Loading...
9 LOCUST STREET - ZBA � LocvS� S1�ee {-- iversal® www.muniversalop.com phonZ1-866756.4676 UNV12113 MADE IN USA r f r NA ZoningBoard Proiect Status Sheet Address & Applicant: Date Submitted to BOA: SJz� I i E( Clerk Stamp: Variances Only - Constructive Approval Date: (100 days fi-on, riling) Ed Abutters List Requested: i/ Abutters Notice Sent: Notice to Abutting Cities & Towns, Councillors: Legal Noticeosted at City p Hall: I4 days before meeting) n Legal Notice Emailed & Confirmed: Legal Notice Posted on Web: 0 Agenda to Applicant: Applicant's email address or fax number to send agenda: Opened at Meeting: l9 l Continued Meetings: Extension Form(s) Signed & Clerk Stamped? Closed at Meeting: (� S Decision: w -V-vA awv-) wCo Pce-,SU C e Decision Filed: cn 2 Appeal Period Over: alter decision (tiled) (21"'day ta' Decision Sent to Applicant: G/ g/, & cr/Notice of Decision Sent to abutters, cities and towns, councillors: ZBA ACTION FORM Date: (0/1 S I (o Rebecca Curran Chair y Mike Du y Petitioner: Tom Watkins Peter Co elas y Address: Jimm Tsitsinos J c er Conditions: w� d�4vJ �i1 Total: $—p to P�e�vd�c -e ❑Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. ❑All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. ❑All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. ❑Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. ❑Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. ❑A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. ❑A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. ❑Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. ❑Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to,the Planning Board. ❑Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise,any zoning relief granted does not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the structure(s)located on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty percent(50%)of its floor area or more than fifty percent(50%)of its replacement cost at the time of destruction. If the structure is demolished by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent(50%)of its replacement cost or more than fifty percent(501/o)of its floor area at the time of destruction,it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance. ❑ ��coNU1T ,. .34 CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS +. + ?mi BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦SALEM,MASSAC 5 KIMBERLEYDRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9H 4466�I �Q A I S 8 MAYOR P'LF. CITY CLE(',K, June 29, 201 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of ANNETTE POPP seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for minimum depth of front yard and side yard setbacks to allow two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry located at 9 LOCUST STREET (Map 28 Lot 14) (Rl Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 15, 2016 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, § 11 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran (Chau), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas,Mr. Watkins, and Mr. Tsitsinos. The Petitioner seeks a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for minimum depth of front yard and side yard setbacks to allow two (2') 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry. Statements of fact: 1. Annette Popp,petitioner,presents the petition. 2. In the petition date-stamped May 23, 2016 the Petitioner requested a Variance per Sec. 4.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for minimum depth of front yard and side yard setbacks to allow two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry. 3. The petitioner proposes to construct two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry. One (1) of the two (2) proposed side additions is within 8.4' feet of the side yard lot line where ten (10') is required. 4. The petitioner proposes to also construct an extended enclosed front entryway within 9.6' feet of the front yard lot line where fifteen (15') feet is required. 5. The property is a single family home located in an RI zoning district. 6. The petitioner states that one (1) of the additions will be used as a hobby workshop, but not intended to be used as a business. 7. The petitioner testified that the angle of the buildable area causes a hardship as it is not a 90 degree angle and therefore one (1) of the additions is within the side yard setback. 8. The petitioner testified that the statement of hardship for the Variance requested for the extended front entryway is that the house could not be pulled back. The extended front entryway is to provide more convenience and space,which cannot be addressed any other way. 9. The Board stated that the petitioner could pull back the proposed additions to meet the side yard setbacks and the personal hardship for the variance requests do not meet the threshold for a variance. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project: 9 Locust Street Page 2 of 2 10. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to construct one (1) of two (2) proposed side additions within 8.4' feet of the side yard lot line and an enclosed front entry within 9.6' feet where 15' feet is required. 11. At the public hearing no (0) members of the public spoke in favor of, and four (4) members spoke in opposition to, the petition. 12. The petitioner requested to withdraw the petition without prejudice. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy,Mr. Copelas, Mr. Watkins, and Mr. Tsitsinos) and none (0) opposed, to allow the petitioner to withdraw the application without prejudice. WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PRE-1UDICE IC iC•�-Z��l—bt G(..tltJt�O�ri/7� Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal fmm this deasion, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Lams Chapter 40A, and.shall be filed=then 20 days of filing of this deciaon in the office of the City Clerk Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Lams Cbapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a mpy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been frled w1b the Essex South Registry of Deedr. v��cONDIT,��i: 1n � CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL \9�I!'IINE U9�'• -- 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUWSjW72q A 8: .1 5 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 MAYOR CITY CLU-Ik, `..i_! 'i, M °;c>S June 29, 2016 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of ANNETTE POPP seeking a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for minimum depth of front yard and side yard setbacks to allow two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry located at 9 LOCUST STREET (Map 28 Lot 14) (R1 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 15, 2016 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, g 11 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy,Mr. Copelas, Mr. Watkins, and Mr. Tsitsinos. The Petitioner seeks a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 4.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for minimum depth of front yard and side yard setbacks to allow two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry. Statements of fact: 1. Annette Popp,petitioner,presents the petition. 2. In the petition date-stamped May 23, 2016 the Petitioner requested a Variance per Sec. 4.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for minimum depth of front yard and side yard setbacks to allow two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry. 3. The petitioner proposes to construct two (2) 12' side additions and an enclosed front entry. One (1) of the two (2) proposed side additions is within 8.4' feet of the side yard lot line where ten (10') is required. 4. The petitioner proposes to also construct an extended enclosed front entryway within 9.6' feet of the front yard lot line where fifteen (15') feet is required. 