59 SUMMER STREET - ZBA (2) 59 Summer St. R-2
C. Theodore Sillars
- - � �� CQ -
fgi#g Of ttlem, la9S C1jU5dt5JUN Q 1120
E
FILE#
oxrb of 4peal
CITY CLERK,SALEM, MASS,
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF C. THEODORE SILLARS FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 59 SUMMER ST. , (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held May 27, 1987 with the following Board Members
present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petition, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming side and rear setbacks and density to allow construction of a
porch in this R-2 district.
The provision.-of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure° and conditions set forth in Section
VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of non-
conforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of
nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detri-
mental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
of the Board that the grant of the Special .Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing,, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition;
2. The proposed porch will add to the aesthetics of the house.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed porch will not be substantially more detrimental than
the existing use to the neighborhood;
2. The relief requested can be granted without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF C. THEODORE SILLARS FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 59 SUMP7ER ST. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Contruction be done as per the plans submitted;
2. A legal building permit be obtained.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
Richard A. Bencal, Secretary
A .COPY OF -THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
_ - APPEAL FRO.*,! "HIS DECISION, Ii ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 808. ANO SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
_ - OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSANT TO LASS. Gri. F.I_ UVr S. CHAPTER 808. SECTI:N 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT
GRANTED HEREI!:. SHALL N-T TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE JECISC;:?. BE'S BS THE CERT.
FICA TION OF THE CITY CLERr 1HAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED GJ) NO APPEAL HAS 9'_EG FILED,
OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. fHAT IT H?,r; BEEN DIS IISSED DR DENIED IS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND !NDEXEU UNDER THE 'NAVE OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNERS CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
E 7
1
j—_ - -- -- — �7 is
I f
,f
91
4,0
f ;
t,. r
I
��
_ _ _ - t
_ . _ _ _ - - _
z _ _. _ _... _ � .
_ 1
_ .
> _
4
. . _ _
�. »mn....�.�__....-.._�——._ r--. ..__.._.,-.
� _. w .-
r v
t' � _. ... _ __. _ _ .. . _. w ..-...� ��__ ._ ..
iy �__ � .— ._ ...__ _ �- ..._ .. r I
9i A __. _
.�
�� _ _....tea------�r�wrw��.�..
c _ __—. _. _ -A��.... ..
� �..�.__..._. ._��.�..—.. S
}
u - ., r � , � �, .t I
- ;� - �� r
t f �.—.— i � r�` rpt I
}} i�f '—
xa
— _. . — —
` _ 4 1 � F�,i �. _ j.
�, _� '_- + �� ��� th
i _ `
1
r _� _ _ � � � � -�
` �
�-�. '
__ - -- � ... Y _.�-
.. 8 A.+moo- �•T"- � yrr 7
J 1 ...�_--_••—
�_
r
--... . .._ �-- -- _ �...___ ..... ... �_�wW
P
F
j1 '�Y
L
CEerlXy r -47 riY/s P,,. L'O J ORAS TOSEPHU/E C,95,9LE
Tu TNf 4UtES .IAID RECUC./T/v.VS nOf�'HF
R\FG/Sh'45 aF O[ELH;
io:•r .i
FO,F RFG/STRy USF 4✓ty pp U
O
0.75
13.7o
LOT B
R•2,330!S.F.
3 EI/57/A.G
! � V OWELC/AG
1 h
- I _ RAYdOA/D JA[BER7
2./6
P.PP'9OVA[ 41AW TA'E SUED/V/S/O.v
6OA/7,fO[ LM/✓ VO7' REOU/REO ; /?Q - ROBERT
f
SALEM PLR,(/WWO B/O�ARD YO8US7zA Sff/
�—I4•AI/LIE -
FOR 607TER
M I�
_ EXISTING S/AIGLE FAM/q- I y
OAle,C IA/G
f
N 59 1 S5.OB'53"Ll-_-096
i
46'46'19'4/ -3.48
B10 38*36't.- 465
A/36°30'SO"/✓- 346
A/5'08.53'E - 0.46
ACK /p TR/H 89. 5/'09%d Z.96
32A1 9.69
P.K.(SCn
PR/SET) 0.75 -N5^OL"00"E
V C6
4L 70
SUryiy 8 (,"/&/c ^ vRR/RBLE triIOTH 1 STREET
LOCUS NAP PL/91U Of ZAWD
VAI
SCALE: /-•ZA:b S//LZ//
f
•�\. PROPERTY Of
�' y '� fRRt/K N-IdRCtBCE C
�'• t Abfacy B, Kt/oac 4
-
ESSEX SURYEYSERvrf,�<' ` �
•' ��' S, /8/ ESSEX S7R£FT+SIEE.N,y.1 "`'6