Loading...
15-19 PROCTOR STREET - ZBA 15-19 PROCTOR STREET ERNEST J. DELPERO r i %LAtu of 4�c fig' Aire pepartn,rnt �ienl,tnartrrs 7James �j_ �Irsnnm, 48 ?lnfnVr.ttr ,r trvct QIhist - ' . ttleny:!}flri. '019711 Date:' Sept. 23. 1981 " . Salem Board of Appeal Re: Ernest J. Delpero City of Salem, Massachusetts 15-19 Proctor Streets Salem One Salem Green Original Hearing 9/9/81 Salem, Ma. 01970 Sirss As a result of notice received concerninF the Board of Appeal hearing for the above listed name and address, the Salam -Fire Department, requests the following items to be placed on record. 1. As a result of furthur information received on this proposal., the Salem Fire Department requests that all prior approvals be voided. 2. The petitioner shall be required to resubmit the proposed plans to this office for furthur review. 3. It appears that the original plan did not have sufficient- clarity in detail to permit our consideration of access for emergency vehicles, especially with reference to the second structure. 4, It is our recommendation that this appeal NOT be granted until a furthur review of the plans are made by this office, and a subsequent latter provided with our opinions. P Respectfully submitted ,,, E' Captain David J. Goin . ccs Building Inspector Salem Fire Marshal file 411r, Ernest J. Delpero, 13 Plains Rd. Ipswich, Mass. (356-3244) Form # 105 Pof �clexrc, � M sttrE�u P# s dDffke of the (gi#ggqWf# APPEALS 71 3 � ,r F gag Pau sRft ¢ WARD COUNCILLORS JOSEPH M. CENf{J��j 191 1981 COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE - PRESIDENT".'P(`, q 39 pN 181 - GEORGE A. NOWAK .1981 JOSEPHINE R. FUSC91CCEI.,,p JOHN F. NESTOR, IN CITY CLERI�.f)'Y.O� SALEM,Mll�dt�p. JOSEPH M. CENTORINO - dN EMI ASS STEPHEN P. LOVELY FRANCES J. GRACE JOHN J. GIARDI ROBERT J. LE BLANC. JR. ROBERT E. HEALEY GEORGE F. MCCABE BRIAN T. O'KEEFE - JOHN R. NUTTING 4 September 23, 1981 Lt. George Jeffrey Police Traffic Police Department Salem, M 01970 Dear Lt. Jeffrey: A pe mit has been applied for at the Board of Appeals to construct 10 Condo Units at 15-19 Proctor Street. Access will be one (1) 30 foot drive directly after the Thomas Brophy residence at #25 Proctor Street. Serious concern was shown at the.public hearing on September 9, 1981 by the nearby residents relative to the safety aspect of the proposed exit/ entrance. Could you kindly view the site and send me your written comments on the matter before October 6. Sincerely, FRANCES J. GRACE ODMICILTAR %WD FOUR FJG/deb Y COPY: Board of Appeal 2.l11" i; ��• � � �•1 j a fifi rr �..;+ i�` ��`� ,C S' t `1 �1�� .4� l BOARD O" S ' x Of of Ielu An6achuutts ,1 g o�� SEP B 4 19a F t8 LTe Llepartment �e quarters �amea 2T. rsaman 48 ?:afagette ,%eet _ RECEIVED CITY "f CITY OF,5ALEM,MASS: I$alem, AL II197II Date: Sept. 8, 19$1 Salem Board of Appeal Re: Ernest J. Delpero City of Salem, Massachusetts 15-19 Proctor Street; Salem One Salem Green Hearing Date: Sept. 9, 1981 Salem, Ma. 01970 Sirs: As a result of notice received concerning the Board of Appeal hearing for the above listed name and address, the Salem Fire Department, requests the following items to be placed on. record. 1. Plans reviewed for this,.project, include additional post-hydrants fire department connection; standpipe in common stairway, smoke .- (^ detectors per Chapter 1¢$, and Mass. State, Building Code and are- subject to final stamped approval before constrution begins 2. Adequate parking is recommended per curt!ent zoning codes. 3 . A final inspection is required .prior to this office signing the Certificate of Occupancy. Respectfully submitted Captain David J. Go in cc : Building Inspector Salem Fire Marshal file Form r 105 DATE OF HEARING SEPTEMBER 9. 1981 PETITIONER ERNEST DELPERO LOCATION 15-19 PROCTOR STREET MOTION: TO GRANT SECONDED TO DENY SECONDED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW e SECONDED_;: rp G ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW ANTHONY FEEHERRY JAMES HACKER / DOUGLAS HOPPER v ARTHUR LA BRECQUE JOSEPH PIEMONTE ASSOCIATE MEMBERS EDWARD LUZINSKI JEAN-GUY MARTINEAU DISCUSSION & CONDITIONS: 760 7hQ (517) 744-4799 IDJEAL FINISHING CO, Contract Finishers QUALITY FINISHING ON ALL TYPES OF LEATHER - - 55-61 Boston Street 41 Salem. Mass. 01970 September '9 , 1981 City of Salem Board of Appeals One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Attention : . Anthony M. Feeherry, Secretary Re : Petition of David Warner for . Special Permit for Erection of Condominiums on Proctor Street in Salem Dear Mr . Feeherry : Please be advised that the Ideal Finishing Company, a Massachusetts Business Corporation with an usual place of business at 55-61 Boston Street , Salem, Massachusetts 01970 , wishes to place itself in opposition to the allowance of a Special Permit for the erection of condominiums on Proctor Street in Salem applied for by Ernest J. Delpero. (David Warner , owner) for the following .reasons : 1 . The blasting requisite to allow foundations and under- ground garages will have a deleterious effect on. the machinery and production schedules in our buildings . Our production lines consist in part of five (5) or six .