4 LANGDON STREET - ZBA MOM
4 Langdon St. R-2
_ William Melanson
� l
v`
1�
y�
-'ATE GF "r.5ARIt]G lP���
PETITIC2IER
L0CAT IO I
;LOTION: -C GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND 4
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
: SAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD EENCAL
RICHARD FEBONIO /
FRANCS GREALISH
EDAAAD LUZINSKI
STEPHEN TOUCI3ETTE
ASSOCIATE :1EMBERS
BONALI
PLAN
45
LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS:
Z
- Cj�
�I
b T Tity of ttlem, 'fflttssadjusetts
=4
= F Paurb of 'ppeal
July 8, 1992
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIET TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION AT 4 LANGDON ST.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section y of
Chapter SOB, and shall be filed within Cl days
the Mass.General Laws, lection 11,the Variance
after the date of filing of this decision in the office ti the City til a COPY of the
pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Ch`:,�''r G0II'
or gpecial Permit granted herein sohalt he cityKclerk that 20 days have
rertification of or that,if such appeal has been
decision, bearing the been tiled,
elapses snd no QX
apPesl hzs
tiled, that it tra seen dismissed or denied is recorded in the South ss
Registry of Ceeds and in d the owner's certificate the name rofhTitl,n of record oL
,is recorded and noted �n goARE)OF 090111
f
(1llity of �ulem, ��ttssttcljusett�uc g 1
ciry 32 411 91
F bnttrD of �Av}iettl CLR of c„tE
E K,� h'. u�S
C-
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 4
LANGDON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held June 24, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio,
Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to
extend a nonconforming side setback to allow construction of an
addition in this R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare
of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact;
1. There was no opposition to this petition.
2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of
life for the petitioner.
i
PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 4 LANGDON STREET, SALEM
page two JUL
11 32 Vii; 'p,
CITY �; .,
3. The impact of the addition is extremely minimal. CLER,r,-, ',:
lI , _
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: '
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the
public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant
the Special Permit requested, subject to the. following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke
and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the
addition.
5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure
and shall be approved by the Building Department.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
June 24, 1992
Stephen Touchette, Member /
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 4 LANGDON STREET, SALEM
page three jtk 8
CITY OF
CCERg;`��E4
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOkDOMA 7t--
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City .Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted
herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no
appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it
has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry
of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is
recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(fit" of �ttlem, � ttssttcljusett c � f
crr � 32
F -Boura of cAupettl Cy OF cz
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 4
LANGDON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held June 24, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio,
Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to
extend a nonconforming side setback to allow construction of an
addition in this R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare
of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact;
1. There was no opposition to this petition.
2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of
life for the petitioner.
r
PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 4 LANGDON STREET, SALEM
page two JUL
32
CITY ,
3. The impact of the addition is extremely minimal. GIEfl,K
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: '
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the
public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant
the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke
and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the
addition.
5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure
and shall be approved by the Building Department.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
June 24, 1992
Stephen Touchette, Member /
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 4 LANGDON STREET, SALEM
page three
ja
CITY Or 91
CtfRKK..;AI` 4 y
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING AkDOAANP t;ILTLIE
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City .Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted
herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no
appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it
has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry
of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is
recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
r
= ' Cttn of �ziem, � ussttcljusett�ut 8 I
r
-Sonrb of 'AITfTP21l CIC OF c`'LEN 3
2
LERk,;c 1
11^-
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 4
LANGDON STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held June 24, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio,
Edward Luzinski, Francis Grealish Jr. , and Stephen Touchette.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to
extend a nonconforming side setback to allow construction of an
addition in this R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare
of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the
following findings of fact;
1. There was no opposition to this petition.
2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of
life for the petitioner.
PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 4 LANGDON STREET, SALEM
page two JUL
� 32
C/TY
3. The impact of the addition is extremely minimal . CLERK ; `,', 4 '
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: '
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the
public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant
the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes,
ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and by legal building permit.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke
and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the
addition.
