Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
48 MEMORIAL DRIVE - ZBA (2)
��('� _ 4 � �/� �� d 7 _ oom4� �� r f1lit of $Ulem, 'fflttssadjusetts C >� Puttra of Appeal February 27, 1992 NOTICEEIS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICEEOF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF DECKS AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Suffirall Clerk of the?Board Appcal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall he filed within 20 c-ays a`r:ar the date of filing of this decisicn in the office of the City C!erk. Pursu=n'.to plass. C,e,emI Laws, Chapter 808, section 11, the Varanca 0 `:jiecial Permit rrnfe herein shat! �o[take eifect until a ccl; cf the decision, Legit•,^ the re:'jificrtior of the City Cle.:kthat 20 days have ela;?s^c! eu.1 no e;;,rsr:�; has been filed, or that, if such appeal hs been filed, that ii has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the south EsscY Registry mi Deeds and indexed under the name or the rwner of record or is recorded and noted an the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL J 0. of '�zllrm, �uSsttCljuSPttB >/ Battra of _�upeal s _ r,? DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of decks. The property is located in an R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to the request. 2. That the decks would be in harmony with the neighborhood. r� DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page two 3 . The granting of this Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioners and would allow them a harbor front view. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2 . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing structures. 5. All conditions on a previous decision granted November 20, 1991 shall remain in effect and be incorporated into this decision. r ti m c v W W L� T/ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page three SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED February 19, 1992 Richard Febonio, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal ti O.. w Cr n, ti i 1 C 'tu of ttlrm, � ttsstzdiusetts r Bonra of �rr{reul DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of decks. The property is located in an R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. ,n more general terms, this Board is when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to the request. 2. That the decks would be in harmony with the neighborhood. .r DECISION ON THE PET TTION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN 7---T--LE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page two 3. The granting of this Special Permit would -enhance the quality of life for the petitioners and would allow them a harbor front view. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows : I. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing structures. 5. All conditions on a previous decision granted November 20, 1991 shall remain in effect and be incorporated into this decision. r � mo ti _ r r, G) N i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page three SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED February 19, 1992 Richard Febonio, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n~ m cc r r C7 L j (liitn of -'�ttlrm, �ttssttclTusetts r 'r� �i $3nttrd of �tprzd DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of decks. The property is located in an R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to the request. 2. That the decks would be in harmony with the neighborhood. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page two 3 . The granting of this Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioners and would allow them a harbor front view. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing structures. 5. All conditions on a previous decision granted November 20, 1991 shall remain in effect and be incorporated into this decision. r N m c � W - ro c� -7 i c J DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page three SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED February 19, 1992 Richard Febonio, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n~ q r ti ti I C�iity of -'�ttlrm, � ttssttrlTusetts si $ uttrd of -Au peal r� •-] `, DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held February 19, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of decks. The property is located in an R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to the request. 