34 PROCTOR STREET - ZBA (2) Sh n Mich St. R-2
Shawn Michaud
P
C�
- I
Co.
f t Ctg of "�ttlrm, CI assadjuset l 17 fh rob
A.
Pourb of LApprnl
Os€fi" J F
��ouo-a Jtt�k:Ct
t. t'FC§
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF SHAWN MICHAUD FOR VARIANCE
AT 34 PROCTOR ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 27, 1988 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances to allow an existing
deck. Property is located in an R-2 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted withoutsubstantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition;
On the basis of the above finding of fact, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship
on the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment or
without derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of
the Ordinance.
�I
✓f. y
ON THE PETITION
OF SHAWN MICHAUD FOR VARIANCE
DECISION
AT 34 PROCTOR
ST. , SALEM
page two rant the relief
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-O> to B
requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The deck not be altered;
2, Building Permit be obtained.
GRANTED `
.�Jl
Peter sLrou, Me26 Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FRCM THIS DECISION. IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MAPS.
. ..Q ,I LA13. 805 A7:D SHALL 5E FIIE:, P;''H N 29 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILIN4
,r }h,S SETS""' i% -HE 'FF,LE Ci THE CITY CLERK
, CCS, S: `I','i 11, THE VA?'P'!C[ CC ^T7r; -C C
H_ia'. 1'LL I.'. E EFFECT Li;T!L A CCF'i ",i 'HE JEC:S'-
it{Ai IF .°,. ., .', aP'r J,L f!'•, Fu E. n. I.
RECCi.OE 1 1;, THE $:.7TH ESSEE RE:ISTR, CF ..EEC: A40 :- !"" E CF THE CCd:C!;
OF RECORD GR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE,
BOARD OF APPEAL
i
M(ATGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION j / jyt M.i -t5, NOTES i
SCALE I LO FT DATE , _
__�o //;i 7 • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
F -
REFERENCE � 7'1Q� : z�/ ___________•___ an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
��' " - ' "-------' mortgage inspection purposes only.
, SE Sd . Z) is7,
• This survey is based on survey marks of
- • ---•-•-------• others.
To _ AS�cl?N__s/aVintC�S__1zliti.t<..... • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the not necessarily Indicate property lines.
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
• The building(s) are not located in the special
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the flood hazard zone,, as defined by H.U.D.
Gl?� (j r 5f}LEyV4 w erg con rutted.
23`Q�,H 0' 04ff9yG
'7 C
L j E T
DFCK 7-3bE5 IJo7
GD,MPL�/ �/r TH JO' No. 26C34
SE%3i9CK cC�Ji2�r�fEn�TFs F AA
LOT vQ,y
LOT 342-. s'o A oS
N
O
O
LOT 339
�- 47,00 ^�
13 _
L07340 �—r2-y� �� 0
� � A= 8,2Q0±SF, of
LOT 34Z
2%2STY
/�- woo p
NO --�4
4R7,0 0 i.
PROUTOR STREET