6 PRINCE STREET - ZBA 1 6 Prince St. R-3 1
Robert P. McCauley T_- -
Ctu of Salem, . ' `�L`arSaCjjUggU5L.,.;._:,
z i? ml C . .... . .
Pcarb of Appeal
B4 MAY -8 P2 :41
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT P. MCCAULEY r` _, :J_E(fE
VARIANCES FOR LOTS A & B AT 6 PRINCE ST. (R-3) , SA�EM
A hearing on this petition was held on April 25, 1984 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Hopper, Strout and Associate
Members Bencal and LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting variances from frontage requirements on Lot A & B; from
density on Lot B and from square footage on lots A & B_
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially
affect the land, building or structure involved and which
are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures
in the samedistrict.
The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, stakes the
following findings of fact:
1 .- -No-opposition`or support to the plan was raised at the hearing;
2. Petitioner could not prove that enforcement of the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwis
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the-
hearing the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The variance requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without substantially derogating from the purpose, of
the Ordinance or the intent of the district.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously to deny the variance
requested.
VARIANCE DENIED
Richard A. Bencal, Acting tiecretary
GENE%..`RJ ; IH.a � yJl o� y� "� SHALL BE MADE PU RSUA�`T T,QT�Er D�'.��, T yEFJF •CANi'ING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
A'ECiY OF _S' uIS�30�ErH�SHI oAq� L
DF TH•S C::1SiG1 IN THE GM"' OF THE CITY CLERK.
P'`'3:.::•; C :" E\E.?AL t=V,'_ CHSPTER 808, SECTION 11. THE VAS ;A?-a OR $?_"•C:;,L ?-?.'IS
•::C: - ..cC:::. SHALL Nw.- %1 ,- EF:-,OT UNTIL A COPY OF THE Pz
C!TY CLERA. -A; " DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AI:9 NO APPEL HAS BrC:
+R '. tf 7:.6:1 Ai! AP?EAL HAS 9EE8 F:LE• THAT IT HaS BEEN C!S'HvED OR :-::IED IS
RC-.DE'. I':' TIE S3diH E:S_, ^ECISTRI OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNLE.' TtiE rIA:E OF T,i,-
IW RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED 0:1 THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL