Loading...
41 MASON STREET - ZBA (3) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. BING REALTY TRUST, STEPHEN, W. HALEY, TRUSTEE, ) �� PlaintiffsIV j FOR THF tjPERIOHC0UNC0ORT VS. ) v OF Esse J4 2013 REBECCA CURRAN, JAMIE METSCH, ) ANNIE HARRIS, MICHAEL DUFFY, ) BONNIE BELAIR,JIMMY TSITSINOS and RICHARD DIONNE, as they constitute the ) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE ) CITY OF SALEM, ) Defendants ) NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given pursuant to M.G.L.Chapter 40A, Section 17,that an Appeal has been filed with the Superior Court Department, Essex Division, on January �, 2013 appealing a Decision of the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals dated December 26,2012 and filed with the Salem City Clerk on January 2, 2013. Said Decision denied an Application for a Variance filed by the Plaintiff, Stephen W. Haley, Trustee, concerning the real estate located at 41 Mason Street, e r- L rn a Lm C0 m y 3 I Salem,Massachusetts wherein the Board denied the amendment of Variance granted on March 19, 2003 in which the petitioner requested an amendment to certain hours of operation under the original Variance. Respectfully submitted, BING REALTY TRUST, STEPHEN W. HALEY, TRUSTEE By its attorney, Jo R. I eilty, quire BO#264360 40 Lowell Str et Peabody, MA 01960 (978) 531-7900 Dated: January , 2013 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. 13 -9� BING REALTY TRUST STEPHEN W. HALEY, TRUSTEE, Plaintiffs FILE® VS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ) FOR THE COUNTY OF ESSEX REBECCA CURRAN, JAMIE METSCH, ) JAN 18 2013 ANNIE HARRIS, MICHAEL DUFFY, ) BONNIE BELAIR,JIMMY TSITSINOS and RICHARD DIONNE, as they constitute the ) C_ LERi� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE ) CITY OF SALEM, ) Defendants ) COMPLAINT Now comes the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter and states the following: 1. Judicial Review is hereby requested under the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 17, as amended, of the Decision of the Board of Appeals of the City of Salem dated December 26, 2012, filed with the City Clerk of the City of Salem on January 2, 2013, insofar as it relates to the premises located at 41 Mason Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. 2. The Plaintiff, Bing Realty Trust, Stephen W. Haley, Trustee resides at 41 Mason Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts and 111 Birch Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts respectively. 3. That the Plaintiff, Bing Realty Trust, Stephen W. Haley, Trustee is the owner of the real property located at 41 Mason Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts by virtue of a Deed from Joseph A. Jones recorded at the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 18794, Page 179, and which is identified on the City of Salem Assessors' Parcel ID 26-0087-0. 4. That the Defendant, Rebecca Curran, is an individual residing at 14 Clifton Avenue, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was the Chairman and a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 5. That the Defendant,Jamie Metsch, is an individual residing at 18 Oliver Street, Apt. 92, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 6. That the Defendant, Annie Harris, is an individual residing at 28 Chestnut Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 7. That the Defendant, Michael Duffy, is an individual residing at 1 Warren Court, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 8. That the Defendant, Bonnie Belair, is an individual residing at 102A Wharf Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 9. That the Defendant, Jimmy Tsitsinos, is an individual residing at 6C Wharf Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 10. That the Defendant, Richard Dionne, is an individual residing at 23 Gardner Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, who at all times material hereto was a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem. 11. That the Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 17 as it constitutes an appeal from the Decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem, a certified copy of said Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" 12. That on or about November 7, 2012, the Plaintiff, Bing Realty Trust, Stephen W. Haley, Trustee filed an "Application for Variance, or Other Relief' with the Board of Appeals of the City of Salem(see Application attached hereto marked for identification as Exhibit "B") requesting a "variance to amend a condition of an original variance dated March 27, 2003 allowing a dance studio to stay open until 9:00 p.m." 13. That the property is located in an BP Zoning District. 14. That a Public Hearing was held on December 19, 2012, after being advertised in The Salem News on December 5, 2012 and December 12, 2012. 15. That on December 19, 2012, the Board of Appeals on the application of the Plaintiff, Bing Realty Trust, Stephen W. Haley, Trustee, voted to deny an amendment to a previously granted Variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance as it applies to the premises known as 41 Mason Street, Salem, Massachusetts, as set forth in the Decision of the Board of Appeals of the City of Salem dated December 26,2012 and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Salem on January 2, 2013, a copy of which is attached hereto as set forth herein as Exhibit "A". 