Loading...
2 ROSEDALE AVENUE - ZBA 2 Rosedo_1e Rver�v� universal© www.myuniversalop.com phone:1-866 756-4676 UNV12113 MADSINUSA I f t Zoning Board Project Status Sheet Address & Applicant: Date Submitted to BOA: Clerk Stamp: iIariances Only - Constructive Approval Date: (1 00 daps from rr,,;;) �/ Abutters List Requested: d Abutters Notice Sent: Notice to Abutting Cities & Towns, Councillors: i�/Legal Notice posted at City Hall: (14 das,,e,,» A�egal Notice Emailed & Confirmed: egal Notice Posted on Web: genda to Applicant: Applicant's email address or fax number to send agenda: Opened at Meeting: --aI g t n Continued Meetings:_ Extension Form(s) Signed & Clerk Stamped? Closed at Meeting: � Decision: Gr(D.vye� Decision Filed: (, Appeal Period Over: after deciaimi filed) ` (21"day �/ Decision Sent to Applicant: lob d Notice of Decision Sent to abutters cities and towns, councillors: ZBA ACTION FORM BOARa�'MEIvI�ER�u� n;� ;�%I(3TIC?N ,SECOND`,�UO,TE Date: 5/ 1 � ' (o Rebecca Curran (Chair .+ Mike Duffy Petitioner: 2 ROSe c�,o-� Tom Watkins Peter Copelas Address: Ave Jimm Tsitsmos Jim Hacker(Alt. Paul Viccica(Alt.) p q — Conditions: Total: Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes,ordinances,codes and regulations. DAll construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 1All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. [J`Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. Y6xterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. dA Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. ❑Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to,the Planning Board. ❑Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted does not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the structure(s)located on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty percent (50%)of its floor area or more than fifty percent(50%)of its replacement cost at the time of destruction.If the structure is demolished by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent(50%)of its replacement cost or more than fifty percent(50%)of its floor area at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance. ❑ V 4'Q W , ` � e •1 N CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS -, , BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSAC-984 Kn,iBERLEY DRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-98466 A 8 S MAYOR CITY CI E:, June 29, 2016 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of NORMAN & MARGARET ROBERTS seeking a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures to allow the petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure at the property of 2 ROSEDALE AVE (Map 31 Lot 264)( RI Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on May 18, 2016 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 4 11. No testimony was heard on that date. The petition was continued to June 15, 2016 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsinos,Tom Watkins. The Petitioner seeks a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures to allow the petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure. Statements of fact: 1. Attorney Grover presented the petition on behalf of the applicants. 2. In the petition date-stamped April 26, 2016 the Petitioner requested a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures. 3. The petitioner proposed to replace an existing garage with a one-story addition to create a new family room on the fust floor. The petitioner also proposed to remove and replace a sunroom. 4. The existing sunroom does not comply with the side yard setback and the expansion of the sunroom will further reduce the side yard setback to seven (7D feet where ten (10) feet is required. 5. The existing garage is 11.6' feet from the side yard setback. The proposed one-story addition will create a side yard setback nonconformity of eight (8) feet where ten (10) feet is required. 6. There is parking on the existing driveway that does and will continue to accommodate two (2) cars parked side-by-side. 7. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure. 8. At the public hearing a petition was submitted by the applicant with sixteen (16) residents in support of the project. M9. At the public hearing members of the public spoke one (1) spoke in favor and none (0) spoke in opposition to the petition. