Loading...
20 RAYMOND ROAD - ZBA 20 Raymond Road R-1 Gerard & Patricia - Salvucci r W o : rFln � I U rf A �u r n '1 r h of Snlera, assarhusQ#ts �. � - / Pourb of �Ayyeal 3(y���� *83 DEC 19 P3 01 _ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GERARD AND PATRICIA SALVUCCI FOR A VARIANCE FOR 20 RAYMOND ROAD, SALEM CITY f, --.,..;, - _ A hearing on this petition was held November 30, 1983 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charms, Hopper, Luzinski and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abv.tters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners request a variance from density requirements in order to construct an addition on the premises in this R-1 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances existing which especially affect the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, and structures in the same district; b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and c. Desirable relief may be 'granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purposes of the Ordinance. The Board of, Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings for fact: 1 . No opposition to the plan was raised by neighbors; 2. The rear of house exit area has deteriorated to the point where it is or may soon become a safety hazard; 3. Without the requested Variance, the necessary repair and new egress from the rear would have to be done in such a way as to be very-expensive; 4. The above situation is unique to the premises. On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Literal enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would create a substantial financial hardship on petitioners; 2. The above descrihed special conditions which affect the lot. are unique to the lot and do not affect the district generally; PETITION OF GERARD AND PATRICIA SALVUCCI FOR A VARIANCE FOR 20 RAYMOND ROAD 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously to grant petitioner's request to allow them to expand or alter the premises as described in the plan submitted_ by petitioners to the Board. W c: Scott E. Charnas, Acting Secretary ;! o V< M F— • U , A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPSdL F:'.Oi: Fa.S Ya GI.I.":, ?.:i., SHALL EE %JE PU`3S:ANT TO SECTICY 1-7 ^_F -_.L ... CENMAL LAX.'., Li,.,:'i hii JS. Ai!D SHALL ".E F:L_D VNTHIN 20 CAYS AFTER. lac i,F T;1;3 Lc„S4:,: !A EFIE 0,FI:;E OF ThE CITY CLEI;X. - _ P'J:'S.r.:vl !L S. I,�1 1i,e'a, CHAP ECR 36S. S"1;�13:1 11. T i I E V;:^.:?.h::° S3ALL N.;: T..;:E EFFLCT G!:T!L A C•CP! OF THE:,Ei1S: —I OF T..= LhY CI"Cc; THAT ZO DAYS PAVE EL.'.FSEO f::'7 - ,'T 5:: ! HA BEE,! IL. .. IT 1 .. _ ! ., - ..�...:J:O •1:1 1dE S'.:U Fit ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS WID Ir:D;cD OI!!Yc;1 13E i:::r:_ "X XE;U0. OR 13 RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OW :ER'S CERTIFICATE OF TULE. BOARD OF APPEAL