16. That the Decision of the City of Salem Board of Appeals failed to set forth any reasons upon which they could base a decision of the Board of Appeals in accordance with the criteria set forth in Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 10, which requires that the granting of variances be in substance as follows: "... to grant upon appeal or upon petition with respect to particular land or structures a variance from the terms of the applicable zoning ordinance or by-law where such permit granting authority specifically finds that owing to circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape, or topography of such land or structures and especially affecting such land or structures but not affecting generally the zoning district in which it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance or by-law would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner or appellant, and that the desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of such ordinance or by-law...". 17. That the Decision of the City of Salem Board of Appeals denying the variance cannot stand unless the Board specifically finds that the statutory requirement for hardship running with the land has not been met. 18. That the Decision of the Defendant, Zoning Board of Appeals, is inadequate on its face and fails to set forth sufficient grounds for the denial of the variance application. 19. That the Decision of the Defendant, Zoning Board of Appeals, exceeds the authority of the Board, is based on legally untenable grounds, is unreasonable, capricious and arbitrary. 20. That on January, CL, 2013, the Plaintiff gave notice of this appeal to the City Clerk of the City of Salem. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays: 1. That the Court hear the evidence and determine the facts and upon the facts so determined, order, decree and adjudge that the Defendant, Zoning Board of Appeals' Vote and Decision of December 26, 2012 is invalid, of no force or effect and that said Decision be annulled; 2. That the Court award the Plaintiffs their costs and attorney's fees in this action; and 3. For such other and further relief as this Honorable Court deems reasonable and just. Respectfully submitted, BING REALTY TRUST, STEPHEN W. HALEY,TRUSTEE By its attorney, i ohn R. eil squ' BBO #264360 40 Lowe treet Peabody, MA 01960 (978) 531-7900 Dated: January 2013 Exhibit "A" �bNo`T� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS hP BOARD OF APPEAL a ^ i t^�{�1 �11AeA Nt�' /� (�, r� ' y � 120 WASHING ION SIRLF"I'♦ S.V.LM,MASSNIIS l,[J 070 A IU 19 _�IlNED� 'IY:Le:978-619-5685 FAX:978-740-0404 KINIBERLGY DRISCOLL FILE #�t."O2 CITY CLERK, SALEM,MASS, December 26, 2012 Decision City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Petition of BING REALTY TRUST seeking to amend a previously issued Variance decision in order to change the allowed hours of operation of the dance studio located in the building on 41 MASON ST (NRCC). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on December 19, 2012 pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, § 11. The hearing was closed on December 19, 2012 with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair),Annie Harris, Michael Duffy, Richard Dionne,and Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate). Petitioner seeks to amend a Variance granted on March 19, 2003 for the property located at 41 Mason Street,Salem. Statements of fact: 1. In a decision date-stamped March 27, 2003, owner Stephen W. Haley received Variances from side and rear setbacks, parking and density requirements to construct an addition on the building located at 41 Mason Street. 2. A condition of issuance of the Variances was a restriction of the hours of operation of the building from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. In a petition date-stamped November 7, 2012,petitioner requested to amend the condition of the Variance restriction hours for the dance studio only, to allow it to stay open until 9:00 p.m. 4. Attorney John R. Keilty, 40 Lowell Street, represented the petitioner at the hearing. 5. At the hearing, several neighbors spoke against the petition, citing concerns about noise, traffic, parking and congestion on and around the site. 6. At the hearing, many students, parents and teachers from the dance studio spoke in support of the petition, saying that noise, parking and traffic issues were minimal, the studio was 1 surrounded by businesses as well as residences, and it served youth and the community in a positive way. The Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following findings: 1. While the existence of the dance studio was not problematic,relief to extend the hours of operation to 9:00 p.m. could not be granted either without detriment to the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance, since the expansion of the building in 2003 only occurred under the condition that business operations on the site be restricted to 6:00 p.m., and the Board finds that operations after this hour are disruptive to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted two (2) in favor(Dionne and Tsitsinos) and three (3) opposed (Curran, Harris and Duffy), to grant the requested amendment to the previously issued Variance. The petition is denied. Rebecca Curran, Chair Salem Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall he made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. 