(6) Peirlon strand conveyors which are stretched strands (120 in number) which carry our unfinished product through the various production lines . The setting off of explosives can cause these taut strands to contract and pull the machines and conveyors right out of the footings . The expense in breakdowns in the production lines and the possible injury to one employee will not be tolerated. 2 . Proctor Street is a one-waystreet running from Boston 9 Street Southerly and then Westerly along two (2) sides of the property for which the Special Permit is sought. The problem of ingress and egress with. ten (10) additional dwellings on or in the rear of Proctor Street would have an 'untoward effect on traffic and operation of fire apparatus in the event of a fire, or an ambulance in the event of an emergency. L f -2- There are presently three ( 3) businesses on Proctor Street which require parking by semi-trailer trucks during daylight business hours . The cabs , and. in some cases , the bodies of the trucks project into the street at loading or unloading periods and hamper the easy flow of traffic . The entrance to the pro- perty for which the variance is sought is on a one-way street and is surrounded by businesses on two sides as shown on the plan filed with the application . 3 . Our Company has recently been mandated by the Common- wealth of Massachusetts , Division of Environmental Quality Engineering to erect a stack to precipitate any smoke or fumes which ,are an essential by-product of our industry seventy-five ( 75) feet from the ground level of the street facing our property. The topo filed with the Petitioner' s application shows from forty (4'0) to fifty ( 50) feet above that and with a two and' a half (2;) story building , if erected on the property, would be in line with the top of the stack and the buildings , if erected, would receive any residue from the stack or other business ' chimneys in the neighborhood . We have spent literally thousands of dollars in the: past year and a half and untold hundreds of hours of our executive ' s time in order to bring this building up to and exceed- ing present pollution control standards and we are in no position to have this re-engineered to accommodate the whims of some deve toper who will disappear when the buildings are built and leave the unsuspective purchasers to wake up some day to the fact that they have purchased a condo in a settled business district that has existed for over one hundred (100) years . Our present main building dates back to 1914 and has consistently been used as a leather factory and leather finishing operation from that date to the present time . Certain executives of our company have purchased an adjacent lot and building for parking and future expansion purposes , and after an expenditure of that sum do not want or anticipate objec- tions from people who may purchase Condos that have not been built upon when our plans were initiated and subsequently put into being , 4 . The parking shown as underground parking on the sche- matic filed with the Application does not conform to the parking requirements set out under the applicable provisions of the zoning code of the Commonwealth .. 5 . There is only one method of ingress and egress for emergency traffic ( fire engines or ambulance) through a so-called visitor' s parking lot . The layout with the usual space allocated for each parking space and the sixteen (16) foot way dictated by the zoning code is not in conformity therewith . -3- 6 . The allocation of space to hot-top areas is going to increase the already impossible situation on Pope Street and Proctor Street, which has consistently flooded since the Salem Heights project was built and will leave this land no longer to absorb water which it has done for years in its natural state . 7 One corner of the back portion of the building is. only fifteen (15) feet from our factory as shown on petitioner ' s plan and derogates from the zoning code in that it calls for a seventy-five (75) foot back yard rear line under the purview of the pertinent section of the zoning by-law under which the Special Permit is sought. Please record the opposition of this adjoining Pr,operty owner to the application for a Special Permit and have this letter reflecting that fact spread on the records of the Appeals Board. IDEAL FINISHING COMPANY By : �oC I�La Uo President