Loading...
22-24 SCHOOL STREET - ZBA IL 22-24 SCHOOL STREET h II 4Esselte 74520 40°/, P4 MMMA s Q 1 \l 6m �\ 1 t J CRY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745.9595 Ent.381 Will hold a public hearing for all, persons interested in the petition subs milled by MICHAEL & NANCYI LEBLANCE requesting a Variance from the number of stories to con- struct a 3rd floor dormer for the prop- erty located at 22.24 SCHOOL STREET R-2.Said hearing will be held WEDNESDAY,SEPTEMBER 21,2005 AT 6:30 P.M., 120 WASHINGTON i STREET,3RD FLOOR,ROOM 313. Nina Cohen Chairman k (917,14) CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTillI CLEOF SALEMRK'S MA Is BOARD OF APPEAL OFFICE 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY M.AUOSR FAX OVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 7 8-45-9595 1005 SEP 30 A 18 846 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF MICHAEL &NANCY LEBLANCE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22-24 SCHOOL STREET R-2 A hearing of this petition was held on September 21, 2005 with the following Board Members present:Nina Cohen, Chairman,Bonnie Belair, Richard Dionne,Nicholas Helides and Robin Stein. Notice of this hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from the number of stories to construct a Yd floor dormer for the property located at 22-24 School Street located in an R-2 zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building,or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioners Michael &Nancy LeBlance of 7 Moulton Ave. requested a variance to allow a third floor dormer for the building at 22-24 School Street. 2. As grounds for this request, Ms. LeBlance stated that the requested dormer had been partly built, pursuant to a building permit dated October 16, 2004. Although a building permit was issued by the City, it was apparently issued without the required zoning relief. As further grounds she stated that the third floor living area would not become a separate living unit, but she requested permission to install a bathroom on the third floor. 3. A Stop Work order issued by the Building Commissioner on June 16, 2005 stated that the building permit had expired, and zoning relief was needed for the third floor dormer. 4. Several neighbors spoke in opposition to the proposed petition. James Fleming of 47 Buffum Street stated that petitioner's property,a two-family house, is in Cl i Y Or 'ALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF MICHAEL &NANCY LEBLANCE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22-24 SCHOOL STREET R-2 1005 SEP 30 A page two disrepair and is badly maintained. He observed a toilet seat was left on the front porch off the house for several weeks,among other problems. 5. Jean Krajeski of 21 School Street also opposed the petition, stating that it appeared an illegal third apartment was being installed in the building. She also observed that the residence lacked sufficient off-street parking for the residents' cars. Because of insufficient off-street parking,residents and visitors park on both sides of School Street,even though it is not allowed,and this in turn creates a hazard because the curve of the street at this point impedes visibility. 6. Cheryl Liakos of 1 School Street, also opposed the petition, for the above reasons and because she felt resident children were endangered by the congested traffic on School Street. Mrs. Thomas Hayes of 44 Barr Street,also opposed the petition for the above reasons and because she objected to the increase in density caused by the illegal third unit in the building. On the basis of the above findings of fact,and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows. 1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in unnecessary hardship to the petitioner. 3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially hardship derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 2 in favor and 3 in opposition to grant the requested variances. Having failed to gamer the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion is defeated and the petition is denied. Variance Denied September 21,2005 Nina Cohen, Chairmar�n� Board of Appeal II�C, I ALCM. MA A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLA"b'S OFFICE BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Sectionjig� G Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of s si 9 18 in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11,the Variance of Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the Certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have passed and no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been filed,that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal