7 & 9 MEAD COURT - ZBA 7 & 9 Mead Court R-2
-_ Glenn Beaudet, Petitioner/owner (9) j
-- Fraser, eta1, owner (7)
qr \
µ,
cn--
'f
(Cit" of -,'�ttlem, ^4Ha99aCjjU5rft9
Boara of Appeal OCT 4 2 51 f ii 93
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR VARIANCES AT
7 MEAD COURT AND 9 MEAD COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property at 9 Mead Court, are requesting
variances to allow property at 7 Mead Court (shown on plan as lot A) & 9
Mead Court (shown on plan as Lot C) to be redivided resulting in the
transfer of 460 square feet (shown on the plans as Lot B) from Lot A to Lot
C. 7 Mead Court is owned by P. Blais, D. Hanussak & F.Fraser. Property is
located in an R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The additional land will provide relief to the petitioner for off street
parking.
3. The owner of 8 Mead Court spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The added 460 sq.ft. will increase petitioners land to 1571 sq. ft.
7
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR A VARIANCE AT
7 MEAD CT. & 9 MEAD CT. , SALEM
page two
5 The granting of the variance will allow petitioner a fuller use of the
property.
6. The proposed division will not have a negative affect from this
proposed division.
7. Additional space for snow plowing for the city will be permitted
because of the removal of on street parking by the petitioner.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. Division shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall present plans to the Planning Board for their
approval.
n C=
4. Petitioners shall not park their vehicles on the street.
VARIANCE GRANTED '— N
September 15, 1993
� 3
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET
FOR VARIANCE AT 7 MEAD COURT & 9 MEAD COURT, SALEM
page three
OCT 2 5i
Ss
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
✓
of �ttlem, ^fttssurl useits .
> s Board of Au}ieul OCT y 2 51 iii '9�
ci;r
--'ASS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR VARIANCES AT
7 MEAD COURT AND 9 MEAD COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property at 9 Mead Court, are requesting
variances to allow property at 7 Mead Court (shown on plan as lot A) & 9
Mead Court (shown on plan as Lot C) to be redivided resulting in the
transfer of 460 square feet (shown on the plans as Lot B) from Lot A to Lot
C. 7 Mead Court is owned by P. Blais, D. Hanussak & F.Fraser. Property is
located in an R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The additional land will provide relief to the petitioner for off street
parking.
3. The owner of 8 Mead Court spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The added 460 sq.ft. will increase petitioners land to 1571 sq. ft.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR A VARIANCE AT
7 MEAD CT. & 9 MEAD CT. , SALEM
page two
5 The granting of the variance will allow petitioner a fuller use of the
property.
6. The proposed division will not have a negative affect from this
proposed division.
7. Additional space for snow plowing for the city will be permitted
because of the removal of on street parking by the petitioner.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. Division shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall present plans to the Planning Board for their
approval.
n G
4. Petitioners shall not park their vehicles on the street. <
VARIANCE GRANTED N
September 15, 1993
_ r
= 3
�n
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET
FOR VARIANCE AT 7 MEAD COURT & 9 MEAD COURT, SALEM
page three
OCT y .
2 53 .;",ii
Cis S5
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
< (1litn of a$ttjVM, ^4Ea5StttjjU13Ptt9
-Snttrd of .A, peal OCT 51
t;
"SS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR VARIANCES AT
7 MEAD COURT AND 9 MEAD COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property at 9 Mead Court, are requesting
variances to allow property at 7 Mead Court (shown on plan as lot A) & 9
Mead Court (shown on plan as Lot C) to be redivided resulting in the
transfer of 460 square feet (shown on the plans as Lot B) from Lot A to Lot
C. 7 Mead Court is owned by P. Blais, D. Hanussak & F.Fraser. Property is
located in an R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the proposed request.
2. The additional land will provide relief to the petitioner for off street
parking.
3. The owner of 8 Mead Court spoke in favor of the petition.
4. The added 460 sq.ft. will increase petitioners land to 1571 sq. ft.
J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR A VARIANCE AT
7 MEAD CT. & 9 MEAD CT. , SALEM
page two
5 The granting of the variance will allow petitioner a fuller use of the
property.
6. The proposed division will not have a negative affect from this
proposed division.
7. Additional space for snow plowing for the city will be permitted
because of the removal of on street parking by the petitioner.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. Division shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall present plans to the Planning Board for their
approval.
o
4. Petitioners shall not park their vehicles on the street.
VARIANCE GRANTED N
September 15, 1993 r
- - —o
3 S
�vmed�6
George A. Ahmed, Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET
FOR VARIANCE AT 7 MEAD COURT & 9 MEAD COURT, SALEM
page three
OCT 2 53
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
h
,nmgbT
b f�itg of ,S§ttlem, 49assadjusetts
Paurb of "Pal
kFglm-��
October 7, 1993
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF OCTOBER 4, 1993 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF GLEN & JANE BEAUDET FOR A VARIANCES TO ALLOW
DIVISION OF LAND AT 7 & 9 MEAD COURT TO BE DIVIDED SO AS TO CONVEY
460 SQ.FT. OF LAND FROM 7 MEAD COURT TO 9 MEAD COURT.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE
CITY CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
Board of Appeal
-;ATE OP .:EARI ;G
2ETITI021ER �,
..00ATIM: / `� YID r1, C6L�e Z
OTION: IO GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE—HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
"0 CONTINUE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE—HEAR CONTINUE
STEPHEN O'GRADY Z
GEORGE A. AHMED l/
FRANCIS GREALISH
ASSOCIATE 'MEMBERS
9N n
[rte�D r'�..liiiTT
i
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS/ /
e C2
- APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(�i#g ofrriem, �z��ttcllusE#fs
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represehat h / is are the owners of a certain parcel of land to ted
at NO. . .� .Git�^G�. . .�. . .1 ��Q.C�e . T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. '?r
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� s
4 a� N
asa PIA
No
Q o
C> N >W ry Sjp> 20
Cr) 4J^Jcf O r�✓a N
Un
LU �.
_ r� �p �g
rq sin cn
..s U
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Nl�
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons: '
AiA4 aMCP I � VC'If( & ets Vejulvet� -(-o Af )o�,
�vo'Dei/ .-}v be. reCQq14.6d VCsv� �tv�S I � F'v�e �tvavtS�P� o
a Meade, U .
XOwner. t�.. . , ... . . . . . . .
Address^. . . W!.''`'�`�p.<IK/ . . . . . . . .
Telephone.
Petitioner.
Address. . ..7.gegc . . . . 5 . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 �r"� SL
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER...........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDITIONS .
.......................... ........................ ...........
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
............................................. 19.........
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HAIL PAGE
+ SFtiLEM, Mla Q1970
2 C>RTE dt31�615?7 z
' •' ! �e " 3
3
GERTIF2'ED, ;ABUTTERS LIST 4
4 5
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 27 LOT: 0067 SUFE: 6,
s PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0007 MEADE COURT s
] ; ASSESED .OiJNER ERASER Ll IN R ET AL1 ; 9
• 8 " o •
12
0 13
410
12 27 0067 0007 MEADE COURT FRASER LIONEL. R ET ALI `18 FLOYD ROAD 15
6
., u
n
OQ59 003' ESUFFUM STREET CER�lON1 SH3 RLFY M 13 APPL ETON ST 6 •
15
46"Rid .. ..:.. ... ...' ,. ....!
F 70 X120
SALM P1A 014 ;' 19
16414p T 21 =
. 17 SALEM MA 01970 220
1e :'7 006'2'• 0006 RANDALL STREET AMARAL. MANUE:L DO 6 RANDALL STREET' 23
z4
zo 7 QII63 fJdII4 RAN7ALL STREET MROZ LOUIS` C ".4'.',RANDAL L: STREt 71 36 •
zt , ••J. - „ ,: P1Rtl7 Al ICE:: T SA 'h1 MA (3-1970.. 17
',28
. R6 R
33 ,y PAMELA A SALEM MA 01970 30.
za 27 0065 0125 NORTH STREET CARSON WANDA 1'1 125 NORTH STREET 3+
3
z5 7 0066 01,27 NORTH STREET BAH AL ARWINDER S 1"27: NORT1l3STREE T `33
26 .: 35
27 •
,,...! ,...., , I .,•
SALEPI MA II1970
.
37
28 CIO BLA.IS PAUL B DERRY N H 03038 3
2927 0069 0008 MEADE COURT HEDIO ST'EFAN 11 16 GREEN ST 390
30 40
31 ;: ^+'7 dd7�! L71f9 fJ 'iRTH STREET GODF.REY MARIE V ,1e.4 NORTH,,;STREET: :az•
.32 % ,143
.
SA`L1 M MA ,Q 1970 .
44
34 45
.38 46 •
471 36 48
3] '''49
•36 , O
51 •
39, S2
.41 54 'x
55 2
42 56
43
59 a
44, 80 }
46 61
2
8 •
•
47 63
48 64
49 65
S1 W. �88 •
50
52 69
]O .. 83 Ji
54 72
PETER M CA J4 .
56 f: CHIEF, ASSESSt3R 75
J J
•
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE, 1Le
QAI r.
DATE ,
•
MA 949 9
2
`ABUTTERSCERTIFIED 3 2
4
•
4 5
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 27 LOT: 0068 BUFF. 6 •
PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0009 MEADE COURT 7
6 1h, n
7 .........
........... .......
10
a
RERR,
IV 13
4
27 0068 0009 MEADE COURT BEAUDET GLEN P 9 MEADE COURT 150
16
T3
77777=�,
� ��1�1.1 1 , , 17
%
•
14 "
00 -STWET,,
HW
�,�CtUNI,�BHIHLE'y
.................
....... .
-MA", p .
..... 20
SALEM MA 01970 22
:
7 23
a 27 0061 0008 RANDALL STREET AOUN ANDRE M 8 RANDALL STREET 24
........ 'SALEM,"NA
25
STREET 26
-ETT
/Lj,
'A' 'AMA RA L MAN UEL Do
L
20 RAND LL' •
27
-,�",MARIA L ...... ... ..
21
...... ........
ou 1�8
...............
zz
MROZ ALICE T SALEM MA 01970 3
23 27 0064 0 123 NORTH STREET LEVESQUE ROBERT G JR 123 NORTH ST 3
24 ! r—M J
5 .......%........ 4. 33
2
............
34
OQ6S D1 S NORTH'*�STREEIT.'. 'CARSON NORTH-'STREET-,'��%,,
A A
............
.. .........
..............
SALEP,1:,' . ... .....
...... ......�;�", I I I I I , ,"' , "� ',111,35
A-01970
27 ...........
0 36
28 2 P 84:Rr 37
29 SALEM MA 01970 3810
27 0067 0007 MEADE COURT FRASER LIONEL. R ET ALI IS FLOYD ROAD 39
30 ±-o
......... 41
......................
0069s
MEAD E,.��COUH F.�,-% HE'DIO' EFA ...... 42
3 .......7
32 11........
........... "'DA
LjN 1)4
"B HWI 9 ......
43
b'O ��o 1310
4
•
.................. ....... ......—".—............;....... .........
4
33
34 45
TURCOTTE A J TURCOTTE V M TRS SALEM MA 01970 460
0 35 47
36 46
. .. .
37 .........
...........
............. ......
s
50
• 51
%
.........
........ ..... 52
..............
3: x.,,.,,"%, �I�4 —
........ V ........
40 53
54 0 0 41
55
42 56
z
437, 57
...........�s,
5
........ ..... .......
............ ............. 59 0
44
45fie
...... ................ c i802
46
61
62 •
0 47 63
48 64,
49 K 1 1,1 1 1 65
• 66 •
............ 67
50
51
69
52 700
0�53 71
54 72
777=T,
55s
......... RE TR aN17 4 0
C
HXEF ASSESSR,
6
..........
-
�h
lb,
ti ti `° `�� 4150 .1s 9J4 Je dd ��O
0 b eo 0 ��
•J </h� R CD B}
ry ry y V vJ
q45 ��1Z 6AR
� • �,ti s b 6 0 '+�
\ �-D tiO`9°
0 CO
50° 65B° S, JJ� do 500
R5A.
0
too
a`� •� y0 0
0 h' ao
L
a aq hfl� �p0i r a 0�BB 5\00 09, p
Ol
Ah 6y gid, �
O psS yS� ddS 0136. �, 6,1� 6\B1 D+
0 �� AB 0 �� q
p10 '10fib` �q1 ��' c bnv , 10 y5\ •
O a �
d pi�•40O a y0B
l4�
dd d 16 1 0���O \eo bF`g � Q•
P
9
CK 0
JO qb
100
0 100 200
000 - , 00£ OOZ 001 0 001
ab
Z9y ^a0 O� y5 r �G QQ9
gOy '0
d E ° C
0Ile (F
L0 sir �s� fsd0
9ti 9 se aj � g O c
d9 G) ` $ LZ�, as ° I
,0\ 4 r9 oP. ��!
ti ° y29 ti
00 O-be
S
Or y 00��
Q°L0't' "ti11' y°titi wti U\ °°y�
4) °C) lta o°�'' ''° 049- °5
'V ae y
+ ver
�V. oa
,w
4 g�ti a 2
r9 �y 9u
qs • 9 a' OC I LSI O�
bs a4 1 0� / t,L 2�9 ti 66 tl ar °e..�a1r0 ro` cy 4
141
O da �e Ry �� OQ ° 1 p�� as °ye "r a� r�'ra ao
p0 a
so
0 °� \
N/F N/F N/F
EDWARD F . & MANUEL DO . AMARAL ANDRE M . AOUN
WANDA M . CARSON BOOK 6400/751 BOOK 9493 PAGE 511
BOOK 6439 PAGE 704 MAP 27 LOT 62 MAP 27 LOT 61
CONCRETE BLOCKS
IRON RODOVER
(found) 0 .31 ' 0.82' S 60'-27'-38" W S 61'-09'-46" W
58.81' 12.50' 30.00'
LOT C
1111 S ft 3.B'
"FRASER" LOT A
2197 S ft m "BEAUDET" 3
w
' , Q
N/F
IMALUMUSTORY
- ANTHONYJ . &ARViNDERS . BANAL m
SHIRLEY M . CERVONI
BOOK 6932 PAGE 717 • m BOOK 5473/115
MAP 27 LOT 66 #7 m I2 1/2 STORY Z MAP 27 LOT 59 t
cmv WOOD
LOT B c #q
460 s f t
TOP
BRICK 0.44' m 59.35' 12.20' 30.00' 3.5'
TO NORTH STREET • N 60'-39'-27" E N 600-39'-27" E
<----- 64.7'+— m
0
M E A D E C 0 U R T
I INCH - 10 FEET
10 0 10 20
NOTE: LOT B IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A BUILDABLE LOT . . . . ,
AND TO BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART OF LOT C.
ZONE BI SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
MIN. LOT AREA 6,000 S.F.
MIN. LOT WIDTH 60' PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
MAX. LOT COVERAGE 40%
MIN. FRONT YARD 15'
MIN. SIDE YARD101
REID LAND SURVEYORS
MIN. REAR YARD 300'
MAX. HEIGHT OF BUILDING 30'
365 CHATHAM ST . , LYNN, MA
SCALE 1 " = 10 ' JUNE 2, 1993
"R93 008"
93-4
N/F N/F N/F
EDWARD F . & MANUEL DO . AMARAL ANDRE M . AOUN
WANDA M . CARSON BOOK 6400/751 BOOK 9493 PAGE 511
BOOK 6439 PAGE 704 MAP 27 LOT 62 MAP 27 LOT 61
CONCRETE BLOCKS
IRON RODOVER
(found) 0.31' 0.82' S 60'-27'-38" W S 61'-09'-46' W
58.81' 12.50' 30.00'
LOT C
ilii sq ft 3.e'
rl
"ERASER" LOT ALL1! 2197 S ft ro m "BEAUDET" 3
N/F e' 0 1 1/2 STORY `; m w c' i, ANTHONYr J . &
ARVINDER S . BANAL m ALUMINUM SIDED o ^� m SHIRLEY M . CERVONI
BOOK 6932 PAGE 717 • m BOOK 5473/115
cc
MAP 27 LOT 66 0. #7 N 2 1/2 STORY z MAP 27 LOT 59
WOODcr.
1LOT B `meq
460 sq f t
TOP
4m '
BRICK 0.4 ' vi 59.35' 12.20' 30.00' 3.5
TO NORTH STREET - N 606-39'-27" E N 60'-39'-27' E
<----- 64.7'+- m
0
M E A D E C 0 U R T
1 INCH 10 FEET
10 0 10 20
NOTE: LOT B IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A BUILDABLE LOT '
AND TO BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART OF LOT C.
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
ZONE 81
MIN. LOT AREA
MIN. OT WIDTH 6,000 S.F. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
MAX. LOT COVERAGE 40%
MIN. SDENYARDRO 10' REID LAND SURVEYORS
MIN. REAR YARD 30'
MAX. HEIGHT OF BUILDING 30'
365 CHATHAM ST . , LYNN, MA
SCALE I " = 10 ' JUNE 29 1993
"R93 008"
93-4