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project:2 Rosedale Ave. Page 2 of 3 The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Special Permit: The Board finds that the structural change is not substantially more detrimental that the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. 1. Social, economic and community needs served by the proposal- The property is a single family home and will remain a single family home and does not impact the community. 2. Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading-There are no substantial changes to traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading. 3. Adequacy of utilities and other public services- There are no changes to utilities or other public services. 4. Impacts on the natural environment, including drainage- There are no significant changes that would impact the natural environment,including drainage. 5. Neighborhood character-The proposal is in keeping with the neighborhood character. 6. Potential fiscal impact,including the impact on City tax base and employment is positive. Special Conditions: 1. The structure will remain a single-family home. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsinos, Tom Watkins) and none (0) opposed, to grant a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures to allow the petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure, subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: Standard Conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board. i . V City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project:2 Rosedale Ave. Page 3 of 3 Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any,.shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Macracbuseas Genera!Iuw.r Chapter 40A, and.rba!!be fxled within 20 days of fihng of this deagon in the office of the City Clffk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts Genera!Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the I/arianre or Special Permitgranted herein shall not take 5Yect until a copy of the decinon bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deedf. �conmrT,t,t CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS t BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHf§WTJLg9'M A 8- ' C MMBERLEY DRiscoLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 J MAYOR June 29, 2016 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of NORMAN & MARGARET ROBERTS seeking a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures to allow the petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure at the property of 2 ROSEDALE AVE (Map 31 Lot 264)( R1 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on May 18, 2016 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 5 11. No testimony was heard on that date. The petition was continued to June 15, 2016 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsinos,Tom Watkins. The Petitioner seeks a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures to allow the petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure. Statements of fact: 1. Attorney Grover presented the petition on behalf of the applicants. 2. In the petition date-stamped April 26, 2016 the Petitioner requested a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures. 3. The petitioner proposed to replace an existing garage with a one-story addition to create a new family room on the first floor. The petitioner also proposed to remove and replace a sunroom. 4. The existing sunroom does not comply with the side yard setback and the expansion of the sunroom will further reduce the side yard setback to seven (7) feet where ten (10') feet is required. 5. The existing garage is 11.6' feet from the side yard setback. The proposed one-story addition will create a side yard setback nonconformity of eight (8') feet where ten (10') feet is required. 6. There is parking on the existing driveway that does and will continue to accommodate two (2) cars parked side-by-side. 7. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure. 8. At the public hearing a petition was submitted by the applicant with sixteen (16) residents in support of the project. 9. At the public hearing members of the public spoke one (1) spoke in favor and none (0) spoke in opposition to the petition. