3 ORCHARD TERRACE - ZBA (2) 3 Orchard Terrace R-1
Paul & Diana LaMontagne .
pC�
1
L%
V'
TINTI,QUINN&. SAVOY
222 ESSEX STREET
SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970
(508)745-8065
DIANA M.LAMONTAGNE (508)7442948
\y
01itg of ttlem, 'fflttssadjusetts
%4 Poara of �k"ettl
November 9, 1993
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 1993 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO
ALLOW CONSTUCTION OF A ROOFED OVER PORCH WHICH WILL ENCROACH ON THE
ALREADY NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD ,
it -
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of title.
Board of Appeal
i
(1Zit oftzlem, � Httssttcljuseti' ` y
s -�3nttra of �ku}tettl
�U
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen Touchette and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a roofed over porch which will extend the existing
nonconforming front yard setback. Property is located in the R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Hoard of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. A petition in favor, signed by ten (10) abutters and neighbors, was
submitted.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM *04P
page two C/
^r�SS
4. This is the only feasible location for a roofed over porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the .
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
October 20, 1993
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
� x
0
�v c
co
r� W
- N
_ - m
�'] 4P
(Eitn of idem, 'iEassadjusetA,
, r
�`f s
,..... 'Sourb of rAvpen!
U
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen Touchette and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a roofed over porch which will extend the existing
nonconforming front yard setback. Property is located in the R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. A petition in favor, signed by ten (10) abutters and neighbors, was
submitted.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
l
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page two
4. This is the only feasible location for a roofed over porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
October 20, 1993
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of appeal
� I
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
0
co
W
:� Gal
(1�itu of —1�ttlem, 4E. tt9sttcjju9etY*` 3
T r
'Board of Azr
}rettl
,
u
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL S DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen Touchette and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a roofed over porch which will extend the existing
nonconforming front yard setback. Property is located in the R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. A petition in favor, signed by ten (10) abutters and neighbors, was
submitted.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM y0{ -
page two J
4. This is the only feasible location for a roofed over porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
S. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
October 20, 1993
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
0
w
co
:� tai
"r
(�itg of -";- tzlem, �4' Ha95aCjjU5ejt*.k
bnttra of
peal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen Touchette and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a roofed over porch which will extend the existing
nonconforming front yard setback. Property is located in the R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. A petition in favor, signed by ten (10) abutters and neighbors, was
submitted.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page two
i 32
7"s
4. This is the only feasible location for a roofed over porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
October 20, 1993
/k—
Francis
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of appeal
r
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
c, x
0
C2 Gad
(r
w
37
_ N
:r
;b Cita of ttlem, 2IsstttljusPtt Y �,
� s attra of AV
pettl
: s
U
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen Touchette and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a roofed over porch which will extend the existing
nonconforming front yard setback. Property is located in the R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. A petition in favor, signed by ten (10) abutters and neighbors, was
submitted.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM y0`
page two y
C:T
4. This is the only feasible location for a roofed over porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
October 20, 1993
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
0
a
.� car
fl�ity of a`>ttlem, � 2IssFItIIu�PtTS/Y
Board of ^Au}1eu1
Y
".I
sS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen Touchette and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a roofed over porch which will extend the existing
nonconforming front yard setback. Property is located in the R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. A petition in favor, signed by ten (10) abutters and neighbors, was
submitted.
3. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM HOi J
page two
%T C13
rss
4. This is the only feasible location for a roofed over porch.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
S. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
October 20, 1993
Francis X. Grealish, Chairman
Board of appeal
Y
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL & DIANA LAMONTAGNE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
AT 3 ORCHARD TERRACE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
z
0
_ m
W
Sa
�p
DATE OF F.EARIidG lb 026
PETITIONER
70CATION 3 D
:-LOTION: TO GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND C r/
TO RE—HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE—HEAR CONTINUE
'SZEPNEP' O_GBADY /
GEORGE A. AHMED t/
FRANCIS GREALISH
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE 6/
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
i4QtffA1__ 1) P�
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS: /
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595.Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by PAUL AND
DIANA LAMONTAGNE for a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming front setback to allow con-
struction of a roofed over porch at 3 ORCHARD
TERRACE (R-1). Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 20,1993 AT 6:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
FRANCIS X. GREALISH, Jr., Chairman
October 6, 13, 1993 SN22487
�DuFRI IAT
a shy) 8/T e/,
JULY sO`T"! 18 19 20^21 22 20 24
NEW F-1 ACCT
ACCOUNT PROCE95 O
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595.Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by PAUL AND
DIANA LAMONTAGNE for a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming front setback to allow con-
,traction of a roofed over porch at 3 ORCHARD
TERRACE (R-1). Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 20,1993 AT 6:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
FRANCIS X. GREALISH, Jr., Chairman
October 6, 13, 1993
0 M E M 0
�a 7 rJ �,.
CITY OF SALEM _
., BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by PAUL AND
DIANA LAMONTAGNE for a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming front setback to allow con-
struction of a roofed over porch at 3 ORCHARD
TERRACE (R-1). Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 20,1993 AT 6:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
FRANCIS X. GREALISH, Jr., Chairman.
October 6, 13, 1993 _
e e a a
1� N
J
I
i
r..r_r_r�►_r w-w.w-w w
` APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1li# ofttI>rm, ttss�zczse##s
pourb of �ypraj
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS;
The Undersigned represent tat the y�G}5 are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc�,yted
at NO. . . .Three Orchard Ter ce, Salem, Massachusetts Zoning District.
Jh
. . . . . . . . . . . . •.. . . . . . • • • . . . 1J. . . . . ; and said parcel is affected b Section s
of the Massachusetts State Building Code. y ) " " " " " . .
"
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX .A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
n
0
e T,l
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
N/A
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Vj
. . . . ast
CD Paul F. LaMontagne Diana M: LaManta266
C:) Address3 Orchard Terrace, Salem, MA� � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . (508) 745-1'016
Pe ti ti oner ,. C � %
Diana M. LaMontagn & Paul 'F: 'I a96ntagn-
Address. ,3 ,Orc4ard Terrace, Salem, MA
Date„September,23„ 1993
Telephone. . .S508) 745-1016
By. . . .4�,' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
RE: Addition of front porch at 3 Orchard Terrace, Salem, MA
We the undersigned neighbors hereby have no objection whatsoever
to the addition of a farmer' s porch with a roof overhang at the
above-captioned address:
Name Residing at
t s
D
6P! 4h_'Y
�\
4
D
V
V
j y
zu
7k6t
if
OVv (� f
O
S
x Q
v -
� 7
w �
1
�'I t
r J f ttu tc ,t v
ti 4 , I
tll 1 �� O
If
k - C
:EY i
o�
I
d
Ex�rr/pr— Havre
� / O /
4 I Ex/sri.vc-
-- — 1814,3 — — - -
2y"9
12
/ ii_`✓/,i./.�l.�e• �/� V .S /V "' O/1. . / I j � ��y /`;'!. SJ�CiG �/�✓�^
SAX f�OsT 6 a C. (pTJ S vPPORTS
h�ch' 14�9,S7
.�4 /7�Nv E'�?,/LS Lc//SP1.AJZ 4S 6 0,C, t:4TJ
TO sz- 12UiZT ACCO 212:-, 721) c�u
w
0
J
�1\
1 � ,
'o
N 3'p
G
S
O
O
2 ^
b
J>
Y
ply
o F `
9 o�s7t s�F 'acp
oSS/ s p�
o
� SY.
\. O
oO.S
.► so.
a S 4S O � '?
.° . To y2 s°s o t7�66 1p
°6' poa�
a
Oo O f I
oma/ ss s s? �"03�0
/��\\J
� V �
CP
CIO
s
a1
v �O; `r v� O° - O poly
P
4� os u tfl�4 y5 oo mS� /ems
0 o 7 0
`IV OAF q�• y
.r.
