104 PROCTOR STREET - ZBA 104 Proctor St. R-2
Mike & Stanley*
- - - - - • -- -
0
S
`I-n
VJ
i
Cita of "Salem, �ttssachusetts
i
3r
;r' F Poarb of '4peal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MIKE KANTOROSINSKI (PETITIONER)
STANLEY KANTOROSINSKI (OWNER) FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR
1b4 PROCTOR ST. , SALEM
Nov 20 II is 4M '8S
A hearing on this petition was held November 6, 1985 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Charnael Muthier, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notic#jspf the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening NewsUiTrY ecor�auiit 'WY4-1
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the first floor or the premises
to be used as a doctors office in this R-2 district.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and condit9ons
set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement, or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans of the property, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was vigorous opposition presented tot he petitioners
plan by neighbors and others;
2. The character of the neighborhood is residential;
3. Allowing the relief requested would tend to change the character
of the neighborhood to a more commercial use;
4. The premises is located at a dangerous and highly traveled intersection;
5. Allowing the relief requested would dangerously increase the traffic
there.
One the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed use will not be in harmony with the district;
2. The relief requested cannot be be granted without substantial
detriment to public good or without substantially derogating from
intent and purpose of the ordinance.
J• DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MIKE KANTOROSINSKI (PETITIONER) ,
STANLEY KANTOROSINSKI (OWNER) FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR
104 PROCTOR ST. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 against granting the
Special Permit requested.
SPECIAL PERMIT DENIED /
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
a fEAi .�. ';':E!"; ZO DAPS AFFE' THE D',TE OF FILCiS
r THIS DECISIOit, I"r A";Y, SHALL RE F.S.,^.DE PURS'JA^:T TO SECTI^ti 17 OF THE I'..ASS.
CEiEFId LAnS. Ch:AP:EL CLERK.
OF *Hlc =C'S,`Nr:; 11. THE it
f S' O° �H. . h r..:J.
r_
12 Fi c 7. ii
L ul
� FrE6L
i` IF So., F ESSEX F,.; Oi CEty�
16 THE S_- c
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED A;:D GCI ED11ER'S.CERTIFIC�+iE 0"r iiiLE.
OIG The Oy��
BOARD OF APPEAL
`� '� it i� IIl Iun lii J�I'I VIII liu ,
111111 =IIIIIIIIIII�ollllllllllll•• —
' ElFi
Am
�` y � � ' I llli!111111��,'i'�II11i�11 Illllllillh it '
Illldh�ll�llllll�dl II Ill�d"Illill '
t
yA
If I
I �
� 4 e
-
i I
ti
r
J
_ w P
.y T a r
This'paper manufactured This paper marfufaactured Thisi
by Kodak by Kodak.
•L 85 y, '� 1 OMA JUL 85 s, PMA k"
Q G f G L •"
Q c •'+ W Q -. •r.
a
_ '
e
� _�
I 7 �'��"-
� ,:
�y.
i J ` f%s
� 7—(�±�
h T+j
�3'��i �
1 ����,z
i i,.. p � s, I '" j
� � I
1 r-- ��� �
� �-.
i � `:
` � I
I �9
IT I":rZ \'. b�
I
��� � I � ���� �, 1�
illll� � i . � 4 .
����IVI VIII VI �IIII�III> �
�:'.�
VIIIIII
Y�, �,I �����I�I—������������V 1.����������I�— �l
O C
r
••D
6
O r r
G G F 4
r .� 9 9
Ureds This paper manufactured 6,-This paper manufactured
a by Kodak < by Kodak
¢nvh JUL ss OMA ynM4. ornA
r n G �, •a
C C
PLAN OF LAND
IN
644 d-/L%.# /">-09SS
R.W. REID CE LYNNFIELDI MA. e
Sa9cs ice• 30, fJu6 iS i98s
N/F
G \/
t1r o�
goo' 30'
Z 3 Story _._.
r
n
C
�—
Norm;
My Y cerli{y that tha dweGin; is
as shown and cD :-
{crm;:d io the 9
«�>+ zomn laws
the 1! Z- __ CI v�• v
whenn eonstruc3ed.
O k�•.y+1�
I , hereby, certify to the best of my knowledge that the premises shown on this plan are
not located within a flood hazard area as delineated on the map of Community // ZsoiaZ-V
by the Department of Housing and .Urban Development , Federal Insurance Administration,
dated 3/is/77
Note: This plan was prepared from a tape survey and is intended for mortgage purposes
only. Offsets shown on, or scaled from this plan are approximate only, and should not be
used to determine property lines. BS-563
A., L, t7Pc Paae 073 Certificate Number