2 Exhibit "B" ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM n�n�rq/ CITY OF SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 1UI2 NOV —1 All: 09 SYS `, 4a5m ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3RD FLOOR FILE # SALEM,2vL9SSACHUSETTS01970 CITY CLERK, SALEM. MASS. a 3 a 9nN 4 s e„ Thomas St.Pierre,Director of Inspectional Services 6tMLYg pow t.978-619-5641/f.978-740-9846 ' -"- Danielle McKnight,Staff Planner t.978-619-5685/f.978-740-0404 TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at: Address:41 Mason Street, Salem, MA Zoning District: 216-0087-0-BP An application is being submitted to the Board of Appeal for the following reason(s): This statement must describe what you propose to build the dimensions,,the zone property is in, and the zoning requirements. Example., I am proposing to construct a 10'x 10'one story addition to my home located at 3 Salem Lane, in the R-2 Zoning District. The Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum depth of the rear yard to be 30 feet. The current depth of my rear yard is 32 feet;the proposed addition would reduce the depth of the rear yard to 22 feet. The Petitioner seeks to amend a decision of the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals granted on March 19, 2003 as it applies specifically to the hours of operation (Condition #11) so as to provide for amended hours of operation for Dance Enthusiasm, a dance studio being 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. For this reason I am requesting: ( )Variance(s)from provisions of Section of the Zoning Ordinance,specifically from I (i.e. minimum depth of rear yard). What is allowed is (ft?sgft?stories? %?), and what I am proposing is (ft?sqfl?stories? %?). ( )A Special Permit under Section of the Zoning Ordinance in order to ( )Appeal of the Decision of the Building Inspector(described below): The Current Use of the Property Is: Are the lot dimensions included on the plan? (example: Two Family Home) Lipht Commercial O Yes (>§No n/a because n0 re nest for Mixed Use dimensional retie The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms ofthe Salem Zoning Ordinance and allow the project to be constructed as per the plans submitted,as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PETMON FORM The following written statement has been submitted with this application: ( )For all Variance requests a written Statement of Hardship demonstrating the following must be attached: a) Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land,building,or structure involved, generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district; b) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involved substantial hardship to the applicant;and c) Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good,and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. ( )For all Special Permit requests a Statement of Grounds must be attached. An application for a special permit for a nonconforming use or structure shall include a statement demonstrating how the proposed change shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood in accordance with Art.V, §5-3. Such a statement should include reference to the following criteria: a) Social,economic,or community needs served by the proposal; b) Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading; c) Adequacy of utilities and other public services; d) Impacts on the natural environment, including drainage; e) Neighborhood character;and f) . Potential fiscal impact, including impact on City tax base and employment. Previous applications to the Board of Appeals involving this property have been submitted with this petition form. The Building Commissioner can provide documentation ofprevious applications to the petitioner or his representative. If different from petitioner: Petitioner: Bing Realty Trust Property Owner: "Same" Address: 43 Mason St., Salem, MA Address: Telephone:(781) 2 8-7895 Telephone: tgnamre Signature(Attached consent letter is also acceptable) November 1, 2012flV'K Date Date If different from peddoner: A TRUE Representative: John R. Keilty, Esq. ATTEST Address: 40 Lowell St., Peabody, MA Telephone:(978) 531-7900 Signature November 1, 2012 Date DATE SUBMITTED TO BOARD OF APPEALS: CITY CLERK This original application must be filed with the City Clerk. CITY OF SALEM, SACHUSETTS 1 � BUILDING DEPARTMENT 3, 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3" FLOOR TEL. (978) 745-9595 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAX(978) 740-9846 MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRE CTOR OF PUBLIC PROPE RTY/BUIMING COMMISSIONER August 1, 2012 _ BingRealty-Trust — --- —.. — — -- --- Att. Stephen Haley-Trustee 43 Mason Street Salem Ma. 01970 R.E Zoning Decision-41 Mason Street Dear Mr.Haley,This Department has