:.') N,'' IPv-zl F.;.^ E=L.: F:"D. THdT, IF SU:.;' ..: APPEAL H:S UEEN F LE. TAP" 17 .: EE=:( Cli ISSB CR 'REdC:?DED !II THc JU'R ESSE/. SEMTRY ?F 7c`D6 4f:D'I::DE'ED c.:Cz Tr.E .6, OF 1;,E OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON TrE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. II BOARD OF APPEAL I ------ ----- - _ � LOCUS --'oa P� � ti �J " , , • P h oilth ' E gyp p lv p 00 �. LOCU5 MOP sc4LE • - /s00 5 y00 as� 5E5025 MA Z5, L OF 6ZW1 N N , � � ZONIM5 IF Z - ZES1ORIFIAL DEED Iff BK 793Z , PG. Zse 3� 3 a ��� ���� BEll MMA/7K o � G NOTES' : SB. FD 3.q 1. BU/LO/N6 CONSTCL/CT/OV /S W000 F/ZAME W/r// CMIC/zETE FOUN04r/ON. s 2� Z. 6U/CO/N6 COMMM5 GUN F./TS NUMBE2E0 /- (o. _ N A2E! _ ¢�7, i 5' 3. 9LcNC9M,41?K• TOP SMNE BOUNO CO,P/VE SUMMER ST/ZEET AND END/COrr 5r/ZEEr. 9 6 p ELEVATION Z000 • C q 0 Sol r ��JCL . O v�2+•I/•�N� � � 0000 v _ O W ' C was s 7¢ 3(,.7 /4q,50 C IN '� 30 5 KOPpUL0S ICE/zT/FY T,4Ar ru/s FLAN CONFOffMs rO 3 O / KI 66g6A PLAN OF LAND TL/E /tC/LE,S AND /ZE6ULAr F ME IM6/STErC5 � � ANGE�� �N OF 10M9,S. FR qS�` JoEDERIC N N / 5 A L EM " FORS \`ss FCISfE0.E Qom''.. 01?CF42EL9 F02 F02 /ZEG/Sr/tY OFDEEOS USE � / C V �..� ( ' �j,L4 VA ,�\�O L tJ •4 SCALE l "= /O' MAY Z31 X96 Q SOT* 5� NANCOCK SUINEY A550CIATES, INC. / 69 NOZ7 A/ SrfEET 4M CIFS, MASS. NOTE•• DEED OIMEN-110A15 00 NOT ,462EE WITH P/�E� FIELD MIPM6Y4NO MONUMENTS OF OCCUP4T/0'V FEET 0 5 /0 ZO 40 Y I I 0 5 /0 METE/ZS 3075 Y'_...... r--• •�.v- -� '--]' 1. - _ T7-�1[y . 1'�--s - _ _ =..+•t . . _r.-.-:- -v -�--t ,?;. •••_ C ..'!-.�i# .... .° f- a r N' .. , '�-tom ir. as e. yy��r > . .. '�. f• /- - - • - V 638 EnJDlLOT7 S��CEE- ,('g.��ry TUsT //, � ../�EFS�cEv i /0,7C t J. CE VP-CrdKf nut_cs of MEASU2E 1> � r3ulk ` , \�\\\ + C'l�T�-+[,Tyr •� I � Q 11 i .'ra~' . •" � j 3J�o�y Co.ac//rcft 19toc.4 �`` w. �• � :r ISM �/oei' � Jl, /D//yE-PJ5 /oNS of LOT 4S •/`GA)SvZ[A 6Y DCC11P,9TIo•v oy 3 y, I Tkc' !aQOVNp Dl� 1J0 'T' AGQEE �` � (�� �i 1Jl•Y14 t_ OcL/S pti »v ,4 3 v . 7 l ,U G C%E E DS• A C O M PLE 7-C --- /NS'T'JZ V MEN T -50xz fF_• Y JS Y KFGOMriEN�E� Tc� pETMlNE S U M L- 0 T � _ i IjOVrv�a /�� CF Loc. Vs . f . �•g su c /� fin/ f� /' L o T n/vi �a�zS ee s sPOW/V 6 H L � "! , / 1 H S E v. CA) MAP /t �HR:Slop � Irl .. s MEL40 Su/(-, L,/ NC.31217 Gell ,g C�G Is E ASTc,,,N LAND SVZ✓EV 44S•OC"W ES /Nc r '�6 C,H21LTaPHF,E' "mac MEt.10 ��S 3/3/"7 4} > LOt.JC: LL ST. AEA20D >n45-- • r /