24 SAUNDERS STREET - ZBA (2) J
a a
P
� P.... �' ''f " '=y'y! a.4,. -vc.. - .mow. «..-. « +...� .—�.,�.. ..,.._ — ..-•• ..�s�!.��r^�,'"B�.Ii"-"a'a'e°':N,
`�Wy+Aq
oeorra� CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
.�.. Q SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01 970
TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
V, FAX: 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL 2010 OCT -b P 3: I b
MAYOR
FILE ,"
n
Confirmatory Decision to Extend
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of RIVERSIDE REALTY TRUST requesting Variances
from minimum lot width, minimum lot area, rear yard setback and lot area per
dwelling unit to allow the construction of two single-family homes
on 24 Saunders Street, R-2 Zoning District
June 3,2010
Riverside Realty Trust
c/o Scott M. Grover, Esq.
Tinti, Quinn, Grover&Frey, P.C.
27 Congress Street, Suite 414
Salem,MA 01970
Re: 24 Saunders Street
Extension of Variances
On Wednesday,May 20, 2009,the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem voted in
favor to approve the application of Riverside Realty Trust for Variances from minimum lot
width, minimum lot area, rear yard setback and lot area per dwelling unit to allow
the construction of two single-family homes in the Residential Two-Family Zoning
District. A Decision dated June 8, 2009 was filed with the City of Salem Clerk's Office on
Jane 8, 2009.
The Decision is for one year from the date of the Decision unless extended by the
Board.
On May 19, 2010 the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to extend the
Variances granted for six (6) months to November 8, 2010.
The Board understands Riverside Realty Trust intends to go forward with the project,
though additional time is needed to begin construction because extensive environmental
cleanup was required on the property.
A COPY OF THIS DECISION TO EXTEND HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or
Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds.
This decision zeas amnded to cmw typographical erns in the dates and re-ftled with the City Clerk.
2
ONDITq� CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
m 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS O 1970
TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
W� FAX: 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL 2669 !UN -8 P ': 38
MAYOR
F'ILF #i
CITY CLERK, 5ALE14, hl.-Ar�S.
June 8, 2009
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of RIVERSIDE REALTY TRUST, seeking Variances from minimum lot
width, minimum lot area, rear yard setback and lot area per dwelling unit to
accommodate two duplex (two-family) homes at 24 SAUNDERS STREET, Salem,
MA (112 zoning district).
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on April 15, 2009 pursuant to Mass
General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The meeting was closed on May 20, 2009 with the
following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Robin Stein (Chair), Rebecca
Curran, Beth Debski, Richard Dionne, and Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate).
Petitioner seeks Variances pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, §64,
Table I: Residential Density Regulations.
Statements of fact:
1. In an application dated March 25, 2009, petitioner requested relief from
dimensional requirements of the R-2 zone in order to construct two duplex homes
on the property at 24 Saunders Street.
2. The petitioner submitted a statement with the application explaining the hardship
associated with development of the property. According to the petitioner's
statement, the property is the remainder of a larger parcel subject to a taking by
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to accommodate construction of the bypass
road. The remaining parcel, which is owned by the petitioner, does not meet
dimensional requirements of a building lot under the Salem Zoning Ordinance.
The petitioner's statement also describes the lead contamination found on the
property and the expense associated with the necessary cleanup.
3. Attorney Scott Grover represented the petitioner and owner of the property,
Riverside Realty Trust. A public hearing on the Petition was opened on April 15,
2009, pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The hearing was continued
to May 20, 2009, when it was closed, with the following Zoning Board of
Appeals members present: Robin Stein (Chair), Rebecca Curran, Beth Debski,
Richard Dionne, and Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate).
2
4. On April 15, 2009, numerous members of the public expressed opposition to the
petition, citing parking problems in the neighborhood, concerns about the new
structures blocking other residents' views of the water, insufficient space for snow
removal, an already-saturated housing market in the area, and a preference for the
property to be converted to green space. The Board of Appeals also received
letters from resident Debra Kirchheimer of 14 Lemon Street and Ward 2
Councillor Michael Sosnowski, 17 Collins Street, opposing the project.
5. Also at the April 15, 2009 meeting, two abutters spoke in support of the project.
6. The petitioner submitted revised plans following the hearing on April 15, 2009,
and after meeting with abutters. The new plans showed one single-family home
on each proposed lot instead of the originally proposed two duplex homes.
Additionally, the house sizes and styles were altered. The new plan would require
less relief: the project now only requires relief from lot width on one lot, and lot
area and rear yard setback on the other. The applicant stated that these changes
were made in order to address neighborhood concerns about density and water
views.
7. At the May 20, 2009 meeting, several residents continued to voice concerns about
the project; others expressed that while their preference would be for nothing to
be built or for a park to be installed, that this proposal was an improvement over
the original. Correspondence and documents submitted to the Board by
Councillor Sosnowski indicated that a neighborhood planning study conducted in
1996 had recommended that the property be converted to a park.
8. At its meeting on May 20, 2009, the Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor and
none (0) opposed to grant the Variances required to allow for the construction of
one single-family home on each proposed lot, as shown on the revised plans
submitted on May 14, 2009.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following findings:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist affecting the parcel or building, which
do not generally affect other land or buildings in the same district;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance would involve substantial
hardship, financial or otherwise, to the appellant, considering the contamination
present;
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of
the zoning ordinance, and after the petitioner responded to neighbors' concerns,
the Board found that the project would be "minimally invasive";
3
4. The applicant may vary the terms of the Residential Two-Family District to
construct the proposed development, which is consistent with the intent and
purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance;
5. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
1. To allow for the construction of two single-family homes as proposed, the
requested Variances from dimensional requirements are granted.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor
(Curran, Stein, Tsitsinos, Debski and Dionne) and none (0) opposed, to grant petitioner's
requests for a Variance and Special Permit subject to the following terms, conditions,
and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2: All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office
and shall display said numbers so as to be visible from the street.
7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board.
8. The houses are to be constructed consistent with the drawings and plans
submitted to the Board, with the house on lot C1 consistent with the bungalow
style and the house on Lot C2 consistent with the cottage style.
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
4
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
Members
Board of Appeals
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Variance for 2 duplex's on Saunders Street, Salem, MA
Dear Board Members,
We support the petition to build two duplex homes on Saunders Street. The
area's proposed for these homes are at the end of the street, abutt us directly, and are now
just fields of weeds that collect trash and are sometimes used as a hangout.