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29, 2016 Project:2 Rosedale osedale Ave. Page 2 of 3 The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Special Permit: The Board finds that the structural change is not substantially more detrimental that the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. 1. Social, economic and community needs served by the proposal- The property is a single family home and will remain a single family home and does not impact the community. 2. Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading-There are no substantial changes to traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading. 3. Adequacy of utilities and other public services- There are no changes to utilities or other public services. 4. Impacts on the natural environment, including drainage- There are no significant changes that would impact the natural environment,including drainage. 5. Neighborhood character-The proposal is in keeping with the neighborhood character. 6. Potential fiscal impact,including the impact on City tax base and employment is positive. Special Conditions: 1. The structure will remain a single-family home. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsinos, Tom Watkins) and none (0) opposed, to grant a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single and Two-Family Residential Structures to allow the Petitioner to expand the existing nonconforming structure, subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: Standard Conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project:2 Rosedale Ave. Page 3 of 3 (E& Chair Rebecca Curran, Char ' Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this deasron, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Lana Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Jaws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Speaal Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the dec on bearing the certificate of the City Clerk bas been fi<ed w th the Essex Soutb Registry of Deeds. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS %e�nr PETITION FORM CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS :'. BOARD OFAPPEAIiSIh 120 WASHINGTON STREET,311n FLOOR a T- SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 9�fM1NE DDP'� Thomas St.Pierre,Director of Inspectional Services Phone:978-619-5641 / Fax:978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DwseoLi, Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner i C MAYOR Phone:978-619-5685 /Fax:978-740-0404 u-- APT h �w TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: to DEPT' The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at:CpIV,Muhl, h"kNP Address: 2 Rosedale Avenue - Zoning District: R-1/ Entrance Corridor Overlay An application is being submitted to the Board of Appeal for the following reason(s): This statement must describe what you propose to build,the dimensions,the zone property is in,and the zoning requirements.(Example: 1 am proposing to construct a 10'x 10'one story addition to my home located at 3 Salem Lane, in the R-2 Zoning District. The Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum depth of the rear yard to be 30 feet. The current depth of my rear yard is 32 feet;the proposed addition would reduce the depth of the rear yard to 21 feet.) See Statement of Grounds Attached For this reason I am requesting: ( )Variance(s)from provisions of Section of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically from (i.e. minimum depth ofrearyard). What is allowed is (ft?sq ft?stories? %?), and what I am proposing is (ft?sq ft?stories? %?). ()o A Special Permit under Section 3.3.5 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to extend an existing nonconforming structure ( )Appeal of the Decision of the Building Inspector(described below): ( )Comprehensive Permit for construction of low or moderate income housing(describe below): Current Property Use: Single Family Are Lot Dimensions Included?