2. That the decks would be in harmony with the neighborhood. r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page two 3. The granting of this Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioners and would allow them a harbor front view. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Exterior finishes of the decks shall be in harmony with existing structures. 5. All conditions on a previous decision granted November 20, 1991 shall remain in effect and be incorporated into this decision. n � n� m r ti mo r � _ w co DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT AND CHARLEEN LITTLE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM page three SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED February 19, 1992 Richard Febonio, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this deciison, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in to South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal me ti n' � N ti n DATE OF HEARING PETITIONER ) LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT 2c SECOND TO DENY �/ SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL v i RICHARD FEBONIO (i FRANCIS GREALISH EDWAAD LUZINSKI STEPHEN TOUCHETTE L/ ASSOCIATE MEMBERS RONAPL E AR R BRECOUE CONDITIONS: ,,..CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing 1'or 211 persons i.. ested in Lhe petitia�submitted by ttobcrt and Char- Iccn LiMe for a Special 1'crniit to cxlend nonconforming front and side setbacks Lo allow construction of decks xL 48 Menuvial Drive(R-U. Said hearing to be held Wednesday, February 19, 1992 at 7:00 P.M., floe Salem Greco, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BIiNCAL, - airman February 5, 12, 1992 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a poblic hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Robert and Char- leen Little for a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of decks at 48 Memorial Drive(R-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday.February 19, 1992 at 7:119 P.M., one Salem Grcon, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman February 5, 12, 1992 SN75490 crrt• or SALEM Bonen or APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing 1'01-all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by ltohert and Char- leen Little for a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of(leeks al 48 Mlemoria Februare 19, Said hearing to be held 1Pedoesday, y 1992 at 7:00 P.M. one Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICNAell A. B13NCAL, Chairman February 5, 12, 1992 CITY OF SALEM e BOARD OF APPEAL ' 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing I'm'all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Robert and Chat' Icen Little for a Special Permit to extend nonconforming rmot and side setbacks to allow construction of(leeks it 48 Memorial Drive(11-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, Februar3 19, 19!12 at 7:00 P.I%I One Salem Green, 2nd floor. 1?1C1-IARD A. DENCAL, Chairman February 5, 12, 1992 SN75490 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Robert and Char- leen Little for a Special Permit to extend nonconforming front and side setbacks to allow construction of decks at 48 Memorial Drive(11-1). Said hearing to be held Wednesday, February 19, 1998 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. DENCAL, Chairman February 5, 12, 1992 SN75490 r r BOMM OF P.PPEALS APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . flLi#t� of airm, C4 ng5zjrhuSE##s JAN 16 2 30 FH °92 �uur>3 of �� ettl ppREEESCCEINED TO THE BOARD OCC��FTAIPPEAlA%.EM,14ASS. the Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. .yB.AiCkv mid e ZYt:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said Parcel is affected by Eectionisj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. scc-o" Q r Mo m �j^n x CD N D Co — 4 D � N The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons : -F��cca..se � sc9lP t " set-�c..ectis The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: ci�p�w� e2 SSC-cqQ t� hw 9 �Q �s�oll r k�a t eta e�� Owner./T'o(�e2i f �hnsC/deo.. ��t . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. 5`B �!u®:kr �l�i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . 5:��086 Petitioner. QCknclie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . .�—/6.93- . . . . . Telephonne�e."",,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . .da,./ 1.1 W...'.67' mP . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. z s z z ❑ ❑ . e } APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a� BOARD OF UPEALS 9(9itil of �Mljem 117assariT tiffs �+ JAN I t7 G a0 I p M I JL ✓Psarb of `AFpral I CCEI4'ED TO THE BOARD 6FT1A10VE§,1GF ,MASS, The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . $ ./(i�'ltGfltCri P.h� 1:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; --onino District. . �.! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Sectiones ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. sC.Ccs c1C ptr S-vJ fY6 d 'A T R om r-3 m n The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: jF'CtL e. 06 SLC@e t- -6jQoyn1- se+b cAS The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: (JCAIw 1z t'�uck_c0 ���lAt-� rf �e ko Owner. . G�.Ie . . . . . .u. . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. ./ . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . p4o_�e� �l. .lG� ?` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO._. .. ___ _.... ITII I ION 10 BOARD OI AI'I'Ii A1.S I A IION I'I.I I I IONI R._.__........_ _ _............. - I ONDII IONS ........... ..._._..................._........ ....................__ ..................__..__........._ ._........._.............................._... ........... PETIT ION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... Slclt' . ' .................. .......... 19......... CID s I' PLAN SHOWING BUILDING LOCATION AT NOT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE IN SALEM , V OCT. 11 , 1991 SCALE 1 " = 29 ' 1 Cape Ann Land Surveyors, Inc. Danvers, Mass. 0 MEMORIAL DRIVE 70.0o' - 14.V Existing NOTE(S): dwellin No. 48 For title see deed book 4149 page 351 filed in the Essex South Registry of Deeds. Shown on Salem Assessors map 42 lot 31 01 ti 1J O Zj V o Ld f0 .• •.v idU u', '.�•�dTk,IN � aWj 9, 470 sq. ft. 72.06' DRAMS er. J.R. DAM 10/11/91 Ar .1l a L e w i c k i QYEGM er E.B. DRAWO Ra: 32001 ,roe NCL 000320 SAEE7 1 of 1 Previousapplication before the mrd of Aptreal Property located at48 Memorial Dr. for sial permit to add a = d story MORTGAGE INSPECT110"i Robert & Charleen Little addition was approved 10/20/91 Cape Ann Land Surveyors, !nc. Owners Danvers, Moss. NOTE(S)- LOCATION. SALEM, MASS. SCALE: 1'=40' DATE: 1/8/91 This is a rortgage inspection survey and not REFERENCE: BOOK 10983 PAGE 503 an instrument survey, therefore this plot plan ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS is for mortgage inspection purposes only. I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the building(s) ibis survey is bases on survey mories of others. shown on this plan are located on the ground as shown and that they conformed Bushes, shrubs, fences, and tree lines do not to the zoning setbacks of the CITY OF SALEM necessarily indicate property lines. when constructed. The building(s) are not located in the flood hazard zone, as defined by FEMA. MEMORIAL 1 ' 1v'E o, 70.00 A a.o' �1A Os AfA,s Existing X81' z 'a® stNary Ilin — 4 -' FD48 W tN 2Zr C3 � WORK PROPOSED :°' A zemrd Flom Dack - 4' 10' Fl4ll.Il)d Floor Deck`� Grand Floor Dec 12 /jj M a j ¢ w i c k- i �r Property located at Previous application before the Beard of Appeal 48 Memorial D r. for special permit to add a sa-nad story MORTGAGE INSPECTION Robert & Charleen Little addition was approvEd 10/20/91 Cape Ann Land Surveyors, !nc, owners Danvers, Mass. LOCATION: SALEM, MASS. N0 E(S): SCALE: 1'=40' DATE: 1/6/91 This ;s a rrnortgage inspection survey and not REFERENCE: BOOK 10983 PAGE 503 an instrument survey, therefore this plot plan ESSEX 'SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS is for mortgage inspection purposes only. I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the building(s) This survey is based on survey marks of others. shown on this plan are located on the ground as shown and that they conformed Bushes, shrubs, fences, and tree lines do not to the zoning setbacks of the CITY OF SALEM. necessarily indicate property lines. when constructed. The building(s) are not located n the flood hazard zone, as defined by FEMA. MEMOR AL U i VE- 70.00 '4 4.d' `PL- A Of MA=S,} Existing 3k story I ix �® stdwel in EIIWF�; No. 48 ` spN s 17: O O SrFvE \ WORK 1• PROPOSED: / 9,470 ft. co �' ® Floor Dec _ 4' 10' 1 � ar Second f_ ✓� ® Floor Deck- Ground © Gram] Floor Dec 12 / I�I I_l 72.05' I / N / P �f a l e w i c i PLAN SHOWING BUILDING LOCATION J AT NO � . 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE I N SALEM , M OCT. 112 1991 SCALE 1 " = 20 ' Cape Ann Land Surveyors, Inc. Danvers, Mass. MEMORI L DRIVE 70.001 inN 14.V Existing NOTE(S): dweNo. 