We would like to have new neighbors which we feel will complete the area and
make it safer for our families.
/• I��
11
ILI 1�),eC�,(' I tSI i `A
Debra H. Kirchheimer
14 Lemon Street, Salem, MA 01970 978-979-88401978-744-7274
Email: dkmd@verizon.net
April 14, 2009
City of Salem
120 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Petition Submitted by Riverside Realty Trust
Dear Board of Appeal
Please accept this letter as my formal protest against the variance request submitted by
Riverside Realty Trust.
My understanding is that the land under discussion was deemed "undevelopable" when
the State took what they needed for the new bypass road, and for that, Riverside Realty
Trust was well compensated. That issue aside, the request for the variance is not a
minor request and will have a great impact on our neighborhood.
This area is already over-crowded and by putting 4 more homes on such small lots is not
good for our neighborhood. In addition, there are many homes in the immediate area for
sale that have been on the market for some time. We also have homes that have gone
to auction due to foreclosure. By adding 4 new homes to the already saturated market is
a big concern.
This developer was also responsible for putting two single family homes at the end of
Pearl Street, attaching them with a deck, and calling it a "two family' home, fully
exploiting a loophole .in the zoning ordinance. I recall, as a peace offering, this
developer offered the land under discussion to the city for "green space" when the local
residents protested the construction on Pearl Street. Now this developer is asking for a
variance on the land to do the same thing.
This neighborhood has already sacrificed a lot of land for the bypass road. I feel it is
important to protect whatever, "green space' we have left. Please do not approve the
variance request.
Thank you for you consideration.
Debra Kirchheimer
Page 1 of 1
Danielle McKnight
From: Thomas Stpierre
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:17 AM
To: Danielle McKnight
Subject: FW:
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Board of Appeals,
Earlier George Fallon asked to meet with me. During that meeting he gave me a copy of what he proposed to do
with the two parcels on either side of Saunders Street? I asked if I could get a copy to distribute to the
neighborhood. He agreed and asked that if any one had any questions to please contract him.
I have attached a map indicating the direct surrounding properties that I visited to give copies of the planned
development. They are numbered one thru twenty.
More than half of the residents were home and I presented the information directly to them. I did not find one
person who was in favor of the proposal. In fact they were almost angry. They apparently still remember the
issues raised a couple of years ago when the first buildings were built on property that they were promised would
be park land or off street parking for some. The anger of being lied to back then has not worn off. Some blame
George Fallon, some blame Joe Walsh, the former city planner and almost all blame the Mass Highway
Department.
It seems that some have a different memory of the exact promises but overall are adamantly opposed to anything
being built. They interpret this as a continuation of the lies. They were promised that the end result of the by-pass
being built would be a wonderful panoramic river view and their quality of life would be greatly enhanced.
They feel the development itself will have many negative impacts but the main concern is that long held views of
the river would be gone. They would feel boxed in. They also thought the fresh summer breezes would be a thing
of the past as the new house would block the air flow. Without these qualities of life the value of their homes
would diminish significantly.
I can go on and elaborate but the neighbors themselves intend on being there to be heard. I totally support the
positions of the neighbors and would respectfully ask that the proposal be denied.
Thank you for your consideration
Michael Sosnowski
Ward Two CityCouncillor
4/14/2009
JJ■ 1 FIs.FIJI'\PII:J.IIIIIIIII.SlIIfiIIIMIC/
/1Ll
Public Hearing
Tuesday, January 21, 1997
Council Chambers 2nd Floor
Salem City Hall
93 Washington Street
Salem, Massachusetts
7:00 PM
Preliminary Design Public Hearing
for
Bridge Street By-Pass
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Highway Department
10 Park Plaza
Boston, MA 02116
Nevin J. Sullivan
Commissioner
Thomas F. Broderick, P.E.
Chief Engineer
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE OF A PRELIMINARY DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING
A Preliminary Design Public Hearing will be held by the Massachusetts Highway Department to
discuss the proposed Bridge Street By-Pass in the City of Salem.
WHERE: Salem City Hall
Council Chambers 2nd Floor
93 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
WHEN: Tuesday,January 21, 1997 at 7.00 PM
PURPOSE: The purpose of this hearing is to provide the public with an opportunity to become
acquainted with proposed Bridge Street By-Pass. All views and comments made at the
hearing will be fully reviewed and considered by the Massachusetts Highway
Department.
PROPOSAL: The Bridge Street By-Pass involves the construction of 4,600 feet of roadway connecting
the new Salem-Beverly Bridge with Washington Street in downtown Salem. The By-
Pass will follow a corridor between the MBTA commuter rail tracks and the Bridge
Street Neighborhood.
The roadway will be 40 feet in width and include a twelve foot wide travel lane and an
eight foot wide shoulder in each direction. A walkway system is planned that would
link side streets together to form a landscaped linear walkway extending from March
Street to the Parker Bros.Site.
Two noise barrier walls will be included in the project and will be designed to reduce
noise levels for residents on the March Street peninsula and residents Between March
and Thorndike Street.
ivlost of the required right-of-way has already been acquired by the Massachusetts
Highway Department but some additional land taking and construction easements will
be necessary.
The state is responsible for acquiring all needed rights in private and public lands. The
Department's policy concerning land acquisitions will be discussed at this hearing.
Written views received by the Department subsequent to the date of this notice and up in five days prior
to the date of the hearing will be displayed for the public inspection and copying at the time and date
listed above.
Written statements and other exhibits in place of, or in addition to oral statement at the public hearing
regarding the proposed undertaking are to be submitted to Thomas F. Broderick, P.F., Chief Engineer,
' Massachusetts Highway Department, 10 Park Plaza, Boston, NIA 02116. Such submission will also be
acceptable at the hearing. The final date tar receipt of these statements and exhibits will be ten days
after the hearing. Plans will be on display one hour before the hearing, with an engineer in attendance
to answer questions regarding this project.
Kevin J. Sullivan Thomas F. Broderick, P F.
Commissioner Chief Engineer
1 '+.4AlI g111)Kr 11*114n :I1XC
MAss HicHwar
W lliam f. Weld Paul nlCellucciGovem James J Kerasiotes Kevin J. Ione)
Govemar (ieuterunf Gov�mor Sa'nrary Cammraiwrer
Office Of the Commissioner
The Massachusetts Highway Department is committed to
building and maintaining a highway infrastructure that is both a
safe and efficient way for our motor vehicular public commute .