received complaints and has been copied the zoning decision for 41 Mason Street heard back on March 19,2003.In this petition,relief was granted to construct an addition to the rear of 41 Mason Street. Several Standard conditions were recorded as well as conditions #8,#9,#10 and#11. Condition#11 stated that the hours of operation shall be between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. This condition is the subject of the complaint. Specifically the dance studio and the H.E.S group.. Therefore you are directed to cease and desist operations between the hours of 6:00 P.M and 7:00 A.M. If you feel you are aggrieved by my interpretation this order,your appeal is to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. Si erely Thomas St.Pierre cc. Att Robin Stein, Att. Mark Nestor i c • .. BOARD OF APPEAL•: . . �i� � ( � �{P` Ell, MA <- W..SH Ne TON STREET, 3RD FLOa. CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MA 01970 TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. MAYOR .1001 MAR 21 A 10: 41 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF STEPHEN W. HALEY REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 41 MASON STREET I A hearing on this petition was held March 19, 2003 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Nicholas Helides, Stephen Harris, Bonnie Belier and Joseph Barbeau. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting Variances from side and rear setbacks, parking and density requirements to construct an addition for the property located at 41 Mason Street located in an I zone. The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner Stephen Haley owns and operates Crown Auto Supply, a wholesale auto parts business located at 45 Mason Street adjacent to the subject property. Several other businesses also operate at the 45 Mason Street property, and Mr. Haley currently holds a license to offers used cars for sale at 43 Mason Street, 2. Petitioner seeks to renovate a former tannery building at 41 Mason Street for commercial and light industrial use. The existing structure is nonconforming as to minimum lot area, frontage, front and side yard setbacks, and it does not offer sufficient off street parking to meet the requirements of the ordinance for commercial or industrial use. 3. Architect Richard Griffin of 37 Turner Street, Salem, detailed the proposed renovation. A three story wood structure at the Mason St. property line is unsound and it will be demolished A single story brick structure behind the wood DECISION OF THE PETITION OF STEPHEN HALELY REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 41 MASON STREET i page two structure has been gutted and cleaned; it has been determined to be free of contamination arising from its former use. Mr. Haley proposes to construct commercial offices within the existing walls of the brick building and to create a new single story addition on the southeast corner of the property. The new space will be used for his existing business and for other commercial uses consistent with the business now operating in the adjacent properties. The new addition will have a 2- foot setback and a rear setback of 2 feet. The new space will be used for this existing business and for other commercial uses consistent with businesses now operating in the adjacent properties. 4. Ward 5 City Councillor Mike Bencal reported that Mr. Haley met with neighbors in July 2002 to explain the project, and that the neighborhood was in favor of granting The variances. Eric Easley of 35 also voiced support for Mr. Haley's project Mason Street and Arthur Parent of 39 Mason Street. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the District. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0 to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per plans submitted and approved by the Building Commissioner. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6, Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Inspection. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF STEPHEN HALEY REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 41 MASON STREET I page three 7. Petitioner shall obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including but not limited to the Planning Board. 8. No neon signs are to be used. 9. There shall be no outside storage. 10. There shall be no automotive repairs. 11. Hours of operation shall be between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. VARIANCE GRANTED MARCH 19, 2003 Nina Cohen, Chairman Cs c'�� Board of Appeal A COPY OF.THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CIITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 day date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal I Eagle - Tribune Salem News Newburyport Daily News Gloucester Times REQUEST FOR LEGAL NOTICE I understand that by signing this form I am agreeing to the cost of the legal notice to be published in the newspaper. Payment is required at the time of the legal notice received by the city. Please make checks payable to the paper that will be publishing the legal notice. **Average legal notice costs are estimated. "Customer will either be refunded or billed when the legal notice is published. Eagle Tribune Paper=$200.00 per