Loading...
7 ROSLYN STREET - ZBA (2) 7 Roslyn St. R-3 Manuel & Olivia Machado b s (Ilii of 'Salem, �Hagsadjusetts Pourb of 'Appli July 3, 1991 Notice is hereby given that as of July 2, 1991 the: decision of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the City :Clerk to grant the petition of Manuel & Olivia Machado for variances to allow construction of a garage at 7 Roslyn St . BOARD OF APPEALS Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board AbPe8l from tfds decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass_General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the dafiaof filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Purltu,nt is tAa:a. ise,rera! la Ch .. e 808, Se_:ti-,n '1, the`lariance or 9 :e ';,F ein s�-J nct i .ke off." u'tp a copy of the c'• iors, -e��`np, ihs c:rtfi:.aioi. of a C ty C)c k that 20 dz.vs have et_.pse.d:a.. no npjeal has peen tii.^.d, or teat, if xuch annex! h7,s been 11 cd, ttol he.:: been d4:rni=sec or de,,ied s rzcorded in the e!trth Eger. Re^-,istry of Deeds and indexed un^er 1l;e name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted !o the owleir's Certificate of Title.. BOARD OF APPEAL - it DATE OF HEARING oZ6 f PETITIONER LOCATION LaJ_ / MOTION: TO GRANT / SECOND TO DENY Cr SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT _ DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL RICHARD` PEB010 EDWARD LUZINSKI MARY JANE STTRGWOLT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS / RONALD PLANTE ✓ ARTHUR LABRECQUE CONDITIONS: L 2 �} / !/ 6 ��� � �� � �� VVVV ° Oxy � � �t_i v �"` a� _ M IJi L I l u, (Mita of -'�ttlem, 'Rttssarljyprtts Bottra of 'I DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. (R-3) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonic, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage in this R-3 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Mr. Machado presented his case with no others speaking in favor. 2. An abutter, Mr. McCarthy, opposed the petition as presented by the petitioners but upon an amended design & conditions, he withdrew his objection. 3. This is the most feasible location on the lot for the garage. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. DECISION ON THE PETITION .OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. , SALEM page two 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, 4-1 , (Mr. Bencal opposed) to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. 2. All construction be as per the plans and dimensions submitted and amended, lowering the height of the eve to eight (8) feet and the pitch of the roof be reduced to 6 - 12. 3. Exterior finish of the proposed garage be compatible with the existing structure. 4. A building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 7. No commercial storage of any products in this garage. Variance granted June 26, 1991 R chid Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 dt the Mass. General laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date.of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chanter 808, Section 11, the Variance or ?,:^_pial Permit granted herein snail not take effect until a copy of the eecision, hearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissC4 or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or r is recorded and noted sn the owner's Certificate of Title. �� r— BOARD OF APPEAL r tv ro C) 2� V7 Cita of ttlem, � ttssttclr�i�srtts Ss Dura 0{ AIJVeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. (R-3) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage in this R-3 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Mr. Machado presented his case with no others speaking in favor. 2. An abutter, Mr. McCarthy, opposed the petition as presented by the petitioners but upon an amended design & conditions, he withdrew his objection. 3. This is the most feasible location on the lot for the garage. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. P DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. , SALEM page two 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, '4-1 , (Mr. Bencal opposed) to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: t . All construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. 