Loading...
81 LINDEN STREET - ZBA _ \Y 81 Linden St. R-2 M Philip J. O'Keefe M _ All� T I I i PE - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . it IIf2IiEIli. C'7[I2I55c'it`mtsEfi TO THE 'BOARD OF APPEALS: -'.e Jnaersign r re ent hat he s are `tie owners of a certain parcel of land lac ted, , t 'IO. . . . . . • �< �s .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ctreet: Zonina District. Z._. v . . . . . ana said carte ! is affect=_a by Sectiontsl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -ne :;assacnusetts State Building Code. glans —scribing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in ccoroance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoninq Ordinance. s m . ru _ r Y �A 4 L. The application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons : The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief gay be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following Qreasons: Ell Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . .p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . .-! f.,i�-..�.a`.Z�r. .�. . . ., . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address . . . . . . . . . . . . i. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -ate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - eleonone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . hree copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeais ,with a check, for advertisina in the amount or. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'our .peeks prior to the meetinq of the Board of Appeals . Check payable to The venino News. O I- -T - �o-r Nj � .v N � 1 e .z'J 46•� LO'( rz 3 3 LGL2'+ z 2Y2 STpR� r L-voo FRAME ^ N �4+EAs 1Mb eo - LL4YA-10—*ZLtNY M TI SQp L I N DAN ST2��� THIS PLOT PLAN WAS NOT MADE FROM AN INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND IS FOR THE USE OF THE BANK ONLY. HEFERENCE - UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE OFF DEED: REC. BK. 1833PG. i09 SETS TO BE USED FOR ESTABLISH- PLAN. 1i5n ,oy MENTOFFENCES.WALLS.HEDGES,etr- TO EA%-TV2nj BANK AREERTIFY THAT LOCATED ON THE GROUND ASSSHOWNNWAND THAT MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN THEY CONFORM TO THE ZONING BYLAWS OF THFC,-,� OF 5ALfr+ AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATED IN OR ARE PROTECTED UNDER GENERAL LAMS CH. 40A SAL SFCTION 7. I ALSO CERTIFY THAT THE PREMISES SHOWN AHF NOT LOCATED WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD ZONE ASPREPARED FOR DELINEATED ON THE MAP OF COMMUNITY 1250102. PHIL,P S. ' LINDA O'LfEFE SA(-Tm . MA- EFFECTIVE 8-5-6:5 THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGE HOF4%A?4' SCALE: 1 '= Zo SfW. Z 1991 GAIL s L NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP. " VVITH ATF 46.q� A A Na .a3o WASHINGTON ST. - SALEM ' MA. civ./STEP / FSS-.-- LLANG SUN !'�" X050 & �'s�•ofe `, Ho v S� �, . : �*� f f _ ! P�0(po3FD D�cK _ _ ��• C/9PP/�ay d8a Sq fT' A _. . moo' QiPo�J�/lj� ,Lin/ s_f 120 " . 80 p R •", 117813216 s ti< 220 m 19 49g4 j 182 8 i g 5 6900 52 n 50 365 IT m rS' 'l,IvJI g 198 9000 125 ❑ 012600m 221 j ;0 5Y50 5250 ° 201 6p00 N °�1 180 0 m U5000 52 p I 8 ur u & 55 4000 �� 216 S 1 18 0 Z 8 °"' Ie.000 1 525 p 525 0 196 an 223 1 ^ V �p 4480 p5 50 178 ° "2 ' 0 410040 50 S 52 17 20 400o H 8 224 215 60 188 5932 ' 00 400 N 8170 I ; 4A 6615 194 214 1 " u s • 2 6840 176 W 3113 ro m-$ 2i3 81 ' 5463 ✓ "u+ 10002 1 .• D m � V 400 81139 5 50 1750 3683 ' 5,250 10 191 � 212 to ' ba ST. 5500 9p b ro ® 7200 f 12 �{ ATLpNTIC °e 6550 s/ ^ 1208 o a 'jpp 12465 0 h s e(01 1z* 4(l N 6 -,:,:,,SALEM h0 b -STATE \\\op e b�� �A ;:COLLEGE ofttiem, Httssttcljusetts 3 4 Paara of A"eal MAY 18, 1994 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF MAY 10, 1994 THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF PHILIP O'KEEFE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO EXTEND SIDE & REAR SETBACKS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK AT 81 LINDEN STREET. BOARD OF APPEAL BRENDA M. SUMRALL CLERK OF THE BOARD A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. ` Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title. Board of Appeal ` -r Cts of _,'Sttlem, �Tttssadjusetts 'Nourd of �kupenl :;s DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner,owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming side & rear setbacks to allow construction of a deck. The property is located in the R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the most feasible