5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure
and shall be approved by the Building Department.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
June 24, 1992
"� `✓ GG . ���
Stephen TouchetteB, Member
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM MELANSON FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 4 LANGDON STREET, SALEM
page three Ju 8
CITY or-
CLE
F I l 33 Qy ,91
CLERKK;A1 . y
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING B'NkDOARPft�
CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City .Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted
herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no
appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it
has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry
of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is
recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE,
U,
.DATE Aur 10/9 .... .. ...
•
2
2
FIEDIMTTE-R ..... ... .1 3
4
............
4 5
05 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP., 15 LOT: 0338 SUFE. 6
0
PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0004 LANGDON STREET ]
-ASSE90Fb OWNER
7
SON R.' &AARDA
MELANS 10
12,
0—MAP-L-OT-S F PROPERTI(`ADDRESS ASSESSED-01 INER -MA1tfNG-A 13
0 1 14
2 15 0338 0004 LANGDON STREET MELANSON WILLIAM J 4 LANGDON STREET 150
13
17
14 15 0329 .. 0050 PROCTOR STREET SALEM CITY OF
MANSELL PLAYGROUND 18
19
15
20
76 15 03M.2 0005 1-ANG0011 f,=Fkfr-.T,.T j(jA!4f'fA 21
.1] OQUENDO IRISIOQUENDO EUGENE SALEM MA 01970 22
:8 15 01335 0010 LANGDON STREET SAUNDERS EDWARD F 10 LANGDON STREET 23
-L-117-HA-
19 ......
.......... ....... ........ 9A 0
........ 25
..........bdd626ANW IISf -T�' AR R .........
20 G YI ....... 8�.L�AN(
26
... .. .. .... ...... 270
—v,".,
%— � ,V.N. M . .....
f ......11 1', , % 31 l
�_!e,,%I _%% ��, ,—.�1, 28
R...... .
22 29
.23 -59 SANTOS MURIEL R SALEM MA 0-1970 3010
24 15 03, 0002 LANGDON STREET REAGAN JOSEPH F 2 LANGDON STREET 3;
3
25 ........
............ _9
I... 33
AP ,STRFET"" 'VASS I I Al%- i:t : I I ..... ....... PROCT09 STRET.V-
21
A EA _, 350
M
27 ....... ................. I. ...
T—R 1) 6
'34 f -1-�,HAk� 37
28 tj M Z) 8 7 JN-S.
.29 ANN M SALEM MA 01970 38
30 15 0,342 0030 PROCTOR STREET' JAMONT BENJAMIN 30 PROCTOR ST, ✓ 39 0
41
31 J "NT--MA R-1-0 4 -SAL-EM-MA-0 1 9 70 41
15 0343 0016 PROCT.OR STREET MALIK EMBOSSING CORP: 1
32 22 VARNEY sTRFEET-11 420
-AL.F--.I,l MA 43
•33 G 011770 44
34 15 0344 0 0 12 4 PROCTOR STRE'E'T —M-:F E 45
035 AGATHA C SALEN MA 015170 46
1
36 .115 (3,345 0 0 22 PROCTOR STREET ONEILL 22.JOSEPH M PROCTOR sT ✓ 47 48 0
--- --MA
17 FA I 9ll.
49
5040
38 . ..............
51
12
40 53
.41 540
55 z
42
56
43
17
............
..... ...... 58
44
60
45
..........
46 61
0 47 620
63
48 64
49
65
• 6
so' 6 0
..........
