60 PROCTOR STREET - ZBA J
60 Proctor St. R-3
- -- - — - --- ----- Robert A. Cohn
�d..:
1
1
t
' M
1M1 5
f , 1
n
—1:p '
\J
4 Cgi#v of '$ttlem, ttsstttlluse##s
Pourb of eul
'or
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT A. COHN FOR A
VARIANCE FOR 60 PROCTOR STREET, SALEM
A hearing on this petition was held February 26, 1986M9d1R A 581K.1k
Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. encal, Charnas, Strout
and Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing wa to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly publi�Yff Lq tPPi4.�SEvening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chap er �OA.
Petitioner, owner of the premises, requests a Variance from any and all
LL u W density and setback requirements in order to construct a two car garage with
anapartmentabove in this R-3 district.
0 0 = o TPS Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
c w Bd�ird that:
C u C O
Q
w aV a ti w o m a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
I the land building or structure involved and which are not generally
W N W O 2 Q
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
j z x z o o < y b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
a '= w ,`_' � w volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and
c. .desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
w �
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. '
LLJ 0 c C 0
n C ,
of; w h w The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes
Q the following findings of fact:
b N Q
J4 2 r 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan;
2. The lot is virtually unusable without the requested variance.
5 = On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
: x o 1 . Special conditions exist which affect the lot in question and do
not generally affect the district;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would create a substantial
hardship on the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantially derogating
from the intent or purpose of the Ordinance and without substantial
detriment to the public good.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief
requested provided that a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTEDAl
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK.
,COX Tity of iTleltl, Aiasssar4usetts
a (offirr of the (fi#n (Emtllrit
hlitg Mall
�j9faUrtN6 W��Y WARD COUNCILLORS
GEORGE P. MCCABE 1986
COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE PRESIDENT
1988 GEORGE A. NOWAK
JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO KEVIN R. HARVEY
ROB'DRT E. GAUTHIER CITY CLERK VINCENT J. FURFARO
FRANCES J. GRACE LEONARD F. O'LEARY
NEIL J. HARRINGTON JEAN-GUY J. MARTINEAU
RICHARD E. SWINIUCH GEORGE P. MCCASE
JOHN R. NUTTING
February 26, 1986
Mr. James Hacker, Chairman
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Petition of Robert A. Cohn for a variance from any and all density
and setbacks in order to construct a two—car garage with an
apartment above at 60 Proctor Street (R-3) .
Dear Mr. Hacker:
I am writing to express my support for this proposal, which is
located in the Ward I represent.
The plan proposed is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood
and ample parking will be provided.
I hope that the Board will look favorably upon this petition.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
fl
Sincerely yours,
Leonard F. OILeary
Councillor. Ward Four
(IT
x Clitg of Salem,
Fire Department Xeaayuarters
ROBERT J. CROWLEY 48 :afgette *frert
ach of *alem, 4ftt. 01970
Date: Feb. 26, 1986
City of Salem RE : 60 Proctor Street
Board of Appeal Robert A, Cohn
One Salem Green
Salem, MA •01970
Sirs:
As a result of the notice received concerning th6 Board of Appeal hearing for
the above listed name and address, the Salem Fire- Department requests the
following items to be placed on record:
The Salem Fire Department object to the granting of a Variance for the above listed
property.
I
This property does not comply with the Massachusetts General Laws relative to the
installation of automatic smoke detectors.
i
spectfully,
Orman P. LaPointe
Fire Inspector
cc: Appellant
Building Inspector
File
Form #105
A
�o
M
N I-�
V�QQ� 6p ¢A � m
#Go �o X58
�T
rg6 Toe
{�L Acv .SHo w�M�
PROPOSED GA RA G E.
�`" OF �7/04ATEAP 47'
F�
ROBERT6'O
c JAME6 -
sor S A L E N7 j MA 6-5.
No. 2OD94
GISTt "=20' ,SEPT /-985
a�.iawo
lPrc1'cd frr caNN
- _ -. - - - _- - mac•,-_..-.�w." __ Y f.'�-:- -.0--
I •
i Ln
A4 ALr 4kwG�tS I --
{
s e \ V
7,7
AN
i
r —
14
IL
l itW40
i D
• � •__.. _ _.ter_ �- ++r � _ X1 _ •___. .., _._ __ .._.__.__.. _. .-. __-.- _. ___. ._. _--
, 1 {
,
_ .._ . .. ._. .� I
A 91-0a0 �}4f"L r�_�p)C j'�` Opt 1A�lqr-
l
- t
j ! R ta
{ _
G 1 i t I �---F-�{ I � i _ _- _ � I • it
I
L� I
i
i
{
I
�� {{ � U, {
S C a L t ►I4 n � !! 01 -a-3
iv
I
f
� f
}
3'
1
-L1LJL1.. _
6610
- I
FL4. Q
1 I !
I _ 1 •
d
�-441
17
yivl�
+ - � • l� 1 ---,
' f
i
!! 1
I
I � _
` 4
1 �
I
! 1 ,
I ;
r i
f "Y'
Ole
! MA#'Al
_ f