5. The property is a single family home located in an R1 zoning district. 6. The petitioner states that one (1) of the additions will be used as a hobby workshop,but not intended to be used as a business. 7. The petitioner testified that the angle of the buildable area causes a hardship as it is not a 90 degree angle and therefore one (1) of the additions is within the side yard setback. 8. The petitioner testified that the statement of hardship for the Variance requested for the extended front entryway is that the house could not be pulled back. The extended front entryway is to provide more convenience and space,which cannot be addressed any other way. 9. The Board stated that the petitioner could pull back the proposed additions to meet the side yard setbacks and the personal hardship for the variance requests do not meet the threshold for a variance. a City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project: 9 Locust Street Page 2 oft 10. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to construct one (1) of two (2) proposed side additions within 8.4' feet of the side yard lot line and an enclosed front entry within 9.6' feet where 15' feet is required. 11. At the public hearing no (0) members of the public spoke in favor of, and four (4) members spoke in opposition to, the petition. 12. The petitioner requested to withdraw the petition without prejudice. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy,Mr. Copelas, Mr. Watkins, and Mr. Tsitsinos) and none (0) opposed, to allow the petitioner to withdraw the application without prejudice. WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appea!from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of fil'ng of this deanon in the ofice of the City Clerk Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM CITY OF SALEM,MASSACHUSETTSC , n" rABOARD OF APPEALS 120 WASHINGTON STREET,San FLOOR tRtAY 2 3 2016 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 �E' 116EPT. OF PLW%INP S Thomas St.Pierre,Director of Inspectional Services r9 Phone:978-619-5641 /Fax:978-740-9846 CCAIMUN�Zy t7EvtLUrmi_­NT -G o_ KimBERLEY DRISCOLL Elfin Schaeffer,Staff Planner M c MAYOR Phone:978-619-5685/ Fax:978-740-0404 '- s. N TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: n W r.. The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at: 1I -r Address: 01 LOCUST STQ-tel" Zoning District: An application is being submitted to the Board of Appeal for the following reason(s):This statement mhst describe what you propose to build,the dimensions,the zone property is in,and the zoning requirements.(Example: I am proposing to construct a 10'x 10'one story addition to my home located at 3 Salem Lane, in the R-2 Zoning p District. The Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum depth of the rear yard to be 30 feet. The current depth of my i rear yard is 32 feet; the proposed addition would reduce the depth of the rear yard to 12 feet.) 1 At'1 PVAP05IN6. TD CONST"Ci" TWO 12' SIDE AM11ONS ?tNV " lE7NQ,OWV EnONT- E'NM4 TO M`I ItOMF NT OI L0005T Sro, I N "'C 2-1 'MSWA Or. TtE 'Prov PM-0 -PcM 1'n6'1-1 et J TUC �51C)E WODU0 mmiGE me S-*_ bNNC/. TD &`E' � ICJt tLEQU111�D� , 1 ht,m rA-e fyjtN'�- ko-V1TLO7V WOU1.17 atyS io Tntlr" GIETb AIX' — TO 9 6' � IS' Uk7GLQ1CL+:" 0) . For this reason I am requesting: ( )Variance(s) from provisions of Section 4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance,specifically from M IN . DEPT ©f :Frmt-7T $t SIVE %fiftmy (i.e.minimum depth of rear yard). What is allowed is 10' SIDE 15' FIZ O NT (ft?sq ft?stories? %?), and what I am proposing is 8 4' S IVE a-O' hw W T(ft?sq ft?stories?%?). (�ELI� t5 (LEQ'Je5T 10 I t3fL GiOTIt StO+ 1 fK Wl7ropu( iO Su�Vt I� ( ) A Special Permit under Section of the Zoning Ordinance in order to ( )Appeal of the Decision of the Building Inspector(described below): ( )Comprehensive Permit for construction of low or moderate income housing(describe below): Ols 1 Current Property Use: Are Lot Dimensions Included?('F)Yes ( )No Why? (Example:Two Family Home) The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and allow the project to be constructed as per the plans submitted,as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. d � CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM The following written statement has been submitted with this application: ( ) For all Variance requests a written Statement of Hardship demonstrating the following must be attached: a) Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land,building,or structure involved, generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district; b) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involved substantial hardship to the . applicant;and c) Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good,and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. O For all Special Permit requests a Statement of Grounds must be attached.An application for a special permit for a nonconforming use or structure shall include a statement demonstrating how the proposed change shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood in accordance with Section 9.4 Special Permits. Such a statement should include reference to the following criteria: I Ili a) Social,economic,or community needs served by the proposal; b) Traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading; c) Adequacy of utilities and other public services; III d) Impacts on the natural environment,including drainage; e) Neighborhood character;and f) Potential fiscal impact,including impact on City tax base and employment. ( ) For all Comprehensive Permits for construction of low or moderate income applicants should refer.to M.G.L. Ch.40B §20-23. Previous applications to the Board of Appeals involving this property have been submitted with this petition , form. The Building Commissioner can provide documentation ofprevious applications to the petitioner or his representative. If different from petitioner: Petitioner: k(W N�T CE P� Property Owner: Address: 01 LO(,U$r ST Address: Telephone: 0116 4275 110101 Telephone: Email: A NVXW e h Email: Signature: (::)-Ali—l AFL/ Signature: (Attached consent letter is also acceptable) Date: 70(fo Date: If different from petitioner: Representative: Address: A TRUE ATTEST Telephone: Signature: Date: CITY CLERK DATE DPCD DATE This original application must befiled with the City Clerk. e - e e e e e e e 0 May 23, 2016 e E U ZBA Petition Statement 0 City of Salem, MA Board of Appeals 120 Washington Street ca Salem MA 01970 m As described on the attached plans, I am proposing to add two 12' side additions and a front i addition to my home at 9 Locust Street in Salem, MA, Zoning District R-1. } The existing lot frontage is 87.67', however the zoning ordinance requires 100'. m Required side setbacks are 10', however the proposed south addition would reduce this setback to 8.4' on the front end of the addition. The proposed north addition scales to be inside the setback, rn however the survey indicates 9' +/-, therefore relief is requested for that side setback as well. The rn rear end of the addition is inside the required setback. I vWhen planning commenced, the property was assumed to be square and no setback violation was p6 expected. However, the survey revealed an angle other than 90 degrees and therefore shifted a rn sliver of one of the additions into the required setback. I am requesting relief due to the geometry ai hardship this condition presents. Access to the rear yard is still available. C O n The proposed new front entry would enclose the existing landing and create a vestibule to the home. Currently, the front of the property sits exactly on the setback line of 15', however, the curb is located 9' beyond that line, providing sufficient open space. 