51 67
1.68
52 69
053 700
54 7172
55 .......... 7,
73
•
W4
TE.,R 11%
....... L.PE
5
6 �175
C :APSE ASLS,'-;0 R
�7
a
S3� O "F`,
19P r :•
cr
if
00
a96
Jpo
�p t
//�� 1; 324
15
0 45 Q,
Oip�sg . ¢500 �r 4
's
s
e�$9 — 3 7
' s a t 4 x 1v40$
s 3A2. o GtY l 6F At
S 539
s�E 10618 '4� ' 8200 d
° 5.34
tia
2
0
0
i3
40
41
.�)�.-_
�✓ Mi
jj
•, - tL � _ � � _tea ^_
,
/CITY OF SALEM
.BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by WILLIAM MEL-
ANSON for a Special Permit to extend a
nonconforming side setback to allow construction
clan addition at 4 LANGDON ST.IR-21.Said hear-
ing to be held WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1992 at
7:00 p.m., ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
June 10, 17, 1992
x x x x r x x_a x x x x x x x +
Y Y +{ x x x x x x x M x x x Y x +
m N m b
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by WILLIAM MEL-
ANSON for a Special Permit to extend a
nonconforming side setback to allow construction
of an addition at 4 LANGDON ST.(R-2).Said hear-
ing
7:Otpme, ONE SALEM GREEN, 2ndheld WEIAESDAY, JUNE 2floorr92 at
O
RICHARD A. BENCAL, hairma4
June 10, 17, 1992
Y Y f Y Y Y � Y r Y Y f f Y l
f Y Y Y # Y Y f Y Y Y Y Y f f Y �
i A V m �
yjz;,F
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by WILLIAM MEL-
ANSON for a Special Permit to extend a
nonconforming side setback to allow construction
of an addition at 4 LANGDON ST.(R-2).Said hear-
ing to be held WEDNESDAYSALEM , JUNE 24, 1992 at
7:00 p.m., ON2nd floor
RICHARD A. BENCAL , Chairman
, s
June 10, 17, 1992 SN72314
9
6
2 X 2.0 4.0 JUMP
EAST/WEST MORTGAGE
RATES ARE DOWN? a
50744 6/05/92 E044
DAVID WINDER
6
y
r�
CITY OF SALEM
r; BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 361
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by WILLIAM MEL-
ANSON for a Special Permit to extend a
nonconforming side setback to allow construction
of an addition at 4 LANGDON ST.(11-2).Said hear-
ing to be held WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1992 at
7:00 p.m., ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
June 10, 17, 1992
i i i i Y i i / i i i i i Y i /
� V � b
S= 1,
t^ CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
' 745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by WILLIAM MEL-
. ANSON for a Special Permit to extend a
nonconforming side setback to allow construction
of an addition at 4 LANGDON ST.(R-2).Said hear-
ing to be held WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1992 at
7:00 p.m., ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, hairma4
June 10, 17, 1992
V."
Y Y Y Y i i �� i iii i i i
i i i iii i Y i Y Y Y Y M Y Y
0 r Gl �O
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by WILLIAM MEL-
ANSON for a Special Permit to extend a
nonconforming side setback to allow construction
of an addition at 4 LANGDON ST.(R-2).Said hear-
ing to be held WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1992 at
7:00 p.m., ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
June 10, 17, 1992 SN72314
:!'
.� ��
•
i
nmm��nnn�n�mm�
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A•G
of �211Pttt� ��Y33ttL�1ISP�5
s�
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land toated
at NO. . . . . . . . . /. .�aA J.o.N. . .S �:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District R.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
x
un 00)
o rn m
TX
x Tw
C'> CJ
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following:
o T G .,.
reasons : ;, =
\�'?
Cu
-o
- m
tU
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Sj eC�A �I � erw
T
To Fx�en G� c, ✓Ios�
C d✓l {a/vn S/ S 1 1919'C
Ct or )
Own er!/�/,� (./G. ..�✓. . . . . . . . . . .
/ J 7 -
Telephone. . . . . .„.... . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. c _
Address. . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . r l7. 7�a. . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
❑ El
PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. ,
DATE: MAY 6, 1992
SCALE: 1"=20 '
NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey and not
an instrument survey, therefore all offsetts shown_
are approximate
BAYSTATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, . MASS. ,
J
�By T Sy.