(i)Yes ( )No Why? (Example:Two Family Home) The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and allow the project to be constructed as per the plans submitted,as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM The following written statement has been submitted with this application: ( ) For all Variance requests a written Statement of Hardship demonstrating the following must be attached: a) Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land,building,or structure involved, generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district; b) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involved substantial hardship to the applicant; and c) Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good,and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. (� For all Special Permit requests a Statement of Grounds must be attached.An application for a special permit for a nonconforming use or structure shall include a statement demonstrating how the proposed change shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood in accordance with Section 9.4 Special Permits. Such a statement should include reference to the following criteria: a) Social,econom c,or community needs served by the proposal; b) Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading; c) Adequacy of utilities and other public services; d) Impacts on the natural environment,including drainage; - e) Neighborhood character; and 0 Potential fiscal impact,including impact on City tax base and employment. ( ) For all Comprehensive Permits for construction of low or moderate income applicants should refer to M.G.L. Ch.40B § 20-23. Previous applications to the Board of Appeals involving this property have been submitted with this petition form. The Building Commissioner can provide documentation ofprevious applications to the petitioner or his representative. If different from petitioner. Petitioner: Norman & Margaret Roberts Property Owner: N/A Address: 2 Rosedale Avenue Address: Telephone: Telephone: Email: nrobe - fn d ,.o g Email: Signature: Signature: (Attached consent letter is also acceptable) Date: April 26,2016 Date: If different from petitioner. Representative: srott M. prnvor A TRUE Address: 27 Congress Street, Salem, MA ATTEST Telephone: 9 — Signature: Date: A i 26 2016 CITY CLERK DATE DPCD DATE This original application must be filed with the City Clerk. A STATEMENT OF GROUNDS The petitioners,Norman and Margaret Roberts, are proposing to expand their existing single family residence at 2 Rosedale Avenue with additions to both sides of the house. A two story addition will replace the existing garage to create a new family room on the first floor and a bedroom and bathroom on the second floor. A one story addition will replace and enlarge an existing sunroom. Presently, the sunroom does not comply with the side yard setback requirement of 10 feet and the expansion of that room will increase that nonconformity by reducing the set back to 7 feet. On the other side of the house, the two story addition will create a new side yard setback nonconformity of 5 feet. This extension of an existing nonconforming structure requires a Special Permit under Section 3.3.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board may issue a Special Permit under Section 3.3.5 of the Ordinance upon finding that the proposed change is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming structure. In this instance, the extension of the nonconforming nature of the structure is very minor and maintains adequate distance between the adjacent properties. The addition will allow an existing homeowner to remain in Salem and will increase the value of the property for tax purposes. There will be no increase in traffic and no additional public services required. The appearance of the house from the street will remain consistent with the neighborhood's character. For these reasons, the changes to this existing nonconforming structure will have no detrimental effect on the neighborhood. MAP 31 LOT 263 JEAN SACCO 1 RIVERWAY RD. WOOD FENCE 2.2'3 OFF PROPERTY LINE �� E 14 3 qg 35 �9A �j MAP 31 LOT 264 �Oao 1(0j p AREA = 8178 t S.F. tr ` PROPOSED LA p m BULKHEAD \10. PSS 9� trs 5 existingIst f 13} to remake " bulk P OPOSEO ea e 01 IE STORY" S MAP 31 LOT 328 A DM6N - WILLIAM PANZINI \ EDNA PANZINI gt zz'-a _ por,.W r 3 RIVERWAY RD. 2 1/2 story romooved 11 6 f1.