48 For title see deed book 4149 page 351 filed In the Essex South Registry of Deeds. 15.V Shown on Salem Assessors map 42 lot 31 ri ~ b et 0 tj V � w W LV N to .� M4,t, \ yG � 1 11 �rN 110 W 9, 470 sq. ft. 14 72.06 oe4mv er. J B DAM 10/11/91 Ar F JC a l e w i c k i aifWav ae E B. arAaac iva: 32001 .,ne NO.- 000320 sr,1E7 1 or 1 PLAN SHOWING BUILDING HOWING- BUILDING LOCATION AT NO . 4 ,8 MEMORIAL DRIVE IN SALEM/ MASS * OCT. 11 , 1991 SCALE 1 " = 20 ' Cape Ann Land Surveyors, Inc. Danvers, Blass. MEMORIAL DRIVE 1n 70.0o' 14.0' Existing NOTE(S): dwelling No. 48 For title see deed book 4149 page 351 filed in the Essex South Registry of Deeds. 15.0' Shown on Salem Assessors map 42 lot 31 Ol ~ tj V -0 O] (V N N � UN { \ G to S �. 9, 470 sq. ft. 72.06' ozamv er. J.B. DAM 10111191 Ar jV ar t e u i c k i affrAly er. E B. aeemvc ivaI 32001 ..ne Na 000320 of 1 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITV HALL PAGE, 1 y° .......... DA3 02 05,/ ......... , M��'i its, 4 �,,l;',�"�l,, - 3 ....... ........ . 7 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 42 LOT. cloj,.t SUFF. 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 004-8 MEMORIAL DRIVE 7 T,46& PUT ............ `I-..... ................. X-4 1411l, .......... ..... ....- 41AP QQr- 13 42 004-8 MEM'ORIAL (_:[TTL.{::DRIVE ROBERT I JR 48 MEMORIAL. 0,13 �4 * 12 1: 13 ............. 17 ICaf ..... 14 ...... MEM(-,�RJ Atf., PRI 1 180 ........... Q. AN' - 31ORIAL' 0 49l 1,1 f -lpRIVE t1ARF'0Nf,.5E '1970 ...........7, zo ...... ........... 4-1 1 .................... 16 88116 1 *A F REP' 21 • 17 SALEM MA 6-1970 220 le 4'.'-' 1-3029 0054 MEMORIAL DRIVE DION ROBERT' R 154 MEM)oRIAL ,,H 23 24 .......... 19 T— CHA RLITS, ........ 26 20 ........... 1-1.................... 27 • ... ......... .......... ....... 21 22 ... .. .. _ . 2 23 CARNELLA SALEM MA 01570 3010 42 0033 0044 MEMORIAL DRIVE SZPAK MATISLAW 44 MEte,'ORTAL DR 31 24 A0. ri-I r-,7f-k 32 25 3m .......... R,TC# ................... .... ......... 3 .i 26 ...... ......... ......... 510 ............. .......... 27 28 37 0 290 42 0101 0015 LARKIN LANE PIALEWICK.1 RICHARD R 11 LARKIN LANE 3: 30 MA 01'�Z( 40 31 ... ........ ........ ............. ...... 42 32 ....... ........ .......... 43 .... ........ ............ 7m33 "I,,............. 44 34 45 35 46 .7 36 48 37 ....... ... ... 49 ................. ......... �50 38 ............. ......... ........ ....... 52 39 ........ .......... . ........... ........ 40 5 5 •41 55 42 se 43 ....... ........... ...... . 57 '58 44 5 45 ......%......... ........ 80 46 61 62 47 63 48 49 ...... ........% 6 50 52 69 • 70 53 7 •' 54 71 w5 ............ 73 • IPETERA.� : CAR 74 ss75 7� ....... .... .. .... 7� �l • y9 ey _ ti9� C;? C. L.� h ♦ A � ye L � � 3� 07" v- IS 6 6 9 OA a4 �e to 60 �A 60 Aho VV A��. v Ci . . . Ai 4 x JL 0 CV v � _ - s /� d . dl 9 TX as n k 0 . . Q � ej a O 95 � .. 160 6100 Pt 67 r0 �/ ✓ x`09 0,230 soo \94 �,s 1 C tba t[ zs 'oe /3 X66 :KIN CKz 65_5 O X000 O \� 1,60`1 10 4 zo S i Jai A 6 Dt9p8 t01� a 1093 p� 300a Py�� 50 �� 13,800 t0' 30 �h �j1\ + V 9bA '� 10 OJT oo I r APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �, 2OAP.D Gi= A'P�ALS u of �zzirrn �4Nttsszjrfnmrjts J� tp@.t t, r n TO THE BOARD `S �FT'AI�IPE�IL:S:: ., :'...., -he Undersigned represent _nat '�e .re .^e owners certain carcei Jr lana luca_= ;t "lo. . . . '/$ .1Ufxccuti- .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . street: = mna District. . : : ! . . ; and kala Circe ! IS aifeCt_o Dy _ec',onts . . . . . of the i•lassacnusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Insoector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. � Stcc•�-ct I��K 1X.k �, �`x'e plU,nS �ui�rnui•`d r•� mo m n IV C nl N �= CO S .— T D �7 N N The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: f,f , L,� LSC 06 SLCIe t- _6xc,nt se.+ba<Jcs The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: i Owner. Lc _. .. .. . . . . . Address. .y$ 'Veft«;uc D�:.. . . ... ... . . . Telephone. . 7f�5 08 6 . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . ,GA' 7Ce Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Date. . . �6.�1�? . .�. . . . . . . Telephone. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . By. . . .C,L,Gi. Pei !u. zil_x . .... . .. . . . . .. Three copies of thq application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a chedk, for advertising in the amount of. ... ..... ....... ........ four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evenina News: ti 4. Ctu of --5ttlem' 49assadiusetts t• 1 i ` s �aara of r�upeal NOY LI' L DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT I . & CHARLEEN M. LITTLE (PETITIONERS) , FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DR. A hearing on this petition was held on November 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, V. Chairman; Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners are requesting a Special Permit in order to construct a second floor addition to their single family home in this R-I zone. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence . presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioners are in need of additional room to accommodate their family. 2. Their was no opposition to this request. 3. The proposed second floor addition is in harmony with the neighborhood homes. 4. The second floor addition shall consist of three bedrooms and one bath. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and will be in harmony with the neighborhood. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the City Ordinance. Therefore; the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. All co�struction to be in compliance with city and state buildi.ng codes. Nov Lr� DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT I . & CHARLEEN M. LITTLE (PETITIONERS) , FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 48 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SALEM Page two. 2. Construction to be in accordance with plans as submitted. 3. A building permit to be obtained. 4 . A certificate of occupancy to be obtained. 5. Exterior finished of the addition to be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety to be included in the addition. Special Permit Granted November 20, 1991 iTdnald G. Plante, Associate Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision.If Any, filed 808 and shall be shell tie made pursuant to See"17 p1 the te er^ p the date of fit ng of th sdec i Om n the office of the City Clerk,n of Pursuant to Mass.General Laws.Chapter am.section 11,the Varlerles or f!7ecial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the city Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed.or that, if such appeal has been filed,that it has been dismissed or denied Is recorded in the South Essar isRgistry of oeeds and errecorded and noted indexed howner of record o[ an the wnees certificate ofTitle. BOARD OF APPEAL! is Property located at revicus amlicatirn morn the Baird of 'tel 48 Memorial D r . for ST=al pe=t to add a ward stcr,, MORTGAGE lN5REC70"i addition was approval 10/20/91 Robert Char l e e n Little Cape Ann Land Surveyors, 'r.�_ owners Danvers, Moss;. LOCATION: SALEM, MASS. NOTE(S). SCALE: 1'=40' DATE: 1/6/91 This is a mortgage inspection survey and not REFERENCE: BOOK 10983 PACE 503 an instrument survey, therefore this plot plan ESSEX "SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS is for mortgage inspection purposes only. I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the building(s) This sur•✓ry is based on survey marks of others. shown on this plan are located on the ground as shown and that they conformed Bushes, shrubs. fences, and tree lines do not to the zoning setbacks of the CITY OF SALEM nec:�ssarily indicate property lines. when constructed. The buildin4{sj are not 'ocatea irr the flood hazard zone, as defin,ea tv EMA. MEMGRI' AL F) V a 70.00 qi SP�1HUf pA:y�C a.n' irng a1'�gl w '° �� w •�O� aY dwalfin -® f ' g rNr O No. 48 P � � I V rx WORK PROPOSED: :Seed Floor Deck - 4' 10' wi 9,470 sq. ft. r i° - r% ® Gmtard Floor Lmc- } aumd Floor Daicf 12 1 A 1 72.06' I X / F 3f 42 A--.� k--�jLNk-T Lk-. r-1Llvl . AT NO . 48 MEMORIAL Df IN SALEM , MASS , OCT. 11 , 1991 SCALE 1 " = Cape Ann Land Surveyors, Inc. Danvers, Mass. ------------ MEMORI /4L DRIVE 7o.0o• 14.o• Existing NOTE(S): dwelling For title see deed book No. 48 filed In the Essex Soutt is.o• Shown on Salem Asses! d ~ 0 ti V '0 w � N •N h 40 in a %J 9, 470 sq. ft. 72.06• aUAW er. J.B. a e w i c k Z f+Erxac a E.B a /V 770n i ✓ �� o0 et, \ , v- 050 � 10 O $ A �A 1100 66 O � � 43 v� P 9A1° 4./6 AC 9 w a� 690 e3010 � - !6►tea _ !,{t 10 00 00 of s � `+ 95 14 38 {ole M7 Ah ` X / , 5 1600/\ g100 P• tds 686 ty0 + E�63� /=s O 34 v e o O 10 t iy° �s, tt got /3.266 °* e• KIN t 1O 6 0 r0 b0 ° i• 66 to.f i� MJF. 1093 p0e P,tv 50 °j O ro rs,aoo y 9 / IPO •' \ 60 O � / r00 6yX1000 gt00,/x\ 'o ' , T� �- -� � "A � � �_