X
�.S7 v ss� a \ q\ ,• O
d9
p F•r1 [� / .J n 1
V
V O7 9 bti Ov r+\ ^ OO w� 0%
OC> p�
O-
'N
2
3
. .......... 4
..............
FYI
3
7 SALEM, MA UIY?Ll 6/ 5
5 DATE c 09/29/93 6,
6 CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST
7 ........
";S
J ECT,.PR V -4 '\ �I- , I .".�,, , " ,,l:o��:"l,%......... 10 •
SUB 04
(IPEPTY p
........... 'f-1,
........ ......
PROPE T j ER A
"1",, 12
R C
To DIANA 11 :3
4 •
12 Sqrr) OWNFR
1
13 7
'.TERRACE,", 4"AMON TAGNE, PAUL F 8 0 R CHA R D
19
R 20-
...... .........
27 0398 0002-' ORCHARD TERRACE LEPKOWSKI NOMINEE 'TRUST 39 COFFIN 21 ST 220
7 MULLEIN JERRY C 7R W NEkIBURY MA 01985 23
is JQ R CHA P - 24
..........
'8EAT-1110E, 8. 2 �8AEe
. ........... IA b"i, "ib"
"I l2 ..........
................... ........ 111.1 12
gA 8
VH.LTMORC.J At F.-
TER
........... 27
•
. ....... . 28
7-
zs
21 o"t
2
WA 2 0
22 7 0402 0007 ORCHARD TERRACE DASH' DOUGLAS C 7 ORCHARD TERRACE 29
23 300
PATRICIA A SALEM MA 01970 31
24 OPOHAR PA(IF 32
27 ..040;�..............qQ95
25
-b
M I , l: 34
............ RAI N ..... .......
pf A 0,R I E 6 R C HA R D TE R R A, ........... .......... 35
26 ......;,
Ace.......
1,2,7.�'0,4
oo"Pb" ......... ...
ll� ..11-1 .......... ..... .......
............. 36
2a "7 37
29 0406 0069 ORCHARD STREET HUSSEY BLANCHE E 69 ORCHARD ST 38
HUSSEY PHILIP D SALEM MA 01970 39
30 27 Q4-n7 no7i OPCHAPb qTPF'F'T KANGA5Z F 7.1 ORCHARD ST 40
it , ..............1 11 1-1-1-1-1--- -
......... ....... .......... 41
......... 42
77777, ........
2
Z H ZMIN6 ...... t�g I'l. ........... s l 43
•
33, ............ STREET F ET
MANN"ING%, 'T ... ..... ............. ....
..........................
.1...........Il"I'l....... .....................
.27 0409 L1009 MANNING STREET YWUC JOHN J 9 MANNING ST 45
3546
SYLVIA R SALEM MA 019*70 47
311 14ANNZNG STRE, ZT C, 4 rPT qA1- Z C 'T 46
.Hf 11RrL
37
SAI 21
79
............... .......
l......... ......
50
..................... .
STREET e) N A
V, "MANWINJ5,l, 9 T l, .. ....
3 A
MEL1a� CIANht1NC, SI 5,
3: .............. ........
.................
40 53
41 540
55 • z
42 56
z
43 .
57
...... ......i... ....�l ......... ...
, % % , .......I.,...... 'l � ......... l.... ..
..........<, �'I', - ...�1,
N, 5
.. ...................... ......... ... ...............
41"'ll ...l"
5:
% ' %,,,........... ....... ..............l,
......... .......... z 60
45 ........
46 61
:
2 •
0 47 3
48 64
........... ......I I'll 1111-',
41 ......... ........... 65
..........
66
50 6
l........... 7
'011
51 268
n
N
52 69
0 10 53 710
54 72
5573
....... ....... ...... ...7777rr77777-77, 77.7
74
..............
75
V
7
.56
7
PETER M. CARON
CHIEF ASSESSOR