Loading...
STATION ROAD - ZBA 35 STATION ROAD R-1 Raymond V. Beaulieu . �M COVgRA.� z �l Titu of Salem, tt ttc �zsP# s �IIttr of �1 JPkT[ iUi r'ti i 24 All 63 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND V. BEAU°L.�'EU FOR' -'O vFF1U VARIANCES FOR 35 STATION ROAD SQLEtd. i9Q,S5, A hearing on this Petition was held on March 23, 1983, with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. Hopper, LaBrecque, Feeherry and Piemonte. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property in question to allow _ him to divide the property into two lots (Lots 1 and 2) , both of which lots will fail to comply with minimnic lot area requirements. In addition, Petitioner has requested a variance from side yard restrictions for Lot 1 to allow the garage on that site to remain there. The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public_ hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. No opposition was raised to Petitioner's plan by neighbors. 2. The proposed division of the property will create two lots which are considtent with surrounding lots. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar configuration and topography. In addition,- the configuration of the lot imposes a hardship on the petitioner by restricting his ability to use the property in a manner consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the land is located. 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause special financial hardship to the Petitioner. 4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeal voted unanimously in favor of approving the grant of the requested relief. The Board ' 1 . .1. - - grants a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions: 1. Petitioner may divide the property into two lots as shown on the plan /� t(�� submitted to the Board. r '� D DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND V. BEAULIEU FOR 24 nt: '03 VARIANCES FOR 35 STATION ROAD CITY :S'S ui-rin PAGE 2 SALEM, MASS. March 23, 1983 2. Petitioner may keep the existing garage on Lot 1 within 2.98 feet of the side line of the property. 3. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Use and Occupancy for the premises before recording the plan submitted to the Board. f AnttiQnyLM. Feeherry Secretary APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. GENERAL CHAPizli R33, MD SHALL BE FILED VTHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING - _ Cc TH:S D`-1VS'0 IN THE OrfiCE OF THE CITY CLERK. FC.:F\aT T:J iP°S. C6'Ct'At 'AR'S C,IAPTCS 333. SECTION 11. THE WMAN'CE OR :?=--C!r'.L PERINT - c.C:7•LEJ "E: _% 41.L tit,, T4 E EF:'-^F JNTIL A COPY OF THE DZ„WIN. BE. '2t.•— TH" CERT" FiCAD-'a IF iBE Ci:'i C� -ERA T!IAi ''! DAYS HAVE <V-PS°O "-'i0 A:•v" APPEAL H.;:: CEC:i FILED.OR IMT, iF-SUI.4 F.% APPEAL H.-IS CLEN FI;2, TH..4T IT HAS EUN CIS(dlSE_D CR ucS'Ed IS - RECCRCEO IN THE S1J7li ESSE:: P.E7lSLii iF Ci:E03 AND INDEXED LED-;? 'iH`"�i:A-dE CF T. CT i=R OF RECORD UR IS RECORDEO AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERNFICATE OFF TITLE. -- _ BOARD OF APPEAL - A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK - i M q I Z i h h tq Sit W �. Ilk ss � h 114. Ac,zv o£/S aqua} -Yai7 ^� o ' ti- 0 �, •` s{soo a�ua� ABP� ; v % oh gs,.ep.£'tN Aj ' 1 Q a ovnd� P rQ 41 ti k