As part of our efforts to improve our infrastructure and
minimize congestion, we are holding this public hearing to
explain the proposed improvements, listen to your comments and
answer any questions you may have. At the conclusion of the
hearing we will review all of your comments and where feasible
incorporate them into the design of the project.
Unfortunately, new construction often results in creating
traffic inconveniences for our motoring public . The Department
places a great deal of emphasis on minimizing the temporary
disruptive effects of construction.
The Massachusetts Highway Department encourages input from
local communities and values your thoughts . Please be assured
that we will undertake no project without addressing the concerns
of the community.
cerely,
r
1 van
OMMIS 0 R
Massachusetts Highway Department • Ten Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116.3973 • (617) 973-7500
3
BRIDGE STREET BY-PASS - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJEQ IOCATION AND PURPOSE
The proposed project involves the construction of a new roadway connecting Washington Street and
downtown Salem with the new Salem-Beverly Bridge. The new roadway will follow a corridor between
the MBTA commuter rail tracks and the Bridge Street neighborhood. The new roadway is an important
part of the larger Salem-Beverly Transportation Project which is intended to provide increased access
and mobility for area residents.
SCOPE OF IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed improvements include 4,600 feet of new roadway. The roadway will be 40 feet in width
and include a twelve foot travel lane and an 8 foot wide shoulder in each direction. The elevation of
the new road will generally be 1 or 2 feet above the grade of the existing MBTA rail tracks except for the
section of roadway near Washington Street, where the roadway will rise some 15 feet to meet the
existing grade of Washington Street. The existing rotary at Washington Street will be replaced by a
signalized intersection. The redesign of the rotary as a signalized intersection is not a part of this
project, but is part of the Bridge Street Reconstruction Project (Washington Street to Flint Street) The
By-Pass project will include an interim signalized intersection so that the Bridge Street By-Pass can be
opened for traffic immediately after construction. The By-Pass Project is independent of the Bridge
Street Reconstruction Project, and therefore can be opened to traffic before the Bridge Street Project is
completed.
DESIGN FEATURES _
To enhance the visual character of the roadway corridor and to improve mobility for pedestrians, a 30
to 40 Foot wide landscaped linear ark would be developed next to the new roadway. The linear ar
would " e a 10 foot wide walkway with the remaining wi t a an scope to prove a of a visual
buffer for ad acent property an to en aparkway-like a can
nce to t ae roa wa .
would extend from the P ae uaear par
A Commuter Rail Station to March Street. The walkwa within the park
wou m up wi e y o a em s proposed walkway near Saunders Street, and a otential new
Opel space area a ween ear trees an sunders Street. 11w linear parK would so link together the
t_arlton School and Curtis Park at March Street
The new roadway would have street lighting. The light pole spacing and level of lighting would be
similar to the lighting on existing Bridge Street. The luminaires would be the cut-Off variety so that light
is directed down onto the roadway with minimal spill over to adjacent properties.
As a result of commitments made during the environmental permitting process for the project, noise
barriers will be provided at two locations. A barrier of approximately 13 feet in height will be provided
along March Street Court and a barrier approximately 15 feet in height will be provided to reduce noise
for residents of Rice Street and Thorndike Street. Landscaping will be employed to minimize the visual
impact of these barriers.
Roadway drainage will incorporate storm water Best Management Practices(BMPs), such as vegetated
swales and a sedimentation pond to eliminate direct discharge of untreated roadway runoff to the
North,River. The vegetated sedimentation pond would have a water depth of 1-2 feet, and could be
incorporateclas a visual feature in the potential neighborhood green space between Saunders Street and
Pearl Street.
I' .b.Wl HI IYIMI,I'MI I)I'A:N I INC
I; I
PROJECT LIMITS
E� BYP
P
GE S�R�
t:
PRO CT LIMITS
SALEM - BRIDGE STREET BY- PASS
LOCUS MAP
WHAT IS A PUBLIC HEARING?
WHYA PUBLIC HEARING?
To provide an assured method whereby the Commonwealth can furnish to the public, information
concerning the Commonwealth's transportation construction proposals, and to afford every interested
resident of the area an opportunity to be heard on any proposed Federal-Aid project. At the same time,
the hearing affords the Commonwealth an additional opportunity to receive information from local
sources which would be of value to the Commonwealth in making its final decision as to what design
features should be selected for further development.
WHY NOTA VOTE ON HIGHWAY PLANS?
The hearing is not intended to be a popular referendum for determining the location or design features
of a proposed improvement by majority vote of those present. The hearing does not relieve the duly
constituted officials of the Highway Department of the necessity for making decisions in Highway
Department matters for which they are charged with full responsibility.
WHAT DOES PUBLIC HEARING ACCOMPLISH?
It is designed to ensure the opportunity for,or the availability of,a forum to provide factual information
which is pertinent to the determination of the final location or design considered by the Commonwealth
to best serve the public interest, and on which improvement projects are proposed to be undertaken.
It is important that the people of the area express their views in'regard to the proposal being presented,
so that views can be properly recorded in the minutes of the meeting. These minutes will be carefully
studied by the Massachusetts Highway Department and will be taken into consideration in the
development of the project as it progresses to final design.
TO SAFEGUARD THE PROPERTY OWNER
If your property, or a portion of it, must be taken by the Commonwealth for transportation purposes,
in the interest of all the people of the Commonwealth, your rights are fully protected under the law.
Briefly, here area some of the answers to questions you might ask:
I. Who contacts me?
A representative from the Massachusetts Highway Department will contact vau regarding
property acquisition. They will explain the procedure to be followed when acquiring and
paying for the property. An appraiser may ask questions needed to arrive at a fair price for
your property.
1. What is a "fair price"for my property?
FVery effort is made to insure that an equitable market value is awarded to you for the property,
or to appraise the "damage" to the property as a result of the taking.
3. Must I accept the State's offer?
No. If after the figure established as fair market Value has been offered to the owner and the
owner feels fie or she is not tieing offered a fair price, he or she has the right, within ttwo years,
to appeal to the courts. Pending a court decision, he or she can be paid a "protanto" (or "fo" r the
time being")amount that in not way prejudices the court appeal.
r ....ni wi rr n:r.rxrnr x:�ner:
COMMENT SHEET
PRELIMINARY DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING
BRIDGE STREET BY-PASS
SALEM
January 21, 1997
This sheet is provided for your comments.
Your input is solicited and appreciated.
Please return your sheet, with comments, to a staff member at this meeting or mail to:
Thomas F. Broderick, P.E.