day Essex County Papers =$250.00 per day Check# Q 1 r17-73 Credit Card (please call with the credit card information to the person receiving the legal notice at our paper) Signed App nt/AuthFrzed, Agent Date Print Name __ Z�t Address Oxa is uLog. Jl�r¢01571p0 ( Phone — - 79W COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. BING REALTY TRUST, STEPHEN, ) W. HALEY, TRUSTEE, ) Plaintiffs ) vs. ) REBECCA CURRAN,JAMIE METSCH, ) ANNIE HARRIS, MICHAEL DUFFY, ) BONNIE BELAIR,JIMMY TSITSINOS and ) RICHARD DIONNE, as they constitute the ) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE ) CITY OF SALEM, ) Defendants ) AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE NOW COMES,John R.Keilty,Esquire of 40 Lowell Street,Peabody,Massachusetts 01960 who states as follows: 1. That I am the attorney of record for the Plaintiff,Bing Realty Trust,Stephen w.Haley, Trustee, in the above-entitled matter. 2. That on January j9_1 2013, a Notice of Appeal and a copy of the Complaint filed with the Superior Court Department, Essex Division,was filed with the City Clerk's Office for the City of Salem,Massachusetts. A copy of said Notice of Appeal and Complaint,stamped as received by the City of Salem Clerk's Office, is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 3. That the Clerk's Office for the City of Salem,Massachusetts,has been put on notice of said appeal. a i Signed under the penalties of perjury this— 9—day of January, 2013. John-R £eilty, uire BO #264360 �40 Lowell Street Peabody, MA OIVO (978) 531-7900 Dated: January , 2013 i TRIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS FNTTI VER SHEET SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENTDOCKET NO. I.3 ' 9� COUNTY ESSEX OF NG REALTY TRUST, STEPHE REBECCA CURRAN, ET ALS AS THEY HALEY, TRUSTEE DEFENDANT(S)CONSTITUTE THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SALEM Type Plaintiffs Attorney name,Address,City/State/Zip Type Defendant's Attorney Name, Address, City/State/Zip Phone Number and BBO# Phone Number(If Known) John R. Keilty, Esquire (978) 531-7900 Elizabeth M. Rennard, Esquire (978) 745-9595 Salem City Hall 40 Lowell Street 93 Washington Street Peabody, MA 01960 Salem, MA 01970 BSO#26436 D TYPE OF ACTION AND TRACK DESIGNATION(See reverse side) CODE NO. TYPE OF ACTION(specify) TRACK IS THIS A JURY CASE? CO2 Zoning Appeal G L c 40A - Fast Track I Yes (9 I No The following is a full, itemized and detailed statement of the facts on which plaintiff relies to determine money damages. For this form,disregard double or treble damage claims; indicate single damages only. i i' 4 TORT CLAIMS (Attach additional sheets as necessary) A. Documented medical expenses to date: 1. Total hospital expenses $ 2. Total doctor expenses $ 3. Total chiropractic expenses $ 4. Total physical therap expenses $ 5. Total other expenses describe) $ B. Documented lost wages and compensation to date Subtotal $$ C. Documented property damages to date $ D. Reasonably anticipated future medical expenses $ E. Reasonably anticipated lost wgges and compensation to date $ F. Other documented items of damages (describe) G. Brief description of plaintiffs injury,including nature and extent of injury (describe) Total$ CONTRACT CLAIMS (Attach additional sheets as necessary) Provide a detailed description of claim(s): Not Applicable TOTAL $............... PLEASE IDENTIFY,BY CASE NUMBER,NAME AND COUNTY,ANY RELATED ACTION PENDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT Not Applicable "I hereby certify that I have complied with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Supreme Judicial Court Uniform Rules on Dispute Resolution(SJC Rule 1:18)requiring that 1 provide my cligrlywith information about court-connected dispute resolution services and discuss with them the advantages and disadvantages of the var o an hods' Signature of Attorney of Recor ! Date: January ,2013 A.O.S.C.3-2007 CIVIL ACTION COVER SHEET INSTRUCTIONS SELECT CATEGORY THAT BEST DESCRIBES YOUR CASE * CONTRACTS . REAL PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS A01 Services,Labor and Materials F) C01 Land Taking(eminent domain) (F) E02 Appeal from Administrative A02 Goods Sold and Delivered (F) CO2 Zoning Appeal,G.L.c.40A (F) Agency G.L.c.30A (X) A03 Commercial Paper (F) CO3 Dispute concerning title (FI E03 Claims against Commonwealth A08 Sale or Lease of Real Estate (F) C04 Foreclosure of mortgage (X) Cl Municipality (q) Al2 Construction Dispute (A) C05 Condominium Lien&Charges (X) E05 Confirmation of Arbitration AwardsX A99 Other(Specify) (F) C99 Other(Specify) (F) Awards (X) E07 G.L. (Mary Moe) (X) E03 Claims against Commonwealth (A) E03 Claims against Commonwealth JA) E08 Appointment of of Receiver (X) or Municipality or Municipality E09 General Contractor bond, EQUITABLE REMEDIES G.L.c.149,as.29,29a (A) 'TORT D01 Specific Performance of Contract (A) Ell Worker's Compensation (X) B03 Motor Vehicle Negligence (F) D02 Reach and Apply (F) E12 G.L.c.123A,s.12(SDP Commitment) (X) personal injury/property damage D06 Contribution or Indemnification (F) E14 G.L.c.123A,s.9(SDP Petition) 804 Other Negligence- (F) D07 Imposition of a Trust (A) E15 Abuse Petition,G.L.c.209A (X) personal Injury/property damage D08 Minority