2. All construction be as per the plans and dimensions submitted and amended, lowering the height of the eve to eight (8) feet and the pitch of the roof be reduced to 6 - 12. 3. Exterior finish of the proposed garage be compatible with the existing structure. 4. A building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 7. No commercial storage of any products in this garage. Variance granted June 26, 1991 C n \ R chr and Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 dt the Mass. General laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date.of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk, Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chao'er 808, Section 11, the Variance or 2P%xci31 Pcrmit granted herein si,ali not tatce effect until a copy of the eecision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 2.0 days have Napsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been fired, that it has been cismisseW or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or r is recorded and noted on the oi,,mer's Certificate of Title. r— BOARD OF APPEAL, N 07 l )I n (fitu of ttlem, lzmad-rttgli I C :Battra of �Aupeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. (R-3) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage in this R-3 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Mr. Machado presented his case with no others speaking in favor. 2. An abutter, Mr. McCarthy, opposed the petition as presented by the petitioners but upon an amended design & conditions, he withdrew his objection. 3. This is the most feasible location :on the lot for the garage. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. , SALEM page two 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, 4-1 , (Mr. Bencal opposed) to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. 2. All construction be as per the plans and dimensions submitted and amended, lowering the height of the eve to eight (8) feet and the pitch of the roof' be reduced to 6 - 12. 3. Exterior finish of the proposed garage be compatible with the existing structure. 4. A building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 7. No commercial storage of any products in this garage. Variance granted June 26, 1991 RR c�ebonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, If any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 d! the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be flied within 20 days after the date.of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance pr Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the eecision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has baen filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or L is recorded and noted on the ovrper's Certificate of Title. r— BOARD OF APPEAL r- r1J C► D+ o� G.O r. i t 4'q .. 'JI (I�itu of �ttlem, �fflussttrl efts ` r��� „ �attra ofpeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. (R-3) A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage in this R-3 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Mr. Machado presented his case with no others speaking in favor. 2. An abutter, Mr. McCarthy, opposed the petition as presented by the petitioners but upon an amended design & conditions, he withdrew his objection. 3. This is the most feasible location .on the lot for the garage. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: I . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MANUEL & OLIVIA MACHADO FOR VARIANCE AT 7 ROSLYN ST. , SALEM page two 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, 4-1 , (Mr. Bencal opposed) to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be in compliance with city and state building codes. 2. All construction be as per the plans and dimensions submitted and amended, lowering the height of the eve to eight (8) feet and the pitch of the roof be reduced to 6 - 12. 3. Exterior finish of the proposed garage be compatible with the existing structure. 4. A building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. 7. No commercial storage of any products in this garage. Variance granted June 26, 1991 2 A chard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 n! the Mass.General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date.of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11,the Variance or ?