Chief Engineer
Massachusetts Highway Department
Ten Park Plaza
Boston, Massachusetts 02116-3973
The final date of receipt of written statement and exhibits will be ten (10) days after the Public Hearing.
Name: Title:
Address: Organization:
MASS p jGHWA Y Mitt Romney Keay Healey Daniel A.Grabayskas John Cogl aro
f7/ Governor LG.Govenror Secretay Carunissroner
Office of the Commissioner
December 4, 2003
Mr. George Fallon
Tache Real Estate
208 Derby Street
Salem,MA 01970
Dear Mr. Fallon:
I am responding to your recent letters regarding your property at 24 Saunders Street,
Salem,MA.
Please be advised that the Massachusetts Highway Department(MassHighway) has
authority to acquire only such laud as is needed for project purposes. The anticipated
right of way needs from your property,of which you appear to be aware from discussions
with Steve McLaughlin and Vin Luca, are identified on the attached plan. As indicated,
the Bridge Street By-Pass Project does not necessitate an acquisition of the entire
property. Accordingly, the proposed acquisition, currently in process, involves only the
necessary portion. For your information, also shown on the attached plan is the
remainder area, not currently necessary for project purposes, and therefore not anticipated
to be acquired.
As part of the valuation process, however, the damage award will include not only
damages for the pall acquired, but will also include severance, if any, to the remainder of
the property not acquired. The appraiser assigned to this matter will be in contact with
you to discuss the proposed acquisition and obtain all information that you consider
relevant to the determination of damages.
We look forward to future discussions with you concerning MassHighway's construction
of the proposed Bridge Street Bypass Road project, including the construction of the
associatcd bike path. I expect that we will be able to conclude this matter in a manner
that satisfactorily addresses your concerns.
S ncerc,
r
John CoLliatl
CiU11111 iss it on
CC: Sen. Frederick F. Bciry
Massachusetts Highway Department • Ten Park Fiaza, Boston, MA 02!16-3973 •(617) 973-7800
O
I LL
ZONING DISTRICT: R2
�ti o
ASSESSORS MAP 36 PARCEL 87
o
�OLL�� RECORD OWNER: RIVERSIDE REALTY TRUST
N DEED REFERENCE: BOOK 20983 PAGE 107
RpBERr CHIL
J a�✓ ���Q�s
TO / PLAN REFERENCES: PLAN BOOK 368 PLAN 34
D
9.9
sr ti,.-v PLAN BOOK 378 PLAN 22
�� 4r3.3'7' /
I`
• wMR4
i rlorktiRver ` 1 sw i \ \ ZONING TABULATION
LOCUS MAP N (� l LOT C2 :o° RESIDENTIAL R2
LA m 43^ SF
PAUL A IQ v� M m 1.b 10 , I ITEM MIN./MAX. LOT C1 LOT C2
pELpRES -nnls I jflt+ N
�� \Zo LOT WIDTH 100 FT. 90f FT. # 142.8 ± FT.
`p• 0 Z LOT AREA 15,000 SF. 15,400± SF. 10,143± SF. #
v o o/ \ Zo �T FRONT YARD 15 FT. 92± FT. 16 FT.
°• SIDE YARD 10 FT. 30 FT. 12± FT.
LESLIE A 13YRNE -� / �� REAR YARD 30 FT. 30 FT. 18± FT. #
s N / 1 o LOT COVERAGE 35 % 9± % 12± %
`-1� a+ 03 y BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FT. 25± FT. 25± FT.
zo sy�4$,�6� m 0 / BUILDING STORIES 21/2 2 2
N �Oj60,i4` GARAGE DRIVE W
PROPOSED I
Z°.y PACED # DENOTES VARIANCE REQUESTED
_ I DRIVE 20 /
Ity \ \ v y 3' WO FENCS22-58'14w�x.�� C��D77 \ D1 Ib 9
IVt IS.g r CD �. lk
417 \�• ��
LOT C1 4.V _ - 16 I =: 24 `�° �A
ro „t 15,400± SF. �I DWELLING °°• °%
s.l OSED
1t.e PAVED DRIVE ti� y`,,`O O�sy�- 1 �I, r,8 , PROP
pU� 16 O PROP ED ,4O Q p 1 1S1
FLR 12.0
HANNA NAKH 14 0 14 � V WALKIs—CELLAR—
p / Q. Ira 24 �%
r SONIA KARAM a - D o s.9
u' lap jDER
L 1 m
PROPOSED
d RIVERS EDGE CONDDMINIUM g `� - — — —13.9 3.7
6 ARgpRVITAE SHRU9S 'E [)%ELLING 100.00' LAWN 1
Lr
sy ISTFLR 1. 1 1 S
CELLAR
27.
S _ '-'moo-
6
L I S
FRANK 8 PHYLZ I ;z.b
BROWN N T
E ASEM E
150.51' �—
"� \ 4�
— — C LINK N240,3 -
9�6
f
tM CACI S STORMWATER
%o\ \ MANAGEMENT
FACILITY
I � '
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
2004 STATE HIGHWAY LAYOUT
L.O. No. 7464, PB 378 PL 22
SMH
BRIDGE STREET BYPASS
PLAN TO ACCOMPANY PETITION
TO THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATED IN
SALEM , MASS .
PREPARED BY
RAILROAD TRACKS
L E G E N D EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC.
lilt
o SMH EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
CHRISTOPHER R. MELL 0, PLS
0 DMH EXISTING DRAIN MANHOLE
® EXISTING CATCH BASIN r CHRSRCiN^S
oya EXISTING HYDRANT 104 LOWELL ST. PEABODY, MA. 01960
MEL
EXISTING WATER GATE
o.31
CONTOUR � � Y
— 100 EXISTING (978) 531 -8121
100.00 EXISTING SPOT GRADE
)9 9
UTILITY POLE / �f / `W�4jyr�;,sa'
RETAINING WALL a� su'.y SCALE: 1 = 20 APRIL 28, 2009
000000000 STONE WALL North Rlver PREPARED FOR
CURB
— x—x— FENCE
RIVERSIDE REALTY TRUST
PHOTO REPRODUCTION OF THE ABOVE SEAL IS
INDICATIVE OF UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION
OF THIS PLAN AND IS TO BE CONSIDERED A uazs� - — saes
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND/OR FRAUD.
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY SHALL NOT ACCEPT 0 10 20 40 60 80 F 1 0321
PHOTO REPRODUCTION FOR ANY PURPOSE.