0. 26094
0
. 'mss 9fCiSTEkcO ,``a
R
l J.0
\ � !1•b
T�' p
Iq
Loi
iN
S
LA NGDON ST
�1=1 I—Lu
41
NY � ;j 11
C)LW
ol
Ul
p cam `
Aj \A
Cy
>
1p
l
11
5
h S
4
r,
w
00
GJ
lit
ip
o Z)o
i
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.C�
C#u 1fttlEm, ca55aLIT1ISE#f5
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
h r1U Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
The Lng
9. 4 C,A \A.Y\ . .Q-. . r.w>:. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Street; Zoning District.& R .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Sectionls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Lode.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. l of the Zoning Ordinance.
n a
r
< N
m o —
x
Na CO
r
o rn �
T �
mD
� N
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the folTowirfg_; s7
reasons :
�rec. 1 r-n; CK)
� .
CA
tV
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
�Frw,1 To O nor, Coni Si � �
� f� A Tc, ad cn
Address. . .1111ei �a.v. . : .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . .?.yS-. .,!, 17/.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peti ti oner.`./Ve���G��. �/. �17s0f1
Address. . . . . . . . . . ft! L. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. S°?� - a
. . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . :.. -_< . . . . . . . . .
By. . ✓4. i4`y
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO............ ... ..................
PFTIl ION 10 BOARD 01: APPEALS
LOCA I ION
.......... .......
['17111 U)NER............
ADDRESS................. ..... . ....... ...........
.......................
CONDITIONS
.......................... .............
........... ..........
........................- ......
............. ........
........ ......................................................
......... ......... ........... ...........................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
........... ........... 19.........
............................ C114 C
PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. ,
DATE: MAY 6, 1992
SCALE: 1"=20 '
NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey and not
an instrument survey, therefore all offsetts shown
are approximate
BAYSTATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. ,
B T
JA
j ;
o. 26094
a
i3
A a1 peov�
L w w �co�tioN <_ses�arLs
LG
9
14 'L
i
I
y
5 I
- - w1.s ;
� �, NGDON sT
t'.
� l
J -
fl'.?
Q J
J I '
J �\
S s ,
J
lY
v
i
y
i
i
v;
Y
i
i
l I r1 1
/ i +
i .
r
I i
i , t
i
� i
swa ,,� s X S
l
-
,y 5
i
J
0 �
'7
' i U
_ y
J
t
IN
� o • • U f
J �
;J
G
r -
r Ii
I
r� lii jl
C c
X
� 02
ci
11
1�
0
� s
y
`ro -
00 3
`324
3400 4 70C
v9 \,2T,q `a j 44 32r,
O F ° • 30 � Q - FZ
•� FT o. � 5p 0 a � �' e
• t �
358= {
1.60AC 317
aJ / 1.7405
°a 342 o w CITY F
° 44 a T950 �. , a SA"EY
!p !sem 8�1 0
od!%
c6 Ire, w \
•
416 1-n
V
4. a . in P\
•P I 5 3z N,
S 1
14GDO co
�� •-1= � `J 0r, 424 0
329 \
LJ AC `` S
't
V
s , T
- foi-
i
u
Q •s s
s s
u
d
7 6
X � f
i
7
` o
J s
�X v • r �
J
i r
*
ll..
Ei
�. .�.Fi//+ •-.Fw �#Ki ,,�F�� £ '�;�, a i f, ^I�R� o: *i S. +.as „�as,Y,. ; .,� # ��-.r.�
x ° m. %.vk JC�„ ' ,Aisrt� L'-` � +-szxy�s�S Vr '.fit• `a' '�y� "°b zts?o'*Y.," ✓ .,4 .eix�4 .Is
i_ 'w �a
- ..
z.
wa
t ..`1 r '' 'ear 9m``. s,. 6 ✓-" rtA x v r'� f. .r-;,. .tea s..Z�Y`L�'S��F
K
••.3uYi::
n
� •.. c�fM
3L �S fM1•�' }.