Stockholder's Suit (A) E16 Auto Surcharge Appeal (X) B05 Products LiabilityD10 Accounting (A) (A) D12 Dissolution of Partnership (F) E17 Civil Rights Act,G.L.c.12,s.11 H (A) B06 Malpractice-Medical (A) D13 Declaratory Judgment G.L.c.231A (A) E18 Foreign Discovery Proceeding (X) 607,1111alprectice-Other(Specify) (A) D99 Other(Specify) (F) E19 Sex Offender Registry G.L.c.178M, 808 Wrongful Death,G.L.c.229,s.2A(A) S.6 (X) B15 Defamation(Libel-Slander) (A) E25 Plural Registry(Asbestos cases) B19 Asbestos (A) E95 "Forfeiture G.L.C.94C,s.47 (F) 820 Personal Injury.slip&fall (F) E96 Prisoner Cases (F) 021 Environmental (F) E97 Prisoner Habeas Corpus (X) B22 Employment Discrimination (F) E99 Other(Specify) (X) B99 Other(Specify) (F) E03 Claims against Commonwealth (A) i 'Claims against the Commonwealth or a municipality are type E03, Average Track, cases. "Claims filed by the Commonwealth pursuant to G L c 94C, s 47 Forfeiture cases are type E95, Fast track. r' j, TRANSFER YOUR SELECTION TO THE FACE SHEET. i+ EXAMPLE: ;t �y CODE NO. TYPE OF ACTION(SPECIFY) TRACK IS THIS A JURY CASE? Ie B03 Motor Vehicle Negligence-Personal Injury (F) I X j Yes I I ttr 1 SUPERIOR COURT RULE 29 DUTY OF THE PLAINTIFF.The plaintiff or his/her counsel shall set forth,on the face sheet(or attach additional sheets as necessary),a statement specifying in full and itemized detail the facts upon which the plaintiff then relies as constituting money damages.A copy of such civil action cover sheet,including the statement as to the damages,shall be served on the defendant together with the complaint.If a statement of money damages,where appropriate is not filed,the Clerk-Magistrate shall transfer the action as provided in Rule 29(5)(C). DUTY OF THE DEFENDANT.Should the defendant believe the statement of damages filed by the plaintiff in any respect inadequate,he or his counsel may file with the answer a statement specifying in reasonable detail the potential damages which may result should the plaintiff prevail.Such statement,if any,shall be served with the answer. A CIVIL ACTION COVER SHEET MUST BE FILED WITH EACH COMPLAINT. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS COVER SHEET THOROUGHLY AND ACCURATELY MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION, NDfT CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL �7 q 17 '�1 �l 1, 1 ��q ® 120 WASHINGTON STREET+SALEM,MASsA41Is�O on?o A ID 1 9 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FILE MAYOR CITY CLERK. SALEM, MASS. December 26, 2012 Decision City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Petition of BING REALTY TRUST seeking to amend a previously issued Variance decision in order to change the allowed hours of operation of the dance studio located in the building on 41 MASON ST (NRCC). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on December 19, 2012 pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, § 11. The hearing was closed on December 19, 2012 with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair),Annie Harris, Michael Duffy, Richard Dionne,and Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate). Petitioner seeks to amend a Variance granted on March 19, 2003 for the property located at 41 Mason Street, Salem. Statements of fact: 1. In a decision date-stamped March 27, 2003, owner Stephen W. Haley received Variances from side and rear setbacks, parking and density requirements to construct an addition on the building located at 41 Mason Street. 2. A condition of issuance of the Variances was a restriction of the hours of operation of the building from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. In a petition date-stamped November 7, 2012, petitioner requested to amend the condition of the Variance restriction hours for the dance studio only, to allow it to stay open until 9:00 p.m. 4. Attorney John R. Keilty, 40 Lowell Street,represented the petitioner at the hearing. 5. At the hearing, several neighbors spoke against the petition, citing concerns about noise, traffic, parking and congestion on and around the site. 6. At the hearing, many students,parents and teachers from the dance studio spoke in support of the petition, saying that noise, parking and traffic issues were minimal, the studio was 1 surrounded by businesses as well as residences, and it served youth and the community in a positive way. The Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following findings: 1. While the existence of the dance studio was not problematic, relief to extend the hours of operation to 9:00 p.m. could not be granted either without detriment to the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance, since the expansion of the building in 2003 only occurred under the condition that business operations on the site be restricted to 6:00 p.m., and the Board fords that operations after this hour are disruptive to the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted two (2) in favor (Dionne and Tsitsinos) and three (3) opposed (Curran, Harris and Duffy), to grant the requested amendment to the previously issued Variance. AThe petition is denied. Rebecca Curran, Chair Salem Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. 