I
I
HIGHWAY GUARD RAIL DRAINAGE DETAILS WATER SUPPLY ALTERATIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONDUIT SALEM
BRIDGE STREET
NONE SEE BELOW NONE NONE
STATE FED AID PR( NO SHEET TOTAL
NO SHEETS
MASS 16 1 147
/ PROJECT FILE NO 6D1 D17
SHARED USE PATH PLAN
� I
SHARED USE PATH CONSTRUCTION BASELINE DATA
k�L200'
RIVERFRONT I
DESCRIPTION TANGENT/CURVE DATA NORTHING EASTING LIMIT /
f BEGIN STA 10+00.000 L = 24.845 m N 66'1 W 919960.1264 250041.9045
PC STA 10+24.845 R 175.000 m A = 21049'29" 919970.0395 250019.1233
_ O� SrR
L 66.660 m T 33.739 m
PT STA 10+91.504 919984.4972 249954.4623 o I
#114 1/2 L = 16.846 m N 88'18'31" W
N/F PC STA 11+08.350 919984.9944 249937.6238 \ �1 4
IAN R & THERESA M R = 25.000 m A = 51'41'57"
r
uTAUEN PT STA 11+30.908 L = 22.558 m T = 12.112 m 919995.0746 249918.2937 j
3K. 17245 PG. 387 I
� 3.49 BW � I
END STA 11+40.000 L = 9.092 m S 36'36'34" E 920002.3726 249912.8718 V #24 \ \ 3.95 TW I I
STA 10+00.000 SHARED USE PATH CONST - LEMON STREET D
STA 36+75.781 BRIDGE ST CONST q, PATRICIAN AF O'KEEFE z :4I4.46 BTW
59.831 m LT PROP 3.0 m BK. 17324 PG. 4993.83 / I
N 919960.1264 /� ew
LE 250041.9045 - - - - - J � HMA SHARED
\ #1 USE PATH PROP LEACHING Egk�IN
LEMON STREET COURT STA 11+13 I/ / I
SEAN P. &/SIOBHAN M. Z #3 2.500 m LT /
O LEMO STREET COURT RIM EL = 3.810
MAHONEY \ Top 100 mm CLF I
F- PROP 150 mm SINGLE YELLOW N F 4.53 BW
\ BK. 23067 PG. 38 / \ 5.45 TW 50 mm OAK I
Lw CENTER LINE (REFL / THERMO) v III M.MF & KA HLEE PR
OF SL��€ ew
[� p, I #2 ` ` B . 21484 PG. 303 5.92 TW VC 50 mm OAK I
PROP 1.22 m �t Rt 1 �, LEMON STREET COURT
(n #20 CROSS STREET CHAIN LINK FENCE N/F PROP 100 mm 1.8 m WO 1 50 mm OA BRIDGE STREET Tt- SS I
W COLLEEN A/FDONOVAN Cytc`b� MARCELLA A. JURALEWICZ LOA�2ANq SEED \8 LATTIC IX SHARED USE PATH
P DOUBLE-SIDED N BK. 13588 PG. 18 BK. 24198 PG. 142 6.91 TW 6.4 T 12 \ 50 mm OAK I
PRO N/F 1.2 m C y I
WARNING SIGN PROP 1.22 m `NF1 k PROP BOT OWNERS M=•8 m STOCKADE l CS / �� h I
EXISTING
U W11-1 2 CHAIN LINK FENC a�) OF SLOPE UNKNOWN & WOO Lt TTICE _FENCE 5.55 B 1 BUILDING
- HT 81 T
W16 7 L R IR WROUGHT F z
N
250 mm MARL 6.21 TW IRON�FENCE E CE � CL � I z
#19 EXIST SHARED a 450 m CHESTNUT 5.52 BW 5. 1 BW p8• w I
7.0 BC B.99 BC 300 mm MAPLE-7� GRANITE BLOCK 450 m TREE
/ 7.1 TC 7,12 TC 1.8 m -r PROP 300 mmRETAINING WALL 300 MAPL REM TTP I N
N F USE PATH 6.24 TW 6. t Tw 7 MEET EXISTING W
MICHAEL STOP LIN 30o mm c BRICK SHARED USE PATH Q
WYNN 2 0 mm E 7.06 BC -300 mm MAPLE PILLARS _ _ O w I
3-30 mm REE 6.31 rN CL T S 36'36'34" E v
SK. 7.20 TC -2-300 mm MAPL 5 CL - OO mm BI _ �� III
-� 6 F \ I I 6.45 TW 3-32 BW 3.35 BW L=9.092 m I a
-�- J p , r. o� VG Rl 4.37 TW OP TOP Y. I
PR I I
-- RUBBL 5 � SEt1EN OF SLOPE 1 1 B aENCHMARK:
-TO BRIDGE 00 _ - -- - WER 6P
' .W CORNER CONCRETE I
y 4.32 BW 3.85 BW mm TR T mm E LE LIGHT POLE BASE I
��L=24.84 2 W =Talvl r� W �4. 6 H "OSE 'A CON h 150 mm ASH V Q_1�5 fbb rM PROPREM N/F C0 m 0 I
�- 7.18 TC 500 mm 2 TW' '�' 5.99 TW lu0 mm S 30S CITY OF SALEM 1 LOAM AND SEED ST \LkNE I
6.55 TW BK. 12107 cL=4,12
M 7.08 BC _ - ----- C$ PG. 443 CAP-5.02 I
I
N/F KtMAIN 7.25 7101 BC 6.54 TW 5.48 B- 5 SESD 15 EM ET �2 6 AS H48 REM AA LIMIT OF 50 mm OA I
MBTA 7.15 TC m STOCKADE IX VC
BK. 6311 3.0 m C C C. PAD ENCE D - SHED 11 1D GRASS I
PG. 396 150 m CHERRY - - - LOAM I
7.05 BC 2- 00 mm MAPLE 3.2g BW STONES PILE I I
PROP SHARED 7.16 TC 0 mm CATALPA 350 mm MAPLE �2 mm TREE '
USE PATH RAMP W11-1 2 350 mm MAPLE 2-300 m MARL 1.8 m STOCKADE / 400 mm PINEI I I
SEE DETAIL BELO W16-7 L R #5 150 mm MAPLE 6.90 TW \ FE CE L 1.8 m STOCKADE a, Lr 50 m OAK
SAUNDERS STREET POST WITH 1.2 m LF 150 mm CHERR FENCE I I I
N/F WEATHER #13
SLAWSON, KELLIHER, INSTRUMENTS SAWN UP SAUNDERS STREET I
PROP 1.22 m I 250 mm PINE I
CHAIN LINK FENCE MINICH & ARROYO-CODY #11 SAUNDERS STREET N/F
BK. 21851 PG. 379 N/F ROBERT CHILTON
BK. 21882 PG. 29 DANIEL J. & KELLY L. BK. 17609 PG. 74
mm 0 K
Ak 24553 PG. 270 DUGERY - SIGNING NOTES:
F- BK. 26843 PG. 362
1. MAINTAIN 0.9 m (MINIMUM) LATERAL SIGN CLEARANCE TO EDGE OF
mm OAKPLANTED/ y SHARED USE PATH.