�ecial Pcrmit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the eecision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 27 days have ciapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisselit or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted 9n the ovver's Certificate of TRIG. r- r— BOARD OF APPEAL' Ste. APPEAL CASE NO. . . .. .. .... .. .. .. .. . . . . . of Salem, 'Mttssa r4usetts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locate at NO. . .7. RO.QIYn .StreLQ1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. ell Z3 u rr,a The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the foN owim"g reasons: Lot Coverage The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of. Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the gqfollowing reasons: // � 1/ J VCur ran Ce- '�f'om �-o� CoveCcr7C l� a 'I�" ConSrrcxfio� Owner. :?anuel ? Olivia Tacl}adc , , , , , , , , , Address.7. Itoslyn .Street.,, @alenl,,,U4. . ,, Telephone. 74574875. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. Manuel & Olivi2 T;lachado , , , Address. . . ,Roslyn Stre_�t� Salem,r7A„ Date. . .June .3 , 199?. . . . . Te ephone.' 745-4875 . . . . . . . . . . . : B . . . . . . . . . C �� • Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION .........................................:...................... PEII*IIONI:R.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDI I IONS ........................... .................................... ......................... ....................................... ..................................I...................... ...... ................................................................. .................................I............................... ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... 0 19 �xaP %Citu of �ttlPm, C����ttrhu5Fft5 cire 'Department 1}teaaquartcrs uohc - 48 Y 7�- afgV tF `'-tIrri Joseph F. Sullivan airm, fin. 01970 Chief City of Salem Date: June 26, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: or-7 Fmslyn Street-_ Manuel and Olivia Machado Salem, MA 01970 The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: the mnc+nrl-inn of a garnge subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) (til*t*) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic stmke detectors. The applicant will be required to contact the Salem Fire Preven- tion Bureau in order to bring their dwelling units up to code relative to automatic srrnkp rlpfPc+nre_ Alen them i-, nrAgent1_y an unrpgi etpredyehi 1 on the p}'1'=rtV ii- rmrei- hp mnnypd, nrdinnne-e Anpc nM- allow immgictererl vehicles on private pL=rty, 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: file applicant t,�.co.mtt.a, Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 June 25, 1991 Richard Bencal , Chairman Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman Bencal : The Salem Historical Commission is in receipt of your agenda for June 26, 19-9.1:of which pet `ions for 25 Beach Ave . , 152 Bayview Ave . , `k7� Roslyn_ Street,-1-21 & 123 Boston Street, 86 Summer Street and 92 Columbus Ave . will be heard. Enclosed for your information are building survey forms for these six properties, which are between 75 and 150 years old. In addition, please be advised that the location proposed for construction of a single family dwelling at Skerry Street Court is surrounded by historic properties including 1 & 2 Skerry Street Court and 64 Bridge Street . While the Commission takes no position on these petitions, we are hopeful that the decisions made on these properties will be with careful consideration of their historic fabric and those in their surrounding neighborhoods . In this regard, the Commission would be pleased to offer design review, should the Board of Appeal request such services . Thank you for your consideration . Sincerely, THE SALEM HISTORICAL C ZSION Annie C . Harris Chairman J4136 THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS) I M A- \CL E DATA FORM B - BUILDING (9 p . AREA FORM NO. MASSACHUSETTS- HISTORICAL COMMISSION 33- � 80 BOYLSTON STREET BOSTON, MA 02116 - - „ Salem ; ., . � e55 7 Roslyn Street oric NaMe Mary Hamlin House `• v Present Residential k Original Residential K IPTION 1914-15 Ce Plan, directories e colonial