0 rn None of the additions would create a detriment to the public good, or present safety hazards. r 0 < The drawings were presented to the neighbors. E m Sincerely N o0 Annette Popp O7 POPP/TALBOT RESIDENCE �b`. .a�o , III . �m�sm 9 Locust Street 5= 3X , Salem MA 01970 Sheet Number Sheet Name �s fssv� �J/� yl A0.0 COVER SHEET t� I� J�1�I ✓ A0.2 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS A0.3 EXISTING SITE PLAN A0.4 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A0.5 AREA PLANS �I��t A1.0 DEMOLITION FLOOR PLANS�'V A1.1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL A1.2 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.3 FURNITURE PLANS A1.5 FINISH PLANS A1.9 ROOF PLAN ISOMETRIC VIEW 1 A2.0 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LOWER LEVEL �I AL1; r I�is A2A REFLECTED CEILING PLAN UPPER LEVEL A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.0 BUILDING SECTION jay,', A4.1 BUILDING SECTION iy+ � .a�ti, A4.2 BUILDING SECTION A4.3 WALL SECTION s A5.0 SCHEDULES A5.1 SYSTEMS SiS 5 -in" A5.2 AC SYSTEM A6.0 KITCHEN PLANS AND ELEVATIONS s<''ss'•s"{ssi, h',s' %s�""s'" %s:;'is�"s„ r A6.1 BATHROOM PLANS AND ELEVATIONS f ssss �s s �, s 5 54u�sy �s A6.2 INT.ELEVATIONS - tssrss`s A6.3 WORKSHOP PLAN AND ISOMETRIC �. \ s ss}ss <ss s�.frss lsi s?�s ss A6.4 WORKSHOP ELEVATIONS A6.5 WORKSHOP RCP _ s .,s- sn srs' si'3zs Ss4 j A6.6 WORKSHOP SECTIONS A9.0 ISOMETRIC VIEWS A9.1 ISOMETRIC VIEWS Grand total:33 POPPrrALBOT ''s s !� �• " ,j � �� RESIDENCE AA IUI ; I 5, , VIII II � IIf �I RECEIVED �� I ilil 111 illi� � ' .II%I�I�IiIiiIJ ,,.o \ 14 iii i�I i llih /I%y�y�� 1�t�iY 2 3 Z'16 II I , II / II �I �� T� `T DEPT. OF PL ��!fJINC & cove6 seEer /oI ISOMETRIC VIEW REAR � ��I�� �I ill � A• COMMUNITY DEVELC;F,', ENT A0.0 M.eN Nq 1EED 8409sr LIA EXISTING I� PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET - n PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET-EXISTING 3 EXISTING l'J Ji e p� •4 � � I.. � � 111 � Q PROPOSED U PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET 2 PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET POPP/TALBOT RESIDENCE s PERSPECTIVE VIEWS A0.2 OQ y W• �q�� a,.b> .,�o ❑ sro ' o \, LU o 0 ri � a a /� .\ \ \ n 1 O p \ \ E70 \ Sh / \ \ ,II /� / � SP A•/ 1 ; sFb F 0 M a / 7,1 POPPrrALBOT p \ \ ` \ \ RESIDENCE \ \ Lem mawem p g "a 1 SITE EXISTING EXISTING SITE PLAN A0.3 ZONING SUMMARY ZONING DESIGNATION:RESIDENTIAL ONE FAMILY(R1) L /MIN LOTFRONTAGE.100' EXISTING:eI'8' > woo �e MINL LOT WIDTH:100' EXISTING:el'"8' n�wom� OVERAGE BY ALL BUILDINGS:30% 2336 SF ALLOWED,2338 SF PROPOSED (� 'HOF FRONT YARD:15' PROPOSED:9'.6' / ^u4S H OF SI DE YARD:lU PROPOSED.8.4 1 .5 H OF REAR YARD'.39 PROPOSED:30 t/- �y HT OF BUILDINGS:35' EXISTING:23' rrr� _�_yyyyy{{,yW. \,�1 \ HT OF SUILDING5:2.S STORIES EXISTING.2 STORIES NCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS ON LOT:40' N/A ./ )l V - •�4yiA,O ADDITION O � U _� rte/ uAC ON NEW C PAD NEW STONE WALL (SEATING HEIGHT) �s. / AND HOT TUB �/ �p1/ 14 i PROPERTY 7002 SF 0.16 acres NEW DECK /l � NEWENTRV (![[�� \\1% o �� /� �, \/ 6 RELOCATEDSTAIRS � 2S0 RELOCATED WALKWAY POPPITALBOT / / RESIDENCE 903a.� \ ADDITION 0 / tiP / SaYmxamam N / / Y \ / a g33y EXTENDED DRIVEWAY ? / SITE 2AF,/ PROPOSEDPIAN i PROPOSED SITE PLAN // C A4.1 A3 2 B 1 LIA A4.0 1 A66 O'AIHa vv4n iieoiam A4.1 2' 9" 4-21. 14' 8 �, — �:�L�I X111\I•,II LII r 'II' T 10 12" l STORAGE MOTORCYCLE - -- ,.� _� T �- LXAap — 12 �• -NEW UTILITY SINK . 05 STEEL GAOGE rvlc 1WORKSHOP 1GARAGE 2NBATH04211O6 1 A84 Q " RKSHOP2 a 28 5 P OSS O W 230 S:A6.4 FURNACE I HW z 4 tr-0. NIC HALL 14 r t 03 i c 01 z A6.6 N 02 26 - 30 " UP e 7 — — — — — , BEDROOM 3 ry 1 Aa.3 A3.1 102 - i A4.2 B 141 bF EO EO EO EO 1 -- 5 POPPfTALBOT RESIDENCE OM 1r-105R'. OH T-0.. 