14 LEMON STREET - ZBA 1 L s�
LVIA-M
4
Al
0
OOND17 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS O 1970
TELEPHONE 978-745-9595
FAX. 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL 2009 JUN 30 A H: 51-1
MAYOR
FILE 0
CITY CLEM, SALEM, M A SS,
June 29, 2009
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of DEBRA KIRCHHEIMER seeking a Variance from Accessory Structure
regulations (side and rear yard setbacks) to replace an existing 10'x16' shed with a
new 8'x12' shed on the property at 14 LEMON STREET, Salem,MA(R2 zoning
district).
Petitioner seeks a variance pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, §7-8: Accessory
buildings and structures.
Statements of fact:
1. Mary DeLai,who co-owns the property with petitioner Debra Kirschheimer,
presented the petition.
2. In a petition dated May 28,2009,the applicant requested a dimensional variance to
accommodate the replacement of an existing 10'x16'shed with a new 8'x12'shed on
her property at 14 Lemon St.
3. Plans submitted with the application show the existing shed does not conform with
the required five-foot rear or side line setbacks for accessory structures. The
proposed shed would be smaller than the existing one and would be set back one
foot from the rear and side property lines.
4. A public hearing on the above mentioned Petition was opened on June 17,2009,
pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §$ 11. The pubic hearing was closed on
June 17,2009,with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present:
Robin Stein (Chair),Rebecca Curran, Richard Dionne,Beth Debski,Bonnie Belair
(alternate), and Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate).
5. No one spoke in opposition to the project. A direct abutter to the property stated
that she would like to see the shed fixed, and that the existing shed's deteriorating
condition had led to sinkholes on her property. The applicant concurred that there
were sinkholes at both the abutter's properly and her own, and that this was due to a
leaking underground pipe that had disintegrated.
2
6. At its meeting on June 17,2009,the Board of Appeal voted five (5) in favor and
none (0) opposed to grant a variance from the dimensional requirements of 57-8,
Accessory buildings and structures,to allow for the replacement of an existing
10'x16'shed with a new 8'x12'shed on the property located at 14 Lemon St.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following
findings:
1. Desirable relief maybe granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the
zoning ordinance.
2. The applicant mayvary the terms of the Residential Two-Family District to
construct the proposed development,which is consistent with the intent and
purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance.
3. In permitting such change,the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to,the Plans,Documents and testimony,the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
1. To allow for the reconstruction of the shed as proposed,the requested variance from
dimensional requirements for accessory buildings and structures is granted.
In consideration of the above,the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor (Stein,
Curran,Belair,Debski and Dionne) and none (0) opposed,to grant petitioner's requests for
a variance and special permit subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall
be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained.
6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board.
7. Petitioner is to contact the Salem Water Department to ensure that no pipes on the
property are leaking.
3
Robin Stein, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD
AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be trade pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the
office of the City Clerk Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section
11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry
of Deeds.