2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM � �oeotrl� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 1012 NOV -1 A 111 I)q v ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 120 WASHINGTON STREET,31tD FLOOR FILL # SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 CITY CLERK, SALEM, PLASS: < � Thomas St.Pierre,Director of Inspectional Services ��'GlgfAliS LtO t.978-619-5641/f.978-740-9846 - -- Danielle McKnight,Staff Planner t.978-619-5685/f.978-740-0404 TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at: Address:41 Mason Street, Salem, MA Zoning District: 216-0087-0-BP An application is being submitted to the Board of Appeal for the following reason(s): This statement must describe what you propose to build, the dimensions, the zone property is in, and the zoning requirements. Example. I am proposing to construct a 10'x 10'one story addition to my home located at 3 Salem Lane, in the R-2 Zoning District. The Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum depth of the rear yard to be 30 feet. The current depth of my rear yard is 32 feet; the proposed addition would reduce the depth of the rear yard to 22 feet. The Petitioner seeks to amend a decision of the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals granted on March 19, 2003 as it applies specifically to the hours of operation (Condition #11) so as to provide for amended hours of operation for Dance Enthusiasm, a dance studio being 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. For this reason I am requesting: O Variance(s)from provisions of Section of the Zoning Ordinance,specifically from (i.e. minimum depth of rear yard). What is allowed is (ft?sq ft?stories? %?), and what I am proposing is. (ft?sq ft?stories?%?). O A Special Permit under Section of the Zoning Ordinance in order to ( )Appeal of the Decision of the Building Inspector(described below): The Current Use of the Property Is: Are the lot dimensions included on the plan? (example: Two Family Home) Light Commercial O Yes ()�No n/a because no request for Mixed Use dimensional relief - The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and,allow the project to be constructed as per the plans submitted,as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM The following written statement has been submitted with this application: ( )For all Variance requests a written Statement of Hardship demonstrating the following must be attached: a) Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land,building,or structure involved, generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district; b) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involved substantial hardship to the applicant;and c) Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good,and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. O For all Special Permit requests a Statement of Grounds must be attached. An application for a special permit for a nonconforming use or structure shall include a statement demonstrating how the proposed change shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood in accordance with Art.V, §5-3. Such a statement should include reference to the following criteria: a) Social,economic,or community needs served by the proposal; b) Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading; - c) Adequacy of utilities and other public services; d) Impacts on the natural environment,including drainage; e) Neighborhood character;and f) Potential fiscal impact,including impact on City tax base and employment. Previous applications to the Board of Appeals involving this property have been submitted with this petition form. The Building Commissioner can provide documentation ofprevious applications to the petitioner or his representative. If different from petitioner: Petitioner: Bing Realty Trust Property Owner: Same" - Address: 43 Mason St., Salem, MA Address: Telephone•(781) 2 8-7895 Telephone: ignature Signature(Attached consent letter is also acceptable) November 1, 2012 Date Date If different from petitioner: A TRUE Representative: John R. Keilty, Esq. ATTEST Address: 40 Lowell St., Peabody, MA Telephone:(978) 531-7900 Signature November 1, 2012 Date DATE SUBMITTED TO BOARD OF APPEALS: CITY CLERK This original application must be filed with the City Clerk. Joseph&Silvana White � j 37 Mason Street Q n Salem,MApj April 2,2013 � ApUNO p `CJP,C Rebecca Curran cA, Chair Salem Board of Appeals 120 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 Dear Ms.Curran: - I've tried to contact City Hall several times;however it has proved to be unsuccessful.Please be advised this is not the first time we have not heard back from City Hall.This brings me to the issue at hand. On March 19,2003 the Zoning Board of Appeals issued a variance for the property located at 41 Mason Street. This Variance restricted hours of operation of the businesses on the premises from 7:OOa.m.To 6:OOpm. I have enclosed the meeting minutes for your review. The hours of operation run beyond said hours,this ongoing issue was brought to the attention of City Hall on many occasions. With that being said,I was forced to hire a private attorney back on July 2012,to file a Cease and Desist order on the property. As a taxpaying citizen I do not feel that