location for the deck to be placed. I� DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE Ci - , FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET, SALEM page two ` S On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting construction. Special Permit Granted April 27, 1994 Stephen O'Grady, Board of appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal TiN of inlem, Aussadlusetts 3 9 3RvttrD of Appeal j'4,4y id a, DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner,owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming side & rear setbacks to allow construction of a deck. The property is located in the R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the most feasible location for the deck to be placed. afar IG 3 �1 ri; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. 0 KEEFE r,. S4 FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET, SALEM page two S3 On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting construction. Special Permit Granted April 27, 1994 Stephen O'Grady, ember Board of appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal ofttlem, � Httssttcl�usetts 3 s �uttrd of peal jNgy id � a. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner,owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming side & rear setbacks to allow construction of a deck. The property is located in the R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the' rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the most feasible location for the deck to be placed. 3 _ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE C+ �1 Cii ,Sq FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET, SALEM page two `S; On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting construction. Special Permit Granted April 27, 1994 9 % Stephen O'Grady, ember Board of appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal ofttlem, � ttssttdlusetts ;,4 s $3narD of Aupeal id 1 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held April 27, 1994 with the following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Acting Chairman; Gary Barrett, Stephen O'Grady, Associate Members Nina Cohen and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner,owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming side & rear setbacks to allow construction of a deck. The property is located in the R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of the special permit would allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the most feasible location for the deck to be placed. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP J. O'KEEFE - FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 81 LINDEN STREET, SALEM page two S On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting construction. Special Permit Granted April 27, 1994 `1 % Stephen O'Grady, ember Board of appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal DATE OF HEARING a7 p PETITIONER LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND WITHDRAW SECOND CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT G NT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE GARY M. BARRETT ALBERT C. HILL STEPHEN O'GRADY STEPHEN TOUCHETTE ASSOCIATE MEMBERS NINA V. COHEN ARTHUR LEBRECQUE CONDITIONS: 3 L CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by PHILIP J. ,O'KEEFE for a Special Permit to extend noncon- forming side and rear setbacks to allow construc- tion of a deck at 81 LINDEN STREET(R-2).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second Floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman April 13, 20, 1994 SN40172 ( CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by PHILIP J. l)'KEEFE for a Special Permit to extend noncon- - forming side and rear setbacks to allow construc- tion of a deck at 81 LINDEN STREET(R-2).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman April 13, 20, 1994 SN40172 II f CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by PHILIP J. .O.KEEFE for a Special Permit to extend noncon- forming side and rear setbacks to allow construc- tion of a deck at 81 LINDEN STREET(R-2).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman April 13, 20, 1994 SN40172 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by PHILIP J. O'KEEFE for a Special Permit to extend noncon- forming side and rear setbacks to allow construc- tion of a deck at 81 LINDEN STREET(R-2).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,APRIL 27,1994 AT 6:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second floor. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Vice Chairman April 13, 20, 1994 SN40172 "PEA_ '-.SSE 'i0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9itu of ;airm, ` C usstzchu aPtts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: -he Undersigned rnt t t he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land lo c ed G/ t '!0. . . . .r� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and said carcei is arfected by Sectionisj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )r the i•lassacnusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. T } cm T'S l 4 The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons : /� 4rd The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Owner. . . �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . .S. 9.. M. x.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ate. . . . . . . . . -eleonone. . . . . . . . . .`f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertisina in the amount or. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals . Check payable to The venina News. 2,2 6 �� .� ! �_ J � z z � � z z r > j A R1 � X _ Z J �J 0 1 O < Z ^i � G � Z G ❑ a �. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,cam. �tfU of airm, c 2TSgtIt!{Il28Ptt5 TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: -he Unaersign r re ent at he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loe� c '10. . . . . . . s?c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning Districtc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ana said oarcei is affeczea by Sectiontsj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )f zne •?assachusetts State Building Code. Plans cescribing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. r� O rn Y 3 D- The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: L� Owner. . .:1A"e�_ . . .�1. . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Telephone.. . . . :.�. 4 .� . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . .alder. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ elephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertisin❑ in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *our weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. O � Z G D ❑ . _z,Cf y,l 2'Sf N N e Ig o� Iz:3 L4S i Lo,T 3 9 Z02'8 34 ty • .1 4.1; m �g nJIF M re ACME/ z ZYt'srortl T wva 4r^ mew 4' LLeS' T13NL__ : SQp L IND�I.1 ST2C�'� THIS PLOT PIAN WAS NOF MADE FROM AN INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND IS WR THE USE OF THE BANK ONLY. HEFERENCE - UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE OFF DEED: REC. BK. 1833 P6. i0Q SETS TO BE USED FOR ESTABLISH- PLAN: 193 I,oy MENTO:FENCES.WALLS.HEDGES,etc. TO EAS- VLN BANK CERTIFY LBUILDING (S) UNNSWNW LOCATED ON THE GROUND HEREON ARETHAT MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN THFY CONFORM TO THE ZONING BYLAWS OF THFC,'T � OF 5Atfr+ AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION LOCA TF_U IN OR ARE PROTECTED UNDER GENERAL LAWS CH. 40A S/9 C SFCTION 7. NOTLLOCATEDIWITHINTATHE FLLOOD HAZARD ZONE ASE PREPARED FOR DELINEATED ON THE MAP OF COMMUNITY Izsolo2 pHlup S f LW�A O'Kfff£ SAL£r+ MA.. EFFECTIVES-SBS THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGE g Mtq�S9cyG SCALE 1 v= 20 SAN. Z9 199! GAIL ITM NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP_ 29 y/ No. A A o WASHINGTON ST. - SALE M /Ma. G G•S[.�fiQ Ho U S� P _ f P Pee�asFD fl�cK Y _ _ ��• C/9PP/�ay d8a Sq fT' Cfx��, Si/I•R3� L , Aj 3 i f�•SL•Og,Q Ho U S� a P�'°(po3FD Dfc�' Y moo' O�Qo���L .Linl6 SL ,OCR _ a P�0(po3FD DEck/ Y A moo' o. peo/��.er,L 11,006 o-T s c o7 y ' � SO.O• Go-r 3 t3 S.-I'+ 4. 7 N c N f1-ti i 46 i s.s 40-T n�IF 25A %A may.r i 3f Ll.s n SQp � L JND�)•l ST2��'( THIS PLAT PIAN WAS NOT MADE FROM AN INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND IS FOR THE USE OF THE BANK ONLY. REFERENCE - UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE OFF DEED: REC. BK. 1833 PG. io9 SETS TO BE USED FOR ESTABLISH- PLAN: o5nJ105 MENT0 FENCES,WALLS,HEDGES,etc. TO EAS'TL2N EIPNt ECTTHE NSSSHOWNANDWET ARELOCATED ON GROUNDA THAT MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN THEY CONFORM TO THE ZONING BYLAWS OF THECzy OF 5AL£P+ AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATED IN OR ARE PROTECTED UNDER GENERAL LAWS CH_ 40A SA` SECTION 7. _ NOWN OTLLOCATEDSO IWITHINTAhFLOOD HAZARDMISESS ASF PREPARED FOR DELINEATED ON THE MAP OF COMMUNITY 1250102. SALtriMA_ EFFECTIVE 8-5-85 PHILIP S f LINDA 0 UEFS THE-FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGE otNO`Et�os9cy SCALE: 1 20 SAN. Z9 .