` 4Q
� k
IV
/ L yy y�' Y.F` ih
i Ct1 IM,
lw
[ yY
rx
h � r
- �. �q x' 111111 ` ,� a„ � ;�k � „,X•
:r
3��.> �Y +a s��"� S� rya"4 5}9a'C��v.+. S•t �. `Y bti �rK,�. �t+1W4. �Y �4� V g '.. F
P' �i
kFp�'
�:,��S� Rs
v 6 FSvd Jp �` sr ": —fes 4g , ^ rd �•` 's{ +-.�-} a
w'*Y:eaiexcs. &�xiTN,� 3oSs:.m "�li�
'�s 3 Oo
i
S
' [ m a « _g
9 T. 3 €
h Lam+ �yJ.�r y� s ;.;':i ���.0 H q���•bL '- Y�
/Y
"Q9 z
e V gig—
"Avow 4 9. $ f �.
,� °J K +
.' ' ' ' a', '. ,n° +rr W' v "A : ' �i'•..: ry gip'
�.• S t�� '�%"t��l.�`�:4•'3�vR'iw°i L $„. F t. is � eYgi ,
"+.•t O a �, � ,�tR'�vv.°p* z^ -x' rT�t �•Y F !�'t,sLJ/ �a 4t �.r *�'� ,&r
NAP"
i1 -
Eli
. � r�i nth -s �#
M A 4� ya�. r.�ss44w.�.t't Y•'�^ d r S r\ i �,�+4�.P[� � kA 9.+ �$kvg,'�:' sA tet''
4 �a t V „ x, d,¢T;,�3,u.3, *tea •i
t
4 s \• x vy'Ir S'�4 ,Ay rt i *n>:yw�a+ 4 x` f '' .a. +€*
2
tY
.rytisr`..e�c'.YLlsv...:L-mt�Ya:� —r..s�tL '-.d� r.t rrLLY '``4etviace.avx.t�..<.�u:.:.�.�..........u_.�..>viiuli.Yet�u�nn_:ee..L '.v... .:.. . ......: ...�..r •. •
� u
S
�r ,
o
APT
win a
1,114. 4j
WAS
, k
. a :,..
a
Y �~m
J �
N' Y°Y ytTq
?/ � .4�iC• x4`wr%� ```n' z <�" `\ +'i��b/ Y V:s W 1 t - sir: x� '� + t
� Er. 4 x ?t�TMy��'+'*• Y^ rr a as 'b�iG�'.V''��`� t,... .�,".At�fig. ; ib'. f �. &t 1, �s
+ c'?,;:r: - J:�y, 3�fg:.n«a-..,v.-a•.,. M�y�£�*ygi3 yr'?*� '{p.!.ek ». �s,.� S' f_. F
L z p q
• A -y♦#r,'S`��YA�w �'' o�'N �qr s ,rxt �"n. e �F r}'y�;,f.€4, `��h a � �Ar
v � ' '. b �y ��+ �i �ia �a*° } '"+ l�"sx`��,���' t�4�,t��'Na I,• 0.Ts F'" Y� e
5' , re
arriW�ar.»� �r,, sv {m
3�$
x
hp 4
unmu
�lzR t ✓ Ri`> -'.btii5 ar. y Y v`.7�►
'ttttt
ACtgv�i*uz..+x�3� TII:�c�d\
ONE
.A
w
Lsµr '
Nil AllAN
S � " t 9 � t�11. 2•A�t{r�� I
5 i n
SOON
4 Y
WX 11
74
co <
is
$� h ti t o 4( i C k t• @7 xa
th�e 5 u e�j l mn �, g: y sE s xs' £YE .k v •.� dq
CIA
.SI''1,y 'aNv4 , <' •.9p �',y,` ' s /1�`, `L� Y(
" 1,
Ell -m
a Jll
'R iH t t
x 5 a.ggk
``�y�`0.4°s.T ^ "?3#� �w .5��} P`. t' ... „..eA rr-.� �.- t:� '�k6��r�+ aiti�e�✓r�^,"4�. :��1.�., rt�,�M: �:-�
y
,t �' 4 � tiµ .�• + r� ���i M y�:.