Revival/Craftsman is iteCt A.J. McDuff Sketch Map: Draw mp showing property's location in relation to nearest cross streets and/or Exterior Wall Fabric �r„neo geographical features. Indicate all buildings between inventoried property and nearest Outbuildings intersection(s). Indicate north Major Alterations (with dates) None L A A A YE Condition Excellent S N 5 � t �Il Q Moved No Date s 1 Acreage . Pgg than one Setting Tn busy. rPciAPntia, ArPa - UTM REFERENCE Recorded by ,, rrhfi , ,G Proaarvari nn Acenr USGS QUADRANGLE Organization 4a,Pm planning; nonh. SCALE Date NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA STATEMENT (if applicable) ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Describe important architectural features and evaluate in terms of other buildings within the community. 7 Roslyn Street is a well-detailed house in an uncommon form for this area. It is a 2 1/2 story house with a front gable which projects over the second story. A two-story bay exists at the east end of the facade , with the entry at the west; a large window exists between. A one-story flat-roofed porch extends across the facade from the bay window, featuring an ornate balustrade and stuccoed supports with flanking fluted square supports . Fluted pilasters frame the seoond-story windows. Sash include diamond-paned upper sash and 6/1 . A paired window is recessed in the gable end . Cornices at the head of both floors are dentilled . The pedimented gable end has cornice returns . The 'foundation is granite. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Explain the role owners played in local or state history and how the building relates to the development of the community. This house was built during the reconstruction of Salem following the fire on June 25 , 1914. The plans were designed by A.J. MacDuff for Mrs. Mary E. Hamlin of Salem and were approved in October of 1914 . According to the 1915 directory, Mrs . Hamlin, a saleswoman of Wagner Hill Remnants , had as tenants Hazen Hamlin, a student , and Ora Currier, a traveling salesperson in Boston. i BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES Salem City Directories Salem Rebuilding Commission Plans 8/85 — o 0 6 -ir I I i s [V� µ V V � 3 0 V T r> ;. 1 � � L 3 C& a t- 114 v LPO s w QO w v x T LL If W C'b —4— eb 4:1 x v 40 E d T � 3 � 8 � 0 O ® © D � � 6� -TERN LAND-SURVFY ASSOCIATES (NC. F,5296 LANo suRvers 40 LOWELL STREE LAND COURT PEASOMMA.0196C BOUNDARY 5 31-8121 SUBDIVISION TOPOGRAPHIC PLOT PLAN OF LAND MORTGAGE LOCATED IN PropocrA !e'xa�' SALEM MASS. Gargh� - CIVIL ENGINEERINGPERMIT �Gt64ciCLr. S I ��orn!!tr'15f�a ZONING EVALUATION t S T rro n r`a r Alk P,0 el L E DRAINAGE \ SANITARY DESIGN K ZZZ' / NJF 140LIN P�f 3ATLNELDE2 ' 3 sz2i a NO 0 lit- 66' beGo' R05LYN STREET a I I hereby certify that. I have examined the premises and all casements, encroachments and buildings are located on the ground as shown. I further certify that the buildings shown conformed to the dimensic zoning laws of SALEA1 /:-ASS when constructed. I 'further certify that the property 75Nc/ '�0q%0ed in the establish� °Fx' rhpr° SCALE /'�• 3v' i� s c area. oma'' CHRISTOPHER G,n\•6 DATE J U/r= 8 19e9 R. M ^ REFERENCE BK 6935 PG 906 C stop er 9. M 17 T5 c It 017 y♦ "o "o �-1 ]5 �M I D ` T .1 N '. O p ro l a g v 262 7ael –1 1 :518 — I N m o 5775 3,;Do 2_°u� m - 4,COO :,:iaE ti,52 3o O , '.8,o C112o ro 1' 5;4 50 � 243 2 c. - J` '7 ' 600 O2- 3 0 Q 6 F� 14194 0 �J 3v aD I j 6 �J - P N r bn .. 2 26;0. 253 ',m I ` 5� ' . J•'' 430`' DII �I ---�-- 11964 o`'s o A 24g 237 267 x — �. --'I,.�. Imo...-. 496 �. x250 N 235D 0 o m O ^' -r s I 25 D •.N r— T ! � .2'4 `nil X 25 5 254 6 36 p c, 75 9s 491 G,.LJ 2 g54O ,`960 ,2� e,� N 5 �...