� 1941 GAIL w g sL. y NORTH SHORE SURVEY .CORP. / A F� A A N0'�'` o WASHINGTON ST.' - SALEM Ma. 'rF Lo? S oT y i s0'0' - [o-r 3 IL3 s.11" sl- S S! N ¢ N [.0-T 2 0 o S.b r /Ij IF r zlt" 3TOB0 N fjWTU IAIb O] Y x tE� Ilw1: 4 zas . . . 3t zl.s sad THIS PLOT PIAN WAS NOT FADE FROM AN INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND IS FOR THE USE OF THE BANK ONLY. REFERENCE — UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE OFF DEED: REC. BK. 1833 PG. i0y SETS TO BE USED FOR ESTABLISH- PLAN: ons)io5 MENTOFFENCES.WALLS.HEDGES,etc. TO EA5TC2Ai BA,vk AREERTIFY THAT LOCATED ON THEE GROUND ASSHOWNTHAT MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN THEY CONFORM TO THE ZONING BYLAWS OF THFCiiy OF 5ALCmAT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATED IN OR ARE PROTECTED UNDER GENERAL LAWS CH. 40A 4FCTION 7. I ALSO CERTIFY THAT THE PREMISES SHOWN ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS PREPARED FOR DELINEATED ON THE MAP OF COMMUNITY I250102 pg1L1P S ' LINDA O'KfEfE SALTM MA.. EFFECTIVE 8-5-65 THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGEoLjNO`��°s9�y SCALE 1 2p 7AAN. ZI 1991 GAIL N L NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP_ / L9 9" No.=43 A �%H_4FASSIgUNk A F ,moo WASHINGTON ST. - SALEM , MA. ��so A/1�N SJ�� BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL. PAGI-'-*. ......... . DA' L 2 3 ' "T .............. Y1 4 • 3 A 4 5 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY4 MAP: 32 LOr: 0204 SUFE: 7 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0081 L.114(-YEN STREET 8 .....I...I�', IN ............. ...... 2 .............. ............................ I ... .... 10 ;!Aftf a Aomn� 13 :4 • lz 3 : 0204 006.1 LINDEN STREET OKEEFE PHILIP J 81 LINDEN STREET I SA6 I ............................1' ,N........ 3s L K - 14 1% E r N, ST )OUCET-TE,',jAjt4ET,S,." "I%........ ......... ........ REE7 - .......... . ................... SA �MA` I ........... ............ .I......... 94 `6 1 .I...I.... ........20 15 ....... 4PIC31 ; l 32 0193 0026 WISTERIA KANTOROSINSKI HENRY DANDERS MA 01923 22 • e 21 STREET L.HEUREUX RAOUL. 1 26 WISTERIA ST 23 :8 -1 24 W 18 47F al W�,,WR A �STREETe '-,"%".%,�.]��., -',RIA:,ST .E NDHAM-REAL'T'Y-, TRUST 26 • 27 l 20 ............... r�i °I• TRSEM 21 ......%............... ............ —, 1.11,1.,,1 Il , .." . — I �I"I................ AT... ........ 22 12T-R.E- TY14W MICHAUD D/MICHAUD M/MICHAUD D TRS SALEM MA 0-.1970 32 0196 0020 WISTERIA 91 REET HAYES ROBERT F 2 E 0 WIST' RIA ST 24 3] 2a --SAI EN WA 0 15!71 331 SAT ............. 25 ....... ........ 8 1 S 7t.,R% 2, ........ 32L3121 1 3 ........... .............. RE h4 SA Y ..........e�, 3 .................... 11 1 5 27 ..... .............. -6 1 2G2 ll, 26 P1 4AA,l lrj%',ARxwwR 37 6 LORRAINE T SALEM MA 0-1970 3 30 32 0203 0077 L.I N DEN STREET FUREY MICHAEL. J 77 LINDEN ST ✓ 3 U.pi NA Q-1 971") 40 31 ............ ......... .......... .............. 41 .......... ... -T- 0205 .. 00831'LINDEN 83", T." --E. ...... ..... 42 .................. -fi 01 43 ........................... I. WARREM-MA P A • .................... I I %,,,"I:%, I ."'I...... 33 ........ `R-IR 4 ......... - ag 44 4� 45 35 CANDCLARIA JOSEPH SALEM MA 01971 460 47 36 48 ............77 .......... ..I. ...I..I.I. . ........... .......... .............. 49 37 .I I . ................................... ...... ..........e 0 3 39 ...... ...... ............ ....... 52 ........... .... 40 53 41 :4 0 5 42 56 431.......e ......I ........ ...... I .... 57 Z l •44 .......... I..I59 60 ................I • 45 55 46 •47 63 48 64 41 i5 % 50 67 68 52 69 053 7170 0 54 paf 7 2 55 ....... 77777777777 T3 • PETER ^M.% CAC 74 56 R 71 �71 •{ 4/y 9".4pM1". Sp . 20 le 7b a It's 216 to , p P 99 9 $ 220 IT 1� 9800 4984 5250 $ g 3655 17 %K 181 ❑$ 198 9000 , 80 5Y50 12600 " 221 5250 0 t " ? $0000 20160018� S n7 £ m 22_ a182 O 5250 y r�i�l N376020 11 216 5250 5250 0 18000 10, , rl 187 178 042000 4000 'v 4480 5250 5250 177 `� 20 4000 224 215 60 a 1 $ 188 8932 n 00 00 g 8170 M n 4 b 1761 1 66 ,L 194 eA40 13 5463 o 3713 $ aN 3"� 400 $ 11:: : � roi 1'5 50 1750 , 369 14 L 51250 51 lob 191 ® 212 m . 7200 T• 5500 9 y S 12061 pTLpNTIC o? 6550 k.;xt `rn 7200 .-.,)" 105-9 00 17465 //Pi qos kN y as 0 IV ? ao a RFF ��1 O h10 p%\O 0 llj h0 0 SALEM �p 10 h0 h6 ;STATE \�N�o . ,y 44J 0Lj�,E6E Y I `•MS 4 0.0 Oj �, �r J• '