r } �ale F�4 :^K.' s .s T' T4 t�} •S, t ^M�-
hA lw
}_`::Y'""'zza+'S°+7- a -
� :.x exp ;.- } +`.� �� � � _ ,x. ,•
AQ
11
. ( r.y q„+ "♦ y +.s�.,�rF,"'�'P F„st k � F Y'�i�� x4^4 ..
/ fir, " � s.. eL �•k'% d�`k.8t���a�� �X s..r:s +e.=cvr,i: � d �� �s`4d aF'.:
s .." ~ �. �- ��� y� � fi •�.> Viz.. � �� .�
1 ?
=..3 `v R,� �g+x�•f * ,,,} � Y` s "f'r ��¢y� � „r«y{„'yC�y a^.
R4� K
i{ h41, q fW
nsy� Dk �*�P��'�• a �' � I'�' •F s � � j'.S} � P 7 M� Y /�f� g: 4 J .� ��,y,�"f zJi+�'Y''•F
W "y"w�T ��
a� .s
y��WW 3
r'
e.
i' *
d * sy$rS' 'g'.yt� � , �, � '.�.`� gt'3�"i»f ,�'.ny �' i z,'r,{ ��: �" � '3e +� •C c. < ,
3 '4L141`
O r
i
„q
J �;• - "i� as"y.
S s R
9 O 0�.�+Zip
`
S 8 •p 961 Is.
ti
a •
�. }c 4
10
o
�
y �Y i #tk 'NMI-
MI- V' � rFF
C R
'S l JTZ % $sy„a di A4 1 .`!I 4 ypRyk 4'. Y y W '
�D4'r+6�'
Y` a e;. �'1( a +,� -ksfi F+w'x,. viz `�• x�`rs "� ':.��*+y` '`3 r-""�t6�� t �'$'• y �., �.
z+'YS'g'i
_ y'��yrs � mph in
qyf, VF'v- 3}^ �A/.a i; r i'�' �di r '"'i tet {$"°2 t r• i4 . tl '
e xiYs •`vq{<{fr, r u[� :F• 6+ " #F t y Y
• / Y � Y � Y vtiF� M�Y• �':�F �� t,t `Y � �'TJ[ �!' �Y �'F �j � � . �`i'�`4 •
W ye f S p 91• ^ 4 �'y
Y •'�iK.Y c
_
t
t f �� t '� 0^ s "�„+v�,tr.�`w`� 'T=�-� � � �+�` '{-e�� tom•} "z��s., {a e'S q� �
ay �t �F•� SR �" � F. �""�' },�����io ate• '� s�°�'s7k�'"��i � x'S'� t +�}^- Jl. { 'Lr,"s�t 3�tx 'F' n "5
��"' �` ,�"� 73 �i�y d '� sib Jc'h✓ d a� c -» ,� ,x+d+- !}d*M �(;a� z k y �7 �qa e.�• x�e i �a
ki"
q p gym. �.+�;���p• R ` /t'�n 4� [Yp�
4 s: SYS '>�t � r ry- .:�'�S'a •' i•�' �3aK.�^.vt �}� e9jp t£ "`' 'dV� � i t 'S n.
1
" c
� s ,k Y M .. 4a. • , r
J�
1 S
O
v j
y �
s _x ,
3 � Q
V s' CD
4 d V
J �
.9
y
1 `o
st•r
s +
i
.i'�
§ '� ,{ :xtfi�,.}, �,Y tot:� • x+,..+" k .