IL PROP 152 mm CEM CONCONICAREA s IT T FOR PATH SIGNS SHALL BE 1.5 m FROM BOTTOM EDGE
•FILLED STEEL POSTS IN SAUNDERS STREET 50 m CA 2• MOUNTING HEGH
CEM CONIC FOUNDATIONS OF SIGN TO NEAR EDGE OF PATH SURFACE.
Lo 6i ( ) PROP HMA SHARED BRICKI
rn PROP 100 mm USE PATH
N LOAM AND SEED t MOUNT SIGN R5-3 vcC \ \\
to (TYP) I " ' I ON FENCE
N I I N PROP 1.22 m HIGH TREES PLANT LIST
Z
CHAIN LINK FEN E
a, w.-•-.-►- -.-.--. - - y - - - (NP) ALilt,, �blk4, SYMBOL QUANT ITEM NO BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE NOTES LANDSCAPE LEGEND
a¢ SAWCUT
AA 3 783.049 AMELANCHIER ARBOREA DOWNY SERVICEBERRY 50-60mm CAL B&B
SAWCUT
1 7.5% u r 1 7.5% SHRUBS DECIDUOUS SHADE/
ro CL 23 794.731 CLETHRA ALINIFOLIA SUMMERSWEET 460-610mm CAN O FLOWERING TREES
a CS 61 790.733 CORNUS SERICEA 'FLAVIRAMEA' YELLOW TWIG DOGWOOD 460-61Omm CAN
0SAWCUT = PROP 2.0 m GRAN TRANS IX 23 785.631 ILEX GLABRA COMPACT INKBERRY 460-610mm CAN Q EVERGREEN SHRUBS
a_ PROP o SIDEWALK (TYP)AN CURB TYPE VA1 (TYP) MP 25 789.331 MYRICA PENSYLVANICA NORTHERN BAYBERRY 460-61Omm CAN
L PROP FLUSH Q DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
i CURB PROP 3.05 WIDE VC 33 789.631 VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY 460-610mm CAN
o CEM CONC WCR
rn
SHARED USE PATH RAMP AND FENCING SCALE IN METERS
AT CROSS STREET 0 5 12.5 25
FOR PROFILE: SEE SHEET NO. 27
NTS
- - - ---------
--- -
14R PEARL ST, aka LOT C1 SAUNDERS STREET
70054.000' W WGS84 70053.000' W
WATER & SEWER CROSSING NOTES: \ — s ' � F•
1. MINIMUM COVER FOR A WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 5 FEET. 1 ! • .� ' �� ,y
2. HORIZONTAL SEPARATION: THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN THE WATER UNE
AND SEWER LINE IS 10 FEET. I .� -fit + tfi0;.� 0""'•, /�
I Map 36 Lot 77 VERTICAL SEPARATION: THE MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN A WATER AND SEWER LINES AT `
AT A CROSSING SHALL BE 18". WATER LINES SHALL CROSS ABOVE A SEWER UNE. IF WATER UNE CANNOT
b N/F AT A CROSSING SHALL BE 18". WATER LINES SHALL CROSS ABOVE A SEWER LINE. IF WATER UNE MUST 1 �, r r 1 ,•err x ' �'
Robert Chilton CROSS UNDER THE SEWER LINE, THE UNE SHALL BE ENCASED WITH PRESSURE RATED CASING PIPE EXTENDING Z y /J x f IJ :x^ z �a ` z
Q' 13 Saunders St. AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CROSSING. PIPES MAY ALSO BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE IF APPROVED ` '" '
' N BY CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. O , 1 1k :t jF � ir. •. t O.,4Y t � 1U� y .IY r1 O
0 0 o
I,.1
° IV
1 1 l ,,.( nc Y'•v O
7-A Ln
o / HOUSE # 13
a
MH R=21.8 a` '� LOT C2 ( ® �-'C �' �� '� " %" do •
r
�G 1=13.2 Map 36 Lot 87 / 1 i' CH �► ,/�
1) j 10,146 sq.ft. 1, g t:.
BENCHMARK: 6 15 SAUNDERS ST.
Map Hex Nut
C
Hydrant o to " k 6t0(TJte
Ma 36 Lot 78 Y a o 2 r+ N/F EI=20.88 (N.G.V.D.)