� iv be existing dwelling reAD01T1 N Ik garage & landing #2 o to be removed Q 1\ _ Isnding n p 15' t ontyard setback M o Ln O 04 115.00' �/e / S 46'48'40" W S 57'29'00" E WOOD FENCE 3.27• FF OFF ICf OPROPERTY LINE ROSEDALE AVENUE ` -�A ZONING DISTRICT — Rt & ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OVERLAY PROPOSED REQUIRED EXISTING ADDITION W LOT AREA 115,000 8178 8178 LOT FRONTAGE 100 115.00' 115.00' FRONT 15 19.5' 21't SIDE 10 9.7' 7't REAR 30 45.1' Orf PLAN OF LAND LOT COVERAGE 30% 16% 18.7% 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM 2N OF&f.4SS PROPERTY OF 023 9cSG NORMAN M. ROBERTS. JR. GAIL L 0 SMITH m MARGARET J. ROBERTS I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDINGS c° SMITH y HEREON ARE LOCATED ON � N0.35043 v a � SCALE 1" = 20' JUNE 13, 2016 THE GROUND AS SHOWN. °ks FcrSTEa� • NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION (0l(3 /� weal 14 BROWN STREET — SALEM, MA DATE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 978-744-4800 #4256 �� I i PROPOSAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR THE ADDITION RENOVATION TO .THE ROBERTS RESIDENCE 2 ROSEDALE AVE SALEM, MA Ar hit is 59 Atlantic Ave,Martlehead,MA 781-631-7299 JUNE IS, 2016 LIST OF DRAWINGS EXISTING PROPOSED DB EXISTING BASEMENT PLAN AB PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN DI EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN Al PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN D2 EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN A2 PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION D3 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION A3 PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION D9 EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION A9 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION D5 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION AS PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION D6 EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION I ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS ---------- ---------------------------------------------- o DECK ABOVE O OI t , t ` 7 BULKHEAD tt� I.I i t Of 4 ;f I ;t , { — ;d t GARAGE SLAG ABOVE 'E .� �t trtt la,♦ FpArPI7R - --__ AUD ---------------------------- ----------------------------- — ------------------------------------------- . i 7 ply, s I - _ is EXISTING GARAGE BASEMENT TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY ___ STORAGE SIIfi+fROOM A50 VE r u Lu Lu ;b --ff J L- ----------------- ---------------------------------------' `------------------------------------------- EXISTING BASEMENT PLAN EXISTING SUNROOM TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY SCALE; 3/16° = 1'-0° i (SHOWN SHADED) NORTH ROBERTS RESIDENCE oNW3 o0 DATE: DRAWING: im ADDITION t �� �QQ� 0� JUNE I5, 2016 EXISTING WAU*& �mwadMAMW 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA RENOVATION �a pp n ��' BASEMENTD E3 781-6347299 - ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 &IIKHEAD [5, 3, DECK ABOVE w' O Oj BULKHEAD R T R ER ' NEW BASEMENT1p �S „PEd STORAGE a COT NEW - i_ ------------------I ACCESS NOTE'. ---------------------------- --------------------- ------ SUNROOM __ , ABOVE — I 22 8' FINISHED BASEMENT --- ---- cBAWL SPACE ? CUT NEW ACCESS HOLE A, UNFINISHED BASEMENT UP � d Q V g __________ _ `r. PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 3/16” = I'-O" NORTH ® DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION ������ o0F JUNE 15, 2016 PROPOSED �AI11wctS 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA RENOVATION 6 6 BASEMENT AOlM QppCQ�� PLANA13 781-631-7299 -"2016 HND ARCHITECTS DECK BULKHEAO EXISTING SUNROOM TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY (SHOWN SHADED) o OI W/C GARAGE: KITCHEN f tk k 1 t" 1 t 3 I i k SLAB i, ___N__ } PAVERS --- ---- t ____ 5L#NRZ7(JM LIVING ROOM +-12'-3' EXISTING GARAGE / -_ HALL BE REMOVED DINING ROOM IN IT'S ENTIRETY - UP EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 8'-I I/2' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" vU NORTH ® ROBERTS RESIDENCE OHM BOARD DATE: DRAWING: Ar hit cts ADDITION E � o0� JUNE 15, 2016 EXISTING FIRST 69MwftA�MffN&e4MA0lW 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA RENOVATION APPEALS°- Lc� FLOOR PLAN DI 781-671-7299 ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS BULK HEAD DECK BULKHEAD LIVING AREA n W/C KITCHEN f - N --- ---- LIVING ROOM SUNROOM_ HALL DINING ROOM UP PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/W' = 1'-0" vU NORTH DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION E ZoM s BOARD (OF JUNE 15, 2016 PIRSPOSED Ar hit cts RENOVATION APFFAW FLOOR PLAN ssnflvrocAMVmbWdMA01M 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, .MA Al 781-631-7299 ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS r t 1I I ] l : 1 I I I tI 1 ( :— _ —_— — EXISTING SUNROOM — , TO BE REMOVED I` IN IT'S ENTIRETY l : F—ROOF TO REMAIN 7 Jk J GARAGE''t ,MUDROOM BEL©w J 1 1- JJ MASTER CLOSET BATHROOM 1 ' IJ kl BEDROOM 3 Ik 1 _ J 1 DN---- - ------- J I I - - — - � ------------ LZ . ;4HALL k ---- ------- ------------ ------------ EXISTING _--__-_______EXISTING GARAGE MASTER BEDROOM I I TO BE REMOVED 5UNtROOM BaroW: 1 IN IT'S ENTIRETY J _______ BEDROOM 2 J ---- ----- J UP I HALL —' "" "" ""'� _. _ EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" NORTH DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION t BOHM BOMB DIF JUNE 15, 2016 EXISTING Ar hit cts RENOVATIONSECOND 59AftftAv MwW8he4MA01W 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA �° pp -° �� PL lei-671-7299 PLAN N ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS r.- -= T.O. RIDGE _ ___ _ _ ___ ___ __ T: __ —_ -- -- _-- _-- ------------- EXISTING ASPHALT —__= r. ROOFING --_ - -__ -- ATTIC FLOOR -- - -- -- - -- -- -- - SECOND FLOOR CLG. i la EXISTING ALUMINUM ^ SIDING SECOND FLOOR _h FIRST FLOOR CI-Ga hY f I _ = s ;. _:-._ ,, , , ..a..*s: —FIRST FLOOR —. _ ---.- - -•`Y, BASEMENT CLG. T:.s. > —. —.—h APPROX. GRADE EXISTING GARAGE TO EXISTING SUNROOMJ BE REMOVED IN IT'S TO BE REMOVED ENTIRETY IN IT'S ENTIRETY EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION c ZoMn BOMB DIF JUNE .5, 2oi6 EXISTING FRONT Ar hlt CtS RENOVATION ELEVATION 6e,wwftA, ,MwWehe Kk0lW 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA D 3 781-631-7299 ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS EXISTING ASPHALT ROOFING T.O. MAIN RIDGE --- --- -------- -------- ---- -------- ---- s --------------- NEW ASPHALT --- --- -- - - --- --- --- -- --- -_ _ _ - ROOFING TO MATCH --- --- -- --- --- --- -- --- _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ EXISTING - ---------- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- ------------------------------------ T.O. NEW RIDGE I NMI 9 I7 ------.—.— ----- HIT -- ` 12 ------- - 03.25 ------------ ------------ ----------- - --- NFIRST FLR. CLG ------ -------------------EW. ----- in NEW FIRST FLOOR Y ADDITION BSnNT CLG. _�.— +-22_9• NEW HARD NEW ADDITION EXISTING ALUMINUM NEW ADDITION CLAPBOARD SIDING t SIDING 4 TRIM PVC TRIM PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/1C = 1'-0" D DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION t Z0RHO MAW (OF JUNE 15, 2016 PROPOSED A ^ Ar hit cts RENOVATION FRENA GJ ssnn�NLaaRlnmsu 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA °�pp �� ELEVATION 781-631-7299 Q2016 HND ARCHITECTS s:- T.O. RIDGE 0 ATTIC FLOOR SECOND,FLOOR. CLG_. S th SECOND FLOOR _ s:z r _ FIRST FLOOR _ BASEMENT LG.C- APPROX. GRADE +-20'-8" I EXISTING GARAGE TO----/ BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION SCALE. 3/16" = 1'-0" DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION t ZoHoaO OMB of JUNE 15, 2016 EXISTING Ar hit ctsLEFT 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA RENOVATION pppCpL�� ELEVATION Dl- 59AllaticA�e,Madehead M401875 - 784 fi31-7299 2016 HND ARCHITECTS T.O. MAIN RIDGE 12 + EXIST. ATTIC FLOOR ---------- EXIST. SCND. FLR. CLG. T.O. NEW RIDGE ---------- ------------ --------- ------------------ - - -- -- -- - ------- -- --- --- -- ------------- -- ------------ - - ------ - ----- ------------------ , m -------------------- --------------------------- - --------------- EXIST. SECOND FLOOR ———————————————— EX ST. FIRST FLOOR CLG. 4 in T NEW FIRST FLOOR_,—,—, EXIST, FIRST FLOOR.— ADDITION 35NNT CLG._ EXIST. BASEMENT CLG.,_ APPROX. GRADE NEW ADDITION PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION 4 ZOHM BOARD OF JUNE 15, 2016 PROPOSED Ar hit cts RENOVATION APPEALB LEFT 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA ELEVATION A3 ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS Y.r ----------- —__ ___ ___ ___ ____ _______ ------------------------------------------ --- ----------- -__ -__ -__ --------------- ----- ----------------------------- -------------- _ _ ATTIC FLOOR - - _ - - -- -- -- -- SECOND FLOOR CLG.on m . Hul - - - - - - - r SECOND FLOOR ----------- FIRST FLOOR CLG_ h _ ®® 3 .. 