Loading...
8 PURCHASE STREET - ZBA D j 8 PURCHASE STREET R-1 5 �� v ��� '� I � .. _ Legal Notice CITY OF SALEM f BOARD OF APPEAL 745.9595 Ext 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the petition sub- mitted by CHRISTOPHER CRUCIANI j requesting a Variance from side and rear setbacks to construct a 14'x 18' single story addition for the property located at 8 PURCHASE STREET,R-. Said hearing to be held on WEDNES- DAY,November 17,2004 at 6:30 P.M, {I 120 Washington Street,3RD FLOOR, ROOM 313. Nina Cohen Chairman (11/4,10) I Legal Is CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR m r� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Z C7 OT STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 CID MAYOR N FAX: 978-740-9846 3> t mY' D r�3 y DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHRISTOPHER CRUCIANI REQUESTING Aq, VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 PURCHASE STREET R-1 A hearing on this petition was held on November 17, 2004 with the following Board Members present; Nina Cohen Chairman, Bonnie Belair, Richard Dionne, Edward Moriarty and Nicholas Helides. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from side and rear setbacks to construct a 14 x 18 single story addition for the property at 8 Purchase Street located in an R-1 zone. The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plane, makes the following findings of fact: I. Petitioner, owner of the property is requesting relief in the form of a Variance from side and rear setbacks to construct an addition. 2. The Variance for the side line would be 8 feet instead of the required 10 feet and the rear yard setback would be 11 feet instead of the required 30 feet. 3. Plans were submitted showing the proposed addition. 4. There was no opposition to this petition. C CD MCD DECISION OF THE PETITION OF CHRISTOPHER CRUCIANI REQUESTINQ A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 PURCHASE STREET R7! ai page two D w- Ns— On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented the Board of Appeals finds as follows; o� 1. Special conditions exist when especially affect the subject property but not he District. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5 in favor and 0 in opposition to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state stature, ordinance, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted November 17, 2004 �CY� Bonnie Belair CSCE, Board of Appeal DECISION OF THE PETITION OF CHRISTOPHER CRUCIANI REQUESTING o VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 PURCHASE STREET R-1,4 xu page three Q D A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED wrM THE PLANNING BOA$ AND THE CITY CLERK w Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,or that, if such appeal has been Oiled, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT,ST., BEVERLY MA -LOCATION-s- - _...!fi. NtR..,-- - -- ES. SCALE : I�� 2-7-0 FT. DATE :_.• • Z •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an Y ' ••• instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for REFERENCE �K. / 20$9 �G 2S� .......... mortgage inspection purposes only. .This survey is based on survey marks of others. ......... .. . .. .. ..... .... ...... . ....... •Bushes, shrubs,fences and tree lines do not To .IV EW CLS.%GYV G1�T Coe necessarily indicate property lines. M"' P..... ..... •In my professional opinion the building(s)are not located The location of the buildings)as shown,either complied with the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. local zoning set backs at the time of construction or is exempt •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less,an instrument survey from violation enforcement action under Mass. G.L.Title VII is recommended to determine prop. lines. Chapter 40A Section 7. •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey. e o IY2 � - —� o _ _ Z(�' � 93.00 pURcl I sl,:!- s �,p,,N O: kf'r s F ROBERT v .TAMES SonROs H l NO.260Ba