Leslie Byrne t� w � �• "'". 1� '
I o 6, 70°54.000 W WGS84 70053.000 W
tV 16 Saunders St. a ,no p/ O 0 Map 35 Lot 25 MN 0 5 MILE
00
° Ul 6 /� O. O; N/F 15,x,V ®000 FEET 0 500 1000 METERS
y HOUSE #16 WT_/I o� Commonwealth of Massachusetts Prnrtedfrom TOPO!@2001National GeograpMcHo
" In 18 / 242 Bridge Street LEGEND ]dngs(www.topo.com}
\ S \ y 1 wAR CINE
�7g \I8\ \ \ J0�Bp .. GgRgce a 19x0 /
p4 WATER GATE
,� D GG GAS GATE
4� \ \ S22.58'14"W I / / / PROPOSED WAIF MH
MANHOLE
\ \ \ 'o -- -. _. -RET WALL WIT53FE6CE� - \ - " METER LOCATION O
APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF \ \ \ \ EXISTING �B CATCH BASIN
EXISTING FILL PILES � Vt ``
` \ \ ,6 \ \ \ M - tg 18 - � - ¢ SEWER i 19.7 \` - � Mo MONITORING WELL
Q-- R UN - - - -
PROPOSED WATER _ _ - PW�1"WA N g -SERVICE - �9 '� �� �' HYDRANT
12.9 X METER LOCATION - - - r8 J I"=16.5'1 �Y°
Map 36 Lot 57 ' 'PROPOSED PAVED DRIVEWAY\ v CB _ ® SEWER MANHOLE
w -.-SEWER SERVICE pg i s) - U �L''
CONDO 12X7 I=12. ' 1=12.5 PROPOSED SINGLE ,0 •0 QD RUN ROOF LEADERS INTO UTILITY POLE ZONING DISTRICT - R2
14 Pearl St. O Ln 28 I 17X1 \ 0\ i FAMILY^FD`twNG I INFILTRATOR VIA SEPARATE
N 1 - p5 \ i �r IRE -
116,0' -" PIPE. DO NOT COMBINE d GUY W Lot Width 100'
I \\ 1s \I Walk o / — Lot Area — 15,000 SF
N � - WITH FOUNDATION DRAIN ° TREE
O PROPOSED SINGLE I =16.5'1 - — — Top FND=20.7'1 FOUNDATION & GUTTER DRAIN ^
30' i FAMILY DWELLING ` BFE=13.27± { INFILTRATORS: 2 ROWS of 3 o STONE BOUND Front Yard — 15'
\ LOT C1 I R=17.23 I ® STAKE
RUN ROOF LEAD RS INTO I �� Side Yard - 10'
12.9 , tn ! Ma 36 Lot 5� D I I=13.4 i o r'� PROPERTY LINT
C a Top•FND=20.7'1 INFILTRATOR VIA SEPARATE p ____---- vy Rear Yard - 30
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROLAIMIT OF WORK 13.2'± PIPE. DO NOT COMBINE 1 15,399 s ft. I o CHAIN LINK FENCE
I 12X6 BFEs WITH FOUNDATION DRAIN > 18 PEARL ST. _- e< PORCH �c�. _ Lot Coverage — 35%
FOUNDATION & GUTTER DRAIN o o I �_ m CONTOUR LINE
I 1 INFILTRATORS: 2 ROWS OF 3 Ln I C� - - - _ 1. r Building Height - 35
13.0 ; } j - r, I o MW N19-03'26"E OW OVERHEAD WIRE Building Stories - 2/
14 0\ i — —
1
LIMIT OF RIVERFRONT (200')
200' RIVERFRONT AREA
! FD ° - ' PROPOSED EF JSION CONTROL
1 - — _ - \ 100.00'
C - S 200' RIVERFRONT AREA m
~PROPOSED DECK 3 0o PROPOSED GF,ADE NO1ES
PROPOSED DECK & STAIRS & STAIRS — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE
_ — — 1. TOPOGRAPHY, PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION AND SITE FEATURES WERE OBTAINED
-HI QPM OOXO PROPOSED SPOT GRADE FROM AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY BY LE13LANC SURVEY ASSOCIATES OF DANVERS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
SEMENT o4
N N OF 20' WIDE UTILITY EA
CITY OF SALEM 13 O SEWER MANHOLE HAS BEEN CLEANED AND pg PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE TAK
0 EN FROM EXISTING AVAILABLE
I o LINE HAS BEEN WATER JETTED. LINE IS CLEAR PW IN PROPOSED WATER SERVICE INFORMATION AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. THERE MAY BE EXISTING LINES
—_ N24°03'09"E 1, OF OBSTRUCTION HATH ADEQUATE FLOW. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CONTACT
IG-SAFEX 12.6 150.51' ONETHEDPER SITE.0 TY OU!R FIRM DOEISSNOTDNNIN WARRANT OR RGUUARANTEE IOR ITHE LOCATION
ANYONSTRUCTION
MW X12 0 OF ANY UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON.
— x 112.43. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL DIG-S
EXISTING STORM WATER
OF 72
MANAGEMENT AREA EXCLUSIVE OF SATURDAYS, SUNDAYSAFE AND LEGALB8-344-7HOUDAYS?PRIOR33 AMUM TOMB GINNING ANYRS,
EXCAVATION AT THE SITE.
Ma 35 Lot 25 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF, AND THE GRANTING OF ALL
P NECESSARY PERMITS BY, THE CITY OF SALEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
N/F RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THAT ALL PERMITS ARE IN PLACE PRIOR TO BEGINNING
Commonwealth of Massachusetts CONSTRUCTION.
242 Bridge Street 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND
LOCAL SAFETY CODES.
6. PLEASE REFER TO SALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION DATED JUNE 8
RIVERFRONT NOTES: 2009 FOR DIMENSIONAL RELIEF.
AREA OF LOT WITHIN THE RIVERFRONT AREA: 3702sft FIRMnFLIoo�NSURANCERATEMAAP COMM FLOOD
PANEL #250102E o1 e
AREA OF DISTURBANCE OF RIVERFRONT: 2904sff
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
I N
AT
TREE
BRIDGE ST BYPASS 0 T C1 & C2 SAUNDERS ST.
IN
SALEM, MA 01970
APPLICANT/ JEFF HOLLORAN
OWNER: 41 FAIRMOUNT STREET
SALEM, MA 01970
BASED ON THE PROPOSED GRADING SHOWN ON THIS
PLAN THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGES TO THE DIRECTION ENGINEER:
RAIL ROAD TRACKS OF STORMWATER RUNOFF TO ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM THOMAS MANNETTA INCORPORATED
RAIL ROAD TRACKS FROM PRE AND POST CONSTRUCTION.
RAIL ROAD TRACKS A OF ,qs 11A OLD RIGHT ROAD — IPSWICH, MA 01938
s
9�y PHONE: (978) 356-7056 EMAIL: TOM®THOMASMANNETTA.COM
VERNON J.
