15 PUTNAM STREET - ZBA 15 PUTNAM STREET R-2
Isilda M. Silva - - —�
-Granted 11/17/82
f
1�
i
�,
w�.� V
y
\1
1
}. • /i
n
t
N ( {q r
C"1 1 c•
CITY
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ISILDA M. SILVA FOR A SPECIAL 5 ; .._ . .,..
PERMIT FOR 15 PUTNAM STREET
A hearing on this Petition was held on November 17, 1982 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. LaBrecque, Hopper, Feeherry and
Associate Member Lusinski. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter,_4.Oa.=
The Petitioner has requested a Special Permit to extend the existing nonconforming struc-
ture by constructing an addition on the rear of the property. The property is within
an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a
Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in
this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance
with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F
and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, exten-
sion or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or
expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than
the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by
the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the
grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and wel-
fare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board, after considering the evidence at the hearing on this ::.3tter, makes the
following findings of fart:
1. The proposed addition was unopposed by any neighbors.
2. The proposed addition will have a negligible impact on the area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Board of Appeals finds (i) that the proposed addition to the property will
not be substantially more detrimental than the existing structure to the neighborhood,
(ii) that the proposed addition to the property will promote the public health,
safety, convenience, and welfare, and (iii) that the proposed addition to the property
is in harmony with the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board unanimously
approved the granting of a Special Permit to the Petitioner.
4 ISION ON THE PETITION OF
VILDA M. SILVA FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR 15 PUTNAM STREET
Page 2
November 17, 1982
1. All work shall be in accordance with plans to be submitted to Building
Inspector for his approval.
2. A Certificate of'Us e--'and' -Occupancy
shall
'-6bt i6 -fo'
be ai r r us Ing—bfg=addl t 16rf.--
Anthony M. -7 lreherpy
APFE,'jL THIS IF A17, SitALL BE MADE PUZ-,IjA.!!T TO SEW,-1 17 OF THE MASS
At:,) K FM'(D 20 DAY' A'—, :i T.iE DA11- LiC HL11:3
(IF ,::S THE (jFfIE 0,r ME C;7( CU-YS.
P .P.' is ;liESS. 903. F-CTWI 11, THE VAN;�N— rp.
S.'ALL N� T UHF , UNMIL A CX'l OF WE
OF 74E CITY CLERX MU 20 VMS HAVE ELAPiD AM! NO AOKU F,,S C,.;I
UP I- SOCH AN f.PKAL W6 FILE. THAII if HAS CZEN CIS'�IiS,"j OR 0'- 0 6
RcuOR-,ELI ,Vi TIIE SO P. ESSEN RE"ISTRY OF DEEDS MIT) INDEXED UNDFP, TI!E ;!P.,E UF
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND 1`10T10 011 THE MUM'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
•
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
3 MORTGAGE SURVEY PLAN
r iq A
1 k
f
I
f i
I ;
I I
I i
t LOT A
`
QL 1\l..Eta V 1 / t
LU � LOT f>
d i ; �
I �•
f ,
f . r
72
r ,
1_ Sr Qy Nf 1f i w/1
1 AereDy tify that tfi�ptwaless shown on this plan is not SetAecks shown 1 ItarsDy certify That the dwaUfrg�s)on this plan Isl
a spproalrtulsly a —tUrspn and that It com Ile
located within a flood Uaaard area as shown on Department on this plan are e'
H.u.D. Fedeisl lnswwk"` stranon Maps• for the determine- hasnktp laws the rownhcny o�_.�1&�A;
C I vi.i• � ..� ;J* „ What oonstrupled. 1 l ��
Community lti w .w "
25 IO:: A DEL. of "On of:onina
s,Ap,'j'r�'16 requiremonts Registered Land Surveyor
IdepAHcatlon tom' +�- 1 I onilt
I/ I _.County
9y , •I Deed Reference
Re�ahrod Pro Cfpa�L ional Enainser h1�i CNaEL
� & Book�'L— cr i
RObERT M. ASSOCIATES, C. stele: L1 �_
3L IN s ]A']
CIVIL ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS wan Reference
4/d belljl R.IOIY[ly cuss O1�f0• (i�')�2"O10 data: ?.7Q.Ji t 6J _pian_' _ t
I
I
,r
4 � 1
I
I I I
+
I
f t
`
J a
f � w
f t ,
1.
A
e 4 .•`j
n +- 1