04,FFF�- - S FIRST FLOOR 1_ r y BE REMOVED IN IT'S _BASEMENT CLG_._� EXISTING GARAGE TO EXISTING SUNROOM ENTIRETY TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY EXISTING REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION t MOMS OMB of JUNE 15, 2016 EXISTING Ar hit CtS RENOVATIONe REAR DS 69Ador&Am MwbWhead MA0f8N6 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA KIPF ° LS ELEVATION 781-631-7299 02016 HND ARCHITECTS T.O. MAIN RIDGE —' -:------ ------------- ------------- ———— ———— --------------------- --- -------- ---- ----- T.O. NEW RIDGE o Zn - ------ + g I ---------------- --------- . ----------------------- NEW FIRST FLR. CLG� in ION I I HEW FIRST fL00R_ ADDITION nHNT.Cl-G.. APPROX. GRADE NEW SUNROOM NEW ADDITION PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" 1'-0" DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION E MoMme BOMB (OF JUNE 15, 2016 PROPOSED REAAr hit CtS RENOVATION Qpp[ Q1�S�' ELEVATION sen�awanwmau 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA Al- 781-631-7299 ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS T.O. RIDGE ATTIC FLOOR _ - _- . SECOND FLOOR .CLG_ -�- - - - (END OF GARAGE BEYOND) - -` EXISTING GARAGE TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY _SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR CLG_ -- - _ FIRST FLOOR,_ BASEMENT CLG. APPROX. GRADE EXISTING SUNROOM- TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0 DATE: DRAWING: ROBERTS RESIDENCE ADDITION c zom0m BOMB Ori JUNE 15, 2016 EXISTINGRIGHT / Ar hit cts RENOVATION ppp[ q�� E EVATION /- 59A1bEcAv MmWd..tMA01915 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA JJJJ 1100 781-631-7299 ©2016 HND ARCHITECTS T.O. MAIN RIDGE — -- -- -- -- - _ -- -_--_ EXIST..ATTIC FLOOR EXIST_5CND. FLR_CLG. ® _ _ ® -- ---- T.O. NEW RIDGE n --------------- ------------ ------------------- EXIST. '- --.-. --.-. .--. --.- - ---- _EXIST. SECONDFLOOR_ —_—___ —__ ___ ___ _ ____ — — • � EXIST. FIRST FLOOR CLG. - _ ---- L _ _ EXIST FIRST FLOOR EXIST. EASEMENT CLG. APPROX. GRADE +-21'-2° NEW SUNROOM PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ROBERTS RESIDENCE DATE: DRAWING: jAr "hitcts RENOVATION RADDITION E �O�nlOa� �OOG°QG3DD OOG� JUNE 15, 2016 RIGHT IGHT s9a�A�wadnwmals 2 ROSEDALE AVENUE SALEM, MA �° p°p�-°-° �� ELEVATIONAS- 781-631-7299 "4A1► r v �.§.�. •a � �l - L� \� 0. akBtr'+ `i s�;��yPA'ct�4..w t, Vi�!' �` �lC .�a^��QQ� r � �. �_ • ` `i•=leu c.@XPi �*{r��;.+.�',`►iFr'N��:..�y. .a _ �j:. 4 Fa a .tjtYt Y�rp. .\2Pf �� �. �d�ea "" "mak. x \ 5��� ..� �#� `.'�•.I , {� ..�- :�3'����i�1..•��<3y�`` 1�`� ��� ���, jl Y�,t� .�{li � 1 y,Sr1, �t' •�^j�f. � �% y'� .s:jz ��,�a�a ��r�` aip�R ' j,,:9� r7n ° ti''\.Sy\�f �� s • s, N,'M� kna f,a�_T�`1,, ae, , v"`°d= n - � ��"��jpjpP�� •3u _ "~"error. , � � a i i i f ' • 1 . i gg 'tiii � � 41�17 ' V�gw�O��� ,f �,� 2..PFFry � 91YA �1♦a f. ®. ,,� t � I ' � s V 9 i 'Al ' t ' r' p T�Sf. .yet n . 1 lip a� Y • . I � I �Rm. � �Q t� �F� . � �"' ti (9 � al" tly •'���1'S 9/Y .l 1� ggN�1P'•'\'Ca �S. a 'k��x k k tom/ tide tq '-t?I<� a 1�7: y r^ i ��. kA�p�y���e�k�•/� ��t) '1�� ..�. �1 �`ke It � �+�,�i+r��Pi' i �f f�'p a�� �+ WAlp, '��i..�l _ HA2.ra$,� i. ♦R .i � � � � I r "A • • I •I �i ff�v .t 1 � � e A i x ��}iA'y� ,tea!`.�ji �p I -✓s���.y.sy • rte, i a r p x'a "; p • r .. MA , t rx.- et h � • � � 44 YS' ) Ma t + 5 }J . . - .. • .. . , , . . • •.1 ON 't e F . �„•. ; syr >._ -•-� ICI i; r Photo 19: 2 Sunset Road Photo 20: 2A Sunset Road TINTI, QUINN, GROVER & FREY, P.C. 27 CONGRESS STREET,SUITE 414 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 WILLIAM J.TINTI tinti@tintilaw.com WILLIAM B.ARDIFF(1965,1995) WILLIAM F.QUINN TELEPHONE 8 42948 MARCIA MULFORD CINI WitliamFQuinn@aol.com (978)745,8065 • (97 )74 . OF COUNSEL SCOTT M.GROVER TELECOPIER JOHN D.KEENAN smgrover@tintilaw.com (978)7453369 OF COUNSEL MARC P.FREY www.tintilaw.com JERALD A.PARISELLA mpfrcy@tintilaw.com OF COUNSEL JONATHAN M.OFILOS jofilos@tintilaw.com THOMAS J.HOGAN tjhogan@tintilaw.com MARCY D.HAUBER mbauber@tintilaw.com CHRISTINA M.MIHOS cmihos@tintilaw.com May 18, 2016 Erin Schaeffer Staff Planner,City of Salem Department of Planning& Community Development 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 i Re: 2 Rosedale Avenue, Salem Dear Ms. Schaeffer, I am writing on behalf of Normand and Margaret Roberts to request a continuance of the public hearing with respect to the petition affecting the above referenced property to the next meeting of the Board of Appeals on June 15, 2016. Very truly yours, S . rover; Esq.