7.1 tz-6" NEW MOTORIZED GARAGE DOORS wnaro R 12'-0" 42-9 LE" iT-0" PROPOSED A3.0 LOWER LEVEL n 01 LOWER LEVEL PROPOSED v4"=1._0" c A1.1 C B 1 A4.1 A4.0 A32 ABfi an�o 1 aawv.n LkA �.emaiiim OO D A41 NEW DECK BELOW 1 I -----EWDECK EXISTING DECK A O A8.0 A4 D NEWDECK CONNECTION A6.1 I / II 3IL III BATH` OI O III M.BATH 26 OI O DINING O M.BED 6-ssre'• 32 pL–FI _ KITCHEN 23 34 UI 31 WC 22 - 239 SF I.. - II 2 v 4.1.. Y-0. 4.S,. _ -- .—.—.—. .—.—.--__—_ - _ HALL —- HALL c S ® 3 0 323135 2 28" � ', A6.6 N L 29 24 N N 36 32• HOES BB•R DN OFFICE 1 A33 A31 1 3' 0' LI NG ROOM E BEDROOM 2 CL As.z A42 A 29 28 28 1 1 ' 11.1 4., POPPRALBOT -- RESIDENCE NTRY – A ED ED 6 AVCENTER (GABLE BOX I DVD PLAYER/ �mrs�ne� SLI NG BOX/MODEM/ sbnwmsro A ROUTER ETC.) ® g ENTRY x 12'-0' 42'-97M' 12'-0' 1 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 02 UPPER LEVEL PROPOSED A3.0 FLOOR PLAN_ 1/4"=1'D" J A1.2 u4 tFio .n am amn�i D A A4.1 Ad 0 12'-a D B 1 iz-0- PROPOSED DITION AQ.I A40 Afi6 PRO SEOADDITION O O _ROOF _ _�,_z1 � IJI!II!1111I il!IIIIII�I J I VIII I !I Illlllul I�I�II, L JIJIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIIII 611IIV IIII11�11 � _ _ 22'-8 -� - I I ' �� � II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2 ' I '' ' �I I I ' I '� I� ' ' ' � I ' ' " ' I� I' ' IIIIIIIII u►III Ilil !Iilllilllll �� _ , 1 � r I IIIIIIIII IIIIIII!II iIJ',II�IIII JJI II�III IIIIIIIJII IIIIIIIIIII (III IJIIII 1111'111 IL I�IIIIII I. I IVIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII �IIIJIIIII illlll�lllll JIIJIIII, _ �T .- 99 .-J =- 03 ATTIC. /l / o � ° 02 I SECOND FLOOR _ _ V t -HIE jltR i 8' Y` _01A LANDING n a W-0 V m 01 FIRST FLOOR /1 I- III71 =1I -1I -1I -1I I-1I - - - -1I -1I h-III-1I -1 I- I-1 -1 III III-1I III III-17- 0'-0" NEW GARAGE DOORS NEW LEDGESTONE MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER NEW ENTRY ADDITION IN PLACE OF BRICK VENEER(TYP) n FRONT(SOUTHEAST)ELEVATION POPMALBOT RESIDENCE emxwmsm 5p S "a EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.0 4.eb M41EEO p.;9R�Lo�i�W 2 E ABB Aa2 LU o to ROOF 4�% t — — 22'-8 1/8" 8 I 0 p gop e pQ `es � m 03 ATTIC.n � O lilt I o as �oe� m m �p� 'm mS p�o � oogo° om �' ro� r ° p 8 voo _ _ _ __ _ —_ ___ __ ___ ___ y�:a 'ia �` �.. so�0p� 02 SECOND FLOOR /1 trl�: r� a1t 8' 0' � is is i a I Up 01A LAN DINGn V 01 FIRST FLOOR I I FI 11-111=I I _� �_� I I 1 I EI 11 I I I=I I I I I=I 11 -� _� _� -� -� �_� - - - -� - -Is I 1-I I =III _ �_� �_� �_� �_� �_� �_� �_ -� _� -� _11 111= -I I I=1 I 1-III=III 11 EI I I-- -� -III �_� _ -III= POPPITALBOT 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION RESIDENCE a�wse.n emwaem ¢A i E TERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 �m JA A B C ML AB.6 A4.0 A4.1 D A4.1 m ROOF , PEA 19 KEE o a 0 ° � I 02 SECOND FLOOR n \v\1- 71 8'_0 Eli I 1 131 \V\ 01A LANDING x — 4' I F -.._.... .. :. - - _ 01 FIRST FLOOR 0 n III H-111=111=111=111 I I II III I III II jml III I II II I II II I I 1-01, 1 17-0. 2-0' r1 REAR(NORTHWEST)ELEVATION '�/ 1/4"=1'0" POPP/TALBOT RESIDENCE memsm '0 "a mra.�on EXTERIOR. ELEVATIONS A3.2 Nq 1F£O BMW ns �n Bm.9o11�® E 2 A0.2 AB.6 O L ROO 22'-81/6" 0o ee,oma p e'o 0 0 _ _ 03 ATTIC � e o 44pe�o _ pcb ' pvo U _ 02 SECOND FLOOR gv_0" 1311 e B _ 01A LANDING - 4'-00 vx 4 01 FIRST FLOOR - 0'-0" 1 NORTHEAST ELEVATION POPP/TALBOT 1'-0" RESIDENCE sJnn msnm F' 3R S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.3 Professional Land Surveyors fr Gvil En711 gineers:ESS EX,SURNEI .SERVICE: 1958 - 1986- , 4 • OSBORWPALMER - - 1911 - 1970 BRADFORD &-WEED'- 1885 - 1972 PLOT PLAN OF LAND LOCATED IN 5M S.vz- Z,7T5 f"? l�T x 7000 1� 1) 9a.r < qr •P�iDtL� �X�SiiflG ®SELL/kG &OIT/Gf� P(Ir,miV 90�!%/GlL 12' Z IZ' l r . .ri Za P/1cP1�7� � 'G2Gr7' L l'�Cl�Gje`7l hereby c r i fy ✓� U/LO/�G /� aothat the buildingsare located on the ground as shown. / h SCALE: z 3 C J f` DATE16/ Zl/1 �6, Ea .n , F `;:� R9ELL0 REFERENCE: BK PG Chri6fopher R. ;;. l�G UI `GIIG` c crrsTF< 104 LOWELLSTREES PEABODY, MASS: 01960 (978)531-8.121 FAX:(978) 531-5920 rk EE `J ;Iini 23 215 DEPT. Or. COIJuo1UNlTy DEvcwr „t,1T