it should be my obligation to enforce a Variance that was clearly documented by the City of Salem. Nothing was being done to enforce said restrictions,until my attorney was involved. We then attended two separate hearings where a decision was made that the hours needed to remain 7:OOam-6:OOpm.To this date the Variance is still not being adhered to.One building remains open 24hrs and the other building until 9:OOpm. Both these facilities are disruptive to the neighborhood not to mention potentially dangerous where the Behavioral center is concerned,having small children this concerns me greatly. I will not even let my children in the backyard since the Behavioral center is directly behind my home. I now owe a private attorney over$1,700.00 for something that the City of Salem should have enforced,I am asking that this bill be paid by the City of Salem,seeing as how this is something the City should have corrected a long time ago,had my calls been returned or my concerns heard. In addition I have attached the schedule for Dance Enthusiasm,and the fees I incurred from my attorney. icerely, Silvana White LAW OFFICES ATTORNEY MARK L. NESTOR Putnam Place Business Center 45 Middle Street,Suite 1 180 Boulder Drive,Suite 150 P.O. Box 5357 Fitchburg,MA 01420 Gloucester, MA 01930 (978) 345-3544 (978) 283-7117 Facsimile (978) 345-8034 Facsimile (978) 283-5118 Email:nestorlaw(a)aoLcom Direct all correspondence to the Gloucester Office SILVANA WHITE 37 MASON STREET SALEM, MA 01970 ITEMIZED BILL LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED IN REGARDS TO CITY OF SALEM 7/16/12 - REVIEW DOCUMENTS . 5HRS 7/19/12 - LETTER TO CITY SOLICITOR . 4HRS 7/23/12 - REVIEW AND RESPOND TO EMAIL . 3HRS 7/27/12 - LTR & DOCS TO BLDG INSPECTOR . 4HRS 8/03/12 - LTR & DOCS TO CLIENT . 3HRS 8/22/12 - LTR TO BUILDING INSPECTOR . 3HRS 8/29/12 - LTR & DOCUMENTS TO CLIENT . 3HRS 9/18/12 - LTR & DOCUMENTS TO CLIENT . 3HRS 11/2/12 - LTR AND DOCUMENTS TO CLIENT . 3HRS 11/7/12 - ZBA HEARING 2 . OHRS 11/9/12 - LTR & DOCS TO CITY INSPECTOR . 3HRS 12/19/12- ZBA HEARING 1. 5HRS TOTAL HRS 6. 9HRS 6. 9HRS @$250/HR tTOTAL;S1';_72_ 5:00 TOTAL DUE $1, 725. 00 LESS RETAINER 7 . 30 . 12 $ 250 . 00 LESS PAYMENT 12 . 17 . 12 $ 200 . 00 BALANCE DUE $1, 275 . 00 JANUARY 2, 2013 Kathleen Zolla P0Box 5 Boxford, MA 01921 978-887-8567 December 17, 2012 Rebecca Curran, Chair City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms Curran: I am writing in support of Bing Realty Trust's petition 'seeking to amend a previously issued Variance decision in order to change the allowed hours of operation of the dance studio located in the building at 41 Mason Street(NRCC)'. The very nature of a dance studio is such that the hours of operation begin in the mid-afternoon on weekdays and run into the evening hours in order to serve various age groups, a large number of students and the numerous styles of dance students wish to learn. Dance, in the structured environment of dance instruction in the studio, as in organized sports, provides the children and teens of Salem and surrounding communities a safe place to gather and to learn in a supervised, social setting. It is not unusual for any child or teen to be involved in numerous after school activities. Because of this it is often necessary for businesses, regardless of the activity, to offer instruction and activities during extended evening hours. It seems a shame that the co-directors of this studio will have to consider closing their doors or relocating the studio should their hours be curtailed. As the parent of two daughters who have attended classes at Dance Enthusiasm for a number of years, I would ask that the Zoning Board of Appeals think about the disruption to dance students during this current dance year as well as the financial ramifications to the dance studio. Please consider an amendment to the previously issued Variance of March 2003 allowing for extended hours of operation of the dance studio at 41 Mason Street. Sincerely, Kathleen Zolla I `19V �,�� J"(5- QTY l�IhS CITY OF SALEM, SAC HUSETTS f b�� BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3 FLOOR 'I;rL. (978) 745-9595 FAX(978) 740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISGOLL MAYOR THOMAS STTIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER August 1, 2012 Art. Stephen Haley-Trustee 43 Mason Street Salem Ma. 01970 R.E Zoning Decision-41 Mason Street Dear Mr.Haley,This Department has received complaints and has been copied the zoning decision for 41 Mason Street heard back on March 19,2003.In this petition,relief was granted to construct an addition to the rear of 41 Mason Street. Several Standard conditions were recorded as well as conditions#8,#9,#10 and#11. Condition#11 stated that the hours of operation shall be between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. This condition is the subject of the complaint. Specifically the dance studio and the H.E.S group.. Therefore you are directed to cease and desist operations between the hours of 6:00 P.M and 7:00 A.M. If you feel you are aggrieved by my interpretation this order,younappeal is to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. Si erely Thomas St.Pierre cc. Att Robin Stein, Att. Mark Nestor