< a5g �3yLy"6� 233 eo 1 • J�Jss 40 • io ST RE E� Co o 60 o to 60 sT ° CD IN 283 + c 52' 8,20 ;,36,% D A 600 5828so m .l 468 279� N ; 3i1 q ;20 5.5 a. 3655 � -- 276 6i50 t. 2 _88 72 273 274 U278 e I'i a 3e, _ X42 2 i 277 a 4i5 u 5258 7 4,� + `1270463 Sru �o I5. - sb ST •o T" $451 `o ^' 1348 347 IN Iz ,,37i 2°3 1s � 314 313 - ' 6574 IN 315 met 3a t 11 +I+ 37n v 34a C3 4/25 204 6,50 550 9 C,,, r ` 6c N 90 m ^� o �v � ..I 9000 0 , I n' ?23 1,�_YJR' 3000 9055 0 5 , N u a 1` r,.,,7 i 0 6 d s -+ 4 � i cis s o v � S v � n � � (1 S r 0 4e. k �s r- � n p' � w• - 0 c �� w Wo 14 W W° Lb po W I �b rb a 3ulY 1 � l C tv of ttlem, '4flassuchu"tts ire Departmerd XeaDyuartcra 48 Pfgctte ,*treet Joseph F. Sullivan a*alem> 4A- 01970 Chief City of Salem Date: June 26, 1991 Board of Appeal One Salem Green RE: 7 Roslyn Street Manuel and Olivia Machado Salem, MA 01970 'The Salem Fire Departmant has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or Variance to allow: the mnatntctinn of a garage subject to the following conditions: 1- This property (has no) (MOW compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of auipmatic smoke detectors. The applicant will be required to Contact the Salem Fire Preven- iltion Bureau in order to bring their dwelling units up to code relative to automatic snake detectnra_ Alm, there is prpsently an unregistered vehicle on the pmpqrtX, it must he rprmved, ordinance dmg not ;gllow unregistered vehicles on private _party. 2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa- chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa- chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire and public safety. 4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work. i ed, Norman P. .LaPointe Fire Inspector CC: file applicant ia CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Manuel&Olivia Machado for Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage at 7 Roslyn St.(R-3).Said hearing to be held Wednesday, June 26, 1991 at 7:00 p.m., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 t © 0 B 8 0 u � s 1 • CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Manuel&Olivia Machado for Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage at 7 Roslyn St.(R-3).Said hearing to be held Wednesday, June 26, 1991 at 7:00 p.m., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 © 0 B 8 8 N � o t t • t Y s s • t • • • r s t t _. CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Manuel&Olivia Machado for Variance from lot coverage to allow construction of a garage a17 Roslyn St.(R-3).Said hearing to be held Wednesday, June 26, 1991 at 7:00 p.m., One Salem Green, 2nd Boor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman June 12, 19, 1991 r, e i w u s APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . CRT of "qttlem, fflasstttlTuseffs �,. ?3varb of � sPttl S� �D@iL TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land 10d at No. . .7. R0.Q1YXI .Stxq@t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. '' . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. u\ �IG / 1 �1 €- S Lo 4913 ccs-x rr - n The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: Lot Coverage The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of. Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: ` UQ(-Ia✓1[e _rr /om Lo� C.ex-,ermlt OF A �QfmS�P Owner. T,jY ,noel. Q1iyia.M.agha.do Address.7. Roslyn ,Street@alerq,,, 7�5-4875 Telephone. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. Tvlanuel & OliyiP- T"'a.cliado ..... . , , , , Address. . . Uoslyn Stre t; S. . . .. ..A 1991 Date. . .J 1e .3. . . . . . . . . . . . Tel hone. 745-4875 / „ By. � 7� . . . . . . .y. Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PEIIIIONFR................. ........................ ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDI"I IONS ............................ .................................... ........... ............ ....................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. ............................................................ PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... 19 rJ I i 1. i T O t + s r I 4 _ � LU 0 6 4 I I � i s s . . k + Ov- o 0 S 0 CL it N �'. Q _ � S `y v as s v U ! _�J U4 I�p �v � a 3 ° H w Cb 6 . J X308 LAS-FERN LAN USURVEY ASSOCIATES ( NC. F5246' . I =SURVErs 40 LOWELL STREET LAND COURT PEAEODY*MA.O(960 BOUNDARY 531-8121 SUBOMSpN TOPOGRAPHIC PLOT PLAN OF. LAND MORTGAGE LOCATED IN . Pcopocra , xa,, SALEM MASS. Ga;rghc CIVIL ENGINEERINGPERMIT ZONING Eva ALUAnCN t s' f rDrn re,?r /VIS Poo L E DRAINAGE SANRARY let by B DESIGN i NfF HOLIN P�F' 3A7 NELDE2 ' 3 Sro27 � o. IYo 9 c (06' R65LYN STREET Y V I hereby certify that. I have examined the premises and all casements, encroachments and buildings are located on the ground as shown. I further certify that the buildings shown conformed to the dimension zoning laws of SALEM fiASS when constructed. I further certify that the property 75 Mai �v o.