LeBLANC �}
CIVIL y DRAWING FILE: C:\TCMDRAW2010\SaundersSITE12-15
' No. 30491
REFERENCES: DATE: 8
'
Approximate Mean High Water revision date description
TCL # 1534 /23/10
1) Deed Book 20983 Page 107 1 12/2/10 meter locations/runoff statement
2) Plan Book 248 Plan 1
3) Plan x/136 of 1962 SEPT 21, 2010
4) Plan Book 368 Plan 34 20 1 O12/15/10 20engineering40Comments
NORTH RIVER SHEET I OF 2 Date
5) Plan Book 424 Plan 45 Scale: 1"= 20'
INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS :
INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS —
BED DETAIL SIMPLE DYNAMIC METHOD CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF AREAS
SOILS IN AREA OF CHAMBERS ASSUMED TO BE SANDS WITH RAPID PERCOLATION
RATE OF GREATER THAN 2MPI. SOIL PERCOLATION RATE ASSUMPTION BASED VISUAL
'/ - 2 INCH WASHED, OBSERVATION AND DATA FROM 21E REPORTS
CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE 6" MINIMUM NON TRAFFIC AREAS BACKFILL MATERIAL
GEOTEXTILE WRAP — NATIVE, OR RAWLS RATES FOR SAND IS 8.27"/hr INFILTRATION RATE
AR 140N SERIES
OR APPROVED EQUAL ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER — FILL PER DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 1E�c 52 LENGTH) A RATE OF 2.41•/hr WAS USED TO BE CONSERVATIVE
48• Rv--Fx IMPERVIOUS AREA
TARGET DEPTH FACTOR = 0.6'
e ® ® Rv = 0.6"/12"/FTX 1260SF (ROOF AREA) = 63CF FOR LOT C1 WHICH HAS THE LARGER ROOF AREA
�� SJI
I ��� ��IP�� ��fLi ����� 7 ER
(AVG.LOU) Rv = 63CF
63CF = 40.6SF
77 12' SIDE VIEW A = [(0.3)(.5') + i' + 2.41-/hr X 2hr]
x - 12"/hr
A=RvAD+Kt)
A = 40.6SF MINIMUM REQUIRED SURFACE AREA FOR THE
qJ _. BOTTOM OF THE SYSTEM USING RAWLS RATE
`/ ro FOR SAND
C
12' V=A X D V = 40.6SF X [(0.3)(0.5') + 1'1 = 46.7CF
V = 46.7CF IS THE STORAGE VOLUME DETERMINED WITH
34' THE SIMPLE DYNAMIC METHOD
34" 6" 4" T SECTION NEW
CONCLUSION: BOTTOM OF SYSTEM AREA PROVIDED: 73.5SF > 40.65SF CALCULATED
QUICK4 STANDARD CHAMBER STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED: 73.1CF > 46.7CF CALCULATED
DRAWDOWN TIME = Ry a 63CF = 4.3hr
(K)(BOTTOM AREA) (2.41"/hr)(73.5SF)
OR EQUAL 12"/hr
DRAWDOWN TIME(T) = T = 4.3hr < 72hr ALLOWABLE
INFIL TRA TION SED DETAIL S
(Not to scale)
1. FOUNDATION DRAIN PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE 20 PERFORATED PIPE.
PERFORATIONS TO BE LAID AT BOTTOM. THE TOP OF PIPE TO BE AT
OR BELOW THE TOP OF THE FOOTING.
THE EXIT FOR THE FOUNDATION DRAIN SHALL BE SLOPED TO INFILTRATOR
1"x1" STAKE SYSTEM 0 17
DRAIN OUTLET TO BE SOLID SCHEDULE 20 SOLID PIPE. CONTRACTOR MY CHOOSE
FILTER FABRIC TO USE MORE THAT ONE OUTLET TO INFILTRATOR SYSTEM.
FLOW
SADDLE CONNECTION WITH WYE 2. NO OTHER DRAINS TO BE TIED INTO THE FOUNDATION DRAIN
BACKFILL 3. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THOMAS MANNETTA INC. 24 HOURS BEFORE THE
6" DEEP TRENCH STAINLESS STEEL STRAPPING START DATE OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE FOUNDATION DRAIN IF REQUIRED DRAIN WILL
11-111TIII-
BE INSPECTED DURING INSTALLATION PROCESS AT NO DELAY TO THE CONTRACTOR.
1 EGTON
17I I T BUILDING CONN
UNDISTURBED SOIL
<11A
TYPICAL FOUNDATION
PE _I WER .
TYPICAL SECTION e MINIM PER FOOL I SE
EXISTING SEWER
COUPLER
PIZ
B n
FABRIC (TYP) if I!1i!�` uE� "
STAKES GENERAL NOTES:
SECTION B
SECTION A SECTION B SADDLE SHALL NOT BE CEMENTED TO PIPE. SADDLES <
SHALL HAVE RUBBER CASKETS AND SHALL BE TIGHTENED
SECTION A WITH STRAPS
SADDLE MAY BE USED TO CONNECT TO EXISTING PVC, CONCRETE OR CAST IRON
FENCE JOINT PLAN FULL WYE CONNECTION MAY BE USED
'd a
a
FENCE JOINT ELEVATION
FOUNDATION DAMPPROORNG
TYPICAL SEWER CONNEC TION
EROSION CONTROL FENCE =
(Not to scale) (Not to scale) NATIVE BACKFILL a
4"SCH2O PERFORATED PIPE
PIPE TO BE SLOPED TO OUTLET
n
4.
GEOTEXTILE WRAP
MIRAFl 140N SERIES
OR APPROVED EQ AL - PROPOSED SI TE PLAN
- �1, ..
TEE BRANCH �I�U "'`'` A T
IN 8" PVC MAIN F— 14R PEARL STREET
FINISHED GRADE 4' PVC SERVICE
12' MIN. O.k. a LOT C1 SAUNDERS ST.
CURB BOX S' MIN SLOPE 2.0% IN
MAX SLOPE 15.0% SALEM
W/DRAIN , MA 01970
," CURB STOP I FOUNDA TION DRAIN DETAILS," CORPORATION ,' SERVICE TUBING APPLICANT/ JEFF HOLLORAN
STOP OWNER: 41 FAIRMOUNT STREET
(Not to scale) SALEM, MA 01970
SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK
OR FOOT PIECE ENGINEER:
+
+ THOMAS MANNE'TTA INCORPORATED
COMPACTED GRAVEL + + + + F� 11A OLD RIGHT ROAD — IPSWICH, MA 01938
+ + + + + + :y„ VERNONI. �G PHONE: (978) 356-7056 EMAIL: TOM@THOMASMANNETTA.COM
+ + + + + + UNDISTURBED SOIL 3 LeBLANC
+ + + + + + + „c1 CIVIL y
+ + + + + + No. 30491 DRAWING FILE: C:\TCMDRAW2010\Saunders 8-18
3 ,
1 S �'b` TCL # 1534 ATE: 8/23/10
revision date description
TYPICAL WA TER SER VICE 4 " SEWER SER VICE CONNECTION AUG 23, 2010 ' 12/15/10 calculations
(Not to scale) (Not to scale) SHEET 2 OF 2 Date 20 0 20 40
Scale: 1"= 20'