Loading...
38 SHORE AVENUE - ZBA 38 SHORE AVENUE v - DORILLA MORENCY of Sakm, s xt xzse is Pourb of c�ypal '82 MAY -4 P2 :3P CITY Cl EM"S OFFICE S A L E M M S: DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DORILLA MORENCY REQUESTING VARIANCES FOR 38 SHORE AVE. A hearing on this Petition was held on April 28, 1982 with the following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Piemonte, Hacker, Feeherry, and Associate Member Luzinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested variances for the property identified as 38 Shore Ave. which now consists of two non-conforming lots designated as Lots A and B on a plan submitted to the Board. Variances are required because a prior division of the property caused both of the current lots to be non-conforming. The requested variances, if granted, will conform the lots to current zoning standards. The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1) The property in question currently is divided into two lots. A two-family house is on Lot A; a single-family house is on Lot B. Both houses have been at the site for over fifty years. 2) By virtue of a prior division of the property, by deed, into two lots, neither lot now conforms to current zoning. 3) Petitioner's request involves no change of use nor any other changes at the property. Petitioner seeks only to establish that each lot is a legally proper one under current zoning. On the basis of ,the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1) The property in question is unique because of its peculiar frontage problems and other access problems and because of the fact that the structures on the site were there for many years prior to any zoning statute. 2) The conditions described above especially affect the land in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. t i 'F . Z- DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DORILLA MORENCY '82 MRY -4 P 230 REQUESTING VARIANCES FOR 38 SHORE AVE. Page 2 CITY CLE . CFFICE SALEI'I i" 3) The ,conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause the following special hardship: unless the requested variances are given, it will be virtually impossible to sell either lot. 4) the desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good because the requested variances, if granted, will change nothing on the site. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeal unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions: 1) Variances from frontage, front yard, side yard, rear yard, lot area and density requirements and any other variance necessary to cause the tao lots at the site to conform to current zoning are hereby granted. Anthony' Pf. Fee 'er�y, Secr`fetary APPEAL MT!, THIS Cc",ii!'"•.`:, 1' M,':. Sh!AU 87 MADE P83S::=T U 17 OF THE i.'ASS. GE'!Ei!9L LA'S". Cu:.. _.. -- D"'-. OF FILMG OF REC10D BOAPW OF APPEAL 1 COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK. e o S c �4 0 SALEM Ns1RSOP Q rZoeds / X eESr .evice pAFK FO.PEST /P/IiE,E' Pq�PK l ocus CLAN L/NE OF CNA/,V LINK FENCE Z ` ZZO (DEED) OCD FENCE L/NEB /j4O• ' .�_ No 61 ---�, ` 000th LOT LOT B AREA=6 �Z0-S.F �i I � VlF DOR/L L A MORENCY S ' q� ti, 'SF h / W A, 3� 94f HOUSE Ae m v � NOTE.- T/�'/S PLAN Gl/,4S COMP/LED 1�eOM PZ,4N5 ANO DcEOs PECORDED AT ESSEX,SOUT// /FEC/STRYOF,DEED,S AND ACTUAL F/ELD SURVEY \ /So ZOO.00 SBO I — -O(,FP 'V COR. CONC. .PET WAZI SHORE AVE. APPROVAL UNDER SUBDIVISION CONTROL ' LAW NOT REOUIRED a4• • PLAN OF LAND SALEM PLANNING BOARD Date OWNED B Y DORIL L A MORENCY /N SALEM MASS. SCALE.- /"= 20' OCT. 24, /979 KENNETH ✓. BOUFFARD ASSOC. �S/lEPEBY CE,PT/FY THAT Tf//S PLAN CONFORMS TO THE PULES 94 LYNN Sr PEABODY, MASS. ANO PEGULAT/OHS OF THE REGIJT.QY OFOEEDS- ��uo CJ �-�,uo�/i• O 20 ¢0 60 FEET • — - it _