�n t'-r
2
S,�e2F r•,Yx9;k "±,• ` �����\ r��-�;. °'�clF•x g , `y3�"#�.�,
/-� . 7 u 'M�t d s'�<.c$*^^s 1,• r ; y? s 6 w'^4 I j r �i X:fW/ +.fi#
QV� � r �S�i !'��y""�'Q# A ;�` Ott�� �'�'t`+1+ z,a.x 3{`€ � :''[ ,a{�P�" •"3:_u„{�q.A p t
w{' :3
i1.
Q.. '. kxmz
FkW"'}`§'r
�,Y� n ^.i'ar+�,er•
VA.
t G 'I nn X1 t�M7d'^ii''�R5,,F43 {F�.1�2
trpb
•� C' w ',`. `!N 7 -'k�ux s ..x�iz�u 1 :} -} 4 ...•t` ,1
1a PR'^ y"� - iT. "k5 zy `G""� Fy •1.#a• fi �'� xi �. 3f Xd/ � :,.}{
Ysq ?.. a.'S✓ *r eF dB' h .Y-w
1411
t✓'§dK 'fi'� ,?.e � 5� AF^.
'rn w4 �,i 5i` 'A.-rt
as e } e w z s. g" a. ? ak Rioi r r ai h
x r < s Fr is s s . r 4w r
.` _ 'h f ysY' s .v d r -? �• { - h{ra {moi^'.a.. ."`'�' k § r' O a s r
Al
��`"` *``�">n,§`�d '+`", ,'§�W� � "4i .��r �Z.�l* 3#v+e��� 5,3,ryyFi�� � �� i •ih�.f-.frt' � --�K,''��4M1`.'c.t�� 3 v ��{d
IfE
54 d �.'� �r�'-�'Tt,$ ,gC.3�t{ r�.'L�vly s �'"y r,:wh m,�g °4t:kt 'a'`xw`�•iyznd A�k� � �P���'x x�� �t5 p�• k?a""`4`.�r;''d
4 +u2 S %�,Q S,'�• Y y�+ ,rry`Y a n+ ri �y,�•`ata �HaA p �t� ; .+3i+,#-* 4:;�''p4, � .a
' ����'� � . �' a �' i {�F'>•.§ 3,Yt5 SE+S .yhc, �,�;y. 11 y: ' Taw 9w ' �' ' � �' �� "" '. � .''z�z-y
�-� � �` �:. lk��.$"'�,%�+�'�.'?£�'�NZ`^k?,�i.:r 'ate i •^i...tea du.J �ax�. `T. .� .: •� �•�X� .�� t •�,
r $$
r .
PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. ,
DATE: MAY 6, 1992
SCALE: 1"=20'
NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey and not
an instrument survey, therefore all offsetts shown
are approximate
BAYSTATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. ,
' N OF
JI
O n Y
a JAM- =
" S0T6i0S.
Nu. 26D9h c��,
,S
\ /J
t�)
C� Oeo
y� ,t
v1 pQoG�o
L w ra ACUi'tro" A<Se�a'yS
sem_ r p
_o
1 yZ-W�
iN
5 i
Z- A NGDoN ST
� l
R CLAIMS REVIEW ASSOCIATES
- A j
"...taking action to combat loss"
I
PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM, MASS. ,
DATE: MAY 6, 1992
SCALE: 1"=20'
NOTE: This plan was compiled by a tape survey and not
an instrument survey, therefore all offsetts shown
are approximate
BAYSTATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES
234 CABOT STREET, BEVERLY, MASS. , -
,r+►�`H U! MgsSy�
O y,
? BER ,:^1
ME.,
1'tR v
'2f FCISTE4�� as
S��yR! lPS:O f''v
,5
\ I
yl.S
t Lj)
� t
LoT pkoocs�
w �� AOOITION �` �SSr�S�s
oT
?3 `I
411,S-
ly
x #�y
�� z- ANGDc) N ST.