*gated SCALE I"• 3a ' in the establish 'k- area. /Orr CHRISTOPHER aN� DATE J U/r= 8 1988 8 rd R. "y REFERENCE BK 69.34 PG 296 C stop or i7 A5 rERN SAND-SURVEY ASSOCIATES euro suRVEYs 40 LOWELL STREET ii►No COURT 'PEABODY,MA.01960 BOUNDARY 5 31-8121 S OCNISION TOPOGRAPHIC PLOT .PLAN OF LAND MORTGAGE LOCATED IN Propocr& lea'xai' SALEM MASS., Gari _ CIVIL ENGINEERING �Gt64c(t:b. b � �roM �t�$lo<.1 PERMIT' PLANS t S I star Poo L ZONING EVALUATICN Of DRAINAGE SANITARY DESIGN NjF 140LIN a P�F 3ATUELDE2 ' 3 ST00 o f /to 9 G. Ibr (00' � s ROS L vN STREETS ma y I hereby certify that I have- examined the premises and all casements, encroachments and buildings are located on the ground as shown. I further certify that the buildings shown conformed to the dimension zoning laws of SALER /:%ASS when constructed. I further certify that the property lS NaT � ..,hocat ed SCALE 1'= 3u in the establishe�� a �rd area. Ors CHRISTOPHER M, DATE J O/r= 8 1959 R. M 'P N 3 REFERENCE BK 00934 PG 966 C stophdr K. 17 EA6 TERN LAND SURVE ASSOO ATES ( NC. F 5z9� u_ wosuRVEYs 40 LOWELL STREET LAND COURT PEABODY,MA.01960 BOUNDARY 531-8121 SUBDIVISION TOPOGRAPHIC PLOT PLAN OF, LAND MORTGAGE LOCATED IN Propocea !s'xa�' SALEM MASS.. Garq,Yc CIVIL ENGINEERING �Gf'64CI�S. S 1 �roM PERMIT PLANS t $1 poo L E ZONING EVALUATICN DRAINAGE SANITARY DESIGN —ZZ3'— i NJF 140LIN a Nfr 3ATUELDE 3 S7o21 o s a NO 7 r_ v. _9{, O T ill 7 /ob' ROSLYN STREET I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and all casements, encroachments and buildings are located on the ground as shown. I further certify that the buildings shown .conformed to the dimension zoning laws of SALEM /4ASS when constructed. I further certify. that the property 75 NaT �.., ocaxed SOF ,l, �'€fs'� SCALE /'� 3u in the establishes Ard area. o� CHRISTOPHER GTS DATE J bit-L S 19F9 R. M w REFERENCE SK (01.34 PG 306 ctfrfstoph& K. M_ 17 C, Kk. j) (D 0 -4 co eo LL r, LO F A 54 '40 23, •41. Yom, '31 U) I23b 114 aVF 5 A 7, OD -T E Iq R 0 U 216-718L " ,,4 6464 210 a 60 C?. In 65 trm fn 0 CQ o N C\I Z I rD IZJ %C) co to too) AD 'm J 14 1I •I '0 60 P, OA L" N Ul A tD t�4 Zf34 Oj N l4 000 . 45 tO 264 C%I w N 2650: 0 'IT ST. F D M 0 NTIO p 40 40 0 ❑ T, 40 tn j CC) 2,40 C3 LC) ?4 C\1 1 S 7 CD to 70) C-4 -j C,j cli OD a, ?.4 2 0 0 Q W two to �5 in O�rl�q� Fl 1 , . (M -i O� Com C'I to lj� -0 Ck v43 244 zIn CP 46 CQ N .......-- ------- ----- 4. 4 n .11 � -, . BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE, /41 I,�e l, I 2 4 3 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: NAF1. 33 L.0 T. 0"25 2 SUFF. 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0007 ROSLYN STREET' 7 6 A.(-3R)FqS3F D OWNF R MACHADO MAM11-1 8 7 - ----- -a S .. .. . ........ I...... 2 1 IIIA 0 8Pia`hF 1..... MATIAN ""8EjbPF'RTV`AD R gs ��qqF. rL�OLJNF 72 10 A 12 • M 13 14 11 — 33 0:254 0006 ROSL YN STREET TSIONIS L.EON1DAS 9 AUGUSTUS STREET ISO 12 ANN E M."Ap-00y "A 04914.0 16 Y" .. ............. .......... L7 -)SL S tRtET'K l 1, Y -4 1 R17AL 7 4� a ........ . 66 'W -V'N 2, ;`A�, 'IT R 5, 1;, 14 LWF Si. 8 O 19 14 1 20 15 .......l, J FlikiEN,LAWRE4CE, �Jl -1AI jdl4 PAPTA A � -4 MARKOS CONSTANCE TR SALEN MA 01970 22 0 17 — 33 0274 201 0004 HOLLY STREET LADA ANTHONY C 4 HOLLY ST I 24 AL.EO ADA I ... . .. 2$ ,a I I ARTNY '-11 PICIC OHN (,!L�.;.,IS,T1 6 Qp�?2 jp TRC -- A v,��, ,, I'",�I l� e, Yl's E�T, 20 �4............ ,I*R "E" S AL E M tef A 019,7 0 27 §.......... 21 L9 22 CLAUDETTE Y SALEM NA 01970 30 0 2331 — 33 0277 0001"AHOLLY STREET WHARF'- REGINA N 2A HOLLY ST 24 G A L EM 32 2— MA G,4,9z,7Q, — $ ......* ........ ....... 33 W 0 77 9 b 2 L"'A.P" Fsse My. &v in, T4 . .....1 1, 1 T5 Al l, I IMAR I LYN' 27 — 3 UAICIRE, 6 28 LOVASCO KIN A SALEM te[A 01970 37 2 0 9— 33 0281 0005 ROSLYN STREET DICKINSON FRED E 4.4.4 NORTH ST 3C MCCUIV117 VAREM B CZORGETOWN MA Q 41 41 Z,k? iAES 11ANT, t 6,bA TREEL,,,,, 9�lRf')s 32 1 7*1 "e 1 42 b(i ........ 43 33 T4 T .-A-- 0. 34 '60 ot 45 — VOULA SALEM MA 01970 0 — 46 35 T7 0 36 48 .. ..........I'll 7 ... ....... ...... 4 3 l% ...... .........50 . 3— I e 39 $ 40 53 41 0 — 0 2 l—,"I'le 57 I�e K,e ....... 5 9 'e, 1,1 1e. ..... ... II e Fo e . 61 62 l 0, .... ...... el 11ll el� ..... ... x8. a5 ... 0 • 3 4 7 CARON,' e , P EJ,ER 75 'e 5 R ro . I I... ell', 79 7