15-17 READ STREET - ZBA ,'15-17 Read St. R-2 Iwo M
Richard DeForrest
I
1
n
r--
(r �lC�Orll. /4c I N TO 6 k %ttt.b IN % T
�Cr//o/ng 3rsP�xfo/
SGIi.», /ass. SEP 7 216 PH 'IILI
RECEIVED
r �Q I
_C(IITY OF SALEEM,K4SS.
5 "- C jNIT
Y /,R�b3 nJt� (��"Yi I�/Pd L"'FcG3 �4G•,OPC6 ��°� 1��� �
/f we /a-L/G led'Gd eC J3 �
C3 0 t C ro/4 (p7� S o t? CY✓P � /! E a �cvQ? cv� (�! o v G
4P !/J tel �nc� ce Ge. 7 /'ea am /�"f�E S r�� 4rL (rJ /�
f/� liou, n xsn ,0sAPpC'q® vLIZc
Such G C /7�0 � �� cL+
<�o41P uS ]" 0 can 5 ?pile¢ ' & /6 4.+( d��f
bks /"d Par/n� 4, ov ! s6e o , 6
[yy {
� anrr-y bar - GowS �avp �nGoP/'� Dy �✓Ulyl t�G-�(0�7 „
IAle Coe7 CIO SJ
0-0 s e w v,/ti
5-,Lp 6 r(h i 7`1Ig.t>e }o✓
Nt o.vu�� be cv•�++NraEa9C�+�
t2+ 844
iboo
m t:
7-e b
L
'� �I G'dt3 ,Q R. I�AI�'�ISW��II I:J c�J'U�lic�e
ENGINEERS
CONSTRUCTION
RS, CTION MANAGERS
w
�2 Q1itU of �$nlem, tS55ttt�It52#l�8
` Pourb of
(4uwa4 I1RY -8 P 2 '4 i
'�I)IIAS'N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD DEFORREU(FOR _
VARIANCE FOR 15-17 READ ST. , SALEM (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held on April 25, 1984 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman, Messrs. , Hopper, Strout and Associate
Members Bencal and LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A
Petition is requesting a Variance to allow him to rebuild a four unit apartment
building that was consumed by fire and to convert it to a four unit condominium
in this R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
-c desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
- -.-desirable
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after considering the evidence presented at the hearing and
after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition or support for petitioner's plan;
2. Previous use was as a four family dwelling and it did not detract
from the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of facts, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land involved and which are not generally affecting affecting other
lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OFrRICHARD DEFORREST FOR
/ A VARIANCE FOR 15-17 READ ST. , SALE14
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously in favor or granting the
Variance to allow construction of a four unit condominium building under the
following terms and conditions:
1 . Any lights must be on the perimeter facing inward and away from
residences;
2. There must be a solid fence or solid bushes to prevent lights in parking
area from shining onto neighbors property;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy for each unit must be obtained.
ames B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
f
n �
-1 A
t!Y< T
Dc7 3 -n
"71 (V
M
PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS_
USSR:E4 3'2, W!D SHALL RE ^:ED '+-:. H?1J 20 DAYS AFTER, THE DATE OF FILIN".
CF THS 1N THE OFF!CE OF Tr._ CITY CLERK.
P� SX:T TO 4:!•.SS. LE ".° 'A..S. 't!AP;ER -M, SEC';,N 11, THE VA^IA":CE OR SPEC: L FE?':T
SNALL _ rr i Ui IL A COPY OF THI5❑.,.,.I'.9. Z d4;a3 THE CERT-
Tl:t;:CI7 IF THE UTY aER,. (LA, 2J OAJ'S NO APPEAL HAS u.-Li FILED.
03 IFU. IF SULI; FN APPEAL HAS KEN P.E. ";H ,i IT MS GE N DIa:iSSEU OR OEi;IED IS
RECLSD`_J IA THE SGUiH ESSEX REGISTRY O' C=EDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE P:A;fE OF THE OWNER OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED ARID NOTED ON THE OV: T_R'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
3 � ,
Z DO Ga�SETTS d��
l� "s wow m?
ILI
1
� �\ Q� .z c •8�
esy(l Yt O N \ M woo
AV
M \\
� o ,
cw —�
� � h
Ql) F
v
� v
C
•w Q
I ATio
<
' � � -=fit=DRoar•� (F={ � �" .
x
FAr1rt-N
Roc), � . -4x E
e
-4n
F/ToPOSEP R,9SE1-1ENT PLAN ' SECOND F-L oo g PLRN
"c--- — —T 4 x -
KrrcHQN
r ♦'Ot f c
00
JLOTM
}
•
-
' r T-t i .1 1 11. -
K
- - ._. ..
iD TJ _
i� I' I _I' � 1_ILII - I�
/7/`�. �� / v /tip /�/�% ��. /��..' . /% `+,.. i / / \. / %/ r'/ \{._ '..� 1 U[� '
NIT5
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS for R. DE-FoRRc--sr
PROPOSED �LEVAT7oN /5- 7 � )9EAD ST - S� LEPl
R. L• 7"7�1c n o! T /95500, Fno)Lneers
MAILH(yrr � 57 SY L. V/aN $T Co nstrocfron Managers
No.2&:55 .
o'o, g DraNdr_ms, 77 ,95so
'777 - 3G3 !
ti ' F-L c o R P L /,::? iv 5 E C E V/-) Ti 0 V